Search

Background: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is one option among other surgical treatments in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The cause of concern regarding VLNT harvested from the groin has been the potential development of secondary lower-extremity lymphedema. This study explored the risks associated with donor-site morbidity following groin VLNT, with or without concomitant breast reconstruction., Method: The cohort comprised data from the Lymfactin® Phase I and II trials, conducted from 2016 to 2019, that used perioperative reverse lymphatic mapping. The volume of the lower extremities was measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, and the adverse events were documented during study visits., Results: Altogether, 51 women with a mean age of 55.5 years were recruited. The mean duration of BCRL was 31.8 months. Among these, 25 (49%) underwent VLNT (VLNT-group) and 26 (51%) underwent VLNT in combination with breast reconstruction (VLNT-BR group). The groups were similar in terms of age, (p = 0.766), BMI (p = 0.316), and duration of BCRL (p = 0.994). Across a period of one year, the volume difference between the lower extremities changed by 22.6 ml (range: -813 to 860.2 ml) (p = 0.067). None of the patients had lower-extremity volume difference exceeding 10% at the 12-month follow-up visit. The most frequent adverse events were postoperative pain (17.7%), wound healing issues (11.8%), and seroma formation (11.8%). Most adverse events (64.6%) were classified as minor., Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrated that groin VLNT with reverse lymphatic mapping appears safe and does not increase the risk of secondary donor-site lymphedema within one year postoperatively., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Studies have shown a significant reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) rates in patients undergoing complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) combined with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) using lymphovenous bypass (LVB).The purpose of this study was to determine if ILR with LVB at the time of cALND results in a decreased incidence of BCRL and its impact on patient quality of life (QOL)., Methods:  In this prospective cohort study, patients ≥ 18 years requiring cALND underwent ILR from 2019 to 2021. The primary outcome was bilateral upper limb volumes measured by Brørson's truncated cone formula and the Pero-System (3D Körper Scanner). The secondary outcome was QOL measured by the Lymphedema Quality of Life (LYMQOL) arm patient-reported outcome measurement., Results:  Forty-two patients consented to ILR using LVB. ILR was completed in 41 patients with a mean of 1.9 ± 0.9 lymphovenous anastomosis performed. Mean age of patients was 52.4 ± 10.5 years with a mean body mass index of 27.5 ± 4.9 kg/m 2 . All patients ( n  = 39, 100%) received adjuvant therapy after ILR. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 5.1 months. Five patients met criteria for lymphedema throughout the duration of the study (12.8%), with two patients having resolution, with an overall incidence of 7.7% by the end of the study period. Patients with lymphedema were found to have statistically significant lower total LYMQOL values at 18 months (8.44 ± 1.17 vs. 3.23 ± 0.56, p  < 0.001). A mean increase of 0.73 ± 3.5 points was observed for overall QOL average for upper limb function at 18 months compared with 3 months ( t  = 0.823, p  = 0.425)., Conclusion:  This study showed an incidence of 7.7% lymphedema development throughout the duration of study. We also showed that ILR has the potential to reduce the significant long-term adverse outcomes of lymphedema and improve QOL for patients undergoing cALND., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lymphedema is a common breast cancer side effect, with an average incidence of 30%. The gold standard conservative treatment for lymphedema is complex decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, skin care, and exercise. Lymphovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a microsurgical technique that intends to redirect excess lymphatic fluid to the venous circulation; this procedure is usually performed when conservative treatment fails. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LVA and CDT for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and Results: The search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and LILACS. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: women with BCRL; (2) intervention: treated with LVA and CDT; and (3) outcome: primary outcome was lymphedema reduction. Secondary outcome was quality of life. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. The search found 3872 articles, with 5 articles meeting the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) criteria, 4 pre-post studies, and one observational cohort study. The total sample included 2763 patients. Follow-up was variable. The follow-up varies from 7.8 to 120 months, with an average of 35 months. Lymphedema reduction was obtained in the five studies. Conclusion: The present systematic review suggests that for patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer, the combination of both treatments is effective in reducing the size of the limb and improving quality of life. Low-quality evidence was found for both limb circumference reduction and quality of life. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias and improve the quality of evidence, in order to better inform clinical practice and enhance the care and well-being of patients with BCRL.

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have significantly improved survival rates. Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common mid-and long-term complication after breast cancer surgery, which seriously affects the quality of life. Breast reconstruction can not only restore the shape of the breasts after mastectomy, but also reduce the occurrence of lymphedema to some extent. Immediate autologous breast reconstruction combined with lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA) or vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) can effectively prevent lymphedema. Delayed breast reconstruction combined with LVA or VLNT can achieve the dual benefits of restoring the appearance and treating lymphedema at the same time. The autologous tissue flap can function as a bridge to promote lymphatic drainage, thus enhancing the treatment of lymphedema. The advances mentioned above in surgical techniques have provided a basis for decision making in breast reconstruction and the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema, and have also brought hope for improving the quality of life of patients.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is recognized as a surgical approach used to reduce the risk of developing secondary lymphedema, and evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ILR is favorable. Our Lymphatic Center has become a centralized location offering ILR for the risk-reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in New England. Over the course of our experience, we made several modifications and adapted our approach to enhance the operative success of this procedure. These include advancements in our use of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging to identify baseline lymphatic anatomical variation, utilization of fluorescein isothiocyanate for lymphatic vessel visualization, application of the lymphosome concept to guide arm injection sites, verification of anastomotic patency (using ICG), localization of reconstruction to guide radiation therapy, incorporation of intraoperative tools to facilitate better anatomic visualization of the axilla, and addition of a lower extremity vein graft to mitigate venous-related complications. Collecting information from each surgery in a standardized manner, including intraoperative lymphatic channel measurements, and deploying clips for possible future radiation exposure, enables future studies on ILR patient outcomes. In this contribution, we aimed to share our institutional modifications with the surgical community to facilitate further adoption, conversation, and advancement of ILR for the risk-reduction in BCRL., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We describe the feasibility and short-term outcome of our surgical technique to repair the lymph vessel disruption directly after axillary lymph node dissection during breast cancer surgery. This procedure is called immediate lymphatic reconstruction to prevent breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL), which frequently occurs after axillary lymph node dissection. The surgical technique consisted of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) or lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. We named the procedure lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS)., Methods: This study used a retrospective cohort design of patients with breast cancer between May 2020 and February 2023. LBS was performed by making an intima-to-intima coaptation between afferent lymph vessels and the recipient's veins (LVA) or efferent lymph vessels lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis., Results: A total of 82 patients underwent lymphatic bypass. The mean age of patients was 50 ± 12 years, and most had stage III breast cancer (n = 59 [72%]). LVA was the most common type of lymphatic bypass (94.6%). The median number of LVA was 1 (range, 1-4) and 1 (range, 1-3) for lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. The median follow-up time was 12.5 months (range, 1-33 months). The 50 patients who had postoperative indocyanine green lymphography described arm dermal backflow stage 0 in 20 (40%), stage 1 in 19 (38%), stage 2 in 2 (4%), and stage 3 in 9 (18%) cases. The proportion of BCRL was 11 (22%), and subclinical lymphedema was 19 (38%) in this period. Most cases were in stable subclinical lymphedema (10, 58.8%). The 1-year and 2-year BCRL rates were 14% (95% confidence interval, 4%-23.9%) and 22% (95% confidence interval, 10.1%-33.9%), respectively., Conclusions: Along with the emerging immediate lymphatic reconstruction, LBS is a feasible supermicrosurgery technique that may have a potential role in BCRL prevention. A randomized controlled study would confirm the effectiveness of the technique., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is a potential sequela of high-risk breast cancer treatment. Preventive treatment with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has emerged as the standard of care; however, there is relatively little known about factors that may contribute to procedural failure., Methods: A retrospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved study followed patients who underwent ILR at the time of ALND at our tertiary care center between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients who presented for at least one follow-up visit in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic met the criteria for inclusion. Patients who developed lymphedema despite ILR and potential contributing factors were further explored., Results: 349 patients underwent ILR at our institution between May 2018 and May 2023. 341 of these patients have presented for follow-up in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic. 32 (9.4%) patients developed lymphedema despite ILR. This cohort was significantly more likely to be obese (56% vs 35%, P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrates increased odds of procedural failure in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio 2.6 [1.2-5.5], P = 0.01)., Conclusion: These data comment upon our institutions outcomes following ILR. Patients who develop lymphedema despite ILR tend to have a higher BMI, with a significantly increased risk in patients with a BMI of 30 or greater. Consideration of these data is critical for preprocedural counseling and may support a BMI cutoff when considering candidacy for ILR going forward, as well as when optimizing failures for secondary lymphedema procedures., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB)., Methods:  This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the "standard" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively., Results:  Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via "CAB" and 39 lymphatics via "standard" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, p  = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, p  < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, p  = 0.0170)., Conclusion:  The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a cyclical, progressive disease that begins at the time of axillary dissection and worsens in the setting of adjuvant oncologic therapies. The paradigm of lymphedema management in these patients is shifting from therapeutic surgeries and decongestive therapy to preventative surgery with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR)., Methods:  After institutional review board approval, a prospective database was maintained of all patients undergoing ILR. Patients were excluded if they had preoperative lymphedema or expired during the study period. All ILR were performed by the senior author. A control group was established with standardized physician delivered phone surveys of patients who had axillary dissection for breast cancer (same oncologic surgeon cohort) prior to the implementation of ILR at the same institution. The study and control groups were matched based on history of adjuvant radiation and body mass index., Results:  A cohort of patients between 2016 and 2019 with 2 years of follow-up after undergoing ILR (77 patients) were matched with those who did not undergo lymphatic reconstruction (94 patients). The incidence of lymphedema in the study group undergoing ILR was 10% ( N  = 8). In comparison, the incidence in the cohort who did not undergo lymphatic reconstruction was 38% ( N  = 36; p  < 0.01). Patients with ILR had 92% lower odds of developing lymphedema ( p  < 0.01)., Conclusion:  ILR can significantly reduce the risk of developing BRCL in high-risk patients at 2 years of follow-up. Patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy are more likely to develop BCRL after ILR compared with those who do not. Ongoing studies include investigation aimed at identifying patients most at risk for the development of BRCL to help target intervention as well as elucidate factors that contribute to the success of ILR., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) entails the autologous relocation of lymph nodes to a lymphedematous region of the body, whereas lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) creates a direct bypass between the lymphatic and venous system. Both techniques are meant to lastingly bolster the local lymphatic drainage capacity. This study compared safety and effectiveness of VLNT and LVA in patients with chronic breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our encrypted database composed of patients with chronic BCRL who were treated with either VLNT or LVA and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient-specific variables analyzed included pre- and postoperative arm circumferences, lymphedema stages and postoperative complications., Results: A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 96 patients demonstrated a complete follow-up period of two years. The VLNT group displayed larger preoperative circumferential measurements, evident in both in the isolated examination of the affected arm, as well as when adjusted for the contralateral unaffected arm. Significant reduction in arm volume was achieved by both groups. However, VLNT demonstrated superior relative reduction rates than LVA, neutralizing any significant arm size disparities after 24 months. Surgery duration was slightly longer for VLNT than LVA. Postoperative complications, predominantly minor, were exclusively observed in the VLNT group., Conclusions: Both VLNT and LVA offer significant improvement for patients suffering from chronic BCRL. VLNT shows an even greater potential for improvement in more severe cases of BCRL, but involves a higher risk for (mostly minor) complications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: As an increased number of women beat breast cancer worldwide, the breast cancer related lymphedema has gained more attention recently. The vascularized omentum lymph node transfer has been approached as an useful tool for advanced and recurrent cases. The purpose of the paper is to emphasize the advantages and disadvantages of this method. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study consists of 17 patients known with breast cancer related lymphedema who received vascularized omentum lymph node transfer. Data was recorded between January 2022 and January 2023. Patients diagnosed with secondary lymphedema stage II or III, unresponsive to previous microsurgical lymphovenous bypass were included. Results: The most prevalent affected site was the left upper limb (59%), where edema was mainly identified in the forearm (75%). Nevertheless, more than half of the subjects have previously received lymphaticovenous anastomosis. The correlation between the stage of lymphedema and the postoperative reduction of the volume of the affected limb was -0.26, the slope to reached -0.33, with an intercept value of 2.64. The follow-up period showed reduced upper limb volume and an improved quality of life. Conclusion: Through an experienced hand, this versatile flap brings hope to breast cancer survivors with lymphedema., (Celsius.)

Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition with a detrimental impact on psychosocial and physical well-being. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis has shown promising results in alleviating physical symptoms and increasing quality of life in patients with BCRL. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect on health related quality of life (HrQol) after LVA surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with BCRL. The study is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult women with unilateral BCRL, with early stage lymphedema and viable lymphatic vessels were included. The primary outcome measure was HrQol measured by the lymphedema functioning disability and health (Lymph-ICF) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were volume difference measured by the water displacement method; the Upper Extremity Lymphedema (UEL) index; and daily use of the compression garments after 3 and 6 months. For this interim analysis 46 patients per group were included. There was a significant improvement in the domains in physical and mental function in the Lymph-ICF questionnaire in the LVA group after 6 months, (- 16.46 ± 18.5, p < 0.05, - 10.12 ± 29.5, p < 0.05 respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in the total score of the Lymph-ICF after 6 months in both groups (LVA-group; - 8.57 ± 22.6, p > 0.05, CDT-group; - 2.65 ± 18.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant volume reduction in both groups (LVA-group: 20.04 ± 196.40, p = 0.497, CDT: 33.98 ± 189.87, p = 0.236). In the LVA group, 41% partially of completely stopped wearing the compression garments after six months whereas in the CDT group 0% discontinued to use of compression garments. LVA resulted in improvement of the domains physical and mental function of the Lymph-ICF. Limb volume did not significantly improve after 6 months. However, around 42% could completely or partially stopped with the use of compression garments in the LVA group. The current results are promising, however longer follow up is required to assess long term effect of LVA for secondary lymphedema. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02790021 registered on 03/06/2016., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This single-centre retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the superiority of treatment by comparing the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy and conservative treatment centred on compression therapy in the early stage of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Data were collected from all patients treated for breast cancer-related lymphoedema between January 2015 and December 2022. The patients were classified into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. The upper extremity lymphoedema index value was calculated, based on five circumference values of the upper extremity and body mass index, to compare the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month outcomes between the groups. Of 101 patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema, 81 (conservative treatment: 52; surgical treatment: 29) were included in the analysis. The therapeutic effect was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group, when comparing the rate of change in oedema at 6 (-6.6% ± 7.3% vs. 0.9% ± 7.5%; p < 0.001), 12 (-7.3% ± 6.2% vs. 2.9% ± 8.6%; p < 0.001), 18 (-7.6% ± 8.0% vs. 3.9% ± 9.2%; p < 0.001) and 24 (-5.6% ± 6.0% vs. 4.4% ± 10.7%; p < 0.001) months. The incidence of cellulitis increased in the conservative treatment group (from 9.6% to 15.4%), whereas it was suppressed in the surgical treatment group (from 13.8% to 0%). Conservative treatment centred on compression therapy increased oedema over time; however, lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy effectively reduced oedema., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Up to one in three patients may go on to develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) after treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has been shown in early studies to reduce the risk of BCRL, but long-term outcomes are limited because of its recent introduction and institutions' differing eligibility requirements. This study evaluated the incidence of BCRL in a cohort that underwent ILR over the long term., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients referred for ILR at the authors' institution from September of 2016 through September of 2020 was performed. Patients with preoperative measurements, a minimum of 6 months of follow-up data, and at least one completed lymphovenous bypass were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, cancer treatment data, intraoperative management, and lymphedema incidence., Results: A total of 186 patients with unilateral node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary nodal surgery and an attempt at ILR over the study period. Ninety patients underwent successful ILR and met all eligibility criteria, with a mean patient age of 54 ± 12.1 years and median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m 2 [interquartile range (IQR), 24.0 to 30.7 kg/m 2 ]. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (IQR, eight to 19). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6 to 49 months). Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and among them, 97% received regional lymph node irradiation. The overall rate of lymphedema was 9% at the end of the study period., Conclusions: With the use of strict follow-up guidelines over the long term, the authors' findings support that ILR at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is an effective procedure that reduces the risk of BCRL in a high-risk patient population., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Early detection and intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly decreases progression to persistent BCRL (pBCRL). We aimed to provide long-term follow-up on our early detection with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and early home intervention demonstrating reduced pBCRL to guide surveillance recommendations., Patients and Methods: In total, 148 female patients with breast cancer who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from November 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. Baseline BIS measurements and postoperative follow-up occurred every 3 months for 1 year, biannual for 1 year, and then annually. An elevated BIS triggered evaluation and initiation of at-home interventions with reassessment for resolution versus persistent BCRL (pBCRL). High-risk factors and timing were analyzed., Results: Mean follow-up was 55 months, and 65 (44%) patients had an abnormal BIS. Of these, 54 (82%) resolved with home intervention. The overall pBCRL rate was 8%. Average time to first abnormal BIS was 11.7 months. None of the stage 0 patients (0/34) and only 5/25 (20%) of stage 1 patients had pBCRL. All of stage 2 and stage 3 patients (7/7) had pBCRL. pBCRL correlated with number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, stage of lymphedema at diagnosis, and recurring abnormal BIS measurements (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: We have shown that patients undergoing ALND with early BCRL identified by BIS who performed home interventions had an 8% pBCRL rate. Patients at high risk for pBCRL should have routine surveillance starting at 9 months postoperatively to identify an opportunity for early intervention., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Breast cancer treatment is the principal cause of lymphedema in the upper extremities. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) treatments were previously based on conservative therapy; surgical treatments are alternative options that could be highly beneficial, especially for patients who are not responsive to conservative therapy. The main aim of this study was to describe and critically assess the risk of bias of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) on surgical treatment for BCRL., Methods: We conducted an evidence mapping review according to the methodology proposed by Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). An update was done for our previous systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane), and Epistemonikos from the year 2000 onward. We assessed the risk of bias for the RCTs and SRs using the RoB-2 and ROBIS tools, respectively., Results: Two surgical RCTs and eight SRs were found among the 47 surgical studies that met the eligibility criteria. The overall risk-of-bias assessments of these studies were rated as some concerns (six outcomes) and high risk (three outcomes) for the measured outcomes among the RCTs and as a high risk of bias (five studies) and low risk (three studies) for the included SRs., Conclusions: The overall evidence in the literature on surgical treatment for BCRL is low, as there are few published RCTs and SRs, and the risk-of-bias assessment for the majority was rated as high risk of bias or with some concerns. High-quality studies are needed to improve evidence-based decision-making by surgeons and patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The lateral upper arm channel is an accessory lymphatic pathway that drains the upper extremity by means of the deltopectoral groove and supraclavicular nodes, thereby bypassing the axilla. Its variable connectivity to the forearm has not been studied in vivo., Methods: Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was performed preoperatively to map the superficial and functional arm lymphatics in breast cancer patients without clinical or objective evidence of lymphedema. A retrospective review was performed to extract demographic, ICG imaging, and surgical data., Results: Sixty patients underwent ICG lymphography before axillary lymph node dissection between June of 2019 and October of 2020. In 59%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was contiguous with the forearm (long bundle). In 38%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was present but not contiguous with the forearm (short bundle). In 3%, the lateral upper arm pathway was entirely absent. Seven patients developed at least one sign of lymphedema during postoperative surveillance, of which 71% demonstrated the short bundle variant., Conclusion: Although the lateral upper arm pathway is most often present, its connections to the forearm are frequently absent (short bundle), which, in this pilot report, appears to represent a potential risk factor for the development of lymphedema., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, V., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background:  Lymphedema affects up to 34% of patients after breast cancer treatment but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Here, we use area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, to determine how socioeconomic status may affect risk for and diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema., Methods:  Records of patients who underwent surgical treatment of breast cancer between 2017-2020 were examined. Patients' nine-digit ZIP codes were utilized to determine their deprivation level as a national ADI percentile, and those fitting into the most and least deprived quartiles were compared with evaluate lymphedema risk factors and incidence., Results:  A total of 1,333 breast cancer patients were included, 812 (61%) of whom resided within the most disadvantaged ADI quartile nationally, and 521 within the least disadvantaged quartile. The most deprived group had higher rates of diabetes, obesity, and regional breast cancer, and received more extensive surgeries (7.5% modified radical mastectomy vs 1.9%, p  < 0.001) and chemotherapy compared with the least disadvantaged quartile. The most disadvantaged cohort were more often at extreme risk of lymphedema utilizing the Risk Assessment Tool Evaluating Lymphedema Risk (9.1% versus 2.5%, p  < 0.001); however, the incidence of lymphedema diagnoses was not significantly higher (13% vs 12%, p > 0.9). Logistic regression showed that the most deprived ADI quartile had 44% lower odds of a lymphedema diagnosis in comparison to the least deprived quartile., Conclusion:  Residing in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods is associated with lower odds of a lymphedema diagnosis, despite higher rates of risk factors for lymphedema, suggesting significant underdiagnosis in this population., Competing Interests: S.N.C., M.J.F., K.V., G.B.S., and J.M.C. have nothing to disclose. J.M.S. is a co-founder and equity holder of LifeSprout, and a consultant for 3M., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whether the breast reconstruction modality could influence the long-term development of post-mastectomy lymphedema has been little investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential association of the breast reconstruction method with the incidence of lymphedema over an extended follow-up period., Methods: Patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate reconstruction from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. They were categorized into three groups according to the reconstruction method: tissue expander/implant, abdominal flaps, and latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flaps. Differences in the cumulative incidence of lymphedema by the reconstruction method were analyzed, as well as their independent influence on the outcome. Further analyses were conducted with propensity-score matching for baseline characteristics., Results: In total, 664 cases were analyzed with a median follow-up of 83 months (402 prostheses, 180 abdominal flaps, and 82 LD flaps). The rate of axillary lymph node dissection was significantly higher in the LD flap group than in the other two groups. The 5-year cumulative incidences of lymphedema in the LD flap, abdominal flap, and prosthesis groups were 3.7%, 10.6%, and 10.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, compared to the use of the LD flap, that of tissue expander/implant and that of abdominal flaps were associated with increased risks of lymphedema. A similar association was observed in the propensity-score matching analysis. The use of abdominal flaps or prostheses was not associated with the outcomes., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the method of immediate breast reconstruction might be associated with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition that can negatively affect the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is emerging as a technique for the prevention of BCRL. This study compared the incidence of BRCL in patients who received ILR and those who were not amenable to ILR., Methods: Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database between 2016 and 2021. Some patients were deemed nonamenable to ILR due to a lack of visualized lymphatics or anatomic variability (eg, spatial relationships or size discrepancies). Descriptive statistics, independent t test, and Pearson χ 2 test were used. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to assess the association between lymphedema and ILR. A loose age-matched subsample was created for subanalysis., Results: Two hundred eighty-one patients were included in this study (252 patients who underwent ILR and 29 patients who did not). The patients had a mean age of 53 ± 12 years and body mass index of 28.6 ± 6.8 kg/m 2 . The incidence of developing lymphedema in patients with ILR was 4.8% compared with 24.1% in patients who underwent attempted ILR without lymphatic reconstruction ( P = 0.001). Patients who did not undergo ILR had significantly higher odds of developing lymphedema compared with those who had ILR (odds ratio, 10.7 [3.2-36.3], P < 0.001; matched OR, 14.2 [2.6-77.9], P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study showed that ILR was associated with lower rates of BCRL. Further studies are needed to determine which factors place patients at highest risk of developing BCRL., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite simultaneous microvascular breast reconstruction (MBR) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) gaining wide popularity as a potential treatment for breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL), there is a lack of evidence supporting the procedure. There are few reports in the literature, and no study has compared simple deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) to simultaneous DIEP flap and VLNT., Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of our series of DIEP flaps was conducted. Patients presenting with BCRL who had delayed MBR and simultaneous VLNT were selected. Thirty-two patients were included and compared with a control group of delayed MBR with DIEP flap alone. Clinical evaluation, circumference reduction rate, and LYMQOL questionnaire were used to compare preoperative and postoperative findings in the study group. A digital version of BREAST Q questionnaire was administered to all patients., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study group, with a mean follow-up of 42.5 ± 25.7 months and mean age of 54.1 ± 7.8 years. The mean circumference reduction rate was 46.1 ± 52.3, 39 ± 42.3, 