Search

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Known prognostic features of GISTs include tumor mitotic rate, size, and location, yet one common feature of primary GISTs for which prognostic significance is unknown, is mucosal ulceration. This study aims to investigate the significance of mucosal ulceration in GISTs.A retrospective study was conducted of 513 patients at a tertiary referral center with a suspected or documented diagnosis of primary GIST between the years of 2000 and 2020. Ulceration was confirmed by definitive documentation in the endoscopic or histopathologic report. The significance of ulceration in GIST was compared to other prognostic factors.Of the 513 patients reviewed, 310 primary GIST patients with known ulceration and disease status were identified. Of those, 27.4% (n = 85) demonstrated mucosal ulceration. Mucosal ulceration in GISTs is associated with GI bleeding, mitotic rate, tumor size, and exon 11 mutations. After a median follow-up of 35.4 (interquartile range = 17.1-62.2) mo, patients with ulcerated GISTs experienced higher rates of tumor progression (40.0% versus 14.2%, P 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, ulceration of GISTs was highly associated with disease progression (P 0.0001) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.4 [1.2-4.7], P = 0.01).Mucosal ulceration in GISTs is associated with GI bleeding, mitotic rate, tumor size, and exon 11 mutations. Overall, ulceration in GISTs is associated with elevated risk of tumor progression and is an independent prognostic factor. In multivariate analysis, ulceration in GIST remains an independent risk factor for disease progression.

Summary A recent randomized phase II study of sunitinib or cediranib in alveolar soft part sarcoma established benchmark activity for commonly used tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The impact of TKIs, as well as immunotherapy, has redefined treatment paradigms and greatly improved outcomes for this historically dismal sarcoma. See related article by Nguyen et al., p. 1200

Liposarcoma is the most commonly occurring soft tissue sarcoma and is frequently characterized by amplification of chromosome region 12q13-15 harboring the oncogenes MDM2 and CDK4. This unique genetic profile makes liposarcoma an attractive candidate for targeted therapeutics. While CDK4/6 inhibitors are currently employed for treatment of several cancers, MDM2 inhibitors have yet to attain clinical approval. Here, we report the molecular characterization of the response of liposarcoma to the MDM2 inhibitor nutlin-3. Treatment with nutlin-3 led to upregulation of two nodes of the proteostasis network: the ribosome and the proteasome. CRISPR/Cas9 was used to perform a genome-wide loss of function screen that identified PSMD9, which encodes a proteasome subunit, as a regulator of response to nutlin-3. Accordingly, pharmacological studies with a panel of proteasome inhibitors revealed strong combinatorial induction of apoptosis with nutlin-3. Mechanistic studies identified activation of the ATF4/CHOP stress response axis as a potential node of interaction between nutlin-3 and the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing experiments confirmed that ATF4, CHOP, and the BH3-only protein, NOXA, are all required for nutlin-3 and carfilzomib-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, activation of the unfolded protein response using tunicamycin and thapsigargin was sufficient to activate the ATF4/CHOP stress response axis and sensitize to nutlin-3. Finally, cell line and patient-derived xenograft models demonstrated combinatorial effects of treatment with idasanutlin and carfilzomib on liposarcoma growth in vivo. Together, these data indicate that targeting of the proteasome could improve the efficacy of MDM2 inhibitors in liposarcoma.

Purpose: Determine whether specific CTNNB1 or APC mutations in patients with desmoid tumor were associated with differences in clinical responses to systemic treatments. Experimental Design: We established a multi-institutional dataset of previously treated patients with desmoid tumor across four U.S. sarcoma centers, including demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical and radiographic responses. CTNNB1 or APC mutation status was determined from prior pathology records, or archival tissue was requested and analyzed by Sanger sequencing and/or next-generation sequencing. Evaluable patients with mutation results were analyzed to determine clinical progression-free survival (cPFS), RECIST 1.1 PFS (rPFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to identify differences in cPFS, rPFS, TTNT, and OS by mutation subtype, desmoid tumor location, and treatment regimen. Results: A total of 259 evaluable patients were analyzed for at least one of the survival outcomes, with 177 patients having mutation data. First- and second-line cPFS, rPFS, and TTNT were not significantly affected by mutation subtype; however, APC-mutant desmoid tumors demonstrated nonstatistically significant inferior outcomes. Extremity/trunk desmoid tumor location and treatment with doxorubicin-based, methotrexate/vinca alkaloids and sorafenib regimens were associated with better clinical outcomes compared with surgery or “other” therapies, including estrogen-receptor blockade and imatinib. OS was significantly worse with APC or CTNNB1 negative/other mutations. Conclusions: Mutation subtype did not affect responses to specific systemic therapies. APC mutations and nonextremity desmoid tumor locations remain prognostic for worse outcomes, and earlier initiation of systemic therapy for these higher-risk desmoid tumors should be prospectively evaluated. See related commentary by Greene and Van Tine, p. 3911

Supplementary Data from Systemic Chemotherapies Retain Antitumor Activity in Desmoid Tumors Independent of Specific Mutations in CTNNB1 or APC: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

Purpose:Determine whether specific CTNNB1 or APC mutations in patients with desmoid tumor were associated with differences in clinical responses to systemic treatments.Experimental Design:We established a multi-institutional dataset of previously treated patients with desmoid tumor across four U.S. sarcoma centers, including demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical and radiographic responses. CTNNB1 or APC mutation status was determined from prior pathology records, or archival tissue was requested and analyzed by Sanger sequencing and/or next-generation sequencing. Evaluable patients with mutation results were analyzed to determine clinical progression-free survival (cPFS), RECIST 1.1 PFS (rPFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to identify differences in cPFS, rPFS, TTNT, and OS by mutation subtype, desmoid tumor location, and treatment regimen.Results:A total of 259 evaluable patients were analyzed for at least one of the survival outcomes, with 177 patients having mutation data. First- and second-line cPFS, rPFS, and TTNT were not significantly affected by mutation subtype; however, APC-mutant desmoid tumors demonstrated nonstatistically significant inferior outcomes. Extremity/trunk desmoid tumor location and treatment with doxorubicin-based, methotrexate/vinca alkaloids and sorafenib regimens were associated with better clinical outcomes compared with surgery or “other” therapies, including estrogen-receptor blockade and imatinib. OS was significantly worse with APC or CTNNB1 negative/other mutations.Conclusions:Mutation subtype did not affect responses to specific systemic therapies. APC mutations and nonextremity desmoid tumor locations remain prognostic for worse outcomes, and earlier initiation of systemic therapy for these higher-risk desmoid tumors should be prospectively evaluated.See related commentary by Greene and Van Tine, p. 3911

