1. The Role of Isolated Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in Managing Residual Pivot Shift After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and a New Medial Meniscal Tear.
- Author
-
Hoffer AJ, Brinkman JC, Tummala SV, Economopoulos SC, and Economopoulos KJ
- Abstract
Background: Persistent mildly abnormal knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is an ongoing clinical problem., Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of revision ACLR (rACLR), rACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), or isolated LET in patients with a grade ≥2 pivot shift after ACLR with an intact or partially torn graft and a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear diagnosed after a primary ACLR was performed. Patients were included if they demonstrated a grade ≥2 pivot shift on physical examination with an intact or partially torn ACL graft. Exclusion criteria included complete graft rupture. The senior author's management evolved in a practice change design from rACLR to rACLR with LET, to isolated LET over the study period. The primary outcomes were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 years postoperatively., Results: A total of 47 patients, with 16 in the rACLR group, 12 in the rACLR and LET group, and 19 in the isolated LET group were included. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. At 2 years, the rACLR group IKDC score was 86.1 ± 6.6 and was lower than the rACLR and LET group (91.9 ± 4.4; P = .009; 95% CI, -10.4 to -1.2) and the isolated LET group scores (91.7 ± 3.0; P = .004; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.6). The Lysholm score was lower in the rACLR group (85.8 ± 6.3) when compared with the rACLR and LET group (91.8 ± 4.6; P = .03; 95% CI, -11.8 to -0.39). There was no difference in any Tegner scores at 2 years ( P = .09)., Conclusion: In patients with grade ≥2 pivot shift after an ACLR with an intact or partially torn graft and a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear, the addition of an LET with or without rACLR led to improved PROs compared with an isolated rACLR. An isolated LET in this patient population should be considered an acceptable treatment option., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: A.J.H. has received hospitality payments from Arthrex. J.C.B. has received hospitality payments from Stryker and education payments from ImpactOrtho. S.V.T. has received hospitality payments from Stryker and education payments from ImpactOrtho. K.J.E. has received education payments from Goode Surgical and hospitality payments from Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Western Copernicus Group institutional review board (ref No. 20216101)., (© The Author(s) 2025.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF