1. Nocturnal bilevel positive airway pressure for the treatment of asthma
- Author
-
Owens, Robert L, Campana, Lisa M, Foster, Alison M, Schomer, Ashley M, Israel, Elliot, and Malhotra, Atul
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology ,Lung ,Asthma ,Clinical Research ,Respiratory ,Adult ,Bronchial Provocation Tests ,Bronchoconstrictor Agents ,Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ,Cross-Over Studies ,Female ,Humans ,Lung Volume Measurements ,Male ,Methacholine Chloride ,Middle Aged ,Outcome Assessment ,Health Care ,Sleep Apnea ,Obstructive ,Sleep ,Lung volumes ,Obstructive sleep apnea ,Positive airway pressure ,Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology ,Neurosciences ,Medical Physiology ,Physiology ,Cardiovascular medicine and haematology ,Medical physiology - Abstract
Nocturnal worsening of asthma may be due to reduced lung volumes and fewer sigh breaths, which have been shown to increase airway resistance and bronchoreactivity. We hypothesized that mimicking deep inspiration using nocturnal mechanical support would improve symptoms in patients with asthma. Subjects with asthma underwent usual care and bilevel positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for 4 weeks, separated by 4 weeks, and methacholine challenge (PC20) and subjective assessments. 13 patients with asthma alone and 8 with asthma + OSA completed the protocol. Change in bronchoreactivity (ratio of Post/Pre PC20) was not significantly different during usual care and bilevel PAP [0.86 (IQR 0.19, 1.82) vs 0.94 (IQR 0.56, 2.5), p = 0.88], nor was the change in Asthma Control Test different: 0.1 ± 2.2 vs. -0.2 ± 2.9, p = 0.79, respectively. Bilevel PAP therapy for four weeks did not improve subjective or objective measures of asthma severity in patients with asthma or those with asthma and OSA, although there was heterogeneity in response.
- Published
- 2020