Search

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be associated with adverse events necessitating treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU). Data focusing on patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are scarce. We thus conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comprising 79 individuals who had high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after ASCT. The median age was 57 years (range: 20-82 years); 38% of patients were female. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (34%) and plasma cell disorders (28%) were the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Sepsis represented the major cause for ICU admission (68%). Twenty-nine percent of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV), 5% had renal replacement therapy, and 44% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 77.2%, 77.2%, 72.2%, and 60.3%, respectively. Stable disease or disease progression prior to the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.0028) and MV (p < 0.0001) were associated with an impaired survival. A total of 36 patients died during observation. The most frequent causes of death were the underlying malignancy (44%) and sepsis (39%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates a favorable overall outcome for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Thus, this patient group should not be denied admission and treatment on the ICU.

The combination of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and pulmonary-renal syndrome due to ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) poses diagnostic uncertainty and a therapeutic dilemma. According to current limited knowledge of COVID-19, the application of commonly used drugs in AAV, cyclophosphamide (CYC) and rituximab (RTX), must be weighed carefully in active COVID-19 infection. We report a case of a 52-year-old male patient with concurrent severe COVID-19 pneumonia and acute relapse of pulmonary-renal syndrome due to AAV after recent RTX maintenance dose. The patient presented with severe hypoxaemia, complete B-cell depletion and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viraemia. He was successfully treated with therapeutic plasma exchange employing COVID-19 convalescent plasma.

Background Due to acuteness, time constraints, and psychological pressure as well as changing team compositions, professional communication constitutes a key challenge in the treatment of critically ill patients. Objectives The aim of this narrative review is to present the current literature on clinical relevance and current developments of interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication in intensive care and emergency medicine. Results Effective communication is of great importance in intensive care and emergency medicine, both for ensuring high-quality patient care and work satisfaction as well as mental health of the medical practitioners. Most conflicts occur between the medical and nursing staff, with communicative conflicts predominantly being related to discussions about the patient's prognosis and end-of-life decision-making. Structural measures such as regular team meetings and trainings seem suitable to specifically improve communication. However, the topic is commonly inadequately represented in everyday clinical practice as well as in research. Conclusions Even though the importance of interprofessional and interdisciplinary communication for high-quality patient care and workload reduction is increasingly being recognized, its routine application in everyday clinical practice is still scarce, particularly in intensive care and emergency medicine. Due to the specific structure and patient population of these fields of patient care, they can benefit more than other specialties from targeted measures to improve communication.

Background. The transfusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells has become established as a new treatment option in oncology; however, this is regularly associated with immune-mediated side effects, which can also run a severe course and necessitate a specific treatment and intensive medical treatment. Material and methods. A literature review was carried out on CAR T-cell therapy, toxicities and the management of side effects. Results. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) regularly occur shortly after CAR T-cell treatment. The symptoms of CRS can range from mild flu-like symptoms to multiorgan failure. In addition to mild symptoms, such as disorientation and aphasia, ICANS can also lead to convulsive seizures and brain edema. The management of CRS and ICANS is based on the severity according to the grading of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). Tocilizumab and corticosteroids are recommended for CRS and corticosteroids are used for ICANS. In the further course persisting hypogammaglobulinemia and cytopenia are frequent even months after the initial treatment and promote infections even months after CAR T-cell therapy. Discussion. Potentially severe complications regularly occur after CAR T-cell therapy. An interdisciplinary cooperation between intensive care physicians, hematologists, neurologists and specialists in other disciplines is of decisive importance for the optimal care of patients after CAR T-cell therapy.

The success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy with impressive response rates in hematologic malignancies but also promising data in solid tumors came along with the cognition of unexpected, potentially life-threatening immune-mediated toxicities, namely the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity recently referred to as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). These toxicities require urgent diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and targeted modulation of key cytokine pathways represents the mainstay of CRS treatment. However, as the underlying mechanisms of ICANS are not well understood, treatment options remain limited and further investigation is warranted. Importantly, after the recent market approval of 2 CAR-T cell constructs, the application of CAR-T cells will expand to nonacademic centers with limited experience in the management of CAR-T cell-associated toxicities. Here, we review the current evidence of CRS and ICANS pathophysiology, diagnostics, and treatment.

Background With Sepsis-3, the increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) as a clinical score for the identification of patients with sepsis and quickSOFA (qSOFA) for the identification of patients at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit (ICU) were introduced in 2016. However, their validity has been questioned, and their applicability in different settings and subgroups, such as hematological cancer patients, remains unclear. We therefore assessed the validity of SOFA, qSOFA, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria regarding the diagnosis of sepsis and the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort of hematological cancer patients treated on ICU and non-ICU settings. Methods We retrospectively calculated SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA scores in our cohort and applied the definition of sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection as reference. Discriminatory capacity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results Among 450 patients with hematological cancer (median age 58 years, 274 males [61%]), 180 (40%) had sepsis of which 101 (56%) were treated on ICU. For the diagnosis of sepsis, sensitivity was 86%, 64%, and 42% for SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA, respectively. However, the AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicated better discrimination for sepsis than SIRS (SOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.73] p < 0.001; qSOFA, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62-0.71] p < 0.001; SIRS, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.61] p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 40% and 14% in patients with and without sepsis, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding patients with sepsis, mortality was similar in patients with positive and negative SIRS scores (39% vs. 40% (p = 0.899), respectively). For patients with qSOFA >= 2, mortality was 49% compared to 33% for those with qSOFA < 2 (p = 0.056), and for SOFA 56% vs. 11% (p < 0.001), respectively. SOFA allowed significantly better discrimination fo

CAR T-cell treatment has brought a significant benefit for patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma and even long lasting remissions seem to be possible. Despite the good results CAR T-cell treatment is associated with severe and potentially life-threatening adverse effects. Patients regularly develop Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after the transfusion of CAR T-cells. In addition to these immunological reactions patients can develop severe and life-threatening infections and other related adverse effects. Due to the increasing number of patients receiving CAR T-cells and the upcoming clinical trials more and more patients will potentially require intensive care treatment for the adverse effects after CAR T-cell treatment. The management of these patients requires an extensive diagnostic workup and complex treatment. An interdisciplinary team of hematologist, intensivist and others like neurologist and palliative medicine consultants is crucial for the best treatment of these patients. Together with the increasing number of patients this can lead to logistical issues for the intensive care departments of centers offering CAR T-cell therapies.

The ongoing strain on personnel in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic is considerable and poses major emotional and psychological challenges for the personnel. In a team evaluation (physicians and nurses), team-specific stress, possible relief strategies, positive and negative experiences, and wishes for improvement of the situation in an intensive care unit were collected. While both occupational groups perceived equally high emotional stress intensities, nursing additionally perceived high stress intensities in the organizational and physical areas. Thus, the occupational group of nurses proves to be the most stressed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings presented here can be used to derive instructions for future actions.