Search

The MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial is the first prospective study for valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC), mitral valve-in-ring (MViR), and mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves. Procedural outcomes beyond 1 year are not well described.This study evaluated 2-year outcomes in ViMAC, MViR, and MViV in the MITRAL trial.This multicenter prospective study enrolled patients with severe MAC, prior failed mitral annuloplasty ring repair, or prior failed bioprosthetic MV replacement who were at high surgical risk at 13 U.S. sites.Between February 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, 91 patients were enrolled (31 with ViMAC, 30 with MViR, and 30 with MViV). In the ViMAC group, 2-year all-cause mortality was 39.3%, 66.7% were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I-II, and mean MV gradient was 5.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg. In the MViR group, 2-year all-cause mortality was 50%, 65% were NYHA functional class I-II, and mean MV gradient was 6.5 ± 2.7 mm Hg. In the MViV group, 2-year all-cause mortality was 6.7%, 85% were NYHA functional class I-II, and mean MV gradient was 6.9 ± 2.4 mm Hg. At 2 years, all patients had ≤mild mitral regurgitation and survivors in all 3 arms showed sustained improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores compared to baseline.Use of balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves in selected patients with severe MAC, failed annuloplasty ring, and bioprosthetic MV dysfunction is associated with improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and stable prosthesis function at 2-year follow-up. Between 1 and 2 years, the MViR group experienced higher mortality rates than the MViV and ViMAC groups.

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, mechanisms of failure, and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explantation. Background Surgical explantation following TAVR may be required for structural valve degeneration, paravalvular leak, infection, or other reasons. However, in-depth data on indications and outcomes are lacking. Methods Data from a multicenter, international registry (EXPLANT-TAVR) of patients who underwent TAVR explantation were reviewed retrospectively. Explantations performed during the same admission as initial TAVR were excluded. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated. Median follow-up duration was 6.7 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-18.8 months) after TAVR explantation and was 97.7% complete at 30 days and 86.1% complete at 1 year. Results From November 2009 to September 2020, 269 patients across 42 centers with a mean age of 72.7 ± 10.4 years underwent TAVR explantation. About one quarter (25.9%) were deemed low surgical risk at index TAVR, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk at TAVR explantation was 5.6% (IQR: 3.2%-9.6%). The median time to explantation was 11.5 months (IQR: 4.0-32.4 months). Balloon-expandable and self-expanding or mechanically expandable valves accounted for 50.9% and 49.1%, respectively. Indications for explantation included endocarditis (43.1%), structural valve degeneration (20.1%), paravalvular leak (18.2%), and prosthesis-patient mismatch (10.8%). Redo TAVR was not feasible because of unfavorable anatomy in 26.8% of patients. Urgent or emergency cases were performed in 53.1% of patients, aortic root replacement in 13.4%, and 54.6% had concomitant cardiac procedures. Overall survival at last follow-up was 76.1%. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates were 11.9%, 13.1%, and 28.5%, respectively, and stroke rates were 5.9%, 8.6%, and 18.7%, respectively. Conclusions The EXPLANT-TAVR registry reveals that surgical risks associated with TAVR explantation are not negligible and should be taken into consideration in the lifetime management of aortic stenosis.

Despite advances in anticoagulation, the persistent risk of stroke, bleeding, patient compliance, and other major adverse cardiovascular events leaves a tremendous and persistent unmet clinical nee...

