Search

ObjectiveAdiposity has been hypothesized to interfere with the activity of bevacizumab (BEV), an anti-angiogenic agent. Measurements of adiposity, BMI, surface fat area (SFA), and visceral fat area (VFA) were investigated as prognostic of oncologic outcomes among patients treated with chemotherapy, with or without BEV, on GOG 218, a prospective phase III trial.MethodPretreatment computed tomography (CT) for 1538 GOG 218 participants were analyzed. Proportional hazards models assessed association between adiposity and overall survival (OS) adjusted for other prognostic factors. The predictive value of adiposity as a function of BEV treatment was assessed in 1019 patients randomized to either chemotherapy (CT) + placebo (P) → P or CT + BEV → BEV.ResultsAfter adjusting for prognostic factors, SFA was not associated with the overall hazard of death (p = 0.981). There was a non-significant 0.1% (p = 0.062) increase in hazard of death associated with a unit increase in VFA. When comparing the treatment HRs for patients who did and did not receive BEV, there was no association with SFA (p = 0.890) or VFA (p = 0.106). A non-significant 0.8% increase in the hazard of death with unit increase in BMI (p = 0.086) was observed. BMI values were not predictive of a longer survival for patients with BEV vs placebo (p = 0.606).ConclusionMeasures of adiposity strongly correlated to one another but were not predictive of efficacy for BEV. VFA is a weak prognostic factor.

Background: Primary mucinous adenocarcinomas of the ovary are uncommon, and their biological behavior is uncertain. Retrospective studies have suggested that many mucinous carcinomas initially diagnosed as primary to the ovary have in fact metastasized from another site. A prospective randomized trial provided an opportunity to estimate the frequency of mucinous tumors, diagnostic reproducibility, and clinical outcomes.Methods: A phase 3 trial enrolled 4000 women with stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma, treated by surgical staging and debulking, with randomization to one of five chemotherapeutic arms. Slides and pathology reports classified as primary mucinous carcinoma were reviewed independently by three pathologists. Cases were reclassified as primary or metastatic to the ovary according to two methods. Overall survival (OS) of reclassified groups was compared within the groups and with that of patients with serous carcinomas.Results: Forty-four cases were classified as mucinous adenocarcinoma upon review. Using either method, only about one third were interpreted by the three reviewers as primary mucinous carcinomas. Reproducibility of interpretations among the reviewers was high, with unanimity of opinion in 30 (68%) cases. The median survival (MS) did not differ significantly between the groups interpreted as primary or metastatic, but the OS was significantly less than that for women with serous carcinoma (14 vs 42 months, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Advanced stage mucinous carcinoma of the ovary is very rare and is associated with poor OS. Many mucinous adenocarcinomas that are diagnosed as primary ovarian neoplasms appear to be metastatic to the ovary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Our purpose was to document the tibiofemoral (TF) compression forces produced during clinical initial graft tension protocols.Methods: An image analysis system was used to track the position of the tibia relative to the femur in 11 cadaveric knees. TF compression forces were quantified by use of thin-film pressure sensors. Before anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions were performed with patellar tendon grafts, measurements of TF compression force were obtained from the ACL-intact knee with knee flexion. ACL reconstructions were then performed by use of "force-based" and "laxity-based" graft tension approaches. Within each approach, high- and low-tension conditions were compared with the ACL-intact condition over the range of knee flexion angles.Results: The TF compression forces for all initial graft tension conditions were significantly greater than those of the normal knee when the knee was in full extension (0 degrees ). The TF compression forces produced with the laxity-based approach were greater than those produced with the force-based approach. However, the laxity-based approach was necessary to restore normal laxity at the time of surgery.Conclusions: The results of this study