1. Early prone positioning does not improve the outcome of patients with mild pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2: results from an open-label, randomised controlled trial (the EPCoT Study)
- Author
-
Fezzi, M, Antolini, L, Soria, A, Bisi, L, Iannuzzi, F, Sabbatini, F, Rossi, M, Limonta, S, Rugova, A, Columpsi, P, Squillace, N, Foresti, S, Pollastri, E, Valsecchi, M, Migliorino, G, Bonfanti, P, Lapadula, G, Fezzi, Miriam, Antolini, Laura, Soria, Alessandro, Bisi, Luca, Iannuzzi, Francesca, Sabbatini, Francesca, Rossi, Marianna, Limonta, Silvia, Rugova, Alban, Columpsi, Paola, Squillace, Nicola, Foresti, Sergio, Pollastri, Ester, Valsecchi, Maria Grazia, Migliorino, Guglielmo Marco, Bonfanti, Paolo, Lapadula, Giuseppe, Fezzi, M, Antolini, L, Soria, A, Bisi, L, Iannuzzi, F, Sabbatini, F, Rossi, M, Limonta, S, Rugova, A, Columpsi, P, Squillace, N, Foresti, S, Pollastri, E, Valsecchi, M, Migliorino, G, Bonfanti, P, Lapadula, G, Fezzi, Miriam, Antolini, Laura, Soria, Alessandro, Bisi, Luca, Iannuzzi, Francesca, Sabbatini, Francesca, Rossi, Marianna, Limonta, Silvia, Rugova, Alban, Columpsi, Paola, Squillace, Nicola, Foresti, Sergio, Pollastri, Ester, Valsecchi, Maria Grazia, Migliorino, Guglielmo Marco, Bonfanti, Paolo, and Lapadula, Giuseppe
- Abstract
Background: Prone positioning (PP) is routinely used among patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). However, its utility among spontaneously breathing patients is still debated. Methods: In an open-label randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients hospitalised with mild COVID-19 pneumonia, whose PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) was >200 mmHg and who did not require MV or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) at hospital admission. Patients were randomised 1:1 to PP on top of standard of care (intervention group) versus standard of care only (controls). The primary composite outcome included death, MV, CPAP and P/F <200 mmHg; secondary outcomes were oxygen weaning and hospital discharge. Results: Sixty-one subjects were enrolled, 29 adjudicated to PP and 32 to the control group. By day 28, 24/61 (39.3%) patients met the primary outcome: 16 because of P/F ratio <200 mmHg, 5 CPAP and 3 MV. Three patients died. Using an intention-to-treat approach, 15/29 patients in PP group versus 9/32 controls met the primary outcome, corresponding to a significantly higher risk of progression among those randomised to PP (HR 2.38 [95%CI 1.04-5.43]; p=0.040). Using an as-treated approach, which included in the intervention group only patients who maintained PP for ≥3 h·day-1, no significant differences were found between the two groups (HR 1.77; [95%CI 0.79-3.94]; p=0.165). Also, we did not find any statistically significant difference in terms of time to oxygen weaning or hospital discharge between study arms, in any of the analyses conducted. Conclusions: We observed no clinical benefit from PP among spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring conventional oxygen therapy.
- Published
- 2023