Search

This paper examines the interplay between country-level control of corruption (CLCC), female board representation, and corporate sustainability performance using panel data analysis with fixed effect models on a global sample of over 36,000 observations from 2016 to 2021. Our analysis was conducted in four stages: first, assessing the baseline effects of gender diversity on sustainability outcomes within the context of corruption control; second, exploring these effects across groups categorized by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); third, examining differences between developing and developed regions; and finally, analyzing regional variations across America, Europe, and Asia. The results indicate that both control of corruption and increased board diversity have significant positive effects on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores, with a highly significant interaction effect, suggesting a substantial combined influence. Additionally, analyses based on SDG alignment demonstrate that control of corruption improves ESG performance irrespective of SDG level, while board diversity benefits both high and low SDG groups. Regional analyses further reveal varied effects across America, Europe, and Asia. These findings underscore the significance of corruption control and female representation in enhancing corporate sustainability worldwide, emphasizing the potential for firms to improve ESG performance by prioritizing anti-corruption efforts and promoting board diversity. This international study contributes valuable insights into the relationship between country-level governance, corporate board composition, and sustainability outcomes across diverse contexts, highlighting the importance of tailoring sustainability policies and practices based on regional and developmental nuances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the impact of board characteristics on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of publicly listed companies in Indonesia. Focusing on firms listed in the KOMPAS100 index, the research explores how board composition, including the number of directors and commissioners, gender diversity, independence, the presence of foreign members, and the sustainability committee, influences ESG scores. Using data from Sustainalytics, financial reports, and sustainability reports, the analysis includes control variables such as public shares, return on assets, leverage, firm age, firm size, and state ownership. Significant correlations were discovered between the characteristics of the board, the sustainability committee, and the ratings related to environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG). Companies that have larger boards, a higher proportion of female and independent directors, and international members exhibit superior environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability committees contribute to the improvement of ESG outcomes. The findings indicate that implementing well-organized governance systems and having diverse board compositions are essential for successfully managing sustainability. The study utilized regression models to examine the influence of board features on ESG performance. Data from the KOMPAS100 index, which includes prominent Indonesian companies, was used for analysis. This empirical investigation offers useful insights into the ways in which corporate governance frameworks can influence sustainable business practices in the Indonesian context. Policymakers are advised to establish policies that encourage the formation of board diversity and sustainability committees. Corporate executives are recommended to optimize the composition of their boards in order to align with sustainability objectives, consequently enhancing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and attaining competitive advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Because of growing corporate tax scandals, there is an enhanced focus on corporate taxation by governments, institutions and the general public. Transparency in tax matters has been identified as critical for effectively managing and promoting socially responsible tax behaviour. This study aims to explore the impact of ownership structure, board and audit committee characteristics on corporate tax responsibility (CTR) disclosure. Design/methodology/approach: This research collected data from the annual reports of Pakistani-listed firms over 12 years, from 2009 to 2020. Consequently, the data set encompasses a total of 1,800 firm-year observations. This study uses regression analysis to test the relationship between corporate governance and CTR disclosure. Findings: The results show that board gender diversity, managerial ownership and audit committee independence promote tax responsibility disclosure. In contrast, family board membership, CEO duality, foreign ownership and family ownership negatively impact tax responsibility disclosure. Additional analyses reveal the specific information categories that produce the overall effects on tax responsibility disclosure and assess the moderating impact of family firms on the governance and CTR disclosure nexus. Practical implications: Corporations can use the results to encourage practices that enhance transparency and improve the quality of disclosures. Regulatory authorities can use the findings to stipulate better protocols. Doing so will be vital for developing countries such as Pakistan to improve tax revenue and cultivate economic growth. Originality/value: While this research represents, to the best of the authors' knowledge, one of the first empirical