Search

Background: Although use of Cannabis sativa is not associated with serious adverse effects, recreational use of aminoalkylindole (AAI) cannabinoid receptor agonists found in K2/Spice herbal blends has been reported to cause adverse cardiovascular events, including angina, arrhythmia, changes in blood pressure, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction. Δ 9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 -THC) is the primary CB 1 agonist found in cannabis and JWH-073 is one of the AAI CB 1 agonists found in K2/Spice brands sold to the public. Methods: This study used in vitro , in vivo , and ex vivo approaches to investigate potential differences on cardiac tissue and vascular effects betweenJWH-073 and Δ 9 -THC. Male C57BL/6 mice were treated with JWH-073 or Δ 9 -THC and cardiac injury was assessed by histology. Effects of JWH-073 and Δ 9 -THC on H9C2 cell viability and ex vivo mesenteric vascular reactivity were also determined. Results: JWH-073 or Δ 9 -THC induced typical cannabinoid effects of antinociception and hypothermia but did not promote death of cardiac myocytes. No differences in cell viability were observed in cultured H9C2 cardiac myocytes after 24 h of treatment. In isolated mesenteric arteries from drug-naive animals, JWH-073 produced significantly greater maximal relaxation (96%±2% vs. 73%±5%, p <0.05) and significantly greater inhibition of phenylephrine-mediated maximal contraction (Control 174%±11%K MAX ) compared with Δ 9 -THC (50%±17% vs. 119%±16%K MAX , p <0.05). Discussion: These findings suggest that neither cannabinoid at the concentrations/dose studied caused cardiac cell death, but JWH-073 has the potential for greater vascular adverse events than Δ 9 -THC through an increased vasodilatory effect.

