Search

AIMS: Although metformin is widely used for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), its glucose-lowering mechanisms remains unclear. Using the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2, we tested the hypothesis that postprandial GLP-1-mediated effects contribute to the glucose-lowering potential of metformin in T2D.METHODS: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, 15 individuals with T2D (median HbA1c 50 mmol/mol (6.7%), BMI 30.1 kg/m2, age 71 years) underwent, in randomised order, 14 days of metformin and placebo treatment, respectively. Each treatment period was preceded by 14 days without any glucose-lowering medicine and concluded by two 4-hour mixed meal tests performed in randomised order and separated by >24 hours with either continuous intravenous exendin(9-39)NH2 or saline infusion.RESULTS: Compared to placebo, metformin treatment lowered fasting plasma glucose (mean of differences (MD) 1.4 mmol/l×min (95% CI 0.8-2.0)) as well as postprandial plasma glucose excursions during both saline infusion (MD 186 mmol/l×min (95% CI 64-307)) and exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion (MD 268 mmol/l×min (95% CI 108-427)). The metformin-induced improvement in postprandial glucose tolerance was unaffected by GLP-1R antagonization (MD 82 mmol/l×min (95% CI -6,564-170)). Metformin treatment increased fasting plasma GLP-1 (MD 1.7 pmol/l×min (95% CI 0.39-2.9)) but did not affect postprandial GLP-1 responses (MD 820 pmol/l×min (95% CI -1,750-111)).CONCLUSIONS: Using GLP-1R antagonization, we could not detect GLP-1-mediated postprandial glucose-lowering effect of metformin in individuals with T2D. We show that two weeks of metformin treatment increases fasting plasma GLP-1, which may contribute to metformin's beneficial effect on fasting plasma glucose in T2D.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03246451.

Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis affect individuals of all ages and are often treated by surgical removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy), which is considered a safe, low-risk procedure. Nevertheless, recent findings show that bile and its regulated storage and excretion may have important metabolic effects and that cholecystectomy is associated with several metabolic diseases postoperatively. Bile acids have long been known as emulsifiers essential to the assimilation of lipids and absorption of lipid-soluble vitamins, but more recently, they have also been reported to act as metabolic signaling agents. The nuclear receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and the G protein–coupled membrane receptor, Takeda G protein–coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), are specific to bile acids. Through activation of these receptors, bile acids control numerous metabolic functions. Cholecystectomy affects the storage and excretion of bile acids, which in turn may influence the activation of FXR and TGR5 and their effects on metabolism including processes leading to metabolic conditions such as metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic syndrome. Here, with the aim of elucidating mechanisms behind cholecystectomy-associated dysmetabolism, we review studies potentially linking cholecystectomy and bile acid–mediated metabolic effects and discuss possible pathophysiological mechanisms behind cholecystectomy-associated dysmetabolism., Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis affect individuals of all ages and are often treated by surgical removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy), which is considered a safe, low-risk procedure. Nevertheless, recent findings show that bile and its regulated storage and excretion may have important metabolic effects and that cholecystectomy is associated with several metabolic diseases postoperatively. Bile acids have long been known as emulsifiers essential to the assimilation of lipids and absorption of lipid-soluble vitamins, but more recently, they have also been reported to act as metabolic signaling agents. The nuclear receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and the G protein-coupled membrane receptor, Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), are specific to bile acids. Through activation of these receptors, bile acids control numerous metabolic functions. Cholecystectomy affects the storage and excretion of bile acids, which in turn may influence the activation of FXR and TGR5 and their effects on metabolism including processes leading to metabolic conditions such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic syndrome. Here, with the aim of elucidating mechanisms behind cholecystectomy-associated dysmetabolism, we review studies potentially linking cholecystectomy and bile acid-mediated metabolic effects and discuss possible pathophysiological mechanisms behind cholecystectomy-associated dysmetabolism.

Obesity is becoming more frequent and has several negative health impacts. Recent advances in weight management strategies have primarily resided in pharmaceutical treatments, and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown great potential in terms of body weight reduction in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, the dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist tirzepatide has been developed. Tirzepatide has shown strong effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels in several clinical trials including participants with T2D (SURPASS program). In addition to its lowering effect on HbA1C, tirzepatide leads to substantial reductions in body weight, and a series of clinical trials (SURMOUNT program) have investigated the effects on body weight as the primary outcome. In these two trial programs, tirzepatide in doses of 5 mg to 15 mg administered subcutaneously once weekly resulted in body weight reduction of up to 15% in participants with T2D and up to 21% in participants without T2D, despite comparable baseline bodyweight. Across the two trial programs, adverse effects were mainly gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting) occurring with similar incidences of vomiting and lower incidences of diarrhea and nausea in trial participants with T2D compared to trials participants without T2D. Overall, discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 3– 7% of participants with no major differences between individuals with and without T2D. The higher weight-reducing efficacy of tirzepatide in trial participants without T2D is currently unexplained and may be partly reflected in dissimilarities in frequencies of gastrointestinal adverse events. The weight reducing effects of tirzepatide hold great promise for weight management in obese patients regardless of the presence of T2D., Obesity is becoming more frequent and has several negative health impacts. Recent advances in weight management strategies have primarily resided in pharmaceutical treatments, and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown great potential in terms of body weight reduction in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, the dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist tirzepatide has been developed. Tirzepatide has shown strong effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels in several clinical trials including participants with T2D (SURPASS program). In addition to its lowering effect on HbA1C, tirzepatide leads to substantial reductions in body weight, and a series of clinical trials (SURMOUNT program) have investigated the effects on body weight as the primary outcome. In these two trial programs, tirzepatide in doses of 5 mg to 15 mg administered subcutaneously once weekly resulted in body weight reduction of up to 15% in participants with T2D and up to 21% in participants without T2D, despite comparable baseline bodyweight. Across the two trial programs, adverse effects were mainly gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting) occurring with similar incidences of vomiting and lower incidences of diarrhea and nausea in trial participants with T2D compared to trials participants without T2D. Overall, discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 3–7% of participants with no major differences between individuals with and without T2D. The higher weight-reducing efficacy of tirzepatide in trial participants without T2D is currently unexplained and may be partly reflected in dissimilarities in frequencies of gastrointestinal adverse events. The weight reducing effects of tirzepatide hold great promise for weight management in obese patients regardless of the presence of T2D.

AIM: Bile acid sequestrants are cholesterol-lowering drugs, which also improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. The mechanism behind the glucose-lowering effect is unknown but has been proposed to be mediated by increased glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion. Here, we investigated the glucose-lowering effects of sevelamer including any contribution from GLP-1 in people with type 2 diabetes.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 15 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy underwent two 17-day treatment periods with the bile acid sequestrant sevelamer and placebo, respectively, in a randomized order and with an interposed wash-out period of minimum 6 weeks. On days 15 and 17 of each treatment period, participants underwent experimental days with 4-h liquid meal tests and application of concomitant infusion of exendin(9-39)NH 2 or saline. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity (assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose and lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations. In both treatment periods, exendin(9-39)NH 2 increased postprandial glucose excursions compared with saline but without absolute or relative difference between the two treatment periods. In contrast, exendin(9-39)NH 2 abolished the sevelamer-induced improvement in beta-cell glucose sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The bile acid sequestrant sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose, but using the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH 2 we were not able to detect a GLP-1-mediated glucose-lowering effect of sevelamer in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, the sevelamer-induced improvement of beta-cell sensitivity to glucose was shown to be GLP-1-dependent.

Context: In individuals with hypothyroidism and overweight, levothyroxine substitution therapy is often expected to cause weight loss due to its effect on resting energy expenditure. However, despite levothyroxine-induced enhancement of resting energy expenditure, fat mass loss is rarely seen after levothyroxine substitution therapy. The mechanism behind this conundrum is unknown. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of levothyroxine therapy on hunger sensations and ad libitum food intake in individuals with hypothyroidism. Design and setting: Prospective cohort study of 18 newly diagnosed hypothyroid women (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) >10 mU/L). Participants were investigated at diagnosis, after normalization of TSH (<4.0 mU/L), and after 6 months of successful treatment. Eighteen age and body mass index-matched healthy controls were also included. Intervention: Hypothyroid individuals were treated with levothyroxine according to European Thyroid Association guidelines. Main outcomes: Changes in hunger sensation were assessed using visual analog scales (cm) before and during a standardized mixed meal test, and food intake was measured during a subsequent ad libitum meal (g). Results: After 6 months of levothyroxine therapy, mean resting energy expenditure was increased by 144 kcal/day (10%) (P < 0.001). Weight loss was comprised of 0.8 kg fat-free mass while fat mass remained unchanged. Fasting hunger sensation increased from a mean of 4.5 (s.d. 2.2) cm to 5.5 (s.d. 2.2) cm (P = 0.047). The numerical increase in ad libitum meal intake did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Our data suggest that levothyroxine-induced hunger may be a culprit in the lack of fat mass loss from levothyroxine therapy.

