Search

Background and purpose: Oral or intravenous methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day for 5 days) is recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Nonetheless, the optimal dose remains uncertain. We compared clinical and radiological effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of oral methylprednisolone [1250 mg/day (standard high dose)] versus 625 mg/day (lesser high dose), both for 3 days] in MS relapses. Methods: A total of 49 patients with moderate to severe MS relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a pilot, double‐blind, multicentre, non‐inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01986998). The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority of the lesser high dose by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score improvement on day 30 (non‐inferiority margin, 1 point). The secondary endpoints were EDSS score change on days 7 and 90, changes in T1 gadolinium‐enhanced and new/enlarged T2 lesions on days 7 and 30, and safety and QoL results. Results: The primary outcome was achieved [mean (95% confidence interval) EDSS score difference, −0.26 (−0.7 to 0.18) at 30 days (P = 0.246)]. The standard high dose yielded a superior EDSS score improvement on day 7 (P = 0.028). No differences were observed in EDSS score on day 90 (P = 0.352) or in the number of T1 gadolinium‐enhanced or new/enlarged T2 lesions on day 7 (P = 0.401, 0.347) or day 30 (P = 0.349, 0.529). Safety and QoL were good at both doses. Conclusions: A lesser high‐dose oral methylprednisolone regimen may not be inferior to the standard high dose in terms of clinical and radiological response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) management have shifted perspectives on treatment strategies, advocating for the early initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs). This perspective review discusses the rationale, benefits, and challenges associated with early heDMT initiation, reflecting on the obsolescence of the traditional "first-line" and "second-line" treatment classifications. The article emerges from the last update of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of MS. During its development, there was a recognized need to further discuss the concept of treatment lines and the early use of heDMTs. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggests that early heDMT initiation leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced relapse rates, slowed disease progression, and decreased radiological activity, especially in younger patients or those in early disease stages. Despite the historical belief that heDMTs involve more risks and adverse events compared to moderate-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs), some studies have reported comparable safety profiles between early heDMTs and meDMTs, though long-term safety data are still lacking. The review also addresses the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, and preferences, explores the importance of therapeutic inertia, and highlights the evolving landscape of international and national guidelines that increasingly advocate for early intensive treatment approaches. The article also addresses the challenges of ensuring access to these therapies and the importance of further research to establish long-term safety and effectiveness of DMTs in MS., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