investigations of the association between corporate governance and CTR, the results contribute to the corporate governance literature and offer fresh insights into CTR, an emerging dimension of corporate social responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to examine the impact of board characteristics on climate change disclosures (CCDs) in the context of an emerging economy, with a unique focus on regulatory influences. Design/methodology/approach: This study analyzes longitudinal data (2014–2021) from environmentally sensitive firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange, using a disclosure index developed within the Global Reporting Initiative framework. The authors use a neo-institutional theoretical lens to explore regulatory influences on CCD through board characteristics. This study uses hand-collected data from annual reports owing to the absence of an established database. Findings: The results indicate that a larger board size, the presence of foreign directors and the existence of an audit committee correlate with higher levels of CCD disclosure. Conversely, a higher frequency of board meetings is associated with lower CCD disclosure levels. This study also observed an increase in CCD following the implementation of corporate governance guidelines by the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission, albeit with a relatively low number of firms making these disclosures. Research limitations/implications: This study contributes to the climate change reporting literature by providing empirical evidence of regulatory influences on CCD through board characteristics in an emerging economy. However, the findings may not be universally applicable, considering the study's focus on Bangladeshi listed firms. Practical implications: This study suggests growing pressures for diverse stakeholders, including researchers and regulatory bodies, to integrate climate change disclosure into routine activities. This study offers a valuable framework and insights for various stakeholders. Social implications: By emphasizing the influence of good governance and sustainability practices, this study contributes to stakeholders' understanding, aiming to contribute to a better world. Originality/value: This study stands out by uniquely positioning itself in the climate change reporting literature, shedding light on regulatory influences on CCD through board characteristics in the context of an emerging economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to examine the impact of board characteristics (BCs) on banks' annual reports readability (BARR). Further, it examines whether bank size (BS) moderates the association between BC and BARR. The study employs a sample of 208 bank-year observations from both listed and non-listed banks in the Egyptian stock exchange (EGX), utilizing data spanning from 2016 to 2023. The study employs a random-effect regression model to test the hypotheses and discuss the results. The results suggest that BARR has a significant association with board meetings, gender and cultural diversity. Furthermore, BS played a moderating role in determining the association between BCs and BARR, supporting the second hypothesis. The findings show that the BCs and disclosure quality differ for banks of varying sizes. The findings have practical implications for the Egyptian banking sector, highlighting that board structure is critical to transparency and maintaining public trust. Additionally, the results focus policymakers' attention on standardizing the contents and structure of banks' annual reports, with the aim of reducing managers' manipulation of disclosures and reducing the level of information asymmetry between stockholders, as suggested by the agency theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This paper examines the interplay between country-level control of corruption (CLCC), female board representation, and corporate sustainability performance using panel data analysis with fixed effect models on a global sample of over 36,000 observations from 2016 to 2021. Our analysis was conducted in four stages: first, assessing the baseline effects of gender diversity on sustainability outcomes within the context of corruption control; second, exploring these effects across groups categorized by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); third, examining differences between developing and developed regions; and finally, analyzing regional variations across America, Europe, and Asia. The results indicate that both control of corruption and increased board diversity have significant positive effects on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores, with a highly significant interaction effect, suggesting a substantial combined influence. Additionally, analyses based on SDG alignment demonstrate that control of corruption improves ESG performance irrespective of SDG level, while board diversity benefits both high and low SDG groups. Regional analyses further reveal varied effects across America, Europe, and Asia. These findings underscore the significance of corruption control and female representation in enhancing corporate sustainability worldwide, emphasizing the potential for firms to improve ESG performance by prioritizing anti-corruption efforts and promoting board diversity. This international study contributes valuable insights into the relationship between country-level governance, corporate board composition, and sustainability outcomes across diverse contexts, highlighting the importance of tailoring sustainability policies and practices based on regional and developmental nuances.

Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the influence of board characteristics on corporate reputation. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 128 Brazilian publicly traded companies from Refinitiv Eikon were analysed between 2016 and 2020. The dependent variable was corporate reputation, whereas the independent variables were board size, gender diversity, board independence and audit committee presence. Multivariate analysis was used. Findings – The results presented empirical evidence that board members can impact corporate reputation. Findings showed that board size, gender diversity and independence positively influence Brazilian companies’ corporate reputation. Conversely, an audit committee had no significant impact on corporate reputation. Research limitations/implications – The paper presents a contribution to the significance of board members in shaping a company's corporate reputation, using the signalling theory and the resource-based view (RBV) theory. Practical implications – Regarding practical implications, this work provides subsidies for managers to value board characteristics because they directly reflect on corporate reputation and competitive advantage, leading to more sustainable performance. Social implications – The research findings highlight that a diverse board encourages the organisation to improve its workforce, human rights, relations with the community and responsibility for manufactured products. Originality/value – The relationship between board characteristics and corporate cooperation is poorly established in the literature. Furthermore, the results prove the RBV theory in an emerging context. Similarly, the signalling theory proved helpful in improving Brazilian firms’ corporate reputation.

Research aims: This study aims to analyze the effect of board characteristics, ownership structures, and investors on disruptive innovation disclosure in the annual reports of companies in Indonesia. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used 237 cross-section data from 237 companies in the manufacturing sectors. The dependent variable in this study was obtained by analyzing the content of the company's annual report. The hypothesis in this study was then tested using multiple linear regression. Research findings: The regression test results revealed that foreign ownership affected the disclosure of disruptive innovation in manufacturing companies. Other variables, such as characteristics of the board of commissioners, members and investors, did not affect the disclosure of disruptive innovation in manufacturing companies. Theoretical contribution/Originality: Disclosure of disruptive innovation is rarely done, but this study looks at disclosure from the stakeholder theory perspective in manufacturing companies. Research limitation/Implication: This study was only limited to manufacturing companies. Meanwhile, other companies are expected to be studied in further research. In addition, more observation data can be added to strengthen the research results.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of board characteristics and company size on tax transparency. Tax transparency means properly measuring, presenting and disclosing the amount of tax in the financial statements. Tax transparency, in addition to the proper fulfillment of the company's social responsibility (from the perspective of identifying and paying tax obligations according to the tax law), will help the investors and tax system policymakers to make appropriate decisions. In this research, tax transparency was measured with five criteria (disclosure of tax status, absence of material distortions in tax reserve, absence of significant ambiguity regarding taxes, absence of material annual adjustments for tax, and speed in determining the final tax filing). Also, the effect of the board characteristics on two levels, including the level of the components of board characteristics (size, independence and financial knowledge of the board, the non-executive chairman and the non-duality of the role of the CEO) and the level of the combined criteria of characteristics, were tested with the correlation research method. Results showed that the combined measure of the characteristics has a direct impact on tax transparency. At the component level, the size and financial knowledge of the board have a direct impact, but independence of the board, non-duality of the CEO's role, and the non-executive chairman do not have a significant impact on tax transparency; Company size also has no significant effect on tax transparency.

