Search

Introduction Sleep disturbance and fatigue are commonly reported in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) but specific prevalence and the relationship to disease control are unknown. Method This retrospective non-interventional observational study of data from the OPAL dataset included patients with AS (ICD code M45, M45.0 or M08.1), aged 18 to 95 years and had completed ≥ 1 sleep questionnaire between 1 January 2019 and 30 September 2020. The prevalence of insomnia and obstructive sleep apnoea were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Multivariate Apnoea Prediction Index (MAPI), respectively. Propensity score (PS) matching based on sex, age and symptom duration increased comparability between patients administered tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin 17A inhibitors (IL-17Ai). Results Four hundred ninety-five patients were included. The mean ISI total score in the overall population was 8.6 ± 6.2. Self-reported moderate or severe clinical insomnia was present in 16% and 3.2% of patients, respectively. The mean MAPI score was 0.4 ± 0.3, self-reported apnoea was identified in 31.5% of patients and the mean FACIT-Fatigue score was 36.1 ± 10.7. In the PS matched population, the only treatment-related difference was the mean MAPI score (IL-17Ai 0.4 ± 0.3 and TNFi 0.3 ± 0.2, p = 0.046). Those with poor disease control (BASDAI ≥ 4) were more likely (odds ratio [OR] 7.29, 95% CI 2.37 to 22.46, p = 0.001) to have a greater severity of insomnia symptoms than those with good disease control. Conclusion In this real-world AS cohort, poor disease control was associated with sleep disturbance. Little difference in sleep disturbance was observed between biologic TNFi and IL-17Ai treatment. Key Points • Sleep disturbance and fatigue are common in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.• In our real-world cohort, self-reported apnoea was reported in one-third of patients; and one in five patients reported moderate to severe insomnia.• Those with poor disease control were more likely to experience greater sleep disturbance than those with good disease control.

Background Cancer cachexia negatively affects quality of life (QoL) and increases symptom burden. A multimodal treatment approach may optimize cachexia outcomes, including QoL. We evaluated QoL and symptoms over time among patients attending a multidisciplinary clinical service for cancer cachexia. Methods Adults with cancer who attended the clinical service three times between 2017 and 2020 were included. Quality of life and symptoms were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and the Functional Assessment Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaires. Physical function was assessed using the 30s sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength. Results Overall, 162 patients (age = 67.2 ± 12.0 years) were included. Mean six-month weight loss at baseline was 10.4% ± 9.4%. Mean body weight was stable between clinic visits (P = 0.904) and no change in sit-to-stand repetitions (P = 0.133) or handgrip strength (P = 0.734) occurred over time. Improvements in EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL overall QoL (Δ10.7 ± 2.5, P < 0.001), physical function (Δ8.0 ± 2.4, P = 0.003) and emotional function (Δ11.4 ± 2.9, P < 0.001) occurred by the second visit. EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL fatigue (Δ13.8 ± 2.9, P < 0.001), pain (Δ10.3 ± 3.3, P = 0.007), nausea/vomiting (Δ16.1 ± 3.0, P < 0.001) and appetite symptoms (Δ25.9 ± 3.8, P < 0.001) also improved by the second visit. FAACT total score (Δ14.6 ± 2.7, P < 0.001), anorexia-cachexia symptoms (Δ6.6 ± 1.1, P< 0.001), and physical (Δ3.7 ± 0.70, P < 0.001), emotional (Δ1.9 ± 0.60, P = 0.005) and functional wellbeing (Δ2.7 ± 0.71, P = 0.001) improved by the second visit. All improvements in EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and FAACT outcomes were maintained at the third visit. Conclusion Significant improvements in QoL and symptoms were associated with attending a cancer cachexia clinical service. Our findings support using multidisciplinary, multimodal cancer cachexia treatment approaches to improve patient wellbeing.

ObjectiveTo assess public understanding of medicine safety, approach to risks and preferences in accessing safety information.MethodsQualitative data were obtained from an online survey (n = 1079) covering four major themes around side effects and risks of medicines: willingness to accept side effects of medications, information seeking, sufficiency of information and understanding pharmacovigilance process. Comparisons were made for age, gender and social/financial status.Key findingsMost respondents acknowledged medications were associated with side effects. If side effects were experienced, most (73%) would seek advice from their doctor or pharmacist. Four in 10 respondents felt doctors and pharmacists do not provide sufficient information about medications, even though many (47%) relied on their doctor to provide this. Although 51% felt that pharmaceutical companies were already providing enough information to patients, 95% responded that extra effort could still be made. Two-thirds of the respondents felt it was the companies’ responsibility to educate doctors and pharmacists so they could pass the information on, even though younger respondents preferred direct communication to patients compared to older respondents (65 years, 10%; P < 0.001). Men were more willing to accept risks, while women were more likely to seek information about their medicines. Understanding of the role of pharmaceutical companies and government in maintaining the safety of medicines was generally poor.ConclusionsThere is an ongoing need for consumer education regarding medicine safety. Doctors and pharmacists remain the more trusted source of information. Pharmaceutical companies play an important role in ensuring such information is both accessible and accurate.

Background: Standard of care in treatment of cancer-related pain involves opioids in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Ketorolac, a NSAID, has demonstrated opioid-sparing effects in other clinical settings. Aim: This systematic literature review investigated ketorolac’s opioid-sparing effects in patients receiving opioids for chronic, cancer-related pain. Design: The primary outcome was total daily dose of opioids. Secondary outcomes included frequency of opioid use, use and frequency of ‘rescue’ medication and adverse events. Outcomes were described, and meta-analysed where possible. PROSPERO registration CRD42019130894. Data sources: Articles included original research, from any study phase or methodology, published in English in a peer-reviewed journal or conference between 1990 and 2020; included subjects >18 years; had chronic cancer-related pain and described the use of opioid-sparing effect of ketorolac. Results: Nine articles were included. While there was significant heterogeneity, ketorolac may have an opioid-sparing effect, with significant reductions in total daily dose of morphine observed in a single randomised controlled trial (SMD −4.30 mg, 95% CI −5.36 to −3.25), but the changes in the before and after studies were not statistically significant −0.46 mg (95% CI −1.14 to 0.22). Ketorolac was associated with greater likelihood of complete pain relief, but the data were heterogeneous. Insufficient data were available to analyse frequency of opioid use, or rescue medication requirements. Conclusions: Given the heterogeneity of the data, adequately powered, randomised controlled trials are required to establish any opioid-sparing effect of ketorolac. For patients not responding to conventional pain management, ketorolac may have a role in treatment augmentation.

Background Tolvaptan is the only available disease-modifying treatment for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Prior to October 2020 access to tolvaptan in Australia was restricted by a controlled monitoring and distribution program called IMADJIN®. Focusing on hepatic safety, the IMADJIN® program collected real-world data on patients with ADPKD. A retrospective, secondary data analysis of the IMADJIN® dataset was undertaken to determine the time to all-cause discontinuation of tolvaptan in Australia. Methods Demographic and treatment data from 17 September 2018 to 30 September 2020 were extracted from the IMADJIN® dataset. Treatment persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox’s proportional hazard models were used to analyze differences in treatment persistence by age, sex and location. Results Four hundred seventy-nine patients with ADPKD were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6, 23.4), the Kaplan-Meier estimation of 12-month persistence was 76.7% (95% CI 72.2, 80.5%). 114 (23.8%) patients discontinued treatment; sex, state, and remoteness did not significantly affect treatment persistence. Patients in the youngest tertile were more likely to discontinue compared to older ages (p = 0.049). Reasons for discontinuation included: aquaretic tolerability (4.2%), hepatic adverse events (abnormal liver function tests) (2.1%), disease progression (1.5%), and acute kidney injury (0.2%). Patients with a lack of aquaretic tolerance had shorter time to discontinuation. Hepatic toxicity events were initially observed 3 months after tolvaptan initiation and were less prevalent over time. Conclusions Persistence to tolvaptan in the real-world IMADJIN® dataset was 76%. Discontinuation due to hepatic events was low. Prescribers should take extra care when initiating treatment in younger patients as they are more likely to discontinue tolvaptan compared to older individuals. Nevertheless, the precise reason for this observation remains to be elucidated.

