1. Comparison of sample characteristics in two pregnancy cohorts: community-based versus population-based recruitment methods
- Author
-
Brenda My, Leung, Sheila W, McDonald, Bonnie J, Kaplan, Gerald F, Giesbrecht, and Suzanne C, Tough
- Subjects
Adult ,Cohort Studies ,Canada ,Pregnancy ,Patient Selection ,Community-based ,Humans ,Female ,Participant characteristics ,Population-based ,Recruitment strategy ,Research Article - Abstract
Background One of the biggest challenges for population health studies is the recruitment of participants. Questions that investigators have asked are “who volunteers for studies?” and “does recruitment method influence characteristics of the samples?” The purpose of this paper was to compare sample characteristics of two unrelated pregnancy cohort studies taking place in the same city, in the same time period, that employed different recruitment strategies, as well as to compare the characteristics of both cohorts to provincial and national statistics derived from the Maternity Experiences Survey (MES). Methods One pregnancy cohort used community-based recruitment (e.g. posters, pamphlets, interviews with community media and face-to-face recruitment in maternity clinics); the second pregnancy cohort used both community-based and population-based (a centralized system identifying pregnant women undergoing routine laboratory testing) strategies. Results The pregnancy cohorts differed in education, income, ethnicity, and foreign-born status (p
- Published
- 2013