In this study, we provide the first attempt to relate economic policy uncertainty (EPU) to firms' access to finance. Using data from 26 countries and the news‐based index from Baker et al. (2016), we provide evidence that EPU significantly increases financial constraints and decreases firms' access to finance. Our main inference is robust to alternative measures of financial constraints, alternative samples, alternative model specifications, and several approaches that control for potential endogeneity. We further show that the EPU‐financial constraint relationship is driven by both the demand and supply sides of financing. Additional analyses suggest that the impact of EPU on firms' financial constraints is moderated by board characteristics (i.e., gender diversity, independence, and duality). They also highlight the moderating roles of government effectiveness, the rule of law and control of corruption. Collectively, our findings provide novel theoretical and practical contributions in relation to EPU and the firms' setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the aftermath of banking failures in Africa, the survival of firms has thus been placed with the application of good corporate governance practice and the oversight role of internal and external auditors. This study examines whether audit quality is related to corporate board of directors and financial reporting timeliness in the context of developing countries. Using sample data from 21 universal banks in Ghana and 31 commercial banks in Kenya for the periods 2010 to 2019. The study employs the Generalized Least Square(GLS), using fixed effect to estimate the relationships. The empirical results document that board size, average 9, and board independence, 59% on average, increase audit quality in Africa. However, the relationship between board gender and audit quality is not significant. Financial report lag is not significant to audit quality in Africa. However, financial report lag in Kenya is negative and significant to quality audit. Our findings recommend that commercial banks in Africa should implement policies that would increase the size of their boards and the number of independent directors to enhance maximum benefits from good corporate governance practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan (JRAK) is the property of Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The existing literature on the impact of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility (CSR) showed inconsistent results and disregarded the possibility of non‐linear patterns in the relationship. The present study examines the non‐linear relationship between ownership structure (family, foreign, institutional, and government) and CSR expenditure of listed non‐financial service sector firms in India. Further, the moderating effect of board variables, including board size, board independence, multiple directorships and gender diversity, is explored in the ownership structure‐CSR nexus. Based on a balanced panel dataset of 243 non‐financial service sector companies listed in India, the study observed an inverse U‐relationship between institutional ownership and CSR. The study also found that family, foreign, and government ownership positively influence the firm's social engagement. However, the study could find partial support for the moderating role of the four board characteristics; board size, board independence, multiple directorships and gender diversity in ownership‐CSR association. The study contributes to existing CSR and corporate governance literature by exploring one of the major factors (ownership structure) impacting CSR and the role of board variables in the association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractThis study investigates the relationship between board characteristics (Sharia boards and boards of directors) and capital structure decisions of Islamic commercial banks (ICBs). The sample consisted of 14 ICBs in Indonesia operated during 2007–2021. The data were analyzed using the random effect model and the feasible generalized least square model. The results reveal that the size and independence of the board of directors and Sharia board expertise have a positive impact on the Indonesian ICBs’ debt-to-total asset ratio decision. Furthermore, board gender diversity encourages ICBs in Indonesia to adopt a lower debt-to-total equity ratio (DTER) while the size and expertise of Sharia boards encourage ICBs to pursue higher DTER. This study reinforces the agency theory’s view regarding the relationship between board characteristics and corporate capital structure decisions.

This study examines the influence of board characteristics on company’s sustainability reporting in the GCC region. In contrast to prior research, we investigate the relationship between variables across a span of eleven years, encompassing all nonfinancial firms listed on the GCC stock exchanges. Our study addresses the scarcity of research undertaken in the GCC region on this particular topic. This study empirically investigates the relationship between board characteristics (specifically, board size, board gender diversity, board meetings, and board independence) on the adoption of sustainable reporting while taking into account firm characteristics (including leverage, profitability, liquidity, and firm size) and controlling for macroeconomic variables (such as GDP and inflation). This research utilized Probit regression to examine the influence of the likelihood of various variables on the adoption of sustainable reporting. The findings indicated that larger board sizes, a higher proportion of female board members, the inclusion of more independent directors, and more frequent board meetings all contribute to the improvement of sustainable reporting. Furthermore, the greater the size, the greater is the impact of profitability and liquidity on the sustainability of reporting. The current research offers some insights into the connection between board characteristics and corporate sustainability reporting for corporate boards, regulators, and practitioners who are interested in promoting sustainable reporting. Further investigation should examine the comparison of sustainability reporting methodologies across different regions, as well as between privately held and publicly listed corporations. Finally, as evident by the results reported in the Maximum Likelihood Estimator our results are robust.

This study investigates the relationship between board characteristics and firm efficiency in emerging Asian economies, using stochastic frontier analysis and a panel dataset of 5829 firm-year observations. The results suggest that companies with strong monitoring boards concerning diversity, size, and independence achieve higher efficiency. This study provides more specific results on the importance of board characteristics for firm-level governance and highlights the Asian emerging markets’ focus on good governance practices. The study’s use of firm efficiency as a proxy for performance is a unique framework that mitigates endogeneity issues common in corporate governance variables. This approach is an improvement over previous research that has relied on financial ratios, which need to consider the value of management’s actions and investment decisions affecting future performance. The results contribute to the literature on corporate governance and provide valuable insights for investors in emerging markets.

This study investigates the impact of board characteristics on the financial performance of 14 listed banks in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. We use 84 firm-year observations of 14 listed banks from three stock markets in East Africa, namely Dar es Salaam Stock Exchange (DSE), Nairobi Security Exchange (NSE), and Uganda Security Exchange (USE) for a six-year period that is 2017–2022. The accounting measure of financial performance was the net interest margin (NIM). This study used a fixed-effects panel analysis model to test the hypotheses. The empirical results reveal that board financial expertise positively and significantly influences financial performance. This implies that an increase in the proportion of board members with financial and accounting backgrounds increases bank performance. On the other hand, the proportion of foreign directors decreased bank performance as the variable exerted a negative and significant effect on bank performance. The results suggest that board structure has an important role to play in the governance of listed banks in East African frontier stock markets.

We explored the relationship between board characteristics and sustainability of higher education institutions in the United Kingdom (UK). We analysed 153 UK universities using data for the year 2019. Our analysis revealed that board size, the number of students on the board, and the number of academic members on the board were found to have significant and positive relationships with sustainability. Also, the composition of the sustainability committee was shown to have a significant and positive impact on sustainability score. However, the relationships between board gender diversity, the number of external members on the board, and the number of board meetings held during the year with sustainability score were not significant. The results provide guidance to universities for developing their sustainability practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increasing shift toward sustainable development and heightened societal scrutiny, companies are placing greater emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. This study investigates the association between ESG disclosures and financial performance among companies listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange, focusing on how board characteristics influence this relationship. By analyzing a sample of Saudi-listed firms, the research assesses the impact of ESG disclosures, as well as their individual environmental, social, and governance components, on key financial performance indicators: Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Earnings Per Share (EPS). The findings reveal a positive association between overall ESG disclosures and financial performance metrics. Environmental disclosures are particularly effective in enhancing ROA, social disclosures positively affect ROE, and governance disclosures significantly improve EPS. Additionally, the study highlights how board characteristics--such as ownership, size, and independence--moderate the relationship between ESG disclosures and financial performance. Specifically, board ownership has a positive moderating effect, while the impacts of board size and independence vary depending on the financial metric in question. These results emphasize the importance of ESG disclosures in influencing financial performance and underscore the significant role of board governance in strengthening this relationship. The study provides valuable insights from the Saudi context, offering both theoretical and practical implications for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers aiming to optimize ESG practices and enhance financial outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to examine the relationship between firm ownership, board characteristics and the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRD) in the annual reportsin a developing country like Vietnam.The data is based on a content analysis of the annual reports oftop 100 (VN100) companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh stock exchange for the year 2021.Hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the corporate social responsibility disclosures index and the independent variables, namely the board independence, board size, managerial ownership, foreign ownership and the presence ofa sustainability committee (or CSR committee) after statistically controlling the effects of company size and the profitability of the companies.Results indicated that board independence, foreign ownership and the presence ofa sustainability committee are positively and significantly correlated with the level of CSRD. Conversely, it is found that managerial ownership has negative significant impacts on the CSRD. The results also displayed no significant relationship between the board size and CSRD.Our study provides several suggestions to promote the CSR information disclosure of listed companiesin countries which share similar corporate ownership and board characteristics. The regulators and policy makers should increase the number of independent board members, maintain the existence of the CSR committee, increase the foreign ownership ratio for transparency of information provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the moderating effect of sustainability reporting on the relationship between the independent variables of board diversity, and earnings management and the dependent variable of readability of financial statements. Design/methodology/approach: The study panel data regression analysis involved 36 Kenyan-listed companies from 2016 to 2020. Findings: Key findings were that increased