Search

BACKGROUND: The decision to screen for breast cancer among older adults with dementia is complex and must often be individualized, as these individuals have an elevated risk of harm from over-screening. Medicare beneficiaries with dementia are increasingly enrolling in Medicare Advantage plans, which typically promote receipt of preventive cancer screening among their enrollees. This study examined the utilization of breast cancer screening among Medicare enrollees with dementia, in Medicare Advantage and in fee-for-service Medicare. METHODS: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study of women with Alzheimers disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment who were eligible for mammogram screening. We used Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data to identify utilization of biennial mammogram screening between 2012 and 2019. Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios of mammogram utilization and to calculate adjusted mammogram rates for Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees with dementia, and further stratified by rurality and by dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid. RESULTS: Mammogram utilization was 16% higher (Prevalence Ratio [PR] 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.29) among Medicare Advantage enrollees with dementia, compared to their counterparts in fee-for-service Medicare. Rural enrollees experienced no significant difference (PR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.37) in mammogram use between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. Among urban enrollees, Medicare Advantage enrollment was associated with a 21% higher mammogram rate (PR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.35). Dual-eligible Medicare Advantage enrollees had a 34% higher mammogram rate (PR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.63) than dual-eligible fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. Among non-dual-eligible enrollees, adjusted mammogram rates were not significantly different (PR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.24) between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries age 65-74 with Alzheimers disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment had a higher mammogram use rate when they were enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans compared to fee-for-service Medicare, especially when they were dual-eligible or lived in urban areas. However, some Medicare Advantage enrollees with Alzheimers disease and related dementias or cognitive impairment may have experienced over-screening for breast cancer.

Background: This study investigates breast cancer screening disparities among Mexican immigrant women in rural and urban U.S. communities, focusing on cultural beliefs, healthcare access, and geographical differences. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 350 Mexican immigrant women aged 40+ without prior cancer diagnosis was conducted in rural (<2000 population) and urban parts of the U.S. in 2015. Culturally tailored surveys during household visits, clinic appointments, and community meetings assessed cultural beliefs, mammography engagement, and family support. Comparative analyses t -tests and chi-square tests were conducted, with significance set at P <.05. Results: Rural women demonstrated higher adherence to spiritualismo (M = 4.31, SD = 1.13) compared to their urban counterparts (M = 3.91, SD = 1.36), marianismo (M = 3.33, SD = 0.45 vs M = 3.21, SD = 0.48), and machismo (M = 3.02, SD = 0.52 vs M = 2.80, SD = 0.61). The rural women also reported higher mammography rates (54.4% vs 45.6%), with 60.4% undergoing four or more mammograms. Despite barriers such as doctor non-recommendation (55.0% rural vs 45.0% urban) and embarrassment (67.9% rural vs 32.1% urban), rural women engaged more in family discussions about cancer screenings (61.7% vs 38.3%) and received more family assistance in finding health information (59.8% vs 40.2%). Conclusions: This study elucidates significant rural-urban disparities in cultural adherence and family support among Mexican immigrant women, underscoring the necessity for culturally tailored interventions to enhance breast cancer screening rates and health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammography and MRI screening typically occur in combination or in alternating sequence. We compared multimodality screening performance accounting for the relative timing of mammography and MRI and overlapping follow-up periods. We identified 8,260 screening mammograms performed 2005 to 2017 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, paired with screening MRIs within ±90 days (combined screening) or 91 to 270 days (alternating screening). Performance for combined screening (cancer detection rate [CDR] per 1,000 examinations and sensitivity) was calculated with 1-year follow-up for each modality, and with a single follow-up period treating the two tests as a single test. Alternating screening performance was calculated with 1-year follow-up for each modality and also with follow-up ending at the next screen if within 1 year (truncated follow-up). For 3,810 combined screening pairs, CDR per 1,000 screens was 6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6-10.0) for mammography and 12.3 (95% CI: 9.3-16.4) for MRI as separate tests compared with 13.1 (95% CI: 10.0-17.3) as a single combined test. Sensitivity of each test was 48.1% (35.0%-61.5%) for mammography and 79.7% (95% CI: 67.7%-88.0%) for MRI compared with 96.2% (95% CI: 85.9%-99.0%) for combined screening. For 4,450 alternating screening pairs, mammography CDR per 1,000 screens changed from 3.6 (95% CI: 2.2-5.9) to zero with truncated follow-up; sensitivity was incalculable (denominator = 0). MRI CDR per 1,000 screens changed from 12.1 (95% CI 9.3-15.8) to 11.7 (95% CI: 8.9-15.3) with truncated follow-up; sensitivity changed from 75.0% (95% CI 63.8%-83.6%) to 86.7% (95% CI 75.5%-93.2%). Updating auditing approaches to account for combined and alternating screening sequencing and to address outcome attribution issues arising from overlapping follow-up periods can improve the accuracy of multimodality screening performance evaluation. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Concrete, data-driven guidelines for breast cancer screening among the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population is lacking. The present study evaluates possible associations of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on incidental breast pathology findings in trans-masculine patients to inform decision making about breast cancer screening. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had gender-affirming mastectomy or breast reduction at a single center from July 2019 to February 2024. A total of 865 patients met the inclusion criteria. Gender-affirming testosterone therapy and length of exposure were evaluated to seek differences in post-operative pathology findings. Results: The median age at the time of surgery was 27 years [interquartile range (IQR) 21–30]. Most participants identified as female to male (658, 75.6%). A significant portion of the participants (688, 79.2%) were undergoing testosterone therapy at the time of surgery, with the median duration of testosterone use prior to surgery being 14 months (IQR 4–29). High risk or malignant findings were noted in pathology results for 12 of 1730 breasts (0.7%). Ordered logistic regression found that duration of testosterone therapy was not associated with increasing severity of incidental breast pathology. Additionally, patients under 25 years of age were 70% less likely to have any incidental finding on pathological evaluation than older patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, p < 0.01, confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.50]. Conclusions: The present study found that patients undergoing GAHT should not be screened for breast cancer with increased frequency compared with cis-gender women. Additionally, it may be appropriate for trans women under the age of 25 with normal breast cancer risk to forego pathological breast tissue examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast Cancer remains among the top five cancers responsible for morbidity and mortality globally. For many years, infectious (communicable) diseases were a primary concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to higher-income countries, where non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were already a major concern. However, starting from the early 2000s, the LMICs including Tanzania has witnessed an epidemiological transition being equally affected by NCDs, and breast cancer, is among the prevalent NCDs. While the evidence is vast on the role of breast cancer screening messages in promoting screening, debunking myths, and addressing barriers to the uptake of breast cancer services, context-specific messages are limited. Amidst the changing technology, growth of social media and cultural dynamics, context-specific breast cancer screening messages are needed. We aimed to analyze the breast cancer screening messages from the experiences of women seeking care at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania. Methods: An exploratory qualitative case study adopting in-depth interviews (IDI) and focused group discussion (FGD) was carried out among purposefully selected women aged from 18 years to 65 years seeking care from Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eighteen women participated in the IDIs, and 16 women participated in FGD. Data analysis followed inductive qualitative content analysis. Findings: Three main categories emerged: the existence of multiple sources of breast cancer screening messages, the strengths and weaknesses of breast cancer screening messages, and clients' mixed perceptions of breast cancer screening messages. Conclusion: The findings of this study depict that although breast cancer screening promotion messages are regarded as a source of information about cancers, they fall short of completeness and relevance to the otherwise at-risk population and trigger negative perceptions toward screening. Therefore, this study advocates revisiting the breast cancer screening messages, employing participatory approaches to tailor the screening messages and communication media to fit specific audiences. This calls for re-designing both the content of the messages and means of delivery; thus, collaborative efforts are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly recommended to assist mammography for women at high risk of breast cancer (BC). This study explored the knowledge, attitude, and willingness toward breast MRI screening among women at high risk of BC. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled women at high risk of BC between August 2022 and January 2023 in Beijing, China. A structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among knowledge, attitude, and willingness. Results: A total of 596 questionnaires were collected, and 412 questionnaires (69.13%) were valid. The women's knowledge and attitude scores were 7.75 ± 2.79 (possible range: 0–12) and 48.53 ± 6.31 (possible range: 13–65). Among the women, 297 (72.09%) were willing to undergo regular breast MRI screening. The SEM showed that knowledge had direct effect on attitude [β = 0.77, 95% CI: (0.57, 0.98), P < 0.001], the attitude had direct effect on willingness [β = 0.02, 95% CI: (0.01, 0.02), P < 0.001], knowledge had an indirect effect on willingness through attitude [β = 0.01, 95% CI: (0.01,0.02), P < 0.001], and the direct effect of knowledge on practice was not significant. Conclusions: The women at high risk of BC had insufficient knowledge and a relatively positive attitude toward breast MRI screening. Most of them were willing to undergo regular breast MRI screening. Advertising and public health education programs should be designed to improve their knowledge and attitude, therefore improving their willingness and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background Purpose Method Results Conclusion Breast cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancers in Arab countries. Lack of knowledge and awareness regarding breast cancer screening has increased the breast cancer‐related morbidity and mortality.This literature review aimed to assess published research papers with a focus on the levels of knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers of women in Arab countries of the Middle East toward breast cancer and its screening.SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched using specific terms for relevant, quantitative, original studies published between 2017 and 2022. All English articles that matched the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Fourteen studies focusing on knowledge, attitudes, and barriers regarding breast cancer were included. Two independent reviewers performed screening and extraction.Among the reviewed studies, a range from 19.6% in Oman to 67% in Saudi Arabia had poor knowledge of breast cancer. Past personal or family history was a well‐recognized risk factor (n = 5), and being worried about the results was the most common barrier to screening. Although most women were aware of screening methods, the majority did not practice screening. Social media and the internet were the most used sources of information used by women to obtain knowledge regarding breast cancer and its screening (n = 6).Most of the Arab female population had low levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding breast cancer and its screening. Programs designed to raise awareness are necessary, and more policy changes must take place on the national level in Arab, Middle Eastern countries to address the low knowledge, the negative attitudes, and the limited access to breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Breast cancer screening programs are widely promoted because of their effectiveness in the early detection of cancer. However, a significant proportion of eligible Catholic nuns in the Lake Zone of Tanzania remain underscreened. This study is aimed at investigating the factors associated with breast cancer screening uptake among Catholic nuns in Lake Zone, Tanzania. Methods: This was a cross‐sectional study design among 385 catholic nuns. Simple random sampling was deployed to enrolled catholic nuns, the ODK collect v2023.2.4 was electronically used to collect data. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with the uptake of breast cancer screening. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 18.0, with a significance level set at a p value less than 0.05. Result: The prevalence uptake of breast cancer screening (i.e., breast self‐examination, clinical examination, or mammography examination) was 64% (n = 247, 95% CI, 59.3%–68.9%). A total of 57.4% had inadequate knowledge on the uptake of breast cancer screening (n = 221, 95% CI, 52.4%–62.4%). Also, the study found that 61.3% (95% CI, 56.4%–66.2%) of Catholic Nuns have negative attitudes towards the uptake of self‐breast examination among Catholic nuns. The findings revealed that 55.6% (n = 133, 95% CI, 50.6%–60.6%) and 52.7% (n = 52.7%, 95% CI, 47.7%–57.7%) of Catholic nuns negatively accept breast cancer screening and self‐breast examination, respectively. Nuns aged above 60 years were less likely to not perform BCS with a COR of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.39–0.97). Also, Catholic nuns who are in the nonhealth field are more likely to not perform BCS with a COR of 1.71 (95%, 1.07–2.74). Likewise, Catholic nuns who had negative acceptability of the Self‐breast examination were more likely to not perform BCS with an AOR of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.07–2.55). Conclusion: A study found a low uptake of breast cancer screening among Catholic nuns. This highlights the need for breast health intervention programs within religious congregations to address misconceptions and promote early detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To characterize distance traveled for breast cancer screening and to sites of service for breast cancer treatment, among rural and urban women served by a Washington State healthcare network. Methods: Data for this study came from one of the largest not-for-profit integrated healthcare delivery systems in Washington State. Generalized linear mixed models with gamma log link function were used to examine the associations between travel distance and sociodemographic and contextual characteristics of patients. Results: Median travel distance for breast cancer screening facilities, hematologist/oncologists, radiation oncologists, or surgeons was 11, 19, 23, or 11 miles, respectively. Travel distance to breast cancer screening or referral facilities was longer in non-core metropolitan ZIP codes compared to metropolitan ZIP codes. AI/AN and Hispanic women travelled longer distances to reach referral facilities compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Conclusion: Disparities exist in travel distance to breast cancer screening and treatment. Further research is needed to describe sociodemographic and system level characteristics that contribute to such disparities and to discover novel approaches to alleviate this burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to assess the recognition and understanding of breast awareness (BA) among hospital staff, a group considered influential in disseminating information about health. Compared to the traditional approach of breast self-examination (BSE), BA has gained prominence as a concept focused on early detection. The study also explored the effectiveness of an informational leaflet in conveying BA concepts. Methods: We conducted an online, voluntary, and anonymous questionnaire survey at St. Luke's International Hospital in Japan, where approximately 1,000 breast cancer surgeries are performed annually. The survey comprised three sections: pre-leaflet questions, the informational leaflet, and post-leaflet questions. Results: From a pool of 500 completed questionnaires, 499 were deemed suitable for the analysis. Notably, 78% of respondents were unfamiliar with "BA" before the survey. However, 89.1% expressed interest in adopting daily practices for early breast cancer detection. Following the leaflet exposure, 98.4% of respondents claimed to have understood BA, either completely or partially. The leaflet aided 93.2% of these individuals in differentiating between BA and the traditional BSE method. These outcomes remained consistent across various demographic segments such as occupation, age, and experience with breast cancer care. Conclusions: The study underscores a concerning lack of awareness regarding BA among hospital staff within the surveyed institution. This highlights the need to engage medical professionals in promoting BA within the community. The informational leaflet proved effective in enhancing comprehension of BA across diverse groups, indicating its potential as a widely applicable educational tool. The leaflet facilitated the comprehension of BA among respondents across all demographic groups, indicating its potential for widespread utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: There is a current gap in understanding the costs and healthcare resources used related to breast cancer risk assessment and screening. Risk-stratified breast screening overcomes various limitations of age-based screening, and participants are classified based on personalized differences in breast cancer risk. The overall goal of the PERSPECTIVE I&I project was to inform the implementation of more effective strategies of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening and earlier detection of breast cancer. This study appears to be the first to examine the healthcare utilization and costs stratified by the three breast cancer risk levels, determining the economic burden and resource needs linked with different risk categories. This study demonstrated that despite higher screening-related costs for high-risk individuals, overall healthcare costs were comparable across risk categories. Background: A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to evaluate healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with breast cancer risk assessment and screening and overall costs stratified by risk level, in Ontario, Canada. Methods: From July 2019 to December 2022, 1997 females aged 50 to 70 years consented to risk assessment and received their breast cancer risk level and personalized screening action plan in Ontario. The mean costs for risk-stratified screening-related activities included risk assessment, screening and diagnostic costs. The GETCOST macro from the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) assessed the mean overall healthcare system costs. Results: For the 1997 participants, 83.3%, 14.4% and 2.3% were estimated to be average, higher than average, and high risk, respectively (median age (IQR): 60 [56–64] years). Stratification into the three risk levels was determined using the validated multifactorial CanRisk prediction tool that includes family history information, a polygenic risk score (PRS), breast density and established lifestyle/hormonal risk factors. The mean number of genetic counseling visits, mammograms and MRIs per individual increased with risk level. High-risk participants incurred the highest overall mean risk-stratified screening-related costs in 2022 CAD (±SD) at CAD 905 (±269) followed by CAD 580 (±192) and CAD 521 (±163) for higher-than-average and average-risk participants, respectively. Among the breast screening-related costs, the greatest cost burden across all risk groups was the risk assessment cost, followed by total diagnostic and screening costs. The mean overall healthcare cost per participant (±SD) was the highest for the average risk participants with CAD 6311 (±19,641), followed by higher than average risk with CAD 5391 (±8325) and high risk with CAD 5169 (±7676). Conclusion: Although high-risk participants incurred the highest risk-stratified screening-related costs, their costs for overall healthcare utilization costs were similar to other risk levels. Our study underscored the importance of integrating risk stratification as part of the screening pathway to support breast cancer detection at an earlier and more treatable stage, thereby reducing costs and the overall burden on the healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer is a major health concern worldwide, especially in Vietnam. This study aimed to explore women's motivation for and factors related to breast cancer screening. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in Danang, Vietnam, using a convergent parallel approach. This study utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather the data. The quantitative approach involved surveys to assess motivation levels and related factors, including demographic information and experience with breast cancer screening. In-depth qualitative interviews were used to gain deeper insights into participants' perspectives and experiences related to breast cancer screening. Results: The average motivation score for breast cancer screening was moderate (3.55 ± 0.55). Ethnicity, regular health check-ups, family history of breast cancer, receiving information about breast cancer, and women's health issues have direct relationships with breast cancer screening motivation. According to the qualitative data, three categories emerged: intrinsic motivation, external motivation/internalization, and amotivation. The individual, and sociocultural environmental factors impacted screening motivation. Conclusions: This study highlights the motivations behind breast cancer screening among women. Healthcare providers could use these findings to improve screening policies and guidelines and encourage more women to undergo regular screening, ultimately reducing the incidence of breast cancer in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although artificial intelligence (AI) has potential in the field of screening of breast cancer, there are still issues. It is vital to make sure AI does not overlook cancer or cause needless recalls. The aim of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of indulging AI in combination with one radiologist in the routine double reading of mammography for breast cancer screening. The study prospectively analyzed 32,822 screening mammograms. Reading was performed in a blind-paired style by (i) two radiologists and (ii) one radiologist paired with AI. A heatmap and abnormality scoring percentage were provided by AI for abnormalities detected on mammograms. Negative mammograms and benign-looking lesions that were not biopsied were confirmed by a 2-year follow-up. Results: Double reading by the radiologist and AI detected 1324 cancers (6.4%); on the other side, reading by two radiologists revealed 1293 cancers (6.2%) and presented a relative proportion of 1·02 (p < 0·0001). At the recall stage, suspicion and biopsy recommendation were more presented by the AI plus one radiologist combination than by the two radiologists. The interpretation of the mammogram by AI plus only one radiologist showed a sensitivity of 94.03%, a specificity of 99.75%, a positive predictive value of 96.571%, a negative predictive value of 99.567%, and an accuracy of 99.369% (from 99.252 to 99.472%). The positive likelihood ratio was 387.260, negative likelihood ratio was 0.060, and AUC "area under the curve" was 0.969 (0.967–0.971). Conclusions: AI could be used as an initial reader for the evaluation of screening mammography in routine workflow. Implementation of AI enhanced the opportunity to reduce false negative cases and supported the decision to recall or biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Taiwan implemented the Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Program (CAQIP) in 2010. The program sought to enhance mass breast cancer screening accessibility. This study aimed to examine socioeconomic disparities in outreach screening utilization pre-CAQIP (2005–2009) and post-CAQIP (2010–2014). Method: We conducted a nationwide population-based observational study in Taiwan, analyzing four population databases to evaluate socioeconomic disparities among women aged 50 to 69 years undergoing their first mammography screening pre-CAQIP. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine changes in utilization of outreach screening pre- and post-CAQIP implementation, and to estimate the Slope Index of Inequity (SII) and Relative Index of Inequity (RII) values. Results: Utilization of outreach screening through mobile mammography units (MMUs) increased from 6.12 to 32.87% between the two periods. Following CAQIP, a higher proportion of screened women were older, less educated, and from suburban or rural areas. The SII and RII for age, income, and urbanization levels decreased post-CAQIP. However, regarding education level, SII was − 0.592 and RII was 0.392 in the pre-CAQIP period, increasing to -0.173 and 0.804 post-CAQIP, respectively. Conclusions: Our study observed that utilization of outreach screening through MMUs increased after CAQIP. The MMUs made outreach screening services more accessible in Taiwan. Expanding outreach screening services and educational programs to promote mammography uptake in local communities could help reduce the potential effect of socioeconomic disparities, and thus may enhance early detection of breast cancer. Further study could focus on the accessibility of outreach screening and breast cancer outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We compared the performance of 2 breast cancer screening approaches, automated breast US (ABUS) with same-day mammography (ABUS/MG) and handheld US (HHUS) with same-day mammography (HHUS/MG), in women with dense breasts to better understand the relative usefulness of ABUS and HHUS in a real-world clinical setting. Methods In this institutional review board–approved, retrospective observational study, we evaluated all ABUS/MG and HHUS/MG screening examinations performed at our institution from May 2013 to September 2021. BI-RADS categories, biopsy pathology results, and diagnostic test characteristics (eg, sensitivity, specificity) were compared between the 2 screening approaches using Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 1120 women with dense breasts were included in this study, with 852 undergoing ABUS/MG and 268 undergoing HHUS/MG. The sensitivities of ABUS/MG and HHUS/MG were 100% (5/5) and 75.0% (3/4), respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (P   = .444). The ABUS/MG approach demonstrated a slightly higher specificity (97.4% [825/847] vs 94.3% [249/264]; P  = .028), higher accuracy (97.4% [830/852] vs 94.0% [252/268]; P  = .011), and lower biopsy recommendation rate (3.2% [27/852] vs 6.7% [18/268]; P  = .019) than the HHUS/MG approach in our patient population. Conclusion Our findings suggest that ABUS/MG performs comparably with HHUS/MG as a breast cancer screening approach in women with dense breasts in a real-world clinical setting, with the ABUS/MG approach demonstrating a similar sensitivity and slightly higher specificity than the HHUS/MG approach. Additional variables, such as patient experience and physician time, may help determine which imaging approach to employ in specific clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mammography (MG) has demonstrated its effectiveness in diminishing mortality and advanced-stage breast cancer incidences in breast screening initiatives. Notably, research has accentuated the superior diagnostic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). However, the scope of evidence validating the cost-effectiveness of DBT remains limited, prompting a requisite for more comprehensive investigation. The present study aimed to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DBT plus MG (DBT-MG) compared to MG alone within the framework of Taiwan's National Health Insurance program. Methods: All parameters for the Markov decision tree model, encompassing event probabilities, costs, and utilities (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs), were sourced from reputable literature, expert opinions, and official records. With 10,000 iterations, a 2-year cycle length, a 30-year time horizon, and a 2% annual discount rate, the analysis determined the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two screening methods. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of findings. Results: The ICER of DBT-MG compared to MG was US$5971.5764/QALYs. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$33,004 (Gross Domestic Product of Taiwan in 2021) per QALY, more than 98% of the probabilistic simulations favored adopting DBT-MG versus MG. The one-way sensitivity analysis also shows that the ICER depended heavily on recall rates, biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV2). Conclusion: DBT-MG shows enhanced diagnostic efficacy, potentially diminishing recall costs. While exhibiting a higher biopsy rate, DBT-MG aids in the detection of early-stage breast cancers, reduces recall rates, and exhibits notably superior cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In Yemen, effective early detection and a comprehensive grasp of breast cancer symptoms and risk factors are vital in preventing its potentially deadly spread. However, challenges arise in combating breast cancer in Yemen due to the lack of patient registries, national strategies, and structured cancer treatment plans. Objective This research sought to evaluate the awareness levels of breast cancer and the perceived obstacles to breast cancer screening among adult Yemeni women. Methods A community-based cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted from September 2023 to January 2024 from two teaching and largest hospitals in the capital municipality, Sana’a, Yemen, where 533 women (≥ 18 years old) were conveniently selected in this study. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 23).. The Chi-square test was used to test associations. The factors associated with breast cancer awareness and barriers to breast cancer screening were analyzed separately, using multivariable logistic regression. Results The study revealed that 88.6% of women were familiar with breast cancer, and 61.9% being knowledgeable about screening methods such as clinical breast examination (CBE) or mammography. The primary hindrance to screening (84.1%, n = 53) was the absence of symptoms or pain. The second most common reason for not undergoing screening was a lack of understanding about breast cancer and its treatment (61.9%, n = 39). Conclusion To enhance breast cancer screening rates among Yemeni women consistently, targeted educational programs emphasizing the benefits of early detection and dispelling misconceptions and barriers related to the disease are essential.

Abstract Background Breast Cancer remains among the top five cancers responsible for morbidity and mortality globally. For many years, infectious (communicable) diseases were a primary concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to higher-income countries, where non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were already a major concern. However, starting from the early 2000s, the LMICs including Tanzania has witnessed an epidemiological transition being equally affected by NCDs, and breast cancer, is among the prevalent NCDs. While the evidence is vast on the role of breast cancer screening messages in promoting screening, debunking myths, and addressing barriers to the uptake of breast cancer services, context-specific messages are limited. Amidst the changing technology, growth of social media and cultural dynamics, context-specific breast cancer screening messages are needed. We aimed to analyze the breast cancer screening messages from the experiences of women seeking care at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania. Methods An exploratory qualitative case study adopting in-depth interviews (IDI) and focused group discussion (FGD) was carried out among purposefully selected women aged from 18 years to 65 years seeking care from Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eighteen women participated in the IDIs, and 16 women participated in FGD. Data analysis followed inductive qualitative content analysis. Findings Three main categories emerged: the existence of multiple sources of breast cancer screening messages, the strengths and weaknesses of breast cancer screening messages, and clients’ mixed perceptions of breast cancer screening messages. Conclusion The findings of this study depict that although breast cancer screening promotion messages are regarded as a source of information about cancers, they fall short of completeness and relevance to the otherwise at-risk population and trigger negative perceptions toward screening. Therefore, this study advocates revisiting the breast cancer screening messages, employing participatory approaches to tailor the screening messages and communication media to fit specific audiences. This calls for re-designing both the content of the messages and means of delivery; thus, collaborative efforts are needed.

Abstract Background Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly recommended to assist mammography for women at high risk of breast cancer (BC). This study explored the knowledge, attitude, and willingness toward breast MRI screening among women at high risk of BC. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled women at high risk of BC between August 2022 and January 2023 in Beijing, China. A structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among knowledge, attitude, and willingness. Results A total of 596 questionnaires were collected, and 412 questionnaires (69.13%) were valid. The women’s knowledge and attitude scores were 7.75 ± 2.79 (possible range: 0–12) and 48.53 ± 6.31 (possible range: 13–65). Among the women, 297 (72.09%) were willing to undergo regular breast MRI screening. The SEM showed that knowledge had direct effect on attitude [β = 0.77, 95% CI: (0.57, 0.98), P

Abstract Background Breast cancer is a major health concern worldwide, especially in Vietnam. This study aimed to explore women’s motivation for and factors related to breast cancer screening. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted in Danang, Vietnam, using a convergent parallel approach. This study utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather the data. The quantitative approach involved surveys to assess motivation levels and related factors, including demographic information and experience with breast cancer screening. In-depth qualitative interviews were used to gain deeper insights into participants' perspectives and experiences related to breast cancer screening. Results The average motivation score for breast cancer screening was moderate (3.55 ± 0.55). Ethnicity, regular health check-ups, family history of breast cancer, receiving information about breast cancer, and women’s health issues have direct relationships with breast cancer screening motivation. According to the qualitative data, three categories emerged: intrinsic motivation, external motivation/internalization, and amotivation. The individual, and sociocultural environmental factors impacted screening motivation. Conclusions This study highlights the motivations behind breast cancer screening among women. Healthcare providers could use these findings to improve screening policies and guidelines and encourage more women to undergo regular screening, ultimately reducing the incidence of breast cancer in the community.

Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the recognition and understanding of breast awareness (BA) among hospital staff, a group considered influential in disseminating information about health. Compared to the traditional approach of breast self-examination (BSE), BA has gained prominence as a concept focused on early detection. The study also explored the effectiveness of an informational leaflet in conveying BA concepts. Methods We conducted an online, voluntary, and anonymous questionnaire survey at St. Luke’s International Hospital in Japan, where approximately 1,000 breast cancer surgeries are performed annually. The survey comprised three sections: pre-leaflet questions, the informational leaflet, and post-leaflet questions. Results From a pool of 500 completed questionnaires, 499 were deemed suitable for the analysis. Notably, 78% of respondents were unfamiliar with “BA” before the survey. However, 89.1% expressed interest in adopting daily practices for early breast cancer detection. Following the leaflet exposure, 98.4% of respondents claimed to have understood BA, either completely or partially. The leaflet aided 93.2% of these individuals in differentiating between BA and the traditional BSE method. These outcomes remained consistent across various demographic segments such as occupation, age, and experience with breast cancer care. Conclusions The study underscores a concerning lack of awareness regarding BA among hospital staff within the surveyed institution. This highlights the need to engage medical professionals in promoting BA within the community. The informational leaflet proved effective in enhancing comprehension of BA across diverse groups, indicating its potential as a widely applicable educational tool. The leaflet facilitated the comprehension of BA among respondents across all demographic groups, indicating its potential for widespread utility.

Abstract Background Although artificial intelligence (AI) has potential in the field of screening of breast cancer, there are still issues. It is vital to make sure AI does not overlook cancer or cause needless recalls. The aim of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of indulging AI in combination with one radiologist in the routine double reading of mammography for breast cancer screening. The study prospectively analyzed 32,822 screening mammograms. Reading was performed in a blind-paired style by (i) two radiologists and (ii) one radiologist paired with AI. A heatmap and abnormality scoring percentage were provided by AI for abnormalities detected on mammograms. Negative mammograms and benign-looking lesions that were not biopsied were confirmed by a 2-year follow-up. Results Double reading by the radiologist and AI detected 1324 cancers (6.4%); on the other side, reading by two radiologists revealed 1293 cancers (6.2%) and presented a relative proportion of 1·02 (p

Abstract Background Taiwan implemented the Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Program (CAQIP) in 2010. The program sought to enhance mass breast cancer screening accessibility. This study aimed to examine socioeconomic disparities in outreach screening utilization pre-CAQIP (2005–2009) and post-CAQIP (2010–2014). Method We conducted a nationwide population-based observational study in Taiwan, analyzing four population databases to evaluate socioeconomic disparities among women aged 50 to 69 years undergoing their first mammography screening pre-CAQIP. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine changes in utilization of outreach screening pre- and post-CAQIP implementation, and to estimate the Slope Index of Inequity (SII) and Relative Index of Inequity (RII) values. Results Utilization of outreach screening through mobile mammography units (MMUs) increased from 6.12 to 32.87% between the two periods. Following CAQIP, a higher proportion of screened women were older, less educated, and from suburban or rural areas. The SII and RII for age, income, and urbanization levels decreased post-CAQIP. However, regarding education level, SII was − 0.592 and RII was 0.392 in the pre-CAQIP period, increasing to -0.173 and 0.804 post-CAQIP, respectively. Conclusions Our study observed that utilization of outreach screening through MMUs increased after CAQIP. The MMUs made outreach screening services more accessible in Taiwan. Expanding outreach screening services and educational programs to promote mammography uptake in local communities could help reduce the potential effect of socioeconomic disparities, and thus may enhance early detection of breast cancer. Further study could focus on the accessibility of outreach screening and breast cancer outcomes.

