Search

Actin filaments associated with myosin motors constitute the cytoskeletal force-generating machinery for many types of adherent cells. These actomyosin units are structurally ordered in muscle cells and, in particular, may be spatially registered across neighboring actin bundles. Such registry or stacking of myosin filaments have been recently observed in ordered actin bundles of even fibroblasts with super-resolution microscopy techniques. We introduce here a model for the dynamics of stacking arising from long-range mechanical interactions between actomyosin units through mutual contractile deformations of the intervening cytoskeletal network. The dynamics of registry involve two key processes: 1) polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments and 2) remodeling of cross-linker-rich actin adhesion zones, both of which are, in principle, mechanosensitive. By calculating the elastic forces that drive registry and their effect on actin polymerization rates, we estimate a characteristic timescale of tens of minutes for registry to be established, in agreement with experimentally observed timescales for individual kinetic processes involved in myosin stack formation, which we track and quantify. This model elucidates the role of actin turnover dynamics in myosin stacking and explains the loss of stacks seen when actin assembly or disassembly and cross-linking is experimentally disrupted in fibroblasts.

The mechanisms underlying the cellular response to extracellular matrices (ECMs) that consist ofmultiple adhesive ligands are still poorly understood. Here, we address this topic by monitoring specific cellular responses to two different extracellular adhesion molecules – the main integrin ligand fibronectin and galectin-8, a lectin that binds β- galactoside residues − as well as to mixtures of the two proteins. Comparedwith cell spreading on fibronectin, cell spreading on galectin- 8-coated substrates resulted in increased projected cell area, morepronounced extension of filopodia and, yet, the inability to form focal adhesions and stress fibers. These differences can be partially reversed by experimental manipulations of small G-proteins of the Rho family and their downstream targets, such as formins, the Arp2/3 complex and Rho kinase. We also show that the physical adhesion of cells to galectin-8 was stronger than adhesion to fibronectin. Notably, galectin-8 and fibronectin differently regulate cell spreading and focal adhesion formation, yet act synergistically to upregulate the number and length of filopodia. The physiological significance of the coherent cellular response to a molecularly complex matrix is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The small molecular inhibitor of formin FH2 domains, SMIFH2, is widely used in cell biological studies. It inhibits formin-driven actin polymerization in vitro, but not polymerization of pure actin. It is active against several types of formin from different species. Here, we found that SMIFH2 inhibits retrograde flow of myosin 2 filaments and contraction of stress fibers. We further checked the effect of SMIFH2 on non-muscle myosin 2A and skeletal muscle myosin 2 in vitro, and found that SMIFH2 inhibits activity of myosin ATPase and the ability to translocate actin filaments in the gliding actin in vitro motility assay. Inhibition of non-muscle myosin 2A in vitro required a higher concentration of SMIFH2 compared with that needed to inhibit retrograde flowand stress fiber contraction in cells.We also found that SMIFH2 inhibits several other non-muscle myosin types, including bovine myosin 10, Drosophila myosin 7a and Drosophila myosin 5, more efficiently than it inhibits formins. These off-target inhibitions demand additional careful analysis in each case when solely SMIFH2 is used to probe formin functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]