Supplementary Figure from Systemic Chemotherapies Retain Antitumor Activity in Desmoid Tumors Independent of Specific Mutations in CTNNB1 or APC: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

Denosumab is an established targeted systemic therapy for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). We sought to determine whether treatment response could be quantified from radiomics analysis of radiographs taken longitudinally during treatment. Pre- and post-treatment radiographs of 10 GCTB tumors from 10 patients demonstrating histologic response after treatment with denosumab were analyzed. Intensity- and texture-based radiomics features for each manually segmented tumor were calculated. Radiomics features were compared pre- and post-treatment in tumors. Mean intensity (p = 0.033) significantly increased while skewness (p = 0.028) significantly decreased after treatment. Post-treatment increases in fractal dimensions (p = 0.057) and abundance (p = 0.065) approached significance. A potential linear correlation in mean (p = 0.005; ΔMean = 0.022 * duration − 0.026) with treatment duration was observed. Radiomics analysis of plain radiographs quantifies time-dependent matrix mineralization and trabecular reconstitution that mark positive response of giant cell tumors of bone to denosumab.

Background: In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS. Methods: Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021). Results: Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice. Conclusions: These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Early experiences with modern immunotherapy have been disappointing in trials of unselected sarcoma subtypes. However, remarkable efficacy has been observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a subset of patients, with the most promising outcomes to date in alveolar soft part sarcoma, cutaneous angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (dLPS). Adoptive cellular therapies targeting cancer testis antigens have shown promising activity, but only synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcomas reliably express these targets. The majority of sarcomas are immunologically "cold" with sparse immune infiltration, which may explain the poor response to immunotherapy. Current immunotherapy trials for sarcomas explore combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors to overcome immune evasion and novel targets in adoptive cellular therapies. The role of tertiary lymphoid structures, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and tumor lymphocytes as biomarkers for response are areas of active investigation. In this review, we highlight prior and ongoing clinical efforts to improve outcomes with immunotherapy and discuss the current state of understanding for biomarkers to select patients most likely to benefit from this approach.

Giant cell tumor of bone is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing neoplasm. Evidence suggests that the neoplastic cells may be osteoblastic in differentiation. Standard treatment is surgical removal, but medical therapy with denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ ligand, has become a component of patient management in select cases. Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone (DT-GCTB) shows drastic morphologic changes including the presence of abundant bone. To further determine the relationship of the neoplastic cells to osteoblast phenotype, we performed a morphologic and immunohistochemical study on a series of DT-GCTB. Cases of DT-GCTB were retrieved from surgical pathology files, available slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W, SATB2, and p63 was performed. The cohort included 31 tumors from 30 patients (2:3 male:female), ages 15 to 73 years (median=36 y). The morphology of post-denosumab-treated tumors ranged from tumors composed of an abundant bone matrix with few spindle cells to spindle cell-predominant tumors. Five had focal residual classic CGTB, and 2 manifested mild nuclear atypia. The majority expressed all markers: 86.2% for H3.3 G34W, 96.7% for SATB2, and 100% for p63. All markers stained the various tumor components including spindle cells and the cells on the surface of and within the treated tumor bone matrix. Most markers were also positive in reactive-appearing woven bone adjacent to tumor: 84.6% for H3.3 G34W, 100% for SATB2, and 68% for p63. These findings suggest that denosumab treatment of giant cell tumor of bone results in osteoblastic differentiation with bone production.

LBA8 Background: BOT promotes optimized T cell priming, activation and memory formation by strengthening antigen presenting cell/T cell co-engagement. As an Fc-enhanced next-generation anti–CTLA-4 antibody, BOT also promotes intratumoral regulatory T cell depletion and reduces complement fixation. We present results from patients with MSS CRC treated with BOT + BAL in an expanded phase 1a/1b study; NCT03860272. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic MSS CRC received BOT 1 or 2 mg/kg every 6 weeks (Q6W) + BAL 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Crossover from monotherapy to combination therapy was permitted (rescue) as well as fixed-dosing (150 mg BOT Q6W + 450 mg BAL every 3 weeks). Results: Fifty-nine combination pts were evaluable for efficacy/safety (treated as of 19 May 2022 with ≥1 Q6W imaging assessment), including one rescue and one fixed-dose pt. Median pt age was 57 (range, 25-83), 58% were female, and 76% received at least three prior lines of therapy including prior immunotherapy (34%). Median follow-up was 6.4 months (range, 1.6-29.5). In all pts, objective response rate (ORR) was 22% (95% CI, 12-35), disease control rate (DCR) was 73% (95% CI, 60-84), and median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR), with 9/13 responses ongoing. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 61% (95% CI, 42-75), with median OS NR. Of the 13 responders, 9 had RAS mutations (7 KRAS, 2 NRAS), 0 had BRAF mutations, 0/10 had a TMB of ≥10 mutations/Mb, and 1/7 was PD-L1 positive (≥1% combined positive score). A subgroup analysis was conducted by the dose of BOT received . In 1 mg/kg pts (n=8), ORR was 38% (3/8; 95% CI, 9-76) and DCR was 100% (8/8; 95% CI, 63-100); in 2 mg/kg pts (n=50), ORR was 20% (10/50; 95% CI, 10-34) and DCR was 70% (35/50; 95% CI, 55-82). All grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 88% of pts, including grade 3 in 32%, and grade 4 in 2% of pts. Diarrhea/colitis was the only grade 3/4 TRAE occurring in more than three pts (15% grade 3, 2% grade 4). The most common grade 3 TRAEs outside of diarrhea/colitis were fatigue (5%) and pyrexia (5%). There were no grade 5 TRAEs reported. Fifteen percent of pts had a TRAE leading to discontinuation of BOT alone and 12% had a TRAE leading to discontinuation of both BOT + BAL. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated metastatic MSS CRC pts, BOT + BAL continues to demonstrate promising clinical activity with durable responses and was well tolerated with no new immune-mediated safety signals. A larger pt set, analyses by subgroup, and additional translational data will be presented at the meeting. A randomized phase 2 trial in MSS CRC pts is enrolling (NCT05608044). Clinical trial information: NCT03860272 .

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of over 150 mesenchymal neoplasms of bone and soft tissue. Clinical prognosis remains poor in the metastatic and refractory setting, despite treatment with traditional chemotherapies. A subset of sarcoma patients can exhibit remarkable responses to novel immune therapies; however, most patients will not respond. Emerging data from genetic and transcriptomic datasets suggests that patients who are resistant to checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy may have low expression of immune-related genes, suggesting that the sarcoma was not sufficiently immunogenic to trigger or maintain an immune response to generate tumor-specific immune effector cells. In this review, we discuss the emerging data surrounding potential mechanisms of resistance, including various biomarkers explored in clinical trials of immune therapy for sarcomas. We also review future directions in clinical trials that are focused on boosting tumor immunogenicity to improve the activity of checkpoint inhibitors, as well as adoptive cellular therapy approaches to bypass deficiencies in neoantigens or antigen presentation.