Abstract Background Organized breast cancer screening (BCS) programs are effective measures among women aged 50–69 for preventing the sixth cause of death in Germany. Although the implementation of the national screening program started in 2005, participation rates have not yet reached EU standards. It is unclear which and how sociodemographic factors are related to BCS attendance. This scoping review aims to identify sociodemographic inequalities in BCS attendance among 50-69-year-old women following the implementation of the Organized Screening Program in Germany. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL following the PCC (Population, Concept and Context) criteria. We included primary studies with a quantitative study design and reviews examining BCS attendance among women aged 50–69 with data from 2005 onwards in Germany. Harvest plots depicting effect size direction for the different identified sociodemographic inequalities and last two years or less BCS attendance and lifetime BCS attendance were developed. Results We screened 476 titles and abstracts and 33 full texts. In total, 27 records were analysed, 14 were national reports, and 13 peer-reviewed articles. Eight sociodemographic variables were identified and summarised in harvest plots: age, education, income, migration status, type of district, employment status, partnership cohabitation and health insurance. Older women with lower incomes and migration backgrounds who live in rural areas and lack private insurance respond more favourably to BCS invitations. However, from a lifetime perspective, these associations only hold for migration background, are reversed for income and urban residency, and are complemented by partner cohabitation. Finally, women living in the former East German states of Saxony, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia, as well as in the former West German state of Lower Saxony, showed higher BCS attendance rates in the last two years. Conclusion High-quality research is needed to identify women at higher risk of not attending BCS in Germany to address the existing research’s high heterogeneity, particularly since the overall attendance rate still falls below European standards. Protocol registration https://osf.io/x79tq/ .

Background: Organized breast cancer screening (BCS) programs are effective measures among women aged 50–69 for preventing the sixth cause of death in Germany. Although the implementation of the national screening program started in 2005, participation rates have not yet reached EU standards. It is unclear which and how sociodemographic factors are related to BCS attendance. This scoping review aims to identify sociodemographic inequalities in BCS attendance among 50-69-year-old women following the implementation of the Organized Screening Program in Germany. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL following the PCC (Population, Concept and Context) criteria. We included primary studies with a quantitative study design and reviews examining BCS attendance among women aged 50–69 with data from 2005 onwards in Germany. Harvest plots depicting effect size direction for the different identified sociodemographic inequalities and last two years or less BCS attendance and lifetime BCS attendance were developed. Results: We screened 476 titles and abstracts and 33 full texts. In total, 27 records were analysed, 14 were national reports, and 13 peer-reviewed articles. Eight sociodemographic variables were identified and summarised in harvest plots: age, education, income, migration status, type of district, employment status, partnership cohabitation and health insurance. Older women with lower incomes and migration backgrounds who live in rural areas and lack private insurance respond more favourably to BCS invitations. However, from a lifetime perspective, these associations only hold for migration background, are reversed for income and urban residency, and are complemented by partner cohabitation. Finally, women living in the former East German states of Saxony, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia, as well as in the former West German state of Lower Saxony, showed higher BCS attendance rates in the last two years. Conclusion: High-quality research is needed to identify women at higher risk of not attending BCS in Germany to address the existing research's high heterogeneity, particularly since the overall attendance rate still falls below European standards. Protocol registration: https://osf.io/x79tq/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer is important for personalized screening. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but parenchymal texture patterns offer additional information which cannot be captured by density. We aimed to combine BI-RADS density score 4th Edition and a deep-learning-based texture score to stratify women in screening and compare rates among the combinations. This retrospective study cohort study included 216,564 women from a Danish populations-based screening program. Baseline mammograms were evaluated using BI-RADS density scores (1–4) and a deep-learning texture risk model, with scores categorized into four quartiles (1–4). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for screen-detected, interval, and long-term cancer were adjusted for age, year of screening and screening clinic. Compared with subgroup B1-T1, the highest IRR for screen-detected cancer were within the T4 category (3.44 (95% CI: 2.43–4.82)−4.57 (95% CI: 3.66–5.76)). IRR for interval cancer was highest in the BI-RADS 4 category (95% CI: 5.36 (1.77–13.45)−16.94 (95% CI: 9.93–30.15)). IRR for long-term cancer increased both with increasing BI-RADS and increasing texture reaching 5.15 (4.31–6.16) for the combination of B4-T4 compared with B1-T1. Deep-learning-based texture analysis combined with BI-RADS density categories can reveal subgroups with increased rates beyond what density alone can ascertain, suggesting the potential of combining texture and density to improve risk stratification in breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients use the internet to learn more about health conditions. Non-English–speaking patients may face additional challenges. The quality of online breast cancer information, the most common cancer in women, is uncertain. This study aims to examine the quality of online breast cancer information for English and non-English–speaking patients. Three search engines were queried using the terms: "how to do a breast examination," "when do I need a mammogram," and "what are the treatment options for breast cancer" in English, Spanish, and Chinese. For each language, 60 unique websites were included and classified by type and information source. Two language-fluent reviewers evaluated website quality using the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria (0-4) and the DISCERN tool (1-5), with higher scores representing higher quality. Scores were averaged for each language. Health On the Net code presence was noted. Inter-rater reliability between reviewers was assessed. English and Spanish websites most commonly originated from US sources (92% and 80%, respectively) compared to Chinese websites (33%, P < 0.001). The most common website type was hospital-affiliated for English (43%) and foundation/advocacy for Spanish and Chinese (43% and 45%, respectively). English websites had the highest and Chinese websites the lowest mean the Journal of American Medical Association (2.2 ± 1.4 versus 1.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.002) and DISCERN scores (3.5 ± 0.9 versus 2.3 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). Health On the Net code was present on 16 (8.9%) websites. Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to substantial agreement. The quality of online information on breast cancer across all three languages is poor. Information quality was poorest for Chinese websites. Improvements to enhance the reliability of breast cancer information across languages are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer screening guidelines vary for women at intermediate risk (15%-20% lifetime risk) for developing breast cancer across jurisdictions. Currently available risk assessment models have differing strengths and weaknesses, creating difficulty and ambiguity in selecting the most appropriate model to utilize. Clarifying which model to utilize in individual circumstances may help determine the best screening guidelines to use for each individual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in breast cancer screening in a clinical setting. Materials and methods: All patients who had 3D-ABUS between January 2014 and January 2022 for screening were included in this retrospective study. The images were reported by 1 of 6 breast radiologists based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS). The 3D-ABUS was reviewed together with the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and cancer detection yield were calculated. Results: In total, 3616 studies were performed in 1555 women (breast density C/D 95.5% (n = 3455/3616), breast density A/B 4.0% (n = 144/3616), density unknown (0.5% (n = 17/3616)). A total of 259 lesions were detected on 3D-ABUS (87.6% (n = 227/259) masses and 12.4% (n = 32/259) architectural distortions). The recall rate was 5.2% (n = 188/3616) (CI 4.5–6.0%) with only 36.7% (n = 69/188) cases recalled to another date. Moreover, recall declined over time. There were 3.4% (n = 123/3616) biopsies performed, with 52.8% (n = 65/123) biopsies due to an abnormality detected in 3D-ABUS alone. Ten of 65 lesions were malignant, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 15.4% (n = 10/65) (CI 7.6–26.5%)). The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS is 2.77 per 1000 screening tests (CI 1.30–5.1). Conclusion: The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS in a real clinical screening setting is comparable to the results reported in previous prospective studies, with lower recall and biopsy rates. 