Introduction: Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are commonly found in preparations used as recreational drugs. Although severe adverse health effects are not generally associated with cannabis use, a rising number of studies document seizures and even death after SC use. In this study, a mouse model is used to investigate the hypothesis that SCs are more toxic than Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of cannabis. Materials and Methods: Beginning with the SCs, JWH-073 and AM-2201, dose-response curves were generated to find the dose of each drug that was similarly efficacious to 50 mg/kg THC. Mice were given daily intraperitoneal (IP) injections of vehicle, 50 mg/kg THC, 30 mg/kg JWH-073, or 1 mg/kg AM-2201 until tolerance to the antinociceptive and hypothermic effects was complete, and then were assessed for spontaneous and antagonist-precipitated withdrawal and potential organ damage. No differences in tolerance were noted, but AM-2201 showed more rearing in the spontaneous and antagonist-precipitated withdrawal phases than either vehicle or the other two drug treatments. Histopathological examination of these mice revealed no drug-induced lesions. In a subsequent set of experiments, various doses of THC, methanandamide (mAEA), and of a variety of SCs (HU-210, CP55940, JWH-073, AM-2201, and PB-22) were given IP, and convulsions and change in body temperature were quantified. Discussion: The treatments yielded varying numbers of convulsions and a range of changes in body temperature. JWH-073 and AM-2201 produced significantly more convulsions than THC, HU-210, mAEA, or cannabidiol (CBD) (the latter two producing none). HU-210, CP55940, JWH-073, and mAEA produced greater hypothermia than THC or CBD. Convulsions and hypothermia induced by several agonists were prevented by pretreatment with a CB 1 antagonist, but not a CB 2 antagonist. Conclusions: In agreement with human studies and case reports, this study found that SCs generally produced more seizures than THC. Of particular significance was the finding that mAEA produced far greater hypothermia than THC (similar to most SCs), but unlike the SCs and THC, produced no seizures., Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist., (© Chris S. Breivogel et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: To help students develop a more integrated mindset, an integrated curricular model can facilitate the building of connections between the foundational and clinical sciences by presenting multi-disciplinary material within a cohesive framework in a single course. The main objective of this research was to assess the impact of interdisciplinary teaching on student performance in a skills course., Educational Activity and Setting: A case study was presented and questions were embedded through an audience response system. Each of three groups of students (approximately 32 students per group) were divided into teams, and the scores were shown periodically to produce an atmosphere of friendly competition. The entire exercise lasted approximately 50 min., Findings: Students found the pharmaceutical science and pharmacy practice faculty collaboration helpful in regards to reviewing for integrated exams. Student pharmacists were asked to provide one positive aspect of the course and one area for improvement. Twenty-two of 96 responders indicated that the integrated class session was the highlight of the course. Student pharmacists noted that they were able to recognize the integration between the basic and applied sciences. Students clearly favored this learning style over the didactic approach, as evidenced by the feedback. In the future, we plan to implement longer integrated cases more frequently to train future pharmacists as critical and integrative thinkers., Summary: This integrated case study appeared to be effective in helping student pharmacists apply knowledge of various basic science disciplines to the applied sciences., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The recent NIH mandate to consider sex as a biological variable in preclinical research has focused attention on delineation of sex differences in behavior. To investigate mechanisms underlying sex differences in Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) effects, we examined the effects of sex and gonadal hormones on CB 1 receptors in cerebellum, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum., Methods: Adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent gonadectomy (GDX) or sham-GDX. Half of the GDX females and males received estradiol or testosterone replacement (GDX+H), respectively. All rats were injected with vehicle or 30 mg/kg THC twice daily for 1 week before brain collection. CP55,940-stimulated [ 35 S]GTPγS and [ 3 H]SR141716A saturation binding assays were performed., Results: With exception of enhanced receptor activation in the hippocampi of female rats compared to males, vehicle-treated rats exhibited minimal sex differences in CB 1 receptor densities or G-protein coupling. Repeated treatment with THC resulted in pronounced CB 1 receptor desensitization and downregulation in both sexes in all brain regions with a greater magnitude of change in females., Conclusions: These results suggest that sex differences in the density and G-protein coupling of brain CB 1 receptors may play a limited role in sex differences in acute THC effects not mediated by the hippocampus. In contrast, sex differences after repeated THC were common, with females (intact, GDX, and GDX+H) showing greater downregulation or desensitization in all four brain regions compared to the respective male groups. This result is consistent with a finding that women tend to progress to tolerance and dependence quicker than men after initiation of cannabis use., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous studies have found non-CB 1 non-CB 2 G-protein-coupled receptors in rodents that are activated by the aminoalkylindole cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2. This work obtained evidence for the presence or absence of similar receptors in the brains of other mammals, birds and amphibians., Materials and Methods: Antagonism of the stimulation of [ 35 S]GTPγS binding by WIN55212-2 and CP55940 was assessed in multiple CNS regions of rat and canine, and in whole brain membranes from shrew, pigeon, frog and newt. A bioinformatics approach searched for orthologs of GRP3, GPR6, and GPR12 (closely related to cannabinoid receptors) in the genomes of these or related species. Orthologs were examined for amino acid motifs known to impart functionality to receptors., Results: In mammals and pigeon, but not amphibians, a significant fraction of the stimulation of [ 35 S]GTPγS binding by WIN55212-2 was not blocked by the CB 1 antagonist SR141716A. BLAST searches found that GPR3 was restricted to mammals. GPR12 orthologs existed in all species, and they shared identical amino acid motifs. GPR6 orthologs existed all species, but with significant departures in the identity of some critical amino acids in bird, more so in amphibian., Conclusions: The portion of WIN55212-2-stimulated [ 35 S]GTPγS binding that was antagonized by SR141716A was consistent with stimulation via CB 1 receptors, indicating that antagonist-insensitive activity was via a different G-protein coupled receptor. Pharmacological evidence of this receptor was found in the brains of mammals and pigeon, but not frog or newt. Bioinfomatics results implicate GPR6 as a possible candidate for the additional WIN55212-2-sensitive receptor.

Context: Previous studies have indicated a role for beta-arrestin2 in the regulation of brain cannabinoid effects and cannabinoid CB1 receptors, but whether beta-arrestin1 has a role has not been investigated., Objective: To determine the role of beta-arrestin1 in cannabinoid activity., Materials and Methods: Beta-arrestin1 -/- mice and their wild-type (+/+) counterparts were assayed for antinociceptive and temperature-decreasing effects of two ligands, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CP55940, after both single and repeated administration. In vitro assays examined the effects of deletion on CB1 receptor density, agonist-binding and G-protein activation., Results: Deletion of beta-arrestin1 diminished the effects of CP55940 in both antinociception (latency to tail withdrawal) and temperature-depression assays in mice. However, deleting beta-arrestin1 had no effect on the actions of THC in either assay. Antagonist radioligand ([(3)H]SR141716A) saturation binding indicated no difference between beta-arrestin1 +/+ and -/- mice in the density or affinity for cannabinoid CB1 receptors in brain membranes. CP55940 agonist binding in brain membranes from beta-arrestin1 +/+ mice exhibited high- and intermediate-affinity sites, but beta-arrestin1 -/- membranes exhibited an additional site with low affinity. CP55940 produced greater stimulation of [(35)S]GTPγS binding to membranes from whole brain of beta-arrestin1 -/- than +/+ mice. The rates of the development of tolerance to chronic THC or CP55940 administration did not appear to be affected by genotype., Discussion: Beta-arrestin1 appeared to mediate the actions of CP55940, but did not affect the activity of THC., Conclusion: Beta-arrestin1 regulates cannabinoid CB1 receptor sensitivity in an agonist-selective manner, but may not be the primary mediator of tolerance to cannabinoid agonists.

Context: Beta-arrestins are known to couple to some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate receptor internalization, G-protein coupling and signal transduction, but have not been investigated for most receptors, and for very few receptors in vivo. Previous studies have shown that beta-arrestin2 deletion enhances the efficacy of specific cannabinoid agonists., Objective: The present study hypothesized that brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors are regulated by beta-arrestin2., Methods: Beta-arrestin2+/+ and -/- mice were used. Western blotting was used to determine the relative levels of each beta-arrestin subtype in mouse brain. Receptor binding was measured to determine whether deletion of beta-arrestin2 influences agonist binding to brain CB1 receptors, or the subcellular localization of CB1 in brain membranes subjected to differential centrifugation. A variety of cannabinoid agonists from different chemical classes were investigated for their ability to activate G-proteins in the presence and absence of beta-arrestin2 in cerebellum, hippocampus and cortex., Results: No differences were found in the density of beta-arrestin1 or cannabinoid CB1 receptors in several brains of beta-arrestin2+/+ versus -/- mice. Differences between genotypes were found in the proportion of high- and low-affinity agonist binding sites in brain areas that naturally express higher levels of beta-arrestin2. Cortex from beta-arrestin2-/- mice contained less CB1 in the P1 fraction and more CB1 in the P2 fraction compared to beta-arrestin2+/+. Of the agonists assayed for activity, only Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exhibited a difference between genotypes, in that it was less efficacious in beta-arrestin2-/- than +/+ mouse membranes., Conclusion: Beta-arrestin2 regulates cannabinoid CB1 receptors in brain.

Rimonabant, the prototypic antagonist of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors, has been reported to have inverse agonist properties at higher concentrations, which may complicate its use as a tool for mechanistic evaluation of cannabinoid pharmacology. Consequently, recent synthesis efforts have concentrated on discovery of a neutral antagonist using a variety of structural templates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacological properties of the putative neutral cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist O-2050, a sulfonamide side chain analog of Δ(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol. O-2050 and related sulfonamide cannabinoids exhibited good affinity for both cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors. While the other sulfonamide analogs produced cannabinoid agonist effects in vivo (e.g., activity suppression, antinociception, and hypothermia), O-2050 stimulated activity and was inactive in the other two tests. O-2050 also decreased food intake in mice, an effect that was reminiscent of that produced by rimonabant. Unlike rimonabant, however, O-2050 did not block the effects of cannabinoid agonists in vivo, even when administered i.c.v. In contrast, O-2050 antagonized the in vitro effects of cannabinoid agonists in [(35)S]GTPγS and mouse vas deferens assays without having activity on its own in either assay. Further evaluation revealed that O-2050 fully and dose-dependently substituted for Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in a mouse drug discrimination procedure (a cannabinoid agonist effect) and that it inhibited forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP signaling with a maximum efficacy of approximately half that of the full agonist CP55,940 [(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4(1,1-dimethyl-heptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexanol]. Together, these results suggest that O-2050 is not a viable candidate for classification as a neutral cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Humans have used Cannabis sativa (marijuana) for at least 12,000 years, but researchers have only recently described an endogenous cannabinoid system. The endocannabinoid system modulates an array of physiological and psychological functions. Endocannabinoids are widely distributed throughout the body, including the central nervous system (CNS). This article gives a basic overview of endocannabinoid neuroanatomy and function. Several endocannabinoids have been discovered to date, and their roles are being elucidated. Two G-protein coupled cannabinoid receptors, CB1R and CB2R, have been identified, although other candidate receptors exist, including ion channel and nuclear receptors that might be components of the endocannabinoid system. It appears that cannabinoids are dysregulated in a number of psychiatric disorders and might be involved in their pathogenesis. There is now evidence that manipulation of the endocannabinoid system could be a therapeutic target for a variety of conditions.

