Search

Background To explore the thoughts, feelings, and experiences of patients with mesh-related complications after hernia repair. The rate of long-term mesh-related complications requiring procedural intervention after abdominal core surgery, including hernia repair, is unknown. Determining this rate is challenging due to its anticipated low chance of occuring and historically poor systematic long-term follow-up in patients’ hernia repair. The lived experience of these patients is also not well understood. Methods Purposive sampling was used to identify patients who have experienced mesh-related complications after hernia repair, and semistructured interviews were conducted. Descriptive thematic analysis was used to identify, analyze, and report common patterns across the data set related to the patient experience of mesh-related complications. Results Eight patients who had undergone a hernia repair with mesh and had at least 1 mesh-related complication after their repair requiring operation, an additional procedure, or medical treatment were included in the study and completed semistructured interviews over the phone. Five domains emerged from the interviews: indicators of mesh-related complications, knowledge of potential surgical complications, relationship/satisfcation with surgeon and/or surgical team, psychosocial impact of hernia repair and mesh-related complications, and function. Conclusion Despite the widespread use of mesh in abdominal wall operations, little is known regarding the patient experience of mesh-related complications. The themes identified in the present study provide insight into the patient experience of mesh-related complications and can inform the future development of a patient-reported outcome measure to determine the true incidence of mesh-related complications and the impact of these complications on quality of life.

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) has been shown to improve overall quality of life (QOL) by the validated 12-question Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life survey (HerQLes). However, which specific aspects of quality of life are most affected by VHR have not been formally investigated.Through retrospective analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative national database, we measured the change in each individual component of the HerQLes questionnaire from a pre-operative baseline assessment to one-year postoperatively in VHR patients.In total, 1,875 VHR patients had completed both pre- and post-operative questionnaires from 2014-2018. They were predominately Caucasian (92.3%), 57.9 ± 12.4 Y old, and evenly gender split (50.5% male, 49.5% female, P = 0.31). Most operations were performed open (80.5%) with fewer laparoscopic (7.5%) or robotic cases (12.1%). For each of the 12 individual categories, improvement in QOL from baseline to 1-Y was found to be statistically significant (P0.0001). This held true with subgroup analysis of small (2 cm), medium (2-6 cm), and large (6 cm) hernias (P0.0001), though a larger improvement was seen in 8 of 12 components in hernias6 cm (P0.001). Operative approach did not carry a significant effect except in medium hernias (2-6 cm), where an open approach saw a greater improvement in the "accomplish less at work" item (P = 0.02).VHR is associated with improvement in each of the 12 components of QOL measured in the HerQLes questionnaire, regardless of the size of their hernia. The amount of improvement, however, may be dependent on hernia size and approach.

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons provide guidelines for managing suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones. We sought to evaluate adherence to the guidelines among patients with choledocholithiasis and/or acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) and to evaluate the ability of these guidelines to predict choledocholithiasis.We prospectively identified patients undergoing same-admission cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis and/or ABP from 2016 to 2019 at 12 United States medical centers. Predictors of suspected CBD stones were very strong (CBD stone on ultrasound; bilirubin4 mg/dL), strong (CBD6 mm; bilirubin ≥1.8 to ≤4 mg/dL), or moderate (abnormal liver function tests other than bilirubin; age55 years; ABP). Patients were grouped by probability of CBD stones: high (any very strong or both strong predictors), low (no predictors), or intermediate (any other predictor combination). The management of each probability group was compared with the recommended management in the guidelines.The cohort was comprised of 844 patients. High-probability patients had 64.3% (n = 238/370) deviation from guidelines, intermediate-probability patients had 29% (n = 132/455) deviation, and low-probability patients had 78.9% (n = 15/19) deviation. Acute biliary pancreatitis increased the odds of deviation for the high- (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.8; p = 0.03) and intermediate-probability groups (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.07-2.42; p = 0.02). Age older than 55 years (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.4-3.43; p0.001) also increased the odds of deviation for the intermediate group. A CBD greater than 6 mm predicted choledocholithiasis in the high (adjusted OR (aOR), 2.16; 95% CI, 1.17-3.97; p = 0.01) and intermediate group (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.59-4.86; p0.001). Any very strong predictor (aOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.76-3.37; p0.0001) and both strong predictors predicted choledocholithiasis (aOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.35-2.96; p0.001).Almost 45% of patients with suspected CBD stones were managed discordantly from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines. We believe these guidelines warrant revision to better reflect the ability of the clinical variables at predicting choledocholithiasis.Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Purpose Ambiguity exists defining abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) and associated Current Procedural Terminology code usage in the context of ventral hernia repair (VHR), especially with recent adoption of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted AWR techniques. Current guidelines have not accounted for the spectrum of repair complexity and have relied on expert opinion. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based definition and coding algorithm for AWR based on myofascial releases performed. Methods Three vignettes and associated outcomes were evaluated in adult patients who underwent elecive VHR with mesh between 2013 and 2020 in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative including: (1) no myofascial release (NR), (2) posterior rectus sheath myofascial release (PRS), and (3) PRS with transversus abdominis release or external oblique release (PRS-TA/EO). The primary outcome measure was operative time based on the following categories (min): 0–59, 60–119, 120–179, 180–239, and 240 + ; secondary outcomes included disease severity measures and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Results 15,246 patients were included: 7287(NR), 2425(PRS), and 5534(PRS-TA/EO). Operative time increased based on myofascial releases performed: 180–239 min (p p Conclusion AWR is defined as VHR including myofascial release. Coding for AWR should reflect the actual effort used to manage these patients. We propose an evidence-based approach to AWR coding that focuses on myofascial release and is inclusive of minimally invasive techniques.

