Search

Background: Cancer Registries (CRs) remain the gold standard for providing official epidemiological estimations. However, due to CRs' partial population coverage, hospitalization records might represent a valuable tool to provide additional information on cancer occurrence and expenditures at national/regional level for research purposes. The Epidemiology of Cancer in Italy (EPIKIT) study group has been built up, within the framework of the Civic Observers for Health and Environment: Initiative of Responsibility and Sustainability (COHEIRS) project under the auspices of the Europe for Citizens Program, to assess population health indicators. Objective: To assess the burden of all cancers in Italian children and adults. Methods: We analyzed National Hospitalization Records from 2001 to 2011. Based on social security numbers (anonymously treated), we have excluded from our analyses all re-hospitalizations of the same patients (n = 1,878,109) over the entire 11-year period in order to minimize the overlap between prevalent and incident cancer cases. To be more conservative, only data concerning the last five years (2007-2011) have been taken into account for final analyses. The absolute number of hospitalizations and standardized hospitalization rates (SHR) were computed for each Italian province by sex and age-groups (0-19 and 20-49). Results: The EPIKIT database included a total of 4,113,169 first hospital admissions due to main diagnoses of all tumors. The annual average number of hospital admissions due to cancer in Italy has been computed in 2362 and 43,141 hospitalizations in pediatric patients (0-19 years old) and adults (20-49 years old), respectively. Women accounted for the majority of cancer cases in adults aged 20-49. As expected, the big city of Rome presented the highest average annual number of pediatric cancers (n = 392, SHR = 9.9), followed by Naples (n = 378; SHR = 9.9) and Milan (n = 212; SHR = 7.3). However, when we look at SHR, minor cities (i.e., Imperia, Isernia and others) presented values >10 per 100,000, with only 10 or 20 cases per year. Similar figures are shown also for young adults aged 20-49. Conclusions: In addition to SHR, the absolute number of incident cancer cases represents a crucial piece of information for planning adequate healthcare services and assessing social alarm phenomena. Our findings call for specific risk assessment programs at local level (involving CRs) to search for causal relations with environmental exposures.

Objective: An increase in breast cancer incidence has been documented in Italy and in other countries, and some women decide by themselves to undergo diagnostic examinations outside the official screening campaigns. The aim of this paper was to analyze - in terms of effectiveness, appropriate access, and related costs - the path spontaneously followed by a sample of Italian women for the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Subjects and methods: A total of 143 women who consecutively referred themselves to the breast cancer outpatient facilities at the Sant'Andrea University Hospital in Rome from May to June 2007 were enrolled in the study, gave their consent, and were screened according to their individual risk factors for breast cancer. The entire diagnostic and therapeutic path followed in the previous 2 years by each of them, either at Sant'Andrea or in other medical facilities, was reviewed and evaluated in terms of its operative efficiency and fair economic value. Results: The subjects' mean age was 47.5 years (standard deviation 13.6 years); 55% of the women were <50 years old (28% <40 years), and were thus not included in the official screening campaigns; 97 women (70%) were requesting a routine control; and 49% of them had already undergone four to seven examinations before the enrollment, although no major risk factor was present in 73.5%. After enrollment in the study, nine of the patients had surgical interventions performed on them at Sant'Andrea's, identifying five invasive carcinomas and two ductal in situ carcinomas and two benign lesions. Operative efficiency and fair economic value were found to be optimal only in diagnostic/therapeutic paths followed at Sant'Andrea. Conclusion: The diagnostic path at Sant'Andrea's specialized center for breast cancer diagnosis and therapy is characterized by higher operative efficiency and more sustainable costs than at general hospitals, outpatient facilities run by local health authorities, or private medical centers. This result seems to confirm the present tendency to refer high-risk patients for breast cancer directly to breast units like the one at Sant'Andrea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prospective study designed to measure the accuracy of mammography (MRx), ultrasound (US), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and one of the most recently introduced techniques, vacuum biopsy (VB), in the diagnosis of breast cancer is reported. A sample of 146 breast lesions on 135 patients were examined. The design of the study made it possible to compare MRx, US, FNAC and VB directly, because it excluded several confounding variables. Statistical indicators--sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PPV and NPV), false-negative and false-positive rates (FN and FP), suspicious plus indeterminate rate and likelihood ratios (LR)--were calculated. The NPV of MRx and US were remarkably high (92.4% and 97.9%, respectively), confirming previous reports. The complete sensitivity of FNAC was 80%, while specificity was 99.1% and LR of positive tests 88.8. The combined score of FNAC, US and MRx resulted in a good increase in complete sensitivity (97.1%), when compared with the results of the single diagnostic tests evaluated separately. The absolute sensitivity of VB was 97.1% and specificity was 100%. In conclusion, considered together, MRx, US and FNAC appear to be reliable diagnostic procedures and, when they are all negative, the possibility of a cancer is extremely low, although it cannot be completely ruled out. The VB test had the highest absolute sensitivity among all the methods compared. Therefore, this technique could be considered conclusive in diagnostically doubtful cases, avoiding open surgical biopsy.