Search

The effects of the ACE inhibitor cilazapril (5 mg p.o.) and the alpha 1- adrenoceptor blocker prazosin (2 mg p.o.) were investigated on the dose- response curves to angiotensin I and to noradrenaline, administered locally in the hand veins in six healthy male volunteers in doses not producing systemic effects. Both angiotensin I and noradrenaline produced a dose-dependent constriction of the congested veins. The angiotensin I effects were completely abolished after the administration of cilazapril but not significantly altered after the administration of prazosin. The noradrenaline dose-response curves were shifted to the right (dose ratio about 10) by prazosin, but not by cilazapril. The data suggest that angiotensin I, after having been converted to angiotensin II exerts direct venoconstrictor effects which under resting conditions are not mediated by noradrenaline release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1. The aim of the studies was to develop a new methodology to estimate the pharmacodynamic properties and potency of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in man. 2. Angiotensin I dose-response curves were derived by continuous infusion of angiotensin I in increasing dose steps; steady state was reached within 3 min. 3. Interaction between angiotensin I (agonist) and ACE inhibitors (antagonist) was characterized according to Schild-plot methodology by measuring agonist dose-response curves using diastolic blood pressure in the absence and the presence of varying doses of the antagonist. 4. Cilazapril shifted the angiotensin I dose-response curves to the right. A twofold shift (apparent Ki-dose) was observed with approximately 0.6 mg cilazapril. 5. The effect of angiotensin I on diastolic blood pressure was determined before and up to 36 h after administration of 25 mg captopril, 10 mg enalapril, 4 mg cilazapril and a placebo orally. The pharmacodynamic half-life of captopril was about 2 h, whereas the effect of enalapril and cilazapril was about 4 h. 6. Angiotensin I dose- response curves are useful methods of investigating the pharmacodynamic properties of ACE-inhibitors in man. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1. Six healthy subjects received cilazapril (2.5 mg once daily), propranolol (120 mg once daily), the combination of both and placebo for a period of 1 week each (wash-out phase 1 week). 2. Propranolol and cilazapril reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) by 7 mm Hg at peak when compared with placebo. However after the combination, this reduction was more than doubled (18 mm Hg) and lasted longer. 3. There was a trend to lower and later peak concentrations for both drugs after administration of the combination. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between cilazapril and propranolol were found. 4. The effects on blood pressure were confirmed in hypertensive patients (BP diastolic greater than 95 mm Hg). Thirteen patients were randomly allocated cilazapril (2.5 mg day-1) or propranolol (120 mg day- 1] as part of a cross-over design. This was then followed by the combination. All treatment periods were of 3 weeks duration and all measurements were done 2 h after drug administration. 5. Cilazapril lowered the median sitting diastolic BP by 8 mm Hg, and propranolol by 9 mm Hg, whereas the combination reduced the diastolic BP by 19 mm Hg. 6. The results of these studies, attempting to elucidate drug-drug interactions, showed that combined use of propranolol and cilazapril resulted in a more pronounced and longer lasting blood pressure reduction, in healthy subjects and in patients with hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1. The purpose of the present studies was to compare the pharmacodynamic profile of the new ACE inhibitor cilazapril with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol in healthy subjects and in hypertensive patients. 2. Hormonal and haemodynamic responses at rest and after pharmacological interventions with angiotensin I and isoprenaline were investigated in six healthy volunteers following a 1 week treatment with placebo, propranolol (120 mg day-1) and cilazapril (2.5 mg day-1) in a double-blind cross over design with a wash-out period of 1 week between the different treatments. 3. Cilazapril induced a pronounced increase of plasma renin activity and angiotensin I concentrations, whereas after propranolol both parameters decreased. After both compounds slight decreases in angiotensin II concentrations were found. After the pharmacological challenges with angiotensin I and isoprenaline specific effects of the ACE inhibitor and beta- adrenoceptor blocker were found respectively. 4. Seventeen hypertensive patients received after a 2 week placebo period in random order cilazapril (2.5 mg day-1) or propranolol (120 mg day-1) for 3 weeks. A cross over design switched the patients to the other treatment. On the last day of each treatment period blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance were determined at rest and during handgrip test. In addition, bicycle exercise test was done and blood lactate concentrations were determined. 5. At rest blood pressure was lowered by both drugs, but total peripheral resistance increased after propranolol and decreased after cilazapril. After hand grip test, blood pressure was lowered after both drugs, but peripheral resistance decreased only after cilazapril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1. The pharmacokinetics, hormonal and haemodynamic responses at rest and during challenges with angiotensin I (blood pressure), isoprenaline (heart rate), and noradrenaline (blood pressure) were investigated in six healthy male volunteers following a 1 week treatment with placebo, propranolol (120 mg day-1), cilazapril (2, 5 mg day-1), and a combination of both in a double-blind cross-over design. 2. Both drugs reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mm Hg as compared with placebo. After coadministration, this drop in blood pressure was doubled and lasted longer than after the administration of the individual components. 3. Following cilazapril, a pronounced increase in plasma renin activity (PRA) was found (factor approximately 10 at drug peak concentrations). Coadministration of both drugs resulted only in a moderate increase in the PRA (factor approximately 3). Significant changes in plasma catecholamines were not observed. 4. Propranolol shifted the isoprenaline dose-effect curve to the right, and cilazapril that of angiotensin I, irrespective of the presence of the other drug. Cilazapril tended to shift the noradrenaline dose- effect curve somewhat to the right. 5. The gain of the baroreceptor reflex (angiotensin-stimulation) was not influenced by cilazapril but was lowered by propranolol, irrespective of the presence of the ACE inhibitor. 6. Except for a statistically not significant decrease in the peak concentrations of each drug during the combined therapy, a pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs was not found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dose-response curves of the effect of angiotensin I (A-I) infusion on diastolic blood pressure were constructed before and 3 h following single oral doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril (1.25 to 30 mg) in six normal male subjects. Cilazapril shifted the A-I dose-response curves dose dependently rightward; Schild- plot analysis indicated a competitive antagonism by cilazapril with an apparent Ki-dose of about 0.6 mg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) commonly used in the prevention and treatment of arteriosclerotic angiopathies is equal to or less than 100 mg daily. This choice of dose is predominantly based on molecular-pharmacological findings showing an inhibition in synthesis of the prothrombotic thromboxane (TXB2) and an irreversible inhibition in blood platelet aggregation. However, an analysis of ASA dose-effect relationships for doses of 50 - 500 mg (PO and IV) shows that doses of ASA up to 100 mg daily produce only a small or moderate inhibition in collagen/epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation and have no significant effect on the important platelet factors, PF3 and PF4. Doses of ASA 300 - 500 mg, on the other hand, inhibit platelet aggregation almost completely and, in addition, produce a 50 - 70% inhibition in PF3 and PF4 lasting at least 24 hours. There is also evidence that doses of ASA above 100 mg daily markedly inhibit thromboxane synthesis for up to 24 hours and that doses of 500 mg daily produce a clinically relevant inhibition in platelet adhesion to vessel walls for up 72 hours and prevent procoagulatory shape changes for up to 12 hours. These findings suggest that a dose of ≥ 300 mg at intervals of 2 - 3 days would be more appropriate for primary and secondary prophylaxis of arteriosclerotic angiopathies and that the benefit-risk ratio would be greater because of the increased availability of mucoprotective prostaglandins, PGI2 (prostacyclin) and the gastroprotective, PGE2. Our viewpoint, predominantly based on findings with biomarkers, could serve as a basis for further randomized controlled studies.