board diversity was found to significantly improve the readability of financial statements. Discretionary earnings management was found to significantly reduce the readability of financial statements. Sustainability reporting was found to significantly increase the readability of financial statements, and it moderated the relationship between board diversity, earnings management and financial statements readability in Kenya. Research limitations/implications: The study sample of 36 non-financial listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange was very small and was affected by the problem of thin trading; hence, caution should be adopted when interpreting the findings. Practical implications: The Capital Markets Authorities (CMA) as a policymaker should enforce sustainability reporting by Kenyan listed firms as there is evidence that the reporting enhances the readability of financial statements. The Institute of Certified Public Accountants as a policymaker should closely monitor the published financial statements of firms for earnings management and punish the perpetrators, as there is empirical evidence that the practice reduces the readability of financial statements. Social implications: Sustainability reporting is successful as a moderating variable between readability of financial statements and determinants of readability of financial statements. Originality/value: This study contributes to knowledge by studying sustainability reporting as a moderating variable between the independent variables of board diversity and earnings management and the dependent variable of readability of financial statements and measured sustainability reporting using a dummy variable for the period before and after the enactment and release of CMA code of 2016 on corporate governance that required sustainability reporting by Kenyan listed companies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dividend payout is one of financial options that Saccos consider as part of the key performance indicators for Saccos. Deposit taking Saccos in Kenya have faced numerous challenges namely, governance, managerial and operational such that the performance of a number of them continues to be sub optimal according to the report by SASRA. Therefore, this study sought to examine the influence of board characteristics on dividend policy of deposit taking Saccos in Kenya under guidance by agency cost theory. The study utelized causal design and descriptive survey design. The targeted population was 403 stakeholders sampling 201 through stratified simple random sampling. The sacco directors/chairpersons and the CFO/CEOs formed unit of analysis. Closed ended questionnaires were applied for primary data. A list of 20 Saccos in Starehe Sub County, Nairobi County were basis for pilot test to establish reliability and validity of research instruments. Cronbach Alpha was employed to ascertain reliability, whereas content and construct validity were utilized to attain validity. The data underwent analysis through the application of descriptive as well as inferential statistics. The investigation ensured that the assumptions of linear regression were satisfied before conducting numerous linear regressions. Tables were used to present data. The results indicated a positive significant association between board characteristics practices and dividend policy P:0.000<0.05 hence conclusive that deposit-taking Saccos in Kenya focused on board characteristics as envisaged. The study recommended that Sacco's should diverse the board features to ensure they accommodate the dividend policy framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stakeholders heavily rely on companies' environmental, social, and governance (ESG reports) to assess ESG performance and inform investment decisions. Given the significant influence of boards of directors on ESG disclosure, understanding how board characteristics impact this disclosure is crucial. A systematic literature review of 26 articles from 2012 to 2023, explores the relationship between board characteristics (BC) and ESG disclosure, aiming at identifying the academic trend of the relationship. Notably, 35% of the studies adopt a multicountry perspective, considering country-level factors. The results reveal the application of various theories--stakeholder, agency, legitimacy, resource dependency, signaling, and upper echelons--to explain the relationship. Key board characteristics identified include board size, independence, gender diversity, expertise, the presence of board committees. Research methods, particularly content analysis, are prevalent in the studied articles, with a focus on comprehensive ESG indices covering diverse dimensions. This research makes substantial contributions to the expanding ESG literature by offering valuable perspectives on how BC influence on ESG disclosure and suggesting avenues for future research, including industry comparative studies, the development of new theoretical frameworks, exploration of specific board characteristics, reference to national ESG guidelines, in-depth analysis of particular facets of ESG disclosure, and investigation of government mechanisms' role in the relationship between these variables. Furthermore, the most recent sources including papers from the Covid-19 Pandemic period, constitute the novelty of the research and this study offers valuable guidance for scholars seeking to enhance the understanding of BC and ESG disclosure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between board characteristics and micro-level organizational factors is an area that has been significantly under-researched, and there is a lack of understanding of how these two