To evaluate whether preventive treatment can modify endothelial and oxidative biomarkers of vascular disease risk in patients with high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine. In this observational, prospective pilot study, 88 prophylactic treatment-naïve patients with episodic and chronic migraine and 56 healthy sex/age matched controls underwent ultrasonography exams and blood tests at baseline, and again in the migraine patients after 3 months' treatment with metoprolol or topiramate. Biomarkers for endothelial function and oxidative stress were analyzed. At baseline, patients with migraine in the low-frequency episodic group had differences exclusively in nitrates 17.6 versus 27.33 µM; p = 0.046 compared to the controls. However, when comparing the group comprised of patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine versus controls, statistically significant differences appeared in hsCRP 2.68 versus 1.64 mg/dL; p = 0.049, vWF antigen (133% vs. 110%; p = 0.020, vWF activity (111% vs. 90%; p = 0.010) and isoprostane levels (181 vs. 238 µM; p = 0.05). Only in the chronic migraine subgroup did we found statistically significant differences in CIMT (0.60 vs. 0.54 mm; p = 0.042) which were significantly greater than in the controls. After treatment, patients who respond to preventive treatment exhibited significantly higher levels of nitrates (24.2-13.8 µM; p = 0.022) and nitrites (10.4-3.43 µM; p = 0.002) compared than non-responders. Moreover, biomarker levels improved in treatment-responsive patients with migraine; hsCRP levels decreased from 2.54 to 1.69 mg/dL (p < 0.05), vWF activity levels decreased from 124 to 103 IU/dL (p = 0.003) and prothrombin activity decreased from 1.01 to 0.93 (p = 0.01). These differences were also observed in the high-frequency and chronic migraine subgroup and reach statistical significance in the case of hsCRP, which decreased from 2.12 to 0.83 mg/dL (p = 0.048). Patients with migraines have differences in biomarker levels compared to controls, suggesting endothelial and oxidative dysfunction. The greatest differences in biomarker levels compared to controls are observed in migraine patients in the high-frequency and chronic migraine subgroups. Based on our results, preventive treatment is capable of modifying markers of endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in migraine patients, even in cases of chronic and high-frequency migraine., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: To study the impact of chronic migraine (CM) on the cognition and quality of life (QoL) of patients in the interictal period, and to analyse the degree of reversibility of any observed alterations following the use of preventive treatment., Background: CM is a highly disabling disease, and migraineurs often have associated comorbidities, such as subjective memory problems, that are involved in the development of cognitive impairment. Our hypotheses are that patients suffering from chronic migraine experience objective cognitive alterations that are not only due to the pain that they suffer or their current emotional state. Furthermore, preventive treatment should be capable of reversing, or at least reducing, the impact of CM on the cognition and QoL of migraineurs., Methods: The cognition and QoL of 50 control subjects and 46 patients with CM were assessed using a battery of tests, prior to the use of preventive treatment based on botulinum toxin or oral drugs and after 3 months of this treatment., Results: Compared with controls, patients with CM had lower scores on the assessment of cognitive performance (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test [ROCF] (p<0.05), Trail Making Test [TMT] B) (p < 0.05) and QoL (p < 0.05). Three months after the use of preventive treatment, improvement was observed in all cognitive parameters (p < 0.05) and QoL (p < 0.05), except the ROCF copy task (p = 0.79). No statistically significant differences were observed when these outcomes were compared based on treatment., Conclusions: This study confirms poor cognitive performance that is not explained by migraine pain itself, as it occurs in the interictal period, irrespective of the patient's emotional status. Our findings show that these effects are reversible in some cases with preventive treatment of CM, reaffirming the important impact of this condition on the QoL of these patients, and the need to establish preventive treatment guidelines., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Episodic ataxia type 2 is an autosomal dominant channelopathy, caused by genetic variants in the voltage-dependent calcium channel a-1 subunit (CACNA1A), which is characterized by intermittent episodes of vertigo and ataxia. A slow progression of cerebellar signs is commonly observed in the course of the disease. Treatment with the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide is recommended., Methods: We report the cases of two patients with EA-2 and migraine, linked to a novel CACNA1A mutation associated with disabling ictal and interictal disease, which did not respond to acetazolamide., Results: A 30-year-old woman and a 50-year-old man, who was a ski instructor, reported disabling episodes of rotatory vertigo and progressive interictal ataxia. In both cases, the disease progressed despite treatment with acetazolamide. The concomitant use of topiramate and 4-aminopyridine significantly reduced the frequency and severity of relapses and migraine and improved the interictal cerebellar progression in both cases., Conclusions: We propose combined applications of topiramate and 4-aminopyridine in refractory cases and those with poor tolerance to acetazolamide and also in those with frequent associated migraine. The effectiveness of this combination of drugs for treating intermittent ataxic episodes and interictal signs in EA-2 has not been previously reported., (© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background and Objectives: Masitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting innate immune cells (mast cells and microglia) that are involved in the pathophysiology of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Study AB07002 assessed oral masitinib in patients with progressive MS who were progressing but not clinically active., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, 2 parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial assessing 2 dose levels of masitinib vs equivalent placebo was conducted at 116 hospital clinics and specialized MS centers in 20 countries. Randomization (2:1) with minimization was performed centrally using an automated system. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors remained masked to treatment group allocation. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or nonactive secondary progressive MS (nSPMS) without relapse for ≥2 years, aged 18-75 years, with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.0-6.0, and regardless of time from onset were treated for 96 weeks. The primary end point was overall EDSS change from baseline using repeated measures (generalized estimating equation, timeframe W12-W96, measured every 12 weeks), with positive values indicating increased clinical deterioration. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomly assigned and treated patients., Results: A total of 611 patients were randomized; 301 in the masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d parallel group and 310 in the uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group. Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) (n = 199) showed significant benefit over placebo (n = 101) according to the primary end point, 0.001 vs 0.098, respectively, with a between-group difference of -0.097 (97% CI -0.192 to -0.002); p = 0.0256. Safety was consistent with masitinib's known profile (diarrhea, nausea, rash, and hematologic events), with no elevated risk of infection. Efficacy results from the independent uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group were inconclusive, and no new safety signal was observed., Discussion: Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) can benefit people with PPMS and nSPMS. A confirmatory phase 3 study will be initiated to substantiate these data., Trial Registration Information: The first participant was randomized to study AB07002 on August 25, 2011. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (#EudraCT 2010-021219-17) on July 1, 2011 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2010-021219-17/ES) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01433497) on September 14, 2011 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01433497)., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d decreased progression of disability, measured by the EDSS, in adults with PPMS or patients with nSPMS (with no exacerbations in the last 2 years)., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Cognitive impairment has been reported at all phases and all subtypes of multiple sclerosis. It remains a major cause of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults suffering from the disease. The severity and type of cognitive impairment varies considerably among individuals and can be observed both in early and in later stages. The areas which have commonly shown more deficits are: information processing speed, complex attention, memory, and executive function. Even though an alteration in both the white matter and in the gray matter has been found in patients with multiple sclerosis and cognitive impairment, the underlying process still remains unknown. Standardized neurological examinations fail to detect emerging cognitive deficits and self-reported cognitive complaints by the patients can be confounded by other subjective symptoms. This review is a comprehensive and short update of the literature on cognitive dysfunctions, the possible confounders and the impact of quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.

We studied 56 patients, 30 women and 26 men ranging from 30 to 79 years of age (average age 64.5 +/- 10.4), who were admitted to our hospital between 1982 and August 1995 with clinical features compatible with occlusion at the level of the bifurcation of the basilar artery. The patients were selected following clinical and neuro-radiological criteria. All patients included in the study had two or more recent infarcts in the vertebro-basilar territory, related to involvement of the rostral region of the basilar artery. The diagnosis was confirmed by CT or MR scanning. The infarcts were in the thalamus, brain-stem, cerebellum and parieto-occipital lobe. A thalamic infarct associated with an infarct in another region was the most frequent lesion. The CT-MR findings in the 56 cases were: 29 patients presented with a unilateral thalamic infarct associated with another infarct (23 occipital, 8 parietal, 6 brain-stem and 2 cerebellum). There were eight patients with bilateral thalamic infarcts and seven with bilateral occipital infarcts. In six patients the occipital infarct was associated with another infarct at a different level (parietal or cerebellar) and six patients had cerebellar infarcts together with an infarct of the mid-brain. In 22 of the patients, lesions were found in three or more areas. The commonest clinical findings were: Motor deficit (69.6%), abnormal eye movements (44.5%), cerebellar dysfunction (42.8%), altered level of consciousness (32.1%), visual field defects (28.5%), pupil anomalies (19.6%). The most frequently associated risk factors were: Arterial hypertension (58.9%), a history of ACV (32.1%) and atrial fibrillation (21.4%). Mortality was 5.7%. In contrast to the classical descriptions, motor defecit was the commonest symptom in our series.