Moderate alcohol consumption and in particular wine consumption, is associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in epidemiological studies. Although no randomized placebo-controlled studies with wine intervention exist - and will probably never exist - the observed association can be interpreted as causal due to the existing high biological plausibility. There is more and more evidence that ethanol per se contributes to the most relevant preventive effects. When consumed in moderation the health benefits outweigh the health risks. Whether and to what extend the numerous plant compounds of wine (polyphenolic substances) can provide additional health benefits is still under investigation., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Vitamin D3 shows a multitude of possible preventive effects in various diseases. Calcitriol, the biologically active form of vitamin D3, affects not only bone metabolism but also acts on the renal renin secretion, the pancreatic insulin production in the beta cells, growth and proliferation of smooth and cardiac muscle cells and the function of lymphocytes and macrophages. Although the human body can synthesise vitamin D3 itself, vitamin D deficiency is common in the German population. Numerous trials studied the association between vitamin D deficiency and different diseases. It is known that even mild forms of vitamin D deficiency increase the risk for cardiovascular diseases or diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, an association with cancer such as pancreatic or colorectal cancer was observed. This is attributed to the influence of vitamin D on cell differentiation, angiogenesis, DNA repair mechanisms and the transcription of numerous genes. In addition, effects of vitamin D deficiency in diseases such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and autoimmune diseases are discussed. However, up to now the level of evidence of all these observations is low. There are missing confirmatory randomized controlled trials. Noting the possible preventive effects of vitamin D, a moderate exposure to sunlight to increase vitamin D synthesis can be recommended. Even a controlled supplementation of vitamin D in patients with vitamin D deficiency is considered as reasonable. However, an uncritical substitution of high-dose vitamin D should be avoided because of the risk of hypercalcaemia., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

It has been shown that the consumption of cocoa has a positive influence on a number of cardiovascular surrogate parameters such as arterial vasodilatation and a moderate decrease in blood pressure in humans. In the blood, a decrease in platelet aggregation and an increase in angiogenetic progenitor cells was noted. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory effects, an amelioration of the lipid profile and glucose metabolism was described. An increase of endothelial NO production following the ingestion of the antioxidant cocoa flavanols catechin and epicatechin seems to be the leading mechanism causing these effects. In animal studies of myocardial reperfusion, a decrease in infarct size was noted. In several prospective cohort studies from Europe and the United States, a 50 % reduction of mortality mostly due to a reduction of myocardial infarction was published. Consumption up to about 25 g daily of a flavanol rich dark chocolate (ca. 85 % cocoa content) can be recommended for cardiovascular prevention. In this moderate dosage, the potentially harmful effects due to weight gain and cadmium intake will be minimal. However, controlled randomized trials with well defined clinical endpoints are needed to prove the positive effects described so far. At this point, in time based on the information described in this article, a moderate consumption of flavanol rich cocoa products seems to be effective in the prevention of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The 'Schild regression' method is based on the principle of assessing the rightward shift of agonist dose-effect curves in the presence of different doses/concentrations of the respective receptor antagonist and presenting their relationship in a double log plot (i.e. the 'Schild plot'). The original method was developed to quantitatively characterize antagonistic drugs in experimental pharmacology. The method was adopted for evaluation of various AT1 antagonists in humans utilizing (human) angiotensin II as the agonist. Angiotensin II (Ang II) in continuous intravenous dose-incremental administration resulted in a clearly dose-dependent increase in blood pressure. All AT1 antagonists tested after oral administration yielded concentration-dependent rightward shifts of those Ang II dose-effect curves that were quantified as dose ratio (DR). DR minus 1 (DR-1) enabled the assessment of antagonist time kinetics in humans and a quantitatively precise determination of the half-life of antagonism in vivo. Schild plots allowed for assessment of apparent Ki doses indicative of a twofold rightward shift of the Ang II effect, thus providing the means for a rational comparison of the pharmacological potency of many of these compounds, where the Ki doses obtained at 24 h after administration were in the range of 'therapeutic' doses. Schild plots of a variety of substances showed linear relations independent of whether the blockade was deemed surmountable or not. It is therefore assumed that this property does not play a role at clinical doses/concentrations. Slopes slightly below 1 in the Schild plots of all tested antagonists point to a second 'counterregulatory' vasodilatory mechanism of action of Ang II which becomes apparent with AT1 blockade in conditions of high doses/concentrations of Ang II. Concentration vs. effect relationships indicate that if assessed at the same degree of direct vascular antagonism, other effects, such as increase in plasma renin activity, may be present to a varying degree with different antagonists. Thus for irbesartan, the potency to stimulate renin release was found to be at least twice that of candesartan. These observations should stimulate further research into the relevance of these dynamic differences between the various compounds. Thus, methodologies relying on fundamental principles of experimental pharmacology can provide the clinical pharmacologist with powerful tools to measure accurately degree of antagonism and time kinetics and to investigate the nature of receptor antagonism in humans.

Independent, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled studies using sublingual/oral administration of D-camphor, an extract from fresh crataegus berries, and a combination of the two (CCC) yielded the following results: Both the D-camphor and the extract from fresh crataegus berries, the components of CCC, contribute to the pressoric effects of the combination. The underlying hemodynamic mechanisms can be attributed to an increase in total peripheral resistance induced by an increased tone of the arterioles with both components and the effect of crataegus is intensified by an additional direct positive action on cardiac performance. Conceivably, the D-camphor component is the main factor in inducing the rapid initial effect, whereas the extract from fresh crataegus berries adds a long-lasting effect. For CCC, a dose-dependent increase in supine blood pressure and prevention of orthostatic fall in blood pressure following tilt table-induced orthostasis in patients with orthostatic dysregulation was demonstrated as well. The effect revealed a very rapid onset of action within 1 min following administration, confirming the traditional use in emergency situations such as orthostatic (pre)syncope. Thus, these studies show that CCC, depending on the pressoric activity of its two mono-components, exerts a significant effect that counteracts an orthostatic fall in blood pressure and thereby provides a rationale for its application that reemphasizes the decades-long usefulness of this phyto-combination.

In order to test the efficacy of a combination of natural D-camphor and an extract of fresh crataegus berries (Korodin Herz-Kreislauf-Tropfen) on orthostatic hypotension, two similar, controlled, randomized studies were carried out in a balanced crossover design in 24 patients each with orthostatic dysregulation. The camphor-crataegus berry combination (CCC) was orally administered as a single regimen in 3 different dosages of 5 drops, 20 drops and 80 drops; a placebo with 20 drops of a 60% alcoholic solution served as control. Orthostatic hypotension was assessed with the tilt table test before and after medication. Source data of both studies were pooled and meta-analytically evaluated for all 48 patients. CCC drops decreased the orthostatic fall in blood pressure versus placebo, as almost uniformly established at all times by mean arterial pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Mean arterial pressure demonstrated the very fast onset of action by a clearly dose-dependent statistically significant effect even after 1-minute orthostasis. Increase of mean arterial pressure as compared to the orthostasis test before medication was on average 4.5 mmHg. CCC affected diastolic blood pressure after 1 minute of orthostasis in all dosages as compared to placebo. A statistically significant effect of the highest dose of 80 drops on diastolic blood pressure could be demonstrated after 1-, 3-, and 5-minute orthostasis. The hemodynamic findings of a stabilizing effect on arterial pressure in orthostasis corroborate the long-term medical experience with CCC and justify the indication orthostatic hypotension.

The in vivo effects of two unsurmountable angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) antagonists, irbesartan (150 mg) and candesartan (8 mg), were studied in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy men. The drugs' direct vascular effects were assessed as the rightward shift (dose ratio - 1) of angiotensin dose-effect curves on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Renal and adrenal effects were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentrations, and antagonistic concentration equivalents (n x Ki) in a radioligand rat lung receptor assay. Both drugs exerted similar substantial (> 30-fold) and long-lasting (> 2-fold 47 h after dosing) rightward shifts of the angiotensin II dose effect declining with half-lives of 15 h irbesartan and 12 h candesartan, respectively. Dose ratio - 1 versus n x Ki showed a linear relationship in Schild regression plots; both drugs increased PRA, decreased DBP, and suppressed aldosterone. The slopes of linear relationship between angiotensin antagonism (dose ratio - 1) and PRA increase were almost threefold steeper (p = 0.005) following irbesartan as compared with candesartan. The findings suggest that for the same degree of angiotensin II antagonism, irbesartan produces a greater increase in PRA than candesartan. These pharmacodynamic differences warrant further investigation and clarification.

Objective: The pharmacokinetic and dynamic interactions of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor imidapril with other therapeutic principles used in hypertension and heart failure were evaluated., Methods: In three separate, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way cross-over studies in healthy volunteers (n = 16 each), single oral doses of imidapril 10 mg (I), hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (H), bisoprolol 5 mg (B) and nilvadipine 8 mg (N) were administered as monotherapies, and in IH, IB and IN combinations. Plasma concentrations of imidaprilat and H were followed up to 48 h, those of B and N up to 24 h and area under the concentration time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax (tmax) were determined. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and non-invasive haemodynamics [total peripheral resistance (TPR, N and H), systolic time intervals (STI, N and H), and plasma renin activity (PRA)] were assessed up to 24 h., Results: There were no pharmacokinetic interactions between I plus H, B or N. Bioequivalence between single and combined administrations was verified for all investigational compounds [AUC point estimates (90% confidence interval CI): imidaprilat IH 109% (97.8, 122.8); IB 99.6% (91.2, 109.4); IN 105.7% (92.1, 121.3); H 96.6% (92.5, 100.8); B 103% (100.2, 105.8); N 98% (89, 108)]. The haemodynamic effects were mostly additive and without relevant pharmacodynamic interactions. I significantly reduced the BP by 5-8 mmHg, B by 4-8 mmHg and N by 4-6 mmHg. In addition, H induced a significant reduction of the preload as seen from STI, and B significantly reduced HR (-5 bpm). N induced a significant decrease in TPR (about 15% of baseline values) and showed corresponding changes in STI. PRA increased significantly following I alone (1.5-2.0 ng/ml/h), as well as combined with N (2.5 ng/ ml/h) or H (3.1 ng/ml/h). This increase was clearly blunted by the co-administration of B (0.6 ng/ml/h)., Conclusions: The combination of imidapril with a diuretic, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist or calcium-channel blocker seems a reasonable and safe treatment option when striving for additive pharmacodynamic effects not accompanied by relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.

Objective: To study the efficacy of coumarin/troxerutine for the protection of salivary glands and mucosa during irradiation., Design: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial., Setting: University hospital, Germany., Patients: 48 patients who had radiotherapy to the head and neck., Main Outcome Measures: Salivary gland scintigraphy and acute side-effects of radiotherapy (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score)., Results: 23 patients (11 experimental, 12 placebo) completed the study. The global efficacy measure combining scintigraphy and RTOG score favoured the experimental arm (P=0.07). The RTOG score showed significantly fewer acute side-effects of radiation in the experimental arm (P<0.05)., Conclusion: The results suggest that coumarin/troxerutine have a favourable effect in the treatment of radiogenic sialadenitis and mucositis.

Digitalis glycosides exert a positive inotropic effect, i.e. an increase in myocardial contractility associated with a prolongation of relaxation period, and glycosides lower the heart rate (negative chronotropic), impede stimulus conduction (negative dromotropic) and promote myocardial excitability (positive bathmotropic). They seem to influence the activities of both the vagal and the sympathetic systems. Digitalis glycosides that belong to different substance classes are closely comparable concerning pharmacodynamics but differ substantially in regard to pharmacokinetics. Digoxin and its derivatives are less lipophilic, show lower protein binding and shorter half-life, are mainly eliminated via the kidney and accumulate rather rapidly in cases of insufficient kidney function. Digitoxin is highly lipophilic and extensively bound to plasma proteins, has a longer half-life, is mainly eliminated in the metabolized state via urine and faeces and does not accumulate in kidney dysfunction. As a result of a more stable pharmacokinetic profile, the incidence of toxic side effects seems to be lower with digitoxin than with digoxin. Since the beginning of the 1990s, the antagonists of the RAAS qualified as the standard treatment for congestive heart failure, often in combination with diuretics, vasodilators or beta-antagonists. However, the important role of digitalis glycosides as therapeutic comedication or alternative was never denied, especially in atrial fibrillation with tachycardia. The PROVED and RADIANCE trials proved a detrimental effect of the withdrawal of digoxin therapy on exercise capacity, left-ventricular ejection fraction and clinical symptoms. The DIG trial revealed that digoxin comedication in sinus rhythm patients with congestive heart failure was associated with a lower morbidity (as taken from death or hospitalization because of worsening heart failure) and an unchanged overall mortality--being a unique feature among the available inotropic drugs. Comparable studies for digitoxin have not yet been performed but, because of its higher pharmacological stability, it might well be associated with even more advantages in this regard than digoxin.

Angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists (AIIRAs) have demonstrated efficacy similar to other classes of antihypertensive agents as well as "placebo-level" tolerability at all doses. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies provide a framework for understanding important intra-class dissimilarities. Disparity in antagonistic effects may be determined by in vivo responses to challenges of exogenous angiotensin II (Ang II) and by ex vivo/in vitro responses to a drug's biological activity by radioligand receptor assay (RRA). Two independent studies have been conducted in which irbesartan exhibited a more pronounced and longer-lasting antagonism to the effects of exogenous Ang II than losartan and valsartan. Comparative trials have indicated that both irbesartan and candesartan show greater clinical efficacy in lowering blood pressure than losartan. Recently, we have compared the Ang II antagonistic properties of irbesartan 150 mg/day and candesartan 8 mg/day. Both drugs block AT1 receptors with "insurmountable" antagonism and demonstrate a long duration of action. While both irbesartan and candesartan showed a similar degree of antagonistic activity in vivo, distinctly higher antagonistic activity in plasma was found for irbesartan by RRA at all time-points. Furthermore, plasma renin activity during periods with high antagonistic activity was significantly higher, and aldosterone levels following Ang II stimulation were blunted to a greater extent, following administration of irbesartan. In summary, in the doses tested, irbesartan exhibits the strongest antagonism when compared with losartan, valsartan and candesartan. This finding may have clinical implications.

Rationale: A quantitative technique was used to compare the pharmacological potency in healthy volunteers of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIA): candesartan cilexetil, losartan, irbesartan, valsartan, and telmisartan., Methods: In a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group (4x12 subjects) study, single oral doses of candesartan cilexetil 4, 8 and 16 mg, losartan potassium 25, 50 and 100 mg, valsartan 40, 80 and 160 mg, and irbesartan 75, 150 and 300 mg were administered on three consecutive days. Telmisartan 20, 40 and 80 mg was similarly evaluated in 12 volunteers in an open amendment. Angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonistic effects were determined in vivo from rightward shifts in Ang II dose-response curves for diastolic blood pressure (BP) and dose ratios were calculated. Apparent K(i)-doses, i.e. doses (in mg) required to induce a two-fold shift in Ang II dose-response curves (equivalent to approx. 50% blockade of receptors) were determined, using Schild regression analysis., Results: All treatments dose-dependently attenuated increases in diastolic BP induced by infusion of exogenous Ang II. Candesartan cilexetil appeared to have a more pronounced increase in effect following cumulative dosing. At 24 hours, apparent K(i)-doses were: candesartan cilexetil 6 mg, irbesartan 123 mg, valsartan 93.5 mg, and telmisartan 54 mg. It was not possible to determine an apparent K(i)-dose for losartan at 24 hours., Conclusion: Consistent with results from experimental pharmacology, candesartan cilexetil displayed the highest pharmacological potency (i.e. antagonistic activity per mg substance) of the AIIAs tested. Apparent K(i)-doses at 24 hours were within the dose range recommended for clinical use in patients with hypertension.

The angiotensin II antagonistic effects of candesartan and losartan were compared in-vivo after single and repeated doses. Effects were related to antagonistic activity in plasma. In this double-blind, crossover study, 12 healthy male volunteers received, in random order, daily oral doses of 8 mg candesartan cilexetil or 50 mg losartan for seven days. On day 1 and day 8, dynamics and kinetics were assessed up to 48 h after dosing. Antagonistic effect was determined from the antagonist-induced rightward shifts of the diastolic blood pressure response curves to exogenously administered angiotensin II measured as the dose ratio (DR). The antagonistic activity in plasma was measured using an ex-vivo/in-vitro radioreceptor assay. Specific high-performance liquid chromatography assays determined plasma concentrations of candesartan, losartan and its active metabolite EXP-3174. The pharmacokinetic properties of candesartan and losartan were comparable and antagonistic activity in plasma almost identical (ratio candesartan: losartan = 0.97 and 1-2 after single and multiple doses, respectively). However, the antagonistic effects of candesartan and losartan in-vivo were quite different. Twenty-four hours after single dosing with candesartan a clinically relevant rightward shift in the angiotensin II dose-response curve (DR= 3.2) occurred that was more pronounced than that following losartan administration (DR=2.1, ratio candesartan: losartan= 1.65). Twenty-four hours after multiple doses of candesartan or losartan, the values of the DR were 4.8 and 2.3, respectively (ratio candesartan: losartan = 1.94). The values of DR for candesartan were significantly higher compared with losartan between 6 and 36h after a single dose and between 3 and 24 h post-dose following multiple dose administration. A counter-clockwise hysteresis was apparent between antagonistic activity in plasma and antagonistic effect. Despite equivalent angiotensin II antagonistic activity in plasma, the pharmacodynamic effect of candesartan cilexetil was greater than that of losartan. Candesartan appeared to have a slower off-rate from the angiotensin AT1-receptor compared with losartan, nevertheless differences in distributional phenomena or the extent of insurmountable antagonistic activity cannot be ruled out.