ObjectiveTo describe the treatment response and persistence to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a real-world Australian cohort.MethodsThis was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study that extracted data for patients with AS from the Optimising Patient outcomes in Australian RheumatoLogy (OPAL) dataset for the period of August 2006 to September 2019. Patients were classified as either bDMARD initiators if they commenced a bDMARD during the sampling window, or bDMARD-naïve if they did not. Results were summarized descriptively. Treatment persistence was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Differences in treatment persistence were explored using log-rank tests.ResultsThere were 5048 patients with AS identified. Of these, 2597 patients initiated bDMARDs and 2451 remained bDMARD-naïve throughout the study window. Treatment with first-, second-, and third-line bDMARDs significantly reduced disease activity. Median persistence on first-line bDMARDs was 96 months (95% CI 85–109), declining to 19 months (95% CI 16–22) in second-line therapy, and 15 months (95% CI 11–18) in third-line therapy. Median persistence was longest for the golimumab (GOL) group in all lines of therapy and shortest for the etanercept (ETN) group. Differences in persistence rates according to the time period that bDMARDs were prescribed (pre- and post-2012) were also seen for ETN and adalimumab.ConclusionIn this cohort, all bDMARDs effectively reduced AS disease activity. Treatment persistence was sustained for up to 8 years for patients remaining on their first bDMARD, longer than on subsequent agents. Further research is needed to determine its influence on treatment recommendations.

Objective This study aimed to describe the real-world effectiveness and treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a retrospective, non-interventional study that extracted data for patients treated with tofacitinib or bDMARDs from the Australian OPAL dataset between March 2015 and September 2018. Monotherapy tofacitinib and bDMARDs and combination therapy tofactinib and bDMARDs were propensity score matched and treatment effectiveness and persistence of the groups were evaluated. Results In the bDMARD and tofacitinib monotherapy and combination therapy matched populations there were 1300 bDMARD initiators (n = 564 monotherapy) and 650 tofacitinib initiators (n = 282 monotherapy). In the bDMARD and tofacitinib monotherapy matched groups, 62.9% and 66.7% were in DAS-28 CRP disease remission after 18 months of treatment, respectively. In the combination therapy bDMARD and tofacitinib groups, 50% and 58.9% were in DAS-28 CRP disease remission after 18 months, respectively. The median treatment persistence was similar between the monotherapy bDMARD and tofacitinib treatment groups (36.7 months (95% CI 27.4 to “not reached’) and 34.2 months (95%CI 30.3 to “not reached”) respectively) as well as the combination therapy bDMARD and tofacitinib groups (32.2 months (95% CI 25.7 to 34.4) and 32.7 months (95%CI 28.7 to “not reached”, respectively). Conclusions Patients receiving combination therapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs had higher disease activity scores at index than patients receiving monotherapy. Monotherapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs, and combination therapy with tofacitinib or bDMARDs demonstrated similar treatment effectiveness and persistence, respectively. Key Points• This study provides real-world evidence regarding effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with monotherapy or combination therapy tofacitinib.• The study suggests that monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib is an effective intervention in RA with persistence and effectiveness comparable to bDMARDs.

The cannabis plant presents a complex biochemical unit of over 500 constituents of which 70 or more molecules have been classified as cannabinoids binding to cannabinoid receptors. The study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary pharmacokinetics of a nanoparticle CBD formulation. The cannabis-based medicine was elaborated with a micellular technology, to produce a water-soluble nanoparticle CBD-dominant anti-inflammatory cannabis medicine (MDCNB-02). On day one, 12 participants administered 2 sprays and on day 2 administered 6 sprays to alternating right and left cheeks [18 mg of CBD and 0.72 mg of THC]. Four other participants administered 2 and 6 sprays on days 1 and 2, respectively of a nanoparticle placebo. The study met the primary outcomes of safety, tolerability, and preliminary pharmacokinetics of a standardized CBD-dominant anti-inflammatory extract for oro-buccal administration. Bioavailability of a 6 mg and 18 mg dose of CBD (median IQR) was 0.87 and 8.9 ng h mL−1, respectively. The maximum concentration of CBD for the low and high doses administered once per day occurred at 60 min for both concentrations. The median half-life of the 6 mg and 18 mg CBD dose was 1.23 and 5.45 h, respectively. The apparent clearance of CBD was 115 and 34 L min−1 for a 6 mg and 18 mg dose, respectively. The oro-buccal nanoparticle formulation achieved plasma concentrations that were largely comparable to other commercial and investigated formulations relative to the concentrations administered. Moreover, there were no reports of adverse effects associated with unfavorable inflammatory sequalae.

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]

AIM: This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics, tolerability, safety and exploratory analgesic efficacy of a novel water-soluble oro-buccal nanoparticle spray of a cannabis-based medicine in advanced cancer patients with unrelieved pain. METHODS: The study was a non-blinded single arm, single escalating dose (n=5) [2.5 mg Δ9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD) and multiple escalating doses (up to 5.5 doses)] of a two-stage pilot study in patients diagnosed with advanced cancers and intractable pain (n=25). RESULTS: As the cannabis-based medicine dose increased, maximum plasma concentrations of all analytes were approximately proportional to dose. The bioavailability of Δ9-THC and CBD in this water-soluble nanoparticle formulation was approximately twice the bioavailability reported for Δ9-THC/CBD formulation with ethanol. The water-soluble formulation in the current study resulted in a higher median (min, max) bioavailability of Δ9-THC than CBD (AUC from 2.5 mg each of Δ9-THC and CBD was 1.71 ng mL.h-1 (1.1, 6.6) and 0.65 ng mL.h-1 (0.49. 4.1), respectively). Analyte accumulation was not observed. In a subgroup of patients diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer with bone metastases, mean pain scores improvement from baseline was 40% (unadjusted) and 33% adjusted for rescue medication use. For all patients the most commonly reported adverse events were mild or moderate drowsiness affecting 11 (44%) and 4 (6%) patients, respectively and nausea and vomiting that affected 18 (72%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The water-soluble cannabis-based medicine (NanaBisTM) provided acceptable bioavailability for Δ9-THC and CBD, appeared safe and tolerable in cancer with uncontrolled pain with preliminary evidence of analgesic efficacy.

Lowering intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is being advocated as an obesity prevention strategy in Australia. The purpose of this study was to extend on previous reports of trends in national volume sales of SSBs. Data were extracted from commercially available datasets of beverage sales (AC Nielsen (1997&ndash, 2011) and IRI Australia (2009&ndash, 2018)). Linear regression was used to examine trends for the period 1997 to 2018. Per capita attribution of volume sales and sugar contribution was estimated by dividing by the Australian resident population for the relevant year. Per capita volume sales of SSBs fell 27%, from 83L/person to 61L/person, largely driven by declining sales of sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drinks (76 to 45L/person). Volume sales of non-SSB increased, from 48 to 88L/person, the largest contributor being pure unflavoured still waters (6 to 48L/person). Volume sales of non-SSBs have exceeded those of SSBs since 2015. The yearly contribution of SSBs to the sugar content of the national diet declined from 9.0 to 6.4kg/person. Major, long-term shifts are occurring in the market for non-alcoholic, water-based beverages in Australia, notably a fall in per capita volume sales of SSBs and an increase in volume sales of water. Both trends are consistent with obesity prevention strategies.