We performed a retrospective review of a national hernia database (The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) to compare rates of postoperative complications for propensity matched older adults undergoing robotic vs. open retromuscular ventral hernia repair. We found that despite longer OR times, the robotic approach resulted in much shorter lengths of stay with equivalent complication and readmission rates.To describe 30-day outcomes including post-operative complications, readmissions, and quality of life score changes for older adults undergoing elective ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement and to compare rates of these outcomes for individuals undergoing robotic versus open approaches.Over one third of patients presenting for elective ventral hernia repair are over the age of 65 and many have complex surgical histories that warrant intricate hernia repairs. Robotic ventral hernia repairs have gained increasing popularity in the US and in some studies have demonstrated decreased rates of postoperative complications, and less pain resulting in shorter hospital stays. However, the robotic approach has several downsides including prolonged operative times as well as the use of pneumoperitoneum which may be risky in older patients.We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in a national hernia specific registry (the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) and identified patients over the age of 65 undergoing either an open or robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. After propensity score matching adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hernia related factors, logistic regression was used to compare 30-day complications, readmission, and quality of life (QoL) scores as captured by the HerQLes scale for patients undergoing each approach.Of 2128 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1695 (79.7%) underwent open ventral hernia repair while 433 (20.3%) underwent robotic repair. After propensity score matching, there were 350 robotic cases and 759 open cases for analysis. Patients undergoing robotic repairs demonstrated significantly shorter length of stays (1 vs 4 days, P0.01) and had equivalent odds of both 30-day post-operative complications (OR 1.15 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.44) and readmission (OR 1.09 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.6) compared to the open approach. QoL scores were similar between groups at 30 days but were slightly better for robotic patients at 1 year (92 vs 84 P0.01).Robotic ventral hernia repair is an option for appropriately selected older patients undergoing retromuscular ventral hernia repair, demonstrating shorter hospital stays and equivalent rates of complications and readmissions in the post-operative period. However, more data is needed regarding QoL outcomes and long-term function, especially as it relates to recurrence rates, between the two approaches.

Social cohesion and neighborhood support have been linked to improved health in a variety of fields, but is not well-studied among the elderly population. This is particularly evident in surgical populations. Therefore, this study sought to assess the potential role of community distress in predicting early hernia recurrence among older adults.The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) was used to identify patients aged 65 or older undergoing elective ventral hernia repair with zip code data available. Patients were linked to the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), which is a national database that assigns a score of 0-100 to each zip code based on 7 measures of neighborhood prosperity. Quintiles were used to compare groups: prosperous (0-20), comfortable (21-40), mid-tier (41-60), at-risk (61-80), and distressed (81-100). Distressed (0-20), at-risk (21-40), mid-tier (41-60), comfortable (61-80), and prosperous (81-100). Time to recurrence for neighborhood distress quintiles was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model.In total, 9819 patients were included in the study, including 3056 (31.1%) prosperous, 2307 (23.5%) comfortable, 1795 (18.2%) mid-tier, 1390 (14.2%) at-risk, and 1271 (12.9%) distressed. Distressed communities had lower mean age and greater proportion of racial minorities (p 0.001). Open repairs were significantly more common among the distressed group (66.7%), as were all comorbidities (p 0.001). Recurrence-free survival was shorter for distressed communities compared to prosperous after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.07-1.67, p = 0.01). Mean time to recurrence was lowest for patients living in distressed communities, indicating the worst recurrence rates, while mean time to recurrence was greatest for those in prosperous zip codes (p 0.001).Older VHR patients presenting from distressed zip codes, as identified by the Distressed Communities Index, experience hernia recurrence significantly sooner as compared to patients from prosperous zip codes. This study may provide evidence of the role of neighborhood and environmental factors in caring for older patients following VHR.

Sex is emerging as an important clinical variable associated with surgical outcomes and decision making. However, its relevance in regard to baseline and treatment differences in primary and incisional ventral hernia repair remains unclear.This is a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database to identify elective umbilical, epigastric, or incisional hernia repairs. Propensity matching was performed to investigate confounder-adjusted treatment differences between men and women. Treatments of interest included surgical approach (minimally invasive or open), mesh use, mesh type, mesh position, anesthesia type, myofascial release, fascial closure, and fixation use.A total of 8,489 umbilical, 1,801 epigastric, and 16,626 incisional hernia repairs were identified. Women undergoing primary ventral hernia repair were younger (umbilical 46.4 vs 54 years, epigastric 48.7 vs 52.7 years), with lower BMI (umbilical 30.4 vs 31.5, epigastric 29.2 vs 31.1), and less likely diabetic (umbilical 9.9% vs 11.4%, epigastric 6.8% vs 8.8%). Women undergoing incisional hernia repair were also younger (mean 57.5 vs 59.1 years), but with higher BMI (33.1 vs 31.5), and more likely diabetic (21.4% vs 19.1%). Propensity-matched analysis included 3,644 umbilical, 1,232 epigastric, and 12,480 incisional hernias. Women with incisional hernia were less likely to undergo an open repair (60.2% vs 63.4%, p0.001) and have mesh used (93.8% vs 94.8%, p = 0.02). In umbilical and incisional hernia repairs, women had higher rates of intraperitoneal mesh placement and men had higher rates of preperitoneal and retro-muscular mesh placement.Small but statistically significant treatment differences in operative approach, mesh use, and mesh position exist between men and women undergoing ventral hernia repair. It remains unknown whether these treatment differences result in differing clinical outcomes.

An increasing proportion of ventral hernia patients are over age 65. These patients are frequently offered watchful waiting rather than surgical intervention due to their frail state or perioperative risk. However, many in this age group suffer from significant quality of life impacts that are not well understood. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), including adults undergoing elective ventral hernia repair from 2013 to 2019. Median differences in Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at baseline, 30-days, 6-months, and 1 year post operatively were compared in four age categories (18–40, 40–64, 65–75, 76 +) using multivariable regression. Secondary outcomes included major post-operative complications and mortality. Of 6681 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 13.5% were 18–40, 55.8% were 41–64, 25.2% were 65–75, and 5% were 76 + . Patients in the 65–75 age group and those over 76 had higher mean baseline HerQLes scores (51.7 and 60.8) compared to those in the 18–40 and 41–64 groups (45 and 43.3, p

Background: In-person interviews have traditionally been an integral part of the fellowship application process to allow faculty and applicants to interact and evaluate the intangible aspects of the matching process. COVID-19 has forced a transition away from in-person interviews to a virtual platform. This study sought to track faculty and applicant perspectives on this transition. Study Design: Prospectively collected survey data was obtained from all participants after each of 3 consecutive virtual interview days for minimally invasive surgery fellowship at a single academic institution. Results: One hundred percent (27/27 applicants and 9/9 faculty) of interview participants completed the survey. Cost (100% applicants, 77.8% faculty) was perceived as the greatest barrier to in-person interviews, and “inability to get a feel for the program/applicant” was the largest concern for virtual interviews (66.7% applicants, 88.9% faculty). After interviews, most participants strongly agreed that they were able to assess education (66.7% applicants, 77.8% faculty), clinical experience (70.4% applicants, 77.8% faculty), and research potential (70.4% applicants, 88.9% faculty) through the virtual platform. Only 44.4% of each group strongly agreed that they could assess “overall fit” equally as well. Most faculty (6/9, 66.7%), but fewer applicants (10/27, 37.0%), were willing to completely eliminate in-person interviews. Conclusion: Virtual interviews may be an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews in times of COVID-19 and beyond. Offering a virtual format may help to eliminate costs associated with in-person visits while adequately assessing the fit of a program for both applicants and faculty, though applicants still desire an in-person option.

The incidence of ventral hernia development after solid organ transplantation has been reported to be up to 30%. We aim to determine the impact of previous solid organ transplant on post-operative length of stay (LOS) and surgical site complications in elective ventral hernia repairs. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) was conducted to include all patients age 18 years or older who underwent elective incisional hernia repair. Those with and without a history of solid organ transplantation were compared. The primary outcome was in-hospital LOS. Secondary outcomes included 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) rate, 30-day surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) rate, 30-day overall post-operative complications and recurrence. The association between transplant and the LOS was tested with a negative binomial regression model adjusted for the demographic characteristics, comorbidities and hernia characteristics in the model. The population analyzed included 13,452 (98.79%) patients without a history of organ transplantation and 165 (1.21%) patients who had a history of organ transplantation. After adjusting for age, hernia width, BMI, gender, race, insurance type, ASA class, hypertension, dyspnea, OR time > 2 h, abdominal wall SSI history, recurrent hernia, operative approach the median LOS was not significantly different between patients with a history of solid organ transplant [2.8 (2.6, 2.9) days] and those without [2.6 days (2.2, 3.1)] (p = 0.5). The proportion of SSI (2.4% vs 4.04%; p = 0.42), SSOPI (4.2% vs 5.8%; p = 0.38) and recurrence (0.6% vs 0.4%, p = 0.51) was similar between both groups. Other remaining 30-day post-operative were negligible in our sample. There were no significant differences in LOS or infection rates between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplantation despite known risks of immunosuppression and chronic steroid use. Therefore, although these patients have many classic risk factors for poor outcomes, the data suggest that their history of solid organ transplantation should not preclude them from surgery.

Background This study represents a prospective, multicenter, open-label study to assess the safety, performance, and outcomes of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, Phasix™) mesh for primary ventral, primary incisional, or multiply-recurrent hernia in subjects at risk for complications. This study reports 3-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods P4HB mesh was implanted in 121 patients via retrorectus or onlay technique. Physical exam and/or quality of life surveys were completed at 1, 3, 6,12, 18, 24, and 36 months, with 5-year (60-month) follow-up ongoing. Results A total of n = 121 patients were implanted with P4HB mesh (n = 75 (62%) female) with a mean age of 54.7 ± 12.0 years and mean BMI of 32.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2 (±standard deviation). Comorbidities included: obesity (78.5%), active smokers (23.1%), COPD (28.1%), diabetes mellitus (33.1%), immunosuppression (8.3%), coronary artery disease (21.5%), chronic corticosteroid use (5.0%), hypo-albuminemia (2.5%), advanced age (5.0%), and renal insufficiency (0.8%). Hernias were repaired via retrorectus (n = 45, 37.2% with myofascial release (MR) or n = 43, 35.5% without MR), onlay (n = 8, 6.6% with MR or n = 24, 19.8% without MR), or not reported (n = 1, 0.8%). 82 patients (67.8%) completed 36-month follow-up. 17 patients (17.9% ± 0.4%) experienced hernia recurrence at 3 years, with n = 9 in the retrorectus group and n = 8 in the onlay group. SSI (n = 11) occurred in 9.3% ± 0.03% of patients. Conclusions Long-term outcomes following ventral hernia repair with P4HB mesh demonstrate low recurrence rates at 3-year (36-month) postoperative time frame with no patients developing late mesh complications or requiring mesh removal. 5-year (60-month) follow-up is ongoing., Highlights • Prospective, multicenter, open-label study of safety, performance, and outcomes. • Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh implanted in n = 121 patients via retrorectus or onlay. • 82 patients (67.8%) completed 36-month follow-up. • Hernia recurrence (n = 17, 17.9% ± 0.4%) and SSI (n = 11, 9.3% ± 0.03%) at 3 years. • No patients developed late mesh complications or required mesh removal.

Background In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sutures, staples, tacks) versus fixation-free mesh placement. Methods Adults who underwent open, elective, retromuscular ventral hernia repair of 15 cm width or less with permanent synthetic mesh placement in a clean wound were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received mechanical mesh fixation to those who received fixation-free mesh placement. Thirty-day hernia recurrence was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of 30-day hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, wound events, pain, and abdominal wall function. One- and 2-year composite recurrence and 3-year cumulative composite recurrence were also evaluated. Results A 3:1 propensity score match was performed on 299 fixation-free patients identifying 897 mechanical fixation patients, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m and mean age of 57.5 years. There was no difference in 30-day recurrence between mechanical and fixation-free approaches (0.2 percent versus 0 percent; p = 1). Median length of stay was longer for mechanical fixation (4 versus 3 days; p = 0.002). In the mechanical fixation group, pain scores were higher (worse pain, 46 versus 44; p = 0.001), and abdominal wall function scores were lower (worse function, 47 versus 60; p = 0.003), with no differences in rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, or wound events. There were no differences in long-term outcomes of 1- and 2-year composite recurrence, or 3-year cumulative composite recurrence. Conclusion For short-term technical durability, fixation-free mesh placement in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair is an acceptable alternative to mechanical fixation for hernia defects of 15 cm or less. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

Robotic–assisted retromuscular repairs reduce length of stay compared to open surgery. However, no study has evaluated the long-term impact on abdominal core quality of life. Retrospective cohort study performed using prospectively collected data from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) including adults who underwent open or robotic-assisted retromuscular, incisional hernia repair between 2013 and 2019. Differences in Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) scores at baseline and 1 year postoperatively were compared using multivariable regression models. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, wound morbidity, and hernia recurrence. 236 patients underwent open (N = 194) and robotic (N = 42) repairs. Median age was 61 years. The open group had larger hernia widths (median [IQR], 13 [9–16] vs. 7 [5–9] cm) and longer LOS (5 [4–6] vs. 1.5 [1–3] days). Median HerQLes summary scores at 1 year were similar at 88 [67, 93] points for open vs 90 [58, 94] for robotic arm. Wound morbidity rates were similar. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference in HerQLes summary score improvement 1 year after repair between techniques (3.3, CI [− 7.7, 14.3]; p = 0.52), however, patients with a comparatively larger hernia width of 7 cm had a 5.9 (CI [1.1, 10.8], p = 0.02) increase in HerQLes scores, and patients with a higher ASA class (3–5) saw an 11-point score improvement (CI [2.2, 20.0], p = 0.02) regardless of approach. Smoking, BMI above 30, or hernia recurrence had no significant impact, while COPD hindered scores (− 17.0, CI [− 32.3, − 1.7], p = 0.03). Improvement in abdominal core quality of life after repair is comparable between open and robotic retromuscular techniques. Larger hernia defects and higher ASA class patients benefitted the greatest. Robotic approaches offer shorter LOS with comparable recurrence and wound morbidity rates 1 year after surgery. The surgical approach should be personalized and guided by the surgeon’s individual and institutional expertise.

Clinical performance of hernia mesh devices is poorly understood due to a lack of relevant clinical trial and real-world data (RWD). Registries offer a means to capture longitudinal data in real-world practice. This report highlights the need for data quality, completeness, and appropriate analysis methodology for more accurate and informed interpretation of RWE of medical devices. Hernia mesh registry data were used to cross-tabulate the 30-day infection rate of patients who received one of four mesh types. Initial data review suggested lower infection rate for permanent mesh versus absorbable mesh. Additional registry RWD were factored into the analysis, providing more context in the interpretation of the results. High-quality registries can be used to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to support surveillance and other regulatory decisions.

This article seeks to be a collection of evidence and experience-based information for health care providers around the country and world looking to build or improve an abdominal core health center. Abdominal core health has proven to be a chronic condition despite advancements in surgical technique, technology, and equipment. The need for a holistic approach has been discussed and thought to be necessary to improve the care of this complex patient population.Literature relevant to the key aspects of building an abdominal core health center was thoroughly reviewed by multiple members of our abdominal core health center. This information was combined with our authors' experiences to gather relevant information for those looking to build or improve a holistic abdominal core health center.An abundance of publications have been combined with multiple members of our abdominal core health centers members experience's culminating in a wide breadth of information relevant to those looking to build or improve a holistic abdominal core health center.Evidence- and experience-based information has been collected to assist those looking to build or grow an abdominal core health center.

ObjectivesGenerating and using real-world evidence (RWE) is a pragmatic solution for evaluating health technologies. RWE is recognized by regulators, health technology assessors, clinicians, and manufacturers as a valid source of information to support their decision-making. Well-designed registries can provide RWE and become more powerful when linked with electronic health records and administrative databases in coordinated registry networks (CRNs). Our objective was to create a framework of maturity of CRNs and registries, so guiding their development and the prioritization of funding.Design, setting, and participantsWe invited 52 stakeholders from diverse backgrounds including patient advocacy groups, academic, clinical, industry and regulatory experts to participate on a Delphi survey. Of those invited, 42 participated in the survey to provide feedback on the maturity framework for CRNs and registries. An expert panel reviewed the responses to refine the framework until the target consensus of 80% was reached. Two rounds of the Delphi were distributed via Qualtrics online platform from July to August 2020 and from October to November 2020.Main outcome measuresConsensus on the maturity framework for CRNs and registries consisted of seven domains (unique device identification, efficient data collection, data quality, product life cycle approach, governance and sustainability, quality improvement, and patient-reported outcomes), each presented with five levels of maturity.ResultsOf 52 invited experts, 41 (79.9%) responded to round 1; all 41 responded to round 2; and consensus was reached for most domains. The expert panel resolved the disagreements and final consensus estimates ranged from 80.5% to 92.7% for seven domains.ConclusionsWe have developed a robust framework to assess the maturity of any CRN (or registry) to provide reliable RWE. This framework will promote harmonization of approaches to RWE generation across different disciplines and health systems. The domains and their levels may evolve over time as new solutions become available.

Background Surgeons are increasingly utilizing telemedicine to provide perioperative services to patients. Safety, satisfaction, and feasibility of these programs in general populations have been established, but it is unclear how telemedicine can be integrated into subspecialty care. We report results of a national survey related to telehealth practices among members of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). Methods Survey responses were analyzed to determine current strategies in telemedicine utilization. Surgeon preferences, perceptions of validity, and identified barriers to implementation of telemedicine were assessed. Results Forty surgeons within the ACHQC responded, with 90% of respondents reporting use of telemedicine to deliver perioperative care to patients with hernias and abdominal core health concerns. Surgeons appeared to be more comfortable managing preoperative patients with image-confirmed diagnoses of hernias. Surgeons were universally more comfortable delivering postoperative care via telemedicine. Connectivity, patient engagement, and reimbursement were identified as potential barriers to expansion of telemedicine. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported that they would increase telemedicine utilization if current regulations were maintained in the future. Conclusions This study found that hernia specialists are utilizing telemedicine at a higher rate than before the COVID-19 pandemic, with surgeons reporting interest in continued use of this modality beyond the pandemic. These findings suggest that future work in telemedicine optimization may improve the quality of care that can be delivered to patients with abdominal core health concerns. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06332-9.

Although there are many patient-reported outcome measures used for ventral hernia (VH), disease-specific instruments, such as the Hernia-related Quality-of-Life (QoL) Survey (HerQLes) and Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), have shown greater accuracy in capturing all VH-related QoL. We present a novel calibration that allows providers to convert scores between the AHQ and HerQLes, enabling better unification of QoL data.Patients with VH were prospectively identified and simultaneously administered both the AHQ and HerQLes pre- and post-operatively. To ensure the validity of the calibration, responses were excluded if patients answered instruments on different dates or if the responses were discordant on corresponding questions within each instrument. The calibration was estimated using a linear mixed effects model, including linear and quadratic scores, timing of survey relative to surgery and their interactions as fixed effects, and patients as random effects to account for multiple surveys from the same patient.In total, 109 patients were included, responding to 300 pairs of surveys (112 preoperative and 188 postoperative), of which 17 (5.6%) were excluded because of discordant responses. Conversion of the HerQLes to AHQ was most accurate when including whether the survey was completed pre- or post-operatively, with a mean squared error of 0.0091. Similarly, converting the AHQ to HerQLes was most accurate when factoring in the timing of survey administration, with a mean squared error of 0.016.We present a novel and accurate method to convert scores between the AHQ and HerQLes. Being able to unify QoL data from different PROMs supports efforts to more broadly integrate PROMs in surgery and to understand patient-defined measures of success.

The abdominal core is comprised of the diaphragm, abdominal wall, and pelvic floor, and serves several important functions for balance, movement, and strength. Injury to this area, such as hernia, can have substantial impact. The Quiet Unstable Sitting Test involves individuals seated on the rounded surface of a BOSU® balance trainer placed on top of a force plate and situated on a flat, elevated surface.An ordinal Quiet Unstable Sitting Test core stability score was calculated from center of pressure measurements, with 0 representing "normal" and 0 indicating worsening stability. Hernia-Related Quality of Life survey summary scores were assessed (higher scores indicating better quality).A developmental cohort of 32 was used to establish reliability and normative values for the Quiet Unstable Sitting Test. A control group of 32 participants (43.7 ± 16.2 yrs., BMI 29.0 ± 4.9, 66% Female) was then compared to 21 patients with hernia (56.2 ± 12.5 yrs., BMI 29.2 ± 6.3, 24% Female). Hernia patients had median composite score of -2 and median quality of life score of 66, versus median Quiet Unstable Sitting Test of -0.5 and median quality of life of 93 for controls (p ≤ 0.01). Quality of life and Quiet Unstable Sitting Test scores were not correlated (p 0.05).Hernia patients demonstrated significantly worse core stability and quality of life. These assessments were independent of one another across the entire population, indicating each measure's unique constructs of patient function. Core stability can be reliably measured in a clinical setting and may help with patient activation and rehabilitation.

