Search

Abstract Background Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used as part of immunosuppressive regimens following allograft transplantation. The large pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability and narrow therapeutic range of MPA provide a potential for therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the MPA PK and PD relation in combination with belatacept (2nd generation CTLA4-Ig) or cyclosporine (CsA). Methods Seven renal allograft recipients were randomized to either belatacept (n = 4) or cyclosporine (n = 3) based immunosuppression. Samples for MPA PK and PD evaluations were collected predose and at 1, 2 and 13 weeks posttransplant. Plasma concentrations of MPA were determined by HPLC-UV. Activity of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) and the expressions of two IMPDH isoforms were measured in CD4+ cells by HPLC-UV and real-time reverse-transcription PCR, respectively. Subsets of T cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Results The MPA exposure tended to be higher among belatacept patients than in CsA patients at week 1 (P = 0.057). Further, MPA concentrations (AUC0–9 h and C0) increased with time in both groups and were higher at week 13 than at week 2 (P = 0.031, n = 6). In contrast to the postdose reductions of IMPDH activity observed early posttransplant, IMPDH activity within both treatment groups was elevated throughout the dosing interval at week 13. Transient postdose increments were also observed for IMPDH1 expression, starting at week 1. Higher MPA exposure was associated with larger elevations of IMPDH1 (r = 0.81, P = 0.023, n = 7 for MPA and IMPDH1 AUC0–9 h at week 1). The maximum IMPDH1 expression was 52 (13–177)% higher at week 13 compared to week 1 (P = 0.031, n = 6). One patient showed lower MPA exposure with time and did neither display elevations of IMPDH activity nor IMPDH1 expression. No difference was observed in T cell subsets between treatment groups. Conclusion The significant influence of MPA on IMPDH1 expression, possibly mediated through reduced guanine nucleotide levels, could explain the elevations of IMPDH activity within dosing intervals at week 13. The present regulation of IMPDH in CD4+ cells should be considered when interpreting measurements of IMPDH inhibition.

Background: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used as part of immunosuppressive regimens following allograft transplantation. The large pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability and narrow therapeutic range of MPA provide a potential for therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the MPA PK and PD relation in combination with belatacept (2nd generation CTLA4-Ig) or cyclosporine (CsA).Methods: Seven renal allograft recipients were randomized to either belatacept (n = 4) or cyclosporine (n = 3) based immunosuppression. Samples for MPA PK and PD evaluations were collected predose and at 1, 2 and 13 weeks posttransplant. Plasma concentrations of MPA were determined by HPLC-UV. Activity of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) and the expressions of two IMPDH isoforms were measured in CD4+ cells by HPLC-UV and real-time reverse-transcription PCR, respectively. Subsets of T cells were characterized by flow cytometry.Results: The MPA exposure tended to be higher among belatacept patients than in CsA patients at week 1 (P = 0.057). Further, MPA concentrations (AUC0-9 h and C0) increased with time in both groups and were higher at week 13 than at week 2 (P = 0.031, n = 6). In contrast to the postdose reductions of IMPDH activity observed early posttransplant, IMPDH activity within both treatment groups was elevated throughout the dosing interval at week 13. Transient postdose increments were also observed for IMPDH1 expression, starting at week 1. Higher MPA exposure was associated with larger elevations of IMPDH1 (r = 0.81, P = 0.023, n = 7 for MPA and IMPDH1 AUC0-9 h at week 1). The maximum IMPDH1 expression was 52 (13-177)% higher at week 13 compared to week 1 (P = 0.031, n = 6). One patient showed lower MPA exposure with time and did neither display elevations of IMPDH activity nor IMPDH1 expression. No difference was observed in T cell subsets between treatment groups.Conclusion: The significant influence of MPA on IMPDH1 expression, possibly mediated through reduced guanine nucleotide levels, could explain the elevations of IMPDH activity within dosing intervals at week 13. The present regulation of IMPDH in CD4+ cells should be considered when interpreting measurements of IMPDH inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology established the second consensus report to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice 7 years after the first version was published in 2016. This version provides information focused on new developments that have arisen in the last 7 years. For the general aspects of the pharmacology and TDM of EVR that have retained their relevance, readers can refer to the 2016 document. This edition includes new evidence from the literature, focusing on the topics updated during the last 7 years, including indirect pharmacological effects of EVR on the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 with the major mechanism of direct inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. In addition, various concepts and technical options to monitor EVR concentrations, improve analytical performance, and increase the number of options available for immunochemical analytical methods have been included. Only limited new pharmacogenetic information regarding EVR has emerged; however, pharmacometrics and model-informed precision dosing have been constructed using physiological parameters as covariates, including pharmacogenetic information. In clinical settings, EVR is combined with a decreased dose of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, instead of mycophenolic acid. The literature and recommendations for specific organ transplantations, such as that of the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, as well as for oncology and pediatrics have been updated. EVR TDM for pancreatic and islet transplantation has been added to this edition. The pharmacodynamic monitoring of EVR in organ transplantation has also been updated. These updates and additions, along with the previous version of this consensus document, will be helpful to clinicians and researchers treating patients receiving EVR., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Home-based hospital services are becoming increasingly popular, and the addition of remote outpatient appointments after kidney transplantation facilitates more practical and closer follow-up. In this context, finger-prick self-sampling is an important aspect of monitoring of immunosuppressants and biomarkers. Nevertheless, several issues must be addressed to ensure the feasibility and quality when implementing microsampling in clinical practice. We summarize our experiences and opinions in this field., Methods: This article is based on the authors' experience regarding the laboratory and clinical implementation of finger-prick self-sampling in kidney transplant recipients. The referenced literature is related to the authors' knowledge in this field., Results: We present considerations for the selection of relevant analytes, key characteristics of selected volumetric sampling tools (Mitra and Capitainer), and the associated sampling pitfalls. In addition, we address the requirements for patients performing finger-prick sampling, appropriate design of methods and workflow, critical points for validation, and aspects related to logistics and digital solutions., Conclusions: Volumetric finger-prick self-sampling is suitable for monitoring immunosuppressants and certain biomarkers that are relevant to outpatient follow-up after kidney transplantation. We believe that a carefully designed system for the entire workflow, including patient training, will be beneficial in enabling a safe experience for transplant recipients, as well as ensuring overall efficiency and adequate quality. In the future, a combination of immunosuppressants with a wide range of biomarkers has significant potential for use in at-home self-sampling after kidney transplantation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Statin-associated muscle symptoms are frequently reported and often lead to discontinuation of statin therapy with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. In vitro studies suggest that statin-mediated inhibition of the mevalonate pathway leads to muscle cell toxicity. We aimed to determine the relationship between mevalonate, LDL-cholesterol, and atorvastatin metabolites in patients with coronary heart disease and self-perceived muscle side effects. Furthermore, we assessed the correlation between mevalonate in blood and muscle and the relationship to statin intolerance due to muscle symptoms. We used blood plasma from a randomized crossover trial (n = 70) and muscle biopsies and plasma from a subgroup in a subsequent open intervention study (n = 26). Both studies tested atorvastatin 40 mg/day. Seven patients did not tolerate ≥3 statins throughout the follow-up and were classified as statin-intolerant. Mevalonate in blood plasma decreased during atorvastatin treatment (median difference -38%, range -77% to 43%, p < 0.001), whereas mevalonate in muscle tissue was not lowered (0.05%, range -47% to 145%). Mevalonate correlated poorly with LDL-cholesterol and atorvastatin metabolites (Spearman's rho -0.28 to 0.10). The statin-intolerant patients had a smaller reduction in circulating mevalonate compared with the tolerant patients; median difference -8.1 (-22 to 3.5) nmol/L versus -25 (-93 to 12) nmol/L, p = 0.028. A similar observation was made for LDL-cholesterol. Cutoffs based on these biomarkers classified >50% correctly as tolerant. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway does not appear to be the mechanism underlying statin intolerance in the present study. Further studies of mevalonate as a biomarker for statin tolerance are needed to clarify the potential., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

In solid organ transplantation (SOT), biologicals such as recombinant therapeutic proteins, monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and conjugates are increasingly used for immunosuppression, desensitization, ABO (blood group) incompatibility, antibody-mediated rejections and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. In this paper, we review the medical evidence available for biologicals used in SOT and the potential for improvement by the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and model-informed precision dosing. Biologicals are used for off-label indications within the field of SOT, building on the experience from their use on labelled indications. Dosing is currently mostly standard, and experience vs. effect and toxicity is limited. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of these large, partly also immunogenic molecules differ from those of traditional small molecules. Individualization by concentration measurements and modelling has mostly been proof-of-concept or feasibility studies that lack the power to provide evidence for improvement in clinical outcome. For some drugs such as alemtuzumab, eculizumab, rituximab, tocilizumab and belatacept, studies have demonstrated significant interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. Variability in absorption from subcutaneous administration may increase interindividual variability. There is also an economic aspect of appropriate dosing that needs to be pursued. Available assays and models to refine interpretation are in place, but trials of adequate size to document the usefulness of TDM and MIPD are scarce. Collaboration within the TDM community seems mandatory to establish studies of sufficient strength to provide evidence for the use of biologicals that are currently used off-label in SOT and furthermore to identify the settings where TDM may be beneficial., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Aims: Objective methods to determine statin adherence are requested to improve lipid management. We have recently established a method to detect reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy with cut-off values based on the sum of atorvastatin and its major metabolites in the blood. We aimed to validate this method in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, and optimize previous cut-off values., Methods and Results: The pharmacokinetic study included 60 participants treated with atorvastatin 20 mg (N = 20), 40 mg (N = 20), and 80 mg (N = 20). Atorvastatin was then stopped and blood samples collected from day zero to day four. Quantification of the parent drug and its metabolites in blood plasma was performed with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. The cut-off values for reduced adherence were validated and optimized by calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Our candidate cut-off value of dose-normalized six-component sum of atorvastatin plus metabolites <0.10 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 93% for detecting ≥2 omitted doses. An optimized cut-off <0.062 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%. An alternative simplified two-component metabolite sum with a cut-off value <0.05 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 76%. An optimized cut-off <0.02 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98%., Conclusion: This validation study confirms that our direct method discriminates reduced adherence from adherence to atorvastatin therapy with high diagnostic accuracy. The method may improve lipid management in clinical practice and serve as a useful tool in future studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)