Search

Laureano J. Kamiya and colleagues have identified two novel missense variants (Gly168Arg and Gly168Glu) in the RUNX1 gene. These variants, identified in two unrelated families with familial platelet disorder with a predisposition to acute myeloid leukaemia (FPD/AML) phenotype, were initially classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). However, functional studies of RUNX1 target genes enabled their reclassification as likely pathogenic. The findings highlight Gly168 as a new mutation hotspot in RUNX1, providing important insights for genetic counselling and leukaemia monitoring. The study emphasizes the necessity for continuous updates to diagnostic guidelines and data sharing among laboratories to improve the classification and interpretation of genetic variants. Commentary on: Kamiya et al. Two novel families with RUNX1 variants indicate glycine 168 as a new mutational hotspot: Implications for FPD/AML diagnosis. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:2327-2337., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Correct interpretation of the pathogenicity of germline RUNX1 variants is essential for FPD/AML diagnosis, clinical management and leukaemia surveillance. We report two families with clear FPD/AML phenotypic features harbouring missense variants at RHD critical residue Gly168. Although classified as of unknown significance (VUS) by RUNX1-specific curation guidelines, these variants should rather be considered likely pathogenic, as supported by computational tools, structural modelling and dysregulated platelet expression of RUNX1-targets, adding Gly168 among amino acids currently recognised as mutational hotspots. Our data could help reduce the number of variants classified as VUS, providing evidence for updating RUNX1 guidelines, thus improving FPD/AML diagnosis., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions that present significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Here, we report two cases of patients presenting with clinically significant bleeding but with unclear etiologies by conventional clinical laboratory testing. Further evaluation, utilizing a combination of high-dimensional multiplexed mass cytometry and genetic sequencing, revealed the underlying causes of bleeding in both cases, leading to definitive diagnoses. These cases underscore the potential utility of combined multimodal approaches in evaluating patients with bleeding disorders. Moreover, these high-parameter methods can offer substantial mechanistic insights and can enhance our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of IPDs. Future studies involving larger patient cohorts are needed to further validate this strategy, directly comparing its diagnostic yield and accuracy with current clinical laboratory testing approaches, which can ultimately improve patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Germline variants of the RUNX1 gene are associated with RUNX1 Familial Platelet Disorder with Associated Myeloid Malignancies (RUNX1-FPDMM), which is characterized by an increased risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and/or acute myeloid leukemia. Patients with FPDMM have also been described to develop B- or T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We present a pediatric patient with RUNX1-FPDMM that evolved into concurrent MDS and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after a decade of monitoring with serial blood counts. We aim to highlight the treatment challenges and clinical decision-making that may be anticipated in this unique disorder, as well as the potentially curative role for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the first complete remission.

Clinical assessment of platelet activation by flow cytometry is useful in the characterization and diagnosis of platelet-specific disorders and as a measure of risk for thrombosis or bleeding. Platelets circulate in a resting, "unactivated" state, but when activated they undergo alterations in surface glycoprotein function and/or expression level, exposure of granule membrane proteins, and exposure of procoagulant phospholipids. Flow cytometry provides the means to detect these changes and, unlike other platelet tests, is appropriate for measuring platelet function in samples from patients with low platelet counts. The present review will focus on flow cytometric tests for platelet activation markers., Competing Interests: Disclosure The author has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders that include both quantitative (thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis) and qualitative (thrombocytopathy) defects. To gain better knowledge about the prevalence, pathogenesis, and clinical consequences of specific diseases, to improve diagnosis and treatment of patients with IPD, and to support translational research on a genetic, molecular, and physiological basis, the THROMKIDplus study group currently comprising 24 sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland decided to establish a patient registry with associated biomaterial banking for children. This registry is designed as a retrospective-prospective, multicenter observational study and supposed to launch in the second half of 2023. Blood smears, plasma, platelet pellets, and DNA of patients will be stored in certified biomaterial banks for future translational research projects. The main inclusion criteria are (1) diagnosis of or highly suspected IPD after assessment of a THROMKIDplus competence center and (2) patients aged 0 to 17 years. Initial and follow-up data on patient history, laboratory parameters, standardized documentation of bleeding tendency, and congenital defects are collected according to good clinical practice and current data protection acts by using the MARVIN platform, a broadly used data management system supported by the German Society for Pediatric Oncology Hematology (GPOH). The THROMKIDplus study group intends to enroll ∼200 patients retrospectively and an annual amount of ∼50 patients prospectively., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

For more than 50 years, light transmission aggregometry has been accepted as the gold standard test for diagnosing inherited platelet disorders in platelet-rich plasma, although there are other functional approaches performed in whole blood. In this article, several advantages and disadvantages of this technique over other laboratory approaches are discussed in the view of recent guidelines, and the necessity of functional assays, such as light transmission aggregometry in the era of molecular genetic testing, is highlighted., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the most widely used laboratory method for an initial screening of patients with a suspected platelet function defect (PFD), and its use has also been proposed for assessing the efficacy of antiplatelet treatment (APT). An automated LTA method has been developed by Sysmex (Kobe, Japan) on a routine coagulation analyzer (CS-2400), together with a new research parameter called PAL (platelet aggregation level) to evaluate patients on APT., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the performance of CS-2400 compared to a stand-alone lumi-dual-aggregometer device in the diagnosis of PFD and in assessing the efficacy of APT. For these purposes, the study population was represented by a cohort of 23 patients with a previous diagnosis of PFD and a cohort of 28 patients on APT., Results: Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with PFD showed a statistically significant reduction (p<0.05) in the maximal %light transmission, irrespective of the agonist used, both with the CS-2400 and the lumi-dual-aggregometer. As regards PFD patients, CS-2400 was effective in identifying the more severe defects, with a good sensibility and specificity, but less effective in identifying milder forms of PFD, such as platelet secretion defects. Patients on APT showed a statistically significant (p=0.001) reduced median %light transmission and PAL scores compared to healthy controls., Discussion: Thanks to this LTA technology, CS-2400, a routine coagulation analyzer widely available in routine laboratories, could prove useful for initial assessment of patients with a suspected PFD. Moreover, the PAL scores were a fairly accurate reflection of the platelet response to APT.

