Author: "Brooks-Wilson, A." - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Brooks-Wilson, A."' showing total 1,577 results

Start Over Author "Brooks-Wilson, A."

1,577 results on '"Brooks-Wilson, A."'

1. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma

Author: Saner, Flurina AM, Takahashi, Kazuaki, Budden, Timothy, Pandey, Ahwan, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Zwimpfer, Tibor A, Meagher, Nicola S, Fereday, Sian, Twomey, Laura, Pishas, Kathleen I, Hoang, Therese, Bolithon, Adelyn, Traficante, Nadia, Group, for the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Alsop, Kathryn, Christie, Elizabeth L, Kang, Eun-Young, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Alsop, Jennifer, Beckmann, Matthias W, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, El-Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kristjansdottir, Björg, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Mateoiu, Constantina, Orsulic, Sandra, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark E, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Soong, T Rinda, Steed, Helen, Sukumvanich, Paniti, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Anglesio, Michael S, Berchuck, Andrew, Brenton, James D, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda S, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Goode, Ellen L, DeFazio, Anna, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan J, Bowtell, David DL, and Garsed, Dale W
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Genetics, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Orphan Drug, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Precision Medicine, Human Genome, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, BRCA2 Protein, BRCA1 Protein, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins, Prognosis, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Neoplasm Grading, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Middle Aged, Germ-Line Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).Experimental designRB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss.ResultsRB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1.ConclusionsCo-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Published: 2024

2. Variant ranking pipeline for complex familial disorders

Author: Ralli, Sneha, Vira, Tariq, Robles-Espinoza, Carla Daniela, Adams, David J., and Brooks-Wilson, Angela R.
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

3. Physiological phenotypes have optimal values relevant to healthy aging: sweet spots deduced from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Author: Vishnyakova, Olga, Song, Xiaowei, Rockwood, Kenneth, Elliott, Lloyd T., and Brooks-Wilson, Angela
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

4. Variant ranking pipeline for complex familial disorders

Author: Sneha Ralli, Tariq Vira, Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza, David J. Adams, and Angela R. Brooks-Wilson
Subjects: Medicine, Science
Abstract: Abstract Identifying genetic susceptibility factors for complex disorders remains a challenging task. To analyze collections of small and large pedigrees where genetic heterogeneity is likely, but biological commonalities are plausible, we have developed a weights-based pipeline to prioritize variants and genes. The Weights-based vAriant Ranking in Pedigrees (WARP) pipeline prioritizes variants using 5 weights: disease incidence rate, number of cases in a family, genome fraction shared amongst cases in a family, allele frequency and variant deleteriousness. Weights, except for the population allele frequency weight, are normalized between 0 and 1. Weights are combined multiplicatively to produce family-specific-variant weights that are then averaged across all families in which the variant is observed to generate a multifamily weight. Sorting multifamily weights in descending order creates a ranked list of variants and genes for further investigation. WARP was validated using familial melanoma sequence data from the European Genome-phenome Archive. The pipeline identified variation in known germline melanoma genes POT1, MITF and BAP1 in 4 out of 13 families (31%). Analysis of the other 9 families identified several interesting genes, some of which might have a role in melanoma. WARP provides an approach to identify disease predisposing genes in studies with small and large pedigrees.
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

5. Lifetime ovulatory years and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis

Author: Fu, Zhuxuan, Brooks, Maria Mori, Irvin, Sarah, Jordan, Susan, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Doherty, Jennifer A, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Group, AOCS, Harris, Holly R, Hein, Alexander, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Köbel, Martin, Kotsopoulos, Joanne, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Moysich, Kirsten B, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Qin, Bo, Ramus, Susan J, Riggan, Marjorie J, Rothstein, Joseph H, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sieh, Weiva, Sutphen, Rebecca, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Titus, Linda, van Altena, Anne M, White, Emily, Whittemore, Alice S, Wu, Anna H, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Taylor, Sarah E, Tang, Lu, Songer, Thomas, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Webb, Penelope M, Risch, Harvey A, and Modugno, Francesmary
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Parity, Contraceptives, Oral, Case-Control Studies, AOCS Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundThe role of ovulation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is supported by the consistent protective effects of parity and oral contraceptive use. Whether these factors protect through anovulation alone remains unclear. We explored the association between lifetime ovulatory years (LOY) and EOC.MethodsLOY was calculated using 12 algorithms. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated the association between LOY or LOY components and EOC among 26 204 control participants and 21 267 case patients from 25 studies. To assess whether LOY components act through ovulation suppression alone, we compared beta coefficients obtained from regression models with expected estimates assuming 1 year of ovulation suppression has the same effect regardless of source.ResultsLOY was associated with increased EOC risk (OR per year increase = 1.014, 95% CI = 1.009 to 1.020 to OR per year increase = 1.044, 95% CI = 1.041 to 1.048). Individual LOY components, except age at menarche, also associated with EOC. The estimated model coefficient for oral contraceptive use and pregnancies were 4.45 times and 12- to 15-fold greater than expected, respectively. LOY was associated with high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, and clear cell histotypes (ORs per year increase = 1.054, 1.040, 1.065, and 1.098, respectively) but not mucinous tumors. Estimated coefficients of LOY components were close to expected estimates for high-grade serous but larger than expected for low-grade serous, endometrioid, and clear cell histotypes.ConclusionsLOY is positively associated with nonmucinous EOC. Differences between estimated and expected model coefficients for LOY components suggest factors beyond ovulation underlie the associations between LOY components and EOC in general and for non-HGSOC.
Published: 2023

6. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Köbel, Martin, Kang, Eun‐Young, Weir, Ashley, Rambau, Peter F, Lee, Cheng‐Han, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Meagher, Nicola S, Riggan, Marjorie J, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boisen, Michelle, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Coulson, Penny, Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Deen, Suha, El‐Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Group, AOCS, Fischer, Anna, Gayther, Simon A, Barquin‐Garcia, Arantzazu, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Helena, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Huang, Yajue, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez‐Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer M, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Longacre, Teri A, Lycke, Maria, Mateoiu, Constantina, McCauley, Bryan M, McGuire, Valerie, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Paz‐Ares, Luis, Ramón y Cajal, Teresa, Rothstein, Joseph H, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark E, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Singh, Naveena, Steed, Helen, Storr, Sarah J, Talhouk, Aline, Traficante, Nadia, Wang, Chen, Whittemore, Alice S, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, dos Reis, Francisco J Candido, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, García, María J, Goodman, Marc T, Goode, Ellen L, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kommoss, Stefan, Le, Nhu D, and Martin, Stewart G
Subjects: Reproductive Medicine, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Carcinoma, Endometrioid, ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid, clear cell, TP53, p53, prognosis, AOCS Group, Clinical sciences
Abstract: Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Published: 2023

7. CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Kang, Eun‐Young, Weir, Ashley, Meagher, Nicola S, Farrington, Kyo, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng‐Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Bolithon, Adelyn, Popovic, Gordana, Leung, Betty, Tang, Katrina, Lambie, Neil, Millstein, Joshua, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Ataseven, Beyhan, Barlow, Ellen, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Bösmüller, Hans, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Carney, Michael E, Casablanca, Yovanni, Cazorla‐Jiménez, Alicia, Cohen, Paul A, Conrads, Thomas P, Cook, Linda S, Coulson, Penny, Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine, Cramer, Daniel W, Crowe, Philip, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Darcy, Kathleen M, El‐Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Farrell, Rhonda, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, García, María J, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Group, AOCS, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harrington, Shariska Petersen, Harter, Philipp, Hartmann, Arndt, Hecht, Jonathan L, Heikaus, Sebastian, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Polo, Susanna Hernando, Heublein, Sabine, Hirasawa, Akira, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Horlings, Hugo M, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jewell, Andrea, Jimenez‐Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Khabele, Dineo, Kommoss, Felix KF, Kruitwagen, Roy FPM, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Leung, Yee, Linder, Anna, Loverix, Liselore, Lubiński, Jan, Madan, Rashna, Maxwell, G Larry, Modugno, Francesmary, Neuhausen, Susan L, Olawaiye, Alexander, Olbrecht, Siel, Orsulic, Sandra, Palacios, José, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Quinn, Carmel M, Mohan, Ganendra Raj, Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina, Ruebner, Matthias, and Ryan, Andy
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Transcription Factors, Carcinoma, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Oncogene Proteins, Cyclin E, CCNE1 amplification, cyclin E1 expression, high-grade serous carcinoma, ovarian cancer, prognosis, AOCS Group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Public health
Abstract: BackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.
Published: 2023

8. Engaging parents to reduce youth violence: evidence from a youth justice board pathfinder programme

Author: Caulfield, Laura, Brooks-Wilson, Sarah, Booth, Jane, and Monaghan, Mark
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Increased FOXJ1 protein expression is associated with improved overall survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium Study

Author: Weir, Ashley, Kang, Eun-Young, Meagher, Nicola S, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Ryan, Andy, Singh, Naveena, Widschwendter, Martin, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, Paz-Ares, Luis, Gayarre, Javier, Gilks, Blake C, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Heublein, Sabine, Huang, Yajue, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kommoss, Felix KF, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kraemer, Bernhard, Le, Nhu D, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Ruebner, Matthias, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Steed, Helen, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Traficante, Nadia, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, García, María J, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kommoss, Stefan, Modugno, Francesmary, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sinn, Hans-Peter, Staebler, Annette, Kelemen, Linda E, Ford, Caroline E, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul DP, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Biomarkers, Tumor, Forkhead Transcription Factors, AOCs group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundRecently, we showed a >60% difference in 5-year survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) when stratified by a 101-gene mRNA expression prognostic signature. Given the varied patient outcomes, this study aimed to translate prognostic mRNA markers into protein expression assays by immunohistochemistry and validate their survival association in HGSC.MethodsTwo prognostic genes, FOXJ1 and GMNN, were selected based on high-quality antibodies, correlation with protein expression and variation in immunohistochemical scores in a preliminary cohort (n = 134 and n = 80, respectively). Six thousand four hundred and thirty-four (FOXJ1) and 5470 (GMNN) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian neoplasms (4634 and 4185 HGSC, respectively) represented on tissue microarrays from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium underwent immunohistochemical staining and scoring, then univariate and multivariate survival analysis.ResultsConsistent with mRNA, FOXJ1 protein expression exhibited a linear, increasing association with improved overall survival in HGSC patients. Women with >50% expression had the most favourable outcomes (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91, p 35% GMNN expression showed a trend for better outcomes, though this was not significant.ConclusionWe provide foundational evidence for the prognostic value of FOXJ1 in HGSC, validating the prior mRNA-based prognostic association by immunohistochemistry.
Published: 2023

