Search

Background: The first wave of COVID led to an alarmingly high mortality rate among nursing home residents (NHRs). In hospitalised patients, the use of anticoagulants may be associated with a favourable prognosis. However, it is unknown whether the use of antithrombotic medication also protected NHRs from COVID-19-related mortality., Objectives: To investigate the effect of current antithrombotic therapy in NHRs with COVID-19 on 30-day all-cause mortality during the first COVID-19 wave., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study linking electronic health records and pharmacy data in NHRs with COVID-19. A propensity score was used to match NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants to NHRs not using anticoagulant medication. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, which was evaluated using a logistic regression model. In a secondary analysis, multivariable logistic regression was performed in the complete study group to compare NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants and those with current use of antiplatelet therapy to those without such medication., Results: We included 3521 NHRs with COVID-19 based on a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or with a well-defined clinical suspicion of COVID-19. In the matched propensity score analysis, NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants had a significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) compared to NHRs who did not use therapeutic anticoagulants. In the secondary analysis, current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48-0.82) and current use of antiplatelet therapy (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) were both associated with decreased mortality., Conclusions: During the first COVID-19 wave, therapeutic anticoagulation and antiplatelet use were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in NHRs. Whether these potentially protective effects are maintained in vaccinated patients or patients with other COVID-19 variants, remains unknown., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.)

Objectives: Assessing the impact of a virtual antibiotic team (VAT) on appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing behavior of older care physicians, regarding urinary tract (UTI), respiratory tract (RTI), and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCF)., Design: Before-after trial; introduction of a VAT consisting of a clinical microbiologist, older care physician, and a pharmacist., Setting and Participants: Eight LTCFs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Methods: The VAT was introduced on April 1, 2019. Meetings were held via weekly teleconferencing. VAT advised about treatment indication, antibiotic choice, and additional diagnostics. Data were retrospectively extracted from resident files regarding infection episodes for which antibiotics had been prescribed during 12 months before (period I) and 11 months after VAT introduction (period II). Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed using national guidelines and an algorithm developed for antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes. Antibiotic prescription rates per 100 person-years (py) were estimated and compared between periods using incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Proportions of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions were compared between periods using the chi-squared test., Results: A total of 524 infection episodes for which antibiotics were prescribed were identified: 284 in period I and 240 in period II. Antibiotic prescription rates before VAT introduction were 73 per 100 py in period I and decreased to 68 in period II (IRR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1). Of all prescriptions, 23.9% were assessed as appropriate during period I, which increased to 40.4% in period II (P < .001). Appropriate antibiotic use increased after VAT introduction for RTI (12.5% to 48.2%, P < .001) and SSTI (47.5% to 74.3%, P = .02) but remained similar for UTI (23.5% to 28.8%, P = .29)., Conclusions and Implications: After implementation of VAT in LTCFs, appropriate antibiotic use increased significantly overall, and for RTI and SSTI particularly. Improving prescribing behavior regarding UTI might need extra strategies., (Copyright © 2021 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate whether the uptake of (89)Zr-bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors could be visualized and quantified. The correlation between tumor (89)Zr-bevacizumab uptake and tumor response to antitumor therapy with a bevacizumab-based regimen was explored., Methods: Seven NSCLC patients underwent static PET scans at days 4 and 7 after injection of 36.4 ± 0.9 MBq (mean ± SD) (89)Zr-bevacizumab, prior to commencing carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab chemotherapy (CPB). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to CPB followed by bevacizumab maintenance therapy was correlated to tumor tracer uptake, quantified using peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak)., Results: Zr-bevacizumab uptake (SUVpeak) was approximately four times higher in tumor tissues (primary tumor and metastases) than in non-tumor tissues (healthy muscle, lung, and fat) on days 4 and 7. A positive trend but no significant correlation could be found between SUVpeak and OS or PFS., Conclusions: This pilot study shows that (89)Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging in NSCLC is feasible. Further investigation to validate this technique as a predictive biomarker for selecting patients for bevacizumab treatment is warranted.