Search

Jorge F Maspero,1 Claus Bachert,2,3 Fernando J Martinez,4 Nicola A Hanania,5 Benjamin Ortiz,6 Naimish Patel,7 Leda P Mannent,8 Amy Praestgaard,7 Nami Pandit-Abid,9 Shahid Siddiqui,6 Megan Hardin7 1Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2Upper Airway Research Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; 3Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 5Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 6Immunology and Allergy Medical Affairs, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 7Immunology and Inflammation, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA; 8Global Clinical Development, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France; 9Immunology and Inflammation, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USACorrespondence: Jorge F Maspero, Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Paraguay 2035, Buenos Aires, C1121ABE, Argentina, Tel +54 91141837294, Email jorge.maspero@fundacioncidea.org.arPurpose: To provide a descriptive summary of clinical efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and clinical features of obstructive lung disease in the Phase III dupilumab studies SINUS-24 and SINUS-52 (NCT02912468, NCT02898454).Patients and Methods: Patients met a “broad” definition of having clinical features of obstructive lung disease with any of 3 criteria: (i) pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.70 and smoking history; (ii) patient-reported medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); or (iii) asthma with > 10 pack-years’ smoking history. A “narrow” definition including criteria (i) or (ii) was also analyzed. CRSwNP and HRQoL measures were evaluated in all patients and lung function (FEV1; FEV1/FVC ratio) was captured and analyzed only in those patients who had a self-reported history of asthma.Results: Across both studies, 131 patients met the “broad” definition, of whom 90 also had asthma, and 115 patients met the “narrow” definition, of whom 74 had asthma. CRSwNP outcomes and HRQoL were improved with dupilumab vs placebo in both the broad and narrow subgroups. Among the 90 patients who met the broad definition and had asthma, dupilumab improved pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio at Week 16 (least squares mean differences vs placebo: 0.38 L [95% confidence interval: 0.17, 0.59; p = 0.0004] and 4.8% [1.7%, 7.9%; p = 0.0024], respectively) sustained through Week 24. Similar results were seen in the “narrow” subgroup with asthma.Conclusion: In a population of patients with CRSwNP and clinical features of obstructive lung disease, dupilumab improved CRSwNP and HRQoL outcomes, and, among those with a history of asthma, also improved lung function. These results support further analyses of dupilumab in patients with evidence of type 2 inflammation and obstructive lung disease such as COPD.Keywords: obstructive lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dupilumab, type 2 inflammation, interleukin-4, interleukin-13

Transient increases in blood eosinophil counts have been observed in dupilumab clinical trials.To assess eosinophil counts and eosinophilia-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across 11 dupilumab clinical trials, comparing adult and adolescent patients with asthma and adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), atopic dermatitis, and eosinophilic esophagitis.Eosinophil counts, rates of eosinophilia-related TEAEs or treatment-emergent eosinophilia (1,500 cells/μL), discontinuations, clinical symptoms, and efficacy in patients with asthma or CRSwNP with treatment-emergent eosinophilia are presented.Transient increases in mean eosinophil counts were observed in dupilumab-treated patients with asthma (mean range across studies at baseline: 349-370 cells/μL; week 4: 515-578 cells/μL), CRSwNP (baseline: 440-448 cells/μL; week 16: 595 cells/μL), and atopic dermatitis (baseline: 434-600 cells/μL; week 4: 410-710 cells/μL), followed by a decline starting by week 24 to baseline or lower. No increases were seen in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (baseline: 310 cells/μL; week 4: 230 cells/μL). In dupilumab-treated patients across all studies, rates of eosinophilia TEAEs were 0% to 13.6%. Clinical symptoms associated with increased eosinophils were rare (seven of 4,666 dupilumab-treated patients, including six cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and occurred only in patients with asthma or CRSwNP. Eosinophilia was not associated with reduced dupilumab efficacy.Transient increases in eosinophil counts with dupilumab treatment did not affect efficacy and were rarely of clinical consequence. It remains important for physicians to base judgment on individual patient history and baseline eosinophil counts and to be alert to hypereosinophilic symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) experience recurrent respiratory tract infections. Dupilumab targets type 2 inflammation, a common underlying pathophysiology of both conditions, with proven efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To examine investigator-reported respiratory infection adverse events and anti-infective medication use with dupilumab versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma or severe CRSwNP. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase 3 trials LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854) and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) in moderate-to-severe asthma and severe CRSwNP, respectively. RESULTS: Investigator-reported respiratory infection events occurred at a significantly lower incidence in patients treated with dupilumab versus placebo, in both asthma (22% lower; P < .0001; 95% CI 0.71-0.85) and CRSwNP (38% lower; P