Little is known about the roles of beta-arrestins in the regulation of brain CB1 cannabinoid receptors. This study investigated the role of beta-arrestin2 in cannabinoid behavioral effects using beta-arrestin2 -/- mice and their wild-type counterparts. A variety of cannabinoid ligands from different chemical classes that exhibit a variety of efficacies for activation of CB1 receptors were investigated, including Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol, CP55940, methanandamide, JWH-073, and O-1812. Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol produced both greater antinociception and greater decreases in body temperature in beta-arrestin2 -/- compared with beta-arrestin2 +/+ mice. No significant differences were, however, present in either assay for the other CB1 agonists. Antagonist radioligand binding indicated no difference in the density of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the cerebellum, cortex, or hippocampus of beta-arrestin2 +/+ and -/- mice. These data demonstrate that beta-arrestin2 may regulate cannabinoid CB1 receptor sensitivity in an agonist-specific manner.

Previous studies have indicated that cannabinoids inhibit presynaptic neurotransmitter release in brain through CB1 receptors. To examine this issue in a primary neuronal culture system, rat cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) were prepared. [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays in saponin-permeabilized CGCs showed that G-protein activation by the CB1 agonist, WIN55212-2, and adenosine A1 agonist, phenylisopropyladenosine, was maximal during the second week in culture. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to a lesser degree than WIN55212-2, and the antagonists SR141716A and AM281 acted as inverse agonists in intact CGCs, but not in CGC membrane preparations. Ten micromolar WIN55212-2 and Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol decreased depolarization-evoked efflux of [3H]-D-aspartate from CGCs by 32% and 13%, respectively. SR141716A and AM281 increased [3H]-D-aspartate release by 28%. The fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and the anandamide uptake inhibitor AM404 inhibited transmitter release, implying that the antagonist effects were mediated by blockade of endocannabinoid activity. Levels of endocannabinoids (both anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol [2-AG]) in extracts of the cells and cell incubation buffer were increased by PMSF pre-treatment. Depolarization with KCl significantly decreased the amount of anandamide and 2-AG in PMSF-treated CGCs. These results suggest that endogenous cannabinoids inhibit neurotransmitter release in CGCs, which may also release endocannabioids upon neural stimulation.

Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol from Cannabis sativa is mimicked by cannabimimetic analogs such as CP55940 and WIN55212-2, and antagonized by rimonabant and SR144528, through G-protein-coupled receptors, CB1 in the brain, and CB2 in the immune system. Eicosanoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are the "endocannabinoid" agonists for these receptors. CB1 receptors are abundant in basal ganglia, hippocampus and cerebellum, and their functional activity can be mapped during behaviors using cerebral metabolism as the neuroimaging tool. CB1 receptors couple to G(i/o) to inhibit cAMP production, decrease Ca2+ conductance, increase K+ conductance, and increase mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Functional activation of G-proteins can be imaged by [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography. Post-synaptically generated endocannabinoids form the basis of a retrograde signaling mechanism referred to as depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) or excitation (DSE). Under circumstances of sufficient intracellular Ca2+ (e.g., burst activity in seizures), synthesis of endocannabinoids releases a diffusible retrograde messenger to stimulate presynaptic CB1 receptors. This results in suppression of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release, thereby relieving the post-synaptic inhibition. Tolerance develops as neurons adjust both receptor number and cellular signal transduction to the chronic administration of cannabinoid drugs. Future therapeutic drug design can progress based upon our current understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of CB1, CB2 and related receptors. One very important role for CB1 antagonists will be in the treatment of craving in the disease of substance abuse.

The effects of chronic Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol on cannabinoid receptor levels and receptor-G-protein coupling were investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused continuously with low or high dose regimens of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol or vehicle for 4 days. Following treatment, rats were sacrificed for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor binding analysis or challenged with the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl (SR141716A). The rats receiving Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol exhibited antagonist-precipitated withdrawal signs. Each brain region (cerebellum, cortex, hippocampus and basal ganglia) from high-dose rats showed 30-70% decreases in [3H] (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)cyclohexanol (WIN55212-2) B(max) values, indicating receptor down-regulation. Most regions showed decreased WIN55212-2-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-3-thiotriphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding, indicating desensitization of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. Additional receptor binding assays in cerebellar membranes showed a significantly greater decrease in agonist than in antagonist B(max) values, indicating a lower fraction of coupled receptors after treatment. Concentration-effect analysis of five agonists revealed that the treatment resulted in greater decreases in the efficacy of low-efficacy agonists.