Background: Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare form of cancer primarily affecting connective tissue in adults. Standard chemotherapy includes the anthracycline doxorubicin which has previously been shown in a variety of cancer models to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD). ICD is driven, in part, by the upregulation and/or translocation of molecules such as calreticulin and annexin I, known as damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). We aimed to investigate the ICD capacity of anthracyclines doxorubicin and mitoxantrone and explore activity in combination with anti-PD1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors.Methods: We treated a variety of human osteosarcoma cell lines and MCA-205 mouse fibrosarcoma cells with doxorubicin and mitoxantrone and measured expression of DAMPs and immunosuppressive markers via multiplex flow cytometry. We also measured anti-tumor activity of doxorubicin with and without PD1/CTLA4 blockade in the murine sarcoma model MCA-205. After tumors were harvested, we analyzed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to determine the effects of treatment on phenotype, quantity, activation status, function, clonality, and expression of immune checkpoint proteins.Results: We found expression of Annexin I and TRAIL-R2 on the cell surface of osteosarcoma cell lines treated with anthracyclines and significant inhibition of tumor growth with the combination of doxorubicin plus PD1/CTLA4 blockade compared to either doxorubicin or checkpoint blockade alone. Profiling of TILs revealed a marked increase in CD8:CD4 ratio and increased expression of checkpoint proteins including PD1, 41BB and TIM3 in the combination of doxorubicin plus checkpoint blockade. Finally, increased preponderance of the TCRVb 5.1-5.2 clonotype was observed with the combination in TIL, which was not observed in spleen or peripheral blood samples.Conclusion: We have observed early evidence of improved anti-tumor effects with combination doxorubicin plus PD1/CTLA4 along with reshaping of the TIL repertoire, suggesting that doxorubicin may improve immunogenic cell death and supporting clinical investigation in human sarcoma patients. Citation Format: Nicholas R Therrien, Kyle Powers, Lindsey Kemp, Cristiam Moreno Tellez, Breelyn A Wilky. Evaluation of doxorubicin and PD-1/CTLA-4 immune blockade combination therapy in the MCA-205 murine model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2022 Oct 21-24; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2022;10(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B64.

Summary Recent work confirms a bench-to-bedside approach that circulating tumor DNA is associated with outcome and objective response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma. Liquid biopsies may be used for risk stratification in future trials guiding treatment decisions by identifying patients who are likely to benefit from chemotherapy. See related article by Madanat-Harjuoja et al., p. 2579

Purpose Amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKS) are therapeutic targets in multiple tumor types (e.g. HER2 in breast cancer), and amplification of the chromosome 4 segment harboring the three RTKs KIT, PDGFRA, and KDR (4q12amp) may be similarly targetable. The presence of 4q12amp has been sporadically reported in small tumor specific series but a large‐scale analysis is lacking. We assess the pan‐cancer landscape of 4q12amp and provide early clinical support for the feasibility of targeting this amplicon. Experimental Design Tumor specimens from 132,872 patients with advanced cancer were assayed with hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling which assays 186–315 genes for all classes of genomic alterations, including amplifications. Baseline demographic data were abstracted, and presence of 4q12amp was defined as 6 or more copies of KIT/KDR/PDGFRA. Concurrent alterations and treatment outcomes with matched therapies were explored in a subset of cases. Results Overall 0.65% of cases harbored 4q12amp at a median copy number of 10 (range 6–344). Among cancers with >100 cases in this series, glioblastomas, angiosarcomas, and osteosarcomas were enriched for 4q12amp at 4.7%, 4.8%, and 6.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001), giving an overall sarcoma (n = 6,885) incidence of 1.9%. Among 99 pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases harboring 4q12amp, 50 (50%) lacked any other known driver of NSLCC. Four index cases plus a previously reported case on treatment with empirical TKIs monotherapy had stable disease on average exceeding 20 months. Conclusion We define 4q12amp as a significant event across the pan‐cancer landscape, comparable to known pan‐cancer targets such as NTRK and microsatellite instability, with notable enrichment in several cancers such as osteosarcoma where standard treatment is limited. The responses to available TKIs observed in index cases strongly suggest 4q12amp is a druggable oncogenic target across cancers that warrants a focused drug development strategy. Implications for Practice Coamplification of the receptor tyrosine kinases (rtks) KIT/KDR/PDGFRA (4q12amp) is present broadly across cancers (0.65%), with enrichment in osteosarcoma and gliomas. Evidence for this amplicon having an oncogenic role is the mutual exclusivity of 4q12amp to other known drivers in 50% of pulmonary adenocarcinoma cases. Furthermore, preliminary clinical evidence for driver status comes from four index cases of patients empirically treated with commercially available tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/KDR/PDGFRA who had stable disease for 20 months on average. The sum of these lines of evidence suggests further clinical and preclinical investigation of 4q12amp is warranted as the possible basis for a pan‐cancer drug development strategy., Matching treatment strategy to tumor biology is central to precision medicine. The co‐amplification of three distinct RTK encoding genes (KIT, KDR, and PDGFRA) on chromosome 4q12 (4q12amp) may be an oncogenic driver and thus a target for therapy. This article assesses the pan‐cancer landscape of 4q12amp and provides clinical support for the feasibility of targeting this amplicon.