Background:Sleep disorders are more prevalent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared to the general population. Sleep disturbance in AS, in addition to pain and fatigue, can lead to impaired physical function and reduced quality of life.Objectives:The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients with AS in a real-world Australian cohort using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Multivariate Apnoea Prediction Index (MAPI). ISI score of ≥ 15 is considered clinical insomnia. MAPI values below 0.05 are suggestive of clinical apnoea.Methods:Routinely collected, de-identified clinical data were sourced from the OPAL dataset. Patients aged between 18 and 95 years with a diagnosis of AS and who had completed at least one ISI or MAPI questionnaire between Jan-2019 and Sept-2020 were included. ISI and MAPI questionnaires were emailed to patients using OPAL’s electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) delivery method or completed in the clinic using a smart device and returned to the patient’s file using a QR code. Disease activity was assessed using BASDAI collected at the same time as the sleep questionnaires. Age, sex and duration of symptoms were used to propensity match patients in the Il-17ai and TNFi group in a 1:2 ratio.Results:495 of the 5,323 patients identified with AS completed a questionnaire and were included in the analysis (n=395 TNFi, n=48 Il-17ai (secukinumab), n=52 other therapies). 142 were included in the propensity score matched population (n = 94 TNFi, and n = 48 Il-17ai). In the overall population the mean (SD) age was 48.3 (13.6), 55.4% were males, the mean (SD) BMI was 30.1 (19.6) at the index date and 4.8% reported depression. 51.7% had an optimal disease control (BASDAI Conclusion:In this real-world AS cohort, poor disease control was associated with sleep disturbance, despite bDMARD therapy. Little difference was observed between TNFi and Il-17ai treatment. Screening for sleep disturbance and fatigue in routine clinical care may provide a more holistic view of the burden of this disease.Table 1.Patient characteristics and outcome scores in the propensity score matched population at index.TNFi (n=94)Il-17ai (n=48)p valueBMI category Underweight2 (2%)1 (2%)0.094 Normal weight33 (35%)8 (17%) Overweight24 (26%)16 (33%) Obese27 (29%)21 (44%) Missing8 (9%)2 (4%)Duration of treatment (months), mean (SD)61.0 (156.7)23.7 (20.1)0.18BASDAI 43 (46%)23 (48%)0.89BASDAI > 416 (17%)8 (17%)Missing35 (37%)17 (35%)ISI score, mean (SD)9.1 (6.6)8.9 (5.9)0.83ISI category (n (%)0.83 No clinically significant insomnia44 (57%)24 (50%) Subthreshold insomnia30 (32%)15 (31%) Clinical insomnia (moderate)15 (16%)8 (17%) Clinical insomnia (severe)5 (5%)1 (2%)MAPI score, mean (SD)0.3 (0.2)0.4 (0.3)0.046MAPI, high apnoea risk Yes17 (18%)16 (33%)0.051 No62 (66%)26 (54%) Missing15 (16%)6 (12%)Acknowledgements:The authors acknowledge the members of OPAL Rheumatology Ltd and their patients for providing clinical data for this study, and Software4Specialists Pty Ltd for providing the Audit4 platform. We acknowledge WriteSource Medical Pty Ltd for providing statistical services. Funding for this study was provided by Novartis.Disclosure of Interests:Kathleen Tymms: None declared, Belinda Butcher: None declared, Tracey Sletten: None declared, Tegan Smith: None declared, Catherine OSullivan: None declared, Geoff Littlejohn Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi and Seqirus., Ricky Sadler Employee of: Current employee of Novartis, Rebecca Tronnberg Employee of: Current employee of Novartis, Hedley Griffiths Consultant of: AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis and Lilly.

Introduction R-mini-CHOP is an established standard of care in elderly patients with DLBCL, with a 2yr OS of 59% and PFS of 47% (Peyrade et al, Lancet Oncol 2011). The addition of ibrutinib to full dose R-CHOP in younger pts with DLBCL has efficacy, but significant toxicity limits the ability to complete therapy in pts ≥60 yrs (Younes et al, JCO 2019). We previously demonstrated the deliverability of ibrutinib with R-mini-CHOP in 80 pts ≥75yrs with DLBCL with a median average relative total dose of 97%; 77% of pts received 6 cycles of R-mini-CHOP despite SAEs in 62% (Verner et al, Haematol Oncol 2019). Here we present the primary efficacy endpoint and key secondary and exploratory endpoints. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study of patients aged ≥75yrs with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Pts received six 21-day cycles of ibrutinib 560mg/d and R-mini-CHOP (Rituximab 375mg/m 2, cyclophosphamide 400mg/m 2, doxorubicin 25mg/m 2, vincristine 1mg on day 1 & prednisone 40mg/m 2 or 100mg/d x 5) followed by an additional two 21-day cycles of rituximab + ibrutinib (or high dose methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis). The efficacy primary endpoint was 2yr OS. Sample size calculations were made using a one-sample two-sided approach to detect a 15% improvement on the fixed reference OS (59%) and PFS (47%) rates (Peyrade et al, Lancet Oncol 2011). Results Eighty pts were recruited from Nov 2015 to Dec 2018. One died prior to receiving treatment and is not included in the analysis. Median age was 82yrs (75-95); 51% female, 81% stage III/IV and 63% IPI 3-5: 47% had a CIRS-G score of ≥6 (range 0-17). On centralized immunohistochemistry (IHC), 57% (45/79) were non-Germinal Centre B cell-like (GCB) subtype; 43% (34/79) were GCB. At a data cut-off of 6June 21, median follow-up was 29.5 months (m) (0.2 to 66.3). Two-year OS was 68% (95% CI 55-77%), not differing significantly from the null hypothesis of 59% (p=0.10), (Figure 1A). Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI 34m to NR), and was longer in those with lower IPI (IPI 1-3: NR, IPI 4: 35m, IPI 5: 19m). Two-year PFS was 60% (95% CI 47-70%), significantly different from the reference 47% (p At least one adverse event (AE) occurred in 99% pts (78/79): 30% (24/79) grade 1-2, 64% (49/79) grade 3-4, and 6% (5/79) grade 5. Most common grade ≥3 AEs were lung infection (13%), other infections (11%), anemia (11%), febrile neutropenia (9%), thrombocytopenia (9%), and atrial fibrillation (8%). Serious AEs occurred in 67%: most commonly lung infection (11%), atrial fibrillation (9%), fever (9%), and other infection (9%). 12/14 pts with atrial fibrillation/flutter were new onset. Ibrutinib was temporarily ceased in 62% of patients, and permanently ceased in 25%, mostly due to adverse events. As previously reported, the overall response rate on an intention to treat basis was 57/80 (71%) (Verner et al, ASH 2019). Response rates did not differ by cell of origin (COO) (ORR: non-GCB 76%, GCB 68% p=0.44). When recorded, pt's EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status significantly improved between screening [n=78; mean (SD) 58(25)], end of treatment [n=57; 63(23)] and 18mo post-treatment [n=29; 74(19)] p=0.007. Significant reductions in fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhea were also observed in respondents. There was no impact of CIRS-G score on disease response rate or risk of death. Conclusion The addition of ibrutinib to R-mini-CHOP was deliverable and improved 2-yr PFS compared to R-mini-CHOP alone. However, while there was a trend towards improvement in 2-yr OS, a target 15% increase was not achieved in this small sample size. Despite considerable and not unexpected toxicity in this elderly cohort, the QOL and functional improvements in survivors are also promising. These data support further study of the addition of ibrutinib to R-mini-CHOP in elderly patients with DLBCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Verner: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Hawkes: Merck KgA: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Specialised Therapeutics: Consultancy; Antigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharpe Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel and accommodation expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee: Roche: Honoraria; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cheah: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Research Funding. Purtill: Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS Celgene: Honoraria. Enjeti: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Curnow: Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mylan: Consultancy; Norgine: Consultancy, Honoraria. Butcher: WriteSource: Current Employment, Other: Medical writing for Pharma companies. Not pertinent to this abstract for which author is study Statisticiam. Trotman: JANSSEN: Research Funding; TAKEDA: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; PCYC: Research Funding; roche: Research Funding; beigene: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib is not approved for use in DLBCL