Dibenzopyran (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) and aminoalkylindole [R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate; (WIN55,212-2)] cannabinoids suppress vomiting produced by cisplatin via cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. This study investigates the antiemetic potential of the "nonclassical" cannabinoid CP55,940 [1alpha,2beta-(R)-5alpha]-(-)-5-(1,1-dimethyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexyl-phenol] against cisplatin-induced vomiting and assesses the presence and functionality of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) brain. CP55,940 (0.025-0.3 mg/kg) reduced both the frequency of cisplatin-induced emesis (ID(50)=0.025 mg/kg) and the percentage of shrews vomiting (ID(50)=0.09 mg/kg). CP55,940 also suppressed shrew motor behaviors (ID(50)=0.06- 0.21 mg/kg) at such doses. The antiemetic and motor-suppressant actions of CP55,940 were countered by SR141716A [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide], indicating both effects are cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated. Autoradiographic studies with [3H]-SR141716A and [35S]-GTPgammaS binding revealed that the distribution of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and its activation pattern are similar to rodent brain and significant levels are present in brain loci (e.g., nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)) that control emesis. The affinity rank order of structurally diverse cannabinoid ligands for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in shrew brain is similar to rodent brain: HU-210=CP55,940=SR141716A>/=WIN55,212-2>/=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol>methanandamide=HU-211=cannabidiol=2-arachidonoylglycerol. This affinity order is also similar and is highly correlated to the cannabinoid EC(50) potency rank order for GTPgammaS stimulation except WIN55,212-2 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol potency order were reversed. The affinity and the potency rank order of tested cannabinoids were significantly correlated with their antiemetic ID(50) potency order against cisplatin-induced vomiting (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) as well as emesis produced by 2-arachidonoylglycerol or SR141716A (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2>delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).

The purpose of these studies was to support the hypothesis that an undiscovered cannabinoid receptor exists in brain. [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding was stimulated by anandamide and WIN55212-2 in brain membranes from both CB(1)(+/+) and CB(1)(-/-) mice. In contrast, a wide variety of other compounds that are known to activate CB(1) receptors, including CP55940, HU-210, and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, failed to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in CB(1)(-/-) membranes. In CB(1)(-/-) membranes, SR141716A affected both basal and anandamide- or WIN55212-2-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding only at concentrations greater than 1 microM. In CB(1)(+/+) membranes, SR141716A inhibited only 84% of anandamide and 67% of WIN55212-2 stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding with an affinity appropriate for mediation by CB(1) receptors (K(B) approximately 0.5 nM). The remaining stimulation seemed to be inhibited with lower potency (IC(50) approximately 5 microM) similar to that seen in CB(1)(-/-) membranes or in the absence of agonist. Further experiments determined that the effects of anandamide and WIN55212-2 were not additive, but that the effect of mu opioid, adenosine A1, and cannabinoid ligands were additive. Finally, assays of different central nervous system (CNS) regions demonstrated significant activity of cannabinoids in CB(1)(-/-) membranes from brain stem, cortex, hippocampus, diencephalon, midbrain, and spinal cord, but not basal ganglia or cerebellum. Moreover, some of these same CNS regions also showed significant binding of [(3)H]WIN55212-2, but not [(3)H]CP55940. Thus anandamide and WIN55212-2 seemed to be active in CB(1)(-/-) mouse brain membranes via a common G protein-coupled receptor with a distinct CNS distribution, implying the existence of an unknown cannabinoid receptor subtype in brain.

Heterozygous CB1 receptor knockout mice were used to examine the effect of reduced CB1 receptor density on G-protein activation in membranes prepared from four brain regions: cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum/globus pallidus (striatum/GP) and cingulate cortex. Results showed that CB1 receptor levels were approximately 50% lower in heterozygous mice in all regions examined. However, maximal stimulation of [(35)S]guanosine-5'-(gamma-O-thio) triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding by the high efficacy agonist WIN 55,212-2 was reduced by only 20-25% in most brain regions, with the exception of striatum/GP where the decrease in stimulation was as predicted (approximately 50%). Furthermore, although the efficacies of the cannabinoid partial agonists, methanandamide and (9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, were similarly lower in heterozygous mice, their relative efficacies compared with WIN 55,212-2 were generally unchanged. Saturation analysis of net WIN 55,212-2-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding showed that decreased stimulation by WIN 55,212-2 in striatum/GP of heterozygous mice was caused by a decrease in the apparent affinity of net-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. The apparent maximal number of binding sites (B(max)) values of net WIN 55,212-2-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding were unchanged in cerebellum and striatum/GP of heterozygous mice, but decreased in cingulate cortex, with a similar trend in hippocampus. Moreover, in every region except cingulate cortex, the maximal number of net-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding sites per receptor was significantly increased in heterozygous mice. These results indicate region-dependent increases in the apparent efficiency of CB1 receptor-mediated G-protein activation in heterozygous CB1 knockout mice.