47.5 ± 53.5, 39.2 ± 52.4, 33.6 ± 50.1 at the deltoid insertion, above the elbow, below the elbow, at the mid-forearm and wrist respectively. Postoperative LYMQOL scores significantly improved (function 1.21, appearance 1.15, symptoms 1.34, mood 1.33, overall QOLscore 8.6) from preoperative baseline (p < .001). There was no significant difference in term of outcomes and complications rate of the donor site between the study and control groups., Conclusions: Simultaneous DIEPandVLNT improves the HRQOL of patients with lymphedema. Coupling VLNT with abdominal flap does not increase the morbidity of donor site., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: We investigated whether a one-stage combination of vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) with water jet-assisted liposuction (WAL) can be safely performed and results in improved patient outcomes such as a greater reduction in arm volume when treating chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included all patients from our encrypted lymphedema database treated for chronic BCRL with VLNT or VLNT + WAL who had a minimum follow-up of two years. We analyzed patient-specific variables including arm circumferences as well as patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery as well as surgery time, surgery-related complications and patient satisfaction., Results: Only the mean preoperative differences of the circumferences between the lymphedematous and the unaffected arm in individual patients showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups (p < 0.05). Indeed, patients treated with VLNT + WAL had consistently larger differences in individual sets of arms and therefore more pronounced chronic BCRL. The mean surgery time was significantly longer in the VLNT + WAL group (p < 0.05). Complications were seldom and similar in both groups. Using a numeric rating scale, the level of patient satisfaction following treatment did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.323)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a one-stage combination of VLNT with WAL does not result in more complications even though it also entails a longer surgery time. This is acceptable as secondary interventions resulting in overall longer surgery times and higher costs can be avoided. A one-stage combination might be especially favourable for patients suffering from more severe chronic BCRL., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background:  Vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) are being used with increasing frequency for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). However, there is a lack of consensus in the surgical field as to which recipient site should be utilized. We, therefore, aim to assess the evidence comparing the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL., Methods:  We conducted a systematic literature review to compare the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL. Demographic data, as well as circumference reduction rate (CRR), excess volume reduction (EVR), postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate were extracted from included studies. These were compared through a meta-analysis., Results:  A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 689 patients. VLNTs to the wrist and axilla resulted in a decrease in CRR of 42.1 and 51.5%, and a decrease in EVR of 35.6 and 48.8%, respectively. However, our meta-analysis showed no significant differences between CRR or EVR and between wrist and axilla as recipient sites. Similarly, we found no differences in postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate., Conclusion:  These data suggest noninferiority between the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in the context of BCRL. In the absence of randomized, prospective data, we hope these results can be used as an evidence-based reference and facilitate future studies., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is primarily used for treating early-stage lymphedema. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between lymphatic flow velocity and the efficacy of LVA in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients. To this end, we assessed the transit velocity of lymphatic fluid using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography and radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy., Methods: We retrospectively examined patients diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema who underwent LVA from January to December 2020. Patient data, including demographics, clinical stage, and postoperative surgical outcomes, were collected from electronic medical records. ICG lymphography results and dynamic lymphoscintigrams were analyzed to measure the lymphatic flow velocity and to determine the grade of the limb lymphedemas., Results: Eighty patients (all female, mean age of 53.6 years) were included. The lymphatic flow velocity ranged between 0.58 and 21.5 cm/min (average, 7.61 cm/min); 37 (46.3%), 18 (22.5%), 15 (18.8%), and 10 (12.5%) arm lymphedemas were classified as lymphoscintigraphy grade 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A significant association was observed between lymphatic flow velocity and lymphedema grade determined using lymphoscintigraphy and between the amount of volume reduction after LVA and preoperative lymphatic flow velocity (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lymphatic flow velocity is positively correlated with surgical outcomes in patients undergoing LVA. Therefore, surgical treatment plans for lymphedema should not be based only on the International Society of Lymphedema stage, because advanced-stage lymphedema patients with high ICG velocities can benefit from LVA alone., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

Introduction: Lymphedema is a condition which heavily impacts patients QoL. For patients who desire autologous breast reconstruction, lymph nodes can be included in the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery (DIEP) flap combining vascularized lymph node transfer and autologous breast reconstruction., Material and Methods: Patients who received autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap in combination with vascularized lymph nodes were included in this study. Volume measurements pre and post-surgery were analyzed and surveys including two versions of the ULL-27 questionnaire to measure QoL before and after surgery were send., Results: In total, 45 out of 64 patients returned the questionnaires. The average follow up was 51 months. The total ULL-27 score increased with 12.6 points on average (p = 0.00). The subdomain scores (physical, psychological and social) also significantly increased (p = 0.00). In addition 69% of patients were able to decrease physiotherapy, 63% of patients were able to decrease compression garment usage and the incidence of skin infections decreased in 6 patients out of 7 patients who had recurrent skin infections prior to surgery. The volume difference between the affected and the healthy arm did not significantly change (407 ml-406 ml, p = 0.988)., Conclusions: Vascularized lymph node transfer in combination with DIEP flap breast reconstruction can cause a significant improvement on lymphedema related QoL, even when a volume difference decrease is absent. It can also decrease compression garment usage and reduce the need for physiotherapy. Future prospective studies should evaluate these findings and identify patients that benefit most from such procedures., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Significance: Lymphedema is chronic limb swelling from lymphatic dysfunction. The condition affects up to 250 million people worldwide. In breast cancer patients, lymphedema occurs in 30% who undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Recent Advances: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR), also termed Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LyMPHA), is a method to decrease the risk of lymphedema by performing prophylactic lymphovenous anastomoses at the time of ALND. The objective of this study is to assess the risk reduction of ILR in preventing lymphedema. Critical Issues: Lymphedema has significant effects on the quality of life and morbidity of patients. Several techniques have been described to manage lymphedema after development, but prophylactic treatment of lymphedema with ILR may decrease risk of development to 6.6%. Future Directions: Long-term studies that demonstrate efficacy of ILR may allow for prophylactic management of lymphedema in the patient undergoing lymph node dissection.