Background: Platelet dysfunction plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite clinical observations indicating abnormalities in platelet parameters among IBD patients, inconsistencies persist, and these parameters lack standardization for diagnosis or clinical assessment., Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published up to December 16th, 2023. A random-effects model was employed to pool the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and plateletcrit (PCT) between IBD patients and healthy controls, and subgroup analyses were performed., Results: The meta-analysis included 79 articles with 8,350 IBD patients and 13,181 healthy individuals. The results revealed significantly increased PLT and PCT levels (WMD: 69.910, 95% CI: 62.177, 77.643 10 9 /L; WMD: 0.046%, 95% CI: 0.031%, 0.061%), and decreased MPV levels (WMD: -0.912, 95% CI: -1.086, -0.739 fL) in IBD patients compared to healthy individuals. No significant difference was found in PDW between the IBD and control groups (WMD: -0.207%, 95% CI: -0.655%, 0.241%). Subgroup analysis by disease type and disease activity showed no change in the differences for PLT, PCT, and MPV in the ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease groups, as well as the active and inactive groups. Notably, the active group exhibited significantly lower PDW levels than the control group (WMD: -1.138%, 95% CI: -1.535%, -0.741%)., Conclusions: Compared with healthy individuals, IBD patients display significantly higher PLT and PCT and significantly lower MPV. Monitoring the clinical manifestations of platelet abnormalities serves as a valuable means to obtain diagnostic and prognostic information. Conversely, proactive measures should be taken to prevent the consequences of platelet abnormalities in individuals with IBD., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023493848., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of platelet function analyzer (PFA) and The International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis bleeding-assessment-tool (ISTH-BAT) in detecting mild inherited platelet function disorders (IPFDs) in children with suspected bleeding disorders., Methods: Prospective single-center diagnostic study including consecutive patients <18 years with suspected bleeding disorder and performing a standardized workup for platelet function defects including ISTH-BAT, PFA, platelet aggregation testing, blood smear-based immunofluorescence, and next-generation sequencing-based genetic screening for IPFDs., Results: We studied 97 patients, of which 34 von Willebrand disease (VWD, 22 type-1, 11 type-2), 29 IPFDs (including delta-/alpha-storage pool disease, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome) and 34 with no diagnosis. In a model combining PFA-adenosine diphosphate (ADP), PFA-epinephrine (EPI), and ISTH-BAT overall performance to diagnose IPFDs was low with area under the curves of 0.56 (95% CI 0.44, 0.69) compared with 0.84 (95% CI 0.76, 0.92) for VWD. Correlation of PFA-EPI/-ADP and ISTH-BAT was low with 0.25/0.39 Spearman's correlation coefficients. PFA were significantly prolonged in patients with VWD and Glanzmann thrombasthenia. ISTH-BAT-scores were only positive in severe bleeding disorders, but not in children with mild IPFDs or VWD., Conclusion: Neither ISTH-BAT nor PFA or the combination of both help diagnosing mild IPFDs in children. PFA is suited to exclude severe IPFDs or VWD and is in this regard superior to ISTH-BAT in children., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The crucial role of platelets in hemostasis and their broad implications under various physiological conditions underscore the importance of accurate platelet-function testing. Platelets are key to clotting blood and healing wounds. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and management of platelet disorders are vital for patient care. This review outlines the significant advancements in platelet-function testing technologies, focusing on their working principles and the shift from traditional diagnostic methods to more innovative approaches. These improvements have deepened our understanding of platelet-related disorders and ushered in personalized treatment options. Despite challenges such as interpretation of complex data and the costs of new technologies, the potential for artificial-intelligence integration and the creation of wearable monitoring devices offers exciting future possibilities. This review underscores how these technological advances have enhanced the landscape of precision medicine and provided better diagnostic and treatment options for platelet-function disorders.

This is a celebratory reprint of a historical paper published in STH in 1998. The original Abstract follows.The PFA-100 system is a platelet function analyzer designed to measure platelet-related primary hemostasis. The instrument uses two disposable cartridges: a collagen/epinephrine (CEPI) and a collagen/ADP (CADP) cartridge. Previous experience has shown that CEPI cartridges detect qualitative platelet defects, including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-induced abnormalities, while CADP cartridges detect only thrombocytopathies and not ASA use. In this seven-center trial, 206 healthy subjects and 176 persons with various platelet-related defects, including 127 ASA users, were studied. The platelet function status was determined by a platelet function test panel. Comparisons were made as to how well the defects were identified by the PFA-100 system and by platelet aggregometry. The reference intervals for both cartridges, testing the 206 healthy subjects, were similar to values described in smaller studies in the literature (mean closure time [CT] of 132 seconds for CEPI and 93 seconds for CADP). The use of different lot numbers of cartridges or duplicate versus singleton testing revealed no differences. Compared with the platelet function status, the PFA-100 system had a clinical sensitivity of 94.9% and a specificity of 88.8%. For aggregometry, a sensitivity of 94.3% and a specificity of 88.3% were obtained. These values are based on all 382 specimens. A separate analysis of sensitivity by type of platelet defect, ASA use versus congenital thrombocytopathies, revealed for the PFA-100 system a 94.5% sensitivity in identifying ASA users and a 95.9% sensitivity in identifying the other defects. For aggregometry, the values were 100% for ASA users and 79.6% for congenital defects. Analysis of concordance between the PFA-100 system and aggregometry revealed no difference in clinical sensitivity and specificity between the systems (p  > 0.9999). The overall agreement was 87.5%, with a Kappa index of 0.751. The two tests are thus equivalent in their ability to identify normal and abnormal platelet defects. Testing 126 subjects who took 325 mg ASA revealed that the PFA-100 system (CEPI) was able to detect 71.7% of ASA-induced defects with a positive predictive value of 97.8%. The overall clinical accuracy of the system, calculated