Anandamide [arachidonylethanolamide (AEA)] appears to be an endogenous agonist of brain cannabinoid receptors (CB(1)), yet some of the neurobehavioral effects of this compound in mice are unaffected by a selective CB(1) antagonist. We studied the levels, pharmacological actions, and degradation of AEA in transgenic mice lacking the CB(1) gene. We quantified AEA and the other endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, in six brain regions and the spinal cord by isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The distribution of endocannabinoids and their inactivating enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase, were found to overlap with CB(1) distribution only in part. In CB(1) knockout homozygotes (CB(1)-/-), the hippocampus and, to a lesser extent, the striatum exhibited lower AEA levels as compared with wild-type (CB(1)+/+) controls. These data suggest a ligand/receptor relationship between AEA and CB(1) in these two brain regions, where tonic activation of the receptor may tightly regulate the biosynthesis of its endogenous ligand. 2-Arachidonoyl glycerol levels and fatty acid amide hydrolase activity were unchanged in CB(1)-/- with respect to CB(1)+/+ mice in all regions. AEA and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were tested in CB(1)-/- mice for their capability of inducing analgesia and catalepsy and decreasing spontaneous activity. The effects of AEA, unlike THC, were not decreased in CB(1)-/- mice. AEA, but not THC, stimulated GTPgammaS binding in brain membranes from CB(1)-/- mice, and this stimulation was insensitive to CB(1) and CB(2) antagonists. We suggest that non-CB(1), non-CB(2) G protein-coupled receptors might mediate in mice some of the neuro-behavioral actions of AEA.

To investigate differences in agonist affinity, potency, and efficacy across rat brain regions, five representative cannabinoid compounds were investigated in membranes from three different rat brain regions for their ability to maximally stimulate [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding and bind to cannabinoid receptors (measured by inhibition of [(3)H]antagonist binding) under identical assay conditions. In all three brain regions, the rank order of potency for the stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and the inhibition of [(3)H]SR141716A binding for these compounds were identical, with CP55940 approximately levonantradol > WIN55212-2 >/= Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) > methanandamide. The rank order of efficacy was not related to potency, and relative maximal agonist effects varied across regions. Receptor binding fit to a three-site model for most agonists, stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding fit to a two-site model for all agonists, and high-affinity receptor binding did not appear to produce any stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. WIN55212-2, methanandamide, and Delta(9)-THC also were assayed for the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in cerebellar membranes. The rank orders of potency and efficacy were similar to those for [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, but the efficacies and potencies of methanandamide and Delta(9)-THC compared with WIN55212-2 were higher for adenylyl cyclase inhibition, implying receptor/G-protein reserve.

Previous studies had shown that the amplification factors for cannabinoid receptors, defined as the number of total G proteins activated per occupied receptor, differs between several rat brain regions. In this study, we sought to determine which specific Gi/Go(alpha) subunits were activated by CB1 receptors in several rat brain regions and if this coupling might explain the regional differences in receptor/G protein amplification factors. Furthermore, we examined whether cannabinoid agonists might activate different subtypes of G(alpha) subunits with varying degrees of efficacy and/or potency. Activation of specific G proteins by cannabinoid receptors was evaluated by the ability of the agonist WIN 55212-2 to stimulate incorporation of [alpha-(32)P]azidoanilido-GTP into G(alpha) subunits in membranes. Photolabeled G proteins were either directly resolved using urea/SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or first immunoprecipitated with specific antisera for different G(alpha) subunits before electrophoresis. Individual G(alpha) subunits were separated into distinct bands on a single gel and the amount of agonist-induced increase in radioactivity was quantified by densitometry. Stimulation of CB1 receptors by WIN 55212-2 resulted in the activation of a distinct pattern of at least five different G(ialpha)/G(oalpha) subunits in several brain regions. Furthermore, although the pattern of G proteins activated by WIN 55212-2 appeared to be similar across brain regions, slight differences were observed in both the percentage of increase and the amount of the individual G(alpha) subunits activated. Most importantly, the amount of WIN 55212-2 required to half-maximally activate individual G proteins in the cerebellum varied over a 30-fold range for different G(alpha) subunits. These results suggest that cannabinoid receptors activate multiple G proteins simultaneously in several brain regions and both the efficacy and potency of cannabinoid agonists to activate individual G(alpha) subunits may vary considerably.

