Search

Design space exploration and margin analysis can inform critical decisions early in engineering design, helping to handle the uncertainties of early design while ensuring design performance. In practice, the complexity of many products makes such decision-making challenging. This paper addresses the challenge with a new design framework that relies on the margin value method to evaluate sets of concepts that are combinatorially generated from an enhanced function-means tree. The basis for concept comparison is the margin value in each design alternative. The margin value method is expanded to address a broad class of design problems by using surrogate models and novel metrics for evaluating different conceptual alternatives. Visualization tools are introduced to support the evaluations. The efficacy of the framework is demonstrated using the design of a structural aero-engine component involving simulation models and uncertain load specifications. Overall, this paper shows how design concepts can be compared objectively and distilled to a set of alternatives that would retain their values throughout product development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Margins are defined as the difference between a design parameter’s minimum required value to ensure functionality, and its actual capability. Margins allow engineers to mitigate uncertainties of various kinds. While some margins are intentionally allocated, some others may get included inadvertently in designs or arise from changes to requirements. Although common in use, the concept of margins has not been formalised systematically. This paper offers the first systematic literature review of margins. Concepts related to margins can be found in various interrelated domains with similar underlying principles. However, these concepts have developed in isolation, leading to a divergent and fragmented understanding. This paper brings these strands together by differentiating between margins which may be deliberately added or discovered during a typical product lifecycle and relates this to various domains such as safety, manufacturing etc. The paper discusses approaches to model, size and allocate margins. The thematic analysis presents insights into the importance of systematic use and management of margins and also raises currently observable gaps in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]