1. Nerd Harassment and Grade Inflation: Are College Admissions Policies Partly Responsible?
- Author
-
Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. and Bishop, John H.
- Abstract
Many, but not all, of the admissions selection criteria favored by U.S. colleges and universities unwittingly create incentives for educational dysfunctional behavior by secondary students, teachers and administrators, and by voters in school budget referenda. These include nerd harassment, peer cultures that denigrate achievement, various efforts by students to take the easy road to graduation, and practices by teachers that reward students who have not really done the work. Tests, such as the Scholastic Assessment Tests and the ACT Assessment, do not really assess the material that students should learn. They are actually aptitude tests, and aptitude has become the leading consideration in college admission. There is evidence that curriculum-based external examinations improve teacher-student relationships and the norms of the student peer culture. Many of the dysfunctional effects of basing admissions decisions on course grades and rank in class could be eliminated if colleges had perfect information about the instructional quality and grading standards of each course taught at each high school and then could adjust the grades to a common metric. Of course, this is not possible, but some adjustments can be made to admissions policies. Especially useful would be the use of curriculum-based external assessments in place of the current college entrance examinations. (Contains 2 figures, 12 endnotes, and 37 references.) (SLD)
- Published
- 2003