Search

International audience; Purpose: To describe the sociodemographic, medical and management characteristics of patients using intravitreal (IVT) anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) in France. Methods: An observational study was conducted in patients treated with IVT ranibizumab or aflibercept, aged 18 years or older using the French National Health Insurance Databases covering 99% of the French population. Patients currently treated in 2018 were included in a cross-sectional approach to describe treatment history over the previous 6 years. Patients newly treated between 2014 and 2018 were included in a longitudinal approach to describe treatment management during up to 6 years of follow-up. Sociodemographic characteristics and medical history were described in both populations. The analyses were performed at the patient level, as no distinction between the eyes could be made. Results: A total of 224 775 current users of IVT anti-VEGF in 2018 (mean age 78.1 ± 11.3 years, 60% female) and 330 969 new users between 2014 and 2018 (mean age 75.9 ± 12.0 years, 59% female) were included. In both populations cardiovascular comorbidities or risk factors were frequent and the main treatment indications were age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema. Among current users of IVT anti-VEGF in 2018, the mean number of years receiving a treatment was 2.9 ± 2.0 years, with a mean of 13.7 ± 11.8 dispensations. In the longitudinal approach, a 26% increase in IVT anti-VEGF initiation was observed between 2014 and 2018. For new users, the mean number of years receiving a treatment was 1.6 ± 1.6 and 67% had at least three dispensations within the first three months. A treatment interruption was observed for 83% of new users and occurred on average of 6.1 ± 8.1 months after initiation. The mean number of dispensations was 4.8 ± 2.8 in the first year and 2.2 ± 2.9 in the second year. The mean number of eye monitoring examinations was 6.5 ± 4.7 in the first year and 4.6 ± 4.4 in the second year. Conclusion: This study described the real-world conditions of IVT anti-VEGF dispensing at the entire French population scale. Less frequent dispensations and surveillance examinations were observed than in monthly schemes applied in registration trials for IVT anti-VEGF. These results may indicate a lack of systematic monitoring associated with fewer injections and/or clinicians’ preference for more flexible and personalized injection schemes than those originally recommended.

This cohort study uses data from the French National Health Data System to assess the decline in the use of intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factors before, during, and after pandemic-associated lockdown periods.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Hepatotoxicity may be a concern when prescribing antidepressants. Nevertheless, this risk remains poorly understood for serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs: venlafaxine, milnacipran, duloxetine) and 'other antidepressants' (mianserin, mirtazapine, tianeptine and agomelatine), particularly in comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, escitalopram), which are by far the most commonly prescribed antidepressants.OBJECTIVE: We quantified the risk of serious liver injury associated with new use of SNRIs and 'other antidepressants' compared with SSRIs in real-life practice.METHODS: Based on the French national health insurance database, this cohort study included 4,966,825 individuals aged 25 years and older with a first reimbursement of SSRIs, SNRIs or 'other antidepressants' between January 2010 and June 2015. We compared the risk of serious liver injury within the 6 months following antidepressant initiation according to antidepressant class, with SSRIs as the reference, using an inverse probability-of-treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for demographic characteristics and risk factors of liver injury. RESULTS: We identified 382 serious liver injuries overall (none for milnacipran initiators). Age and gender standardized incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were 19.2 for SSRIs, 22.2 for venlafaxine, 12.6 for duloxetine, 21.5 for mianserin, 32.8 for mirtazapine, 31.6 for tianeptine and 24.6 for agomelatine initiators. Initiation of antidepressants of interest versus SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of serious liver injury [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval): venlafaxine 1.17 (0.83-1.64), duloxetine 0.54 (0.28-1.02), mianserin 0.90 (0.58-1.41), mirtazapine 1.17 (0.67-2.02), tianeptine 1.35 (0.82-2.23) and agomelatine 1.07 (0.51-2.23)]. This finding was confirmed by the results of an additional study using a case-time-control design.CONCLUSION: These results do not provide evidence of an increased risk of serious liver injury following initiation of SNRIs or 'other antidepressants' compared with SSRIs in real-life practice. This could reflect an inherent lack of difference in risk between the drug classes, or the fact that individuals with higher susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury are not prescribed drugs considered to be more hepatotoxic.