Background Gene-modified autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) reactive against the NY-ESO-1-specific HLA-A*02-restricted peptide SLLMWITQC (NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells; GSK 794), have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma (SS). The factors contributing to gene-modified T-cell expansion and the changes within the tumor microenvironment (TME) following T-cell infusion remain unclear. These studies address the immunological mechanisms of response and resistance in patients with SS treated with NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells. Methods Four cohorts were included to evaluate antigen expression and preconditioning on efficacy. Clinical responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Engineered T-cell persistence was determined by qPCR. Serum cytokines were evaluated by immunoassay. Transcriptomic analyses and immunohistochemistry were performed on tumor biopsies from patients before and after T-cell infusion. Gene-modified T-cells were detected within the TME via an RNAish assay. Results Responses across cohorts were affected by preconditioning and intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Of the 42 patients reported (data cut-off 4June2018), 1 patient had a complete response, 14 patients had partial responses, 24 patients had stable disease, and 3 patients had progressive disease. The magnitude of gene-modified T-cell expansion shortly after infusion was associated with response in patients with high intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Patients receiving a fludarabine-containing conditioning regimen experienced increases in serum IL-7 and IL-15. Prior to infusion, the TME exhibited minimal leukocyte infiltration; CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were the dominant population. Modest increases in intra-tumoral leukocytes (≤5%) were observed in a subset of subjects at approximately 8 weeks. Beyond 8 weeks post infusion, the TME was minimally infiltrated with a TAM-dominant leukocyte infiltrate. Tumor-associated antigens and antigen presentation did not significantly change within the tumor post-T-cell infusion. Finally, NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells trafficked to the TME and maintained cytotoxicity in a subset of patients. Conclusions Our studies elucidate some factors that underpin response and resistance to NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy. From these data, we conclude that a lymphodepletion regimen containing high doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is necessary for SPEAR T-cell persistence and efficacy. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that non-T-cell inflamed tumors, which are resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, can be treated with adoptive T-cell based immunotherapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01343043, Registered 27 April 2011.

The entity "pericytoma with t(7;12)" was described as a rare, distinct perivascular myoid neoplasm provisionally classified within the family of myopericytic tumors that demonstrates t(7;12)(p22;q13) translocation with resultant ACTB-GLI1 fusion and biologically was felt to behave in an indolent fashion. However, a recent study showed that tumors with this and similar translocations may have variable morphology and immunohistochemical phenotype with inconsistent myopericytic characteristics and a propensity for metastasis, raising questions regarding the most appropriate classification of these neoplasms. Herein, we report 3 additional patients with tumors harboring t(7;12) and ACTB-GLI1 fusion. The tumors arose in adults and involved the proximal tibia and adjacent soft tissues, scapula and adjacent soft tissues, and ovary. All tumors were composed of round-to-ovoid cells with a richly vascularized stroma with many small, delicate, branching blood vessels, where the neoplastic cells were frequently arranged in a perivascular distribution. Both tumors involving bone showed histologic features of malignancy. By immunohistochemistry, all tested tumors were at least focally positive for smooth muscle actin (3/3) and CD99 (patchy) (2/2), with variable staining for muscle-specific actin (2/3), S100 protein (1/3), epithelial membrane antigen (2/3), and pan-keratin (1/3); all were negative for desmin and WT1 (0/3). The 2 patients with bone tumors developed metastases (27 and 84 mo after diagnosis). Whether these tumors are best classified as malignant myopericytoma variants or an emerging translocation-associated sarcoma of uncertain differentiation remains to be fully clarified; however, our study further documents the potential for these tumors to behave in an aggressive fashion, sometimes over a prolonged clinical course.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized our approach to cancer treatment in the past decade. While monoclonal antibodies to CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 have produced remarkable and durable responses in a subset of patients, the majority of patients will still develop primary or adaptive resistance. With complex mechanisms of resistance limiting the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, it is critical to develop combination approaches to allow more patients to benefit from immunotherapy. In this review, I approach the current landscape of ICI research from the perspective of sarcomas, a rare group of bone and soft tissue cancers that have had limited benefit from checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, and little investigation of biomarkers to predict responses. By surveying the various mechanisms of resistance and treatment modalities being explored in other solid tumors, I outline how ICIs will undoubtedly serve as the critical foundation for future directions in modern immunotherapy.

Despite their rarity, angiosarcomas are one of the most aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Management can often be challenging due to their location and infiltrative nature. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is always warranted, but the recurrence remains high even for localized tumors despite multimodality treatment. In the metastatic setting, cytotoxic chemotherapies, targeted therapies, and, more recently, immunotherapy are used. The sequence of systemic therapies remains currently a topic of active investigation. Over the last couple of years, there have been significant advances in understanding angiosarcoma biology, most notably via patient-driven initiatives like the Angiosarcoma Project. The knowledge derived from such translational work has led to identifying potential biomarkers of response to treatments and exploring new therapeutic avenues. More clinical trials are underway to expand treatment options and improve patient outcomes.

Macrophages can be co-opted to contribute to neoplastic, neurologic, and inflammatory diseases. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R)-dependent macrophages and other inflammatory cells can suppress the adaptive immune system in cancer and contribute to angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis. CSF1R-expressing osteoclasts mediate bone degradation in osteolytic cancers and cancers that metastasize to bone. In the rare disease tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), aberrant CSF1 expression and production driven by a gene translocation leads to the recruitment and growth of tumors formed by CSF1R-dependent inflammatory cells. Small molecules and antibodies targeting the CSF1/CSF1R axis have shown promise in the treatment of TGCT and cancer, with pexidartinib recently receiving FDA approval for treatment of TGCT. Many small-molecule kinase inhibitors of CSF1R also inhibit the closely related kinases KIT, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and FLT3, thus CSF1R suppression may be limited by off-target activity and associated adverse events. Vimseltinib (DCC-3014) is an oral, switch control tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically designed to selectively and potently inhibit CSF1R by exploiting unique features of the switch control region that regulates kinase conformational activation. In preclinical studies, vimseltinib durably suppressed CSF1R activity in vitro and in vivo, depleted macrophages and other CSF1R-dependent cells, and resulted in inhibition of tumor growth and bone degradation in mouse cancer models. Translationally, in a phase I clinical study, vimseltinib treatment led to modulation of biomarkers of CSF1R inhibition and reduction in tumor burden in TGCT patients.

Background Among sarcomas, which are rare cancers, many types are exceedingly rare; however, a definition of ultra-rare cancers has not been established. The problem of ultra-rare sarcomas is particularly relevant because they represent unique diseases, and their rarity poses major challenges for diagnosis, understanding disease biology, generating clinical evidence to support new drug development, and achieving formal authorization for novel therapies. Methods The Connective Tissue Oncology Society promoted a consensus effort in November 2019 to establish how to define ultra-rare sarcomas through expert consensus and epidemiologic data and to work out a comprehensive list of these diseases. The list of ultra-rare sarcomas was based on the 2020 World Health Organization classification, The incidence rates were estimated using the Information Network on Rare Cancers (RARECARENet) database and NETSARC (the French Sarcoma Network's clinical-pathologic registry). Incidence rates were further validated in collaboration with the Asian cancer registries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Results It was agreed that the best criterion for a definition of ultra-rare sarcomas would be incidence. Ultra-rare sarcomas were defined as those with an incidence of approximately ≤1 per 1,000,000, to include those entities whose rarity renders them extremely difficult to conduct well powered, prospective clinical studies. On the basis of this threshold, a list of ultra-rare sarcomas was defined, which comprised 56 soft tissue sarcoma types and 21 bone sarcoma types. Conclusions Altogether, the incidence of ultra-rare sarcomas accounts for roughly 20% of all soft tissue and bone sarcomas. This confirms that the challenges inherent in ultra-rare sarcomas affect large numbers of patients.