10. Profiling the immune landscape in mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Author: Meagher, Nicola, Hamilton, Phineas, Milne, Katy, Thornton, Shelby, Harris, Bronwyn, Weir, Ashley, Alsop, Jennifer, Bisinoto, Christiani, Brenton, James, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Chiu, Derek, Cushing-Haugen, Kara, Fereday, Sian, Garsed, Dale, Gayther, Simon, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, Blake, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine, Le, Nhu, Piskorz, Anna, Riggan, Marjorie, Shah, Mitul, Singh, Naveena, Talhouk, Aline, Widschwendter, Martin, Bowtell, David, Candido Dos Reis, Francisco, Cook, Linda, Fortner, Renée, García, María, Harris, Holly, Huntsman, David, Köbel, Martin, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul, Doherty, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael, Pike, Malcolm, Pearce, Celeste, Friedlander, Michael, DeFazio, Anna, Nelson, Brad, Ramus, Susan, and Karnezis, Anthony
Subjects: Immune infiltrate, Mucinous ovarian carcinoma, Rare histotype, Humans, Female, B7-H1 Antigen, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Tumor Microenvironment
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare histotype of ovarian cancer, with low response rates to standard chemotherapy, and very poor survival for patients diagnosed at advanced stage. There is a limited understanding of the MOC immune landscape, and consequently whether immune checkpoint inhibitors could be considered for a subset of patients. METHODS: We performed multicolor immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) on tissue microarrays in a cohort of 126 MOC patients. Cell densities were calculated in the epithelial and stromal components for tumor-associated macrophages (CD68+/PD-L1+, CD68+/PD-L1-), T cells (CD3+/CD8-, CD3+/CD8+), putative T-regulatory cells (Tregs, FOXP3+), B cells (CD20+/CD79A+), plasma cells (CD20-/CD79a+), and PD-L1+ and PD-1+ cells, and compared these values with clinical factors. Univariate and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards assessed overall survival. Unsupervised k-means clustering identified patient subsets with common patterns of immune cell infiltration. RESULTS: Mean densities of PD1+ cells, PD-L1- macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and FOXP3+ Tregs were higher in the stroma compared to the epithelium. Tumors from advanced (Stage III/IV) MOC had greater epithelial infiltration of PD-L1- macrophages, and fewer PD-L1+ macrophages compared with Stage I/II cancers (p = 0.004 and p = 0.014 respectively). Patients with high epithelial density of FOXP3+ cells, CD8+/FOXP3+ cells, or PD-L1- macrophages, had poorer survival, and high epithelial CD79a + plasma cells conferred better survival, all upon univariate analysis only. Clustering showed that most MOC (86%) had an immune depleted (cold) phenotype, with only a small proportion (11/76,14%) considered immune inflamed (hot) based on T cell and PD-L1 infiltrates. CONCLUSION: In summary, MOCs are mostly immunogenically cold, suggesting they may have limited response to current immunotherapies.
Published: 2023

11. A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry

Author: Middha, Pooja, Wang, Xiaoliang, Behrens, Sabine, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thaïs, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dossus, Laure, Dugué, Pierre-Antoine, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Grassmann, Felix, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan E, Harkness, Elaine F, Holleczek, Bernd, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Ingvar, Christian, Isaksson, Karolin, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kurian, Allison W, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L, Larsson, Susanna, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Li, Shuai, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Mulot, Claire, Murphy, Rachel A, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Norman, Aaron, O’Brien, Katie M, Olson, Janet E, Patel, Alpa V, Prentice, Ross, Rees-Punia, Erika, Rennert, Gad, Rhenius, Valerie, Ruddy, Kathryn J, and Sandler, Dale P
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Genomics, Human Genome, Estrogen, Cancer, Women's Health, Genetics, Prevention, Aging, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adult, Female, Humans, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Neoplasms, Bayes Theorem, Genome-Wide Association Study, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Case-Control Studies, Breast cancer, Gene-environment interactions, Genetic epidemiology, European ancestry, CTS Consortium, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide studies of gene-environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer.MethodsAnalyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene-environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs.ResultsAssuming a 1 × 10-5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability
Published: 2023

12. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Ahearn, Thomas U, Zhang, Haoyu, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Milne, Roger L, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Lush, Michael, Wang, Qin, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baten, Adinda, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Alnæs, Grethe I Grenaker, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kauppila, Saila, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N, Krüger, Ute, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Lambrechts, Diether, Lee, Derrick G, Lindblom, Annika, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, MacInnis, Robert J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, and McLean, Catriona
Subjects: Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk, Breast cancer, Etiologic heterogeneity, Genetic predisposition, Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear.MethodsAmong 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes.ResultsEighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate
Published: 2022

13. Genome-wide interaction analysis of menopausal hormone therapy use and breast cancer risk among 62,370 women

Author: Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, Heather A, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, van Veen, Elke M, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara
Subjects: Genetics, Cancer, Aging, Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Estrogen, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Female, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Humans, Male, Menopause, Risk Factors
Abstract: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values
Published: 2022

14. A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry

Author: Pooja Middha, Xiaoliang Wang, Sabine Behrens, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Paul L. Auer, Annelie Augustinsson, Thaïs Baert, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Stig E. Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Angel Carracedo, Jose E. Castelao, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, CTS Consortium, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Laure Dossus, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, A. Heather Eliassen, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine D. Figueroa, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Graham G. Giles, Anna González-Neira, Felix Grassmann, Anne Grundy, Pascal Guénel, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Susan E. Hankinson, Elaine F. Harkness, Bernd Holleczek, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Richard S. Houlston, Anthony Howell, David J. Hunter, Christian Ingvar, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Karolin Isaksson, Helena Jernström, Esther M. John, Michael E. Jones, Rudolf Kaaks, Renske Keeman, Cari M. Kitahara, Yon-Dschun Ko, Stella Koutros, Allison W. Kurian, James V. Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Nicole L. Larson, Susanna Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Shuai Li, Martha Linet, Jolanta Lissowska, Maria Elena Martinez, Tabea Maurer, Anna Marie Mulligan, Claire Mulot, Rachel A. Murphy, William G. Newman, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Aaron Norman, Katie M. O’Brien, Janet E. Olson, Alpa V. Patel, Ross Prentice, Erika Rees-Punia, Gad Rennert, Valerie Rhenius, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Dale P. Sandler, Christopher G. Scott, Mitul Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Ann Smeets, Melissa C. Southey, Jennifer Stone, Rulla M. Tamimi, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Sophia S. Wang, Clarice R. Weinberg, Hans Wildiers, Walter Willett, Stacey J. Winham, Alicja Wolk, Xiaohong R. Yang, M. Pilar Zamora, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Montserrat García-Closas, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Peter Kraft, Roger L. Milne, Sara Lindström, Douglas F. Easton, and Jenny Chang-Claude
Subjects: Breast cancer, Gene-environment interactions, Genetic epidemiology, European ancestry, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract: Abstract Background Genome-wide studies of gene–environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. Methods Analyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene–environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs. Results Assuming a 1 × 10–5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

15. Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among 62,370 Women

Author: Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Marchand, Loic Le, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, A Heather, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, Veen, Elke M van, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara
Subjects: Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Human Genome, Aging, Estrogen, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being
Abstract: Abstract Background: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values
Published: 2021

16. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Martin Köbel, Eun‐Young Kang, Ashley Weir, Peter F Rambau, Cheng‐Han Lee, Gregg S Nelson, Prafull Ghatage, Nicola S Meagher, Marjorie J Riggan, Jennifer Alsop, Michael S Anglesio, Matthias W Beckmann, Christiani Bisinotto, Michelle Boisen, Jessica Boros, Alison H Brand, Angela Brooks‐Wilson, Michael E Carney, Penny Coulson, Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks, Kara L Cushing‐Haugen, Cezary Cybulski, Suha Deen, Mona A El‐Bahrawy, Esther Elishaev, Ramona Erber, Sian Fereday, AOCS Group, Anna Fischer, Simon A Gayther, Arantzazu Barquin‐Garcia, Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj, C Blake Gilks, Helena Gronwald, Marcel Grube, Paul R Harnett, Holly R Harris, Andreas D Hartkopf, Arndt Hartmann, Alexander Hein, Joy Hendley, Brenda Y Hernandez, Yajue Huang, Anna Jakubowska, Mercedes Jimenez‐Linan, Michael E Jones, Catherine J Kennedy, Tomasz Kluz, Jennifer M Koziak, Jaime Lesnock, Jenny Lester, Jan Lubiński, Teri A Longacre, Maria Lycke, Constantina Mateoiu, Bryan M McCauley, Valerie McGuire, Britta Ney, Alexander Olawaiye, Sandra Orsulic, Ana Osorio, Luis Paz‐Ares, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Joseph H Rothstein, Matthias Ruebner, Minouk J Schoemaker, Mitul Shah, Raghwa Sharma, Mark E Sherman, Yurii B Shvetsov, Naveena Singh, Helen Steed, Sarah J Storr, Aline Talhouk, Nadia Traficante, Chen Wang, Alice S Whittemore, Martin Widschwendter, Lynne R Wilkens, Stacey J Winham, Javier Benitez, Andrew Berchuck, David D Bowtell, Francisco J Candido dos Reis, Ian Campbell, Linda S Cook, Anna DeFazio, Jennifer A Doherty, Peter A Fasching, Renée T Fortner, María J García, Marc T Goodman, Ellen L Goode, Jacek Gronwald, David G Huntsman, Beth Y Karlan, Linda E Kelemen, Stefan Kommoss, Nhu D Le, Stewart G Martin, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Paul DP Pharoah, Joellen M Schildkraut, Weiva Sieh, Annette Staebler, Karin Sundfeldt, Anthony J Swerdlow, Susan J Ramus, and James D Brenton
Subjects: ovarian cancer, high‐grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid, clear cell, TP53, p53, Pathology, RB1-214
Abstract: Abstract Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high‐grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi‐institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

17. Distinct germline genetic susceptibility profiles identified for common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes

Author: Berndt, Sonja I., Vijai, Joseph, Benavente, Yolanda, Camp, Nicola J., Nieters, Alexandra, Wang, Zhaoming, Smedby, Karin E., Kleinstern, Geffen, Hjalgrim, Henrik, Besson, Caroline, Skibola, Christine F., Morton, Lindsay M., Brooks-Wilson, Angela R., Teras, Lauren R., Breeze, Charles, Arias, Joshua, Adami, Hans-Olov, Albanes, Demetrius, Anderson, Kenneth C., Ansell, Stephen M., Bassig, Bryan, Becker, Nikolaus, Bhatti, Parveen, Birmann, Brenda M., Boffetta, Paolo, Bracci, Paige M., Brennan, Paul, Brown, Elizabeth E., Burdett, Laurie, Cannon-Albright, Lisa A., Chang, Ellen T., Chiu, Brian C. H., Chung, Charles C., Clavel, Jacqueline, Cocco, Pierluigi, Colditz, Graham, Conde, Lucia, Conti, David V., Cox, David G., Curtin, Karen, Casabonne, Delphine, De Vivo, Immaculata, Diepstra, Arjan, Diver, W. Ryan, Dogan, Ahmet, Edlund, Christopher K., Foretova, Lenka, Fraumeni, Jr, Joseph F., Gabbas, Attilio, Ghesquières, Hervé, Giles, Graham G., Glaser, Sally, Glenn, Martha, Glimelius, Bengt, Gu, Jian, Habermann, Thomas M., Haiman, Christopher A., Haioun, Corinne, Hofmann, Jonathan N., Holford, Theodore R., Holly, Elizabeth A., Hutchinson, Amy, Izhar, Aalin, Jackson, Rebecca D., Jarrett, Ruth F., Kaaks, Rudolph, Kane, Eleanor, Kolonel, Laurence N., Kong, Yinfei, Kraft, Peter, Kricker, Anne, Lake, Annette, Lan, Qing, Lawrence, Charles, Li, Dalin, Liebow, Mark, Link, Brian K., Magnani, Corrado, Maynadie, Marc, McKay, James, Melbye, Mads, Miligi, Lucia, Milne, Roger L., Molina, Thierry J., Monnereau, Alain, Montalvan, Rebecca, North, Kari E., Novak, Anne J., Onel, Kenan, Purdue, Mark P., Rand, Kristin A., Riboli, Elio, Riby, Jacques, Roman, Eve, Salles, Gilles, Sborov, Douglas W., Severson, Richard K., Shanafelt, Tait D., Smith, Martyn T., Smith, Alexandra, Song, Kevin W., Song, Lei, Southey, Melissa C., Spinelli, John J., Staines, Anthony, Stephens, Deborah, Sutherland, Heather J., Tkachuk, Kaitlyn, Thompson, Carrie A., Tilly, Hervé, Tinker, Lesley F., Travis, Ruth C., Turner, Jenny, Vachon, Celine M., Vajdic, Claire M., Van Den Berg, Anke, Van Den Berg, David J., Vermeulen, Roel C. H., Vineis, Paolo, Wang, Sophia S., Weiderpass, Elisabete, Weiner, George J., Weinstein, Stephanie, Doo, Nicole Wong, Ye, Yuanqing, Yeager, Meredith, Yu, Kai, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, Zhang, Yawei, Zheng, Tongzhang, Ziv, Elad, Sampson, Joshua, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Offit, Kenneth, Cozen, Wendy, Wu, Xifeng, Cerhan, James R., Chanock, Stephen J., Slager, Susan L., and Rothman, Nathaniel
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