from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 0.977. The data suggest that the PFA-100 system is highly accurate in discriminating normal from abnormal platelet function. The ease of operation of the instrument makes it a useful tool to use in screening patients for platelet-related hemostasis defects., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Platelet secretion disorders (PSDs) are a subgroup of platelet function disorders (PFDs) caused by defects in the content or release of platelet granules. These patients have a variable degree of mucocutaneous bleeding tendency. The diagnostic facilities of PSDs are imitated in Iran, even in specialized coagulation laboratories. The present study aims to estimate the frequency of PSDs among patients referred to the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO)., Methods: The research population includes all patients referred to the specialized coagulation laboratory of IBTO and requested platelet function and von Willebrand testing by their physicians. They were recruited between May 2022 and October 2022 if they were not diagnosed as having procoagulant defects, von Willebrand disease (VWD), Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT), Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS), and platelet count <100 × 10 9 (except in the syndromic forms). Patients with a defect in response to at least two agonists in Light transmission aggregometry (LTA), one agonist in the ATP-secretion study, and/or impairment in the expression of CD62P are considered PSDs., Results: Among 121 cases referred to our center over 6 months, 40 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ten patients were diagnosed with PSDs. Six were classified as δ-platelet secretion disorders (δ-PSD), two α-platelet secretion disorders (α-PSD), and two αδ-platelet secretion disorders (αδ-PSD)., Conclusions: The prevalence of PSDs in our population study was 25% (10/40), which seems highly prevalent. Therefore, expanding laboratory approaches to platelet function defects is necessary as a routine in our country., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is important for diagnosing platelet function disorders (PFD) and von Willebrand disease (VWD) affecting ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). Nonetheless, data is lacking on the utility of LTA for investigating thrombocytopenic patients and platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts (L-PRP). Previously, we developed a strategy for diagnostic LTA assessment of L-PRP that included: (1) acceptance of referrals/samples, regardless of thrombocytopenia severity, (2) tailored agonist selection, based on which are informative for L-PRP with mildly or severely low platelet counts, and (3) interpretation of maximal aggregation (MA) using regression-derived 95% confidence intervals, determined for diluted control L-PRP (C-L-PRP)., Methods: To further evaluate the L-PRP LTA strategy, we evaluated findings for a subsequent patient cohort., Results: Between 2008 and 2021, the L-PRP strategy was applied to 211 samples (11.7% of all LTA samples) from 192 unique patients, whose platelet counts (median [range] × 10 9 /L) for blood and L-PRP were: 105 [13-282; 89% with thrombocytopenia] and 164 [17-249], respectively. Patient-L-PRP had more abnormal MA findings than simultaneously tested C-L-PRP (p-values <0.001). Among patients with accessible electronic medical records (n = 181), L-PRP LTA uncovered significant aggregation abnormalities in 45 (24.9%), including 18/30 (60%) with <80 × 10 9  platelets/L L-PRP, and ruled out PFD, and VWD affecting RIPA, in others. The L-PRP LTA strategy helped diagnose VWD affecting RIPA, Bernard Soulier syndrome, familial platelet disorder with myeloid malignancy, suspected ITGA2B/ITGB3-related thrombocytopenia, and acquired PFD., Conclusion: Diagnostic LTA with L-PRP, using a strategy that considers thrombocytopenia severity, is feasible and informative., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Congenital thrombocytopenia/platelet disorders are heterogeneous disorders of platelet number and/or function. Pathogenic variants in the genes implicated in megakaryocyte differentiation and platelet formation cause thrombocytopenia in these patients. Recent advances have elucidated several causative genes for these disorders, but identifying the underlying causative genes remains challenging. Patients with these disorders often receive inappropriate treatments, including glucocorticoids and splenectomy, for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In Japan, we have developed a diagnostic system using high-throughput DNA sequencing with a multigene panel and established a registry. Between 2018 and 2023, 245 patients were enrolled and analyzed. Pathogenic variants in 17 genes (42 MYH9, 19 ANKRD26, 17 ITGA2B/ITGB3, 8 ACTN1, 8 WAS, 6 ETV6, 6 VWF, 5 CYCS, and 14 others) were identified in 125 patients (51.0%). An additional 29 patients (11.8%) had suspected pathogenic variants under investigation. We also found that immature platelet fraction (IPF%) is useful in the differential diagnosis because the median IPF% in MYH9 disorders, 48.7%, was significantly higher than in all other groups (chronic ITP, 13.4%; controls, 2.6%). The results of this study provide new insight into congenital thrombocytopenia/platelet disorders.

Background: Patients suspected of platelet function defects represent a diagnostic challenge for the clinical laboratory, mainly due to the complexity and poor standardization of screening methods. We compared a new flow-based chip-equipped point-of-care (T-TAS) device with lumi-aggregometry and other specific tests., Materials and Methods: The study included 96 patients suspected of platelet function defects and 26 patients referred to hospital for an evaluation of residual platelet function while on antiplatelet therapy., Results: Forty-eight of 96 patients displayed abnormal platelet function by lumi-aggregometry, and 10 of them had defective granule content and were classified as δ-storage pool disease (δ-SPD). T-TAS compared favorably with lumi-aggregometry in detecting the most severe forms of platelet function defects (i.e., δ-SPD) [test agreement (lumi-light transmission aggregometry [lumi-LTA] vs T-TAS) for the δ-SPD subgroup was 80% and K CHOEN 0.695. T-TAS was less sensitive to milder platelet function defects (i.e., primary secretion defects [PSD]). Concerning patients on antiplatelets, test agreement (lumi-LTA vs T-TAS) in detecting patients who were responders to this therapy was 54%; K CHOEN 0.150., Discussion: The results indicate that T-TAS can detect the more severe forms of platelet function defects such as δ-SPD. There is limited agreement of T-TAS with lumi-aggregometry in identifying responders to antiplatelets. However, this poor agreement is commonly shared by lumi-aggregometry and other devices owing to the lack of test specificity and of prospective data from clinical trials linking platelet function with therapeutic efficacy.