Chronic treatment of rats with delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) results in tolerance to its acute behavioral effects. In a previous study, 21-day delta9-THC treatment in rats decreased cannabinoid activation of G proteins in brain, as measured by in vitro autoradiography of guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. The present study investigated the time course of changes in cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and cannabinoid receptor binding in both brain sections and membranes, following daily delta9-THC treatments for 3, 7, 14, and 21 days. Autoradiographic results showed time-dependent decreases in WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS and [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding in cerebellum, hippocampus, caudate-putamen, and globus pallidus, with regional differences in the rate and magnitude of down-regulation and desensitization. Membrane binding assays in these regions showed qualitatively similar decreases in WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and cannabinoid receptor binding (using [3H]SR141716A), and demonstrated that decreases in ligand binding were due to decreases in maximal binding values, and not ligand affinities. These results demonstrated that chronic exposure to delta9-THC produced time-dependent and region-specific down-regulation and desensitization of brain cannabinoid receptors, which may represent underlying biochemical mechanisms of tolerance to cannabinoids.

The effects of the primary psychoactive constituent of marijuana, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, are mediated by cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2. The CB1 receptors display a unique central nervous system (CNS) distribution and are present in mammalian brain at higher levels than most other known G-protein-coupled receptors. The highest levels occur in several areas involved in motor control and hippocampus. Cannabinoid effects on CNS activities, including movement, memory, nociception, endocrine regulation, thermoregulation, sensory perception, cognitive functions, and mood, correlate with the regional distribution of cannabinoid receptors and their activation of specific G-protein-mediated signal transduction systems in various brain regions.

The relationship between GDP and cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding was investigated in rat cerebellar membranes. Kinetic analyses showed that [35S]GTPgammaS binding reached steady-state levels and that the association rate was increased by the agonist WIN 55212-2 proportional to the concentration of GDP. Dissociation of [35S]GTPgammaS occurred with two rates (t1/2 = 7 and 170 min), and WIN 55212-2 increased the proportion of sites exhibiting the faster rate. Without GDP, [35S]GTPgammaS bound to membranes with high and low affinity, and WIN 55212-2 had no effect. With 30 microM GDP, [35S]GTPgammaS bound to low and intermediate affinity sites, and WIN 55212-2 induced high affinity [35S]GTPgammaS binding without affecting low affinity sites. GDP competed for high affinity [35S]GTPgammaS binding with high and intermediate affinity in the absence of WIN 55212-2 and with high and low affinity in the presence of WIN 55212-2. Cannabinoid ligands displayed differential abilities to maximally stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the presence of GDP. Efficacy differences among ligands increased with increasing GDP concentrations. GDP competition curves revealed that agonists induced low affinity GDP Ki values that were proportional to agonist Emax values, indicating that agonist efficacy is determined by displacement of GDP from G-proteins.

Gi/Go proteins are uncoupled from receptors by ADP-ribosylation with pertussis toxin (PTX). However, PTX treatment of delta opioid receptor-containing NG108-15 cells reduces, but does not eliminate, opioid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The present study explored potential mechanisms of this residual inhibition. Overnight treatment of NG108-15 cells with 100 ng/ml PTX eliminated both PTX-catalyzed [adenylyl-32P]NAD+-labeling of G proteins and agonist stimulation of low Km GTPase in membranes. Although PTX-treatment decreased the maximal opioid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by 50-65%, the inhibition that remained was concentration-dependent and antagonist-reversible. This inhibition persisted in the absence of GTP (even though opioid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in untreated membranes was GTP-dependent), but was eliminated by hydrolysis-resistant guanine nucleotide analogs, indicating that G-proteins were still involved in the coupling mechanism. However, assays of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the presence of excess GDP indicated that PTX pretreatment eliminated stimulation of guanine nucleotide exchange by opioid agonists. These results suggest that in membranes from PTX-treated NG108-15 cells, a subpopulation of G proteins may transduce an inhibitory signal from agonist-bound opioid receptors without involvement of guanine nucleotide exchange.

Cannabinoid receptor activation of G-proteins can be measured by WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Receptor/transducer amplification factors, interpreted as the number of G-proteins activated per occupied receptor, are the ratio of the apparent B(max) of net agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to the B(max) of receptor binding. The present study examined whether amplification factors for cannabinoid receptors differ among various rat brain regions. In autoradiographic studies with [3H]WIN 55212-2 and WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding, some regions displayed different relative levels of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding than receptor binding. To quantify amplification factors, membranes from different brain regions were assayed by saturation binding analysis of net WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS, [3H]SR141716A (antagonist) and [3H]WIN 55212-2 (agonist) binding. For [3H]SR141716A binding, amplification factors varied significantly from 2.0 (frontal cortex) to 7.5 (hypothalamus). For [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding, amplification factors ranged from 2.4 (hippocampus) to 5.5 (thalamus). Comparison of receptor binding and G-protein activation at subsaturating concentrations of WIN 55212-2 indicated that amplification factors may vary with receptor occupancy in some regions like cerebellum. Ratios between high-affinity [3H]WIN 55212-2 B(max) and [3H]SR141716A B(max) also differed significantly among brain regions. These results demonstrate that G-protein coupling by cannabinoid receptors differs among brain regions, and therefore depends on the cellular environment.

To compare activation of G proteins by opioid receptors, opioid agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding in the presence of excess GDP was assayed in membranes from NG108-15 (delta) and SK-N-SH (primarily mu) cells. Basal [35S]GTP gamma S binding consisted of a single class of low-affinity sites (KD 400-500 nM). Addition of agonists produced a high-affinity site 100-300-fold higher in affinity than the basal site. The receptor/transducer amplification factor (ratio of activated G protein Bmax to opioid receptor Bmax) was 10-fold higher for SK-N-SH mu receptors than for NG108-15 delta receptors. Chronic delta agonist ([D-Ser2]-Leu-enkephalin-Thr; DSLET) treatment of NG108-15 cells resulted in an 80% loss of DSLET-stimulated [35S]-GTP gamma S binding within 1 h. Morphine treatment of SK-N-SH cells decreased mu agonist ([D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin; DAMGO)-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding by 45% after 16 h, with no effect after 1 h. Loss of agonist response was due to a decrease in the Bmax of activated G proteins with no change in the KD. These results provide a quantitative description of G protein activation occurring on acute and chronic exposure to opioid agonists.

The nucleus locus coeruleus is involved in the expression of opiate physical dependence and withdrawal, and has been characterized extensively with regard to chronic morphine-induced alterations in biochemical and electrophysiological responses. In the present study the effects of chronic morphine treatment on opioid receptor-coupled G-protein activity was investigated in membranes from rat locus coeruleus. Opioid agonists stimulated low Km GTPase activity with pharmacology consistent with mu receptors. Chronic morphine treatment resulted in decreases in both basal and opioid-stimulated low Km GTPase activity, with no change in the percent stimulation by agonist. The decrease in low Km GTPase activity appeared to be due to a decrease in the Vmax of the enzyme, with no change in the Km for GTP hydrolysis. These results were confirmed by assays of basal and opioid receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in the presence of excess GDP. Thus, chronic morphine treatment apparently decreased inhibitory G-protein activity in the locus coeruleus without producing any detectable desensitization. These results suggest a potential adaptation at the receptor/transducer level which may contribute to other biochemical changes produced in the locus coeruleus by chronic morphine treatment.

Low-pH pretreatment increases opioid agonist efficacy in inhibiting adenylyl cyclase in brain membranes. The mechanism of this effect was examined in membranes from cultured NG108-15 cells. Pretreatment of NG108-15 membranes at pH 4.5 before assay at pH 7.4 produced the following modifications in G protein-mediated signal transduction: 1) decreased activation of adenylyl cyclase by Gs, 2) increased maximal inhibition of opioid agonist binding by sodium and by guanine nucleotides in the presence of sodium, and 3) increased maximal inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by agonists for G(i)-coupled receptors. These results are similar to those previously observed in rat brain membranes. The mechanism by which low-pH pretreatment increased receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was investigated further by examining low-Km GTPase activity in low-pH-pretreated NG108-15 cell membranes. Low-pH pretreatment decreased basal and agonist-stimulated low-Km GTPase activity maximally in the absence of sodium and minimally in the presence of 120 mM NaCl. This change was due to a decrease in the Vmax of the enzyme, with no change in the Km for GTP, indicating that GTP hydrolysis was decreased without any decrease in the affinity of the G protein for GTP. Scatchard analysis revealed no decrease in the Bmax for high affinity opioid agonist binding, and Western blot analysis with a G(i)-specific antibody revealed no loss of G(i) protein, in low-pH-pretreated membranes. Moreover, concentration-effect curves for GTP in supporting opioid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase showed that low-pH pretreatment increased inhibition by the agonist only at GTP concentrations equal to or greater than the Km for GTP hydrolysis by the low-Km GTPase. Taken together, these results indicate that the efficacy of receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase can be increased by decreasing the maximal inactivation rate of G(i) subsequent to its activation by the receptor.