Search

Background: Technical tips for device insertion during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) have not been reported. To improve the technical success rate of device insertion without unnecessary tract dilation, the pushing force should be transmitted directly from the channel of the echoendoscope to the intrahepatic bile duct. Objectives: We developed a novel technique, termed the 'moving scope technique', the feasibility of which during EUS-HGS is described. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: The primary outcome of this study was the technical success rate of dilation device insertion without electrocautery dilation after the moving scope technique. The initial technical success rate of dilation device insertion was defined as successful insertion into the biliary tract. If dilation device insertion failed, the moving scope technique was attempted. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled in this study. The initial technical success rate for device insertion was 80.4% (115/143). The moving scope technique was therefore attempted in 28 patients. The mean angle between the intrahepatic bile duct and the guidewire was improved to 141.0° and resulted in a technical success rate of 100% (28/28). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.88, and 120° predicted successful dilation device insertion with sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 78.8%. Bile peritonitis (n = 8) and cholangitis (n = 2) were observed as adverse events, but were not severe. Conclusion: In conclusion, the moving scope technique may be helpful during EUS-HGS to achieve successful insertion of the dilation device into the biliary tract. These results should be evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim: Pancreato-biliary patients who undergo endoscopic procedures have high potential risk of delirium. Although benzodiazepine has traditionally been used to treat insomnia, this drug might increase delirium. Lemborexant may be useful for patients with insomnia, without worsening delirium, although there is no evidence for high-risk patients with pancreato-biliary disease. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lemborexant for insomnia and the frequency of delirium after endoscopic procedures under deep sedation in patients with pancreato-biliary disease. Method: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who were administered lemborexant after endoscopic procedures for pancreato-biliary disease between September 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome of this study was evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lemborexant for insomnia. Frequency of delirium was the secondary outcome. Result: In total, 64 patients who had the complication of insomnia after an endoscopic procedure were included in the study. Risk factors for delirium were advanced age (n = 36, 56.3%), dementia (n = 10, 15.6%), and regular alcohol use (n = 13, 20.3%), as well as the sedatives midazolam and pentazocine that were administered to all patients at the time of the endoscopic procedure. Successful asleep was achieved by 61/64 patients (95.3%). No fall event was observed during the night following the procedure in any patient. However, mild consciousness transformation was observed in one patient. Conclusions: In conclusion, lemborexant use may be effective and safe for use after endoscopic procedures in pancreato-biliary patients, without increasing the risk of delirium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recently, a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel has become available in Japan. However, the safety and efficacy of this novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel remain unclear for bleeding after EST. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel for bleeding after EST, and to perform a comparison to a conventional endoscopic hemostasis technique. Method: This retrospective study was carried out between January 2019 and October 2022. Patients who developed bleeding associated with EST were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups based on the hemostasis technique used: a conventional hemostasis technique (Group A) or a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel hemostasis technique (Group B). Result: A total of 62 patients (Group A, n = 36; Group B, n = 26) were included. Endoscopic hemostasis was initially obtained in 72.2% (26/32) of patients in Group A and in 88.4% (23/26) of patients in Group B, which was not significantly different (p = 0.1320). However, the procedure time was significantly shorter in Group B (mean, 9.38 min) compared with Group A (mean, 15.4 min) (p = 0.0103). There were no significant differences in the severity of bleeding between the two groups (p = 0.4530). Post-EST bleeding was observed in six patients (Group A, n = 4; Group B, n = 2). Adverse events were more frequently observed in Group A (n = 12) than in Group B (n = 1) (p = 0.0457). Conclusions: PuraStat application for EST bleeding might be safe and effective, and is comparable to the conventional endoscopic hemostasis technique, although further prospective randomized trials are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background and study aims To insert the metal stent delivery system (8.5F) during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS), several dilation steps are needed, which may be related to increased bile leakage from a fistula. There have been no definitive studies of dilation force. The aim of the present study was to evaluate dilation force during I-EUS using several dilation devices. Methods In the present study, seven dilation devices were evaluated including bougie dilators such as a straight-shaped dilator (the ES dilator, Soehendra dilator, a standard ERCP catheter) a screw-shaped dilator (Tornus ES, Soehendra stent retriever), and a 4-mm balloon catheter (REN biliary balloon catheter, Hurricane RX). The diameter of each dilator and dilation force were measured. Results Of the bougie dilators, the dilation force of the ES dilator was the highest (0.908±0.035 kg). Of the balloon catheters, the dilation force of the Hurricane RX (3.261±0.024 kg) was slightly higher than that of the REN (3.159±0.072 kg). Of the bougie dilators, although the diameter of the ES dilator was not larger than that of the Tornus ES, the dilation force was stronger. Similarly, the diameter of the Soehendra stent retriever was greater than that of the ERCP catheter or Soehendra dilator and the dilation force was lower. Conclusions Compared with bougie dilators, balloon catheters have stronger dilation force according to our experimental study. The present results should be evaluated in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest This experimental study was supported by Kaneka Medix Corporation. N.R and K.Y are employed by Medix Corporation. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

Competing Interests: Takeshi Ogura is an Editorial Board Member of the journal. This work was subjected to the journal’s standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of the editor and his research group.