show that initial graft tension conditions influence TF compressive forces at the time of surgery and that clinically relevant initial graft tension conditions produce different TF compressive forces.Clinical Relevance: This study showed that the TF compression forces were greater in the ACL-reconstructed knee for all of the initial graft tension conditions when compared with the ACL-intact knee and that clinically relevant initial graft tension conditions produce different TF compressive forces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of cediranib, olaparib, and cediranib/olaparib compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC)., Patients and Methods: NRG-GY005 is an open-label, four-arm, phase II/III superiority trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid PROC and one to three previous therapies. Key exclusion criteria included previous receipt of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor or receipt of antiangiogenic therapy in the recurrent setting. Treatment arms (SOC [once weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin], cediranib, olaparib, or cediranib/olaparib) were equally randomized. A preplanned interim futility analysis on the basis of progression-free survival (PFS) selected treatment arms to advance to phase III. PFS and overall survival (OS) were phase III coprimary end points, with hierarchical testing of PFS followed by OS to preserve type 1 error control, designed to have 90% power for a 0.625 PFS hazard ratio (HR). OS was tested after PFS in the multiple hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and patient-reported outcomes., Results: Five hundred sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled for phase II/III. Three arms met PFS criteria to carry forward to phase III (SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib). Median PFS was 3.4, 5.2, and 4 months with SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 42.2 months. PFS HR estimates for cediranib/olaparib and cediranib ( v SOC) were 0.796 (98.3% CI, 0.597 to 1.060) and 0.972 (98.3% CI, 0.726 to 1.300), respectively. Median OS was 13.6, 12.8, and 10.5 months, and of 443 patients with measurable disease, ORR was 8.6%, 24.7%, and 13.1% for SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In patients receiving cediranib/olaparib, no statistically significant difference was observed on the NFOSI-DRS-P subscale compared with SOC (98.3% CI, -1.3 to 1.5, P = .8725)., Conclusion: The cediranib-containing arms demonstrated clinical activity on the basis of PFS but were not superior compared with SOC.

Background: The bag-valve-mask (BVM) or manual resuscitator bag is used as a first-line technique to ventilate patients with respiratory failure. Volume-restricted manual resuscitator bags (eg, pediatric bags) have been suggested to minimize overventilation and associated complications. There are studies that both support and caution against the use of a pediatric resuscitator bag to ventilate an adult patient. In this study, we evaluated the ability of pre-hospital clinicians to adequately ventilate an adult manikin with both an adult- and pediatric-size manual resuscitator bag without the assistance of an advanced airway or airway adjunct device., Methods: This study was conducted at an international conference in 2022. Conference attendees with pre-hospital health care experience were recruited to ventilate an adult manikin using a BVM for 1 min with both an adult and pediatric resuscitator bag, without the use of adjunct airway devices, while 6 ventilatory variables were collected or calculated: tidal volume (V T ), breathing frequency, adequate breaths (V T > 150 mL), proportion of adequate breaths, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), and estimated alveolar ventilation (EAV)., Results: A total of 208 participants completed the study. Ventilation with the adult-sized BVM delivered an average V T of 290.4 mL compared to 197.1 mL ( P < .001) when using the pediatric BVM. PIP with the adult BVM was higher than with the pediatric BVM (10.6 cm H 2 O vs 8.6 cm H 2 O, P < .001). The median EAV with the adult bag (1,138.1 [interquartile range [IQR] 194.0-2,869.9] mL/min) was markedly greater than with the pediatric BVM (67.7 [IQR 0-467.3] mL/min, P < .001)., Conclusions: Both pediatric- and adult-sized BVM provided lower ventilation volumes than those recommended by professional guidelines for an adult. Ventilation with the pediatric BVM was significantly worse than with the adult bag when ventilating a simulated adult subject., Competing Interests: Dr Slutsky discloses a relationship with SafeBVM Corporation. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Objective: Manual ventilation is a basic skill that every emergency medical services (EMS) responder is expected to perform proficiently. Improper manual ventilation may result in significant morbidity; however, there is no feedback mechanism or method of control for the volume, pressure, or frequency during manual ventilation. In this study, we aimed to quantify the volume and peak pressures of manually delivered breaths using a simulated lung., Methods: One hundred ninety-nine volunteer EMS responders from the EMS World Expo 2019 and EMS Today 2020 participated in this study. Each volunteer manually ventilated a simulated lung using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) for 18 breaths. Descriptive statistics were computed for peak pressures (P peak ) and tidal volumes (V T) ), and a multivariable linear regression was conducted to determine whether there was an independent correlation between P peak or V T and seven different variables., Results: Both P peak and V T delivered by EMS responders had a high level of variability; 82.9% of clinicians delivered at least one breath exceeding the recommended safety thresholds; and 98.0% delivered at least one breath that was inadequate or excessive. Our results showed no likely clinical significant role of sex, hand size, frequency of use, or years of experience in determining P peak and V T . Tidal volumes were significantly higher in males ( p  < 0.001), those using two-hand manual ventilation ( p  < 0.001), shorter hand length ( p  = 0.013), higher confidence ( p  < 0.001), and more years of experience ( p  < 0.001). Peak pressures were significantly higher in those using two-hand manual ventilation ( p  < 0.001), wider hand width ( p  = 0.004), higher confidence ( p  < 0.001), less frequent use of the BVM per month ( p  < 0.001), more experience ( p  < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated large variability of V T and P peak within and, to a lesser degree, between clinicians. Of the seven variables that might have affected tidal volume or peak pressures, only the use of two hands versus one hand had a potentially clinically significant effect. Our study identifies a clear need for BVM improvement to ensure every practitioner can deliver breaths at appropriate volumes and safe pressures.

Purpose: To compare taxane maintenance chemotherapy, paclitaxel (P) and paclitaxel poliglumex (PP), with surveillance (S) in women with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube (O/PC/FT) cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane therapy., Methods: Women diagnosed with O/PC/FT cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to S or maintenance, P 135 mg/m 2 once every 28 days for 12 cycles, or PP at the same dose and schedule. Overall survival (OS) was the primary efficacy end point., Results: Between March 2005 and January 2014, 1,157 individuals were enrolled. Grade 2 or worse GI adverse events were more frequent among those treated with taxane (PP: 20%, P: 27% v S: 11%). Grade 2 or worse neurologic adverse events occurred more often with taxane treatment (PP: 46%, P: 36% v S: 14%). At the fourth scheduled interim analysis, both taxane regimens passed the OS futility boundary and the Data Monitoring Committee approved an early release of results. With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 653 deaths were reported; none were attributed to the study treatment. Median survival durations were 58.3, 56.8, and 60.0 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Relative to S, the hazard of death for P was 1.091 (95% CI, 0.911 to 1.31; P = .343) and for PP, it was 1.033 (95% CI, 0.862 to 1.24; P = .725). The median times to first progression or death (PFS) were 13.4, 18.9, and 16.3 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Hazard ratio = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.684 to 0.938; P = .006 for P and hazard ratio = 0.854; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.00; P = .055 for PP., Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with P and PP did not improve OS among patients with newly diagnosed O/tubal/peritoneal cancer, but may modestly increase PFS. GI and neurologic toxicities were more frequent in the taxane treatment arms.

Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, but complications from repeated platinum therapy occur. We assessed the activity of two all-oral nonplatinum alternatives, olaparib or olaparib/cediranib, versus platinum-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: NRG-GY004 is an open-label, randomized, phase III trial conducted in the United States and Canada. Eligible patients had high-grade serous or endometrioid platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to platinum-based chemotherapy, olaparib, or olaparib/cediranib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included activity within germline BRCA -mutated or wild-type subgroups and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Results: Between February 04, 2016, and November 13, 2017, 565 eligible patients were randomly assigned. Median PFS was 10.3 (95% CI, 8.7 to 11.2), 8.2 (95% CI, 6.6 to 8.7), and 10.4 (95% CI, 8.5 to 12.5) months with chemotherapy, olaparib, and olaparib/cediranib, respectively. Olaparib/cediranib did not improve PFS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.10; P = .077). In women with germline BRCA mutation, the PFS HR versus chemotherapy was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.94) for olaparib/cediranib and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.37 to 1.07) for olaparib. In women without a germline BRCA mutation, the PFS HR versus chemotherapy was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.30) for olaparib/cediranib and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.86) for olaparib. Hematologic adverse events occurred more commonly with chemotherapy; however, nonhematologic adverse events were higher with olaparib/cediranib. In 489 patients evaluable for PROs, patients receiving olaparib/cediranib scored on average 1.1 points worse on the NFOSI-DRS-P subscale (97.5% CI, -2.0 to -0.2, P = .0063) versus chemotherapy; no difference between olaparib and chemotherapy was observed., Conclusion: Combination olaparib/cediranib did not improve PFS compared with chemotherapy and resulted in reduced PROs. Notably, in patients with a germline BRCA mutation, both olaparib and olaparib/cediranib had significant clinical activity., Competing Interests: Joyce F. LiuConsulting or Advisory Role: Tesaro, Mersana, Clovis Oncology, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Boston Biomedical (Inst), Acetylon Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Agenus (Inst), CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Surface Oncology (Inst), 2X Oncology (Inst), Vigeo Therapeutics (Inst), Aravive (Inst), Arch Oncology (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MerckUncompensated Relationships: Merck Mark F. BradyConsulting or Advisory Role: Cel-Sci Ursula A. MatulonisHonoraria: Advaxis, Alkermes, SymphogenConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Novartis, NextCure, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Trillium Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, AgenusResearch Funding: Merck, Novartis, Tesaro, Syndax, Immunogen, Mersana, Leap Therapeutics, Fujifilm, SQZ BiotechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Austin MillerConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/Merck, Regeneron (Inst)Uncompensated Relationships: Genetect Elizabeth M. SwisherLeadership: IDEAYA Biosciences David CellaStock and Other Ownership Interests: FACIT.orgConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Asahi Kasei, Ipsen, Mei PharmaResearch Funding: Novartis (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), PledPharma (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst) Noelle G. ClovenConsulting or Advisory Role: Toray Industries Carolyn Y. MullerResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Genmab (Inst), VBL Therapeutics (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), TapImmune Inc (Inst), Linnaeus Therapeutics (Inst), agenus (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Merck (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Have a pending patent on the cancer use for R-ketorolac - not yet its own new drug (Inst)Other Relationship: NCI, NCI, Department of Defense Richard G. MooreHonoraria: Fujirebio DiagnosticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Abcodia, Fujirebio DiagnosticsResearch Funding: Angle Steven E. WaggonerConsulting or Advisory Role: Regeneron Melissa A. GellerResearch Funding: Tesaro, Genentech, FATE Therapeutics, Morphotek, Bayer Keiichi FujiwaraHonoraria: Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Takeda, Genmab, NanoCarrierResearch Funding: Eisai (Inst), Kaken Pharmaceutical (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Immunogen (Inst), Oncotherapeutics (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Zeria Pharmaceutical (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), MSD (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Merck KGaA (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Genmab (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Angeles Alvarez SecordHonoraria: Myriad GeneticsResearch Funding: Tesaro (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Merck (Inst), PharmaMar (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Immutep (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), VBL Therapeutics (Inst), OncoQuest Pharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: GlaxoSmithKlineUncompensated Relationships: Roche/Genentech, VBL Therapeutics, GOG Foundation, OncoQuest Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Aravive Katherine M. MoxleyConsulting or Advisory Role: Tessa Therapeutics (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline Michael A. BookmanEmployment: The Permanente Medical GroupConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Immunogen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, AraviveNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Age and ethnicity are among several factors that influence overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer. The study objective was to determine whether ethnicity and age were of prognostic significance in women enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to front-line therapy., Methods: Women with advanced stage ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. All women had surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy with one of three regimens. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between OS with age and race/ethnicity among the study participants., Results: One-thousand-eight-hundred-seventy-three women were enrolled in the study. There were 280 minority women and 328 women over the age of 70. Women age 70 and older had a 34% increase risk for death when compared to women under 60 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.16-1.54). Non-Hispanic Black women had a 54% decreased risk of death with the addition of maintenance bevacizumab (HR = 0.46, 95% CI:0.26-0.83). Women of Asian descent had more hematologic grade 3 or greater adverse events and a 27% decrease risk of death when compared to non-Hispanic Whites (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90)., Conclusions: Non-Hispanic Black women showed a decreased risk of death with the addition of bevacizumab and patients of Asian ancestry had a lower death rate than all other minority groups, but despite these clinically meaningful improvements there was no statistically significant difference in OS among the groups., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Increasing measures of adiposity have been correlated with poor oncologic outcomes and a lack of response to anti-angiogenic therapies. Limited data exists on the impact of subcutaneous fat density (SFD) and visceral fat density (VFD) on oncologic outcomes. This ancillary analysis of GOG-218, evaluates whether imaging markers of adiposity were predictive biomarkers for bevacizumab (bev) use in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)., Patients and Methods: There were 1249 patients (67%) from GOG-218 with imaging measurements. SFD and VFD were calculated utilizing Hounsfield units (HU). Proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between SFD and VFD with overall survival (OS)., Results: Increased SFD and VFD showed an increased HR for death (HR per 1-SD increase 1.12, 95% CI:1.05-1.19 p = 0.0009 and 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20 p = 0.0006 respectively). In the predictive analysis for response to bev, high VFD showed an increased hazard for death in the placebo group (HR per 1-SD increase 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.37; p = 0.025). However, in the bev group there was no effect seen (HR per 1-SD increase: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.14) Median OS was 45 vs 47 months in the VFD low groups and 36 vs 42 months in the VFD high groups on placebo versus bev, respectively., Conclusion: High VFD and SFD have a negative prognostic impact on patients with EOC. High VFD appears to be a predictive marker of bev response and patients with high VFD may be more likely to benefit from initial treatment with bev., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Megan Buechel: No conflicts of interest. Danielle Enserro: No conflicts of interest. Robert A. Burger: Served as a consultant for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Tesaro, Clovis Oncology, Genentech, Immunogen, Agenus, Gradalis, Janssen Research & Development, Merck, and VBL Therapeutics. Mark F. Brady: No conflicts of interest. Katrina Wade: No conflicts of interest. Angeles Alvarez Secord: Recieved clinical trial grant funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas Pharma Inc., Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Eisai, Endocyte, Exelixis, Immutep Ltd., Incyte, Merck, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Tesaro/GSK, and VBL Therapeutics; honoraria for Advisory Boards from Aravive, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Cordgenics, Eisai, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Mersana, Oncoquest, Roche/Genentech, and Tesaro/GSK; participated on Steering Committees for OVAL and AtTend clinical trials (uncompensated); and is a member of GOG Foundation Board of Directors within the past 36 months. Andrew B. Nixon: Receives industry funding from Genentech, MedImmune/AstraZeneca, Medpacto, Seattle Genetics, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Tracon Pharmaceuticals, Eureka Therapeutics, Leadiant Biosciences, Acceleron Pharma, OncoMed Pharmaceuticals.Does consulting for GSK, Promega, Kanghong Pharma, Eli Lilly. Travel with Powering Precision Health. Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei: No conflicts of interest. H. Liu: No conflicts of interest. Bin Zheng: No conflicts of interest. Heidi Gray: No conflicts of interest. Krishnansu S. Tewari: Consultant and Speaker's Bureau with Genentech/Roche, Abbvie, Essai, GSK/Tesaro, Merck, Clovis, Astra Zeneca. David M. O'Malley: Reports personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from AstraZeneca, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Clovis, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Tesaro, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Immunogen, personal fees from Ambry, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Janssen/J&J, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Abbvie, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Regeneron, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Amgen, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Novocure, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Genentech/Roche, institutional support for clinical research from VentiRx, institutional support for clinical research from Array Biopharma, institutional support for clinical research from EMD Serono, institutional support for clinical research from Ergomed, institutional support for clinical research from Ajinomoto Inc., institutional support for clinical research from Ludwig Cancer Research, institutional support or clinical research from Stemcentrx, Inc., institutional support for clinical research from CERULEAN PHARMA, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from GOG Foundation, institutional support for clinical research from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, institutional support for clinical research from Serono Inc., institutional support for clinical research from TRACON Pharmaceuticals, institutional support for clinical research from Yale University, institutional support for clinical researchfrom New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance, institutional support for clinical researchfrom INC Research, Inc., institutional support for clinical researchfrom inVentiv Health Clinical, institutional support for clinical researchfrom Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., institutional support for clinical research from PRA Intl, personal fees from Myriad Genetics, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Eisai, personal fees and institiional support from Agenus, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from GSK, personal fees from Tarveda, personal fees and institutional support for clinical research from Merck. Robert S. Mannel: Has received honorarium from Tesaro for an Advisory Board. Michael J. Birrer: No conflicts of interest. Kathleen N. Moore: Advisory board participation for Abbvie, Aravive, Astra Zeneca, Clovis, Eisai, Genentech/Roche, GSK/Tesaro, Immunogen, Merck, Mersana, Tarveda, VBL Therapeutics, Vavotar. Her institution receives research funding from PTC Therapeutics, Merck, Genentech/Roche., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: There are limited non-invasive methods to assess lower extremity arterial injuries in the emergency department (ED) and pre-hospital setting. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) requires careful auscultation by Doppler, an approach made difficult in noisy environments. We sought to determine the agreement of the ABI measured using the pulse oximeter plethysmograph waveform (Pleth) with auscultation by Doppler in a controlled setting. A secondary outcome sought to examine the agreement of ABI by automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer (AOS) with Doppler., Methods: We measured blood pressure in the right upper and lower extremities of healthy volunteers using: (1) Doppler and manual sphygmomanometer; (2) Pleth and manual sphygmomanometer; and (3) AOS. The Bland-Altman approach to assessing agreement between methods was used comparing mean differences between ABI pairs to their means for Doppler versus Pleth and Doppler versus AOS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects models examined intra- and inter-rater reliability., Results: Among 100 participants with normal ABI the mean ABI (95%CI) were Doppler 1.11 (0.90-1.33), Pleth 1.10 (0.91-1.30), and AOS 1.10 (0.90-1.30). The ABI difference (95% CI for limits of agreement) were 0.01 (-0.20,0.18) for Doppler-Pleth and 0.02 (-0.26, 0.22) for Doppler-AOS. The ICC for the Doppler-Pleth comparison (ICC = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.63) was greater than for the Doppler-AOS (ICC = 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.43)., Conclusions: The ABI measured using the Pleth has a high level of agreement with measurement by Doppler. The AOS and Doppler have good agreement with greater measurement variability. Pleth and AOS may be reasonable alternatives to Doppler for ABI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no financial interests or other competing or conflicting interests to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether instituting an alternative to opioids (ALTO) protocol significantly reduced opioid use in emergency departments (EDs). The secondary objective was to determine whether patient-reported pain and satisfaction were affected., Methods: Electronic health records for 10 EDs in Colorado were retrospectively examined for the 6 months before the intervention and for the same 6 months the following year after the intervention, which consisted of systemic and educational initiatives in line with the Colorado American College of Emergency Physicians 2017 Opioid Prescribing and Treatment Guidelines ., Results: Of the total preintervention and postintervention unique patient visits, 47.2% received 1 of the drugs of interest, an opioid or ALTO, while in the ED. In aggregate, the EDs decreased opioid usage, measured in morphine equivalent units per 1000 ED visits, by 37.4% (95% confidence interval, 33.6%-76.2%; P < 0.0001) after the intervention. Statistically significant decreases were seen in every type of opioid. Statistically significant increases in ALTO usage were also noted across all study hospitals. There were no significant changes observed in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction scores before and after the intervention in the hospitals