Objectives: To compare the angiotensin II antagonistic properties of the usual recommended oral starting doses of various angiotensin II receptor antagonists-150 mg irbesartan, 80 mg valsartan, and 50 mg losartan-in humans., Subjects and Methods: Eighteen healthy men were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized crossover study. Angiotensin II dose-effect curves of diastolic blood pressure and radioreceptor assay were performed before and up to 47 hours after single and multiple doses of the antagonists. The rightward shift of the angiotensin II dose-effect curves (dose ratio-1) assessed the antagonistic effects in vivo. The degree of receptor occupancy in plasma was detected by a rat lung radioreceptor assay ex vivo in vitro., Results: All of the drugs clearly showed antagonistic effects to angiotensin II in vivo (dose ratio-1) and in vitro (radioreceptor assay). Within the given doses the dose ratio-1 for irbesartan was greater than for valsartan and losartan after single and repetitive dosing, reaching statistical significance at various time points up to 36 hours versus valsartan and up to 47 hours versus losartan. The apparent half-lives of the decay of the effects were approximately 8 hours for valsartan and losartan, whereas 15 to 18 hours were obtained with irbesartan. These findings were supported by the radioreceptor assay data: the percentage of receptor occupancy for irbesartan was significantly greater than for valsartan and losartan up to 47 hours., Conclusion: Angiotensin II antagonistic effects of irbesartan, valsartan, and losartan were compared. Irbesartan showed the slowest decay and longest duration of its antagonistic effects. With the recommended initial doses used in this study, the following rank order of antagonistic intensity was obtained: irbesartan > valsartan > losartan. The findings of this study, specifically the longer-lasting effects of irbesartan, may have clinical implications.

Aim: Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study to prove the efficacy of Coumarin/Troxerutine (Venalot Depot) for protection of salivary glands during a head and neck irradiation., Patients and Method: Forty-eight radiotherapy patients (60 Gy) with head and neck cancer were included in this trial. During radiotherapy the salivary glands were located in the core irradiation field. Primary efficacy parameters were sialometry, quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy and clinical evaluation of early effects of radiotherapy (RTOG-score, Table 1). All data were collected at 6 assessments: 1 week pre-radiation (U1), at start (U2), half time (U3) and end (U4) of irradiation, 8 days (U5) and 28 days (U6) after the end of irradiation (Figure 1)., Results: Twenty-three patients (11 verum, 12 placebo) completed the study with all assessments. Sialometrically, all patients were severely (half of radiotherapy) or completely (end of radiotherapy) xerostomatic (Figure 2). In a global efficacy measure according to O'Brien combining scintigraphy and RTOG there was a tendency for a higher efficacy of verum compared to placebo (p = 0.068). After start of irradiation therapy, the RTOG-score showed continuously and significantly lower early radiation effects under verum than under placebo (U3 vs U6: p < 0.05, area under curve: p = 0.032; Table 2, Figure 3). The scintigraphically determined excretion fraction was slightly less impaired in the verum group compared to the placebo treatment (p = 0.12. Figure 4). There was no difference in drug safety between placebo and verum for adverse events, changes in the activity of liver enzymes and for global impression of tolerability., Conclusions: The results give support for an advantageous effect of Venalot Depot in the treatment of radiogenic sialadenitis and mucositis. In even a small number of evaluable patients, early clinical effects of irradiation (RTOG-score) were less pronounced in the active treatment group than in the placebo group, but the sample size was too low to prove statistically also the benefit of coumarin/troxerutine with the scintigraphic method. Sialometry seems not suitable for the assessment of early radiation effects.

Aortic stiffening is as much an important risk factor in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as it serves as reliable surrogate marker for clinical endpoints like myocardial and cerebrovascular incidents. Elevated aortic stiffness induces high systolic blood pressure, augmented pulse pressure with increased ventricular afterload, reduced subendocardial blood flow and augmented pulsatile stress in the peripheral arteries. Factors with relevant impact on the epidemiology of arterial stiffness are widely spread. 3 major groups of parameters influencing the stiffness of the aorta and the large arteries have been studied and described up to now: (i) physiological properties like age, gender, body height, pressure, hormonal state, genetic factors; (ii) environmental factors like nutrition (fish-, salt-, garlic consumption), smoking, performance of sports and aerobic capacity; (iii) diseases like hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, Marfan-syndrome, growth hormone deficiency. Close association between several of these factors impedes analyzing them independently from each other. Age and blood pressure were found to be the most prominent predictors of arterial stiffness in normal as well as in disease populations. Physiological and environmental factors can modulate these effects of aging, diseases generally seem to amplify them.

Thioctic acid (TA), a racemate of R-(+)- and S-(-)-enantiomers of alpha-lipoic acid, acts as a powerful lipophilic, free-radical scavenger and is used in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. This trial investigated the dose-linearity of enantiomer pharmacokinetics following the oral administration of single doses of 50 to 600 mg TA (formulation provided by ASTA (Medica)) in healthy volunteers. TA enantiomer concentrations in individual and pooled plasma samples were determined using enantioselective, high-performance liquid chromatography. TA was rapidly absorbed (tmax, 0.5 to 1 h). Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of the R-(+)-enantiomer were about 40-50% higher than those of the S-(-)-enantiomer (50 mg: 135.45 ng/ml R-(+)-TA, 67.83 ng/ml S-(-)-TA; 600 mg: 1812.32 ng/ml R-(+)-TA, 978.20 ng/ml S-(-)-TA; geometric means). The decline observed in the plasma concentration was steep (t1/2, 0.5 h). The dose-linearity and proportionality of pharmacokinetic parameters could be demonstrated on an intra-individual basis and for the group geometric means. An analysis of pooled plasma samples proved to be a suitable means for deriving reliable first-sight results prior to individual assessments.

