Search

PURPOSE: To report planning and acute toxicity data of the first 60 patients treated within a Phase I-II study with moderate hypofractionation by image-guided helical tomotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Various clinical target volumes (CTVs) were defined: CTV1-pelvic nodes; CTV2-upper portion of seminal vesicles; CTV3-lower portion of SV; CTV4-prostate; overlap between planning target volume (PTV) 4 and rectum. Different doses to each PTV were simultaneously delivered in 28 fractions. For 31 low-risk patients: 56.0, 61.6, and 71.4 Gy for PTV2-4, respectively; for 20 intermediate-risk patients: 51.8, 61.6, 65.5, and 74.2 Gy for PTV1-4, respectively; for 9 high-risk patients: 51.8 and 65.5 Gy for PTV1-2 and 74.2 Gy for PTV3-4. For all patients, the dose to overlap was 65.5 Gy. RESULTS: The mean fraction of rectum receiving more than 65 Gy (V65) and rectal Dmax were 10% and 70.8 Gy respectively. In cases of pelvic node irradiation, the intestinal cavity (outside PTV) receiving > 45 and 50 Gy was 86 and 12 cc, respectively. A homogeneous dose distribution within each PTV was guaranteed. Acute genitourinary toxicity according to RTOG scoring system was as follows: 21/60 (35%) Grade 1, 12/60 (20%) Grade 2, 2/60 (3%) Grade 3. Acute rectal toxicities were: 18/60 (30%) Grade 1. Twelve (20%) patients showed Grade 1 upper intestinal toxicity (uGI). No patients experienced >/= Grade 2 acute rectal or uGI side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows excellent results with regard to acute toxicity. Further research is necessary to assess definitive late toxicity and tumor control outcome.

PURPOSE: To compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) treatment plans for nasopharynx cancer using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 6 patients who had previously been treated with HT were used. A three-beam IMPT technique was optimized in the Hyperion treatment planning system, simulating a "beam scanning" technique. HT was planned using the tomotherapy treatment planning system. Both techniques were optimized to simultaneously deliver 66 Gy in 30 fractions to planning target volume (PTV1; GTV and enlarged nodes) and 54 Gy to PTV2 subclinical, electively treated nodes. Normal tissue complication probability calculation was performed for the parotids and larynx. RESULTS: Very similar PTVs coverage and homogeneity of the target dose distribution for IMPT and HT were found. The conformity index was significantly lower for protons than for photons (1.19 vs. 1.42, respectively). The mean dose to the ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands decreased by 6.4 Gy and 5.6 Gy, respectively, with IMPT. The volume of mucosa and esophagus receiving >/=20 Gy and >/=30 Gy with IMPT was significantly lower than with HT. The average volume of larynx receiving >/=50 Gy was significantly lower with HT, while for thyroid, it was comparable. The volume receiving >/=30, >/=20, and >/=10 Gy in total body volume decreased with IMPT by 14.5%, 19.4%, and 23.1%, respectively. The normal tissue complication probability for the parotid glands was significantly lower with IMPT for all sets of parameters; however, we also estimated an almost full recovery of the contralateral parotid with HT. The normal tissue complication probability for the larynx was not significantly different between the two irradiation techniques. CONCLUSION: Excellent target coverage, homogeneity within the PTVs, and sparing of the organs at risk were reached with both modalities. IMPT allows for better sparing of most organs at risk at medium-to-low doses.

PURPOSE: To report on planning and toxicity findings of hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with helical Tomotherapy (HTT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate carcinoma (pCa). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty consecutive patients submitted to RP for pT2R1/pT3a/pT3b-pN0 pCa were enrolled in a Phase I-II trial to receive 58Gy/20 fractions (5/week) on tumoral bed. Endpoint was to verify a risk of toxicity and biochemical failure not exceeding that observed in our Institutional 3DCRT, conventionally fractionated series (153 patients). Toxicities were graded according the RTOG scoring system. RESULTS: Excellent coverage of PTV and high homogeneity of dose distribution were always achieved. Median follow-up was 25 months. Acute G2-3 RTOG genitourinary (GU) and acute G2 intestinal toxicities were similar (12% vs 15.6% and 4% vs 7%, respectively), while acute G2 proctitis was 0% vs 9% in HTT and 3DCRT group, respectively. Similarly, late Grade 2 gastrointestinal sequelae were 0% vs 8.5%. The incidence of late urethral stricture, 8% and 9% in HTT and 3DCRT group, respectively, is comparable to that of RP-only series. CONCLUSIONS: Acute toxicity and early late toxicity outcomes of a moderately hypofractionated regimen with HTT post-RP are excellent. A longer follow-up is needed to fully assess the validity of this approach.

PURPOSE: To assess and quantify the possible benefit deriving from IMRT with Helical Tomotherapy (HTT) delivery to the pelvic nodal area in patients with prostate cancer in terms of reduction of acute and late toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients candidate to radical or postoperative RT on whole pelvis (WPRT) were treated with HTT, while receiving a concomitant boost to the prostate or the prostatic bed (median 74.2 and 72Gy, respectively) within a moderately hypofractionated (28-33 fractions; median HTT duration 44 days) regimen. Median and mean doses to whole pelvis were 52 and 54Gy, respectively. One of the major goals of planning optimisation was to minimize the dose received by the intestinal cavity (IC) outside the nodal PTV. RESULTS: HTT resulted to be very efficient in sparing the IC even at dose levels below 30-35Gy and guaranteed a significant sparing of bladder and rectum even at intermediate-low doses (V20-V40). No acute Grade 3 RTOG toxicity was recorded. Eighteen G1 and two G2 GU acute toxicities, 13 G1 upper GI acute toxicities, 8 G1 and 1 G2 acute proctitis were observed; no patient experienced G2 upper GI toxicity. After a median FU of 11.5 months (>10 in 18 patients) one case of late G3 GU toxicity was reported in one post-prostatectomy treated patient; no G2 late rectal bleeding or other GI toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: WPRT with HTT resulted in a very low incidence of acute Grade 2 and in the disappearance of acute Grade 3 toxicities.