2604 Background: XmAb23104 is a bispecific antibody targeting T cells that simultaneously express PD-1, an immune checkpoint, and ICOS, a costimulatory molecule expressed after T cell activation. DUET-3 is a Phase 1, first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion study in subjects with advanced solid tumors, designed to assess safety, tolerability and to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of XmAb23104. Secondary objectives are to assess pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity. We report preliminary data from the completed dose-escalation phase. Methods: A 3+3 monotherapy dose escalation with 9 dose levels from 0.002 to 15 mg/kg has been completed. Subjects with measurable disease who progressed on prior standard therapy were eligible. A minimum 6-week washout from prior pembrolizumab was required. XmAb23104 was administered biweekly and RECIST 1.1 assessment was performed every 8 weeks. Results: Sixty-two subjects were treated in escalation at doses up to 15 mg/kg; no dose-limiting toxicities were observed and an MTD was not reached. These subjects had advanced disease, 92% were Stage IV at screening, the median number of prior therapies was 3, and 37% had previous checkpoint therapy. Thirty-seven subjects (59.7%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE); the most common were diarrhea (9.7%), decreased appetite (9.7%), and fatigue (9.7%). The majority of TRAEs were Grades 1 or 2, with 6 subjects (9.7%) having a Grade 3 or higher TRAE. Thirteen immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 8 subjects; no individual irAE occurred in more than 1 subject. Most irAEs were mild (Grades 1 and 2) with 1 Grade 3 pruritus and 1 asymptomatic Grade 4 lipase elevation. Partial responses were observed in 3 subjects (sarcoma; prior PD-1 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [HNSCC] and renal cell carcinoma [RCC]), and stable disease > 12 months was observed in 2 subjects with colorectal cancer (CRC; 1 MSS and 1 MSI-H). A dose of 10 mg/kg was selected after consideration of PK, safety, and clinical activity data in consultation with the investigators and continues to be evaluated in the expansion part of the study. Conclusions: The dose escalation part of this study indicates XmAb23104 was generally well tolerated at doses up to 15 mg/kg and has shown clinical activity in subjects with advanced solid tumors. CTLA4 blockade has been found to increase the frequency of ICOS-expressing T cells in prostate cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, and hepatocellular cancer (Chen, 2009; Liakou, 2008; Wei, 2017) and may be applicable to other immunogenic tumor types. XmAb23104 is currently being studied alone or in combination with ipilimumab in expansion in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, CRC, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, HNSCC, and RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03752398.

11564 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of cancers with high unmet need. Trabectedin (T) is an FDA-approved chemotherapy that blocks cell cycling and DNA repair pathways. Combination T and conventional radiation (XRT) in STS nonrandomized phase 1/2 trials demonstrated objective response rates (ORR) of 36-72% in localized and low burden metastatic disease, while pre-treated metastatic STS treated with T alone has an ORR of 10-14%. We hypothesize that the combination of T and hypofractionated radiation (hXRT) will exhibit a tolerable safety profile and improve ORR relative to historical outcomes with T or hXRT alone. Here we report our experience in the treatment of oligometastatic STS with combined T and hXRT. Methods: We reviewed our institutional experience to identify patients treated with T and XRT. We included patients with high risk localized or metastatic STS (majority of patients had metastatic disease at time of treatment). All patients received at least 1 cycle of T and concurrent XRT to at least 1 lesion. ORR and local control rate (LCR) were determined for irradiated lesions by RECIST 1.1. Results: Between 2020 – 2021, 9 STS patients with 21 tumors were treated at the University of Colorado with XRT and concurrent T. The median age was 39.2 (range 26.0 – 64.6) years. 8 patients had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. Treated tumor sites included 1 lung,1 extremity, 2 liver, 2 retroperitoneal, 5 bone, and 10 peritoneal. The following histologic subtypes were included: myxoid liposarcoma (3), uterine leiomyosarcoma (2), non-uterine leiomyosarcoma (1), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (1), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (1), and synovial sarcoma (1). All metastatic patients were pre-treated with a median of 3 lines of systemic therapy. The median number of T cycles delivered was 5 (range 1 – 20). The median XRT prescription dose was 3000cGy (range 2000cGy – 5000cGy), with 8 patients having received hXRT (5 -10 fractions) and 1 having received conventionally fractionated XRT. 8 patients underwent 1 course of XRT, while 1 received 3 courses in combination with T. All patients had a Karnofsky performance status equal to or greater than 60. After a median follow-up 5.4 months, the LCR of treated lesions was 90.5%. The ORR (CR or PR) was 57.1% and median decrease in tumor diameter at time of maximum response was 52.0%. The median time until maximum response was 3.7 months. 2 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (LFT elevation) attributable to T, and 2 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity due to XRT. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Conclusions: T in combination with hXRT appears to be safe and feasible in this patient population. Based on these data, a phase 1/2 prospective clinical trial is being planned in oligometastatic and high risk localized STS. [Table: see text]

2611 Background: PSB205 is a new biological agent consisting of two engineered monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA-4 IgG1) expressed in a fixed ratio (2:1) from a single cell-line, manufactured as one product and dispensed from a single vial. PSB205 was designed to optimally balance efficacy and safety through differential target coverage of PD-1 and CTLA-4: the anti-CTLA-4 antibody was engineered to have a shorter half-life to modulate exposure and lower risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We report safety data from a first-in-human study, conducted in standard 3+3 Phase 1 dose escalation format, enrolling subjects with refractory solid tumors with mixed histologies, who had exhausted available standard treatments. Primary objectives were safety (including Dose Limiting Toxicities), tolerability and selection of a Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were PK and preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Treatment was Q3 wks. Inclusive the 1st week following the 2nd infusion, the DLT-period was 28 days. Results:Nine US-centers enrolled 27 subjects, representing 19 tumor histologies, in 5 ascending dose cohorts ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg; an additional N = 49 pts were dosed in expansion cohorts at 5 mg/kg and 400 mg (fixed dose). Median number of prior systemic treatments for metastatic disease was 4. No DLT was observed at any of dose level evaluated. The most frequent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAE) reported were diarrhea (9%), Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) (5%) and fatigue (4%). Among the subset (N = 33) who completed at least 4 cycles of treatment, the most common TRAE were diarrhea (21%), IRR (12%), Fatigue (9%), and irAEs, specifically colitis, rash and arthralgia (6% each symptom). Most TRAEs were Grade 1 /2, with just 1 case each of diarrhea and colitis Graded as G 3/4. Tumor responses (all PRs) were observed at dose levels of 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg in 4 pts - 1 each with with RCC, SCLC, HNSCC and gastric cancer. Conclusions: PSB205 provides dual checkpoint blockade with a very tolerable side effect profile, with less AEs than typically noted in published studies of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy. Further studies are ongoing to confirm this observation. Dose levels of 5 mg/kg and 400 mg fixed were selected for Phase 2, which has commenced enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03986606.