BACKGROUND About one-tenth of patients with difficult-to-treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have comorbid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 receptor component, is an approved add-on treatment in severe CRSwNP. This post hoc analysis evaluated dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with CRSwNP with/without NSAID-ERD. METHODS Data were pooled from the phase 3 SINUS-24 and SINUS-52 studies in adults with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. CRSwNP, nasal airflow, lung function, and asthma control outcomes at Week 24 were evaluated, and treatment-subgroup interactions were assessed for patients with and without NSAID-ERD. RESULTS Of 724 patients, 204 (28.2%) had a diagnosis of NSAID-ERD. At Week 24, least squares mean treatment differences demonstrated significant improvements in nasal polyp score, nasal congestion (NC), Lund-Mackay computed tomography, 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Total Symptom Score (TSS), rhinosinusitis severity visual analog scale, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and improvement in smell with dupilumab versus placebo (all p

Background Frequent exacerbations are associated with greater FEV1 decline in patients with asthma. The effect of omalizumab versus placebo on lung function in patients experiencing asthma exacerbations has not been previously examined. Objective To evaluate the relationship between postbaseline (treatment phase) exacerbation status and lung function decline in children, adolescents, and adults treated with omalizumab versus placebo using data from 3 pediatric and adolescent/adult studies. Methods Changes in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) and FEV1 by treatment (omalizumab/placebo) and postbaseline exacerbation status (exacerbators/nonexacerbators) were assessed in patients aged 6 to 11 years (IA05, n = 576) and 12 to 75 years (EXTRA/INNOVATE pooled, n = 1202). Pediatric patients were examined at treatment weeks 12, 24, 28, 40, and 52, and adolescent/adult data at weeks 4, 12, 20, and 28. Results Omalizumab-treated patients experienced larger increases in ppFEV1 and FEV1 compared with placebo-treated patients in the pediatric and pooled adolescent/adult populations. The response was observed in pediatric exacerbators, with significantly larger increases in ppFEV1 and FEV1 at week 12 (mean difference [95% CI], 4.11% [0.93%-7.30%], P = .011 for ppFEV1; 80 [10-140] mL, P = .017 for FEV1) and week 28 (mean difference [95% CI], 3.65% [0.11%-7.19%], P = .043 for ppFEV1; 100 [30-170] mL, P = .007 for FEV1). In the adolescent/adult population, both exacerbators and nonexacerbators derived similar benefit with omalizumab compared with placebo. Conclusions Findings from this post hoc analysis suggest that omalizumab may confer some protection against lung function decline among patients who experienced exacerbations during treatment.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may have a role both as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, in combination with eosinophils, for assessing responsiveness to some biological therapies.We evaluated the value of baseline FeNO, adjusted for baseline blood eosinophil levels and other clinical characteristics, as an independent predictor of treatment response to dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.We performed a post-hoc analysis of LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854), a phase 3, double-blind study in patients aged ≥ 12 years with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma who received dupilumab 200/300 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. Annualized event rate (AER) of severe exacerbations and least squares mean change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEVAER increased with increasing baseline FeNO in placebo, and decreased in dupilumab groups. The relative risk of severe exacerbations was 22·7%, 58·3%, and 69·3% lower for dupilumab vs placebo for the FeNO25, 25 to50, and ≥ 50 ppb subgroups. The magnitude of FEVIncreased baseline FeNO was associated with greater clinical effects in dupilumab vs placebo, independent of eosinophil levels and other clinical characteristics.