The effects of 2 fixed antihypertensive combination drugs on blood pressure and aortic elastic properties were compared in 2 parallel groups. Twenty-six patients for 6 months received a calcium antagonist plus ACE inhibitor (verapamil SR 180 mg/trandolapril 1 mg (Vera/Tran)) and 25 patients a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist plus diuretic (metoprolol 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (Meto/HCTZ)). In addition to blood pressure (SBP, DBP), carotidofemoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed non-invasively. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) was determined from cardiac output derived by electrical impedance cardiography. Sitting DBP decreased for -14.4 mmHg following Vera/Tran compared with -9.2 mmHg following Meto/HCTZ (p = 0.02 for difference between treatments). Blood pressure was normalized (i.e. DBP < 90 mmHg) in 69% of patients with Vera/Tran and in 52% with Meto/HCTZ. PWV was lowered with Vera/Tran to a higher extent than with Meto/HCTZ (differences between group means -0.46 to -0.98 m/sec, statistically not significant). Vera/Tran induced a decrease in TPR of about 15% of baseline values, whereas Meto/HCTZ showed no influence. Treatment-related adverse events following Meto/HCTZ were bradycardia and associated symptoms; following Vera/Tran these were cough and edema in 1 case each. In the Meto/HCTZ group, there were more withdrawals/drop-outs (9/25) than in the Vera/Tran group (2/26). The somewhat more intense reduction in PWV with Vera/Tran is indicative of an increase in aortic elastic properties associated with the more potent decrease in BP. In the present study, the combination of calcium antagonist plus ACE inhibitor was found to be an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive regimen and in these respects appears to have some advantages compared with a combination of beta-blocker plus diuretic.

Aims: The pharmacodynamic properties of the angiotensin II antagonist candesartan in humans were assessed from the rightward shifts of angiotensin II dose-effect curves (Schild regression technique). The pharmacokinetic characteristics were determined by radioreceptor assay (r.r.a.) and h.p.l.c., Methods: Twelve healthy male volunteers received single oral doses of 4, 8 and 16 mg candesartan cilexetil and placebo. Plasma was obtained for h.p.l.c. and r.r.a. (receptors: rat lung; radioligand: [125I-Sar1Ile8]-angiotensin II). Before and up to 24 h post dosing angiotensin II was infused in ascending dose steps until blood pressure (systolic and/or diastolic) increased by +25 mmHg. Individual angiotensin II dose-effect curves were fitted according to an Emax model and dose ratios (DR) calculated from the antagonist induced rightward shifts., Results: Candesartan, the active metabolite of candesartan cilexetil, declined from peak concentrations at about 4 h with a t1/2 of about 6 h. A linear relation (slope 1) between h.p.l.c. and r.r.a. data revealed that there is no other active metabolite. DR at 6-9 h post dosing reached a maximum of about 30 and at 24 h still amounted to 4-7, indicating the persistence of a relevant antagonistic effect in vivo. The apparent Ki-doses (derived from Schild regression plots) indicated a high potency (1.9 mg at 24 h) and slow decline of effect. Between plasma concentrations and antagonistic effect a counterclockwise hysteresis was visible., Conclusions: A longer persistence of the antagonistic effect at the receptor site than expected by the presence in plasma indicates a slow off-rate of candesartan cilexetil from in vivo receptors. This provides an additional rationale for the observed 24 h therapeutic activity of candesartan cilexetil.

Background: Epidemiological studies have suggested that garlic may have protective effects against cardiovascular diseases. We undertook this cross-sectional observational study to test the hypothesis that regular garlic intake would delay the stiffening of the aorta relating to aging., Methods and Results: We studied healthy adults (n=101; age, 50 to 80 years) who were taking > or = 300 mg/d of standardized garlic powder for > or = 2 years and 101 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pressure-standardized elastic vascular resistance (EVR) were used to measure the elastic properties of the aorta. Blood pressures, heart rate, and plasma lipid levels were similar in the two groups. PWV (8.3+/-1.46 versus 9.8+/-2.45 m/s; P<.0001) and EVR (0.63+/-0.21 versus 0.9+/-0.44 m2 x s(-2) x mm Hg(-1); P<.0001) were lower in the garlic group than in the control group. PWV showed significant positive correlation with age (garlic group, r=.44; control group, r=.52) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (garlic group, r=.48; control group, r=.54). With any degree of increase in age or SBP, PWV increased less in the garlic group than in the control group (P<.0001). ANCOVA and multiple regression analyses demonstrated that age and SBP were the most important determinants of PWV and that the effect of garlic on PWV was independent of confounding factors., Conclusions: Chronic garlic powder intake attenuated age-related increases in aortic stiffness. These data strongly support the hypothesis that garlic intake had a protective effect on the elastic properties of the aorta related to aging in humans.

Objective: The pharmacodynamic properties of a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist (BAY 10-6734) in humans were to be quantitatively characterized from the rightward shifts of the agonist dose-response curves after administration of different doses of the antagonist., Methods: 24 healthy male volunteers received single oral doses of 20-300 mg BAY 10-6734. Before and up to 23 h post dosing (p.d.) plasma was obtained for HPLC measurement of parent compound and active metabolite BAY 10-6735. Exogenous angiotensin II was infused in increasing dose steps until blood pressure had increased by +25 mmHg. Angiotensin II dose-response curves were fitted individually using the sigmoidal Emax model. From the antagonist-induced rightward shifts, as compared to a premedication curve, dose ratios (DR) were determined and DR-1 plotted versus applied dosages and measured plasma concentrations. From these Schild regression plots the fictive doses and concentration (Ki) inducing a DR-1 = 1, i.e. a 2-fold shift in agonist dose-response curves, were derived. The "doubling (t2.0) time" of the apparent Ki doses was calculated., Results: BAY 10-6734 dose-dependently induced rightward shifts of the angiotensin II blood pressure response curves, mean maximum DR at 2 h p.d. ranged from 42 (80 mg) to 216 (300 mg), and at 23 h p.d. decreased to about 2 (80 mg) to 4 (300 mg). Pharmacodynamic (3.4-4.6 h) and pharmacokinetic half-lives (3.4-4.3 h) were nearly identical. Apparent Ki doses increased from about 1-2 mg at 2 h p.d. to about 80-100 mg at 23 h p.d., their time course revealed a doubling (t2.0) time of 3.5-3.8 h. A Ki concentration of about 10 micrograms/l was obtained for the active metabolite BAY 10-6735., Conclusions: Oral administration of BAY 10-6734 in man antagonized angiotensin II dose blood pressure response curves in a dose-dependent manner. The time kinetics of the pharmacodynamic effect, derived from the decay of DR-1 values, as well as the doubling time of the apparent Ki values well agreed with the pharmacokinetic half-life. Schild regression revealed competitive angiotensin II antagonistic properties within the dose/concentration range tested. This technique was shown to be an adequate means to evaluate pharmacodynamic potency and kinetic behavior of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist in vivo.