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is prevalent and undertreated, with mortality and morbidity increasing with TR severity. Given poor outcomes with medical therapy and high in-hospital mortality for isolated tricuspid valve surgery, emerging transcatheter repair devices offer a promising alternative.The Edwards Cardioband Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System Early Feasibility study (NCT03382457) evaluates the treatment of functional TR via annular reduction with the Cardioband Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System (Edwards Lifesciences).Patients with ≥ moderate functional TR were eligible for this prospective, single-arm multicenter study. At 1 year, patients were evaluated for echocardiographic parameters, clinical and quality-of-life measures, and major adverse events.The 37 patients enrolled had a mean age of 78 years; 76% were female; and they had ≥ severe functional (97.3%) or mixed (2.7%) TR, atrial flutter/fibrillation (97%), and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (65%). At 1 year, 73.0% achieved ≤ moderate TR (P 0.0001), and 73.1% had ≥2 grade reductions. Echocardiography showed significant reductions in the tricuspid annulus diameter (P 0.0001), mean vena contracta (P 0.0001), proximal isovelocity surface area effective regurgitant orifice area (P 0.0001), right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P 0.0001), and inferior vena contracta (P = 0.0006). New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly (P 0.0001), with 92.3% achieving class I/II, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores improved by 19.0 points (P 0.0001). One-year cardiovascular mortality was 8.1%, reinterventions were necessary in 5.4%, major access site complications occurred in 8.1%, and severe bleeding was noted in 35.1% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and freedom from heart failure rehospitalization were 85.9% and 88.7%, respectively.One-year experience using the Cardioband system for tricuspid valve repair shows high survival and low rehospitalization rates with durable outcomes in TR reduction and echocardiographic, clinical, and quality-of-life outcomes.

We sought to determine outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus root replacement after transcatheter AVR (TAVR) explantation because they remain unknown.From November 2009 to September 2020, data from the EXPLANT-TAVR International Registry of patients who underwent TAVR explant were retrospectively reviewed, divided by AVR versus root replacement. After excluding explants performed during the same admission as the initial TAVR and concomitant procedures involving the other valves, 168 AVR cases were compared with 28 root replacements, and outcomes were reported at 30 days and 1 year.Among 196 patients (mean age, 73.5 ± 9.9 years) who had primary aortic valve intervention at TAVR explant, the median time from TAVR to surgical explant was 11.2 months (interquartile range, 4.4-32.9 months). Indications for explant were similar between the 2 groups. Compared with AVR, patients requiring root replacement had fewer comorbidities but more unfavorable anatomy for redo TAVR (52.6% vs 26.4%; P = .032), fewer urgent/emergency cases (32.1% vs 58.3%; P = .013), longer median interval from index TAVR to TAVR explant (17.6 vs 9.9 months; P = .047), and more concomitant ascending aortic replacement (58.8% vs 14.0%; P .001). Median follow-up was 6.9 months (interquartile range, 1.4-21.6 months) after TAVR explant and 97.4% complete. Overall survival at follow-up was 81.2% with no differences between groups (log rank P = .54). In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates and stroke rates were not different between the 2 groups.In the EXPLANT-TAVR Registry, AVR and root replacement groups had different clinical characteristics, but no differences in short-term mortality and morbidities. Further investigations are necessary to identify patients at risk of root replacement in TAVR explant.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor remains standard treatment for patients undergoing PCI, and clopidogrel remains the most used agent. Many patients (pts) are genetically resistant to clopidogrel and may not receive its full benefit. However, the use of platelet function testing to provide individualized management of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy remains controversial. Therefore, we analyzed the impact of the use of platelet function testing after PCI in a large real-world experience. Methods: We searched Intermountain Healthcare medical records for pts who underwent PCI followed by DAPT. We compared 1-year outcomes (MACE=death, MI, stroke; and repeat revascularization and major bleeding) in those who did, or did not, receive P2Y12 platelet function testing within 90 days. Cox hazard regression analysis was used to determine multivariable hazard ratios. Results: A total of 11,561 pts were included, of which 650 (5.6%) received P2Y12 platelet function testing. Baseline demographics, discharge P2Y12 inhibitor and outcomes are shown in the Table. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis of patients undergoing PCI, a small proportion of the patients received P2Y12 platelet function testing. Platelet function testing was associated with increased utilization of prasugrel or ticagrelor and a statistically lower incidence of 1-year MACE (10.8% vs. 12.4%, adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, p=0.03), with a very low incidence of major bleeding. Further investigation regarding the potential benefits of individualized management of DAPT therapy through P2Y12 platelet function testing may be justified.

Aims Baseline renal dysfunction (RD) adversely impacts outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF) and severe secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Heart failure and MR, in turn, accelerate progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), worsening prognosis. We sought to determine the impact of RD in HF patients with severe MR and the impact of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) on new-onset ESRD and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Methods and results The COAPT trial randomized 614 patients with HF and severe MR to MitraClip plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) vs. GDMT alone. Patients were stratified into three RD subgroups based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2): none (≥60), moderate (30–60), and severe ( Conclusion Baseline RD was common in the HF patients with severe MR enrolled in COAPT and strongly predicted 2-year death and HFH. MitraClip treatment reduced new-onset ESRD and the need for RRT, contributing to the improved prognosis after TMVr.