18. Clinical and pathological associations of PTEN expression in ovarian cancer: a multicentre study from the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium.

Author: Martins, Filipe Correia, Couturier, Dominique-Laurent, Paterson, Anna, Karnezis, Anthony N, Chow, Christine, Nazeran, Tayyebeh M, Odunsi, Adekunle, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Vrvilo, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Talhouk, Aline, Osorio, Ana, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, DeFazio, Anna, Fischer, Anna, Hartmann, Arndt, Hernandez, Brenda Y, McCauley, Bryan M, Karpinskyj, Chloe, de Sousa, Christiani B, Høgdall, Claus, Tiezzi, Daniel G, Herpel, Esther, Taran, Florin Andrei, Modugno, Francesmary, Keeney, Gary, Nelson, Gregg, Steed, Helen, Song, Honglin, Luk, Hugh, Benitez, Javier, Alsop, Jennifer, Koziak, Jennifer M, Lester, Jenny, Rothstein, Joseph H, de Andrade, Jurandyr M, Lundvall, Lene, Paz-Ares, Luis, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Wilkens, Lynne R, Garcia, Maria J, Intermaggio, Maria P, Alcaraz, Marie-Lyne, Brett, Mary A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Anglesio, Michael, Carney, Michael E, Schneider, Michael, Traficante, Nadia, Pejovic, Nadja, Singh, Naveena, Le, Nhu, Sinn, Peter, Ghatage, Prafull, Erber, Ramona, Edwards, Robert, Vierkant, Robert, Ness, Roberta B, Leung, Samuel, Orsulic, Sandra, Brucker, Sara Y, Kaufmann, Scott H, Fereday, Sian, Gayther, Simon, Winham, Stacey J, Kommoss, Stefan, Pejovic, Tanja, Longacre, Teri A, McGuire, Valerie, Rhenius, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Whittemore, Alice S, Staebler, Annette, Karlan, Beth Y, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Bowtell, David D, Goode, Ellen L, Høgdall, Estrid, Candido Dos Reis, Francisco J, Gronwald, Jacek, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, Fasching, Peter A, Crawford, Robin, Deen, Suha, Menon, Usha, Huntsman, David G, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan J, Pharoah, Paul DP, and Brenton, James D
Subjects: Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract: BackgroundPTEN loss is a putative driver in histotypes of ovarian cancer (high-grade serous (HGSOC), endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous (LGSOC)). We aimed to characterise PTEN expression as a biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer in a large population-based study.MethodsTumours from 5400 patients from a multicentre observational, prospective cohort study of the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium were used to evaluate associations between immunohistochemical PTEN patterns and overall survival time, age, stage, grade, residual tumour, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) counts, expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) by means of Cox proportional hazard models and generalised Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.ResultsDownregulation of cytoplasmic PTEN expression was most frequent in ENOC (most frequently in younger patients; p value = 0.0001) and CCOC and was associated with longer overall survival in HGSOC (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p value = 0.022). PTEN expression was associated with ER, PR and AR expression (p values: 0.0008, 0.062 and 0.0002, respectively) in HGSOC and with lower CD8 counts in CCOC (p value
Published: 2020

19. Assessment of interactions between 205 breast cancer susceptibility loci and 13 established risk factors in relation to breast cancer risk, in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Author: Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Lindström, Sara, Behrens, Sabine, Wang, Xiaoliang, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Kraft, Peter, García-Closas, Montserrat, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Berrandou, Takiy, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brock, Ian W, Broeks, Annegien, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Butterbach, Katja, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Clarke, Christine L, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dai, James Y, Dite, Gillian S, Earp, H Shelton, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan E, Harkness, Elaine F, Harstad, Tricia, He, Wei, Heyworth, Jane, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Humphreys, Keith, Hunter, David J, Marrón, Pablo Isidro, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Krüger, Ute, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, Lo, Wing-Yee, and Makalic, Enes
Subjects: Genetics, Estrogen, Clinical Research, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Europe, Factor XIII, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, White People, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Europeans, Gene-environment interaction, breast cancer, epidemiology, risk factors, single nucleotide polymorphism, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: BackgroundPrevious gene-environment interaction studies of breast cancer risk have provided sparse evidence of interactions. Using the largest available dataset to date, we performed a comprehensive assessment of potential effect modification of 205 common susceptibility variants by 13 established breast cancer risk factors, including replication of previously reported interactions.MethodsAnalyses were performed using 28 176 cases and 32 209 controls genotyped with iCOGS array and 44 109 cases and 48 145 controls genotyped using OncoArray from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Gene-environment interactions were assessed using unconditional logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Bayesian false discovery probability was used to assess the noteworthiness of the meta-analysed array-specific interactions.ResultsNoteworthy evidence of interaction at ≤1% prior probability was observed for three single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-risk factor pairs. SNP rs4442975 was associated with a greater reduction of risk of ER-positive breast cancer [odds ratio (OR)int = 0.85 (0.78-0.93), Pint = 2.8 x 10-4] and overall breast cancer [ORint = 0.85 (0.78-0.92), Pint = 7.4 x 10-5) in current users of estrogen-progesterone therapy compared with non-users. This finding was supported by replication using OncoArray data of the previously reported interaction between rs13387042 (r2 = 0.93 with rs4442975) and current estrogen-progesterone therapy for overall disease (Pint = 0.004). The two other interactions suggested stronger associations between SNP rs6596100 and ER-negative breast cancer with increasing parity and younger age at first birth.ConclusionsOverall, our study does not suggest strong effect modification of common breast cancer susceptibility variants by established risk factors.
Published: 2020