Background Severe/difficult-to-treat disease occurs in 5% to 10% of patients with asthma, but accounts for more than 50% of related economic costs. Understanding factors associated with persistent very poorly controlled (VPC) asthma may improve outcomes. Objective To characterize persistent VPC asthma after more than 10 years of standard of care. Methods The Epidemiology and Natural history of asthma: Outcomes and treatment Regimens (TENOR) II (N = 341) was a multicenter, observational study of patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma with a single, cross-sectional visit more than 10 years after TENOR I. Persistent VPC asthma was defined as VPC asthma at TENOR I and TENOR II enrollment; without VPC asthma was defined as well- or not well-controlled asthma at either or both visits. Multivariable logistic regression assessed long-term predictors of persistent VPC asthma using TENOR I baseline variables. Results Of 327 patients, nearly half (48.0%, n = 157) had persistent VPC asthma. Comorbidities and asthma triggers were more frequent in patients with persistent VPC asthma than in patients without VPC asthma. Total geometric mean IgE was higher in patients with persistent VPC asthma (89.3 IU/mL vs 55.7 IU/mL); there was no difference in eosinophil levels. Lung function was lower in patients with persistent VPC asthma (mean % predicted pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1, 63.0% vs 82.8% and 69.6% vs 87.2%, respectively). Exacerbations in the previous year were more likely in patients with persistent VPC asthma (29.7% vs 9.0%, respectively). Predictors of persistent VPC asthma were black versus white race/ethnicity, allergic trigger count (4 vs 0), systemic corticosteroid use, and postbronchodilator FEV1 (per 10% decrease). Conclusions The burden of persistent VPC asthma is high in severe/difficult-to-treat disease; management of modifiable risk factors, maximization of lung function, and trigger avoidance may improve outcomes.

Safety and efficacy data for dupilumab beyond 1 year are lacking for patients from Japan with moderate-to-severe asthma.The TRAVERSE open-label extension (OLE) study (NCT02134028) assessed the safety and efficacy of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 96 weeks in 2282 patients who completed a previous dupilumab asthma study. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included annualized severe exacerbation rate and change from parent study baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEVTEAEs were consistent with the parent studies and the known safety profile of dupilumab. One patient permanently discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Exacerbation rates remained low and were sustained to Week 96, as were improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEVLong-term dupilumab treatment was well tolerated and efficacious in patients with non-OCS-dependent, moderate-to-severe asthma recruited from Japan. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02134028).

