Search

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent and quality of new bone 6 months after sinus lift with biphasic micro- and macroporous calcium phosphate combined with fibrin sealant (MBCP-FS) and the 1-year implant success rate in the augmented site. Material and methods MBCP-FS was applied to one sinus in 96 subjects requiring augmentation for delayed dental implant placement. In subjects who required bilateral lifts (N = 33), the MBCP-FS sinus was randomly selected; the contralateral sinus was grafted with autologous bone (mixed with Bio-Oss when harvested bone volume was insufficient. Panoramic views were taken periodically prior to and up to 18 months post-lift. Histomorphometric analysis was conducted on biopsies taken during implant placement 6 months after augmentation. Implant functionality and prosthesis success were assessed clinically 1 year after implant placement. Results In MBCP-FS sinuses, 20.6 ± 8.5% new, mainly lamellar bone was observed. Implants were placed as planned in 78/85 evaluable subjects (91.8%) 6 months after sinus lift. Graft heights remained stable 1 year after placement; 94.7% (142/150) of implants were functional. The amount and quality of new bone and implant success rates with MBCP-FS were similar to autologous bone graft (mixed with Bio-Oss in 30/31 evaluable subjects). MBCP-FS was safe and well-tolerated. Conclusions MBCP-FS is safe and effective in sinus floor elevation for dental implant placement, supporting bone regeneration and with high 1-year implant success rates similar to autologous bone mixed with Bio-Oss.

ObjectiveThe ideal hemostatic agent for treatment of suture-line bleeding at vascular anastomoses has not yet been established. This study evaluated whether the use of a fibrin sealant containing 500 IU/mL thrombin and synthetic aprotinin (FS; marketed in the United States under the name TISSEEL) is beneficial for treatment of challenging suture-line bleeding at vascular anastomoses of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts, including those further complicated by concomitant antiplatelet therapies.MethodsOver a 1-year period ending in 2010, ePTFE graft prostheses, including arterio-arterial bypasses and arteriovenous shunts, were placed in 140 patients who experienced suture-line bleeding that required treatment after completion of anastomotic suturing. Across 24 US study sites, 70 patients were randomized and treated with FS and 70 with manual compression (control). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved hemostasis at the study suture line at 4 minutes after start of application of FS or positioning of surgical gauze pads onto the study suture line.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference in the comparison of hemostasis rates at the study suture line at 4 minutes between FS (62.9%) and control (31.4%) patients (P < .0001), which was the primary end point. Similarly, hemostasis rates in the subgroup of patients on antiplatelet therapies were 64.7% (FS group) and 28.2% (control group). When analyzed by bleeding severity, the hemostatic advantage of FS over control at 4 minutes was similar (27.8% absolute improvement for moderate bleeding vs 32.8% for severe bleeding). Logistic regression analysis (accounting for gender, age, intervention type, bleeding severity, blood pressure, heparin coating of ePTFE graft, and antiplatelet therapies) found a statistically significant treatment effect in the odds ratio (OR) of meeting the primary end point between treatment groups (OR, 6.73; P < .0001), as well as statistically significant effects for intervention type (OR, 0.25; P = .0055) and bleeding severity (OR, 2.59; P = .0209). The safety profile of FS was excellent as indicated by the lack of any related serious adverse events.ConclusionsThe findings from this phase 3 study confirmed that FS is safe and its efficacy is superior to manual compression for hemostasis in patients with peripheral vascular ePTFE grafts. The data also suggest that FS promotes hemostasis independently of the patient's own coagulation system, as shown in a representative population of patients with vascular disease under single- or dual-antiplatelet therapies.

Introduction Bien que benefique, la faible thrombogenicite, porosite et elasticite des protheses en polytetrafluoroethylene expanse (ePTFE) peut exacerber le probleme des saignements sur ligne de suture au niveau des anastomoses vasculaires et conduire a augmenter la duree operatoire. L'objectif global de cette etude prospective, randomisee, controlee, avec sujets aveugles, multicentrique de phase 2 etait d'evaluer l'efficacite et la securite d'une colle de fibrine (CF) contenant 500 IU/mL de thrombine et d'aprotinine de synthese (vendue aux Etats-Unis sous le nom de TISSEEL) pour l'hemostase chez les sujets operes en chirurgie vasculaire recevant des protheses vasculaires en ePTFE. Methodes La CF etait comparee a la compression manuelle par compresses chirurgicales qui constitue le standard en matiere d'hemostase en chirurgie vasculaire. Deux delais de polymerisation de la CF (60 et 120 secondes) etaient examines afin d'evaluer l'influence sur les resultats en termes d'efficacite. Les patients qui avaient la mise en place d'une prothese en ePTFE (N = 73) et qui necessitaient un traitement supplementaire apres hemostase chirurgicale etaient randomises pour traitement par CF a clamps ouverts pendant 60 secondes (CF-60 ; N = 26), traitement par CF a clamps ouverts pendant 120 secondes (CF-120 ; N = 24) ou compression manuelle par compresses chirurgicales (controles ; N = 23). La proportion de sujets chez lesquels l'hemostase etait obtenue a 4 minutes (critere primaire de jugement) ainsi qu'a 6 et 10 minutes (criteres secondaires de jugement) au sein des trois groupes de traitement etait analysee en regression logistique, en prenant en compte le sexe, l'âge, le type d'intervention, la severite du saignement, la pression arterielle systolique, la pression arterielle diastolique, l'heparinisation des protheses ePTFE et les antiagregants plaquettaires. Resultats Il existait des differences substantielles concernant la proportion de sujets chez qui l'hemostase etait obtenue au niveau de la ligne de suture a 4 minutes entre le groupe CF-120 (62,5%) et le groupe controle (34,8% ; amelioration relative de 79,6%). L'analyse en regression logistique retrouvait un effet therapeutique statistiquement significatif a un niveau de 10% sur l'odds ratio (OR) concernant l'obtention de l'hemostase a 4 minutes entre le groupe CF-120 et le groupe controle (OR = 3,98, p = 0,0991). De plus, il etait montre que l'administration peri-operatoire d'antiagregants plaquettaires influencait significativement (OR = 3,89, p = 0,0607) le niveau d'hemostase suivant le critere primaire de jugement. Aucun effet therapeutique statistiquement significatif n'etait retrouve pour les autres facteurs. Les analyses par regression logistique concernant les criteres secondaires de jugement demontraient un effet therapeutique significatif sur l'hemostase a 6 minutes (OR = 9,92, p = 0,0225) et a 10 minutes (OR = 6,70, p = 0,0708) entre le groupe CF-120 et le groupe controle. Des effets statistiquement significatifs au cours des analyses en regression logistique etaient trouves a un niveau de 10% concernant l'OR d'obtention de l'hemostase a 6 et 10 minutes, respectivement, pour les facteurs suivants: CF-120 versus groupe controle (OR = 9,92 ; p = 0,0225 et OR = 6,70 ; p = 0,0708, respectivement), le type d'intervention (OR = 0,3 ; p = 0,0775 et OR = 0,25 ; p = 0,0402, respectivement), et l'heparinisation des protheses en ePTFE (OR = 4,83 ; p = 0,0413 et OR = 3,65 ; p = 0,911, respectivement). La CF etait sure et bien toleree, comme indique par l'absence d'evenement indesirable serieux. Conclusion Les resultats de cette etude de phase 2 soutiennent le fort profil de securite de la CF et suggerent qu'il s'agit d'un agent hemostatique efficace lors de la mise en place d'une prothese chirurgicale en ePTFE et d'un outil utile en chirurgie vasculaire peripherique avec de possibles applications.

Background The low thrombogenicity, porosity, and limited elasticity of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts, although beneficial, may exacerbate the problem of suture-line bleeding at vascular anastomoses and consequently lead to increased operating times. The overall objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled, subject-blinded, multicenter phase 2 study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fibrin sealant containing 500 IU/mL thrombin and synthetic aprotinin (FS; marketed in the United States under the name TISSEEL) for hemostasis in subjects undergoing vascular surgery and receiving prosthetic ePTFE vascular grafts. Methods FS was compared with manual compression with surgical gauze pads, a standard of care for hemostasis in vascular surgery. Two FS polymerization/setting times (60 and 120 seconds) were investigated to evaluate influence on the efficacy results. Patients undergoing ePTFE graft placement surgery ( N = 73) who experienced bleeding that required treatment after surgical hemostasis were randomized to be treated with FS with clamps opened at 60 seconds (FS-60; N = 26), with FS with clamps opened at 120 seconds (FS-120; N = 24), or with manual compression with surgical gauze pads (control; N = 23). The proportion of subjects achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes (primary endpoint) as well as at 6 and 10 minutes (secondary endpoints) in the three treatment groups was analyzed using logistic regression analysis, taking into account gender, age, type of intervention, severity of bleeding, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heparin coating of the ePTFE graft, and platelet inhibitors. Results There were substantial differences in the proportion of subjects who achieved hemostasis at the study suture line at 4 minutes from treatment application between FS-120 (62.5%) and control (34.8%) groups (a 79.6% relative improvement). Logistic regression analyses found a statistically significant treatment effect at the 10% level in the odds ratio (OR) of achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes between the FS-120 and control groups (OR = 3.98, p = 0.0991). Furthermore, it has been shown that the perioperative administration of platelet inhibitors significantly influences (OR = 3.89, p = 0.0607) hemostasis rates at the primary endpoint. No statistically significant treatment effects were found for the other factors. Logistic regression analyses performed on the secondary endpoints demonstrated a significant treatment effect of achieving hemostasis at 6 minutes (OR = 9.92, p = 0.0225) and at 10 minutes (OR = 6.70, p = 0.0708) between the FS-120 and control groups. Statistically significant effects in the logistic regression analyses were found at the 10% level in the OR of achieving hemostasis at 6 and 10 minutes, respectively, for the following factors: FS-120 versus control group (OR = 9.92; p = 0.0225 and OR = 6.70; p = 0.0708, respectively), type of intervention (OR = 0.3; p = 0.0775 and OR = 0.25; p = 0.0402, respectively), and heparin coating of the ePTFE prosthesis (OR = 4.83; p = 0.0413 and OR = 3.65; p = 0.0911, respectively). FS was safe and well-tolerated, as indicated by the lack of any related serious adverse events. Conclusion The findings from this phase 2 study support the strong safety profile of FS and suggest that it is an efficacious hemostatic agent in ePTFE graft placement surgery, as well as a useful tool in peripheral vascular surgery applications.

The objective of this phase 3, multicentered, prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, clinical study was to compare skin graft adherence utilizing a fibrin sealant containing 4 IU/ml thrombin (FS 4IU VH S/D [FS 4IU VH S/D will be marketed under the trade name ARTISS upon licensure in the United States]) to graft adherence utilizing staples in burn patients requiring wound excision and skin grafting. FS 4IU VH S/D was compared with staples in 138 patients. Patients had burn wounds measuring < or =40% of total body surface area with two comparable test sites measuring between 1 and 4% total body surface area each. Wound closure at day 28 was assessed using test site planimetry and review of day 28 photographs by three independent blinded evaluators (primary endpoint analysis). Secondary efficacy measures included hematoma/seroma on day 1, engraftment on day 5, and wound closure on day 14. Investigator and patient-reported outcomes were also assessed. The proportion of test sites with complete wound closure at day 28 was 70.3% in FS 4IU VH S/D treated sites and 65.8% in stapled sites, as assessed by planimetry. Blinded review of day 28 photographs confirmed that the rate of complete wound closure was similar between the two treatments, although the overall assessed rates of closure were lower than those determined by planimetry: FS 4IU VH S/D (43.3%) and staples (37.0%). The lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval of the difference between FS 4IU VH S/D and staples was -0.029, which is above the predefined noninferiority margin of -0.1. Therefore, FS 4IU VH S/D is at least as efficacious as staples at the 97.5% one-sided level for complete wound closure by day 28. Hematoma/seroma on day 1 occurred at significantly (P < .0001) fewer FS 4IU VH S/D-treated sites (29.7% [95% CI 22.2-38.1%]) compared with stapled sites (62.3% [95% CI 53.7-70.4%]). Engraftment on day 5 was deemed to be 100% in 62.3% (95% CI 53.7-70.4%) of the FS 4IU VH S/D-treated sites and 55.1% (95% CI 46.4-63.5%) of the stapled sites (P = .0890). Complete wound closure by day 14 occurred in 48.8% (95% CI 39.9-57.8%) of the FS 4IU VH S/D treated sites and 42.6% (95% CI 34.0-51.6%) of the stapled sites (P = .2299). FS 4IU VH S/D scored significantly better than staples for all investigator-assessed outcomes, namely quality of graft adherence (P < .0001), preference for method of fixation (P < .0001), satisfaction with graft fixation (P < .0001), and overall quality of healing (P < .0001). Likewise, FS 4IU VH S/D scored significantly better than staples for all patient-assessed outcomes, namely anxiety about pain (P < .0001) and treatment preference (P

This randomized, controlled, single-blinded multicenter study evaluated the efficacy of latest-generation fibrin sealant containing synthetic aprotinin as fibrinolysis inhibitor as supportive treatment for hemostasis after elective partial hepatectomy. Adult subjects undergoing resection of at least one liver segment were assigned to treatment with fibrin sealant or manual compression with a surgical gauze swab if persistent oozing necessitated additional hemostatic measures after primary control of arterial and venous bleeding. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with intraoperative hemostasis at 4 min after start of randomized treatment application. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included intraoperative hemostasis at 6, 8, and 10 min, intra- and postoperative rebleedings, transfusion requirements, and drainage volume. Seventy subjects were randomized. Hemostasis at 4 min was achieved in 29/35 (82.9 %) fibrin sealant subjects compared with 13/35 (37.1 %) control subjects (p