Introduction The combination of rituximab & lenalidomide (R 2) is an established regimen for treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL), with efficacy reported in the first line and relapsed setting (Morchhauser NEJM 2018, Leonard JCO 2019). The inferior OS of patients who remain post-induction PET-CT positive (PET+ve) has also been demonstrated in both settings (Trotman Lancet Haem 2014, Lancet Oncol 2018, Ysebaert, ASH 2011). We sought to study the effect of R 2 in relapsed FL by examining its ability to convert to PET-negative (PET-ve) those patients who remain PET+ve after reinduction rituximab-chemotherapy. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, Phase 2 study of patients with bulky Stage II, or Stage III-IV relapsed FL. Eligibility criteria were: at least stable disease on CT within 4-6 weeks of last cycle of re-induction rituximab-chemotherapy; ECOG ≤2; CrCL ³30mL/min; haemoglobin >80g/L, neutrophils >1.0 & platelets >75 x 10 9/L. Exclusion criteria were: histological transformation ≤12 months (mo); any interim-PET that was negative, and other malignancy ≤5 years. After enrolment pts underwent a centrally-reviewed PET within 8 weeks of D1 last cycle of re-induction rituximab-chemotherapy. Given the higher probability of further progression in the relapsed setting PET+ve was defined as a Deauville score (DS) 3-5. PET-ve patients were assigned rituximab maintenance q2mo for 2 years, and those remaining PET+ve were assigned R 2 to commence within 12 weeks. Lenalidomide schedule for R 2 pts was 10mg/d x 21 q28d, with dose modifications for tolerance, over a planned 2 years. Repeat PET scans were scheduled at 6 & 12 mo after starting R 2. The primary endpoint was the rate of conversion from postinduction PET+ve to PET-ve in evaluable patients 6 mo after commencing lenalidomide. Evaluable patients were defined as those receiving >63 days of Lenalidomide. Sample size calculations used a one-sided exact test for proportions, assuming a conversion rate of ³50% as worthy of further evaluation and ≤20% as unacceptable. Thus 16 evaluable patients were required to have 80% power with type I error of 5%. Secondary endpoints were PET conversion rates by baseline DS in the PET+ve, the toxicity & deliverability of R 2, and PFS & OS in both the PET+ve & PET-ve populations. Results Thirty-seven patients (pts) were recruited from Nov 2013 to Jan 2021 when the study was closed due to poor recruitment attributed to competing studies. Median (med) age was 67yrs (36-83); 58% male, med 2 (range 2-11) prior therapies incl. the recent rituximab-chemotherapy; FLIPI low risk (21%), intermediate risk (12%) high risk (67%). Eighteen of 37 (48.6%) pts were postinduction PET+ve. Med follow-up was 38 mo (0.8 - 76.4): 32 mo (0.8 - 76.4) in PET+ve and 42 mo (6.7 - 73.8) in PET-neg. Of the 18 PET+ve pts one was ineligible for R 2 due to reactivation of hepatitis B; 3 were not evaluable having not received >63 doses of lenalidomide due to progressive disease (PD). Thus 14/18 (78%) PET+ve pts were evaluable, of whom 5/14 (36%; 95% CI 11% - 61%) became PET-ve at 6-mo, thus not excluding a PET conversion rate of Of the 17 PET+ve pts starting lenalidomide, deliverability was limited by both disease progression and AEs: 3 failed to receive 3 cycles, 6 pts received 4-6, and 8 pts 7-24 cycles. Mean number of lenalidomide doses was 213 (SD 188). At least one AE was reported in 16/17 (94%), most commonly neutropenia (n=10, 59%, Gd4 24%). At least one SAE occurred in 9/17 (53%): infections 2, malignancy 2, cardiac disorders 2, musculoskeletal 2, other causes 3 pts. Conclusion The high PET+ve rate of 49% (DS 3-5) after rituximab-chemotherapy for relapsed FL suggests the need for consolidation therapy. However, R 2 did not achieve a sufficiently high PET-conversion rate to justify further study. The inferior outcome of patients who remain PET+ve after treatment of relapse highlights the importance of investigating novel approaches in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Trotman: TAKEDA: Research Funding; beigene: Research Funding; roche: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; PCYC: Research Funding; JANSSEN: Research Funding. Gandhi: janssen: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria. Butcher: WriteSource: Current Employment, Other: Medical writing for Pharma companies. Not pertinent to this abstract for which author is study Statisticiam.

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

The aim of this study was to describe the real-world evidence for effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns among patients in the community with rheumatoid arthritis treated with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib.This was a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study that extracted data for new users of tofacitinib or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) from the Australian Optimizing Patient outcomes in Australian RheumatoLogy (OPAL) dataset between March 2015 and September 2018. Patients were propensity score matched at a 1:2 tofacitinib to bDMARD ratio based on age, sex, and selected baseline treatment combinations. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated using disease status measures. Treatment persistence was calculated and the percentage of patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy at treatment initiation was evaluated.Data from 2810 patients were extracted and 1950 patients were included in the matched population (1300 bDMARD initiators and 650 tofacitinib initiators). Patients were predominantly aged 55 to 74 years (57.8%) and female (81.2%). After 18 months of treatment, 52.4% and 57.8% of patients had achieved disease activity score (DAS) remission in the bDMARD and tofacitinib groups, respectively. The median treatment persistence for tofacitinib was similar to that for bDMARDs: 34.2 months (95% CI 32.2 to not reached) and 33.8 months (95% CI 28.8 to 40.4), respectively. In the overall population, more patients were prescribed tofacitinib as monotherapy (43.4%) compared with bDMARD monotherapy (33.4%).Tofacitinib demonstrated treatment effectiveness and persistence similar to bDMARDs. Overall, there was a trend for more use of tofacitinib as monotherapy than bDMARDs. Key Points • This study provides real-world evidence regarding effectiveness, treatment persistence, and treatment patterns, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the community being treated with tofacitinib. • The study suggests that tofacitinib is an effective and enduring intervention in RA with tofacitinib persistence and effectiveness comparable to bDMARDs.

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Limited data from large real-world patient populations exist to describe treatment outcomes of patients who receive tofacitinib for the management of RA in Australia. Objectives: To evaluate effectiveness and treatment patterns of tofacitinib in a large real-world cohort of Australian adult patients with RA. Methods: Routinely collected, de-identified clinical data were sourced from the OPAL-QUMI dataset. Data from adult patients with a diagnosis of RA, who initiated treatment with tofacitinib or a bDMARD and had at least 12 months of follow–up between March 2015 and September 2018, were included. Descriptive analyses were performed on overall and propensity score matched populations. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated from baseline to month 18 by DAS28-ESR, SDAI and CDAI measures. Treatment persistence, in part a surrogate for efficacy, was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Treatment pattern evaluation included percentage of patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy at treatment initiation. Results: 1950 patients were included in the matched population (1300 bDMARD initiators; 650 tofacitinib initiators). Patients were predominantly aged 55 to 74 years (57.8%), and female (81.2%). At baseline, median disease duration was 107 and 120 months, with 16.1% and 17.3% of patients in DAS28-ESR defined disease remission for the bDMARD and tofacitinib groups respectively. After three months of treatment, 49.1% and 49.7% had achieved DAS remission and after 18 months of treatment, 52.4% and 57.8% of patients had achieved DAS remission in the bDMARD and tofacitinib groups respectively. At 18 months the percentage of patients achieving CDAI/SDAI remission was similar with 29.2%/29.0% bDMARD patients and 30.9%/30.5% tofacitinib patients reporting CDAI/SDAI remission respectively. The median persistence of treatment was similar for bDMARD and tofacitinib groups: 33.8 (95% CI 28.8 to 40.4) and 34.2 (95% CI 32.2 to not reached) months respectively. In the overall population, more patients were prescribed tofacitinib as monotherapy (43.4%) compared to bDMARD monotherapy (33.4%). Conclusion: In this analysis of a large real world dataset, tofacitinib demonstrated treatment effectiveness and persistence that was similar to bDMARDs. Overall, there was a trend for more use of tofacitinib as monotherapy than bDMARDs. Acknowledgement: We wish to acknowledge the Australian rheumatologists who contribute data to OPAL for research. Disclosure of Interests: Paul Bird Consultant for: Advisory boards for Eli Lily, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie, Geoff Littlejohn Consultant for: Sat on Advisory Boards for AbbVie, Janssen, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, and Sanofi Genzyme, Belinda Butcher Consultant for: Consultant biostatistician and medical writer providing services to AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, UCB., Employee of: Janssen, Tegan Smith Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant for: Provided medical writing services to Genentech, BioMarin, MSD, AbbVie, Roche, Actelion, Gilead, Kazia, Menarini, Candida da Fonseca Pereira Employee of: Pfizer, David Witcombe Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, Hedley Griffiths Grant/research support from: Research funded by AbbVie, Janssen, BMS, Consultant for: Advisory boards for Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen

Intrauterine contraception (IUC) is one of the more effective contraceptive methods for women at highest risk of unintended pregnancy. This includes younger, often nulliparous, women; however, uptake has been relatively low in this group.In February 2017 we conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies to identify barriers to IUC use in nulliparous women.Study quality was poor. No differences in rates of infection or expulsions between nulliparous and parous were seen. Fertility rates following removal appeared no different from the general population. Higher rates insertion difficulty, insertion failure and pain during insertion were observed in nulliparous women.A long-acting reversible contraceptive method such as IUC reduces the risk of unintended pregnancy since user failure is minimised. Evidence-based information about the advantages and disadvantages of IUC is required to inform decision-making and dispel any myths and misperceptions. Potential barriers to IUC use in nulliparous women, particularly concerns around infection, significantly higher rates of device expulsion and adverse effects on fertility, do not appear to be justified. IUC is appropriate for all medically-eligible women, including nulliparous women, and should be included in the range of contraceptive options discussed during counselling.

The aim was to describe the real-world treatment persistence of subcutaneous TNF inhibitors (TNFi) for patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease newly initiating treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD). This was a retrospective cohort study that extracted data for new users of TNFi between 1 August 2010 and 31 August 2016 from the Australian Optimising Patient outcome in Australian RheumatoLogy (OPAL) registry. Patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched with golimumab based on their age, sex, year of index, C-reactive protein level, baseline treatment combination and disease. Treatment persistence was calculated. Data from 3749 patients were extracted (adalimumab n = 1518; certolizumab n = 298; etanercept n = 1068; golimumab n = 865). The mean (SD) ages of patients were 51.7 (14.2) years for adalimumab, 53.7 (14.0) years for certolizumab, 52.8 (14.3) years for etanercept and 52.3 (14.6) years for golimumab, with disease durations 7.7 (10.5), 8.8 (9.2), 8.1 (10.4) and 7.3 (9.7) years, respectively. Two thirds of the patients were women. There was no significant difference in treatment persistence by treatment in the overall population (adalimumab 33.6 [95% CI 28.6–40.7], certolizumab 24.8 [95% CI 21.3–42.1], etanercept 27.6 [95% CI 23.4–36.5], golimumab 30.3 [95% CI 23.26–36.5]; months, p = 0.545), or in the propensity score-matched population. No safety signals were detected. In this real-world biologic-naive Australian inflammatory rheumatic disease cohort treated with subcutaneous TNF inhibitors during the period 2010–2016, there was no difference in treatment persistence between agents.

Introduction The addition of Ibrutinib to R-CHOP in younger pts with DLBCL has efficacy, but significant toxicity limits the ability to complete therapy in pts ≥60 yrs (Younes et al, JCO 2019). We have previously demonstrated the deliverability of Ibrutinib with R-mini-CHOP in 80 pts ≥75yrs with DLBCL with a median Average Relative Total Dose of 97%; 77% of pts received 6 cycles of R-mini-CHOP despite SAEs in 62% (Verner et al, Haematol Oncol 2019). Here we present response rates, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and quality of life (QoL) data. Methods Pts received six 21 day cycles of ibrutinib 560mg/d and R-mini-CHOP (Rituximab 375mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 400mg/m2, doxorubicin 25mg/m2, vincristine 1mg on day 1 &prednisone 100mg/d x 5) followed by an additional two 21 day cycles of rituximab + ibrutinib (or high dose methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis). Baseline comorbidities assessed by CIRS-G, end of treatment (EOT) response assessment per Lugano 2014 criteria and QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scores (VAS)) are presented for screening, throughout therapy and 1-month post treatment, with differences assessed using ANOVA. Missing values were not imputed. Results 80 pts were recruited from Nov 2015 to Dec 2018. Median age at registration was 81yrs (75-95); 51% female, 81% stage III/IV and 63% IPI 3-5. The majority of pts (88%; 70/80) had a CIRS-G score of ≥6 (range 4-21), a cut-off shown to be associated with a higher risk of early chemotherapy discontinuation in haematological malignancies (Poisson et al, EHA 2016). Median follow-up was 13.1 months (range 0.2 to 42.6). Treatment discontinuation occurred in 31% (25/80) pts. 23/80 (29%) have died; 14 due to progressive lymphoma, 5 due to infection, 1 intra-abdominal haemorrhage, 1 respiratory failure, 1 cardiac arrest, and 1 MPN/MDS. There was no association between baseline CIRS-G score, and completion of treatment, death or disease response. The overall response rate (ORR) on an intention to treat basis was 57/80 (71%). Eight cycles of treatment were completed by 55/80 (69%) pts, of whom 54 had an EOT PET. Of this population there was an ORR of 93% (50/54), with complete metabolic response (CMR) in 47/54 (87%); partial metabolic response in 4/54 (7%); and progressive metabolic disease in 3/54 (6%). A further 6 pts who discontinued treatment early achieved a CMR (between cycles 3-6) and 1 had stable metabolic disease. Progressive disease prior to cycle 8 occurred in 7/80 pts (9%). Eleven pts had no treatment response assessment, either due to death (n=5), withdrawal of consent (n=3), loss to follow up (n=2), or death prior to commencing chemotherapy. 2/80 (2%) pts had a recorded ≥10% decline in LVEF to QoL outcomes are presented in Figures 1 and 2. QOL, as assessed by two globally accepted tools, improved with treatment in the population completing EOT assessment. Patients' EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status and emotional functioning improved substantially while maintaining physical and cognitive functioning. There was a significant reduction in nausea, vomiting, pain, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhoea and an improvement in appetite with treatment. Similarly EQ-5D-5L VAS demonstrated that patients maintained mobility and independence with a significant reduction in pain/discomfort and improvement in mood. Conclusions Albeit with considerable toxicity and early mortality, Ibrutinib-R mini-CHOP is a deliverable and effective treatment for most pts ≥75yrs with DLBCL. While longer follow-up is required to assess our primary efficacy endpoint of 2yr overall survival, this promising response and reassuring QoL data highlights the merits of ongoing study to identify deliverable and effective treatments for DLBCL in the very elderly. Disclosures Verner: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Hawkes:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck Sharpe & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck KgA: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Mundi pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cheah:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria. Purtill:MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel for speaking and advisory boards; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel for speaking and advisory boards; Janssen: Honoraria. Enjeti:Astellas: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bayer and Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Curnow:NovoNordisk: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Honoraria; Mylan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Freeline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringher Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Butcher:ALLG: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Trotman:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib is not currently approved for use in DLBCL

SUMMARY Background Patients on haemodialysis (HD) have greater iron needs than the normal population. In 2004, the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI) group audited six Australian renal centres and found considerable variability in achievement of iron and haemoglobin targets. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether intravenous iron guidelines and evidence translate into good clinical outcomes for patients on HD. Design and Measurement Data were extracted from the Renal Anaemia Management database for the period of 2007–2009. These data were compared with the target levels described in the CARI guidelines. Results Most patients were not achieving recommended haemoglobin, ferritin or transferrin saturation levels. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were less likely to achieve targets. Conclusions Iron guidelines are not translating into good clinical practice for patients on HD. This situation may be improved by updating the CARI guidelines (as has recently been carried out for haemoglobin targets), introduction of more consistent dosing protocols across hospitals and greater assessment of safe levels of cumulative iron and ferritin.

SUMMARY Background Indigenous Australians have significantly higher rates of end-stage renal disease and worse health outcomes than non-indigenous Australians. Objectives We investigated whether the effect of inflammation on C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin levels is being overlooked in indigenous patients with chronic kidney disease. Design Data for 23,000 patients were extracted from the Renal Anaemia Management database for the period November 1999 to October 2010. Measurement Haemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation and CRP levels for indigenous and non-indigenous Australians were compared with target levels given in the Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment (CARI) guidelines. Results Compared with non-indigenous patients, indigenous Australians had higher median CRP and mean ferritin levels, lower mean haemoglobin level and were less likely to meet CARI targets. Conclusion The effect of inflammation on laboratory parameters should be considered particularly when treating indigenous Australians.

Aim To determine whether there is a sex difference in placebo and ibuprofen analgesia expectancy. Methods We measured detection and tolerance thresholds for electrically induced pain in the ear lobe in healthy subjects (10 male, 10 female) to study sex differences in expectancy following either ibuprofen 800 mg or placebo in four different expectancy states. Subjects took ibuprofen or placebo in a two-by-two factorial design (the balanced placebo design). We randomly assigned subjects to start in one of the four expectancy states. We analysed the results using analysis of variance for repeated measures with baseline pain as a covariate. Results and conclusion We found no sex difference in baseline pain threshold or tolerance levels. When partitioned by sex and expectancy state, analgesia only occurred in males during positive expectancy states at 2, 3 and 4 h post-placebo, and at 1 and 2 h post-ibuprofen. The time course of analgesic action in males was as expected considering the pharmacokinetic profile of ibuprofen. Our study found that dosages of 800 mg of ibuprofen are ineffective in producing analgesia in women regardless of their expectations. We hypothesize that ibuprofen analgesia is produced by a combination of specific pharmacological effects and a non-specific beta endorphin-mediated placebo effect. Whatever the mechanism responsible for the analgesic response seen in males, this research re-emphasizes the importance of psychological factors in determining drug response. It also shows that these factors can differ between men and women, and thus the contribution of psychological factors on analgesia needs to be seriously re-evaluated.

Background: Carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) is FDA-approved for the treatment relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on data from the ASPIRE study (Stewart K et al. NEJM 2015). Thalidomide, a first generation immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) is less costly than lenalidomide and is synergistic in combination with proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of MM. ALLG MM018/ AMN003 is an open label phase II study of carfilzomib thalidomide and dexamethasone (KTd) for patients with RRMM. The primary end point is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), safety and health related quality of life. Method: Eligible patients were those with RRMM who have had 1-3 prior lines of treatment. The KTd regimen consisted of carfilzomib [20mg/m2 IV C1D1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from C1D8 onwards], thalidomide (100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, thalidomide was omitted and Kd [carfilzomib 56mg/m2 (36/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,2,15,16 and dexamethasone 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,15 every 28 days]was continued for a further 6 cycles. Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate and trephine for correlative studies were collected from the first 30 patients, at baseline, after cycle 6 and at confirmed disease progression. The aim of the correlative study was to assess for immunological correlates to clinical outcome. Immunological parameters that will be assessed include NK and T cells subsets on peripheral blood via mass cytometry (CyTOF). On the bone marrow trephine, NK cells, T cells, GRP78 expression within CD38 positive plasma cells, PD1 and PDL1 expression will be assessed at the myeloma site and the surrounding microenvironment using OPAL multiplex immunohistochemistry technology. Results: Between March 2017 to June 2018, 56 patients (median age 66 years, range 56-79; 77% Caucasian and 23% Asian) out of the planned 100 were enrolled, with a median follow up of 4.9 (range, 1.0-13.7) months. Response rates in 39 evaluable patients were ≥MR (97%), ≥PR (89%) and ≥VGPR (66%). Median PFS is not reached, and no patients with ≥MR have relapsed. Grade ≥3/4 AEs occurred in 56% of patients, the most common of which were peripheral sensory neuropathy (13%), dyspnoea (13%) and infections (7%). All grade cardiovascular AEs included dyspnoea (27%), cardiac complications (5%), systemic-hypertension (9%) and pulmonary-hypertension (1.9%), however very few were grade ≥3. Three patients have died on study from disease complications, haemorrhage, and primary cardiac ischaemic event. Thus far, we have not found a significant difference in rates or profile of adverse events between the Caucasian versus Asian subgroups of patients. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis demonstrates that the KTd combination is a tolerable regimen for patients with RRMM with a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. Initial response rates appear very promising and durable with responses up to 13.7 months thus far in some patients. Patient accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Quach: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Janssen-Cilag: Other: Scientific advisory board. Mollee:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Durie:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Chng:ASLAN Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Aim: To determine the proportion of patients achieving tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations of ≥10 ng/mL within 3 days of kidney transplantation, after randomization either to standard dosing (control group) or post-transplantation dosing guided by a 2-hour (C2) level following a preoperative tacrolimus dose (T2 group). Methods: The first postoperative tacrolimus dose was given either according to standard care (control group) or 0.15 mg/kg b.d. if the pre-transplant C2 level was ≤20 ng/mL, 0.1 mg/kg b.d. if the C2 level was 21–59 ng/mL or 0.05 mg/kg b.d. if the C2 level was ≥60 ng/mL (T2 group). Subsequent dosing in both groups was based upon tacrolimus trough level monitoring. Participants received concomitant mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Results: Ninety patients were recruited, of which 84 were included in the analysis (control group n = 43; T2 group n = 41). There was no difference in the proportion of subjects achieving tacrolimus trough levels ≥10 ng/mL (82.9% Control vs 93.0% T2; P = 0.19) or between 10 and 15 ng/mL (41.5% Control vs 41.9% T2; P = 0.97) at day 3 post transplant. The T2 group achieved tacrolimus trough levels of ≥10 ng/mL significantly faster than the control group (100% achievement in 14 days (Control) versus 4 days (T2); P = 0.01). Conclusion: Performing a pre-transplant tacrolimus C2 does not significantly increase the high proportion of subjects achieving 10 ng/mL tacrolimus concentrations by day 3 using routine protocols. However, compared with standard care, performing a pre-transplant tacrolimus C2 does lead to patients achieving a whole-blood concentration of ≥10 ng/mL sooner.

Patients on haemodialysis (HD) have greater iron needs than the normal population. In 2004, the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI) group audited six Australian renal centres and found considerable variability in achievement of iron and haemoglobin targets.The aim of this study was to determine whether intravenous iron guidelines and evidence translate into good clinical outcomes for patients on HD.Data were extracted from the Renal Anaemia Management database for the period of 2007-2009. These data were compared with the target levels described in the CARI guidelines.Most patients were not achieving recommended haemoglobin, ferritin or transferrin saturation levels. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were less likely to achieve targets.Iron guidelines are not translating into good clinical practice for patients on HD. This situation may be improved by updating the CARI guidelines (as has recently been carried out for haemoglobin targets), introduction of more consistent dosing protocols across hospitals and greater assessment of safe levels of cumulative iron and ferritin.

Anaemia often goes unrecognised in people with early chronic kidney disease (CKD) resulting in under treatment until reaching the need for dialysis.This study aimed to determine if anaemia is adequately treated in Australians with CKD, who do not require dialysis.Haemoglobin, ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) data for patients with Stage 2-4 CKD were extracted from the Renal Anaemia Management database for the period 1999-2010. The data were compared with the target levels specified in the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment guidelines.Less than 50% of the patients achieved the recommended haemoglobin levels, and even fewer patients achieved the levels recommended for ferritin and TSAT.More emphasis should be placed on detection and treatment of anaemia in earlier stages of kidney disease. Poor response to erythropoiesis stimulating agent therapy should be investigated in this group and any identified causes of poor response treated.

This study examined whether a change infrequency of administration of erythropoietin-stimulating agent affected hemoglobin levels in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Data were extracted from the Australian Renal Anaemia Management database for the years 2002 and 2008. Less frequent dosing and increasing age were associated with higher hemoglobin levels, while increasing ferritin levels and later years were associated with lower hemoglobin levels.

Indigenous Australians have significantly higher rates of end-stage renal disease and worse health outcomes than non-indigenous Australians.We investigated whether the effect of inflammation on C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin levels is being overlooked in indigenous patients with chronic kidney disease.Data for 23,000 patients were extracted from the Renal Anaemia Management database for the period November 1999 to October 2010.Haemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation and CRP levels for indigenous and non-indigenous Australians were compared with target levels given in the Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment (CARI) guidelines.Compared with non-indigenous patients, indigenous Australians had higher median CRP and mean ferritin levels, lower mean haemoglobin level and were less likely to meet CARI targets.The effect of inflammation on laboratory parameters should be considered particularly when treating indigenous Australians.

The TIDEL-II trial used imatinib (IM) upfront in patients (pts) newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and switched selected pts to nilotinib (NIL) on the basis of IM intolerance or failure to achieve time-dependent molecular response. We previously reported major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL ≤0.1% IS) at 12 months (mths) and transformation-free survival (TFS) at 3 years. This abstract reports the final analysis with minimum follow-up of 60 months. Patients were enrolled across 27 Australasian sites in 2 equal and sequential cohorts. All started treatment with IM 600mg OD and dose escalated to IM 800mg OD if IM trough levels were The study enrolled 210 pts with a median age of 49.7 years (range 16-81); 42% were female. Baseline demographics and outcomes were similar across 2 cohorts. Forty pts had day 22 IM trough At 60 mths, 75 (36%) pts had withdrawn from study, and 14 were lost to follow up (including 12 with outstanding data queries). Of the 121 pts (58%) who remained on TIDEL-II until 60 mths, 33 were on NIL (30 in MMR), 77 on IM (76 in MMR); treatment was unknown for 11 (10 in MMR). The median dose of IM was 600mg OD. Of the 51 pts who dose escalated to IM 800mg OD (31 for low IM trough level and 20 for failing to achieve molecular targets), only 9 remained on this dose until mth 60 (5 and 4 pts form the respective groups). Eight pts transformed to accelerated or blastic phase; 5 within the 1st year, 2 in the 3rd and 1 in the 5th year; 2/8 occurred after study withdrawal. There were 14 deaths, mostly due to cardiac events (n=5) or progressive leukaemia (n=6). In all, 13/210 pts (6%) had cardiac, cerebral or peripheral vascular disease, 9 while on NIL and 4 having only had IM. Pts failing to meet molecular targets (analysed according to the 1st target failed) at 3, 6 and 12 mths numbered 25 (12%), 23 (11%) and 30 (14%) respectively with 19, 16 and 20 switching to NIL (subsequent molecular outcomes, Table 2). Pts failing to achieve EMR had poor achievement of MMR and MR4.5 (44% and 8% respectively by 60 mths). Of the 11 EMR failure pts who achieved MMR, only 4 remained in MMR at 60 mths. Pts failing to achieve BCR-ABL≤ 1% at 6 mths had similarly poor outcomes, with MMR and MR4.5 being 52% and 13% respectively. In pts failing to achieve MMR by 12 months, MMR and MR4.5 by 60 mths were 93% and 33% respectively. Twenty pts switched to NIL for IM intolerance prior to 24 mths: 9/20 already in MMR, and 3/20 already in MR4.5 at time of switching. For the remaining pts, MMR and MR4.5 were achieved by 100% and 88% after switching. The TIDEL-II strategy of combining IM and NIL compares favourably with other upfront treatment strategies, with MR4.5 of 59% by 60 mths. IM dose escalation to 800mg OD for target failure was not well tolerated: only 18% of pts who dose escalated maintained this dose at 60 mths. However, this did not appear to be detrimental to overall outcomes, which were similar in the 2 cohorts. Pts switching to NIL for IM intolerance, and for failing to achieve MMR by 12 months after meeting prior goals, had high rates of MMR, superior to those who failed their 3 and 6 mth targets. Early identification of pts at high risk of EMR failure who might benefit from more intensive or experimental therapies may be necessary to further improve outcomes. Disclosures Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria; Cepheid: Consultancy. Butcher:Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gottlieb:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Indee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arthur:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Tam:Novartis: Honoraria. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Hughes:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Background This observational study was designed to collect treatment outcomes data in patients using the electronic Schizophrenia Treatment Adherence Registry (e-STAR). Methods Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in Australia who were prescribed risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) between 2003 and 2007 were assessed 12-months retrospectively, at baseline and 24-months prospectively at 3-monthly intervals. The intent-to-treat population, defined as all patients who received at least one dose of RLAI at baseline, was used for the efficacy and safety analyses. Results At total of 784 patients (74% with schizophrenia, 69.8% male) with a mean age of 37.1 ± 12.5 years and 10.6 ± 9.5 years since diagnosis were included in this Australian cohort. A significant improvement in mean Clinical Global Impression - severity score was observed at 24-months (4.52 ± 1.04 at baseline, 3.56 ± 1.10 at 24-months). Most of this improvement was seen by 3-months and was also reflected in mean Global Assessment of Functioning score, which improved significantly at 24-months (42.9 ± 14.5 at baseline, 59 ± 15.4 at 24-months). For patients still receiving RLAI at 24-months there was an increase from a mean baseline RLAI dose of 26.4 ± 5 mg to 43.4 ± 15.7 mg. Sixty-six percent of patients discontinued RLAI before the 24-month period--this decreased to 46% once patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Conclusion Over the 24-month period, initiation of RLAI was associated with improved patient functioning and illness severity in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Improved outcomes were observed early and sustained throughout the study. Trial Registration Clinical Trials Registration Number, NCT00283517.

Background: Bortezomib has been shown to be a safe and efficacious for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report a subset analysis of Australian and New Zealand data from the International Extended Access Programme for bortezomib. Methods: Patients with more than or equal to two prior lines of therapy were given bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus days 1, 4, 8, 11) for up to eight 21-day cycles (C). Dexamethasone, 20 mg/day p. o. on the day of, and day after, bortezomib was added after C2 for progressive disease or after C4 for stable disease. Efficacy was assessed using modified Southwest Oncology Group criteria in the intent-to-treat group. Results were compared between the Australian and New Zealand and international cohort. Results: One hundred and eleven patients from 16 centres (55% men, median age 61.9 years) had a median of 5.2 ± 2.8 treatment cycles of bortezomib. Among them, 82% had ≥3 prior therapies. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 57 patients (52%); the most common were thrombocytopenia (25.7%), anaemia (8.3%), peripheral neuropathy (7.3%) and diarrhoea (7.3%). Responses were evaluable in 106 patients: 22% achieved a best response of complete response/response and 20% partial response (overall response rate of 42%). Median times to first and best responses were 42 days and 69 days, respectively. Compared with the international cohort, the cohorts from Australian and New Zealand showed inferior overall response rates (54 vs 42%, P = 0.001), possibly due to heavier pretreatment (82% greater than or equal to three prior therapies vs 68%, P