BACKGROUND: Type 2 inflammatory diseases often coexist in patients. Dupilumab targets type 2 inflammation and has demonstrated treatment benefits in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with an acceptable safety profile. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis across five phase 3 studies in patients with moderate to severe AD or asthma, or severe CRSwNP, evaluated time of onset and duration of the treatment response. METHODS: Patients received subcutaneous dupilumab 200/300 mg or placebo. Assessments included the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and Dermatology Life Quality Index in AD; pre-bronchodilator FEV1, daily morning peak expiratory flow, and symptom scores in asthma; and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, daily nasal congestion, and loss of smell scores in CRSwNP. RESULTS:At week 2 after the initiation of dupilumab versus placebo, 67.8% versus 36.5% of AD patients achieved a clinically meaningful benefit (Eczema Area and Severity Index: 50% or greater improvement; Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: 3 point or greater improvement; or Dermatology Life Quality Index: 4 point or greater improvement) (P < .001). Moreover, 61.6% versus 39.9% of asthma patients achieved improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 100 mL or greater and 48.8% versus 26.3% achieved 200 mL or greater improvement (both P < .001); 33.2% versus 5.6% of CRSwNP patients regained a sense of smell (P < .001). Treatment effects further improved or were sustained to the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful responses were achieved rapidly after the first dupilumab dose in AD, asthma, or CRSwNP and were sustained throughout treatment (see Video in this article's Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Background The human monoclonal antibody dupilumab blocks interleukin (IL)-4 andIL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab, on background mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS), improved outcomes in the phase III SINUS-52 study (NCT02898454) in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This posthoc analysis of SINUS-52 examined whether eosinophilic status of CRSwNP was a predictor of dupilumab efficacy. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) until week 52; dupilumab 300 mg q2w until Week 24, then 300 mg every 4 weeks until week 52; or placebo (MFNS) until week 52. Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in nasal polyps score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC), and Lund-Mackay score assessed by CT (LMK-CT) at week 24. Patients (n = 438) were stratified by eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) status according to the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Rhinosinusitis algorithm. Results Dupilumab significantly improved NPS, NC, and LMK-CT scores versus placebo at week 24 in all ECRS subgroups (p < 0.001), with improvements maintained or increased at week 52 (p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between ECRS subgroup (non-/mild or moderate/severe) and dupilumab treatment effect for all endpoints at weeks 24 and 52 (p > 0.05), except LMK-CT at week 24 (p = 0.0275). Similar results were seen for the secondary endpoints. Dupilumab was well tolerated across all ECRS subgroups. Conclusion Dupilumab produced consistent improvement in symptoms of severe CRSwNP irrespective of ECRS status. Therefore, blood eosinophil level may not be a suitable biomarker for dupilumab efficacy in CRSwNP.

Type 2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4/IL-5/IL-13 play an important role in pathogenesis of type 2 conditions, including asthma. Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4/IL-13, inhibiting signaling. In phase 2b (P2B) (NCT01854047) and phase 3 VENTURE (NCT02528214), dupilumab reduced annualized severe exacerbations rates (AER), improved forced expiratory volume in one second (FEVPost-hoc assessment of dupilumab efficacy vs placebo in P2B and VENTURE in patients stratified by allergic status.Allergic asthma was defined as total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥30 IU/mL and ≥1 perennial aeroallergen-specific IgE ≥0.35 kU/L at baseline. AER, pre-bronchodilator (BD) FEVIn patients with allergic asthma, dupilumab (P2B: pooled 200/300mg; VENTURE: 300mg) every 2 weeks vs placebo reduced AER (P2B: -60%, P.01; VENTURE: -72%, P.001), and, in P2B, increased pre-BD FEVDupilumab significantly reduced AER and improved lung function and asthma control and HRQoL in patients with or without evidence of allergic asthma.

Severe asthma affects an estimated 5–10% of the total asthma patient population [1]. Various demographic factors, such as sex, age, obesity and age of onset, have been associated with asthma disease severity [2, 3], and the efficacy of asthma treatments has previously been found to vary depending on patient demographics [4, 5]., Dupilumab treatment versus placebo improved exacerbation rate and lung function outcomes in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma and high type 2 biomarkers at baseline, regardless of baseline characteristics in the phase 3 QUEST study https://bit.ly/3yR7MlD

The Global Initiative for Asthma report recommends consideration of add-on biologics for patients with type 2 inflammation (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL, fractional exhaled nitric oxide [Feno] ≥20 parts per billion or allergic asthma) whose asthma cannot be controlled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. In QUEST (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab versus placebo was efficacious in patients with uncontrolled, moderate to severe asthma, including those with eosinophils greater than or equal to 150 cells/μL and/or Feno greater than or equal to 25 parts per billion.To assess dupilumab efficacy in patients with a type 2 phenotype in the presence or absence of allergic asthma phenotype.Patients aged 12 years or older received add-on dupilumab 200/300 mg versus matched placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Allergic asthma phenotype was defined as baseline serum total IgE greater than or equal to 30 IU/mL and 1 or more perennial aeroallergen-specific IgE level greater than or equal to 0.35 kU/L. Annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations and changes from study baseline in prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEVOf 1902 patients in QUEST, 83.3% had eosinophils and/or Feno above Global Initiative for Asthma thresholds; 56.9% had evidence for allergic asthma. Dupilumab significantly reduced the rate of severe asthma exacerbations in patients with (48.8%) and without (64.0%) evidence of allergic asthma and improved prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEVIn patients with type 2 biomarkers over Global Initiative for Asthma thresholds, dupilumab significantly reduced exacerbations and improved lung function. Efficacy was not impacted by allergic status.