Denosumab is an established targeted systemic therapy for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). We sought to determine whether treatment response could be quantified from radiomics analysis of radiographs taken longitudinally during treatment.Pre- and post-treatment radiographs of 10 GCTB tumors from 10 patients demonstrating histologic response after treatment with denosumab were analyzed. Intensity- and texture-based radiomics features for each manually segmented tumor were calculated. Radiomics features were compared pre- and post-treatment in tumors.Mean intensity (p = 0.033) significantly increased while skewness (p = 0.028) significantly decreased after treatment. Post-treatment increases in fractal dimensions (p = 0.057) and abundance (p = 0.065) approached significance. A potential linear correlation in mean (p = 0.005; ΔMean = 0.022 * duration - 0.026) with treatment duration was observed.Radiomics analysis of plain radiographs quantifies time-dependent matrix mineralization and trabecular reconstitution that mark positive response of giant cell tumors of bone to denosumab.

In this report, we describe a 54-year-old male with cystic retroperitoneal sarcoma extending through the inguinal canal. Patient initially underwent inguinal hernia repair with mesh placement for suspected cord lipoma, after which he developed recurrent loculated retroperitoneal fluid collections refractory to multiple attempts at drain placement and laparotomy. Twenty-nine months after initial surgery, patient was referred to our institution on suspicion of malignancy. Pathology of resections taken during subsequent laparotomy showed foci of malignant cells interspersed throughout reactive proliferations. Follow-up immunohistochemistry confirmed high-grade sarcoma, likely atypical liposarcoma, but was unable to definitively establish subtype. Despite en bloc resection and gemcitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy, local progression continued, and patient was enrolled in clinical trials of doxorubicin with dual immune checkpoint blockade. This case suggests that sarcoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal or inguinal mass unresponsive to treatment; and highlights the difficulty of subtyping and managing cystic retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Background Zalifrelimab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte -associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). Preliminary data demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability, as monotherapy, in patients with recurrent solid tumors including rare tumor types. Previously presented Phase I data reported one durable complete response in recurrent cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS).1 Here we report additional clinical responses from an ongoing Phase 2 study of zalifrelimab monotherapy including clinical benefit in rare solid tumors. Methods In an ongoing, phase 2 study (NCT03104699), the safety and efficacy of zalifrelimab, as monotherapy, was evaluated in patients who progressed on prior anti-PD-1/L1 treatment. All patients were treated intravenously (IV) with zalifrelimab at 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or up to 2 years. Results Overall, 44 patients were treated and 29 patients were response-evaluable at the time of report. In patients with refractory solid tumors treated with zalifrelimab, we report a disease control rate (CR, PR, and SD) of 51.7%, objective response rate (ORR) of 10.3% (3/29), disease stabilization of 41.3% (12/29). Clinical activity was observed in five solid tumors considered rare, including; cAS (N=1), glucagonoma (N=1), chondrosarcoma (N=1), spindle-cell sarcoma (N=1) and fibroblastic sarcoma (N=1). In these rare tumors, durable partial responses of 45 and 30 weeks were observed in cAS of the scalp with lymph node metastases and glucagonoma, respectively. Both patients remain on zalifrelimab with no evidence of disease progression. Additionally, durable disease stabilization was observed in a patient with spindle-cell sarcoma. Patients with chondrosarcoma and fibroblastic sarcoma progressed on therapy. Zalifrelimab was well tolerated with the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events including fatigue, nausea, anemia, diarrhea and vomiting, consistent with the drug class. Most events were mild or moderate and resolved with standard treatments. Conclusions Our data demonstrates the potential for Zalifrelimab to promote meaningful clinical benefit in difficult to treat tumors, including patients that progress on prior PD-1/PD-L1 therapy or chemotherapy. Notably, responses were observed in rare tumor types such as recurrent cutaneous angiosarcoma and glucagonoma. Treatment with zalifrelimab is safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies. Trial Registration NCT03104699. Reference Vaia Florou, Andrew E Rosenberg, Eric Wieder, Krishna V. Komanduri, Despina Kolonias, Mohamed Uduman, John C Castle, Jennifer S. Buell, Jonathan C. Trent and Breelyn A. Wilky Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 2019 7:213.

Giant cell tumor of bone is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing neoplasm. Evidence suggests that the neoplastic cells may be osteoblastic in differentiation. Standard treatment is surgical removal, but medical therapy with denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ ligand, has become a component of patient management in select cases. Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone (DT-GCTB) shows drastic morphologic changes including the presence of abundant bone. To further determine the relationship of the neoplastic cells to osteoblast phenotype, we performed a morphologic and immunohistochemical study on a series of DT-GCTB. Cases of DT-GCTB were retrieved from surgical pathology files, available slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W, SATB2, and p63 was performed. The cohort included 31 tumors from 30 patients (2:3 male:female), ages 15 to 73 years (median=36 y). The morphology of post-denosumab-treated tumors ranged from tumors composed of an abundant bone matrix with few spindle cells to spindle cell-predominant tumors. Five had focal residual classic CGTB, and 2 manifested mild nuclear atypia. The majority expressed all markers: 86.2% for H3.3 G34W, 96.7% for SATB2, and 100% for p63. All markers stained the various tumor components including spindle cells and the cells on the surface of and within the treated tumor bone matrix. Most markers were also positive in reactive-appearing woven bone adjacent to tumor: 84.6% for H3.3 G34W, 100% for SATB2, and 68% for p63. These findings suggest that denosumab treatment of giant cell tumor of bone results in osteoblastic differentiation with bone production.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare soft tissue sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract, with most carrying conserved driver mutations in the tyrosine kinase receptors KIT or PDGFRα. The use of targeted therapy against these mutations in GISTs is one of the most successful examples of precision medicine in solid tumors, beginning in 2002 with the development of imatinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of KIT. In recent years, much progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of GISTs while unveiling their genetic heterogeneity. Since development of secondary mutations leads to imatinib resistance, the majority of research efforts have focused on identification of novel inhibitors to improve outcomes in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Sunitinib and regorafenib are two TKIs with demonstrated activity after failure of imatinib, which led to the U.S. FDA approval. Pivotal phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing with two novel agents, avapritinib and ripretinib, based on their remarkable activities in the 4th or greater line settings in phase 1/2 studies of these drugs. In this review, we will outline the remarkable diversity of genetic mutations in GISTs, and review the evidence for treatment options of genomic medicine in locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Background Relapsed and refractory sarcomas continue to have poor survival rates. The cancer stem cell (CSC) theory provides a tractable explanation for the observation that recurrences occur despite dramatic responses to upfront chemotherapy. Preclinical studies demonstrated that inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) sensitizes the CSC population to chemotherapy. Methods Here we present the results of the Phase II portion of a Phase I/II clinical trial that aimed to overcome the chemoresistance of sarcoma CSC by combining the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (20 mg/m2 weekly) with the chemotherapeutic agent liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 monthly). Results Fifteen patients with relapsed/refractory sarcoma were evaluable at this recommended Phase 2 dose level. The median progression free survival was 315 days (range 27–799). Response rate, defined as stable disease or better for 60 days, was 53%. Nine of the patients had been previously treated with doxorubicin. Therapy was well tolerated. In a small number of patients, pre- and post- treatment tumor biopsies were available for assessment of ALDH expression as a marker of CSCs and showed a correlation between response and decreased ALDH expression. We also found a correlation between biopsy-proven inhibition of mTOR and response. Conclusions Our study adds to the literature supporting the addition of mTOR inhibition to chemotherapy agents for the treatment of sarcomas, and proposes that a mechanism by which mTOR inhibition enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy may be through sensitizing the chemoresistant CSC population. Further study, ideally with pre- and post-therapy assessment of ALDH expression in tumor cells, is warranted. Trial registration The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00949325) on 30 July 2009. http://www.editorialmanager.com/csrj/default.aspx

