Search

Background Hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) are common, costly, and national patient safety priority. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI), and falls are common HACs. Clinicians assess each HAC risk independent of other conditions. Prevention strategies often focus on the reduction of a single HAC rather than considering how actions to prevent one condition could have unintended consequences for another HAC. Objectives The objective of this study is to design an empirical framework to identify, assess, and quantify the risks of multiple HACs (MHACs) related to competing single-HAC interventions. Methods This study was an Institutional Review Board approved, and the proof of concept study evaluated MHAC Competing Risk Dashboard to enhance clinicians' management combining the risks of CAUTI, HAPI, and falls. The empirical model informing this study focused on the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI, which may impact HAPI and falls. A multisite database was developed to understand and quantify competing risks of HACs; a predictive model dashboard was designed and clinical utility of a high-fidelity dashboard was qualitatively tested. Five hospital systems provided data for the predictive model prototype; three served as sites for testing and feedback on the dashboard design and usefulness. The participatory study design involved think-aloud methods as the clinician explored the dashboard. Individual interviews provided an understanding of clinician's perspective regarding ease of use and utility. Results Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed. Clinicians favored a dashboard gauge design composed of green, yellow, and red segments to depict MHAC risk associated with the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI and possible adverse effects on HAPI and falls. Conclusion Participants endorsed the utility of a visual dashboard guiding clinical decisions for MHAC risks preferring common stoplight color understanding. Clinicians did not want mandatory alerts for tool integration into the electronic health record. More research is needed to understand MHAC and tools to guide clinician decisions.

BACKGROUND Black boys and men from disinvested communities are disproportionately survivors and perpetrators of youth violence. Those presenting to emergency departments with firearm-related injuries also report recent substance use. However, young Black men face several critical individual and systemic barriers to accessing trauma-focused prevention programs. These barriers contribute to service avoidance, the exacerbation of violence recidivism, substance use relapse, and a revolving-door approach to prevention. In addition, young Black men are known to be digital natives. Therefore, technology-enhanced interventions offer a pragmatic and promising opportunity to mitigate these barriers, provide vital life skills for self-led behavior change, and boost service engagement with vital community resources. OBJECTIVE The study aims to systematically adapt and pilot-test Boosting Violence-Related Outcomes Using Technology for Empowerment, Risk Reduction, and Life Skills Preparation in Youth Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (BrotherlyACT), a culturally congruent, trauma-focused digital psychoeducational and service-engagement tool tailored to young Black men aged 15-24 years. BrotherlyACT will incorporate microlearning modules, interactive safety planning tools for risk assessment, goal-setting, mindfulness practice, and a service-engagement conversational agent or chatbot to connect young Black men to relevant services. METHODS The development of BrotherlyACT will occur in 3 phases. In phase 1, we will qualitatively investigate barriers and facilitators influencing young Black men’s willingness to use violence and substance use prevention services with 15-30 young Black men (aged 15-24 years) who report perpetrating violence and substance use in the past year and 10 service providers (aged >18 years; any gender; including health care providers, street outreach workers, social workers, violence interrupters, community advocates, and school staff). Both groups will be recruited from community and pediatric emergency settings. In phase 2, a steering group of topic experts (n=3-5) and a youth and community advisory board comprising young Black men (n=8-12) and service providers (n=5-10) will be involved in participatory design, alpha testing, and beta testing sessions to develop, refine, and adapt BrotherlyACT based on an existing skills-based program (Achieving Change Through Values-Based Behavior). We will use user-centered design principles and the Assessment, Decision, Administration, Production, Topical, Experts, Integration, Training, and Testing framework to guide this adaptation process (phase 2). In phase 3, a total of 60 young Black men will pilot-test the adapted BrotherlyACT over 10 weeks in a single-group, pretest-posttest design to determine its feasibility and implementation outcomes. RESULTS Phase 1 data collection began in September 2021. Phases 2 and 3 are scheduled to start in June 2023 and end in September 2024. CONCLUSIONS The development and testing of BrotherlyACT is a crucial first step in expanding an evidence-based psychoeducational and service-mediating intervention for young Black men involved in violence. This colocation of services shifts the current prevention strategy from telling them why to change to teaching them how. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/43842

Despite rapid growth in the popularity of smartwatches, evidence lacks regarding older adults' acceptance of smartwatches. Since most wearable sensors are not designed specifically for older adults, there is a need to examine wearability and usability challenges of wearable sensing devices faced by older adults to facilitate the use of objective measurements of health and mobility.We aimed to examine older adults' perceptions of GPS-enabled smartwatches and to identify potential barriers and facilitators of smartwatch and sensor data use.As part of a larger feasibility study, we conducted a mixed-methods study that included a descriptive content analysis of interviews and a brief usability survey with 30 participants aged 60 years and older after they had used a smartwatch for 3 days.Most participants perceived wearable activity trackers including smartwatches and sensor-based data as useful for tracking health, finding activity patterns and promoting healthy behaviours. Privacy was of little concern, leading to willingness to share activity and location data with others. Participants identified barriers to usability as clumsy design, lack of aesthetic appeal, and difficulty reading the display and using the GPS tracking function. In contrast, identified facilitators of adoption included a big display, high-tech look, self-awareness and possible behaviour change.Smartwatches have the potential of personalised detection of health deterioration and disability prevention, based on analysis of older adults' activities in free-living environments. The usefulness of this technology for older adults can be significantly increased by addressing usability issues and providing instructions on challenging features.To support sustained self-monitoring behaviours through wearable sensor devices in older adults, it is critical to examine how they perceive those devices and identify factors affecting technology acceptance that can maximise adoption.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has driven innovations in methods to sustain initiatives for the design, development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical support technology in long-term care settings while removing risk of infection for residents, family members, health care workers, researchers and technical professionals. We adapted traditional design and evaluation methodology for a mobile clinical decision support app - designated Mobile Application Information System for Integrated Evidence ("MAISIE") - to a completely digital design methodology that removes in-person contacts between the research team, developer, and nursing home staff and residents. We have successfully maintained project continuity for MAISIE app development with only minor challenges while working remotely. This digital design methodology can be implemented in projects where software can be installed without in-person technical support and remote work is feasible. Team skills, experience, and relationships are key considerations for adapting to digital environments and maintaining project momentum.