elements interact with each other. Hence, we aim to explore how board characteristics could potentially have an impact on individual-level job satisfaction. The dataset used for this study encompasses a total of 4020 observations gathered from 804 companies listed in the FTSE 350 and S&P 500 indices, and it covers the period spanning from 2016 to 2021. The results of the adopted multiple regression analysis showed significant positive relationships between board gender diversity, diversity of specific skills, board independence, board meeting attendance, board size, and average board tenure and employees' job satisfaction of the companies under analysis. However, cultural diversity was not found to have a significant impact on employees' satisfaction. We draw out the theoretical implications of these findings and provide practical recommendations regarding companies' boards composition and structure that help them to enhance the level of their employees' job satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study develops a recent database of corporate inversions, and we descriptively explore three different corporate inversion timeframes from 1982 to 2022. We examine how the external governance mechanism of the legal environment has impacted the structure, destination countries, industry preference, and firm-level effects of inverting firms over these timeframes. In addition, we highlight the various internal corporate governance mechanisms (board characteristics) and common accounting variables and ratios during these same periods. We find that inverting firms' boards during our later inversion period of 2018–2022 are smaller and less experienced and accounting ratios exhibit riskier profiles than the earlier inversion time periods. Besides building on the inversion literature, our findings should be of interest to practitioners and regulators who are interested in the current trends of inversions and we highlight new industry clustering in the manufacturing and service sectors and new inversions comprise mostly cannabis companies in the wake of conflicting federal, state and securities laws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Green banking is an environmentally responsible practice within the banking business, despite its classification as a non-environmentally sensitive sector. Commercial banks can actively promote green banking initiatives by investing in emission-reducing technologies and providing loans to sectors with minimal greenhouse gas emissions. This article seeks to examine the impact of bank financial performance, board size, board independence, and board diversity on green banking disclosure. This study applied panel data regression to a sample of fortythree banks listed between 2019 and 2022, demonstrating that these banks' financial performance influences the level of transparency in green banking. The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) has a positive impact on green banking disclosure, whereas non-performing loans (NPL) and the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) have a negative impact. The size of board commissioners, board independence, and gender diversity do not correlate with green banking disclosure. The results suggest that banks with strong financial performance, i.e., higher capital and lower nonperforming loans, have more resources to participate in the green banking activities disclosed in the sustainability report. The negative relationship between LDR and green banking disclosure indicates that the careful selection of loan distribution to businesses that care about the environment will increase green banking disclosure but decrease LDR. This study informs the Financial Service Authority (OJK) that, in order to promote sustainable finance in the banking industry, the OJK should oversee banks' financial health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to analyze the influence of board characteristics, ownership structure, and public attention on the disclosure of information related to climate change in the banking industry. This study uses panel data from financial reports and corporate sustainability in the banking sector. The data is processed using the Eviews application, using a sample of 348 companies from 2018 to 2021. The results show that the presence of women on the board, foreign board members, foreign ownership, and public attention all have a positive and significant effect influence. In contrast, board size and institutional ownership have a negative influence on the disclosure of climate change information by banking companies in different countries. Statistical tests also show that although the level of climate change information disclosure by banking companies is relatively good, there is still room for improvement to be in line with evolving standards. The study also looks at public attention through media coverage, as measured through Google Trends, which has the potential to impact climate change information disclosure, especially in sectors that are sensitive to the issue. Furthermore, the study conducted additional tests by categorizing the sample based on companies located in countries with high and medium rankings in the climate change performance index, as well as grouping them by region (Asia, Americas, and Europe). This research has important practical and theoretical contributions, advancing the understanding of the application of legitimacy and stakeholder theories to climate change and the factors that influence climate change disclosure strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper investigates how financial inclusion affects credit risk in the MENA region. It also checks whether board characteristics