Search

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a whole blood, point of care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay for myocardial infarction (MI) compared to central laboratory assays.Consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of ischemia were studied. Serial hs-cTnI testing was based on clinical indication at presentation. Parallel measurements were made using fresh whole blood on Siemens Atellica VTLi POC assay, EDTA plasma on Abbott ARCHITECT i2000 used in practice, and heparin plasma on Siemens Atellica. MI was determined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of MI using 99th percentiles. Sensitivities and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated using 99th percentile URLs.1089 Patients, 418 females and 671 males, were enrolled. There were 91 (8.4%) MIs. At baseline (0 h), POC hs-cTnI assay had a sensitivity of 65.7% (95% CI 47.8-80.9) for females and 67.9% (54.0-79.7) for males and NPV of 96.4% (93.9-98.1) for females and 96.7% (94.9-98.0) for males. At 2 h, sensitivity improved to 82.9% (66.4-93.4) for females and 80.4% (67.6-89.8) for males, while NPV improved to 98.2% (96.1-99.3) and 97.9% (96.3-99.0), respectively. For central laboratory assays, comparable diagnostics were observed at 2 h: females - sensitivity 94.3% (80.8-99.3) for ARCHITECT and 79.4% (62.1-91.3) for Atellica, and NPV 99.3% (97.6-99.9) and 98.0% (95.8-99.2), respectively; males - sensitivity 87.5% (75.9-94.8) for ARCHITECT and 80.4% (67.6-89.8) for Atellica, NPVs of 98.7% (97.3-99.5) and 97.9% (96.3-99.0), respectively.The POC, whole blood Atellica VTLi hs-cTnI assay demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy for MI to central laboratory assays using 99th percentiles.

Our purpose was to determine a) overall and sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits (URL) and b) influences of statistical methods and comorbidities on the URLs.Heparin plasma from 838 normal subjects (423 men, 415 women) were obtained from the AACC (Universal Sample Bank). The cobas e602 measured cTnT (Roche Gen 5 assay); limit of detection (LoD), 3ng/L. Hemoglobin A1c (URL 6.5%), NT-proBNP (URL 125ng/L) and eGFR (60mL/min/1.73m355 men and 339 women remained after exclusions. Overall50% of subjects had measureable concentrations ≥ LoD: 45.6% no exclusion, 43.5% after exclusion; compared to men: 68.1% no exclusion, 65.1% post exclusion; women: 22.7% no exclusion, 20.9% post exclusion. The statistical method used influenced URLs as follows: pre/post exclusion overall, NP 16/16ng/L, HDE 17/17ng/L, R not available; men NP 18/16ng/L, HDE 21/19ng/L, R 16/11ng/L; women NP 13/10ng/L, HDE 14/14ng/L, R not available.We demonstrated that a) the Gen 5 cTnT assay does not meet the IFCC guideline for high-sensitivity assays, b) surrogate biomarkers significantly lowers the URLs and c) statistical methods used impact URLs. Our data suggest lower sex-specific cTnT 99th percentiles than reported in the FDA approved package insert. We emphasize the importance of detailing the criteria used to include and exclude subjects for defining a healthy population and the statistical method used to calculate 99th percentiles and identify outliers.