Search

Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of cancer. However, increasing use of immune-based therapies, including the widely used class of agents known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, has exposed a discrete group of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Many of these are driven by the same immunologic mechanisms responsible for the drugs' therapeutic effects, namely blockade of inhibitory mechanisms that suppress the immune system and protect body tissues from an unconstrained acute or chronic immune response. Skin, gut, endocrine, lung and musculoskeletal irAEs are relatively common, whereas cardiovascular, hematologic, renal, neurologic and ophthalmologic irAEs occur much less frequently. The majority of irAEs are mild to moderate in severity; however, serious and occasionally life-threatening irAEs are reported in the literature, and treatment-related deaths occur in up to 2% of patients, varying by ICI. Immunotherapy-related irAEs typically have a delayed onset and prolonged duration compared to adverse events from chemotherapy, and effective management depends on early recognition and prompt intervention with immune suppression and/or immunomodulatory strategies. There is an urgent need for multidisciplinary guidance reflecting broad-based perspectives on how to recognize, report and manage organ-specific toxicities until evidence-based data are available to inform clinical decision-making. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) established a multidisciplinary Toxicity Management Working Group, which met for a full-day workshop to develop recommendations to standardize management of irAEs. Here we present their consensus recommendations on managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Objective: Total joint replacement has been proposed as an endpoint in disease modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); however, disparities have generated concerns regarding this outcome. A combined Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI)/Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative was launched in 2004 to develop a composite index ['virtual total joint replacement' (VJR)] as a surrogate outcome for osteoarthritis (OA) progression in DMOAD RCTs. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of patients fulfilling different thresholds of sustained pain, reduced function, and X-ray change in existing DMOAD RCTs.Design: Post hoc analysis of summary data from the placebo arm of eight DMOAD RCTs.Results: Eight OA RCTs representing 1379 patients were included. Pain was assessed by WOMAC and/or VAS and function by WOMAC and/or Lequesne. Among six knee and two hip studies, 248 (22%) and 132 (51%) patients respectively had X-ray progression [decrease joint space width (JSW) ≥0.5 mm]. The prevalence of patients fulfilling clinical and radiographic criteria was highest (n = 163, 12%) in the least stringent scenario (pain + function ≥80 at ≥2 visits); with few patients (n = 129, 2%) in the most stringent scenario (pain + function ≥80 at ≥4 visits). Using these prevalence data, a sample size of 352-2144 per group would be needed to demonstrate a 50% difference between groups.Conclusions: The prevalence of patients with sustained symptomatic OA of at least a moderate degree with X-ray progression is low. Even using lenient criteria to define VJR, large patient numbers would be required to detect differences between groups in DMOAD RCTs. Investigation of the optimal cutoff threshold and combination of symptoms and radiographic change should be pursued. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To examine immunization responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with rituximab and to investigate the effects of rituximab-induced CD20+ B cell depletion on immune responses to tetanus toxoid (T cell-dependent antigen), pneumococcal polysaccharide (T cell-independent antigen), and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) (neoantigen) and on delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). METHODS: In a controlled trial, we enrolled 103 patients with active RA receiving a stable dose of methotrexate (MTX). Tetanus toxoid, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and KLH vaccines as well as a Candida albicans skin test were administered to 1 group of patients receiving rituximab plus MTX (called rituximab-treated patients) for 36 weeks and to 1 group of patients receiving MTX alone for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a >/=4-fold rise in antitetanus IgG levels. Antitetanus, antipneumococcal, and anti-KLH serum IgG levels were measured prior to and 4 weeks following vaccine administration. The DTH response to C albicans was measured 2-3 days following placement. RESULTS: Responses to tetanus toxoid vaccine (>/=4-fold rise) were similar in both groups (39.1% of rituximab-treated patients and 42.3% of patients treated with MTX alone). The ability to maintain a positive DTH response to the C albicans skin test was comparable in both groups (77.4% of rituximab-treated patients and 70% of patients treated with MTX alone), showing no effect of rituximab treatment. Rituximab-treated patients had decreased responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (57% of patients had a 2-fold rise in titer in response to >/=1 serotype, compared with 82% of patients treated with MTX alone) and to KLH vaccine (47% of patients had detectable anti-KLH IgG, compared with 93% of patients treated with MTX alone). CONCLUSION: Recall responses to the T cell-dependent protein antigen tetanus toxoid as well as DTH responses were preserved in rituximab-treated RA patients 24 weeks after treatment. Responses to neoantigen (KLH) and T cell-independent responses to pneumococcal vaccine were decreased, but many patients were able to mount responses. These data suggest that polysaccharide and primary immunizations should be administered prior to rituximab infusions to maximize responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate the effect of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab treatment on anemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Data from patients with RA who received infliximab or placebo in the multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized ATTRACT, ASPIRE, and START studies were included in this post-hoc, pooled analysis. Infliximab (3 to 10 mg/kg) was administered every 4 or 8 weeks, and all patients received stable doses of methotrexate (MTX). We determined the percentage of anemic patients (baseline hemoglobin level <12 g/dL) who had an increase from baseline in hemoglobin level greater than or equal to 1 or 2 g/dL or achieved normal hemoglobin level at week 22. The association of improvement in anemia with improvement in clinical parameters was also evaluated. Results Among patients with anemia at baseline, infliximab plus MTX treatment produced a significantly greater mean (standard deviation) increase in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 22 (0.74 [1.12], P < 0.0001) than placebo plus MTX (0.30 [0.92]). Significantly (P < 0.001) greater proportions of anemic patients treated with infliximab plus MTX had either at least a 1 g/dL (40%) or at least a 2 g/dL (12%) increase in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 22 or achieved normal hemoglobin level (43%) when compared with placebo plus MTX (19, 5, and 28%, respectively). Greater improvement in hemoglobin level among infliximab plus MTX-treated patients was consistently observed across subgroups and in patients without clinical response (American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria) at week 22. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the effect of infliximab plus MTX on anemia was independent of improvement in disease activity. Conclusion Treatment with infliximab plus MTX significantly improved hemoglobin level among anemic RA patients when compared with treatment with placebo plus MTX, even after adjusting for improvement in disease activity. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee causes significant morbidity and current medical treatment is limited to symptom relief, while therapies able to slow structural damage remain elusive. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (CS), alone or in combination, as well as celecoxib and placebo on progressive loss of joint space width (JSW) in patients with knee OA.Methods: A 24-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted at 9 sites in the United States as part of the Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT), enrolled 572 patients with knee OA who satisfied radiographic criteria (Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade 2 or grade 3 changes and JSW of at least 2 mm at baseline). Patients with primarily lateral compartment narrowing at any time point were excluded. Patients who had been randomized to 1 of the 5 groups in the GAIT continued to receive glucosamine 500 mg 3 times daily, CS 400 mg 3 times daily, the combination of glucosamine and CS, celecoxib 200 mg daily, or placebo over 24 months. The minimum medial tibiofemoral JSW was measured at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in JSW from baseline.Results: The mean JSW loss at 2 years in knees with OA in the placebo group, adjusted for design and clinical factors, was 0.166 mm. No statistically significant difference in mean JSW loss was observed in any treatment group compared with the placebo group. Treatment effects on K/L grade 2 knees, but not on K/L grade 3 knees, showed a trend toward improvement relative to the placebo group. The power of the study was diminished by the limited sample size, variance of JSW measurement, and a smaller than expected loss in JSW.Conclusion: At 2 years, no treatment achieved a predefined threshold of clinically important difference in JSW loss as compared with placebo. However, knees with K/L grade 2 radiographic OA appeared to have the greatest potential for modification by these treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with 50 mg of etanercept twice a week plus weekly methotrexate (MTX; > or =15 mg) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had a suboptimal response to 50 mg of etanercept once a week plus weekly MTX (> or =15 mg). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled study, suboptimal responders to treatment with MTX plus etanercept 50 mg once weekly were given MTX plus etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (n = 160) or MTX plus etanercept 50 mg once weekly plus a placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks. In a subsequent 12-week open-label period, patients who responded to etanercept 50 mg twice weekly decreased their dosage to 50 mg once weekly, those who had a partial response to etanercept 50 mg once weekly increased their dosage to 50 mg twice weekly, and those who had no response to etanercept 50 mg twice weekly were discontinued. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a response on the Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized; 187 completed 12 weeks, and 102 completed 24 weeks. At week 12 (double-blind period), the DAS28 response in the 50 mg twice weekly and the 50 mg once weekly groups was not significantly different (45.6% versus 35.0%; P = 0.285), and similar proportions of patients in the groups taking 100 mg and 50 mg experienced adverse events (34.4% versus 37.5%; P = 0.711). Serious adverse events occurred in 7 of 160 of the 50 mg twice weekly group and 0 of 40 of the 50 mg once weekly group (P = 0.387), and serious infectious events occurred in 3 of 160 patients in the 50 mg twice weekly group (P = 0.884). CONCLUSION: Etanercept 50 mg once weekly is an optimal dosage in most patients with RA. Increasing the dosage from 50 mg once weekly to 50 mg twice weekly in suboptimal responders did not significantly improve their DAS28 responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates have slowed the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) in animal models and have decreased pain in states of high bone turnover. The Knee OA Structural Arthritis (KOSTAR) study, which is the largest study to date investigating a potential structure-modifying OA drug, tested the efficacy of risedronate in providing symptom relief and slowing disease progression in patients with knee OA. METHODS: The study group comprised 2,483 patients with medial compartment knee OA and 2-4 mm of joint space width (JSW), as determined using fluoroscopically positioned, semiflexed-view radiography. Patients were enrolled in 2 parallel 2-year studies in North America and the European Union. These studies evaluated the efficacy of risedronate at dosages of 5 mg/day, 15 mg/day, 35 mg/week (in Europe), and 50 mg/week (in North America) compared with placebo in reducing signs and symptoms, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and patient global assessment (PGA) scores, and in slowing radiographic progression. RESULTS: A reduction of approximately 20% in signs and symptoms, as measured by WOMAC subscales and PGA scores, was observed in all groups, with no treatment effect of risedronate demonstrated. Risedronate did not significantly reduce radiographic progression as measured by decreased JSW or using a dichotomous definition of progression (joint space loss of >or=0.6 mm). Thirteen percent of patients receiving placebo demonstrated significant disease progression over 2 years. A dose-dependent reduction in the level of C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type II collagen, a cartilage degradation marker associated with progressive OA, was seen in patients who received risedronate. No increase in the number of adverse events was demonstrated for risedronate compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Although risedronate (compared with placebo) did not improve signs or symptoms of OA, nor did it alter progression of OA, a reduction in the level of a marker of cartilage degradation was observed. A sustained clinically relevant improvement in signs and symptoms was observed in all treatment and placebo groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare effectiveness of tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and across tofacitinib lines of therapy, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using US CorEvitas RA Registry data., Methods: Analysis included patients with RA initiating tofacitinib or TNFi with a 12-month follow-up visit between November 2012-February 2021. Primary (Clinical Disease Activity Index-defined low disease activity [CDAI-LDA: CDAI ≤ 10]) and secondary (clinical/disease activity/patient-reported) effectiveness outcomes were assessed at month 12. Outcomes were stratified by treatment regimen (overall tofacitinib vs overall TNFi/tofacitinib monotherapy vs tofacitinib combination therapy/TNFi monotherapy vs TNFi combination therapy/tofacitinib monotherapy vs TNFi combination therapy/tofacitinib combination therapy vs TNFi combination therapy), or tofacitinib line of therapy (2nd/3rd/ ≥ 4th line)., Results: 3,481 eligible patients initiated tofacitinib (n = 805) or TNFi (n = 2,676). Improvements in effectiveness at month 12 were generally similar across treatment regimens; 25.1% and 30.1% of overall tofacitinib and TNFi initiators achieved CDAI-LDA, respectively (odds ratio 1.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 1.76]). Odds ratios (95% CIs) for achieving CDAI-LDA at 12 months were 0.70 (0.36, 1.37) for 3rd- versus 2nd-line, and 1.09 (0.63, 1.88) for 3rd- versus ≥ 4th-line tofacitinib initiators. At month 12, mean change from baseline in CDAI was greater among 3rd- versus ≥ 4th-line tofacitinib initiators, and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire and patient-reported pain were greater in 3rd- versus 2nd-line and ≥ 4th- versus 3rd-line tofacitinib initiators., Conclusions: Generally, there were no differences in effectiveness between tofacitinib versus TNFi regimens. Few differences were observed between tofacitinib lines of therapy; sample sizes were small for 2nd/3rd-line initiators., Study Registration: NCT01402661 (ClinicalTrials.gov; July 25, 2011). Key Points • Using data from the US CorEvitas rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Registry, this study compared the effectiveness of tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and across tofacitinib lines of therapy. • Effectiveness of tofacitinib was similar to TNFi regimens up to month 12, while differences in some effectiveness outcomes at month 12 were observed with tofacitinib across different lines of therapy. • The findings of this study may inform future treatment decision-making in patients with RA., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical standards: This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice. All participating investigators were required to obtain full institutional review board (IRB) board approval for conducting non-interventional research involving human patients with a limited dataset. Sponsor approval and continuing review were obtained from the New England Independent Review Board (no. 120160610). For academic investigative sites that did not receive authorization to use the central IRB, full board approval was obtained from the respective governing IRBs, and documentation of approval was submitted to CorEvitas, LLC prior to the initiation of any study procedures. All patients in the registry were required to provide written informed consent and authorization prior to participating in the study. Competing interests: LRH has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer Inc, and Roche, is a member of a speakers' bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, and is an employee and shareholder of CorEvitas, LLC. COB has received grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb and has acted as consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, and Sanofi. JEP has received grant and/or research support from AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi, Mallinckrodt, Pfizer Inc, and Seattle Genetics, has acted as consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, EMERALD, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer Inc, Sandoz, Samsung, and Viatris, and has been a speaker/advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer Inc, Sandoz, UCB, and Viatris, JOB, PCM, and MY are employees of CorEvitas, LLC. CR-T was an employee of CorEvitas, LLC at the time of the analysis, and is currently affiliated with Harvard School of Public Health. LLS and KRM were employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc at the time of the analysis. AS is an employee and shareholder of Pfizer Inc., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Clifton Bingham has previously served as a consultant to Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi in patient reported outcomes. Clifton Bingham and Susan Bartlett both serve on the Board of Directors of the PROMIS Health Organization. Neither author has received remuneration for this manuscript.

Objective: To determine if higher serum exposure during subcutaneous (SC) abatacept treatment was associated with an increased infection risk in adult patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Data from AVERT-2 (Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment-2, NCT02504268), a randomized, placebo-controlled study in anticitrullinated protein antibody- positive patients with early RA, were analyzed. A post hoc population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed. Association between steady-state abatacept concentration exposures (steady-state time-averaged serum concentration, steady-state trough serum concentration, steady-state maximum serum concentration) and first infection was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots of probability versus time on treatment and Cox proportional-hazards models., Results: PK of SC abatacept was defined as a linear 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination; higher body weight was the only covariate with a clinically relevant effect in the final PPK model. Infections occurred in 330/693 (47.6%; 11/693 [1.6%] serious infections) patients treated with abatacept+methotrexate (MTX) and 134/301 (44.5%; 4/301 [1.3%] serious infections), with abatacept placebo+MTX. Exposure-response analysis demonstrated no exposure relationship for an increased risk of first infection with concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoids during the induction period, baseline glucocorticoid use, or higher than median body weight at baseline (> 70 kg)., Conclusion: This exposure-response analysis of AVERT-2 showed no increase in the risk of first infection, regardless of abatacept exposure level in patients with RA treated with SC abatacept. Similarly, no effect on the risk of first infection was found for concomitant MTX and glucocorticoid use in patients with RA treated with SC abatacept+MTX.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in fatigue measured by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received sarilumab and to assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful change., Methods: Data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials of patients with RA who received sarilumab-MOBILITY, TARGET, and MONARCH-were evaluated. The 10 RA-relevant items from the 13-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue were scored in the PROMIS T score metric. Mean changes in 10-item PROMIS-Fatigue T score (PROMIS-Fatigue 10a) were compared, proportions of patients reporting meaningful within-person change thresholds were assessed, and results were visualized using empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) curves., Results: Patients with RA reported high baseline fatigue. Using PROMIS-Fatigue 10a, at week 24, patients receiving 150 or 200 mg sarilumab every other week in MOBILITY and TARGET had rapidly and significantly improved mean levels of fatigue compared to those who received placebo. When compared to patients who received adalimumab in MONARCH, patients who received sarilumab had a trend toward increased improvement. eCDF curves showed separation between active treatment versus placebo with both sarilumab doses and across the score range for improvement. Higher proportions of patients reported three-, five-, and seven-point improvements in PROMIS-Fatigue scores in groups who received active treatment., Conclusion: Substantial proportions of patients with RA who received sarilumab reported meaningful change in fatigue measured by PROMIS-Fatigue 10a over time. This study demonstrates the ability to convert FACIT-Fatigue score onto the PROMIS T score metric, the rapid reduction in fatigue with biologic therapies, and the use of novel eCDF curves to show individual patient-level change., (© 2024 The Author(s). ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Chikungunya fever (CHIKF) is an acute viral disease caused by the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes. The acute phase presents with limited symptoms and low mortality, but approximately half of cases progress to more chronic illness with persistent and disabling joint symptoms. To better characterize the burden of chronic disease, we analyzed the relationship between pain intensity, the Disease Activity Index by DAS28-ESR, rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, sex, and age in a retrospective cohort of 133 patients with chikungunya arthritis (CHIKA). We assessed all subjects by clinical evaluations, and laboratory testing, including the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR), and RF measurement. We observed that pain intensity increased significantly with disease activity (ρ = 0.416 and p-value < 0.05) and with age (ρ = 0.259 and p-value = 0.003). Despite a predominance of women in our cohort, sex/gender was not associated with increased pain risk. Our study demonstrated a strong correlation between pain and disease activity, but assessment of these variables in a larger, prospective cohort should be undertaken to further characterize risk variables and improve therapy for patients with CHIKA., (Copyright ©2024, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.)

Objective: Adaptive immunity mediates psoriatic disease pathogenesis. We aimed to identify novel psoriatic autoantigens and their phenotypic associations in deeply characterized patient cohorts., Methods: Sera from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients were used for autoantibody discovery. Immunoprecipitations performed with cell lysates were on-bead digested, and autoantigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Prevalence and clinical features associated with anti-SRY-Box transcription factor-D (SOX-D) antibodies were determined by screening discovery cohorts of patients with PsA (n = 135), patients with psoriasis without PsA (n = 24), and healthy controls (n = 41). A PsA validation cohort (n = 325) and disease control samples of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 66) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n = 66) were assayed for anti-SOX5 antibodies. Disease characteristics were compared by antibody status. Longitudinal data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with patient-specific intercept to ascertain associations. We also tested PsA sera for the recently described anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibody in PsA., Results: The novel autoantigens identified were SOX-D transcription factors, with SOX-5 being the focus of this analysis. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were present in 8.9% (12 of 135) and 4.3% (14 of 323) of patients in the PsA discovery and validation cohorts, respectively, 12.5% of patients (3 of 24) in the psoriasis group, 2.4% (1 of 41) of healthy controls, and 7.6% (5 of 66) each of patients in the RA and SLE groups. Anti-SOX5 were associated with female sex in both PsA cohorts (discovery: 15.7% women, 2.6% men, P = 0.006; validation: 6.3% women, 1.4% men, P = 0.049). In a longitudinal analysis adjusted for sex, anti-SOX5 associated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (95% vs 61%; P = 0.001; n = 96) and with differences in estimated treatment effects by mechanism of action. Anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies were identified in 8 of 124 patients (6.5%) in the PsA group., Conclusion: SOX-D transcription factors are novel psoriatic autoantigens. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were preferentially found in women with PsA and associated with specific clinical and treatment characteristics, suggesting that anti-SOX5 antibodies may identify mechanistic subgroups. We independently validated anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies in PsA., (© 2024 The Author(s). ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background/objective: To determine if anti-RA33 antibodies, which can be seen in early forms of inflammatory arthritis, are present in patients with Lyme arthritis (LA)., Methods: Anti-RA33 antibodies were tested using a commercially available assay in patients with LA (n = 47) and compared with patients with erythema migrans who returned to health (EM RTH, n = 20) and those with post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD) (n = 50), characterized by noninflammatory arthralgia, as an observational comparative study utilizing Lyme-exposed patients from various original cohorts., Results: We found that anti-RA33 was present in higher proportions of patients with LA (23.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and PTLD (12.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.040) than healthy controls. There was also a trend toward a higher percentage of anti-RA33 positivity in patients with EM RTH versus controls (10.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.080). There were no statistically significant differences among groups of patients with LA, PTLD, and EM RTH ( p ≥ 0.567). There was also no difference in the proportion of patients with antibiotic-responsive LA compared with those with persistent synovitis after antibiotics, termed post-infectious LA, and there were no differences in clinical manifestations, musculoskeletal ultrasound evaluation (synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler, tendinopathy), or patient-reported outcomes based on anti-RA33 status., Conclusions: This is the first study to identify anti-RA33 antibodies in patients with LA, though these antibodies did not identify a unique clinical subset of patients in this cohort. Unexpectedly, we found anti-RA33 antibodies at similar levels in patients with PTLD and EM RTH; further study is needed to determine the relevance of this finding., Competing Interests: E.D. is a current employee of AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Patients with cancer and an underlying autoimmune disease who are considering immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) need to know about the benefits and risks of severe immune-related adverse events and flares of the autoimmune condition., Objective: This study aims to develop and alpha test an educational website for patients with cancer., Methods: Learning topics, images, and website architecture (including flow and requirements) were developed and iteratively reviewed by members of a community scientist program, a patient advisory group, and content experts. Alpha testing was performed, measuring the site's usability using the Suitability Assessment of Materials and its acceptability using the Ottawa Acceptability Measure., Results: The website included a home page; general information about ICBs; comprehensive modules on the benefits and risks of ICBs for patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune diseases; general wellness information; and features such as a quiz, additional resources, and a glossary. For the alpha testing, 9 users assessed the newly developed website. Patient reviewers (n=5) had rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, Sjogren syndrome, or vasculitis. Health care provider reviewers (n=4) were medical oncologists or rheumatologists. The median Suitability Assessment of Materials rating was 75 (IQR 70-79; range 0-100) for patients versus 66 (IQR 57-72; range 0-100) for providers (scores ≥70 indicate no substantial changes needed). Recommendations for improvement, mostly involving navigation and accessibility, were addressed. All participants expressed that the website was acceptable and balanced in terms of discussion of benefits and harms. Because half (2/4, 50%) of the providers suggested we increase the amount of information, we extended the content on the impact of having an autoimmune disease when considering ICB treatment, the probability of flares, and the management of flares in this context., Conclusions: The feedback led to minor revisions to enhance readability, navigation, and accessibility, ensuring the website's suitability as a decision-making aid. The newly developed website could become a supporting tool to facilitate patient-physician discussion regarding ICBs., (©Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Gabrielle F Duhon, McKenna Cherry, Huifang Lu, Cassandra Calabrese, Mehmet Altan, Hussain Tawbi, Alexa Meara, Clifton O Bingham, Adi Diab, Viola B Leal, Robert J Volk. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 25.10.2024.)

Background: Preclinical rheumatoid arthritis (Pre-RA) is defined as the early stage before the development of clinical RA. While cachexia is a well-known and potentially modifiable complication of RA, it is not known if such an association exists also in the Pre-RA stage. To investigate such issue, we aimed to compare the longitudinal alterations in the muscle composition and adiposity of participants with Pre-RA with the matched controls., Methods: In this observational cohort study, the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants were categorized into Pre-RA and propensity score (PS)-matched control groups. Pre-RA was retrospectively defined as the absence of RA from baseline to year-2, with progression to physician-diagnosed clinical RA between years 3-8 of the follow-up period. Using a validated deep learning algorithm, we measured MRI biomarkers of thigh muscles and adiposity at baseline and year-2 follow-ups of the cohort. The outcomes were the differences between Pre-RA and control groups in the 2-year rate of change for thigh muscle composition [cross-sectional area (CSA) and intramuscular adipose tissue (Intra-MAT)] and adiposity [intermuscular adipose tissue (Inter-MAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT)]. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used for comparison., Results: After 1:3 PS-matching of the groups for confounding variables (demographics, risk factors, co-morbidities, and knee osteoarthritis status), 408 thighs (102 Pre-RA and 306 control) of 322 participants were included (age mean ± SD: 61.7 ± 8.9 years; female/male: 1.8). Over a 2-year period, Pre-RA was associated with a larger decrease in total thigh muscle CSA [estimate, 95% confidence interval (CI): -180.13 mm 2 /2-year, -252.80 to -107.47, P-value < 0.001]. Further examination of thigh muscle composition showed that the association of the presence of Pre-RA with a larger decrease in muscle CSA over 2 years was noticeable in the quadriceps, flexors, and sartorius muscle groups (P-values < 0.05). Comparison of changes in total adipose tissue showed no difference between Pre-RA and control participants (estimate, 95% CI: 48.48 mm 2 /2-year, -213.51 to 310.47, P-value = 0.691). However, in the detailed analysis of thigh adiposity, Pre-RA presence was associated with a larger increase in Inter-MAT (estimate, 95% CI: 150.55 mm 2 /2-year, 95.58 to 205.51, P-value < 0.001)., Conclusions: Preclinical rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a decrease in muscle cross-sectional area and an increase in intermuscular adipose tissue, similar to rheumatoid cachexia in clinical rheumatoid arthritis. These findings suggest the presence of cachexia in the preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis. Given that cachexia, which can exacerbate health outcomes, is potentially modifiable, this study emphasizes the importance of early identification of patients in their preclinical phase., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in multiple cancers. ICI's mechanism of action involves immune system activation to augment anti-tumor immunity. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), were excluded from initial ICI clinical trials due to concern that such immune system activation could precipitate an autoimmune disease flare or new, severe immune related adverse events (irAE). In the present study, we report our experience with ICIs in patients with pre-existing SSc., Methods: Patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were identified from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Through chart review and prespecified definitions, we identified whether patients experienced worsening SSc activity or new irAEs. SSc disease activity worsening was pre-defined as an increase in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), new scleroderma renal crisis, progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on CT scan, increased Raynaud's phenomenon frequency or severity, new pulmonary hypertension, or myositis flare. IrAEs also included active inflammatory arthritis and dermatitis., Results: Eight patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were included. Overall, SSc symptoms remained stable during and after ICI therapy. None of the patients with long-standing sine or limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) had progressive skin thickening after ICI therapy. One patient, who was early in his diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) disease course, experienced worsening skin thickening and renal crisis. Three patients (38 %) experienced a total of five irAEs (grade 2: diarrhea, mucositis and dermatitis; grade 3: pneumonitis, and grade 4: nephritis). The patient with grade 4 nephritis developed scleroderma renal crisis and immune checkpoint related nephritis simultaneously. There were no deaths due to irAEs., Conclusion: In this study, ICI therapy was well tolerated in patients with longstanding, sine or lcSSc. IrAE were common but generally manageable. Patients with early, active SSc may be at greater risk from ICI therapy, but more research is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ami Shah reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health. Christopher Mecoli reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health. Laura Cappelli reports was provided by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health. Rachel Wallwork reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health. Rachel Wallwork reports financial support was provided by The Jerome L Greene Foundation. Ami Shah reports financial support was provided by The Donald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler Foundation. Rachel Wallwork reports financial support was provided by The Rheumatology Research Foundation. Clifton Bingham reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Laura Cappelli reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Laura Cappelli reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: consulting or advisory. Ami Shah reports a relationship with Kadmon Corporation that includes: funding grants. Ami Shah reports a relationship with Arena Pharmaceuticals that includes: funding grants. Ami Shah reports a relationship with Medpace LLC that includes: funding grants. Ami Shah reports a relationship with Eicos Sciences that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Positive emotions are a promising target for intervention in chronic pain, but mixed findings across trials to date suggest that existing interventions may not be optimized to efficiently engage the target. The aim of the current pilot mechanistic randomized controlled trial was to test the effects of a positive emotion-enhancing intervention called Savoring Meditation on pain-related neural and behavioral targets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Participants included 44 patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (n = 29 included in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses), who were randomized to either Savoring Meditation or a Slow Breathing control. Both meditation interventions were brief (four 20-minute sessions). Self-report measures were collected pre-and post-intervention. An fMRI task was conducted at post-intervention, during which participants practiced the meditation technique on which they had been trained while exposed to non-painful and painful thermal stimuli. Savoring significantly reduced experimental pain intensity ratings relative to rest (P < .001). Savoring also increased cerebral blood flow in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and increased connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and caudate during noxious thermal stimulation relative to Slow Breathing (z = 2.3 voxelwise, false discovery rate cluster corrected P = .05). Participants in the Savoring condition also reported significantly increased positive emotions (ps < .05) and reduced anhedonic symptoms (P < .01) from pre- to post-intervention. These findings suggest that Savoring recruits reward-enhancing corticostriatal circuits in the face of pain, and future work should extend these findings to evaluate if these mechanisms of Savoring are associated with improved clinical pain outcomes in diverse patient populations. PERSPECTIVE: Savoring Meditation is a novel positive emotion-enhancing intervention designed for patients with chronic pain. The present findings provide preliminary evidence that Savoring Meditation is acutely analgesic, and engages neural and subjective emotional targets that are relevant to pain self-management. Future work should evaluate the clinical translation of these findings., (Copyright © 2024 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To develop a set of detailed definitions for foundational domains commonly used in OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) core domain sets., Methods: We identified candidate domain definitions from prior OMERACT publications and websites and publications of major organizations involved in outcomes research for six domains commonly used in OMERACT Core Domain Sets: pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, patient global assessment, and health-related quality of life. We conducted a two-round survey of OMERACT working groups, patient research partners, and then the OMERACT Technical Advisory Group to establish their preferred domain definitions. Results were presented at the OMERACT 2023 Methodology Workshop, where participants discussed their relevant lived experience and identified potential sources of variability giving the needed detail in our domain definitions., Results: One-hundred four people responded to both rounds of the survey, and a preferred definition was established for each of the domains except for patient global assessment for which no agreement was reached. Seventy-five participants at the OMERACT 2023 Methodology Workshop provided lived experience examples, which were used to contextualise domain definition reports for each of the five domains., Conclusion: Using a consensus-based approach, we have created a detailed definition for five of the foundational domains in OMERACT core domain sets; patient global assessment requires further research. These definitions, although not mandatory for working groups to use, may facilitate the initial domain-match assessment step of instrument selection, and reduce the time and resources required by future OMERACT groups when developing core outcome sets., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest COB, MB, RC, CH, CLH, SG, FK, BJS, GAW - No conflicts DEB: Member of Management team at OMERACT, co-chair of methods group and technical advisory group of OMERACT. PC: Member, OMERACT Management Committee. AB: Received research grants for Abbvie and Lilly and fees for lectures or consultations from Abbvie, UCB, Novartis, Galapagos and Pfizer, all to her department and unrelated to the topic of this manuscript. EC has received research grants from Bio-Cancer, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, consultancy from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Biocon, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, RPharm and Sanofi, speakers fee from Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myer Squibbs, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kai, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, RPharm, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. AD has the following relationships unrelated to the conduct of this study: Chair of the International Myositis Assessment & Clinical Studies Group (not for profit) Chair of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Annual Planning Committee for Pediatric Radiology (not for profit), Co-Chair of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Pediatric Imaging Research Committee (not for profit), Chair of the Bias in Recruitment, Hiring, Promotion, Awards Committee of the Canadian Association of Radiology (not for profit), and PI of research grants from Novo Nordisk, the Terry Fox Foundation, the PSI Foundation, the Society of Pediatric Radiology, and the Garron Family Cancer Centre, unrelated to the topic of this manuscript. MADA: Grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer. Royalties or licenses from Elsevier. Consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, UCB. Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen, Novartis. BH: OMERACT 2023 conference in Colorado Springs. Paid by OMERACT to support my role a Patient Research Partner. CJ: Seed funding grants for unrelated project (pilot trial of opioids used after total joint replacement surgery) from ANZMUSC ($19,956), Arthritis Australia ($20,000) and Wiser Healthcare ($4000). Casual payments from OMERACT for hours spent creating an unrelated e-learning series (technician role) in 2022–2023. Registration, flight and accommodation costs covered by OMERACT for attendance at OMERACT Colorado Springs 2023. Current member of ECR committee of ANZMUSC SLM reports: Consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Pfizer; Investigator on clinical trials for Sanofi, GSK, Sparrow; speaking/lecturing on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Vifor, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis and AbbVie; chief investigator on STERLING-PMR trial, funded by NIHR; patron of the charity PMRGCAuk. No personal remuneration was received for any of the above activities. Support from Roche/Chugai to attend EULAR2019 in person and from Pfizer to attend ACR Convergence 2021 virtually. SLM is supported in part by the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, the National Health Service or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. AM: Consulting fees from Sanofi, Abbvie, Amgen. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sobi, Sanofi, Abbvie. Registration, flight and accommodation costs covered by OMERACT for attendance at OMERACT Colorado Springs 2023. LJM is a paid staff member of OMERACT. LSS is on the Management Committee of OMERACT and is Chair, Finance Committee of OMERACT. YY (Katy)L is supported by National Medical Research Council of Singapore. AbbVie, DKSH, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer- Speaker fee and honorarium paid to me. AbbVie, DKSH, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer - Research sponsorship paid to institution. APLAR: Travel and accommodation to APLAR congresses. GRAPPA: Travel and accommodation to GRAPPA congresses. Co-Chair of Scientific Committee of Asia Pacific League of Associations of Rheumatology, APLAR - No payment. Education committee of Group for Research and Assessment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, GRAPPA -No payment. PT: Consulting Fees from Reformulary Group. An independent Committee Member for clinical trial Data Safety Monitoring Boards for FDA approved trials being conducted by: UCB Biopharma GmbH & SPRL, Parexel International, Prahealth Sciences. I am [unpaid] Chair of the Management Group of a registered non-profit independent medical research organization, OMERACT, whose goal is to improve and advance the health outcomes for patients suffering from musculoskeletal conditions. OMERACT receives arms-length funding from 11 companies: Abbvie, Astra Zenaca, Aurinia, BMS, Centrexion, GSK, Horizon Pharma Inc, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer & Sparrow. ZT: Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group: Co-chair American College of Rheumatology Criteria development subcommittee., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine baseline risk factors for requiring immunosuppression and having persistent arthritis in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-inflammatory arthritis)., Methods: Participants were adults with rheumatologist diagnosed ICI-inflammatory arthritis. The primary outcome was requirement of conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) DMARDs; other outcomes were persistence of inflammatory arthritis >6 months after ICI cessation and requirement of CSs. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between clinical features and primary and secondary outcomes, with adjustment for potential confounders, as appropriate., Results: One hundred and twenty-six patients with ICI-inflammatory arthritis were included; 53 patients (42%) required a csDMARD/bDMARD. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, higher clinical disease activity index (CDAI), tenosynovitis, longer symptom duration before first rheumatology visit and longer ICI duration were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of requiring DMARDs; in addition, there was a trend towards those treated with prior chemotherapy being less likely to need DMARDs. After adjustment, tenosynovitis, longer symptom duration and higher CDAI remained associated with requiring DMARDs, while those with prior chemotherapy were significantly less likely to require DMARDs. Combination anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4)/PD-1 (Programmed cell death protein-1) therapy and CS use at baseline were associated with a higher risk of persistent inflammatory arthritis., Conclusion: Higher levels of disease activity, tenosynovitis and longer symptom duration prior to rheumatology referral were associated with requiring DMARDs for ICI-inflammatory arthritis, while those treated previously with chemotherapy were less likely to require additional immunosuppression. The presence of risk factors for severe disease at baseline may indicate a role for higher initial CS dose, earlier rheumatology referral, and adoption of immunosuppression beyond CSs to improve outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: This real-world analysis assessed baseline demographics/characteristics and treatment patterns/effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating tofacitinib (TOF) in the US CorEvitas RA Registry., Methods: The primary analysis of this study included patients with RA initiating TOF with a 12-month follow-up visit from November 2012 to January 2021. Outcomes included baseline demographics/characteristics and TOF initiation/discontinuation reasons, treatment patterns, and effectiveness (disease activity and patient-reported outcomes [PROs] at 12 months); the primary effectiveness outcome was Clinical Disease Activity Index low disease activity (CDAI LDA). All data, analyzed descriptively, were stratified by TOF regimen (monotherapy vs combination therapy), line of therapy (second- to fourth-line), time of initiation (2012-2014, 2015-2017, or 2018-2020), and dose (5 mg twice daily vs 11 mg once daily)., Results: Of 2874 patients with RA who initiated TOF, 1298 had a qualifying 12-month follow-up visit; of these, 43.1% were monotherapy and 66.5% were fourth-line therapy. Overall, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (40.8%) were the most common treatment immediately prior to TOF initiation. The most common reason for TOF initiation (among those with a reason) was lack/loss of efficacy of prior treatment (67.7%). Overall, at 12 months, 31.9% and 10.1% had achieved CDAI LDA and remission, respectively; 22.4%, 10.4%, and 5% had achieved ≥ 20%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% improvement in modified American College of Rheumatology core set measures, respectively; and improvements in PROs were observed. Effectiveness was generally similar across TOF stratifications., Conclusion: TOF effectiveness (CDAI LDA) was observed in a US real-world setting of patients with RA regardless of TOF regimen, line of therapy, time of initiation, and dose. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04721808)., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Although anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPAs) are a hallmark serological feature of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the mechanisms and cellular sources behind the generation of the RA citrullinome remain incompletely defined. Peptidylarginine deiminase IV (PAD4), one of the key enzymatic drivers of citrullination in the RA joint, is expressed by granulocytes and monocytes; however, the subcellular localization and contribution of monocyte-derived PAD4 to the generation of citrullinated autoantigens remain underexplored. In this study, we demonstrate that PAD4 displays a widespread cellular distribution in monocytes, including expression on the cell surface. Surface PAD4 was enzymatically active and capable of citrullinating extracellular fibrinogen and endogenous surface proteins in a calcium dose-dependent manner. Fibrinogen citrullinated by monocyte-surface PAD4 could be specifically recognized over native fibrinogen by a panel of eight human monoclonal ACPAs. Several unique PAD4 substrates were identified on the monocyte surface via mass spectrometry, with citrullination of the CD11b and CD18 components of the Mac-1 integrin complex being the most abundant. Citrullinated Mac-1 was found to be a target of ACPAs in 25% of RA patients, and Mac-1 ACPAs were significantly associated with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles, higher C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels, and more erosive joint damage. Our findings implicate the monocyte cell surface as a unique and consequential site of extracellular and cell surface autoantigen generation in RA., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:E.D. is an author on licensed patent no. US8975033, entitled “Human autoantibodies specific for PAD3 which are cross-reactive with PAD4 and their use in the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases.” E.D. has also received grants from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb related to RA, personal fees from Celgene and Gilead outside of the submitted work, and is a current employee of AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no competing interest.

Background: Given that autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) are associated with erosive disease in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this study was conducted to compare the clinical and prognostic use of anti-PAD4 antibodies in patients with early and established RA., Methods: Sera from patients with early (duration <2 years; n = 422) or established (duration ≥2 years; n = 359) RA from two randomized clinical trials of tofacitinib ± methotrexate compared with adalimumab + MTX or MTX alone were evaluated for the presence of anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4 antibodies at baseline and posttreatment time points. Summary statistics were calculated for demographic, clinical, and serological characteristics, and generalized estimating equations were used to model clinical outcomes by disease duration according to anti-PAD4 status., Results: Anti-PAD4 antibodies were present in 22% and 40% of patients with early and established RA, respectively, stable following treatment, and associated with baseline joint damage only in established RA. In early RA, baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with a greater improvement in disease activity score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein levels after treatment compared with individuals with negative anti-PAD4 (P = 0.049). Tofacitinib ± MTX was more broadly efficacious than MTX alone at improving clinical outcomes in early and established RA, irrespective of anti-PAD4 status (P < 0.05 for all), whereas adalimumab + MTX exhibited differential benefits in achieving disease activity score remission in early RA (P = 0.036) and American College of Rheumatology 20 responses in established RA (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Differences in prevalence, clinical associations, and treatment-response outcomes according to anti-PAD4 antibody status in early and established RA suggests the existence of a therapeutic window to prevent the accumulation of irreversible joint damage in early patients with RA with anti-PAD4 antibodies., (© 2023 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have higher pain and worse functional outcomes compared to men, even when treated with similar medications. The objective of this study was to identify sex differences in pain intensity, pain interference, and quantitative sensory tests (QST), which are independent of inflammation, in patients with RA., Methods: This study is a post hoc analysis of participants in the Central Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort. Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Pain interference was measured using a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computerized adaptive test. QST included pressure pain detection thresholds, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Women and men were compared using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age, education, race, research site, depression, obesity, RA disease duration, swollen joint count, and C-reactive protein., Results: Mean ± SD pain intensity was 5.32 ± 2.29 among women with RA, compared to 4.60 ± 2.23 among men with RA (adjusted difference 0.83 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.14, 1.53]). Women with RA had lower pressure pain detection thresholds at the trapezius (adjusted difference -1.22 [95% CI -1.73, -0.72]), wrist (adjusted difference -0.57 [95% CI -1.07, -0.06]), and knee (adjusted difference -1.10 [95% CI -2.00, -0.21]). No statistically significant differences in pain interference, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation were observed., Conclusion: Women reported higher pain intensity and lower pressure pain detection thresholds (higher pain sensitivity) than men. However, pain interference, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation did not differ between men and women., (© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to medication-induced immunosuppression that impairs host defenses. The aim of this study was to assess antibody and B cell responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in IA patients receiving immunomodulatory therapies. Adults with IA were enrolled through the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center and compared with healthy controls (HC). Paired plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were collected prior to and 30 days or 6 months following the first two doses of mRNA vaccines (D2; HC=77 and IA=31 patients), or 30 days following a third dose of mRNA vaccines (D3; HC=11 and IA=96 patients). Neutralizing antibody titers, total binding antibody titers, and B cell responses to vaccine and Omicron variants were analyzed. Anti-Spike (S) IgG and S-specific B cells developed appropriately in most IA patients following D3, with reduced responses to Omicron variants, and negligible effects of medication type or drug withholding. Neutralizing antibody responses were lower compared to healthy controls after both D2 and D3, with a small number of individuals demonstrating persistently undetectable neutralizing antibody levels. Most IA patients respond as well to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines as immunocompetent individuals by the third dose, with no evidence of improved responses following medication withholding. These data suggest that IA-associated immune impairment may not hinder immunity to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in most individuals., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Lee, Figueroa, Sachithanandham, Li, Connolly, Shapiro, Chen, Jones, Dhara, Towns, Lee, Peralta, Milstone, Betenbaugh, Debes, Blankson, Sitaras, Yoon, Thompson, Bingham, Klein, Pekosz and Bailey.)

Positive emotions are a promising target for intervention in chronic pain, but mixed findings across trials to date suggest that existing interventions may not be optimized to efficiently engage the target. The aim of the current mechanistic randomized controlled trial was to test the effects of a single skill positive emotion-enhancing intervention called Savoring Meditation on pain-related neural and behavioral targets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Participants included 44 patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of RA (n=29 included in fMRI analyses), who were randomized to either Savoring Meditation or a Slow Breathing control. Both meditation interventions were brief (four 20-minute sessions). Self-report measures were collected pre- and post-intervention. An fMRI task was conducted at post-intervention, during which participants practiced the meditation technique on which they had been trained while exposed to non-painful and painful thermal stimuli. Relative to Slow Breathing, Savoring significantly reduced experimental pain intensity ratings relative to rest (p<.001), increased cerebral blood flow in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and increased connectivity between the vmPFC and caudate during noxious thermal stimulation (z=2.3 voxelwise, FDR cluster corrected p=0.05). Participants in the Savoring condition also reported significantly increased positive emotions ( p s<.05) and reduced anhedonic symptoms ( p <.01) from pre- to post-intervention. These findings suggest that that Savoring recruits reward-enhancing corticostriatal circuits in the face of pain, and future work should extend these findings to evaluate if these mechanisms of Savoring are associated with improved clinical pain outcomes in diverse patient populations.

Objectives: To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy., Methods: Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations., Results: In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval., Conclusions: In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disorders and cancer considering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) need to receive balanced information about the benefits and risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and flare-ups of their autoimmune disease. To assess the learning needs of patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease regarding ICI treatment, we interviewed 29 patients with autoimmune disease and cancer from a comprehensive cancer center, of whom 20 had received ICI and 9 were candidates to receive ICI at a US Cancer Center. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted from August 2021 and January 2022. Interviewee's opinions and preferences about content and information delivery methods were collected. We recorded and transcribed interviews and analyzed them using thematic analysis. Half of the participants were female, and their median (SD) age was 62.9 (±10.9) years. The identified health information needs included the following: (1) information on irAEs and autoimmune disease flare-ups; (2) benefits of ICI; (3) ICI mechanism in the context of autoimmune disease; (4) management of flare-ups; (5) reasons for stopping or modifying cancer or autoimmune disease treatment; (6) likelihood of autoimmune disease progression or organ damage; and (7) lifestyle changes that could help avoid irAEs. Patients who had received ICI and those who had not yet received treatment reported similar needs, although patients who had received ICI had more questions about cancer treatment modifications. Patients also expressed the need to better understand when to contact their provider and how to share information with multiple providers. Most patients wanted to receive information in visual formats for review at home and at their own pace. Patients expressed interest in having educational tools to facilitate shared decision-making with their physicians, and they identified several areas of health information concerning therapy with ICI. They also highlighted the importance of communication among their various providers.