To determine the effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on transmitral Doppler echocardiography flow characteristics of left ventricular diastolic filling, we studied 10 healthy volunteers aged 23-31 years (mean age, 26.6 years) during intravenous infusion of isoprenaline in consecutive steps of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.75, and 1.5 micrograms/min (each for 15 min). Saline control infusion was given in the same manner in a crossover and blinded protocol. Compared with the infusion of placebo, stepwise increasing doses of isoprenaline caused a dose-related increase in early and late diastolic filling velocities and velocity-time integrals, a lengthening of the acceleration time, and a shortening of the deceleration and filling time. The chosen method proved highly sensitive, as statistically significant changes were detectable at the lowest dose of 0.1 microgram/min for all variables except velocity-time integral of late filling and deceleration time (> or = 0.2 microgram/min). The effects related to dose in a log-linear fashion except for the lengthening of the acceleration time (early ceiling), the increase of peak early filling velocity (increased steepness at higher doses), and the shortening of the filling time. Inclusion of the associated increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and the decrease in diastolic blood pressure blunted all treatment contrasts except for the increase of peak early filling velocity. In addition, the hemodynamics with respect to heart rate and loading conditions were not altered at low dosages of drug (< 0.4 microgram/min). Effects of at least the peak early filling velocity must be interpreted as an active adrenergically mediated myocardial relaxation process. These findings have potentially important clinical implications for this noninvasive, readily available, and convenient technique in clinical pharmacology, stress testing, and possibly therapeutic interventions in diastolic dysfunction in humans.

The cardiovascular responses to various inodilatory interventions were investigated noninvasively in healthy man by monitoring heart rate (HR), blood pressure (SBP/DBP, according to Korotkoff I and IV criteria), systolic time intervals (PEP, VET and QS2) and impedance cardiographic estimates of stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO). The following inodilatory interventions were evaluated and compared: the i.v. infusion of adrenaline (1 microgram/min), the i.v. infusion of isoprenaline (1 microgram/min) with and without pretreatment with 100 mg talinolol (a beta 1-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist), the p.o. administration of 1200 mg celiprolol (a beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with ancillary beta-adrenergic agonistic properties at the chosen dose level), the p.o. administration of 0.4 mg bimakalim (a K+ channel activator without direct cardiac effect) with and without pretreatment with 5 mg bisoprolol and the p.o. administration of the PDE-III inhibitors meribendan and isomazole. The extent of the inodilatory rise of HR, shortening of PEP, rise of SV and CO relative to the associated reduction of the calculated total peripheral resistance (TPR) proved a powerful tool to differentiate inodilatory properties: adrenaline, isoprenaline after beta 1-selective beta-adrenoceptor blockade and celiprolol led to similar ancillary adrenaline-like cardiovascular changes relative to the vasodilatation; bimakalim led to similar associated changes except for a relatively larger rise in HR, which could be blocked by bisoprolol; isoprenaline induced clearly larger associated changes, for which HR, VET, and QS2c were particularly sensitive; meribendan and isomazole resulted in the largest ancillary changes, characterized by a critical shortening of the ejection time VET, so that the rise of CO was almost exclusively defined by the rise of HR. These differences could be detected and differentiated sufficiently and adequately by HR, SV, CO, TPR, PEP, and VET. There seems little value in using more assumptive variables such as HR-corrected VETc and QS2c, the Weissler index and the impedance cardiographic Heather index.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril on the elastic properties of the aorta. A standard diuretic antihypertensive drug, hydrochlorothiazide, served for comparisons. Increased aortic stiffness leads to a reduction of the buffering windkessel function and is a major component in the pathophysiology of systolic hypertension, inducing an increase in left ventricular afterload and arterial pulsatile stress as well as a decrease in the subendocardial blood supply. Stiffness of arteries increases with age and blood pressure, and depends on the functional elastic structures of the aortic wall. ACE inhibitors have been shown to directly influence elastic properties of peripheral arteries. Seventeen patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (age 45-67 years) were treated for 3 months double-blind randomized with either cilazapril (C) 5 mg daily (n = 9) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg daily (n = 8). Aortic elastic properties were noninvasively assessed by measurement of pulse wave velocity along the aorta at rest and during isometric handgrip stress. Accelerated pulse wave velocity indicates elevated arterial stiffness and vice versa. A pressure standardized index of aortic cross-sectional distensibility (2 m) was calculated from arterial mean pressure and pulse wave velocity. Compared with pretreatment values, both therapies significantly reduced blood pressure and pulse wave velocity at rest (C: 9.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.7 +/- 0.7 m/sec; HcTZ: 8.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.4 m/sec; means +/- SEM p < 0.05). During isometric stress only C showed a significant decrease in pulse wave velocity (C: 11.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 9.1 +/- 0.8 m/sec; HCTZ: 9.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 9.0 +/- 0.5 m/sec; means +/- SEM p < 0.05). The index 2m at rest and during handgrip increased significantly (p < 0.05) after C but not after HCTZ. With cilazapril we obtained steeper slopes for the treatment-induced reductions in blood pressure and pulse wave velocity for both rest and handgrip stress values. Correlation of the data at rest and during stress revealed a direct relationship between blood pressure and pulse wave velocity. HCTZ linearly extended the relation observed before treatment toward lower values of blood pressure and corresponding pulse wave velocity without changing the relation per se. Cilazapril, in contrast, moved the relation between these variables and decelerated the pulse wave velocities to a greater extent than would have been expected from the corresponding blood pressure reduction (delta approximately 1 m/sec). These results in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension support the idea that ACE inhibitors, in addition to reducing blood pressure, may exert an additional hemodynamic effect in improving the elastic properties of the aorta.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was designed to differentiate the pharmacodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan from the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Effects of placebo, enalapril (10 mg), and losartan (20 and 100 mg) on local venous and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin I and II were compared in eight healthy male subjects. Treatments were administered orally approximately 4 hours before agonist infusions into a dorsal hand vein. Local changes in hand vein diameter and systemic blood pressure were monitored during the infusions. The 100 mg dose of losartan attenuated local venoconstrictor and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin I and II. In contrast, enalapril blocked only responses to angiotensin I. Both losartan and enalapril increased plasma renin concentration compared with placebo. These results are consistent with direct antagonism of angiotensin II receptors by losartan and with indirect effects of enalapril through inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme.

