Search

Your search keyword '"Birre, Déborah"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Birre, Déborah"
5 results on '"Birre, Déborah"'

3. Quelle est la plus belle orchidée de France métropolitaine ?

Author

Birre, Déborah, Geniez, Philippe, Mouquet, Nicolas, Deter, Julie, Schatz, Bertrand, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (UMR MARBEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud]), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), and Schatz, Bertrand

Subjects
[SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Abstract

International audience

Published
2019

5. Spatial dynamics of alpine tree lines under global warming: What explains the mismatch between tree densification and elevational upward shifts at the tree line ecotone?

Author

Feuillet, Thierry, Birre, Déborah, Milian, Johan, Godard, Vincent, Clauzel, Céline, and Serrano‐Notivoli, Roberto

Subjects
*TIMBERLINE, *GLOBAL warming, *AERIAL photographs, *LOGISTIC regression analysis, *ATMOSPHERIC temperature, *REGRESSION analysis
Abstract

Aim: Most studies focusing on the alpine tree line responses to climate warming have used either the tree densification within the ecotone or its elevational upshift as indicators. However, it is acknowledged that the relationship between densification and upshift is spatially heterogeneous, making inferences and comparability among studies tricky. The lack of consistent empirical evidence on this potential mismatch and its drivers leads us to focus on this issue in this study. The aim was twofold: (a) to quantify the mismatch between the two processes at a regional scale, and (b) to identify its site‐specific determinants. Taxon: Pinus uncinata (Ramond ex DC.) Location: French eastern Pyrenees. Methods: An object‐oriented supervised classification procedure was performed on historical (1953) and current (2015) aerial photographs. Based on the resulting rasters, densification of the tree line ecotone and upward shift of the tree line were estimated at the two dates in 191 sites, then standardized, before finally being compared. Three site clusters were derived (no mismatch, densification prevalence and upshift prevalence). After having characterized their spatial patterns through join count statistics, a multinomial logistic regression model was computed to identify the correlates of these clusters among a list of site variables. Results: No spatial pattern among the categories of responses emerges at a local scale, but buffers with no mismatch tend to aggregate at a larger scale. Changes in minimum air temperatures, site elevation, mean slope, slope morphometry and lithology appear as significant drivers of the observed mismatch, implying that the relationship between densification and elevational upshift is context specific. Main conclusions: Our findings suggest that both densification and upshift should be considered in quantitative analyses of tree line spatial dynamics, since these two ecological processes are not controlled by the same drivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results