SUMMARY: Background: Cyclosporine-induced side-effects such as gum enlargement and hirsutism potentially limit its effectiveness as a calcineurin-antagonist if these effects contribute to a lack of compliance. Although the differences in incidence of these effects are widely recognized, few studies are available to show the extent of reduced gum enlargement and hirsutism in patients converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety and patient-reported outcomes of such conversions. Methods: Twenty-one consecutive cyclosporine-treated renal-transplant recipients with evidence of gingival enlargement were randomized into two arms: 10 continued to receive cyclosporine, 11 were converted to tacrolimus. Mean differences (0–3, 0–6, 0–9 and 0–12 months) in periodontal indices (gingival inflammation, plaque, pocket depth, gingival enlargement), hirsutism, serum creatinine and glucose and subjective differences in the patient's rating of disfigurement due to hirsutism and gingival enlargement were recorded. Results: There were no differences in baseline periodontal scores between the two groups. Tacrolimus-treated subjects had significantly reduced pocket depth and gingival enlargement measures (Pocket Depths: −0.40 ± 0.58 vs 0.30 ± 0.35, P

Introduction: Early ASCT improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in poor prognosis DLBCL treated with R-CHOP immuno-chemotherapy (Stiff P et al., NEJM 2013). Furthermore, indiscriminate ASCT exposes those poor-risk patients destined to remain in CR with R-CHOP alone to unnecessary toxicity. Here, the role of interim PET/CT to risk-stratify is controversial. One confounding factor is that interim PET/CT is typically performed after 2 (or 3) cycles of chemotherapy when FDG-avidity likely reflects a mix of residual cancer cells and inflammation; in contrast, interim PET/CT after cycle 4 may be more representative of resistant lymphoma. We hypothesized that: 1. assessment of DLBCL patients by interim PET/CT after 4 cycles (iPET4) of R-CHOP-14 allows greater specificity of FDG-avidity; and, 2. for patients with iPET4-positivity, early treatment intensification with R-ICE chemotherapy followed by Zevalin-BEAM conditioning and ASCT results in 2-yr PFS that is equivalent to interim-PET/CT-negative patients treated with R-CHOP alone. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter phase 2 study which enrolled DLBCL patients ≤ 70 yrs with either IPI=2-5, or IPI =0-1 with tumor bulk (≥ 7.5 cm), and who were considered fit for ASCT. All patients underwent a diagnostic PET/CT at study entry and were planned to receive 4 cycles of R-CHOP-14 and supported with Pegfilgrastim. Cycle 5 of R-CHOP-14 was delayed 7 days, and an interim PET/CT scan was undertaken at d17-d20 post-4th R-CHOP-14, the delay intended to reduce the impact of rebound inflammation after R-CHOP. All interim PET/CT scans were assessed centrally by a core group of imaging specialists using International Harmonization Project (IHP) criteria with mediastinal blood pool as the reference. Biopsy to confirm residual tumor was not mandated. iPET4-positive patients received 3 cycles of R-ICE followed by ASCT with Zevalin-BEAM conditioning; those who were iPET4-negative received a further 2 cycles of R-CHOP-14 plus 2 doses of Rituximab. Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled from 20 Australian centers; 11 patients were excluded because of failure to meet inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics of the 151 evaluable patients included: median age 57 yrs (range, 21 to 69), 40% aged > 60 yrs, 62% males, 79% stages 3 or 4, 13% ECOG PS > 1, 78% elevated LDH, 48% extranodal sites > 1, 54% bulky disease ≥ 7.5 cm, 20% IPI=0-1, 27% IPI=2, 31% IPI=3, and 23% IPI=4-5. No interim PET/CT scan was performed in 8 patients due to progressive disease (PD) (1), bowel perforation (2), toxicity (3), and dose delays ≥ 2 weeks (2). Interim PET/CT scans were undertaken at d17-d20 in 62% and d14-d16 in another 23%. Of the 143 patients with interim PET/CT, 101 (71%) were deemed iPET4-negative and 42 (29%) were iPET4-positive. Interestingly, the baseline characteristics were comparable between iPET4-negative and iPET4-positive patients. Of the 101 iPET4-negative patients, 5 failed to complete therapy due to PD (3), toxicity (1), or infection (1). Of the 42 iPET4-positive patients, 10 failed to complete intensification therapy due to PD (6), 2nd malignancy (1), or consent withdrawal (3). Among iPET4-positive patients undergoing ASCT, there was 1 treatment-related death due to viral infection. At a median follow-up of 35 months, the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate of 2-yr PFS and OS for the entire eligible cohort of 151 pts was 72% and 85%, respectively. For the 101 iPET4-negative and 42 iPET4-positive patients, 2-yr PFS was 74% and 67% (P =0.32) (Figure 1), and 2-yr OS was 88% and 78% (P=0.11) (Figure 2), respectively. Among iPET4-negative and iPET4-positive patients with IPI=3-5, 2-yr PFS was 65% and 69% (P=0.74), and 2-yr OS was 81% and 83% (P =0.85), respectively. Conclusions: Patients with poor risk DLBCL who are interim PET/CT-positive after 4 cycles of R-CHOP-14 and switched to intensification with R-ICE followed by ASCT with Zevalin-BEAM have favorable rates of PFS and OS that are equivalent to that seen for patients who are interim PET/CT-negative. This study supports further investigation of treatment intensification in patients with poor risk DLBCL who are interim PET/CT-positive after 4 cycles of immuno-chemotherapy. The study was supported in part by Roche Products Pty. Ltd, Amgen Australia Pty. Ltd, and Bayer Australia Ltd. Figure 1. Progression Free Survival by Interim PET/CT Figure 1. Progression Free Survival by Interim PET/CT Figure 2. Overall survival by Interim PET/CT Figure 2. Overall survival by Interim PET/CT Disclosures Hertzberg: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gill:AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Ho:Celgene: Other: Travel. Cull:Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Other: Travel. Grigg:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lewis:Amgen: Other: Travel; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel. Renwick:Amgen: Other: Travel; Bayer: Speakers Bureau. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Phebra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 4065 Background: Amplification of chromosome 1q occurs in 40% of myeloma and predicts lower response to induction regimens. We assessed if a PAD regimen overcomes effects of 1q amplification on overall response rate (ORR), event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly-diagnosed, transplant-eligible myeloma. Methods: This phase II trial enrolled 107 patients, stratified by 1q amplification. All could receive 4× 21-day cycles of PAD induction: bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 D 1,4,8,11; doxorubicin 20mg/m2 D1,4; dexamethasone 20mg D1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12. Responders proceeded to melphalan 200mg/m2 and ASCT. ORR after PAD was primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included ORR 3 monthspost-ASCT, and 2-year EFS and OS. Results: 22% (20/93 evaluable cases) had amplified 1q. Median PAD cycles was4. ORRs were similar in amplified and non-amplified cases (100% vs. 87% post-PAD; 100% vs. 93% post-ASCT). After median 2 years, 2-year EFS was similar in amplified and non-amplified cases (70% vs. 75%; log-rank p=0.86), but with a trend to lower 2-year OS in amplified cases (86% vs. 94%; log-rank p=0.28). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included constipation (0% vs. 8% of patients), neutropenia (12% vs. 4% of patients), anaemia (4% vs. 6% of patients), back pain (4% vs. 6% of patients), neuralgia (0% vs. 6% of patients) and neuropathy (8% vs. 4%). Conclusions: Four cycles of PAD induced high response rates in both 1q amplified and non-amplified myeloma with acceptable toxicity. After 2 years, EFS was also similar, but with a non-significant trend to lower OS in patients with 1q amplification. Funding: This study is sponsored by Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd, Australia. Trial Registration: ACTRN12609000296235. Disclosures: Joshua: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Hertzberg:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Auguston:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Spencer:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Horvath:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Bashford:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Campbell:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Ashurst:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Employment. Wade:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Employment. Copeman:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Employment. Butcher:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Consultancy. Prince:Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding.