Search

Thiophenic compounds are major constituents of fossil fuels and pose problems for fuel refinement. The quantification and speciation of these compounds is of great interest in different areas such as biology, fossil fuels studies, geology, and archaeology. Sulfur 1s Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy has emerged as a qualitative and quantitative method for sulfur speciation. A firm understanding of the sulfur 1s NEXAFS spectra of organosulfur species is required for these analytical studies. To support this development, the sulfur 1s NEXAFS spectra of simple thiols and thioethers were previously examined, and are now extended to studies of thiophenic and aromatic thioether compounds, in the gas and condensed phases. High-resolution spectra have been further analyzed with the aid of Improved Virtual Orbital (IVO) and Δ(self-consistent field) ab initio calculations. Experimental sulfur 1s NEXAFS spectra show fine features predicted by calculation, and the combination of experiment and calculation has been used to improve the assignment of spectroscopic features important for the speciation and quantification of sulfur compounds. Systematic differences between gas and condensed phases are also explored; these differences suggest a significant role for conformational effects in the NEXAFS spectra of condensed species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The electronic nature of Ni π‐complexes is underexplored even though these complexes have been widely postulated as intermediates in organometallic chemistry. Herein, the geometric and electronic structure of a series of nickel π‐complexes, Ni(dtbpe)(X) (dtbpe=1,2‐bis(di‐tert‐butyl)phosphinoethane; X=alkene or carbonyl containing π‐ligands), is probed using a combination of 31P NMR, Ni K‐edge XAS, Ni Kβ XES, and DFT calculations. These complexes are best described as square planar d10 complexes with π‐backbonding acting as the dominant contributor to M−L bonding to the π‐ligand. The degree of backbonding correlates with 2JPP from NMR and the energy of the Ni 1s→4pz pre‐edge in the Ni K‐edge XAS data, and is determined by the energy of the π*ip ligand acceptor orbital. Thus, unactivated olefinic ligands tend to be poor π‐acids whereas ketones, aldehydes, and esters allow for greater backbonding. However, backbonding is still significant even in cases in which metal contributions are minor. In such cases, backbonding is dominated by charge donation from the diphosphine, which allows for strong backdonation, although the metal centre retains a formal d10 electronic configuration. This ligand‐induced backbonding can be formally described as a 3‐centre‐4‐electron (3c‐4e) interaction, in which the nickel centre mediates charge transfer from the phosphine σ‐donors to the π*ip ligand acceptor orbital. The implications of this bonding motif are described with respect to both structure and reactivity. Backbonding like never before: A series of Ni π‐complexes were explored using a combination of spectroscopic and computational methods to reveal an intriguing contribution to backbonding: metal‐mediated ligand‐to‐ligand backdonation. Such ligand‐induced backdonation is the dominant contribution for weakly π‐acidic ligands such as alkenes and allows for strong bonding while retaining a formal d10 electronic configuration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herein, we report experimental, spectroscopic, and computational data that indicate that a rhodium ethylene complex, formally described as rhodium(I) and which forms a 2-rhoda(III) oxetane following reaction with H2O2, is more accurately described as a rhodium(III) metallacyclopropane. X-ray absorption spectroscopy clearly demonstrates a change in the oxidation state at rhodium following ligand coordination with tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine. Both NMR and density functional theory studies suggest a high energy barrier to rotation of the coordinated ethylene, which is attributed to large geometric and electronic reorganization resulting from the loss of p-back-bonding. These results imply that the role of H2O2 in the formation of 2-rhoda(III) oxetanes is to oxidize the C2H4 fragment rather than the metal center, as has been previously suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The electronic nature of Ni π-complexes is underexplored even though these complexes have been widely postulated as intermediates in organometallic chemistry. Herein, the geometric and electronic structure of a series of nickel π-complexes, Ni(dtbpe)(X) (dtbpe=1,2-bis(di-tert-butyl)phosphinoethane; X=alkene or carbonyl containing π-ligands), is probed using a combination of 31 P NMR, Ni K-edge XAS, Ni K β XES, and DFT calculations. These complexes are best described as square planar d 10 complexes with π-backbonding acting as the dominant contributor to M-L bonding to the π-ligand. The degree of backbonding correlates with 2 J PP from NMR and the energy of the Ni 1s→4p z pre-edge in the Ni K-edge XAS data, and is determined by the energy of the π* ip ligand acceptor orbital. Thus, unactivated olefinic ligands tend to be poor π-acids whereas ketones, aldehydes, and esters allow for greater backbonding. However, backbonding is still significant even in cases in which metal contributions are minor. In such cases, backbonding is dominated by charge donation from the diphosphine, which allows for strong backdonation, although the metal centre retains a formal d 10 electronic configuration. This ligand-induced backbonding can be formally described as a 3-centre-4-electron (3c-4e) interaction, in which the nickel centre mediates charge transfer from the phosphine σ-donors to the π* ip ligand acceptor orbital. The implications of this bonding motif are described with respect to both structure and reactivity., (© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)