Search

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant stress on health resources in Australia. The Heart Rhythm Council of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand aims to provide a framework for efficient resource utilisation balanced with competing risks when appropriately treating patients with cardiac arrhythmias. This document provides practical recommendations for the electrophysiology (EP) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) services in Australia. The document will be updated regularly as new evidence and knowledge is gained with time.

Pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon ablation is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. We sought to compare outcomes with the first and second generation cryoballoon, with the second generation balloon incorporating the Achieve Lasso catheter, in terms of freedom from symptomatic recurrence and major complications.The first 200 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation with the first generation balloon were compared with the first 200 patients using the second-generation balloon. All patients had symptomatic atrial fibrillation and had failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from symptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure using the cryoballoon. The primary safety endpoint was major procedural complications.At 12 months, freedom from symptomatic AF after a single procedure in the first generation cohort was 64.3% compared with 78.6% in the second-generation cohort (p = 0.002). At 24 months, freedom from symptomatic AF in the first generation cohort was 51.3% compared with 72.6% in the second-generation cohort (p 0.001). Procedural time (150 min vs 101 min; p 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (32.5 min vs 21.4 min; p 0.001) was lower in the second-generation group. The rate of major complications was comparably low in both groups.The second-generation cryoballoon was associated with improved freedom from symptomatic AF with reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy time, with a similar low rate of major complications.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel form of ablation using electrical fields to ablate cardiac tissue. There are only limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of this type of ablation in humans. Methods: PULSED AF (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT04198701) is a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter, global, premarket clinical study. The first-in-human pilot phase evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using a novel PFA system delivering bipolar, biphasic electrical fields through a circular multielectrode array catheter (PulseSelect; Medtronic, Inc). Thirty-eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were treated in 6 centers in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands. The primary outcomes were ability to achieve acute pulmonary vein isolation intraprocedurally and safety at 30 days. Results: Acute electrical isolation was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins (n=152) in the 38 patients. Skin-to-skin procedure time was 160±91 minutes, left atrial dwell time was 82±35 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 28±9 minutes. No serious adverse events related to the PFA system occurred in the 30-day follow-up including phrenic nerve injury, esophageal injury, stroke, or death. Conclusions: In this first-in-human clinical study, 100% pulmonary vein isolation was achieved using only PFA with no PFA system–related serious adverse events. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide. Direct current cardioversion is commonly used to restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Chest pressure may improve cardioversion success through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of routine chest pressure with direct current cardioversion for AF.Methods and analysisMulticentre, double blind (patient and outcome assessment), randomised clinical trial based in New South Wales, Australia. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to control and interventional arms. The control group will receive four sequential biphasic shocks of 150 J, 200 J, 360 J and 360 J with chest pressure on the last shock, until cardioversion success. The intervention group will receive the same shocks with chest pressure from the first defibrillation. Pads will be placed in an anteroposterior position. Success of cardioversion will be defined as sinus rhythm at 1 min after shock. The primary outcome will be total energy provided. Secondary outcomes will be success of first shock to achieve cardioversion, transthoracic impedance and sinus rhythm at post cardioversion ECG.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been confirmed at all participating sites via the Research Ethics Governance Information System. The trial has been registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001028998). De-identified patient level data will be available to reputable researchers who provide sound analysis proposals.

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are being increasingly utilised for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter. AIMS To analyse the adoption and application of these drugs in a regional hospital inpatient cohort and compare with national prescribing data. METHODS Digital medical records identified prescribed anticoagulants for patients admitted with AF and atrial flutter during 2013-2014. Analysis of patient demographics and stroke risk identified trends in prescribing DOAC versus warfarin. For broader comparison, data from the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme were sourced to determine the nation-wide adoption of DOAC. RESULT Of the 615 patients identified, 505 (255 in 2013, 250 in 2014) had sufficient records to include in the study. From 2013 to 2014, DOAC prescriptions increased from 9 to 28% (P

We report the case of a 69-year-old man who presented with worsening exertional angina where subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in a coronary arteriovenous fistula. Attempts to occlude the fistula using a relatively conservative management approach with acute reversal of intraprocedural heparin and prolonged balloon inflation unfortunately resulted in extensive coronary artery thrombosis without immediate resolution of the arteriovenous fistula. However, follow-up at 6 months revealed resolution of the fistula. This case study emphasizes the uncommon but potentially life-threatening complications of percutaneous coronary interventions with implications not only relating to the hazards of managing iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula, but reversing intraprocedural heparin using protamine, during any coronary angiogram.

© 2014 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) a Inc. All rights reserved. *Corresponding author at: Cardiovascular Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, N Email: Nicholas.Collins@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)(Fig. 1a and1b), with the stent position confirmed on 2D and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (Fig. 1c and 1d). Percutaneous device retrieval was planned, with stent position confirmed on fluoroscopy (Fig. 2a). A 6 JR4 guide was positioned into the RVOT with a loop snare capturing the embolised stent (Fig. 2b).