The ISTH-BAT is a structured bleeding assessment tool to record and help diagnose patients with possible bleeding disorders. However, a few studies evaluated the utility of ISTH-BAT in diagnosing patients with platelet function defects (PFDs). In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of ISTH-BAT in predicting PFDs among patients suspected of PFDs. Forty patients suspected of PFDs and 21 normal healthy controls were evaluated by the ISTH-BAT scoring system, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), ATP-releasing assays (lumi-aggregometry), and expression of CD62P for diagnosis of PFDs. Among 40 patients suspected of PFDs, 10 were diagnosed as PFDs using lumiaggregometry and CD62P. The ISTH-BAT score in patients suspected of PFDs [(6, interquartile range (IQR) 1-8] and patients with PFDs was significantly higher than the control group (0; IQR 0-0) ( P  < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves indicate that ISTH-BAT is not able to discriminate patients with PFDs from those without PFDs (areas under the curve of 0.620 (95% confidence interval 0.415-0.825). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ISTH-BAT in predicting the presence of PFDs, respectively, were 40, 73.3, 33.3, and 78.6% in the cut-off ISTH-BAT at least 4 in adult men, at least 6 in adult women, and at least 3 in children (age < 18). The ISTH-BAT scoring system has good discriminatory power in diagnosing patients with PFDs from healthy controls but is ineffective in differentiating them from those without PFDs., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Definite diagnosis of patients with mild to moderate bleeding is challenging. Some studies reported that even more than 50% of their patients remained undiagnosed which is classified as a Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC). This study aims to document the clinical characteristics and proportion of patients with BDUC in the Iranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center (ICHCC) one of the referral centers for diagnosis of congenital bleeding disorder in Iran., Methods: This study was conducted on 397 patients who were referred with a bleeding manifestation to ICHCC from 2019 to 2022. Demographic and laboratory data were documented for all patients. Bleeding questionnaires including ISTH-Bleeding Assessment tool (ISTH-BAT) and the Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 (MCMDM-1 (ISTH-BAT, MCMDM-1, and the Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBLAC) were filled out for all patients. The data were analyzed by the statistical package for social science (SPSS version 22, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA)., Results: BDUC was diagnosed in 200 patients and 197 patients reached the final diagnosis. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), factor (F) VII deficiency, and platelet functional disorders (PFDs) were confirmed in 54, 49, 34, and 15 of the patients, respectively. No significant difference was found in bleeding scores between patients with BDUC and those with confirmed disease. In contrast, after setting cut-off (ISTH-BAT for males ≥ 4 and females ≥ 6 and MCMDM-1 for males ≥ 3 and females ≥ 5) clinically significant difference was found. There was no association between having a positive consanguineous marriage and setting a diagnosis; however, significant associations were seen for having a positive family history of bleeding. Age (OR =0.977, 95% CI.965-0.989), gender (BDUC female, 151/200; final diagnosis female, 95/197) (OR=3.3, 95% CI 2.16-5.06), family history (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.99-5.11), and consanguineous marriage (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.03-2.45) were considered as a risk factor for categorizing the patients with BDUC or final diagnosis., Conclusion: The findings are mainly in line with previous studies about BDUC patients. The large number of patients with BDUC underlines the incompleteness of available routine laboratory tests and shows the necessity of progress in the development of reliable diagnostic tools to identify underlying bleeding disorders., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None, (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by normal or reduced platelet counts, bleeding diatheses of varying severities, and the presence (syndromic) or absence (non-syndromic) of involvement of other organs. Due to the lack of highly specific platelet function tests and overlapping clinical and laboratory features, diagnosing the underlying cause of IPDs remains challenging. In recent years, genetic testing via next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies to rapidly analyze multiple genes has gradually emerged as an important part of the laboratory investigation of patients with IPDs. A systemic clinical and laboratory testing approach and thorough phenotype and genotype correlation studies of both patients and their family members are crucial for accurate diagnoses of IPDs., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical flow cytometry tests for inherited and acquired platelet disorders are useful diagnostic tools but are not widely available. Flow cytometric methods are available to detect inherited glycoprotein deficiencies, granule release (secretion defects), drug-induced thrombocytopenias, presence of antiplatelet antibodies, and pharmacodynamic inhibition by antiplatelet agents. New tests take advantage of advanced multicolor cytometers and allow identification of novel platelet subsets by high-dimensional immunophenotyping. Studies are needed to evaluate the value of these new tests for diagnosis and monitoring of therapy in patients with platelet disorders., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a heterogeneous group of rare entities caused by molecular divergence in genes relevant for platelet formation and function. A rational diagnostic approach is necessary to counsel and treat patients with IPDs. With the introduction of high-throughput sequencing at the beginning of this millennium, a more accurate diagnosis of IPDs has become available. We discuss advantages and limitations of genetic testing, technical issues, and ethical aspects. Additionally, we provide information on the clinical significance of different classes of variants and how they are correctly reported., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Platelets are key drivers of hemostasis. Low platelet counts, dysfunction in platelet adhesion, and aggregation lead to increased bleeding tendency. Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) form a highly heterogeneous group of rare diseases with variable bleeding tendency. IPDs may be associated with other signs and symptoms often referred to as "syndromic." The underlying genetic defect may prone patients to develop hematopoietic diseases such as leukemia. Over the last decade, accumulating knowledge in genetics has led to the detection of many "new" platelet disorders. However, still many patients with a well-described platelet dysfunction remain undetected until severe bleeding occurs., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are rare diseases characterized by reduced blood platelet counts and/or impaired platelet function. Recognizing IPDs is advisable but often challenging. The diagnostic tools include clinical evaluation, platelet function tests, and molecular analyses. Demonstration of a pathogenic genetic variant confirms IPDs. We established a method to assess the platelet phenotype on blood smears using immunofluorescence microscopy as a diagnostic tool for IPDs., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to validate immunofluorescence microscopy as a screening tool for IPDs in comparison with genetic screening., Methods: We performed a blinded comparison between the diagnosis made using immunofluorescence microscopy on blood smears and genetic findings in a cohort of 43 families affected with 20 different genetically confirmed IPDs. In total, 76% of the cases had inherited thrombocytopenia., Results: Immunofluorescence correctly predicted the underlying IPD in the vast majority of patients with 1 of 9 IPDs for which the typical morphologic pattern is known. Thirty of the 43 enrolled families (70%) were affected by 1 of these 9 IPDs. For the other 11 forms of IPD, we describe alterations of platelet structure in 9 disorders and normal findings in 2 disorders., Conclusion: Immunofluorescence microscopy on blood smears is an effective screening tool for 9 forms of IPD, which include the most frequent forms of inherited thrombocytopenia. Using this approach, typical changes in the phenotype may also be identified for other rare IPDs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The international study ThromboGenomics has evaluated the diagnostic rate using a targeted multigene panel test for the screening of inherited bleeding, thrombotic and platelet disorders., Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the results of the implementation of genetic testing for inherited bleeding, thrombotic and platelet disorders in Belgian clinical practice and evaluated possible reclassification of reported variants., Patients/methods: We implemented a Thrombosis-Hemostasis multigene panel test using whole exome sequencing to diagnose 487 patients recruited by 27 different Belgian hospitals with the implementation of stringent