This work deals with the risk of dementia in elderly individuals who have used benzodiazepines. These drugs deserve particular attention because (i) their use appears to be too systematic and most often chronic despite good practice guidelines recommending short durations of use (ii) their deleterious effects on cognition remain underevaluated for the long-­‐term. Most of the studies conducted concluded that there was an increased risk of dementia among benzodiazepine users. In fact, a protopathic bias could, at least in part, have explained these results. Indeed, the prescription of benzodiazepines could have been motivated by the prodromes often observed several years before the clinical diagnosis of a dementia. With the aim of better controlling for this bias, the BENZODEM project used the resources of the PAQUID cohort (3777 subjects ≥65 years randomly sampled from electoral lists in South-­‐West France, with a 20-­‐ year follow-­‐up). This project combined two cohort studies and one case-­‐control. These studies concluded in a risk of dementia increased by 46 to 62% in benzodiazepine users and delayed by 5 to 15 years after treatment initiation. The second part of the programme (BENZODEM2) consisted of a case-­‐control study conducted in a large sample of subjects >65 years registered in the Quebec Health care database (Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec, RAMQ). It was thus possible(1)to validate the previous results by using a different population (the risk was found to be increased by 30 to 80% depending on the patterns of use regarding dose, duration and type of molecule), (2) to identify the patterns of use which appeared to be at risk; excess risk was only apparent for uses of more than three months with a marked dose-­‐effect relationship, and was higher for molecules with a long elimination half-­‐life. Complementary explorations using the PAQUID cohort indicated that the excess risk in exposed was not explained by a differential mortality rate between the groups compared. Other studies suggested that the link found remained independently of the prescription of other psychotropics. Another analysis in the PAQUID cohort showed that, in the absence of dementia, no difference was observed between benzodiazepine users and non-­‐users with regards to the evolution of scores evaluating cognitive functions. These results led to several assumptions about the putative mechanism explaining the relationship found between benzodiazepine use and dementia: (1) benzodiazepines could be early markers of symptoms such as anxiety, depression or insomnia, which are potential prodromes or risk factors for this disease, (2) these drugs could also reduce the ability to use cognitive reserve in order to cope with early lesions of the disease during the preclinical stage, (3) the association found could also result from these two mechanisms., Ce travail porte sur l’étude du risque de démence chez les personnes âgées ayant consommé des benzodiazépines. Ces médicaments méritent une attention particulière du fait de (i) leur utilisation trop systématique et le plus souvent chronique contrairement aux recommandations préconisant des durées d’utilisation courtes (ii) leurs effets délétères sur la cognition demeurant mal évalués à long terme. La plupart des études conduites sur ce sujet ont conclu à une augmentation du risque de démence chez les sujets ayant utilisé des benzodiazépines. Un biais protopathique pouvait cependant, en partie du moins, avoir expliqué ces résultats : la prescription de benzodiazépines pouvait avoir été motivée par des prodromes souvent observés au cours des années précédant le diagnostic de la maladie. Afin de mieux prendre en considération ce biais, le projet BENZODEM a utilisé les ressources de la cohorte PAQUID (3777 sujets ≥ 65 ans tirés au sort sur les listes électorales de Dordogne et Gironde bénéficiant d’un suivi de plus de 20 ans). Ce projet, combinant deux études de cohorte et une étude cas-­‐témoins, a conclu à un risque de démence augmenté de 46 à 62% chez les utilisateurs de benzodiazépines et retardé de 5 à 15 ans par rapport à l’initiation du traitement. La seconde partie du programme (BENZODEM2) a consisté en une étude cas-­‐témoins conduite sur un large échantillon de sujets de plus de 65 ans enregistrés sur la base de données de la Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Ce programme a permis (1) de valider les précédents résultats (risque augmenté de 30 à 80% en fonction de la dose, la durée du traitement et la nature des molécules) (2) d’identifier les profils de consommation associés à un excès de risque : consommateurs de plus de 3 mois avec une relation dose-­‐effet marquée et molécules à longue demi-­‐ vie d’élimination. Des explorations complémentaires ont permis de conclure que cet excès de risque n’était pas expliqué par une mortalité différentielle entre groupes comparés ni par la prescription d’autres médicaments psychotropes. Une autre étude menée sur PAQUID montrait une absence de différence entre consommateurs et non consommateurs de benzodiazépines vis-­‐à-­‐vis de l’évolution des scores mesurant les fonctions cognitives. Ces résultats ont permis d’émettre des hypothèses concernant le mécanisme de l’association entre utilisation de benzodiazépines et démence: (1) les benzodiazépines pourraient constituer des marqueurs précoces de la maladie ; (2) les benzodiazépines pourraient aussi diminuer les capacités de recours à la réserve cognitive en réponses aux lésions précoces de la maladie au stade préclinique ; (3) il est aussi possible que ces deux explications soient combinées.

This work deals with the risk of dementia in elderly individuals who have used benzodiazepines. These drugs deserve particular attention because (i) their use appears to be too systematic and most often chronic despite good practice guidelines recommending short durations of use (ii) their deleterious effects on cognition remain underevaluated for the long-­‐term. Most of the studies conducted concluded that there was an increased risk of dementia among benzodiazepine users. In fact, a protopathic bias could, at least in part, have explained these results. Indeed, the prescription of benzodiazepines could have been motivated by the prodromes often observed several years before the clinical diagnosis of a dementia. With the aim of better controlling for this bias, the BENZODEM project used the resources of the PAQUID cohort (3777 subjects ≥65 years randomly sampled from electoral lists in South-­‐West France, with a 20-­‐ year follow-­‐up). This project combined two cohort studies and one case-­‐control. These studies concluded in a risk of dementia increased by 46 to 62% in benzodiazepine users and delayed by 5 to 15 years after treatment initiation. The second part of the programme (BENZODEM2) consisted of a case-­‐control study conducted in a large sample of subjects >65 years registered in the Quebec Health care database (Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec, RAMQ). It was thus possible(1)to validate the previous results by using a different population (the risk was found to be increased by 30 to 80% depending on the patterns of use regarding dose, duration and type of molecule), (2) to identify the patterns of use which appeared to be at risk; excess risk was only apparent for uses of more than three months with a marked dose-­‐effect relationship, and was higher for molecules with a long elimination half-­‐life. Complementary explorations using the PAQUID cohort indicated that the excess risk in exposed was not explained by a differential mortality rate between the groups compared. Other studies suggested that the link found remained independently of the prescription of other psychotropics. Another analysis in the PAQUID cohort showed that, in the absence of dementia, no difference was observed between benzodiazepine users and non-­‐users with regards to the evolution of scores evaluating cognitive functions. These results led to several assumptions about the putative mechanism explaining the relationship found between benzodiazepine use and dementia: (1) benzodiazepines could be early markers of symptoms such as anxiety, depression or insomnia, which are potential prodromes or risk factors for this disease, (2) these drugs could also reduce the ability to use cognitive reserve in order to cope with early lesions of the disease during the preclinical stage, (3) the association found could also result from these two mechanisms., Ce travail porte sur l’étude du risque de démence chez les personnes âgées ayant consommé des benzodiazépines. Ces médicaments méritent une attention particulière du fait de (i) leur utilisation trop systématique et le plus souvent chronique contrairement aux recommandations préconisant des durées d’utilisation courtes (ii) leurs effets délétères sur la cognition demeurant mal évalués à long terme. La plupart des études conduites sur ce sujet ont conclu à une augmentation du risque de démence chez les sujets ayant utilisé des benzodiazépines. Un biais protopathique pouvait cependant, en partie du moins, avoir expliqué ces résultats : la prescription de benzodiazépines pouvait avoir été motivée par des prodromes souvent observés au cours des années précédant le diagnostic de la maladie. Afin de mieux prendre en considération ce biais, le projet BENZODEM a utilisé les ressources de la cohorte PAQUID (3777 sujets ≥ 65 ans tirés au sort sur les listes électorales de Dordogne et Gironde bénéficiant d’un suivi de plus de 20 ans). Ce projet, combinant deux études de cohorte et une étude cas-­‐témoins, a conclu à un risque de démence augmenté de 46 à 62% chez les utilisateurs de benzodiazépines et retardé de 5 à 15 ans par rapport à l’initiation du traitement. La seconde partie du programme (BENZODEM2) a consisté en une étude cas-­‐témoins conduite sur un large échantillon de sujets de plus de 65 ans enregistrés sur la base de données de la Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Ce programme a permis (1) de valider les précédents résultats (risque augmenté de 30 à 80% en fonction de la dose, la durée du traitement et la nature des molécules) (2) d’identifier les profils de consommation associés à un excès de risque : consommateurs de plus de 3 mois avec une relation dose-­‐effet marquée et molécules à longue demi-­‐ vie d’élimination. Des explorations complémentaires ont permis de conclure que cet excès de risque n’était pas expliqué par une mortalité différentielle entre groupes comparés ni par la prescription d’autres médicaments psychotropes. Une autre étude menée sur PAQUID montrait une absence de différence entre consommateurs et non consommateurs de benzodiazépines vis-­‐à-­‐vis de l’évolution des scores mesurant les fonctions cognitives. Ces résultats ont permis d’émettre des hypothèses concernant le mécanisme de l’association entre utilisation de benzodiazépines et démence: (1) les benzodiazépines pourraient constituer des marqueurs précoces de la maladie ; (2) les benzodiazépines pourraient aussi diminuer les capacités de recours à la réserve cognitive en réponses aux lésions précoces de la maladie au stade préclinique ; (3) il est aussi possible que ces deux explications soient combinées.