20. Fine-mapping of 150 breast cancer risk regions identifies 191 likely target genes.

Author: Fachal, Laura, Aschard, Hugues, Beesley, Jonathan, Barnes, Daniel R, Allen, Jamie, Kar, Siddhartha, Pooley, Karen A, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Turman, Constance, Soucy, Penny, Lemaçon, Audrey, Lush, Michael, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Ghoussaini, Maya, Moradi Marjaneh, Mahdi, Jiang, Xia, Agata, Simona, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alonso, M Rosario, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arason, Adalgeir, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Auber, Bernd, Auer, Paul L, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Białkowska, Katarzyna, Blanco, Amie M, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Bosse, Kristin, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Brock, Ian W, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Camp, Nicola J, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Carroll, Jason S, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Christiansen, Hans, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, Collée, J Margriet, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Dite, Gillian S, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Droit, Arnaud, Dubois, Stéphane, Dumont, Martine, Duran, Mercedes, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Floris, Giuseppe, and Flyger, Henrik
Subjects: GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Bayes Theorem, Risk Factors, Chromosome Mapping, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Biomarkers, Tumor, Genetic Testing, Prevention, Genetics, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Developmental Biology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified breast cancer risk variants in over 150 genomic regions, but the mechanisms underlying risk remain largely unknown. These regions were explored by combining association analysis with in silico genomic feature annotations. We defined 205 independent risk-associated signals with the set of credible causal variants in each one. In parallel, we used a Bayesian approach (PAINTOR) that combines genetic association, linkage disequilibrium and enriched genomic features to determine variants with high posterior probabilities of being causal. Potentially causal variants were significantly over-represented in active gene regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites. We applied our INQUSIT pipeline for prioritizing genes as targets of those potentially causal variants, using gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci), chromatin interaction and functional annotations. Known cancer drivers, transcription factors and genes in the developmental, apoptosis, immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways were over-represented among the highest-confidence target genes.
Published: 2020

21. Correction: Distinct germline genetic susceptibility profiles identified for common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes

Author: Berndt, Sonja I., Vijai, Joseph, Benavente, Yolanda, Camp, Nicola J., Nieters, Alexandra, Wang, Zhaoming, Smedby, Karin E., Kleinstern, Geffen, Hjalgrim, Henrik, Besson, Caroline, Skibola, Christine F., Morton, Lindsay M., Brooks-Wilson, Angela R., Teras, Lauren R., Breeze, Charles, Arias, Joshua, Adami, Hans-Olov, Albanes, Demetrius, Anderson, Kenneth C., Ansell, Stephen M., Bassig, Bryan, Becker, Nikolaus, Bhatti, Parveen, Birmann, Brenda M., Boffetta, Paolo, Bracci, Paige M., Brennan, Paul, Brown, Elizabeth E., Burdett, Laurie, Cannon-Albright, Lisa A., Chang, Ellen T., Chiu, Brian C. H., Chung, Charles C., Clavel, Jacqueline, Cocco, Pierluigi, Colditz, Graham, Conde, Lucia, Conti, David V., Cox, David G., Curtin, Karen, Casabonne, Delphine, De Vivo, Immaculata, Diepstra, Arjan, Diver, W. Ryan, Dogan, Ahmet, Edlund, Christopher K., Foretova, Lenka, Fraumeni, Jr, Joseph F., Gabbas, Attilio, Ghesquières, Hervé, Giles, Graham G., Glaser, Sally, Glenn, Martha, Glimelius, Bengt, Gu, Jian, Habermann, Thomas M., Haiman, Christopher A., Haioun, Corinne, Hofmann, Jonathan N., Holford, Theodore R., Holly, Elizabeth A., Hutchinson, Amy, Izhar, Aalin, Jackson, Rebecca D., Jarrett, Ruth F., Kaaks, Rudolph, Kane, Eleanor, Kolonel, Laurence N., Kong, Yinfei, Kraft, Peter, Kricker, Anne, Lake, Annette, Lan, Qing, Lawrence, Charles, Li, Dalin, Liebow, Mark, Link, Brian K., Magnani, Corrado, Maynadie, Marc, McKay, James, Melbye, Mads, Miligi, Lucia, Milne, Roger L., Molina, Thierry J., Monnereau, Alain, Montalvan, Rebecca, North, Kari E., Novak, Anne J., Onel, Kenan, Purdue, Mark P., Rand, Kristin A., Riboli, Elio, Riby, Jacques, Roman, Eve, Salles, Gilles, Sborov, Douglas W., Severson, Richard K., Shanafelt, Tait D., Smith, Martyn T., Smith, Alexandra, Song, Kevin W., Song, Lei, Southey, Melissa C., Spinelli, John J., Staines, Anthony, Stephens, Deborah, Sutherland, Heather J., Tkachuk, Kaitlyn, Thompson, Carrie A., Tilly, Hervé, Tinker, Lesley F., Travis, Ruth C., Turner, Jenny, Vachon, Celine M., Vajdic, Claire M., Van Den Berg, Anke, Van Den Berg, David J., Vermeulen, Roel C. H., Vineis, Paolo, Wang, Sophia S., Weiderpass, Elisabete, Weiner, George J., Weinstein, Stephanie, Doo, Nicole Wong, Ye, Yuanqing, Yeager, Meredith, Yu, Kai, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, Zhang, Yawei, Zheng, Tongzhang, Ziv, Elad, Sampson, Joshua, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Offit, Kenneth, Cozen, Wendy, Wu, Xifeng, Cerhan, James R., Chanock, Stephen J., Slager, Susan L., and Rothman, Nathaniel
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