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment paradigm of melanoma and other malignancies. Recently, trials of checkpoint inhibition in sarcomas have been far from outstanding, although specific sarcoma subtypes appear to benefit from these novel therapies. The next steps involve combining immune checkpoint inhibition with classic cancer therapies in order to increase immunogenicity and also potentially complex immunotherapy techniques such as adoptive cell therapy. Currently, numerous clinical trials are exploring different immunotherapies in the sarcomas. Herein, we describe some of the preclinical and clinical data that have laid the groundwork for the use of immunotherapies in sarcomas, as well as the current and future studies that could make immunotherapy a therapeutic option for patients with sarcoma.

BackgroundAGEN1181 is a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody with enhanced FcyR-dependent functionality, engineered to bind high and low binding alleles of FcyRIIIA, promoting superior T cell priming, memory responses, and depletion of intratumoral T regulatory cells. Further, AGEN1181 avoids complement recruitment, predictive of better tolerability. Here we report initial safety and efficacy findings from a phase I/Ib study of AGEN1181 as monotherapy and in combination with balstilimab (BAL; anti-PD-1).MethodsEligible patients (pts) had advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. AGEN1181 was dosed Q3W (0.1–3 mg/kg) or Q6W (1–2 mg/kg) as monotherapy, or Q6W (0.1–2 mg/kg) in combination with BAL Q2W (3 mg/kg).ResultsAs of July 16th 2021, 102 pts received AGEN1181 (43 monotherapy, 59 combination). Median age, 63 years (29–83); 50.5% with ≥3 prior lines of therapy. MTD not yet reached with AGEN1181 dosing up to 3 mg/kg Q3W as monotherapy and 2 mg/kg in combination with BAL. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were fatigue (34.3%), diarrhea (32.4%), and nausea (19.6%) with grade ≥3 events in 21.6% (diarrhea/colitis, 11.8%, fatigue, 2.9%). Notably, no immune-related hypophysitis or pneumonitis has been observed. Discontinuation from AGEN1181 due to TRAEs occurred in 15% of pts. Grade 5 TRAEs occurred in two pts (colitis [chronic], intestinal perforation). The disease control rate in evaluable pts (completed ≥1 on-treatment scan) defined as best overall response of CR, PR, or SD ≥6 weeks was 48.1% for AGEN1181 monotherapy ≥1 mg/kg (1 CR, 3 PR, 9 SD) and 70% for combination (3 PR, 6 unconfirmed PR [uPR], 19 SD). Monotherapy responders include individual pts with MSS endometrial cancer (CR), PD-1-relapsed/refractory cervical cancer (PR), PD-1-relapsed/refractory melanoma (PR), and pancreatic cancer (PR). Enrollment is continuing in several disease expansion cohorts with combination therapy. For MSS CRC, 2 PR, 2 uPR, and 7 SD have been seen in 17 evaluable ≥1 mg/kg patients to date. In the ovarian cohort (n=6), 2 PRs and 3 SD are noted. Additional combination responders include one PR and uPR in MSS endometrial cancer, two uPRs in visceral angiosarcoma (uPRs) and one uPR in PD-1-relapsed/refractory NSCLC (uPR); the majority of the responses are recent and ongoing.ConclusionsAGEN1181 alone and in combination with BAL demonstrates favorable tolerability and compelling clinical activity, notably in poorly immunogenic tumor types and PD-1-refractory pts. These results underscore the significant potential of AGEN1181 to expand benefit of anti-CTLA-4 therapy to a broader patient population.Trial RegistrationNCT03860272Ethics ApprovalThe study obtained ethics approval at each participating center (UT Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, University of Colorado Cancer Center, St John’s Cancer Institute, and HonorHealth under WIRB Study number 1256391; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and MD Anderson Cancer Center, approval numbers HS19-00277, 19–132, and 140346, respectively). All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with federal, local, and institutional guidelines.

