Search

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: A new tube voltage-switching dual-energy (DE) CT system using a novel deep-learning based reconstruction process has been introduced. Characterizing the performance of this DE approach can help demonstrate its benefits and potential drawbacks. PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical performance of a novel DECT system and compare it to that of standard single-kV CT and a rotate/rotate DECT, for abdominal imaging. METHODS: DE and single-kV images of four different phantoms were acquired on a kV-switching DECT system, and on a rotate/rotate DECT. The dose for the acquisitions of each phantom was set to that selected for the kV-switching DE mode by the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) at manufacturer-recommended settings. The dose that the ATCM would have selected in single-kV mode was also recorded. Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) from 40 to 130 keV, as well as iodine maps, were reconstructed from the DE data. Single-kV images, acquired at 120 kV, were reconstructed using body hybrid iterative reconstruction. All reconstructions were made at 0.5 mm section thickness. Task transfer functions (TTFs) were determined for a Teflon and LDPE rod. Noise magnitude (SD), and noise power spectrum (NPS) were calculated using 240 and 320 mm diameter water phantoms. Iodine quantification accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) relative to water for 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg I/ml were determined using a multi-energy CT (MECT) phantom. Low-contrast visibility was determined and the presence of beam-hardening artifacts and inhomogeneities were evaluated. RESULTS: The TTFs of the kV-switching DE VMIs were higher than that of the single-kV images for Teflon (20% TTF: 6.8 lp/cm at 40 keV, 6.2 lp/cm for single-kV), while for LDPE the DE TTFs at 70 keV and above were equivalent or higher than the single-kV TTF. All TTFs of the kV-switching DECT were higher than for the rotate/rotate DECT. The SD was lowest in the 70 keV VMI (12.0 HU), which was lower than that of single-kV

Contains fulltext : 220826.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical performance of an ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) system. METHODS: The physico-technical capabilities of a novel commercial UHRCT system were assessed and compared with those of a current-generation multi-detector (MDCT) system. The super-high-resolution (SHR) mode of the system uses 0.25 mm (at isocentre) detector elements (dels) in the in-plane and longitudinal directions, while the high-resolution (HR) mode bins two dels in the longitudinal direction. The normal-resolution (NR) mode bins dels 2 x 2, resulting in a del-size equivalent to that of the MDCT system. In general, standard procedures and phantoms were used to perform these assessments. RESULTS: The UHRCT MTF (10% MTF 4.1 lp/mm) is twice as high as that of the MDCT (10% MTF 1.9 lp/mm), which is comparable to the MTF in the NR mode (10% MTF 1.7 lp/mm). The width of the slice sensitivity profile in the SHR mode (FWHM 0.45 mm) is about 60% of that of the MDCT (FWHM 0.77 mm). Uniformity and CT numbers are within the expected range. Noise in the high-resolution modes has a higher magnitude and higher frequency components compared with MDCT. Low-contrast visibility is lower for the NR, HR and SHR modes compared with MDCT, but about a 14%, for NR, and 23%, for HR and SHR, dose increase gives the same results. CONCLUSIONS: HR and SHR mode scanning results in double the spatial resolution, with about a 23% increase in dose required to achieve the same low-contrast detectability. KEY POINTS: * Resolution on UHRCT is up to twice as high as for the tested MDCT. * With abdominal settings, UHRCT needs higher dose for the same low-contrast detectability as MDCT, but dose is still below achievable levels as defined by current diagnostic reference levels. * The UHRCT system used in normal-resolution mode yields comparable resolution and noise characteristics as the MDCT system.