can moderate this relationship. We use a sample of MENA banks from 2004 to 2017 and perform the system generalized method of moment approach. Through the usage and access dimensions, we find that financial inclusion reduces the level of non-performing loans. These results are robust using an index of financial inclusion. For board characteristics, findings indicate that only board size, duality, and independent directors significantly affect the level of NPLs. Our findings prove that MENA banks benefit from an interaction between greater financial inclusion and board characteristics. These insights are consistent with theorists and scholars who are working on each dimension separately. As an extension of their work, we find that the interaction significantly affects the NPLs ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the impact of corporate governance practices (namely board characteristics, ownership structure, and audit committee characteristics) on corporate tax avoidance. For this purpose, this study uses generalised least squares regression on a sample of 138 companies listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Ten-year data from 2009 to 2018 are collected from published annual reports, comprising 1380 firm-year observations. The findings highlight that board independence, concentrated ownership, and audit committee gender diversity are negatively associated with tax avoidance. Conversely, managerial ownership and audit committee independence positively influence aggressive tax behaviour. Additional analysis reveals that these impacts are nonlinear and change with the different levels of tax avoidance. Enhanced governance stifles tax avoidance at lower levels; however, it encourages tax avoidance when firms are already aggressively avoiding taxes. This scenario represents a 'double down' behaviour depicted by the Pakistani corporate sector. This is one of the foremost studies to explore the impact of corporate governance on tax avoidance in Pakistan. It contributes to the literature by examining the impact of under-researched factors such as board meetings and audit committee characteristics and provides insights into the conflicting findings on board characteristics and ownership structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Digital transformation (DT), board characteristics, and green technology innovation (GI) have a substantial impact on corporate sustainability. However, there are seemingly conflicting conclusions about how DT affects an enterprise's GI performance, and few studies have considered the moderating effect of board characteristics. We aim to explore the impact of board characteristics on the correlation between DT and GI, using a sample of 1470 listed companies in China and employing a fixed‐effects model. Our results suggest that DT significantly enhances enterprises' GI performance; DT indirectly promotes the GI performance of enterprises by increasing their R&D investments, optimizing human capital structure, and enhancing management efficiency. Additionally, board gender diversity, board size, and board educational level positively moderate the relationship between DT on GI, whereas the impact will be blunted by board age diversity. Our conclusions are of great value to promote enterprises' GI performance and realize enterprises' sustainable development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the relationship between perk consumption and forced CEO turnover. The results based on Chinese firms indicate that the likelihood of forced CEO turnover increases with excess perk consumption by executives. The positive effect of excess perk consumption on CEO dismissal declines when the firms are momentum winners in market returns and profitability while it rises when firms are momentum losers. Non-co-opted independent directors amplify the positive effect of excess perks on forced CEO turnover whereas board gender diversity reduces such likelihood. Better educated CEOs appear to consume fewer excess perks, reducing the likelihood of forced turnover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research investigated the influence of board characteristics on corporate social responsibility of listed oil and gas companies in Nigerian Exchange. Variables examined are bord size, independence, gender diversity, activity, professionalism and equity ownership of board members. While corporate social responsibility was proxy by CSR expenditure. The population consists of twelve (12) listed oil and gas firms from which five (5) firms have consistently published their annual reports within the period covered and extracted data from their respective annual reports. Panel corrected standard error was used for analysis. Findings revealed both board size and board activity have no significant impacts on CSR while in contrast, board independence, female gender, board professionalism and board equity ownership have a significant effect on CSR. It was recommended that the management of listed oil and gas companies need to have more independent outside directors on the board to enhance monitoring and CSR performance. Also, higher participation of female on the board will improve CSR performance because of their concern for environmental issues. In addition, having more members with professional expertise will improve the decision making of the board and equally shape CSR performance. Board members with equity stake will align the interest of the managers with those of shareholders and likewise, focus more on long-term goals of the firm. Listed oil and gas firm should maintain appropriate board size and required number of board meetings as stipulated by code of corporate governance.