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a progressive disease that poses tremendous physical, psychosocial, and financial burden on patients. Immediate lymphaticovenular anastomosis at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is emerging as a potential therapeutic paradigm to decrease the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema in high-risk patients., Methods: Eighty-one consecutive patients underwent reverse lymphatic mapping and, when feasible, supermicrosurgical immediate lymphaticovenular anastomosis at the time of axillary lymph node dissection at a tertiary care cancer center. Patients were followed prospectively in a multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic (plastic surgery, certified lymphatic therapy, dietary, case management) at 3-month intervals with clinical examination, circumferential limb girth measurements, and bioimpedance spectroscopy. An institutional control cohort was assessed for the presence of objectively diagnosed and treated breast cancer-related lymphedema. Data were analyzed by a university statistician., Results: Seventy-eight patients met inclusion, and 66 underwent immediate lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Mean follow-up was 250 days. When compared to a retrospective control group, the rate of lymphedema in patients who underwent immediate lymphaticovenular anastomosis was significantly lower (6 percent versus 44 percent; p < 0.0001). Patients with 6-month follow-up treated with combined adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy had significantly greater risk of developing breast cancer-related lymphedema (p = 0.04) compared to those without combined adjuvant therapy. Arborized anastomotic technique had a statistically shorter operative time than end-to-end anastomosis (p = 0.005)., Conclusions: This series of consecutive patients demonstrate a 6 percent incidence of early-onset breast cancer-related lymphedema with immediate lymphaticovenular anastomosis and an increased risk in those undergoing combined adjuvant treatment. These early data represent an encouraging and substantial decrease of breast cancer-related lymphedema in high-risk patients., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Lymphedema is an edematous condition that afflicts the postmastectomy breast cancer population, with diminished quality of life with substantial financial costs. The factors predictive of postmastectomy lymphedema development in breast cancer patients are unknown. The objective was to evaluate the trends over time in lymphedema development and the risk factors predictive of lymphedema-related events within 2 years of mastectomy., Methods: Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System multicenter deidentified database from 2010 to 2016, a total of 65,543 breast cancer postmastectomy female patients (mean age, 59 ± 20 years) were identified across 177 facilities. The breast cancer patients were followed for any 2-year postmastectomy lymphedema-related events. A multivariable model identified predictors of 2-year lymphedema using eligible variables involving demographics, comorbidities, and complications. Elixhauser score was defined as a comorbidity index based on International Classification of Diseases codes used in hospital settings., Results: Overall, 5.2% (n = 3409) of the breast cancer postmastectomy patients experienced a lymphedema-related event within 2 years of initial surgery. Over time, 2-year postmastectomy lymphedema rates have more than doubled from 4.62% in 2010 to 9.75% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Two-year postmastectomy lymphedema rates varied significantly by mastectomy procedure type: 5.69% of the mastectomy-only procedures, 5.96% of the mastectomies with lymph node biopsies, and 7.83% of the mastectomies with lymph node dissections (P < 0.0001). Full mastectomies had a greater 2-year lymphedema rate of 7.31% when compared with partial mastectomies with 2.79% (P < 0.0001). The top predictive risk factors for a lymphedema-related event included higher Elixhauser score, prolonged hospitalization for mastectomy, more recent mastectomy procedure, obesity, younger age, non-Asian race, Medicaid insurance, and hypertension (all P's < 0.01)., Conclusions: Although more recent postmastectomy lymphedema rates may not be as high as historical estimates, the 2-year postmastectomy lymphedema rates have more than doubled from 2010 to 2016 requiring further elucidation as well as continued focus on treatment. Furthermore, risk factors were identified that predispose postmastectomy breast cancer patients to developing lymphedema. Given these findings, perioperative screening seems warranted to proactively identify, educate, and monitor postmastectomy patients at greatest risk of future lymphedema development., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of the Study: Studying the long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) to obtain preliminary data on the oncological safety of the method, necessary for planning further extensive studies., Material and Methods: The pilot study included 18 women aged 45 to 70 years (mean age 55.6 years) with breast cancer of stages I-IIIA (stage I - in 4 cases, stage IIA - in 8 cases, stage IIIA - in 6 cases) and postmastectomy lymphedema. 11 (61%) patients received complex treatment, 7 (39%) patients received combined treatment. ESWT from the MasterPuls MP200 apparatus was performed with a radial shock wave on the axillary region on the side of the surgical operation using a dynamic technique: R-SW applicator with a standard D20-S nozzle, penetration depth 50 mm, pressure 2-2.5 bar, pulse frequency 8-10 Hz, 2000-4000 pulses each session, 1 time per week, 5 procedures in 1 course., Results: After a course of ESWT, the average decrease in the volume of the edematous upper limb for the entire group of patients was 41.8±4.6% ( p <0.05) with the effect maintained for 3 years. During 3 years of observation, none of the patients developed breast cancer progression - ESWT did not have a negative effect on the course of breast cancer and did not worsen oncological parameters., Conclusion: Obtained data can serve as a basis for well-organized cohort studies of the expediency of using shock wave therapy in oncology rehabilitation of patients.

Background: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis, a supermicrosurgical technique, creates bypasses between the lymphatic and venous systems. The quality of lymphaticovenous anastomosis depends on the surgeon's dexterity and precision, and is subject to imperfections caused by the physiologic tremor of the human hand. A dedicated robot for microsurgery has been created to overcome these limitations (MUSA, MicroSure, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). This study describes 1-year clinical outcomes of the first-in-human trial of robot-assisted and manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema., Methods: In this prospective pilot study, women with breast cancer-related lymphedema were randomized into the robot-assisted or manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis group. Outcomes were quality of life, arm circumference, conservative treatment frequency, arm dermal backflow stage, and anastomosis patency., Results: Twenty women were included, of whom eight underwent robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery and 12 underwent manual surgery. In both groups, quality of life significantly improved at 12 months (robot-assisted surgery, p = 0.045; manual surgery, p = 0.001). Arm circumference did not decrease (robot-assisted surgery, p = 0.094; manual surgery, p = 0.240). Daily use of compression garments decreased by 61.9 percent (robot-assisted surgery) and 70.2 percent (manual surgery). The frequency of manual lymphatic drainage remained similar compared with baseline. Arm dermal backflow stage was reduced in one patient in the robot-assisted group and in five cases in the manual group. Overall, 76.5 percent of the anastomoses were patent (robot-assisted surgery, 66.6 percent; manual surgery, 81.8 percent)., Conclusions: After evaluating 1-year follow-up data, this study confirms the feasibility of robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery. Clinical outcomes were comparable between robot-assisted and manual lymphaticovenous anastomosis. This encourages further research using the new microsurgical robot MUSA for lymphaticovenous anastomosis and other (super)microsurgical procedures., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, II., Competing Interests: Disclosure: Dr. van Mulken is a clinical advisor at and shareholder in MicroSure (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Dr. Cau is chief technical officer at and a shareholder in MicroSure. Dr. van der Hulst is a shareholder in MicroSure. The remaining authors have no relevant conflict of interest. The robotic equipment for this pilot trial was provided by MicroSure., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background:  Locally advanced breast cancer is commonly found in Indonesia. In this group of patients, aggressive treatment such as axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) with or without regional nodal irradiation (RNI) will increase the risk of breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) in our patients. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has been established as a minimally invasive approach in lymphedema surgery. In this study, we report our first experience of LVAs in BCRL patients., Methods:  This was a cross-sectional study taken from breast cancer patients receiving ALND with or without RNI. From December 2018 until June 2020, we collected and described general patient information, tumor characteristics, diagnostic methods, and the outcome of LVA. Postoperative subjective symptoms scores (lymphedema quality-of-life score [LeQOLiS]) and lymphedematous volume (upper extremity lymphedema [UEL] index) were compared with preoperative ones., Results:  Seventy patients experienced BCRL with the mean age of 54.8 (9.4) years and mean body mass index of 28.1 (4.5). ALND was performed in 66 (97.1%) cases and RNI was given in 58 (82.9%) patients. Thirty-one (44.3%) patients were in the International Society of Lymphology stage 1, 24 (34.3%) in stage 2A, and 15 (21.4%) in stage 2B. The mean lymphatic vessel diameter was 0.5 (0.26) mm and 0.80 (0.54) mm for the vein. Lymphosclerosis severity was 7 (4%) in S0 type, 129 (74.1%) in S1 type, 37 (21.3%) in S2 type, and 1 (0.6%) in S3 type. In histopathology examination, S1 types were in lower grade injury, while S2 and S3 types were in the higher grade. Seven (53.8%) cases of S2 type showed severe fibrosis from trichrome staining. Postoperative LeQOLiSs were significantly lower than preoperative ones (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.6; p  = 0.000). With the mean follow-up of 7.4 (3.7) months, the overall UEL index reduction was 9.2%; mean -11 (16.8). Postoperative UEL index was significantly lower than preoperative ones (117.7 ± 26.5 vs. 106.9 ± 18.5; p  = 0.000). No complications were observed during this period., Conclusion:  LVA reduced the subjective symptoms and UEL index in BCRL cases. Future studies using updated imaging technologies of the lymphatic system and longer follow-up time are needed to confirm our results., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Secondary lymphedema is the abnormal collection of lymphatic fluid within subcutaneous structures. Patients with lymphedema suffer a low quality of life. In our study, we aim to provide a systematic review of the current data on patient outcomes regarding breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), and the most prevalent reconstructive techniques., Methods: A PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus literature search was performed in September 2020. Studies were screened based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and it was reported in line with the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)., Results: The search yielded 254 papers from 2010 to 2020. 67 were included in our study. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA)-a minimally invasive procedure diverting the lymph into the dermal venous drainage system-combined with postoperative bandaging and compression garments yields superior results with minimal donor site lymphedema morbidity. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT)-another microsurgical technique, often combined with autologous free flap breast reconstruction-improves lymphedema and brachial plexus neuropathies, and reduces the risk of cellulitis. The combination of LVA and VLNT or with other methods maximizes their effectiveness. Vascularized lymph vessel transfer (VLVT) consists of harvesting certain lymph vessels, sparing the donor site's lymph nodes., Conclusion: Together with integrated lymphedema therapy, proper staging, and appropriate selection of procedure, safe and efficient surgical techniques can be beneficial to many patients with BCRL., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Lymph node transfer (LNT) and lymphovenous bypass (LVB) have been described as 2 major surgical options for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who have failed conservative therapy. The objective of our study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LNT and LVB for the treatment of BCRL., Study Design: Rates of infection, lymph leak, and failure of LNT and LVB were obtained from a previously published meta-analysis. Failure of surgery was defined as the inability to cease compression therapy postoperatively. Procedural costs were calculated from Medicare reimbursement rates. Cost of conservative management of postoperative surgical site infection, lymph leak, and continued decongestive physiotherapy after failed surgery were obtained from literature review. Average utility scores for each health state were calculated using a visual analog scale survey, then converted to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A decision tree was constructed, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was assessed at $50,000/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of our findings., Results: LNT was less costly ($22,492 vs $31,927) and more effective (31.82 QALY vs 29.24 QALY) than LVB. One-way (deterministic) sensitivity analysis demonstrated that LNT became cost-ineffective when its failure rate was more than 43.8%. LVB became more cost-effective than LNT when its failure rate was less than 21.4%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation indicated that even with uncertainty present in the variables analyzed, the majority of simulations (97%) favored LNT as the more cost-effective strategy., Conclusions: LNT is a dominant, cost-effective strategy compared to LVB for the treatment of BCRL., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Upper limb lymphedema is one of the most common complications after breast cancer surgery and radiotherapy. At present, physical methods and surgical methods can be used for treatment. Surgical operations are mainly based on lymphovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfer. For these 2 surgical methods, we analyzed and compared the literature review and our own clinical experience. We summarized the differences between the 2 surgical techniques and the selection methods. We hope to help more young plastic surgeons and breast doctors understand how to treat upper limb lymphedema through surgical methods and help patients improve their quality of life., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: The study was presented at the 7th Congress of the World Association of Plastic Surgeons of Chinese Descent (WAPSCD), Hangzhou, China. The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reverse lymphatic mapping before harvesting a lymph node flap is crucial to avoid donor-site lymphedema; however, the technique is complex and unavailable in many centers. The authors introduce radioisotope-free reverse lymphatic mapping using indocyanine green and Patent Blue dye., Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study in patients undergoing free vascularized groin lymph node transfer for postmastectomy upper extremity lymphedema. The day before surgery, 0.2 ml of technetium-99 was injected into the first and second web spaces of the ipsilateral foot. The following day, once the patient was anesthetized, indocyanine green was injected into the same web spaces of the same foot and Patent Blue dye was injected just proximal to the upper margin of the skin paddle of the lymph node flap. The main lymph nodes draining the limb were localized using indocyanine green lymphography and gamma probe., Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent vascularized groin lymph node transfer with or without deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. Navigation of the main lower extremity draining inguinal lymph nodes using the gamma probe and indocyanine green lymphography was identical in all patients. The blue-stained lymphatics in the skin paddle drained to the superficial proximal inguinal lymph node and were targeted for transfer. No donor-site lymphedema was reported, and lymphatic drainage of the lower extremity was preserved in all cases., Conclusions: Reverse lymphatic mapping using indocyanine green lymphography provides identical results to those using technetium-99 isotope scanning. However, indocyanine green is preferable in terms of safety and reproducibility and also avoids the complexity and hazards of radioisotope mapping., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Purpose: We sought to determine if bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements can accurately assess changes in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in patients undergoing lymphovenous bypass (LVB)., Methods: Patients undergoing LVB for BCRL refractory to conservative treatment from 1/2015 to 12/2018 were identified from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained database at a single institution. All breast cancer patients were assessed with baseline BIS measurements prior to any oncologic surgery and serial BIS during follow-up office visits including before and after LVB. Clinicopathologic information, LVB operative details, and pre- and post-LVB operative BIS measurements were collected. Analysis focused on clinically significant BIS change, defined as two standard deviations (SD), and comparing LVB anastomosis to BIS changes., Results: During the study timeframe, nine patients underwent LVB for treatment of BCRL. The majority (78%) received radiation, taxane chemotherapy, and underwent axillary dissection. An average of 5.6 LVB anastomoses were performed per patient. The average change in BIS following LVB was a 3SD reduction, indicating a clinically significant change. This improvement was stable over time, with persistent 2SD reduction at 22 months postoperatively. The number of LVB anastomoses performed did not significantly correlate with the degree of BIS change., Conclusions: This is the first study to utilize BIS measurements to assess response to LVB surgical intervention for BCRL. BIS measurements demonstrated clinically significant improvement after LVB, providing objective evidence in support of this surgical treatment for BCRL. BIS changes should be reported as key objective data in future studies assessing BCRL interventions, including response to LVB.