Background: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for IL‑4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammatory diseases, including allergic asthma. In VENTURE (NCT02528214), add-on dupilumab 300mg q2w significantly reduced OCS dose and severe exacerbations and improved FEV1 in patients (pts) with OCS-dependent, severe asthma. Dupilumab was generally well tolerated. Aim: To assess dupilumab efficacy in VENTURE pts with and without an allergic phenotype (serum total IgE ≥30IU/mL and ≥1 perennial aeroallergen-specific IgE ≥0.35kU/L at baseline [BL]). Methods: Percent reduction in OCS dose at Week 24, annualized severe exacerbation rate (AER), and change from BL at Week 24 in pre-BD FEV1 (L) were assessed post hoc in pts with and without an allergic asthma phenotype. Results: BL characteristics were generally similar in pts with (n=86) and without (n=124) an allergic phenotype. Dupilumab reduced OCS dose by 73% and 69% vs BL and by 32% and 28% vs placebo in pts with and without an allergic phenotype, and reduced AER by 72% and 45% vs placebo, respectively. Dupilumab also improved pre-BD FEV1 in both groups (Table). Conclusions: Dupilumab significantly reduced OCS dose and AER and numerically improved lung function in patients with OCS-dependent, severe asthma regardless of allergic phenotype.

Background: The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) includes items assessing the impact of asthma on sleep in patients (pts). Dupilumab (DPL), a fully human mAb, blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in multiple diseases. In phase 3 VENTURE (NCT02528214), DPL 300mg every 2 weeks (q2w) vs placebo (PBO) reduced oral corticosteroid (OCS) maintenance dose and rate of severe asthma exacerbations and improved pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and health-related quality of life in pts with OCS-dependent, severe asthma. DPL was generally well tolerated. Aim: To assess the effect of DPL on pt-reported sleep outcomes in VENTURE. Methods: Four AQLQ items assess the impact of asthma on sleep on a scale of 1–7; scores of 6/7 indicate little/no impact of asthma. The proportion of pts with scores of 6/7 on the sleep-related items (#5, #20, #24, and #29) was evaluated at baseline (BL), Week (Wk) 12 and 24. Results: The proportion of pts reporting little/no impact of asthma on sleep-related items at BL was 17%–37%, suggesting that most pts experienced sleep impairment. A greater proportion of DPL pts vs PBO reported little/no impact of asthma on sleep at Wk 24 (P Conclusion: Pts with OCS-dependent, severe asthma had impaired sleep at BL. At Wk 24, a greater proportion of DPL pts reported waking up with asthma symptoms hardly any or none of the time vs PBO.

Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in multiple diseases. In phase 3 QUEST (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab 200 and 300 mg every 2 weeks reduced severe exacerbations, improved pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEVAdjusted annualized severe exacerbation rates over the treatment period, least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at Week 12 in pre-bronchodilator FEVDupilumab vs placebo reduced exacerbations and improved pre-bronchodilator FEVDupilumab reduced severe exacerbations and improved lung function and asthma control in subgroups of patients with type 2 asthma and high-dose ICS at baseline.NCT02414854.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a type 2 inflammatory disease treated with sinus surgery when refractory to medical intervention. However, recurrence postsurgery is common. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor for interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. We report the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP from the SINUS-24/SINUS-52 trials (NCT02912468/NCT02898454), by number of prior surgeries and time since last surgery. METHODS: Patients were randomized to placebo or dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed for patients with 0, ≥1, 1/2, or ≥3 prior surgeries, and for patients who had surgery within