Search

Objective: To investigate the relative frequency of the genetic causes of the Schubert-Bornschein type of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) and to determine the genotype-phenotype correlations in CSNB1 and CSNB2., Design: Clinic-based, longitudinal, multicenter study., Participants: A total of 39 patients with CSNB1 from 29 families and 62 patients with CSNB2 from 43 families., Methods: Patients underwent full ophthalmologic and electrophysiologic examinations. On the basis of standard electroretinograms (ERGs), patients were diagnosed with CSNB1 or CSNB2. Molecular analysis was performed by direct Sanger sequencing of the entire coding regions in NYX, TRPM1, GRM6, and GPR179 in patients with CSNB1 and CACNA1F and CABP4 in patients with CSNB2., Main Outcome Measures: Data included genetic cause of CSNB, refractive error, visual acuity, nystagmus, strabismus, night blindness, photophobia, color vision, dark adaptation (DA) curve, and standard ERGs., Results: A diagnosis of CSNB1 or CSNB2 was based on standard ERGs. The photopic ERG was the most specific criterion to distinguish between CSNB1 and CSNB2 because it showed a "square-wave" appearance in CSNB1 and a decreased b-wave in CSNB2. Mutations causing CSNB1 were found in NYX (20 patients, 13 families), TRPM1 (10 patients, 9 families), GRM6 (4 patients, 3 families), and GPR179 (2 patients, 1 family). Congenital stationary night blindness 2 was primarily caused by mutations in CACNA1F (55 patients, 37 families). Only 3 patients had causative mutations in CABP4 (2 families). Patients with CSNB1 mainly had rod-related problems, and patients with CSNB2 had rod- and cone-related problems. The visual acuity on average was better in CSNB1 (0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) than in CSNB2 (0.52 logMAR). All patients with CSNB1 and only 54% of the patients with CSNB2 reported night blindness. The dark-adapted threshold was on average more elevated in CSNB1 (3.0 log) than in CSNB2 (1.8 log). The 3 patients with CABP4 had a relative low visual acuity, were hyperopic, had severe nonspecific color vision defects, and had only 1.0 log elevated DA threshold., Conclusions: Congenital stationary night blindness 1, despite different causative mutations, shows 1 unique CSNB1 phenotype. Congenital stationary night blindness 2 caused by mutations in CABP4 merely shows cone-related problems and therefore appears to be distinct from CSNB2 caused by mutations in CACNA1F., Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) is a retinal disorder caused by a signal transmission defect between photoreceptors and bipolar cells. CSNB can be subdivided in CSNB2 (rod signal transmission reduced) and CSNB1 (rod signal transmission absent). The present study is the first in which night vision problems are assessed in CSNB patients in a systematic way, with the purpose of improving rehabilitation for these patients. We assessed the night vision problems of 13 CSNB2 patients and 9 CSNB1 patients by means of a questionnaire on low luminance situations. We furthermore investigated their dark adapted visual functions by the Goldmann Weekers dark adaptation curve, a dark adapted static visual field, and a two-dimensional version of the "Light Lab". In the latter test, a digital image of a living room with objects was projected on a screen. While increasing the luminance of the image, we asked the patients to report on detection and recognition of objects. The questionnaire showed that the CSNB2 patients hardly experienced any night vision problems, while all CSNB1 patients experienced some problems although they generally did not describe them as severe. The three scotopic tests showed minimally to moderately decreased dark adapted visual functions in the CSNB2 patients, with differences between patients. In contrast, the dark adapted visual functions of the CSNB1 patients were more severely affected, but showed almost no differences between patients. The results from the "2D Light Lab" showed that all CSNB1 patients were blind at low intensities (equal to starlight), but quickly regained vision at higher intensities (full moonlight). Just above their dark adapted thresholds both CSNB1 and CSNB2 patients had normal visual fields. From the results we conclude that night vision problems in CSNB, in contrast to what the name suggests, are not conspicuous and generally not disabling.

Purpose: To determine normal values of the crowding ratio (CR) in children., Methods: Of 62 normally sighted primary school children aged 4-12 years old the CR was determined both for distance and near vision. The examinations were performed using commonly available test charts based on the LEA symbols., Results: At near, the CR was significantly better than at distance and for all ages <2.0. The upper limit of the CR at distance was <2.0 from age six., Conclusion: With commonly available tests the CR can easily be determined in school age children. For children >6 years of age, a CR > 2.0 (i.e. at least 3 lines difference between the result of a single optotype acuity test and a line acuity test) is suspicious and warrants further investigation. It may, for example, be a sign of cerebral visual impairment (CVI).

The amplitude versus flash strength curve of 15 Hz electroretinograms (ERGs) shows two minima. The minima are caused by interactions between the primary and the secondary rod pathways (first minimum), and the secondary rod pathway and the cone-driven pathway (second minimum). Furthermore, cone pathway contributions cause higher-order harmonics to occur in the responses. We measured 15 Hz ERGs in 20 healthy subjects to determine normal ranges and in patients to verify our hypotheses on the contributions of the different pathways and to investigate the clinical application. We analyzed the amplitudes and phases of the 15, 30, and 45 Hz components in the ERGs. The overall shape of the 15 Hz amplitude curves was similar in all normal subjects and showed two minima. The 30 and 45 Hz amplitude curves increased for stimuli of high flash strengths indicating cone pathway contributions. The 15 Hz amplitude curve of the responses of an achromat was similar to that of the normal subjects for low flash strengths and showed a minimum, indicating normal primary and secondary rod pathway function. There was no second minimum, and there were no higher-order harmonics, consistent with absent cone pathway function. The 15 Hz ERGs in CSNB1 and CSNB2 patients were similar and of low amplitude for flash strengths just above where the first minimum normally occurs. We could determine that in the CSNB1 patients, the responses originate from the cone pathway, while in the CSNB2 patients, the responses originate from the secondary rod pathway.

The minimum in the amplitude versus flash strength curve of dark-adapted 15 Hz electroretinograms (ERGs) has been attributed to interactions between the primary and secondary rod pathways. The 15 Hz ERGs can be used to examine the two rod pathways in patients. However, previous studies suggested that the cone-driven pathway also contributes to the 15 Hz ERGs for flash strengths just above that of the minimum. We investigated cone pathway contributions to improve upon the interpretation of (abnormal) 15 Hz ERGs measured in patients. We recorded 15 Hz ERGs in five healthy volunteers, using a range of flash strengths that we extended to high values. The stimuli were varied in both colour (blue, green, amber, and red) and flash duration (short flash and square wave) in order to stimulate rods and cones in various ways. The differences in the responses to the four colours could be fully explained by the spectral sensitivity of rods for flash strengths up to approximately 12.5 log quanta·deg(-2). At higher flash strengths, higher-order harmonics appeared in the responses which could be attributed to cones being more sensitive than rods to higher frequencies. Furthermore, the amplitude curves of the blue and green responses showed a second minimum suggesting rod to cone interactions. We present a descriptive model of the contributions of the rod and cone pathways. In clinical application, we would advise using the short flash flicker instead of the square wave flicker, as the responses are of larger amplitude, and cone pathway contributions can be recognized from large higher-order harmonics.

Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of retinal disorders characterized by nonprogressive impaired night vision and variable decreased visual acuity. We report here that six out of eight female probands with autosomal-recessive complete CSNB (cCSNB) had mutations in TRPM1, a retinal transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channel gene. These data suggest that TRMP1 mutations are a major cause of autosomal-recessive CSNB in individuals of European ancestry. We localized TRPM1 in human retina to the ON bipolar cell dendrites in the outer plexifom layer. Our results suggest that in humans, TRPM1 is the channel gated by the mGluR6 (GRM6) signaling cascade, which results in the light-evoked response of ON bipolar cells. Finally, we showed that detailed electroretinography is an effective way to discriminate among patients with mutations in either TRPM1 or GRM6, another autosomal-recessive cCSNB disease gene. These results add to the growing importance of the diverse group of TRP channels in human disease and also provide new insights into retinal circuitry.

Introduction: Off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) provokes motion sickness. The visual motion equivalent to OVAR in simulators is also nauseogenic. Our experiment compared the nauseogenicity of OVAR vs. visual motion., Methods: There were 12 subjects who undertook the following conditions: A) OVAR in darkness at 0.2 Hz, 18 degrees tilt; B) same OVAR with eyes open in the light; and C) stationary, seated upright, watching a video of the visual motion experienced in B. The conditions were counterbalanced and performed at the same time of day with a minimum 5-d separation between conditions. Stimulation was stopped at moderate nausea with a 20-min maximum cut-off. Motion sickness susceptibility was rated on a standardized questionnaire (MSSQ)., Results: Time (mean +/- SD minutes) to moderate nausea was significantly shorter for real OVAR conditions (A: 7.1 +/- 5.5; B: 7.7 +/- 6.7) vs. video (C: 15.7 +/- 6.4). Subjects with relatively low susceptibilities to motion sickness developed nausea more slowly with vision (B-A time difference correlated with MSSQ scores r = -0.7, P < 0.05). Headache was more prominent with visual field motion (C)., Conclusions: OVAR was twice as nauseogenic as visual motion. Headache during visual motion suggests mechanisms in common with migraine. We hypothesize that subjects who fared better in the light used visual cues to resolve sensory conflict, whereas subjects who were equally susceptible in light and dark made poor use of visual cues; perhaps a form of 'field dependency'. This may explain why some people prefer 'a view of the road ahead' to help against motion sickness whereas others shut their eyes.