3D-ABUS also may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined. Clinical relevance statement: 3D automated breast ultrasound screening performance in a clinical setting is comparable to previous prospective studies, with better recall and biopsy rates. Key Points: • 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal. • The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates. • 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is recognized as a prominent cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally, emphasizing the critical need for early diagnosis resulting improvement in survival rates. Current breast cancer diagnostic procedures depend on manual assessments of pathological images by medical professionals. However, in remote or underserved regions, the scarcity of expert healthcare resources often compromised the diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning holds great promise for early detection, yet existing breast cancer screening algorithms are frequently characterized by significant computational demands, rendering them unsuitable for deployment on low-processing-power mobile devices. In this paper, a real-time automated system "Auto-BCS" is introduced that significantly enhances the efficiency of early breast cancer screening. The system is structured into three distinct phases. In the initial phase, images undergo a pre-processing stage aimed at noise reduction. Subsequently, feature extraction is carried out using a lightweight and optimized deep learning model followed by extreme gradient boosting classifier, strategically employed to optimize the overall performance and prevent overfitting in the deep learning model. The system's performance is gauged through essential metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and inference time. Comparative evaluations against state-of-the-art algorithms affirm that Auto-BCS outperforms existing models, excelling in both efficiency and processing speed. Computational efficiency is prioritized by Auto-BCS, making it particularly adaptable to low-processing-power mobile devices. Comparative assessments confirm the superior performance of Auto-BCS, signifying its potential to advance breast cancer screening technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: At mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y. Methods: We invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women's stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data. Results: A total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%–98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind. Conclusion: In our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Highlights: Almost all women of prescreening age (44–49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y. Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative. Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort. Methods: Women aged 40–60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression. Results: In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12–0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups. Conclusion: Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection presents a global health challenge, with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite remarkable progress in treatment options, achieving elimination targets by 2030, as set by the World Health Organization, remains elusive. Our study aimed to address this gap by integrating HCV screening into a national breast cancer screening program. Between March 2022 and March 2023, a prospective cross‐sectional multicenter study was conducted in four radiology centers in Montpellier, France. We proposed HCV screening to consecutive women undergoing mammography, targeting 1,500 participants aged 50–74 years. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HCV antibodies (HCV Ab) was performed on capillary whole blood, with positive cases undergoing serological and RNA confirmation. Participants also completed a questionnaire on demographic data and risk factors. Acceptance rates, HCV prevalence, and linkage to care were assessed. The acceptance rate for this integrated screening approach was 82.4%. Notably, the seroprevalence of HCV was found to be 0.65%. Linkage to care was prompt, and the cascade of care demonstrated successful treatment outcomes. Importantly, the majority of detected infections were successfully resolved. These findings underscore the feasibility and acceptability of integrating HCV screening with breast cancer screening programs providing updated prevalence data and valuable insights for refining future screening strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the feasibility of standardized, prospective assignment of initial method of detection (MOD) of breast cancer by radiologists in diverse practice settings. This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed the rate of assignment of MOD in four geographically varied health systems. A universal protocol for basic MOD assignment was agreed upon by the authors before start of the pilot study. Radiologists at each site were instructed how to assign MOD. Charts were then reviewed to determine the frequency and accuracy of MOD assignment for all cases subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer. When available, data regarding frequency of tumor registry abstraction were also reviewed for frequency and accuracy. A total of 2,328 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer were evaluated across the sites over the study period. Of these patients, initial MOD was prospectively assigned by the radiologist in 94% of cases. Of the cases in which MOD was assigned, retrospective review confirmed accurate assignment in 96% of cases. Prospective, standardized assignment of initial MOD of breast cancer is feasible across different practice sites and can be accurately captured in tumor registries. Standard collection of MOD would provide critical data about the impact of screening mammography in the United States. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The use of artificial intelligence has potential in assisting many aspects of imaging interpretation. We undertook a prospective service evaluation from March to October 2022 of Mammography Intelligent Assessment (MIA) operating "silently" within our Breast Screening Service, with a view to establishing its performance in the local population and setting. This evaluation addressed the performance of standalone MIA vs conventional double human reading of mammograms. Methods MIA analyzed 8779 screening events over an 8-month period. The MIA outcome did not influence the decisions made on the clinical pathway. Cases were reviewed approximately 6 weeks after the screen reading decision when human reading and/or MIA indicated a recall. Results There were 146 women with positive concordance between human reading and MIA (human reader and MIA recalled) in whom 58 breast cancers were detected. There were 270 women with negative discordance (MIA no recall, human reader recall) for whom 19 breast cancers and 1 breast lymphoma were detected, with 1 cancer being an incidental finding at assessment. Six hundred and four women had positive discordance (MIA recall, human reader no recall) in whom 2 breast cancers were detected at review. The breast cancers demonstrated a wide spectrum of mammographic features, sites, sizes, and pathologies, with no statistically significant difference in features between the negative discordant and positive concordant cases. Conclusion Of 79 breast cancers identified by human readers, 18 were not identified by MIA, and these had no specific features or site to suggest a systematic error for MIA analysis of 2D screening mammograms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background High mammographic density increases breast cancer risk and reduces mammographic sensitivity. We reviewed evidence on accuracy of supplemental MRI for women with dense breasts at average or increased risk. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched 1995-2022. Articles were included if women received breast MRI following 2D or tomosynthesis mammography. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Analysis used independent studies from the articles. Fixed-effect meta-analytic summaries were estimated for predefined groups (PROSPERO: 230277). Results Eighteen primary research articles (24 studies) were identified in women aged 19-87 years. Breast density was heterogeneously or extremely dense (BI-RADS C/D) in 15/18 articles and extremely dense (BI-RADS D) in 3/18 articles. Twelve of 18 articles reported on increased-risk populations. Following 21 440 negative mammographic examinations, 288/320 cancers were detected by MRI. Substantial variation was observed between studies in MRI cancer detection rate, partly associated with prevalent vs incident MRI exams (prevalent: 16.6/1000 exams, 12 studies; incident: 6.8/1000 exams, 7 studies). MRI had high sensitivity for mammographically occult cancer (20 studies with at least 1-year follow-up). In 5/18 articles with sufficient data to estimate relative MRI detection rate, approximately 2 in 3 cancers were detected by MRI (66.3%, 95% CI, 56.3%-75.5%) but not mammography. Positive predictive value was higher for more recent studies. Risk of bias was low in most studies. Conclusion Supplemental breast MRI following negative mammography in women with dense breasts has breast cancer detection rates of ~16.6/1000 at prevalent and ~6.8/1000 at incident MRI exams, considering both high and average risk settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the most widespread cancers among the female population around the world and is curable if diagnosed in an early stage. Consequently, breast cancer screening imaging techniques have greatly evolved and adjusted over the last decades. Alongside mammography, sonoelastography became an important tool for breast cancer detection. However, sonoelastography still has its limitations, namely, there is still a high occurrence of false positive results in the BIRADS 4 category. The aim of our study is to identify potential false positive predictors and to ascertain the factors influencing the quality of strain ultrasound elastography for the evaluation of suspicious solid breast lesions categorized as BIRADS 4B, 4C, and 5. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a single private medical center in Timisoara between January 2017 and January 2022 analyzing 1625 solid breast lesions by the sonoelastography strain using a standardized BIRADS-US lexicon. Results: Our study showed that most sonoelastography factors linked to incorrect and overdiagnosis were due to a nodule dimension (OR = 1.02 per unit increase), posterior acoustic shadowing (OR = 12.26), reactive adenopathy (OR = 6.35), and an increased TES score (TES3 OR = 6.60; TES4 OR = 23.02; TES5 OR = 108.24). Regarding patient characteristics, age (OR = 1.09 per unit increase), BMI, (OR = 1.09 per unit increase), and breastfeeding history (OR = 3.00) were observed to increase the likelihood of false positive results. On the other hand, the nodules less likely to be part of the false positive group exhibited the following characteristics: a regular shape (OR = 0.27), homogenous consistency (OR = 0.42), and avascularity (OR = 0.22). Conclusions: Older age, high BMI, patients with a breastfeeding history, and those who exhibit the following specific nodule characteristics were most often linked to false positive results: large tumors with posterior acoustic shadowing and high elasticity scores, accompanied by reactive adenopathy. On the other hand, homogenous, avascular nodules with regular shapes were less likely to be misdiagnosed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Early cancer detection is crucial for favorable patient outcomes, with mammography playing a central role in breast cancer detection. However, challenges persist, such as limited sensitivity in dense breast tissue and low specificity leading to excessive invasive testing. Leveraging the distinct biological characteristics of malignant tumors, we employed high-sensitivity thermal imaging to identify temperature changes associated with cancer. This innovative approach integrates a novel imaging technique and a physics-based prediction model to accurately ascertain the presence of breast cancer, regardless of size, location, and breast density. Our goal is to develop this technique as a complementary tool to mammography for widespread screening and as a cost-effective, stand-alone method for specific populations underserved by mammography. Cancer is characterized by increased metabolic activity and vascularity, leading to temperature changes in cancerous tissues compared to normal cells. This study focused on patients with abnormal mammogram findings or a clinical suspicion of breast cancer, exclusively those confirmed by biopsy. Utilizing an ultra-high sensitivity thermal camera and prone patient positioning, we measured surface temperatures integrated with an inverse modeling technique based on heat transfer principles to predict malignant breast lesions. Involving 25 breast tumors, our technique accurately predicted all tumors, with maximum errors below 5 mm in size and less than 1 cm in tumor location. Predictive efficacy was unaffected by tumor size, location, or breast density, with no aberrant predictions in the contralateral normal breast. Infrared temperature profiles and inverse modeling using both techniques successfully predicted breast cancer, highlighting its potential in breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. There are observed disparities in patients with disability as compared to those without disability, which leads to poor BC screening attendance, thereby worsening disease management. Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate if there are disparities in screening rates in women with disability as compared to those without disability, as well as the different factors that pose barriers to patients with disability for enrolment in BC screening programs. Method: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed published articles between 2008 and 2023, which assessed different factors that contributed to poor attendance in BC screening programs held across different countries. Detailed study characteristics were obtained, and methodological quality assessment was performed on the individual studies included in this review. Result: A total of fifty-three articles were identified as eligible studies based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included 7,252,913 patients diagnosed with BC (913,902 patients with disability/6,339,011 patients without disability). The results revealed there are demographic, clinical, financial, and service-related barriers that contributed to lower screening rates in disabled patients as compared to non-disabled. Patient age is the most common factor, with the highest effect observed for 80 years (vs. 30–44 years) [odds ratio (OR) = 13.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.27–23.47), p < 0.0001], followed by race/ethnicity for Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic white) [OR = 9.5 (95%CI = 1.0–91.9), p < 0.05]. Additionally, patients with multiple disabilities had the highest rate of dropouts [OR = 27.4 (95%CI = 21.5–33.3)]. Other factors like education, income, marital status, and insurance coverage were essential barriers in screening programs. Conclusions: This study presents a holistic view of all barriers to poor BC screening attendance in disabled patients, thereby exacerbating health inequalities. A standardized approach to overcome the identified barriers and the need for a tailored guideline, especially for disability groups, is inevitable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The current approach to breast cancer screening, which is based on a person's age, overlooks individual-level differences in breast cancer risk. As a result, many people are over- or under-screened according to their actual risk of breast cancer. Risk-stratified breast screening may overcome the limitations of age-based screening, but there are still many knowledge gaps regarding how best to implement it in the population setting. This study will generate the first Canadian evidence on the adoption of breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting, to support the future implementation of risk-stratified breast cancer screening. This study demonstrated that, while risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level is feasible, an equity lens must be considered in implementation to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened. Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40–69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. The adoption of multifactorial risk assessment, the effectiveness of methods for collecting risk factor information and the costs of risk assessment were examined. Associations between participant characteristics and study sites, as well as data collection methods, were assessed using logistic regression; all p-values are two-sided. Of the 4246 participants recruited, 88.4% completed a risk assessment, with 79.8%, 15.7% and 4.4% estimated at average, higher than average and high risk, respectively. The total per-participant cost for risk assessment was CAD 315. Participants who chose to provide risk factor information on paper/telephone (27.2%) vs. online were more likely to be older (p = 0.021), not born in Canada (p = 0.043), visible minorities (p = 0.01) and have a lower attained education (p < 0.0001) and perceived fair/poor health (p < 0.001). The 34.4% of participants requiring risk factor verification for missing/unusual values were more likely to be visible minorities (p = 0.009) and have a lower attained education (p ≤ 0.006). This study demonstrates the feasibility of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level. Implementation should incorporate an equity lens to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyze discordant and false-negatives of double reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus digital mammography (DM) including reading times in the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST), and reclassify these in a retrospective reader study as missed, minimal sign, or true-negatives. Methods: The prospective OTST comparing double reading DBT vs. DM had paired design with four parallel arms: DM, DM + computer aided detection, DBT + DM, and DBT + synthetic mammography. Eight radiologists interpreted images in batches using a 5-point scale. Reading time was automatically recorded. A retrospective reader study including four radiologists classified screen-detected cancers with at least one false-negative score and screening examinations of interval cancers as negative, non-specific minimal sign, significant minimal sign, and missed; the two latter groups are defined "actionable." Statistics included chi-square, Fisher's exact, McNemar's, and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: Discordant rate (cancer missed by one reader) for screen-detected cancers was overall comparable (DBT (31% [71/227]) and DM (30% [52/175]), p =.81), significantly lower at DBT for spiculated cancers (DBT, 19% [20/106] vs. DM, 36% [38/106], p =.003), but high (28/49 = 57%, p = 0.001) for DBT-only detected spiculated cancers. Reading time and sensitivity varied among readers. False-negative DBT-only detected spiculated cancers had shorter reading time than true-negatives in 46% (13/28). Retrospective evaluation classified the following DBT exams "actionable": three missed by both readers, 95% (39/41) of discordant cancers detected by both modes, all 30 discordant DBT-only cancers, 25% (13/51) of interval cancers. Conclusions: Discordant rate was overall comparable for DBT and DM, significantly lower at DBT for spiculated cancers, but high for DBT-only detected spiculated lesions. Most false-negative screen-detected DBT were classified as "actionable." Clinical relevance statement: Retrospective evaluation of false-negative interpretations from the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial shows that most discordant and several interval cancers could have been detected at screening. This underlines the potential for modern AI-based reading aids and triage, as high-volume screening is a demanding task. Key Points: • Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening is more sensitive and has higher specificity compared to digital mammography screening, but high-volume DBT screening is a demanding task which can result in high discordance rate among readers. • Independent double reading DBT screening had overall comparable discordance rate as digital mammography, lower for spiculated masses seen on both modalities, and higher for small spiculated cancer seen only on DBT. • Almost all discordant digital breast tomosynthesis-detected cancers (72 of 74) and 25% (13 of 51) of the interval cancers in the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial were retrospectively classified as actionable and could have been detected by the readers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the most widespread neoplasm among women and early detection of this disease is critical. Deep learning techniques have become of great interest to improve diagnostic performance. However, distinguishing between malignant and benign masses in whole mammograms poses a challenge, as they appear nearly identical to an untrained eye, and the region of interest (ROI) constitutes only a small fraction of the entire image. In this paper, we propose a framework, parameterized hypercomplex attention maps (PHAM), to overcome these problems. Specifically, we deploy an augmentation step based on computing attention maps. Then, the attention maps are used to condition the classification step by constructing a multi-dimensional input comprised of the original breast cancer image and the corresponding attention map. In this step, a parameterized hypercomplex neural network (PHNN) is employed to perform breast cancer classification. The framework offers two main advantages. First, attention maps provide critical information regarding the ROI and allow the neural model to concentrate on it. Second, the hypercomplex architecture has the ability to model local relations between input dimensions thanks to hypercomplex algebra rules, thus properly exploiting the information provided by the attention map. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework on both mammography images as well as histopathological ones. We surpass attention-based state-of-the-art networks and the real-valued counterpart of our approach. The code of our work is available at https://github.com/ispamm/AttentionBCS. • Deep learning enhances breast cancer diagnosis. • Mammogram mass discrimination is challenging. • Attention maps can highlight the small ROI. • Attention map-augmentation can condition a hypercomplex network to improve performance. • Hypercomplex algebra exploits the additional information provided by the attention map. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantitative transmission (QT) imaging is an emerging volumetric ultrasound modality for women too young for mammography. QT images tissue without overlap seen in mammography, thereby can potentially improve breast mass detection and characterization and noncancer recall. We compared radiologists' interpretation of QT vs digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with a multireader multicase observer performance study. Study subjects received screening DBT and QT scans in HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective case-collection studies at four clinical sites. Twenty-four Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists interpreted 177 cases (66 with cancer, atypia, or solid mass and 111 normal or with nonsolid benign abnormality), first QT, then 2 weeks later DBT synthesized 2D-views. Readers reported up to three findings per case and for each finding a recall or no recall decision and confidence of that decision. The study hypothesis was area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of QT was noninferior to DBT. Sensitivity and specificity were also compared. AUC of QT (0.746 ± 0.028, mean ± SD) was noninferior to DBT (0.700 ± 0.028) for AUC difference margin of −0.05 (P <.05). AUC difference was 0.046 ± 0.028 (95% CI: [−0.008, 0.101]). Sensitivity was 70.6 ± 7.2% for QT and 85.2 ± 6.4% for DBT, specificity was 60.1 ± 12.3% vs 37.2 ± 11.0%, and both differences were statistically significant. Of a total of 21 cases of cysts, readers recommended recall, on average, in 1.1 ± 1.4 cases with QT, but not with DBT, and 10.6 ± 2.2 cases with DBT, but not with QT. QT can be a potential alternative to mammography for breast cancer screening of women too young to undergo mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Magyar Nőorvosok Lapja is the property of Hungarian Society of Obsterics & Gynaecology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background and Aim: Test‐sets are standardized assessments used to evaluate reader performance in breast screening. Understanding how test‐set results affect real‐world performance can help refine their use as a quality improvement tool. The aim of this study is to explore if mammographic test‐set results could identify breast‐screening readers who improved their cancer detection in association with test‐set training. Methods: Test‐set results of 41 participants were linked to their annual cancer detection rate change in two periods oriented around their first test‐set participation year. Correlation tests and a multiple linear regression model investigated the relationship between each metric in the test‐set results and the change in detection rates. Additionally, participants were divided based on their improvement status between the two periods, and Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine if the subgroups differed in their test‐set metrics. Results: Test‐set records indicated multiple significant correlations with the change in breast cancer detection rate: a moderate positive correlation with sensitivity (0.688, p < 0.001), a moderate negative correlation with specificity (−0.528, p < 0.001), and a low to moderate positive correlation with lesion sensitivity (0.469, p = 0.002), and the number of years screen‐reading mammograms (0.365, p = 0.02). In addition, the overall regression was statistically significant (F (2,38) = 18.456 p < 0.001), with an R² of 0.493 (adjusted R² = 0.466) based on sensitivity (F = 27.132, p < 0.001) and specificity (F = 9.78, p = 0.003). Subgrouping the cohort based on the change in cancer detection indicated that the improved group is significantly higher in sensitivity (p < 0.001) and lesion sensitivity (p = 0.02) but lower in specificity (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity are the strongest test‐set performance measures to predict the change in breast cancer detection in real‐world breast screening settings following test‐set participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: When multiple surveillance mammograms are performed within an annual interval, the current guidance for one-year follow-up to determine breast cancer status results in shared follow-up periods in which a single breast cancer diagnosis can be attributed to multiple preceding examinations, posing a challenge for standardized performance assessment. We assessed the impact of using follow-up periods that eliminate the artifactual inflation of second breast cancer diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated surveillance mammograms from 2007-2016 in women with treated breast cancer linked with tumor registry and pathology outcomes. Second breast cancers included ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer diagnosed during one-year follow-up. The cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, sensitivity, and specificity were compared using different follow-up periods: standard one-year follow-up per the American College of Radiology versus follow-up that was shortened at the next surveillance mammogram if less than one year (truncated follow-up). Performance measures were calculated overall and by indication (screening, evaluation for breast problem, and short interval follow-up). RESULTS: Of 117971 surveillance mammograms, 20% (n = 23533) were followed by another surveillance mammogram within one year. Standard follow-up identified 1597 mammograms that were associated with second breast cancers. With truncated follow-up, the breast cancer status of 179 mammograms (11.2%) was revised, resulting in 1418 mammograms associated with unique second breast cancers. The interval cancer rate decreased with truncated versus standard follow-up (3.6 versus 4.9 per 1000 mammograms, respectively), with a difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1). The overall sensitivity increased to 70.4% from 63.7%, for the truncated versus standard follow-up, with a difference (95% CI) of 6.6% (5.6%, 7.7%). The specificity remained stable at 98.1%. CONCLUSION: Truncated follow-up, if less than one year to the next surveillance mammogram, enabled second breast cancers to be associated with a single preceding mammogram and resulted in more accurate estimates of diagnostic performance for national benchmarks.

Introduction: In recent decades, attendance to organized breast cancer screening has been decreasing in European countries. This could be partly due to an increase in the use of opportunistic screening. The aim of this study was to assess the coverage of imaging in and outside the screening program in Finland during the period of 1999–2018. We also compared the usage of imaging services across sociodemographic groups in the more recent years (2017–2018). Methods: Our initial data consisted of 1,159,000 screening-target-aged women (50–69 years) in 1999–2018 and 1,849,000 women aged 30–89 years in 2017–2018. Data on organized breast cancer screening program was drawn from the Finnish Cancer Registry and supplemented with comprehensive individual data on mammograms and ultrasounds performed outside the program. Results: Among the screening-aged women (50–69), a clear decline in the overall imaging coverage was observed during the study period (from 89 to 85%). The use of outside imaging increased slightly but not enough to compensate for the overall decrease. There were large differences in coverages between sociodemographic groups. Compared to manual workers and the unemployed, upper-level employees were around two times more active in using outside imaging (8.2% vs. 3.6% and 4.3%, respectively). Interpretation: Overall breast imaging coverage has slowly decreased during the 2000s, while outside imaging has increased slightly. The coverage of imaging in and outside the program largely followed the same trends, with the highest usage concentrating on higher socioeconomical groups, native speakers and highly educated women.

Background: The breast cancer burden on the South African healthcare system is severe, with rural South African women often diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. South Africa’s rural areas are classified as low-resource settings with limited medical services and infrastructure. The impact of breast cancer on rural communities in South Africa requires ongoing research to better understand the severity of this disease among one of the most vulnerable populations. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the barriers and enablers of breast cancer screening among rural South African women. Method: An exploratory qualitative study was utilised. A semi-structured interview was conducted with 22 rural South African women. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. This study utilised the care-seeking behaviour theory as its theoretical framework. Results: Participants identified many barriers to breast cancer screening, including individual affordability, transportation, rural services, infrastructure, health professional behaviour, and the lack of educational materials. Several factors are suggested to enable the screening of breast cancer in rural South Africa, including breast cancer campaigns, health education, the involvement of key stakeholders, and promotional materials. Conclusion: Despite the many barriers to breast cancer screening among rural South African women, there is still hope in implementing the various promotional tools outlined in this study and ensuring that breast self-examination is an alternative, affordable screening method. Contribution: The purpose of this article is to contribute to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3, which focusses reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases, including cancer.