The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year outcomes of valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC) in the MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial.The MITRAL trial is the first prospective study evaluating the feasibility of ViMAC using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves.A multicenter prospective study was conducted, enrolling high-risk surgical patients with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic severe mitral valve dysfunction at 13 U.S. sites.Between February 2015 and December 2017, 31 patients were enrolled (median age 74.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.3 to 81.0 years], 71% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 6.3% [IQR: 5.0% to 8.8%], 87.1% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Access was transatrial (48.4%), transseptal (48.4%), or transapical (3.2%). Technical success was 74.2%. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) with hemodynamic compromise occurred in 3 patients (transatrial, n = 1; transseptal, n = 1; transapical, n = 1). After LVOTO occurred in the first 2 patients, pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation was implemented to decrease risk in high-risk patients. No intraprocedural deaths or conversions to open heart surgery occurred during the index procedures. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 16.7% (transatrial, 21.4%; transseptal, 6.7%; transapical, 100% [n = 1]; p = 0.33) and at 1 year was 34.5% (transatrial, 38.5%; transseptal, 26.7%; p = 0.69). At 1-year follow-up, 83.3% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.1 mm Hg (IQR: 5.6 to 7.1 mm Hg), and all patients had ≤1+ mitral regurgitation.At 1 year, ViMAC was associated with symptom improvement and stable transcatheter heart valve performance. Pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation may prevent transcatheter mitral valve replacement-induced LVOTO in patients at risk. Thirty-day mortality of patients treated via transseptal access was lower than predicted by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. Further studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy of ViMAC.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip results in marked clinical improvement in some but not all patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and heart failure (HF).This study sought to evaluate the clinical predictors of a major response to treatment in the COAPT trial.Patients with HF and severe MR who were symptomatic on maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were randomly assigned to MitraClip plus GDMT or GDMT alone. Super-responders were defined as those alive without HF hospitalization and with ≥20-point improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary (KCCQ-OS) score at 12 months. Responders were defined as those alive without HF hospitalization and with a 5 to 20-point KCCQ-OS improvement at 12 months. Nonresponders were those who either died, were hospitalized for HF, or had 5-point improvement in KCCQ-OS at 12 months.Among 614 enrolled patients, 41 (6.7%) had missing KCCQ-OS data and could not be classified. At 12 months, there were 79 super-responders (27.2%), 55 responders (19.0%), and 156 nonresponders (53.8%) in the MitraClip arm compared with 29 super-responders (10.2%), 46 responders (16.3%), and 208 nonresponders (73.5%) in the GDMT-alone arm (overall p 0.0001). Independent baseline predictors of clinical responder status were lower serum creatinine and KCCQ-OS scores and treatment assignment to MitraClip. MR grade and estimated right ventricular systolic pressure at 30 days were improved to a greater degree in super-responders and responders but not in nonresponders.Baseline predictors of clinical super-responders in patients with HF and severe secondary MR in the COAPT trial were lower serum creatinine, KCCQ-OS score and MitraClip treatment. Improved MR severity and reduced right ventricular systolic pressure at 30 days are associated with a long-term favorable clinical response after transcatheter mitral valve repair. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [COAPT]; NCT01626079).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for stentless bioprosthetic aortic valves (SBAVs) and to identify predictors of adverse events.ViV TAVR in SBAVs is associated with unique technical challenges and risks.Clinical records and computer tomographic scans were retrospectively reviewed for procedural complications, predictors of coronary obstruction, mortality, and echocardiographic results.Among 66 SBAV patients undergoing ViV TAVR, mortality was 2 of 66 patients (3.0%) at 30 days and 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) at 1 year. At 1 year, left ventricular end-systolic dimension was decreased versus baseline (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 3.0 [2.6 to 3.6] cm vs. 3.7 [3.2 to 4.4] cm; p 0.001). Coronary occlusion in 6 of 66 procedures (9.1%) resulted in myocardial infarction in 2 of 66 procedures (3.0%). Predictors of coronary occlusion included subcoronary implant technique compared with full root replacement (6 of 31, 19.4% vs. 0 of 28, 0%; p = 0.01), short simulated radial valve-to-coronary distance (median [IQR]: 3.4 [0.0 to 4.6] mm vs. 4.6 [3.2 to 6.2] mm; p = 0.016), and low coronary height (7.8 [5.8 to 10.0] mm vs. 11.6 [8.7 to 13.9] mm; p = 0.003). Coronary arteries originated 10 mm above the valve leaflets in 34 of 97 unobstructed coronary arteries (35.1%).TAVR in SBAVs is frequently associated with high-risk coronary anatomy but can be performed with a low risk of death and myocardial infarction, resulting in favorable ventricular remodeling. A subcoronary surgical approach is associated with an increased risk of coronary obstruction.