laboratory accreditation standards and by studying up to 100 diagnostic-grade genes., Results: This Thrombosis-Hemostasis multigene panel test was able to detect at least one genetic variant in 58% of the 487 patients of which 50% were (likely) pathogenic variants and the others were variants of unknown significance. Polygenic variants were detected in 65 patients (13%). A multi-step workflow for results discussion by multidisciplinary team meetings and patients' recalls for segregation studies and additional laboratory testing was set up. Variants were also submitted to the GoldVariants database from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The aim of these approaches is to optimize variant interpretation and to (re)classify variants of unknown significance as (likely) pathogenic or (likely) benign., Conclusions: The growing implementation of multigene panel tests in clinical diagnostics comes with difficulties in interpreting genetic results. Additional efforts are needed to continuously optimize the diagnostic outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare they have no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This review summarizes the time that has passed from the initial registration of the cells that turned out to be platelets up to today's advanced methodologies in platelet investigation. The first reports of "granular masses" appeared in the 1840s, but these "granular masses" remained an unsolved mystery until the 1870s. The breakthrough came in the 1873-1882 period. The cells that later turned out to be platelets were further identified by the German Professor Max Schultze, and later by Osler, who described their disk-like structure. These initial descriptions of platelets were expanded by impressive studies performed by the Italian Pathologist Bizzozero who uncovered the anatomy of platelets and described their role, first in experimental thrombosis and later in the clotting process. Nearly 20 years later, in 1906, Wright published the discovery of megakaryocytes as platelet precursors. Shortly thereafter, the clinical proof of concept illustrating the pivotal role of platelets in arresting bleeding was revealed by Duke who introduced the bleeding time test, also in this period. To investigate platelet function more specifically, light transmission aggregometry was introduced in 1962 and remains the gold standard today. This method inspired the development of several devices employing whole blood using different principles for evaluating platelet function. As of today, flow cytometry is the most advanced method and holds promise to provide new insights into platelet activation. Additionally, advances in genetic testing by the use of next-generation sequencing will allow further improvement of our ability to diagnose inherited platelet disorders., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Excessive or abnormal mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB) may impact all aspects of the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of those who live with it (PWMCB). The evidence base for the optimal diagnosis and management of disorders such as inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD), Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), and von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains thin with enormous potential for targeted research., Research Design and Methods: National Hemophilia Foundation and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network initiated the development of a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders with extensive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. They recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk., Results: WG2 detailed 38 high priority research questions concerning the biology of MCB, VWD, inherited qualitative platelet function defects, HDS/EDS, HHT, bleeding disorder of unknown cause, novel therapeutics, and aging., Conclusions: Improving our understanding of the basic biology of MCB, large cohort longitudinal natural history studies, collaboration, and creative approaches to novel therapeutics will be important in maximizing the benefit of future research for the entire MCB community.

Background: Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases that are caused by the defects in early megakaryopoiesis, proplatelet formation, and/or mature platelet function. Although genomic sequencing is increasingly used to identify genetic variants underlying IPD, this technique does not disclose resulting molecular changes that impact platelet function. Proteins are the functional units that shape platelet function; however, insights into how variants that cause IPDs impact platelet proteomes are limited., Objectives: The objective of this study was to profile the platelet proteomics signatures of IPDs., Methods: We performed unbiased label-free quantitative mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteome profiling on platelets of 34 patients with IPDs with variants in 13 ISTH TIER1 genes that affect different stages of platelet development., Results: In line with the phenotypical heterogeneity between IPDs, proteomes were diverse between IPDs. We observed extensive proteomic alterations in patients with a GFI1B variant and for genetic variants in genes encoding proteins that impact cytoskeletal processes (MYH9, TUBB1, and WAS). Using the diversity between IPDs, we clustered protein dynamics, revealing disrupted protein-protein complexes. This analysis furthermore grouped proteins with similar cellular function and location, classifying mitochondrial protein constituents and identifying both known and putative novel alpha granule associated proteins., Conclusions: With this study, we demonstrate a MS-based proteomics perspective to IPDs. By integrating the effects of IPDs that impact different aspects of platelet function, we dissected the biological contexts of protein alterations to gain further insights into the biology of platelet (dys)function., (Copyright © 2022 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Platelets play an important role regarding coagulation by contributing to thrombus formation by platelet adhesion, aggregation, and α-/δ-granule secretion. Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a very heterogeneous group of disorders that are phenotypically and biochemically diverse. Platelet dysfunction (thrombocytopathy) can be accompanied by a reduction in the number of thrombocytes (thrombocytopenia). The extent of the bleeding tendency can vary greatly. Symptoms comprise mucocutaneous bleeding (petechiae, gastrointestinal bleeding and/or menorrhagia, epistaxis) and increased hematoma tendency. Life-threatening bleeding can occur after trauma or surgery. In the last years, next-generation sequencing had a great impact on unrevealing the underlying genetic cause of individual IPDs. Because IPDs are so diverse, a comprehensive analysis of platelet function and genetic testing is indispensable., Competing Interests: Research funding from CSL Behring and Takeda (to B.Z.)., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Platelets, along with coagulation factors and vasculature, represent the three main compartments of hemostasis. Upon investigation of a suspected hemostasis disorder, platelet count, size and morphology often offer important clues to the diagnosis or help narrow the differential diagnosis. In this review, we describe a general approach to diagnosing platelet disorders, starting with easily obtained data such as findings of complete blood count (CBC) and microscopic review of a stained peripheral blood smear. We discuss general findings that help separate consumptive from underproduction thrombocytopenia. We further touch on inherited thrombocytopenia disorders after classifying them into those associated with small, normal sized or large platelets. Illustrative microscopic images are provided where contributory. We conclude with a suggested algorithmic step-by-step approach to investigating a suspected platelet disorder in children.

A single-center study was conducted on 120 patients with inherited disorders of primary hemostasis followed at our hematological center. These patients presented a variety of bleeding symptoms; however, they had no definitive diagnosis. Establishing a diagnosis has consequences for the investigation of probands in families and for treatment management; therefore, we aimed to improve the diagnosis rate in these patients by implementing advanced diagnostic methods. According to the accepted international guidelines at the time of study, we investigated platelet morphology, platelet function assay, light-transmission aggregometry, and flow cytometry. Using only these methods, we were unable to make a definitive diagnosis for most of our patients. However, next-generation sequencing (NGS), which was applied in 31 patients, allowed us to establish definitive diagnoses in six cases (variants in ANKRD26 , ITGA2B , and F8 ) and helped us to identify suspected variants ( NBEAL2 , F2 , BLOC1S6 , AP3D1 , GP1BB , ANO6 , CD36 , and ITGB3) and new suspected variants ( GFI1B , FGA , GP1BA , and ITGA2B ) in 11 patients. The role of NGS in patients with suspicious bleeding symptoms is growing and it changes the diagnostic algorithm. The greatest disadvantage of NGS, aside from the cost, is the occurrence of gene variants of uncertain significance.