22. Genetic overlap between autoimmune diseases and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes

Author: Din, Lennox, Sheikh, Mohammad, Kosaraju, Nikitha, Smedby, Karin Ekstrom, Bernatsky, Sasha, Berndt, Sonja I, Skibola, Christine F, Nieters, Alexandra, Wang, Sophia, McKay, James D, Cocco, Pierluigi, Maynadié, Marc, Foretová, Lenka, Staines, Anthony, Mack, Thomas M, de Sanjosé, Silvia, Vyse, Timothy J, Padyukov, Leonid, Monnereau, Alain, Arslan, Alan A, Moore, Amy, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela R, Novak, Anne J, Glimelius, Bengt, Birmann, Brenda M, Link, Brian K, Stewart, Carolyn, Vajdic, Claire M, Haioun, Corinne, Magnani, Corrado, Conti, David V, Cox, David G, Casabonne, Delphine, Albanes, Demetrius, Kane, Eleanor, Roman, Eve, Muzi, Giacomo, Salles, Gilles, Giles, Graham G, Adami, Hans‐Olov, Ghesquières, Hervé, De Vivo, Immaculata, Clavel, Jacqueline, Cerhan, James R, Spinelli, John J, Hofmann, Jonathan, Vijai, Joseph, Curtin, Karen, Costenbader, Karen H, Onel, Kenan, Offit, Kenneth, Teras, Lauren R, Morton, Lindsay, Conde, Lucia, Miligi, Lucia, Melbye, Mads, Ennas, Maria Grazia, Liebow, Mark, Purdue, Mark P, Glenn, Martha, Southey, Melissa C, Din, Morris, Rothman, Nathaniel, Camp, Nicola J, Doo, Nicole Wong, Becker, Nikolaus, Pradhan, Nisha, Bracci, Paige M, Boffetta, Paolo, Vineis, Paolo, Brennan, Paul, Kraft, Peter, Lan, Qing, Severson, Richard K, Vermeulen, Roel CH, Milne, Roger L, Kaaks, Rudolph, Travis, Ruth C, Weinstein, Stephanie J, Chanock, Stephen J, Ansell, Stephen M, Slager, Susan L, Zheng, Tongzhang, Zhang, Yawei, Benavente, Yolanda, Taub, Zachary, Madireddy, Lohith, Gourraud, Pierre‐Antoine, Oksenberg, Jorge R, Cozen, Wendy, Hjalgrim, Henrik, and Khankhanian, Pouya
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Lymphoma, Arthritis, Neurodegenerative, Brain Disorders, Autoimmune Disease, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Hematology, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Inflammatory and immune system, Alleles, Autoimmune Diseases, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, HLA Antigens, Humans, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Male, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, autoimmune disease, genome-wide association study, meta-analysis, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: Epidemiologic studies show an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in patients with autoimmune disease (AD), due to a combination of shared environmental factors and/or genetic factors, or a causative cascade: chronic inflammation/antigen-stimulation in one disease leads to another. Here we assess shared genetic risk in genome-wide-association-studies (GWAS). Secondary analysis of GWAS of NHL subtypes (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma) and ADs (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis). Shared genetic risk was assessed by (a) description of regional genetic of overlap, (b) polygenic risk score (PRS), (c)"diseasome", (d)meta-analysis. Descriptive analysis revealed few shared genetic factors between each AD and each NHL subtype. The PRS of ADs were not increased in NHL patients (nor vice versa). In the diseasome, NHLs shared more genetic etiology with ADs than solid cancers (p = .0041). A meta-analysis (combing AD with NHL) implicated genes of apoptosis and telomere length. This GWAS-based analysis four NHL subtypes and three ADs revealed few weakly-associated shared loci, explaining little total risk. This suggests common genetic variation, as assessed by GWAS in these sample sizes, may not be the primary explanation for the link between these ADs and NHLs.
Published: 2019

23. A comprehensive gene–environment interaction analysis in Ovarian Cancer using genome‐wide significant common variants

Author: Kim, Sehee, Wang, Miao, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Jensen, Allan, Wiensch, Ashley, Liu, Gang, Lee, Alice W, Ness, Roberta B, Salvatore, Maxwell, Tworoger, Shelley S, Whittemore, Alice S, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Sieh, Weiva, Olson, Sara H, Berchuck, Andrew, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia, Rossing, Mary Anne, Webb, Penelope M, Giles, Graham G, Terry, Kathryn L, Ziogas, Argyrios, Fortner, Renée T, Menon, Usha, Gayther, Simon A, Wu, Anna H, Song, Honglin, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Bandera, Elisa V, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Milne, Roger L, Winham, Stacey J, Kjaer, Susanne K, Modugno, Francesmary, Thompson, Pamela J, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Harris, Holly R, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Le, Nhu D, Wentzensen, Nico, Trabert, Britton, Høgdall, Estrid, Huntsman, David, Pike, Malcolm C, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, and Mukherjee, Bhramar
Subjects: Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Genetics, Patient Safety, Cancer, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Case-Control Studies, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Environment, Environmental Exposure, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, ovarian cancer, genetics, additive interaction, G x E, G × E, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: As a follow-up to genome-wide association analysis of common variants associated with ovarian carcinoma (cancer), our study considers seven well-known ovarian cancer risk factors and their interactions with 28 genome-wide significant common genetic variants. The interaction analyses were based on data from 9971 ovarian cancer cases and 15,566 controls from 17 case-control studies. Likelihood ratio and Wald tests for multiplicative interaction and for relative excess risk due to additive interaction were used. The top multiplicative interaction was noted between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (ever vs. never) and rs13255292 (p value = 3.48 × 10-4 ). Among women with the TT genotype for this variant, the odds ratio for OCP use was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.46-0.60) compared to 0.71 (95%CI = 0.66-0.77) for women with the CC genotype. When stratified by duration of OCP use, women with 1-5 years of OCP use exhibited differential protective benefit across genotypes. However, no interaction on either the multiplicative or additive scale was found to be statistically significant after multiple testing correction. The results suggest that OCP use may offer increased benefit for women who are carriers of the T allele in rs13255292. On the other hand, for women carrying the C allele in this variant, longer (5+ years) use of OCP may reduce the impact of carrying the risk allele of this SNP. Replication of this finding is needed. The study presents a comprehensive analytic framework for conducting gene-environment analysis in ovarian cancer.
Published: 2019