Aims The aim of our meta-analyses was to compare the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on mortality, cardiovascular and renal endpoints for a range of type 2 diabetes (T2D) subgroups defined by their specific cardiovascular risk profile. Methods Meta-analyses comparing drugs within the classes of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors were performed and compared to sulphonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors with available cardiovascular outcome trials. The comparison between the different classes of glucose-lowering drugs included analyses of T2D populations with low risk and high risk for cardiovascular disease including populations with established cardiovascular disease and/or kidney disease. Outcomes included mortality, major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and a composite renal endpoint as applied in the underlying clinical trials. Results SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs showed beneficial effects on mortality and MACE compared to the classes of DPP-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas. SGLT-2 inhibitors were shown to be the most effective treatment in terms of HHF and kidney disease. Metformin was used as background therapy for the vast majority of participants in all included studies. Overall, the absolute effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs on these important outcomes were evident for patients with established or at high risk for cardiovascular disease but limited for the low-risk subgroup. Conclusions The findings from our analyses substantiate the relevance of treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs as an add-on to metformin in patients with T2D and a high risk for cardiovascular disease, and furthermore, support the recommendation for SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment in patients with T2D and heart failure or established kidney disease., Aims: The aim of our meta-analyses was to compare the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on mortality, cardiovascular and renal endpoints for a range of type 2 diabetes (T2D) subgroups defined by their specific cardiovascular risk profile. Methods: Meta-analyses comparing drugs within the classes of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors were performed and compared to sulphonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors with available cardiovascular outcome trials. The comparison between the different classes of glucose-lowering drugs included analyses of T2D populations with low risk and high risk for cardiovascular disease including populations with established cardiovascular disease and/or kidney disease. Outcomes included mortality, major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and a composite renal endpoint as applied in the underlying clinical trials. Results: SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs showed beneficial effects on mortality and MACE compared to the classes of DPP-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas. SGLT-2 inhibitors were shown to be the most effective treatment in terms of HHF and kidney disease. Metformin was used as background therapy for the vast majority of participants in all included studies. Overall, the absolute effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs on these important outcomes were evident for patients with established or at high risk for cardiovascular disease but limited for the low-risk subgroup. Conclusions: The findings from our analyses substantiate the relevance of treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs as an add-on to metformin in patients with T2D and a high risk for cardiovascular disease, and furthermore, support the recommendation for SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment in patients with T2D and heart failure or established kidney disease.

AIM: Liraglutide treatment is associated with gallbladder-related disorders and has been shown to delay postprandial gallbladder refilling. The gut hormones cholecystokinin (CCK), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) and glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), are known to regulate gallbladder motility and may be implicated in gallbladder-related disorders associated with liraglutide treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, 12-week trial, 52 participants [50% male, age 47.6 ± 10.0 years, body mass index 32.6 ± 3.4 kg/m 2 (mean ± standard deviation)] with obesity were randomized 1:1 to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (escalated from 0.6 mg to 3.0 mg once-daily) or placebo. During liquid meal tests performed at baseline, after the first dose and following 12 weeks of treatment, we evaluated postprandial gallbladder dynamics and plasma responses of CCK, FGF19 and GLP-2. RESULTS: Liraglutide reduced postprandial FGF19 after the first dose [area under the curve (AUC) 0-240 min 24.8 vs. 48.0 min × ng/ml, treatment ratio (TR) (95% confidence interval) 0.52 (0.39; 0.69)] and following 12 weeks of treatment [AUC 0-240 min 33.7 vs. 48.5 ng/ml × min, TR 0.69 (0.52; 0.93)]. Liraglutide also reduced postprandial GLP-2 responses (AUC 0-240 min 3650 vs. 4894 min × pmol/L, TR 0.75 (0.62; 0.90)] following the first dose as well as after 12 weeks [AUC 0-240 min 3760 vs. 4882 min × pmol/L, TR 0.77 (0.60; 0.99)]. Liraglutide increased postprandial responses of CCK after the first dose [AUC 0-240 min 762 vs. 670 min × pmol/L; TR 1.14 (0.97; 1.33)] and following 12 weeks of treatment [AUC 0-240 min 873 vs. 628 min × pmol/L; TR 1.39 (1.12; 1.73)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, treatment with liraglutide decreased postprandial FGF19 and GLP-2 concentrations and increased postprandial CCK concentrations, which may explain the delayed postprandial gallbladder refilling observed in individuals with obesity treated with liraglutide.

Tirzepatide is a combined glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist. This review will summarize the pharmacological aspects of tirzepatide with a focus on the clinical efficacy and safety reported in the trial programs underlying the regulatory approval for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity in the U.S. and Europe. In a range of trials, tirzepatide has been compared to placebo, insulin and GLP-1 mono-receptor agonists. The trials have included participants with T2D (SURPASS) and obesity (SURMOUNT-1) and have examined tirzepatide in doses ranging from 5 to 15 mg administered once weekly. In the SURPASS trials, tirzepatide led to dose-dependent clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c of up to 20-28 mmol/mol. A head-to-head trial comparing tirzepatide (5-15 mg once weekly) to the GLP-1 mono-receptor agonist semaglutide (1 mg once weekly) demonstrated all doses of tirzepatide to be superior with respect to HbA1c reduction. In terms of body weight, tirzepatide 5-15 mg caused reductions from baseline of up to 13% in patients with T2D in the SURPASS trials and up to 21% in nondiabetic participants in the SURMOUNT-1 trial. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms with nausea as the most frequently observed adverse event in up to 33% of tirzepatide (15 mg)-treated patients. These gastrointestinal symptoms were dose-dependent and often self-limiting with a lower occurrence compared to GLP-1 mono-receptor agonists at conditions with similar efficacy (i.e., with similar HbA1c and body weight reduction). Adverse events resulted in trial drop-out rates from 3-11% of all patients treated with tirzepatide. The potential superior efficacy of tirzepatide compared to GLP- 1 mono-receptor agonists is hypothesized to be a result of the unique dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism. At present, there is no data to support long-term efficacy and safety of tirzepatide. Ongoing trials reporting, Tirzepatide is a combined glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist. This review will summarize the pharmacological aspects of tirzepatide with a focus on the clinical efficacy and safety reported in the trial programs underlying the regulatory approval for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity in the U.S. and Europe. In a range of trials, tirzepatide has been compared to placebo, insulin and GLP-1 mono-receptor agonists. The trials have included participants with T2D (SURPASS) and obesity (SURMOUNT-1) and have examined tirzepatide in doses ranging from 5 to 15 mg administered once weekly. In the SURPASS trials, tirzepatide led to dose-dependent clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c of up to 20-28 mmol/mol. A head-to-head trial comparing tirzepatide (5-15 mg once weekly) to the GLP-1 mono-receptor agonist semaglutide (1 mg once weekly) demonstrated all doses of tirzepatide to be superior with respect to HbA1c reduction. In terms of body weight, tirzepatide 5-15 mg caused reductions from baseline of up to 13% in patients with T2D in the SURPASS trials and up to 21% in nondiabetic participants in the SURMOUNT-1 trial. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms with nausea as the most frequently observed adverse event in up to 33% of tirzepatide (15 mg)-treated patients. These gastrointestinal symptoms were dose-dependent and often self-limiting with a lower occurrence compared to GLP-1 mono-receptor agonists at conditions with similar efficacy (i.e., with similar HbA1c and body weight reduction). Adverse events resulted in trial drop-out rates from 3-11% of all patients treated with tirzepatide. The potential superior efficacy of tirzepatide compared to GLP- 1 mono-receptor agonists is hypothesized to be a result of the unique dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism. At present, there is no data to support long-term efficacy and safety of tirzepatide. Ongoing trials report

