Search

Gaps remain in our understanding of the contribution of bypass-related practices associated with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions after cardiac surgery. Variability exists in the reporting of bypass-related practices in the peer-reviewed literature. In an effort to create uniformity in reporting, a draft statement outlining proposed minimal criteria for reporting cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-related contributions (i.e., RBC data collection/documentation, clinical considerations for transfusions, equipment details, and clinical endpoints) was presented in conjunction with the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology’s (AmSECT’s) 2014 Quality and Outcomes Meeting (Baltimore, MD). Based on presentations and feedback from the conference, coauthors (n = 14) developed and subsequently voted on each proposed data element. Data elements receiving a total of ≤4 votes were dropped from further consideration, 5–9 votes were considered as “Recommended,” and elements receiving ≥10 votes were considered as “Mandatory.” A total of 52 elements were classified as mandatory, 16 recommended, and 14 dropped. There are 8 mandatory data elements for RBC data collection/documentation, 24 for clinical considerations for transfusions, 13 for equipment details, and 7 for clinical endpoints. We present 52 mandatory data elements reflecting CPB-related contributions to RBC transfusions. Consistency of such reporting would offer our community an increased opportunity to shed light on the relationship between intra-operative practices and RBC transfusions.

The goal of this cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) quality improvement initiative was to maximize hemoglobin nadir concentration by minimizing hemodilution and, in turn, eliminating allogeneic blood product transfusion. The effects of transitioning from “one-size-fits-all” to “right-sized” oxygenators, reservoirs, and arterial–venous tubing loops were evaluated through a 2-year retrospective review of 3852 patient perfusion records. Using a sizing algorithm, derived from manufacturers’ recommendations, we were able to create individualized “right-sized” extracorporeal circuits based on patient body surface area, cardiac index, and target blood flows. Use of this algorithm led to an increase in the percent of algorithm-recommended smaller oxygenators being used from 39% to 63% (p < .01) and an increase in average hemoglobin nadir from 8.38 to 8.76 g/dL (p < .01). Decreased priming volumes led to increased hemoglobin nadir and decreases in allogeneic blood transfusion (p = .048). Patients with similar body surface areas who previously were exposed to larger oxygenators, reservoirs, and arterial–venous loops were now supported with smaller circuits as a result of the use of the right-sized algorithm. Adjustments to the algorithm were made for unique patients and procedural situations including age, gender, and length and type of procedure. Larger heat exchanger surface area oxygenators were used for circulatory arrest procedures as a result of the need for increased heat exchange capability. Despite the generally higher costs of smaller circuits, reduced transfusion-related expenditures and decreased exposure risks justify the use of smaller circuit components. This quality improvement initiative demonstrated that as an integral part of a multidisciplinary, multimodal blood conservation effort, the use of the “right-sized” circuit algorithm can help to elevate hemoglobin nadir during CPB and eliminate allogeneic blood transfusions to patients undergoing CPB.

One of the roles of a professional society is to develop standards and guidelines of practice as an instrument to guide safe and effective patient care. The American Society of Extracorporeal Technology (AmSECT) first published its Essentials for Perfusion Practice, Clinical Function: Conduct of Extracorporeal Circulation in 1993. The International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion (ICEBP), a committee within AmSECT, was tasked with updating this document in 2010. The aim of this report is to describe the method of development and content of AmSECT's new professional standards and guidelines. The ICEBP committee independently evaluated and provided input regarding the current "Essentials and Guidelines." Structural changes were made to the entire document, and a draft document was developed, presented, and circulated to the AmSECT Board of Directors and broader membership for comment. Informed by these reviews, a revised document was then presented to the Society for a membership vote. The final document consists of 15 areas of practice covered by 50 Standards and 38 Guidelines (see Appendix 1) with the first standard focusing on the development of institutional protocols to support their implementation and use. A majority of the membership voted to accept the document (81.2% of the voting membership accepting, 18.8% rejecting). After an audit of the balloting process by AmSECT's Ethics Committee, the results were reported to the membership and the document was officially adopted on July 24, 2013. The Standards and Guidelines will serve as a useful guide for cardiac surgical teams that wish to develop institution-specific standards and guidelines to improve the reliability, safety, and effectiveness of adult cardiopulmonary bypass. The ICEBP recognizes that the development of a Standards and Guidelines statement alone will not change care. Safe, reliable, and effective care will be best served through the development and implementation of institutional protocols based on these standards. AmSECT's Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice reflect the changing landscape of our profession as we work toward a safer and optimal provision of cardiopulmonary bypass for all our patients as well as a work environment that is supportive of delivering this care.standards, guidelines, cardiopulmonary bypass, perfusion, cardiac surgery.