with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data (preintervention mean, 3.74; postintervention mean, 3.74; P = 0.637), and there was a small but statistically significant improvement in pain scores (preintervention mean, 3.62; postintervention mean, 3.66; P = 0.002). In a subgroup analysis of patients presenting with chief complaints of long bone fractures and malignant neoplasms, there were no significant reductions in opioid use., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing ALTO protocols to reduce opioid use in the ED setting without an overall reduction in patient perception of pain or satisfaction with care., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Study Objective: This study evaluated the association of race and socioeconomic status with the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Memphis, TN and compared it to 25 years prior., Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest events in the Memphis area from 2012-2018. The primary outcome of interest was the provision of bystander CPR. Socioeconomic status was estimated using the Economic Hardship Index model. A generalized linear mixed model analysis was conducted., Results: The overall rate of bystander CPR was 33.6%. White patients were more likely to receive bystander CPR compared to black patients (44.0% vs 29.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40-2.05). Patients in areas of increased economic hardship were less likely to receive bystander CPR (OR = 0.713, 95% CI = 0.569-0.894). Overall bystander CPR rate increased by 18.7% over the past 25 years., Conclusion: Despite significant increases in bystander CPR compared to 25 years ago, black individuals are still less likely to receive bystander CPR than white individuals in Memphis. Both race and socioeconomic status were independent predictors of the rate of bystander CPR. By using neighborhood demographics and the Economic Hardship Index, communities with low overall bystander CPR rates, such as Memphis, can focus limited resources on areas of greatest need and potential effectiveness., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Background: Data are limited regarding the use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, such as veliparib, in combination with chemotherapy followed by maintenance as initial treatment in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma., Methods: In an international, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy of veliparib added to first-line induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel and continued as maintenance monotherapy in patients with previously untreated stage III or IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive chemotherapy plus placebo followed by placebo maintenance (control), chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by placebo maintenance (veliparib combination only), or chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by veliparib maintenance (veliparib throughout). Cytoreductive surgery could be performed before initiation or after 3 cycles of trial treatment. Combination chemotherapy was 6 cycles, and maintenance therapy was 30 additional cycles. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the veliparib-throughout group as compared with the control group, analyzed sequentially in the BRCA -mutation cohort, the cohort with homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD) (which included the BRCA -mutation cohort), and the intention-to-treat population., Results: A total of 1140 patients underwent randomization. In the BRCA -mutation cohort, the median progression-free survival was 34.7 months in the veliparib-throughout group and 22.0 months in the control group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.68; P<0.001); in the HRD cohort, it was 31.9 months and 20.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95 CI, 0.43 to 0.76; P<0.001); and in the intention-to-treat population, it was 23.5 months and 17.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83; P<0.001). Veliparib led to a higher incidence of anemia and thrombocytopenia when combined with chemotherapy as well as of nausea and fatigue overall., Conclusions: Across all trial populations, a regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and veliparib induction therapy followed by veliparib maintenance therapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than carboplatin plus paclitaxel induction therapy alone. The independent value of adding veliparib during induction therapy without veliparib maintenance was less clear. (Funded by AbbVie; VELIA/GOG-3005 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02470585.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Secondary surgical cytoreduction in women with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube ("ovarian") cancer is widely practiced but has not been evaluated in phase 3 investigation., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one previous therapy, had an interval during which no platinum-based chemotherapy was used (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, and had investigator-determined resectable disease (to no macroscopic residual disease) to undergo secondary surgical cytoreduction and then receive platinum-based chemotherapy or to receive platinum-based chemotherapy alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin or gemcitabine-carboplatin) and use of bevacizumab were at the discretion of the investigator. The primary end point was overall survival., Results: A total of 485 patients underwent randomization, 240 to secondary cytoreduction before chemotherapy and 245 to chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up was 48.1 months. Complete gross resection was achieved in 67% of the patients assigned to surgery who underwent the procedure. Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance was administered to 84% of the patients overall and was equally distributed between the two groups. The hazard ratio for death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.72; P = 0.08), which corresponded to a median overall survival of 50.6 months and 64.7 months, respectively. Adjustment for platinum-free interval and chemotherapy choice did not alter the effect. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.01; median progression-free survival, 18.9 months and 16.2 months, respectively). Surgical morbidity at 30 days was 9%; 1 patient (0.4%) died from postoperative complications. Patient-reported quality of life decreased significantly after surgery but did not differ significantly between the two groups after recovery., Conclusions: In this trial involving patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary surgical cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy did not result in longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; GOG-0213 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00565851.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: We report the final, protocol-specified analysis of overall survival (OS) in GOG-0218, a phase III, randomized trial of bevacizumab in women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma., Methods: A total of 1,873 women with incompletely resected stage III to IV disease were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration v time curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, cycles 2 to 6) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent and maintenance bevacizumab (cycles 2 to 22). Inclusion criteria included a Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and no history of clinically significant vascular events or evidence of intestinal obstruction. OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1,195 serum and/or tumor specimens were sequenced for BRCA1/2 and damaging mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Intratumoral microvessel density was studied using CD31 immunohistochemistry., Results: Median follow-up was 102.9 months. Relative to control (n = 625), for patients receiving bevacizumab-concurrent (n = 625), the hazard ratio (HR) of death was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.20); for bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance (n = 623), the HR was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09). Disease-specific survival was not improved in any arm. No survival advantage was observed after censoring patients who received bevacizumab at crossover or as second line. Median OS for stage IV bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance was 42.8 v 32.6 months for stage IV control (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95). Relative to wild type, the HR for death for BRCA1/2 mutated carcinomas was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73), and for non- BRCA1/2 HRR, the HR was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85). BRCA1/2 , HRR, and CD31 were not predictive of bevacizumab activity., Conclusion: No survival differences were observed for patients who received bevacizumab compared with chemotherapy alone. Testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency is essential.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of two different intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy regimens on progression-free survival (PFS) among women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian carcinoma., Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to six cycles of IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 once per week with intravenous (IV) carboplatin area under the curve 6 (IV carboplatin) versus IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 once per week with IP carboplatin area under the curve 6 (IP carboplatin) versus once every 3 weeks IV paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 over 3 hours day 1, IP cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 day 2, and IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 day 8 (IP cisplatin). All participants received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks in cycles 2 to 22., Results: A total of 1,560 participants were enrolled and had 84.8 months of follow-up. The median PFS duration was 24.9 months in the IV carboplatin arm, 27.4 months in the IP carboplatin arm, and 26.2 months in the IP cisplatin arm. For the subgroup of 1,380 patients with stage II/III and residual disease of 1 cm or less, median PFS was 26.9 (IV-carboplatin), 28.7 (IP-carboplatin), and 27.8 months (IP cisplatin), respectively. Median PFS for patients with stage II/III and no residual disease was 35.9, 38.8, and 35.5 months, respectively. Median overall survival for all enrolled was 75.5, 78.9, and 72.9 months, respectively, and median overall survival for stage II/III with no gross residual disease was 98.8 months, 104.8 months, and not reached. Mean patient-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy neurotoxicity scores (Gynecologic Oncology Group) were similar for all arms, but the mean Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovary scores during chemotherapy were statistically worse in the IP cisplatin arm., Conclusion: Compared with the IV carboplatin reference arm, the duration of PFS was not significantly increased with either IP regimen when combined with bevacizumab and was better tolerated than IP cisplatin.