Highlights • Myoepithelial carcinoma of the vulva and epithelioid sarcoma has overlapping histological, immunohistochemical and genetic features. • Similarities between two diagnoses in aggressive vulvar cancer should be noted as a sarcoma-based chemotherapy regimen should be considered. • We recommend immediate surgical resection with bilateral superficial and deep inguinal lymph node dissections in these aggressive cancers. • Identification of SMARCB1-deficiency trials of targeted therapies such as EZH2 inhibitors which show promise in halting further progression., Introduction Myoepithelial carcinoma and proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the vulva are two rare malignancies with known aggressive behavior. In addition to a similar clinical course, these two disease entities also have significant histologic and pathologic overlap. Given the rarity of these malignancies, there is limited literature on the appropriate treatment regimen. Nevertheless, there is a consensus that early surgical resection is beneficial in both cases. Presentation We present a case of a patient who was initially diagnosed with myoepithelial carcinoma of the vulva with a differential later expanded to include possible epithelioid sarcoma. Discussion We demonstrate the importance in early identification of a SMARCB1 deficiency. Additionally, we suggest an appropriate treatment regimen for these patients going forward. Specifically, we encourage consideration of bilateral superficial and deep inguinal lymphadenectomies. Furthermore, sarcoma based chemotherapy regimens in the appropriate clinical setting may be beneficial in treating SMARCB1 deficient tumors. Additionally, there are now clinical trials involving EZH2 Inhibitors which may offer benefit for similar patients going forward. Conclusion This case highlights the difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, and the importance in identifying a SMARCB1 deficiency as it will affect treatment options and may allow for enrollment in ongoing clinical trials.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common GI tract mesenchymal tumors. GIST patients are optimally managed by a precision medicine approach. Herein, we discuss the latest advances in precision medicine and ongoing clinical trials relevant to GIST. Circulating tumor DNA for detection of mutational changes could replace tissue biopsies and radiographic imaging once validated. Most GISTs are KIT/PDGFRα mutated, and despite the good clinical response to imatinib, treatment is generally not curative, more often due to secondary mutations. New mechanisms to bypass this resistance by inhibiting KIT downstream pathways and by targeting multiple KIT or PDGFRα mutations are being investigated. Immunotherapy for GIST patients is in its infancy. These approaches may lead to more effective, less toxic therapies.

Until recently, advancements in the treatment of patients with adult soft tissue sarcomas have been relatively slow. This is, in part, due to their heterogeneity and rarity. A better understanding of the biology and differences among the various histologies has led to substantial growth in novel strategies. In addition to novel cytotoxic chemotherapies, agents targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα), mTOR, and angiogenesis are areas of active investigation. Additionally, with the success of checkpoint inhibitors in other malignancies and early encouraging results of checkpoint inhibitors in some sarcoma subtypes, this approach is being widely investigated in various sarcomas. As we increasingly recognize and treat each sarcoma histology as a separate disease, it is important to spread awareness of the exciting clinical trials available to our patients with these rare malignancies.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) contain tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their presence provides an opportunity and rationale for developing effective forms of immunotherapy. The types of tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells and relevant immune checkpoint inhibitors are the focus of active investigation. The most numerous tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells are tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and CD3+ T cells. Studies have shown that patients with GISTs that harbor increased numbers of CD3+ T cells have better outcomes. However, the clinical behavior of GIST has not been shown to correlate with the number of TAMs. The biological significance of other less frequent tumor-infiltrating immune cells including tumor-infiltrating neurtrophils (TINs), natural killer cells (NKs), B cells, dendritic cells (DCs) remains unclear. The immune checkpoint inhibitors CTLA-4, PD1/PDL1 and TIM3/galectin-9 are molecules that can be targeted by synthesized antibodies. Clinical and pre-clinical trials using this approach against immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-KIT antibody and the generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have shown promising results. The treatment of GIST with immunotherapy is complex and evolving; this article reviews its current status for patients with GISTs.

Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas.We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue.We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29%) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43%) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities.This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.

Background Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Results We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29%) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43%) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.

Summary Background VEGF promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment and contributes to immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in cancer. We aimed to assess the activity of the VEGF receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor axitinib plus the anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with sarcoma. Methods This single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was undertaken at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Miami, FL, USA, and participants were recruited from all over the USA and internationally. Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older, and had histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic sarcomas, including alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS); measurable disease with one site amenable to repeated biopsies; an ECOG performance status of 0–1; and progressive disease after previous treatment with at least one line of systemic therapy (unless no standard treatment existed or the patient declined therapy). The first five patients were enrolled in a lead-in cohort and were given axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously for 30 min on day 8 and every 3 weeks for cycles of 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Thereafter, patients received escalating doses of axitinib (2–10 mg) plus flat dose pembrolizumab according to the schedule above. The primary endpoint was 3-month progression-free survival. All patients were evaluable for survival and safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02636725, and is closed to accrual. Findings Between April 19, 2016, and Feb 7, 2018, of 36 patients assessed for eligibility, 33 (92%) were enrolled and given study treatment (intention-to-treat population and safety population), 12 (36%) of whom had ASPS. With a median follow-up of 14·7 months (IQR 10·1–19·1), 3-month progression-free survival for all evaluable patients was 65·6% (95% CI 46·6–79·3). For patients with ASPS, 3-month progression-free survival was 72·7% (95% CI 37·1–90·3). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included hypertension (five [15%] of 33 patients), autoimmune toxicities (five [15%]), nausea or vomiting (two [6%]), and seizures (two [6%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (21%) patients, including autoimmune colitis, transaminitis, pneumothorax, haemoptysis, seizures, and hypertriglyceridemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Axitinib plus pembrolizumab has manageable toxicity and preliminary activity in patients with advanced sarcomas, particularly patients with ASPS, warranting further investigation in randomised controlled trials. Funding Merck, Pfizer, American Cancer Society, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: To determine whether MRI volumetric and image texture analysis correlates with treatment-induced biologic changes in desmoid fibromatosis (DF) earlier than conventional response criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 27 patients with histologically proven extra-abdominal DF who were managed with active surveillance or systemic therapy (from 2004 to 2016). MRI volumetric and image texture parameters were derived from manual tumor segmentations, and tumor signal intensity was normalized to muscle. Results were compared with objective response rates based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, World Health Organization (WHO) lesion response, volumetrics, and MRI-modified Choi criteria. Correlation coefficients (r) between image texture features and maximum tumor diameters were obtained by using a meta-analysis approach. RESULTS: The 27 included patients (mean age, 39 years; 74% women) were followed for an average of 4 years, comprising 207 distinct time-point assessments. The mean baseline tumor maximum diameter was 7.9 cm (range, 3.4–15.2 cm). Partial response (PR) rates as best response were 37%, 44%, 70%, and 81% by RECIST, WHO, volumetrics, and MRI-modified Choi criteria, respectively. Among the 10 tumors showing RECIST PR, a preceding MRI-modified Choi PR was observed in 70% (seven of 10), on average 1.3 years earlier. Multiple image texture parameters showed associations with objective measurements of tumor diameter including mean tumor-to-muscle signal ratio (r = 0.51; P = .004), median tumor-to-muscle signal ratio (r = 0.52; P = .003), energy (r = 0.48; P < .001), run entropy (r = 0.32, P = .04), and gray-level nonuniformity (r = 0.54; P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Volumetric signal and image texture assessment allows more comprehensive analysis of DF biologic change and may permit early prediction of DF behavior and therapeutic response. Keywords: MR Imaging, Soft Tissues/Skin, Neoplasms-Primary © RSNA, 2021