Background Patient engagement is an increasingly important component of surgical decision making. Given the many factors associated with successful ventral hernia repair (VHR), we developed and validated the Outcomes Reporting App for Clinical and Patient Engagement (ORACLE) tool to help facilitate preoperative surgeon-patient discussions about VHR. Methods All patients undergoing elective, VHR with 30-day follow-up data available within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative were eligible for study inclusion. Using bootstrapping and bias-corrected calibration, predictive models were generated and validated for 5 quality measures after VHR, including postoperative wound events, estimated length of hospital stay, unplanned 30-day readmission to the hospital, and risk of hernia recurrence at 1 year postoperatively. Results A total of 10,690 patients met inclusion criteria. Based on comparison of the theoretical best to the observed calibration curves, the models for each of the 5 outcomes of interest have strong predictive strength as reflected in the Brier score for surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention, and 30-day hospital readmission, the c-index for 1-year hernia recurrence and the R2 value for the model for predicted hospital length of stay. Conclusions Using a national data set for development, ORACLE can be used to facilitate patient engagement, with the goal of tailoring interventions for VHR given each patient's unique factors. With ongoing data input into the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative and a continuous re-evaluation of these risk models, it is our intention that this tool will serve as an up-to-date resource for hernia surgeons and ventral hernia patients.

It is unclear whether a history of surgical site infection is associated with developing a new infection after subsequent operations. We aim to investigate the impact of an earlier abdominal wall surgical site infection on future 30-day infectious wound complications after open incisional hernia repair with mesh.Patients undergoing elective, clean open incisional hernia repair were identified within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative and were divided into those with and without a history of a surgical site infection. Predictors of a surgical site infection and a surgical site infection requiring a procedural intervention were investigated using logistic regression and propensity-matched analysis. A subgroup analysis was done to investigate whether an earlier methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection specifically increases odds for infectious complications.Of 3,168 identified patients, 589 had a history of a surgical site infection and experienced higher rates of postoperative surgical site infection (6.5% vs 2.9%, P.001) and surgical site infections requiring procedural intervention (5.3% vs 1.9%, P.001). After adjusting for identified confounders, a previous surgical site infection was independently associated with developing another surgical site infection (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.10, P.001) and a surgical site infection requiring procedural intervention (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.35-3.55, P = .001). Propensity-matched analysis controlling for additional confounders confirmed the association of an earlier surgical site infection with the outcomes of interest (odds ratio 2.1 and 2.8, respectively). A subgroup analysis found that an earlier methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection specifically did not incur higher rates of surgical site infection when compared with non-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pathogens.History of a surgical site infection increases the odds for new infectious complications after open incisional hernia repair in a clean wound. Investigations on perioperative interventions to ameliorate the negative impact of such association are necessary.

Objective:. To determine the effectiveness of a clinical call center in performing focused long-term patient reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up for ventral hernia patients in routine practice. Background:. Long-term follow-up remains the mainstay of assessing quality of care in hernia management. Achieving acceptable rates of long-term follow-up outside of clinical trials in the routine care of patients has been very difficult to achieve. Methods:. A prospective quality improvement intervention using a clinical call center in 1000 random patients eligible for long-term (1 year or greater) follow-up after ventral hernia repair in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative was performed. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with successfully completed PRO-based long-term follow-up. Results:. Between 2013 and 2017, the baseline long-term follow-up PRO completion rate was 2167/13,950 (15.5%). For the Focus on Follow-Up initiative, 890 patients were eligible for contact; a completion rate of 450/890 (50.6%, P < 0.001) was achieved. Conclusions:. Clinical call center-based patient contact can greatly facilitate the completion of PROs utilized for long-term follow-up in ventral hernia repair. This has important implications for quality improvement programs and postmarket device surveillance.