The last decade has seen large increases in the number of patients registered with heritable platelet disorders in national databases of bleeding disorders. Although individually rare, collectively they are a relatively common cause of heritable bleeding. This revolution has come about through the application of high-throughput sequencing strategies and efforts to standardize diagnostic testing. There is renewed interest in established parameters such as platelet volume and utilising simple tools such as blood smears. The diagnostic yield from peripheral blood smears can be improved with new microscopy techniques that could potentially assist in determining which patients need to be referred to tertiary centres for specialist testing. A better understanding of the other clinical features that can accompany abnormalities of platelet number or function, can lead to better clinical management and prevention of serious complications. There are challenges for clinicians who need to be aware of these developments, understand the limitations of new diagnostic techniques and keep abreast of strategies for incorporation into clinical practice. This review discusses some of these approaches, the limitations that clinicians need to be aware of and techniques that may enter clinical use in the future., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Germline pathogenic variants in RUNX1 are associated with familial platelet disorder with predisposition to myeloid malignancies (FPD/MM) with intragenic deletions in RUNX1 accounting for almost 7% of all reported variants. We present two new pedigrees with FPD/MM carrying two different germline RUNX1 intragenic deletions. The aforementioned deletions encompass exons 1-2 and 9-10 respectively, with the exon 9-10 deletion being previously unreported. RNA sequencing of patients carrying the exon 9-10 deletion revealed a fusion with LINC00160 resulting in a change in the 3' sequence of RUNX1 . Expression analysis of the transcript isoform demonstrated altered RUNX1a/b/c ratios in carriers from both families compared to controls. Our data provide evidence on the impact of intragenic RUNX1 deletions on transcript isoform expression and highlight the importance of routinely performing copy number variant analysis in patients with suspected MM with germline predisposition.

Identification of disordered platelet function is important to guide peri-operative bleeding management as well as long term treatment and prognostic strategies in individuals with platelet bleeding disorders. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the current gold standard diagnostic test of platelet function is a time consuming technique almost exclusively performed in specialised laboratories and almost universally unavailable in regional centres in Australia, where there is an unmet need for access to specialised platelet function diagnostic services. 96-well plate-based aggregometry (Optimul, UK), has been utilised in research laboratories as a novel platform to investigate platelet function. We evaluated the Optimul assay at two centres in Australia, one regional and one tertiary metropolitan, to assess its feasibility as a screening test applicable to remote regional centres. Concentration-response curves were established from 45 healthy volunteers at the participating regional hospital and from 31 healthy volunteers at the tertiary institution. Optimul successfully detected anti-platelet effects in individuals taking aspirin (n=4), NSAID (n=2), clopidogrel (n=2) and dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (n=1). When tested in parallel to LTA in individuals referred for the evaluation of abnormal bleeding symptoms there was overall a very good level of agreement between Optimul and LTA [Cohen's kappa (k 2 )=0.84], supporting its role as a useful screening tool in the assessment of platelet function. Optimul assay performance was quick and the methodology simple, requiring no specialised training or resources to be implemented at either the regional or metropolitan laboratory. Widespread implementation, particularly in regional laboratories within Australia where specialised platelet function testing is unavailable, has the potential to drastically improve the inequity of access to such services., (Copyright © 2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders are important conditions that often manifest with bleeding. These disorders have heterogeneous underlying pathologies. Some are syndromic disorders with non-blood phenotypic features, and others are associated with an increased predisposition to developing myelodysplasia and leukemia. Platelet disorders can present with thrombocytopenia, defects in platelet function, or both. As the underlying pathogenesis of inherited thrombocytopenias and platelet function disorders are quite diverse, their evaluation requires a thorough clinical assessment and specialized diagnostic tests, that often challenge diagnostic laboratories. At present, many of the commonly encountered, non-syndromic platelet disorders do not have a defined molecular cause. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made over the past few decades to improve the diagnostic evaluation of inherited platelet disorders, from the assessment of the bleeding history to improved standardization of light transmission aggregometry, which remains a "gold standard" test of platelet function. Some platelet disorder test findings are highly predictive of a bleeding disorder and some show association to symptoms of prolonged bleeding, surgical bleeding, and wound healing problems. Multiple assays can be required to diagnose common and rare platelet disorders, each requiring control of preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical variables. The laboratory investigations of platelet disorders include evaluations of platelet counts, size, and morphology by light microscopy; assessments for aggregation defects; tests for dense granule deficiency; analyses of granule constituents and their release; platelet protein analysis by immunofluorescent staining or flow cytometry; tests of platelet procoagulant function; evaluations of platelet ultrastructure; high-throughput sequencing and other molecular diagnostic tests. The focus of this article is to review current methods for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function, with a focus on contemporary, best diagnostic laboratory practices, and relationships between clinical and laboratory findings.