Interest in cloud-based cyberinfrastructure among higher-education institutions is growing rapidly, driven by needs to realize cost savings and access enhanced computing resources. Through a nonprofit entity, we have created a platform that provides hosting and software support services enabling researchers to responsibly build on cloud technologies. However, there are technical, logistic, and administrative challenges if this platform is to support all types of research. Software-enhanced research is distinctly different from industry applications, typically characterized by needs for lower reduced availability, greater flexibility, and fewer resources for upkeep costs. We describe a swarm environment specifically designed for research in academic settings and our experience developing an operating model for sustainable cyberinfrastructure. We also present three case studies illustrating the types of applications supported by the cyberinfrastructure and explore techniques that address specific application needs. Our findings demonstrate safer, faster, cheaper cloud services by recognizing the intrinsic properties of academic research environments.

Usability testing has historically been an in-person activity where test participants and evaluation researchers are co-located. Recruiting participants into usability studies can be a challenging endeavor especially when potential participants are concerned about time commitments and social distancing. The global COVID-19 pandemic has driven the development of remote usability testing methods. In this paper, we describe remote usability testing as it evolved during a pre-pandemic research study. We adapted our in-person usability evaluation methodology for a commercially available mHealth app to a remote usability testing methodology to accommodate potential participants during a more convenient participant-identified time. In doing so we met the needs, preferences, and availability of our participants and maintained research progress. Adapting to patient-centered needs through remote usability testing has the potential to facilitate continued research and engage potential participants due to its convenience, flexibility, and decrease constraints presented by geographic limits.

Usability testing has historically been an in-person activity where test participants and evaluation researchers are co-located. Recruiting participants into usability studies can be a challenging endeavor especially when potential participants are concerned about time commitments and social distancing. The global COVID-19 pandemic has driven the development of remote usability testing methods. In this paper, we describe remote usability testing as it evolved during a pre-pandemic research study. We adapted our in-person usability evaluation methodology for a commercially available mHealth app to a remote usability testing methodology to accommodate potential participants during a more convenient participant-identified time. In doing so we met the needs, preferences, and availability of our participants and maintained research progress. Adapting to patient-centered needs through remote usability testing has the potential to facilitate continued research and engage potential participants due to its convenience, flexibility, and decrease constraints presented by geographic limits.

Interest in cloud-based cyberinfrastructure among higher-education institutions is growing rapidly, driven by needs to realize cost savings and access enhanced computing resources. Through a nonprofit entity, we have created a platform that provides hosting and software support services enabling researchers to responsibly build on cloud technologies. However, there are technical, logistic, and administrative challenges if this platform is to support all types of research. Software-enhanced research is distinctly different from industry applications, typically characterized by needs for lower reduced availability, greater flexibility, and fewer resources for upkeep costs. We describe a swarm environment specifically designed for research in academic settings and our experience developing an operating model for sustainable cyberinfrastructure. We also present three case studies illustrating the types of applications supported by the cyberinfrastructure and explore techniques that address specific application needs. Our findings demonstrate safer, faster, cheaper cloud services by recognizing the intrinsic properties of academic research environments.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has driven innovations in methods to sustain initiatives for the design, development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical support technology in long-term care settings while removing risk of infection for residents, family members, health care workers, researchers and technical professionals. We adapted traditional design and evaluation methodology for a mobile clinical decision support app – designated Mobile Application Information System for Integrated Evidence (“MAISIE”) – to a completely digital design methodology that removes in-person contacts between the research team, developer, and nursing home staff and residents. We have successfully maintained project continuity for MAISIE app development with only minor challenges while working remotely. This digital design methodology can be implemented in projects where software can be installed without in-person technical support and remote work is feasible. Team skills, experience, and relationships are key considerations for adapting to digital environments and maintaining project momentum.

Hospital-acquired conditions such as catheter-associated urinary tract infection, stage 3 or 4 hospital-acquired pressure injury, and falls with injury are common, costly, and largely preventable. This study used participatory design methods to design and evaluate low-fidelity prototypes of clinical dashboards to inform high-fidelity prototype designs to visualize integrated risks based on patient profiles. Five low-fidelity prototypes were developed through literature review and by engaging nurses, nurse managers, and providers as participants (N = 23) from two hospitals in different healthcare systems using focus groups and interviews. Five themes were identified from participatory design sessions: Need for Integrated Hospital-Acquired Condition Risk Tool, Information Needs, Sources of Information, Trustworthiness of Information, and Performance Tracking Perspectives. Participants preferred visual displays that represented patient comparative risks for hospital-acquired conditions using the familiar design metaphor of a gauge and green, yellow, and red "traffic light" colors scheme. Findings from this study were used to design a high-fidelity prototype to be tested in the next phase of the project. Visual displays of hospital-acquired conditions that are familiar in display and simplify complex information such as the green, yellow, and red dashboard are needed to assist clinicians in fast-paced clinical environments and be designed to prevent alert fatigue.