Background: Bile acid diarrhoea is an underdiagnosed disease estimated to affect 1-2% of the general population. Case reports indicate that the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide might be an effective treatment for bile acid diarrhoea. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea.Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator, double-dummy, non-inferiority clinical trial at the Center for Clinical Metabolic Research at Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark. Patients aged 18-75 years with 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT)-verified moderate-to-severe primary bile acid diarrhoea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive liraglutide (one daily subcutaneous injection uptitrated from 0·6-1·8 mg per day over 3 weeks) or colesevelam (three capsules of 625 mg twice daily), the standard of care, for 6 weeks following one run-in week with no treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing a reduction in daily stool frequency of 25% or greater after 6 weeks. Data from all participants were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. The non-inferiority limit was set to 15% in favour of colesevelam. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2018-003575-34) and is completed.Findings: Between April 1, 2019, and Jan 31, 2021, 52 patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to liraglutide and 26 to colesevelam. 20 (77%) of 26 participants on liraglutide and 13 (50%) of 26 on colesevelam experienced a 25% or greater reduction in stool frequency, corresponding to a significant risk difference of -27% in favour of liraglutide (one-sided 95% CI -100 to -6). Liraglutide was therefore superior to colesevelam in reducing daily stool frequency. Mild nausea with a duration of 10-21 days was reported by six participants in the liraglutide group and by one participant in the colesevelam gr

Background and aims: Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is a debilitating disease characterized by loose stools and high stool frequency. The pathophysiology of BAM is not wellunderstood. We investigated postprandial enterohepatic and gluco-metabolic physiology, as well as gut microbiome composition and fecal bile acid content in patients with BAM. Methods: Twelve participants with selenium-75 homocholic acid taurine test–verified BAM and 12 healthy controls, individually matched on sex, age, and body mass index, were included. Each participant underwent 2 mixed meal tests (with and without administration of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam) with blood sampling and evaluation of gallbladder motility; bile acid content and microbiota composition were evaluated in fecal specimens. Results: Patients with BAM were characterized by increased bile acid synthesis as assessed by circulating 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, fecal bile acid content, and postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon. The McAuley index of insulin sensitivity was lower in patients with BAM than that in healthy controls. In patients with BAM, colesevelam co-administered with the meal reduced postprandial concentrations of bile acids and fibroblast growth factor 19 and increased 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one concentrations but did not affect postprandial glucagon-like peptide 1 responses or other gluco-metabolic parameters. Patients with BAM were characterized by a gut microbiome with low relative abundance of bifidobacteria and high relative abundance of Blautia, Streptococcus, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Akkermansia muciniphila. Conclusion: Patients with BAM are characterized by an overproduction of bile acids, greater fecal bile acid content, and a gluco-metabolic profile indicative of a dysmetabolic prediabetic-like state, with changes in their gut microbiome composition potentially linking their enterohepatic

Introduction Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is a socially debilitating disease characterised by high stool frequency and urgency caused by a spillover of bile acids into the colon. Bile acid sequestrants (BASs) have limited therapeutic effect but represent the only available treatment option. Cases reporting total remission of BAM-related symptoms after treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, prompted us to design a clinical trial investigating the therapeutic effect of this compound in patients with BAM. Methods and analysis Fifty adult individuals with moderate or severe BAM as assessed by the 75 selenium-homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT) will, after a run-in period of 10 days with no BAM treatment, be randomised to either treatment with the BAS colesevelam or liraglutide (double blinded) for 6 weeks. Daily symptom diaries and questionnaires will be filled in. Blood and faecal samples will be collected and SeHCAT will be performed at baseline, after week 3 and at end of trial. The primary endpoint is change in daily stool frequency. Secondary endpoints include changes from baseline in questionnaires, biochemistry, SeHCAT and faecal bile acid content and microbial composition. Ethics and dissemination The study complies with Danish and European Union legislation and is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The study is monitored by the Capital Region of Denmark's good clinical practice unit. All results, positive, negative and inconclusive, will be disseminated at national and/or international scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Trial registration number EudraCA: 2018-003575-34; Pre-results.