Background: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) microsurgery is conducted in selected specialist lymphatic programs as a surgical treatment option for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) with variation in treatment outcomes. Methods and Results: Ten patients with BCRL underwent VLNT from 2012 to 2015. Donor sites were the inguinal ( n  = 6) or supraclavicular fossa/neck ( n  = 4) regions and recipient sites were the axilla ( n  = 6) or elbow regions ( n  = 4). Outcomes included changes in limb volume and extracellular fluid ratios, postoperative garment use, number of cellulitis episodes, and self-reported symptom improvement. At a mean follow-up of 46 months from surgery (range: 28-66 months), the excess volume in the affected arm had reduced ( n  = 4) or remained stable ( n  = 1) for 5 of 10 patients (50%) (mean change: -106.4 mL, range: -515.5 to +69.6 mL). Four of these five patients had also reduced ( n  = 3) or discontinued ( n  = 1) wearing compression garments and three reported a reduction in episodes of cellulitis. The remaining five patients had an increase of over 100 mL in postoperative excess volume (mean change: 295.8 mL, range: 142.1-382.8 mL). Three of these five patients reported noncompliance with compression garments. Despite the increase in limb volume, some patients reported softness in swelling ( n  = 3) and better response to conservative treatment ( n  = 1). Conclusion: Our results warrant continuation of VLNT as a surgical treatment option for patients with BCRL and show that the burden of conservative management such as wearing garments can be reduced over time for some patients. Longer term follow-up with standardized measures across all centers is required to further investigate VLNT.

Background: Patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema can be treated with a simultaneous deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer, and lymphovenous anastomosis for aesthetic breast reconstruction and lymphedema in one operation., Methods: The authors performed a comparison of prospectively followed patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and anastomosis to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer alone., Results: Thirty-three patients underwent DIEP flap reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, and 21 received a free flap with lymph node transfer alone. There were no significant differences in demographics, adjuvant chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. The average number of nodes removed was also equivalent (21.2 versus 21.4 nodes). Two anastomoses per patient, on average, were performed (range, one to four) in the combined cohort, and all patients (100 percent) reported a subjective improvement in symptoms, compared with 81.0 percent of patients undergoing only lymph node transfer (p = 0.019). Perometer measurements demonstrated a significant reduction between the groups at early time points [3 months, 40.7 percent versus 20.0 percent (p = 0.037); 6 months, 57.0 percent versus 44.5 percent (p = 0.043)]; however, the difference was not statistically significant at 12 months (60.4 percent versus 57.8 percent; p = 0.43)., Conclusion: This is the first prospective study demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a combined DIEP flap with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, which may be superior to lymph node transfer alone., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] levels on the presence and severity of lymphedema, and on the levels of pain, disability, and function in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and Results: This controlled study included 71 patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma. Participants were divided into two groups. The BCRL group included 37 breast cancer patients with lymphedema and the control group included 34 breast carcinoma patients without lymphedema. Demographic information, dominant extremity, affected breast, duration of malignancy, and serum 25(OH)D3 levels were recorded for all patients. The 25(OH)D3 levels were then compared between groups. The correlations between serum 25(OH)D3 levels and the visual analog scale (VAS) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) scales and the volumetric and diametric differences between the upper extremities were analyzed in the BCRL group. Serum 25(OH)D3 levels did not show statistically significant differences between groups ( p  > 0.05). There was no correlation in the BCRL group between 25(OH)D3 levels and the VAS and Q-DASH scores or the diametric and volumetric differences of extremities ( r  ≤ 0.3; p  > 0.05). Conclusions: Serum 25(OH)D3 levels do not appear to affect the presence or severity of lymphedema, pain, disability, or physical function in BCRL patients. In routine clinical practice, evaluation of this vitamin level does not appear to be necessary for lymphedema in BCRL patients.

Introduction: Early breast cancer detection and advancements in treatment options have resulted in an increase of breast cancer survivors. An increasing number of women are living with the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment, making the quality of survivorship an increasingly important goal. Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most underestimated complications of breast cancer treatment with a reported incidence of 20%. A microsurgical technique called lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) might be a promising treatment modality for patients with BCRL. The main objective is to assess whether LVA is more effective than the current standard therapy (conservative treatment) in terms of improvement in quality of life and weather it is cost-effective., Methods and Analysis: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial, carried out in two academic and two community hospitals in the Netherlands. The study population includes 120 women over the age of 18 who have undergone treatment for breast cancer including axillary treatment (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection) and/or axillary radiotherapy, presenting with an early stage lymphoedema of the arm, viable lymphatic vessels and received at least 3 months conservative treatment. Sixty participants will undergo the LVA operation and the other sixty will continue their regular conservative treatment, both with a follow-up of 24 months. The primary outcome is the health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are societal costs, quality adjusted life years, cost-effectiveness ratio, discontinuation rate of conservative treatment and excess limb volume., Ethics and Dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center (METC) on 19 December 2018 (NL67059.068.18). The results of this study will be disseminated in presentations at academic conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and other news media., Trial Registration Number: NCT02790021; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a surgical treatment for lymphedema. Multiple methods have been described and each has significant disadvantages., Study Design: We performed VLNT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema resulting from breast cancer surgery. We used lymph nodes of the greater curvature of the stomach (VLNTg). We describe outcomes of the patients suffering from postmastectomy lymphedema who received VLNTg for treatment of lymphedema. Harvest from the periphery of the left gastroepiploic vessel was conducted., Results: We retrospectively reviewed data of 24 female patients suffering from lymphedema following breast cancer treatment who underwent lymph node transplantation from 2012 to 2017. Axillary lymphadenectomy had been performed in all cases. In 18 patients, upper limb lymphedema was present for at least 1 year (mean = 5.6 years; range, 1-15 years). In 6 patients, it was present for only a few months (mean = 5 months; range, 3-8 months)., Conclusions: The greater curvature of the stomach nodes (VLNTg) is an excellent option for the treatment of upper extremity lymphedema because there is no risk of complications and the scar is easily concealed. Improvement from lymphedema can be expected in a majority of patients., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)