Search

Background: Most published reports analysing the differences in causation of stillbirth between different ethnic groups focus on stillbirth risk factors, with a paucity of data comparing actual causes of stillbirth. Aims: To determine whether causes of stillbirth differ between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian ethnic groups in an Australian context. Materials and Methods: Data from all stillbirths occurring at 20 or more completed weeks of gestation between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 at a secondary level, outer metropolitan hospital, were analysed in this retrospective case series. Causes of stillbirth as determined by perinatal autopsy and placental histopathology were categorised using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification and compared between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian groups. Results: Ninety‐two stillbirths (0.7% of all births) were identified during the study period. A greater proportion of non‐Caucasian women had small for gestation age placentas compared to Caucasian women (n = 22/43 (51%) vs n = 12/49 (24%); P = 0.025). A greater proportion of stillbirths were caused by hypoxic peripartum death in non‐Caucasian than in Caucasian women (n = 4/43 (9%) vs n = 0/49 (0%); P = 0.044), and a greater prevalence of placental dysfunction was seen in the non‐Caucasian cohort compared to Caucasian women (n = 14/43 (33%) vs n = 8/49 (16%); P = 0.057). Conclusions: The differences observed in causes of stillbirth between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian women are hypothesis generating and warrant further larger‐scale, multi‐centred studies using standardised definitions and classification systems to determine whether these differences persist in a more representative sample. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Inequities in stillbirth rate according to ethnicity persist in high-income nations. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether causes of stillbirth differ by ethnicity in high-income nations. Methods: The following databases were searched since their inception to 1 February 2021: Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Global Health. Cohort, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies were included. Causes of stillbirth were aligned to the International Classification of Disease 10 for Perinatal Mortality (ICD10-PM) and pooled estimates were derived by meta-analysis. Results: Fifteen reports from three countries (72 555 stillbirths) were included. Seven ethnic groups -" Caucasian" (n = 11 studies), "African" (n = 11 studies), "Hispanic" (n = 7 studies), "Indigenous Australian" (n = 4 studies), "Asian" (n = 2 studies), "South Asian" (n = 2 studies), and "American Indian" (n = 1 study) -were identified. There was an overall paucity of recent, high-quality data for many ethnicities. For those with the greatest amount of data -Caucasian, African, and Hispanic -no major differences in the causes of stillbirth were identified. Conclusion: There is a paucity of high-quality information on causes of stillbirth for many ethnicities. Improving investigation and standardizing classification of stillbirths is needed to assess whether causes of stillbirth differ across more diverse ethnic groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]