Assessment of platelet secretion is crucial for diagnosing suspected inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD). A previous survey of the SSC on Platelet Physiology of the ISTH and a comprehensive review highlighted that most of the platelet secretion assays (PSAs) lack standardization and validation. The aim of this study was to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of PSAs for IPFD diagnosis. We surveyed 26 experts from 10 different countries using the RAND/UCLA methodology, to attain a consensus on sensitivity, specificity, feasibility, time to readout, and cost of most PSAs. Answers were then graded in three categories: appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate. Equivocal or misinterpretable statements required a second and third round survey involving 14 of the original 26 experts. We report here the consolidated results of the entire procedure. There was uniform agreement on several general statements, including that PSAs should be performed in hemostasis laboratories as first line diagnostic tests even in patients with normal platelet aggregation, and should include a δ-granule secretion marker. Among the specific assays examined, lumiaggregometry, other luciferin/luciferase-based assays, high-performance liquid chromatography methods, radiolabeled-serotonin based assays, and whole-mount transmission electron microscopy were rated as appropriate for the measurement of δ-granule release, and platelet P-selectin expression by flow cytometry and released proteins by ELISA for α-granule release. For most of the other PSAs, the expert opinions were widely dispersed. Lack of expert consensus on many PSAs clearly indicates an unmet need for rigorous standardization, multicenter comparison of results, and validation of PSAs for clinical laboratory practice., (© 2022 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Introduction: Platelet function tests are used to screen and diagnose patients with possible inherited platelet function defects (IPFD). Some acquired platelet dysfunction may be caused by certain drugs or comorbidities, which need to be excluded before testing., Aims: To identify current practice among centres performing platelet function tests in Northern Europe., Methods: A total of 14 clinical centres from Sweden (six), Finland (two), Denmark (two), Norway (one), Estonia (two) and Iceland (one) completed the survey questionnaire, the population capture area of about 29.5 million., Results: Six of the 14 (42.8%) centres providing platelet function assessment represent comprehensive treatment centres (EUHANET status). A Bleeding score (BS) or ISTH bleeding assessment tool (ISTH BAT score) is evaluated in 11/14 (78.6%) centres and family history in all. Five/14 centres (35.7%) use structured preanalytical patient instructions, and 10/14 (71.4%) recorded questionnaire on the preassessment of avoidance of any drugs or natural products affecting platelet functions. Preliminary investigations of screening tests of coagulation are performed in 10/14 (71.4%), while in 4/14 (28.6%), the diagnostic work-up of IPFD and von Willebrand disease (VWD) is performed simultaneously. The work-up of IPFD includes peripheral blood smear in 10/14 (71.4%), platelet aggregometry in all, flow cytometry in 10/14 (71.4%) and Platelet Function Analysis (PFA) in 3/11 (28.6%). Molecular genetic diagnosis is available in 7/14 (50%) centres., Conclusions: The considerable variability in the current practice illustrates the need for harmonization between the Northern European centres according to the international registers (i.e. EUHASS) and IPFD guidelines (ISTH, EHA)., (© 2022 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In patients with normal plasmatic coagulation and bleeding tendency, platelet function defect can be assumed. Congenital platelet function defects are rare. Much more commonly they are acquired. The clinical bleeding tendency of platelet function defects is heterogeneous, which makes diagnostic approaches difficult. During the years, a large variety of tests for morphological phenotyping and functional analysis have been developed. The diagnosis of platelet function defects is based on standardized bleeding assessment tools followed by a profound morphological evaluation of the platelets. Platelet function assays like light transmission aggregation, luminoaggregometry, and impedance aggregometry followed by flow cytometry are commonly used to establish the diagnosis in these patients. Nevertheless, despite great efforts, standardization of these tests is poor and in most cases, quality control is lacking. In addition, these tests are still limited to specialized laboratories. This review summarizes the approaches to morphologic phenotyping and platelet testing in patients with suspected platelet dysfunction, beginning with a standardized bleeding score and ending with flow cytometry testing. The diagnosis of a functional defect requires a good collaboration between the laboratory and the clinician., Competing Interests: K.A. received research grant from the German Red Cross. T.B. reports receiving honorarium for a scientific talk from Aspen Germany, CSL Behring, Stago gGmbH German, and research grants from the German Society of Research, the German Society for Transfusion Medicine, and German Red Cross., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: A significant challenge is faced for the genetic diagnosis of inherited platelet disorders in which candidate genetic variants can be found in more than 100 bleeding, thrombotic, and platelet disorder genes, especially within families in which there are both normal and low platelet counts. Genetic variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS) are found in a significant proportion of such patients in which functional studies are required to prove pathogenicity., Objective: To identify the genetic cause in patients with a suspected platelet disorder and subsequently perform a detailed functional analysis of the candidate genetic variants found., Methods: Genetic and functional studies were undertaken in three patients in two unrelated families with a suspected platelet disorder and excessive bleeding. A targeted gene panel of previously known bleeding and platelet genes was used to identify plausible genetic variants. Deep platelet phenotyping was performed using platelet spreading analysis, transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, and platelet function testing using lumiaggregometry and flow cytometry., Results: We report rare conserved missense variants (p.R182C and p.A183V) in TPM4 encoding tromomyosin-4 in 3 patients. Deep platelet phenotyping studies revealed similar platelet function defects across the 3 patients including reduced platelet secretion, and aggregation and spreading defects suggesting that TPM4 missense variants impact platelet function and show a disordered pattern of tropomyosin staining., Conclusions: Genetic and functional TPM4 defects are reported making TPM4 a diagnostic grade tier 1 gene and highlights the importance of including TPM4 in diagnostic genetic screening for patients with significant bleeding and undiagnosed platelet disorders, particularly for those with a normal platelet count., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Rapid platelet function testing is frequently used to determine platelet function in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). Accuracy and clinical significance of decreased platelet response detected by these tests is not well understood. We sought to determine whether VerifyNow and whole blood aggregometry (WBA) can detect poor platelet response and to elucidate its clinical significance for tICH patients., Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with isolated tICH between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, and patient outcomes were recorded. Platelet function was determined by VerifyNow and WBA testing at the time of arrival to the trauma bay and 6 hours later., Results: A total of 221 patients were enrolled, including 111 patients on no antiplatelet medication, 78 on aspirin, 6 on clopidogrel, and 26 on aspirin and clopidogrel. In the trauma bay, 29.7% and 67.7% of patients on no antiplatelet medication had poor platelet response on VerifyNow and WBA, respectively. Among patients on aspirin, 72.2% and 82.2% had platelet dysfunction on VerifyNow and WBA. Among patients on clopidogrel, 67.9% and 88.9% had platelet dysfunction on VerifyNow and WBA. Patients with nonresponsive platelets had similar in-hospital mortality (3 [3.0%] vs. 6 [6.3%], p = 0.324), tICH progression (26 [27.1%] vs. 24 [26.1%], p = 0.877), intensive care unit admission rates (34 [34.3%] vs. 38 [40.0%), p = 0.415), and length of stay (3 [interquartile range, 2-8] vs. 3.2 [interquartile range, 2-7], p = 0.818) to those with responsive platelets. Platelet transfusion did not improve platelet response or patient outcomes., Conclusion: Rapid platelet function testing detects a highly prevalent poor platelet response among patients with tICH, irrespective