Myocardial bridge is the most common congenital coronary anomaly. Patients with this anomaly are usually asymptomatic, but it may cause myocardial ischemia that may lead to myocardial infarction. Treatment for myocardial bridge remains controversial. Current recommendations include medical therapy, surgical treatment (unroofing myotomy), coronary artery bypass, and percutaneous coronary stenting. We report two cases of stent fracture following stenting of a myocardial bridge. The risk of stent fracture leading to restenosis and/or stent thrombosis should be considered when assessing the risks and benefits of coronary revascularization of a myocardial bridge. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

This study sought to determine whether outcomes for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) differ between the randomized controlled trial (RCT) and the subsequent NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry of the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial.The PARTNER RCT demonstrated that TAVR with the Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) is noninferior to surgery in high-risk patients and superior to standard therapy for inoperable patients.The inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection, monitoring, and core laboratories were the same for the RCT and NRCA registry. Baseline characteristics, procedural results, and 1-year outcomes were compared between patients undergoing TF-TAVR as part of the RCT and as part of the NRCA registry.In the RCT, 415 patients underwent TF-TAVR, whereas in the NRCA, 1,023 patients did. At 30 days, death, cardiac death, stroke, and transient ischemic attacks were not different in the NRCA registry than in the RCT. Major vascular complications (8.0% vs. 15.7%, p 0.0001) and major bleeding (6.8% vs. 15.3%, p 0.0001) were significantly lower in the NRCA registry. At 1 year, death rates were significantly lower in the NRCA cohort (19.0% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.009) and cardiac death tended to be lower (8.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.12). Stroke or transient ischemic attack (6.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.10) and stroke alone (5.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.13) also tended to be lower.The large NRCA registry demonstrates further improvement in procedural and longer-term outcomes after TF-TAVR when compared with the favorable results from the PARTNER RCT. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).

We undertook the review of all available cases of hypersensitivity reactions after placement of a drug-eluting stent (DES) and classified potential causes.Six months after the approval of the first DES, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported 50 hypersensitivity reactions after stent placement but later concluded these were due to concomitantly prescribed medications such as clopidogrel. Nevertheless, the FDA continued to receive reports of hypersensitivity.Reports available from April 2003 through December 2004 for hypersensitivity-like reactions associated with the sirolimus-eluting stent (CYPHER, Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, Florida) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS, Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) were reviewed. Sources of reports included the FDA's adverse-device-event database, the published literature, and investigators from the Research on Adverse Drug/Device events And Reports (RADAR) project. Causality was assessed using standardized World Health Organization criteria.Of 5,783 reports identified for the DES in the FDA database, 262 unique events included hypersensitivity symptoms. Of these reports, 2 were certainly and 39 unlikely caused by clopidogrel and 1 was certainly, 9 probably, and 13 unlikely caused by the DES. From all sources, we identified 17 distinct cases that were probably or certainly caused by the stent, of which 9 had symptoms that lasted longer than four weeks. Four autopsies confirmed intrastent eosinophilic inflammation, thrombosis, and lack of intimal healing.The FDA reports and autopsy findings suggest that DES may be a cause of systemic and intrastent hypersensitivity reactions that, in some cases, have been associated with late thrombosis and death.