1. The agreement of blood pressure measurements by stethoscope auscultation (SBPa, DBPa-IV and DBPa-V), oscillometry (Dinamap; SBPo, and DBPo) and digital photoplethysmography (Finapres; SBPf, and DBPf) with the graphical analysis of the analogue microphone signals of vascular wall motion sound (SBPg and DBPg) was evaluated in eight healthy subjects in the presence of responses to the intravenous infusion of 1 microgram min-1 isoprenaline. 2. In general, there was good agreement between the SBP/DBP-measurements based on auscultatory Korotkoff-I- and IV-criteria and the reference method; the average method difference in estimating the isoprenaline responses for SBPa-SBPg was: -1.1, 95% CI: -5.4 to 3.1 mm Hg with a within-subject between-method repeatability coefficient (REP) of 11.6 mm Hg and for DBPa-IV-DBPg: 3.5, 95% CI: -0.5 to 6.5 mm Hg, REP: 11.5 mm Hg. The ausculatation of Korotkoff-V substantially overestimated the isoprenaline induced reduction of DBP: method difference DBPa-V-DBPg: -11.3, 95% CI: -17.8 to -4.7 mm Hg, REP: 31.8 mm Hg. 3. Oscillometry yielded good approximations for the SBP response to isoprenaline (average method difference SBPo-SBPg: -2.9, 95% CI: -9.0 to 3.3 mm Hg, REP: 17.6 mm Hg) but was poorly sensitive with regard to the DBP responses: method difference DBPo-DBPg: 6.5, 95% CI: -1.3 to 14.3 mm Hg, REP: 25.7 mm Hg. 4. Whilst the finger pulse pressure agreed well with regard to DBP (method difference for the DBP responses to isoprenaline: DBPf-DBPg: 1.8, 95% CI: -5.1 to 8.6 mm Hg, REP: 18.5 mm Hg) it was rather unsatisfactory with regard to SBP (method difference SBPf-SBPg: -14.1, 95% CI: -28.2 to -0.1 mm Hg, REP: 49.9 mm Hg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

An understanding of the role of the aortic elastic properties indicates their relevance at several sites of cardiovascular function. Acting as an elastic buffering chamber behind the heart (the Windkessel function), the aorta and some of the proximal large vessels store about 50% of the left ventricular stroke volume during systole. In diastole, the elastic forces of the aortic wall forward this 50% of the volume to the peripheral circulation, thus creating a nearly continuous peripheral blood flow. This systolic-diastolic interplay represents the Windkessel function, which has an influence not only on the peripheral circulation but also on the heart, resulting in a reduction of left ventricular afterload and improvement in coronary blood flow and left ventricular relaxation. The elastic resistance (or stiffness), which the aorta sets against its systolic distention, increases with aging, with an increase in blood pressure, and with pathological changes such as atherosclerosis. This increased stiffness leads to an increase in systolic blood pressure and a decrease in diastolic blood pressure at any given mean pressure, an increase in systolic blood velocity, an increase in left ventricular afterload, and a decrease in subendocardial blood supply during diastole, and must be considered a major pathophysiological factor, for example, in systolic hypertension. The elastic properties of the aortic Windkessel can be assessed in vivo in humans in several ways, most easily by measuring the pulse wave velocity along the aorta. The higher this velocity, the higher the elastic resistance, that is, the stiffness. Other methods depend on assessment of the ratio between pulse pressure and aortic volume changes (delata P/delta V), which can be assessed noninvasively by ultrasonic or tomographic methods. All assessments of vessel stiffness have to take into account the direct effect of current blood pressure, and thus judgements about influences of interventions rely on an unchanged blood pressure. Alternatively, to derive the "intrinsic" stiffness of the aortic wall one has to correct for the effect of the blood pressure present. Recently reports about pharmacologic influences on the elastic properties of the aorta have emerged in the literature.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The overall therapeutic equivalence of a fluorochlorohydrocarbon (FCH)-free glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) pump spray with a low ethanol content (TL) was investigated relative to an FCH-containing GTN spray (Nitrolingual; R), in terms of: (1) pharmacokinetic bioavailability, (2) pharmacodynamic responses as assessed by digital plethysmography (DPG), and (3) clinical perception upon application. Pharmacokinetically, the time courses of the plasma concentrations of GTN and its dinitrate metabolites, 1,2- and 1,3-GDN, subsequent to the sublingual administration of 0.8 mg GTN showed somewhat lower bioavailability of GTN and its metabolites than to the reference. Pharmacodynamically, the changes in the DPG signals after the application of 0.8 mg GTN with TL were biostatistically equivalent with R (estimated ratio TL/R for the maximum decrease of the ratio between the systolic a wave and c incisure: 0.98; 90% CI: 0.84-1.14; and for the average decrease of the c: a ratio: 0.97; 90% CI: 0.80-1.16). The time of occurrence of the maximum effect of TL was not significantly different from that of R (estimated difference TL-R: -2.25 min; 95% CI:-9.5 min to 2 min). In contrast, after the administration of an FCH-free GTN spray with a higher ethanol content (TH, active control), the effect had a slightly earlier onset (TH-R: -6 min, 95% CI:-9.5 to -2 min) and there was a higher average response (TH/R: 1.12: 90% CI: 0.95 to 1.34). However, TH was consistently judged to cause an extremely unpleasant burning sensation in the mouth and thus was perceived as distinctly different from R. In contrast, TL was well tolerated and could not be distinguished from R.

A protocol is presented for supine bicycle ergometry in healthy subjects, which aims for a target increase of heart rate (HR = 140 beats min-1) after 4 min cycling under constant load. The required load is selected from a pre-study ergometry with stepwise increasing load. Repeated testing with this protocol was shown to yield highly reproducible ergometric HR-responses. Because of their high reliability, the ergometric endpoints and increments permit a highly sensitive comparison of beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonism across dose and time within a given compound. The relationship between the changes of the ergometric rise of HR and the beta 1-adrenoceptor occupancy (estimated from radioreceptor assay data) permits to evaluate the ergometric efficiency of different beta-adrenoceptor antagonists across time and doses and to identify eventual differences that do not relate primarily to the extent of beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonism itself.