of antiplatelet medication use. VerifyNow correlated fairly with whole blood aggregometry among patients with tICH and platelet responsiveness detectable by these tests did not correlate with clinical outcomes. In addition, our results suggest that platelet transfusion may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with tICH., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic tests, level II., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Background: Pre-injury anti-platelet use has been associated with increased risk of progression of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TICH) and worse outcomes. VerifyNow® assays assess platelet inhibition due to aspirin/clopidogrel. This study assesses the outcomes of patients with TICH and platelet dysfunction treated with desmopressin and/or platelets., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with mild TICH at a level 1 trauma center 1/1/2013-6/1/2016. Patients with documented platelet dysfunction who received desmopressin and/or platelets were compared to those who were untreated. Primary outcomes were progression of TICH and neurologic outcomes at discharge., Results: Of 565 patients with a mild TICH, 200 patients had evidence of platelet dysfunction (a positive VerifyNow® assay). Patients had similar baseline demographics, injury characteristics, and rate of TICH progression; but patients who received desmopressin and/or platelets had worse Glasgow Outcomes Score at discharge., Conclusion: Treatment of patients with mild TICH and platelet dysfunction with desmopressin and/or platelets did not affect TICH progression but correlated with worse neurologic status at discharge., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Studies of thrombin generation (TG) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) have provided insights on bleeding disorders. We studied TG for a cohort with commonly encountered platelet function disorders (PFD)., Methods: Participants included 40 controls and 31 with PFD due to: nonsyndromic dense granule (DG) deficiency (PFD-DGD, n = 9), RUNX1 haploinsufficiency (n = 6) and aggregation defects from other, uncharacterized causes (n = 16). TG was tested with PRP and PPP samples. As DG store ADP and polyphosphate that enhance platelet-dependent TG, PFD-DGD PRP TG was tested for correction with ADP, polyphosphate and combined additives. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), platelet factor V (FV), and platelet TFPI and ANO6 transcript levels were also evaluated. Findings were tested for associations with TG endpoints and bleeding., Results: PFD samples had impaired PRP TG, but also impaired PPP TG, with strong associations between their PRP and PPP TG endpoints (P ≤ .005). PFD-DGD PRP TG endpoints showed associations to PPP TG endpoints but not to DG counts, and were improved, but not fully corrected, by adding polyphosphate and agonists. PFD participants had increased plasma TFPI and reduced platelet TFPI (P ≤ .02) but normal levels of platelet FV, and platelet TFPI and ANO6 transcripts levels. PFD plasma TFPI levels showed significant association to several PPP TG endpoints (P ≤ .04). Several PFD PRP TG endpoints showed significant associations to bleeding symptoms, including wound healing problems and prolonged bleeding from minor cuts (P ≤ .04)., Conclusion: TG is impaired in commonly encountered PFD, with their PRP TG findings showing interesting associations to symptoms., (© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) constitute a large heterogeneous group of rare bleeding disorders. These are classified into: (1) quantitative defects, (2) qualitative disorders, or (3) altered platelet production rate disorders or increased platelet turnover. Classically, IPD diagnostic is based on clinical phenotype characterization, comprehensive laboratory analyses (platelet function analysis), and, in former times, candidate gene sequencing. Today, molecular genetic analysis is performed using next-generation sequencing, mostly by targeting enrichment of a gene panel or by whole-exome sequencing. Still, the biochemical and molecular genetic characterization of patients with congenital thrombocytopathias/thrombocytopenia is essential, since postoperative or posttraumatic bleeding often occurs due to undiagnosed platelet defects. Depending upon the kind of surgery or trauma, this bleeding may be life-threatening, e.g., after tonsillectomy or in brain surgery. Undiagnosed platelet defects may lead to additional surgery, hysterectomy, pulmonary bleeding, and even resuscitation. In addition, these increased bleeding symptoms can lead to wound healing problems. Only specialized laboratories can perform the special platelet function analyses (aggregometry, flow cytometry, or immunofluorescent microscopy of the platelets); therefore, many IPDs are still undetected., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with renal failure are at increased risk of both bleeding and thrombosis. Further descriptions of laboratory investigations in these patients are required., Methods: Investigation of 24 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages IV-V with light transmission aggregometry, platelet secretion assays and platelet nucleotide analysis. Patients were in a nonbleeding state and not on antiplatelet medication. Results were compared with our local reference range used within the clinical haematology service., Results: Of the 24 patients, two had decreased responses to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen, thrombin receptor activator peptide-6 and one had decreased responses to high dose ristocetin, and one had increased response to low dose ristocetin. 11 and 13 out of 24 had abnormal platelet secretion release to collagen and thrombin, respectively. Platelet nucleotide analysis in patients was normal with the exception of a reduction in ADP content in one patient and ATP/ADP ratio in one patient., Conclusions: In our collection of patients with CKD investigated for platelet function in the nonbleeding state, they generally had normal light transmission aggregometry and nucleotide analysis but around 50% had decreased platelet secretion assays. These results could be important in determining the significance of platelet function tests in patients with bleeding symptoms and renal failure. Further characterization of platelet function tests in future will help characterize haemostasis in renal failure further., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Bleeding disorders due to platelet dysfunction are a common hematologic complication affecting patients, and typically present with mucocutaneous bleeding or hemorrhage. An inherited platelet disorder should be suspected in individuals with a suggestive family history and no identified secondary causes of bleeding. Genetic defects have been described at all levels of platelet activation, including receptor binding, signaling, granule release, cytoskeletal remodeling, and platelet hematopoiesis. Management of these disorders is typically supportive, with an emphasis on awareness, patient education, and anticipatory guidance to prevent future episodes of bleeding., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPDs) are a group of rare conditions featured by reduced circulating platelets and/or impaired platelet function causing variable bleeding tendency. Additional hematological or non hematological features, which can be congenital or acquired, distinctively mark the clinical picture of a subgroup of patients. Recognizing an IPD is challenging, and diagnostic delay or mistakes are frequent. Despite the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing, a careful phenotyping of suspected patients-concerning the general clinical features, platelet morphology, and function-is still demanded. The cornerstones of IPD diagnosis are clinical evaluation, laboratory characterization, and genetic testing. Achieving a diagnosis of IPD is desirable for several reasons, including the possibility of tailored therapeutic strategies and individual follow-up programs. However, detailed investigations can also open complex scenarios raising ethical issues in case of IPDs predisposing to hematological malignancies. This review offers an overview of IPD diagnostic workup, from the interview with the proband to the molecular confirmation of the suspected disorder. The main implications of an IPD diagnosis are also discussed., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Inherited platelet disorders (IPD) cover a heterogenous group of disorders with large differences in severity, disease mechanisms and prevalence. Pathogenic variants in more than 60 different genes, associated with megakaryocyte or platelet number and/or function, are causal of IPD. Due to disease heterogeneity IPDs are often difficult to diagnose, problematic to manage and underestimated. In the past decade, genetic diagnostics using whole-genome sequencing has revolutionised the field by identifying numerous novel genes involved in IPD aetiology as described in this review.