Background An increasing body of information suggests that preoperative physical activity level can impact postoperative outcomes. We sought to investigate this relationship in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). Methods The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry was used to identify patients undergoing a VHR between 2013 and 2019. Patient-reported preoperative exercise level was used to stratify the study population into 4 groups: none (no reported exercise), sporadic (once a month), moderate (once per week), and intense (more than once per week). Multi-variate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of preoperative exercise frequency on postoperative outcomes, including complications, hospital readmissions and length of stay. Changes in quality of life and pain from baseline to 30-days postoperatively were assessed using the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 3A Pain Scale. Results A total of 2,994 patients were included in the study, out of which 1,519 (50.7%) patients reported no preoperative exercise, 662 (22.1%) sporadic exercise, 467 (15.6%) moderate exercise, and 346 (11.6%) intense exercise. A total of 1,253 patients (19.2%) experienced a postoperative complication, out of which 249 (3.8%) had a surgical site infection. After multi-variable analysis and adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and hernia characteristics, increasing exercise frequency (versus no reported exercise) was associated with significantly lower odds of experiencing any postoperative complication (sporadic: odds ratio 0.70; P = .008; moderate: odds ratio 0.62, P = .006; intense: odds ratio 0.67, P = .04), as well as lower odds of readmission (sporadic: odds ratio 0.04; moderate: odds ratio 0.40; intense: odds ratio 0.03; P = .01). Exercise level was not associated with length of stay (sporadic: P = .36; moderate: P = .19; intense: P = .95). No significant differences were found in changes in quality of life or pain from baseline to 30-days after surgery (Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey, P = .24; National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 3A P = .14). Conclusion Patients reporting greater exercise frequency before surgery demonstrated decreased risk of complications and readmission after undergoing ventral hernia repair. Increasing preoperative exercise participation through targeted prehabilitation programs may be a viable way for patients to reduce complications associated with VHR and improve their postoperative recovery.

An increasing proportion of ventral hernia patients are over age 65. These patients are frequently offered watchful waiting rather than surgical intervention due to their frail state or perioperative risk. However, many in this age group suffer from significant quality of life impacts that are not well understood.We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), including adults undergoing elective ventral hernia repair from 2013 to 2019. Median differences in Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at baseline, 30-days, 6-months, and 1 year post operatively were compared in four age categories (18-40, 40-64, 65-75, 76 +) using multivariable regression. Secondary outcomes included major post-operative complications and mortality.Of 6681 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 13.5% were 18-40, 55.8% were 41-64, 25.2% were 65-75, and 5% were 76 + . Patients in the 65-75 age group and those over 76 had higher mean baseline HerQLes scores (51.7 and 60.8) compared to those in the 18-40 and 41-64 groups (45 and 43.3, p 0.01). Patients 65-75 had smaller increases in HerQLes scores at 30 days (6.7) compared to patients in the younger age groups (11.7 for 18-40; 8.3 for 41-64) and the oldest age group (8.3, p 0.01). However, patients in the older age groups had higher overall median 1 year HerQles Scores (66.7 for 65-75; 78.3 for 76 +) compared to patients in the 18-40 and 41-64 age groups (65 and 58.3, p 0.01). On multivariable analysis, HerQLes scores at 30 days post-surgery were decreased for patients in the 41-64 (-3.14, CE -5.89, -0.04, p = 0.03) and 65-75 (-4.53; CE -7.65, -1.41, p 0.01) groups compared to the youngest age group, while those over 76 had no effect.Older adults undergoing ventral hernia repair demonstrate equal gains in hernia-related quality of life compared to younger patients and actually report higher quality of life scores at 30 days, 6 months and, 1 year post-surgery.

Non-essential surgery had largely been suspended during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Enormous amounts of resources were utilized to shift surgical practices to a "disaster footing" with most elective surgeons assuming new roles to offset the anticipated burden from surgical and medical personnel delivering acute care. As the number of COVID-19-infected patients began to plateau in the state of Ohio, a four-phase "Responsible Return to Surgery" approach was adopted in concert with the Ohio Department of Health and the Ohio Hospital Association. This approach was adopted understanding that a simple return to the status quo prior to the COVID-19 pandemic might be harmful to patients, providers, and staff. The discrete phases undertaken at our quaternary care institution for a responsible return to non-essential surgery are outlined with the goal of ensuring timely care, minimizing community transmission, and preserving personal protective equipment. Operationalizing these phases relied upon the widespread use of telehealth, systematic COVID-19 testing, and real-time monitoring of hospital and personal protective equipment resources.

COVID-19 has created an urgent need for reorganization and surge planning among departments of surgery across the USA. Review of the COVID-19 planning process and work products in preparation for a patient surge. Organizational and process changes, workflow redesign, and communication plans are presented. The planning process included widespread collaboration among leadership from many disciplines. The department of surgery played a leading role in establishing clinical protocols, guidelines, and policies in preparation for a surge of COVID-19 patients. A multidisciplinary approach with input from clinical and nonclinical stakeholders is critical to successful crisis planning. A clear communication plan should be implemented early and input from trainees, staff, and faculty should be solicited. Major departmental and health system reorganization is required to adapt academic surgical practices to a widespread crisis. Surgical leadership, innovation, and flexibility are critical to successful planning and implementation.