24. Evaluation of vitamin D biosynthesis and pathway target genes reveals UGT2A1/2 and EGFR polymorphisms associated with epithelial ovarian cancer in African American Women

Author: Grant, Delores J, Manichaikul, Ani, Alberg, Anthony J, Bandera, Elisa V, Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill, Bondy, Melissa, Cote, Michele L, Funkhouser, Ellen, Moorman, Patricia G, Peres, Lauren C, Peters, Edward S, Schwartz, Ann G, Terry, Paul D, Wang, Xin‐Qun, Keku, Temitope O, Hoyo, Cathrine, Berchuck, Andrew, Sandler, Dale P, Taylor, Jack A, O’Brien, Katie M, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Edwards, Todd L, Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Whittemore, Alice S, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Rothstein, Joseph H, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta, Moysich, Kirsten, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Sellers, Thomas A, Permuth‐Way, Jennifer B, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Levine, Douglas A, Setiawan, Veronica Wendy, Haiman, Christopher A, LeMarchand, Loic, Wilkens, Lynne R, Karlan, Beth Y, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan, Gayther, Simon, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Goode, Ellen L, Larson, Melissa C, Kaufmann, Scott H, Cannioto, Rikki, Odunsi, Kunle, Etter, John L, Huang, Ruea‐Yea, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Tone, Alicia A, May, Taymaa, Goodman, Marc T, Thompson, Pamela J, Carney, Michael E, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Brenton, James D, Bjorge, Line, Salvensen, Helga B, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bruegl, Amanda, Moffitt, Melissa, Cook, Linda, Le, Nhu D, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Pharoah, Paul DP, Song, Honglin, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, DeFazio, Anna, Kennedy, Catherine J, and Schildkraut, Joellen M
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Biotechnology, Nutrition, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Black or African American, Bayes Theorem, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, ErbB Receptors, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Glucuronosyltransferase, Humans, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Calcitriol, Vitamin D, African ancestry risk, genetic association, ovarian cancer, vitamin D pathway, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: An association between genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was previously reported in women of African ancestry (AA). We sought to examine associations between genetic variants in VDR and additional genes from vitamin D biosynthesis and pathway targets (EGFR, UGT1A, UGT2A1/2, UGT2B, CYP3A4/5, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, CYP11A1, and GC). Genotyping was performed using the custom-designed 533,631 SNP Illumina OncoArray with imputation to the 1,000 Genomes Phase 3 v5 reference set in 755 EOC cases, including 537 high-grade serous (HGSOC), and 1,235 controls. All subjects are of African ancestry (AA). Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We further evaluated statistical significance of selected SNPs using the Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP). A significant association with EOC was identified in the UGT2A1/2 region for the SNP rs10017134 (per allele OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7, P = 1.2 × 10-6 , BFDP = 0.02); and an association with HGSOC was identified in the EGFR region for the SNP rs114972508 (per allele OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.6-3.4, P = 1.6 × 10-5 , BFDP = 0.29) and in the UGT2A1/2 region again for rs1017134 (per allele OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7, P = 2.3 × 10-5 , BFDP = 0.23). Genetic variants in the EGFR and UGT2A1/2 may increase susceptibility of EOC in AA women. Future studies to validate these findings are warranted. Alterations in EGFR and UGT2A1/2 could perturb enzyme efficacy, proliferation in ovaries, impact and mark susceptibility to EOC.
Published: 2019

25. Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Author: Mavaddat, Nasim, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Fachal, Laura, Lee, Andrew, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Chen, Ting-Huei, Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K, Yang, Xin, Adank, Muriel A, Ahearn, Thomas, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Allen, Jamie, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Auvinen, Päivi, Barrdahl, Myrto, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Bremer, Michael, Brenner, Hermann, Brentnall, Adam, Brock, Ian W, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chlebowski, Rowan, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Försti, Asta, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Georgoulias, Vassilios, Giles, Graham G, Gilyazova, Irina R, Glendon, Gord, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grenaker Alnæs, Grethe I, Grip, Mervi, Gronwald, Jacek, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, and Hankinson, Susan E
Subjects: ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptors, Estrogen, Medical History Taking, Risk Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Age Factors, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, breast, cancer, epidemiology, genetic, polygenic, prediction, risk, score, screening, stratification, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
Published: 2019

26. Genome-wide interaction analysis of menopausal hormone therapy use and breast cancer risk among 62,370 women

Author: Xiaoliang Wang, Pooja Middha Kapoor, Paul L. Auer, Joe Dennis, Alison M. Dunning, Qin Wang, Michael Lush, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K. Bolla, Kristan J. Aronson, Rachel A. Murphy, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Derrick G. Lee, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Claire Mulot, Lauren R. Teras, Alpa V. Patel, Laure Dossus, Rudolf Kaaks, Reiner Hoppe, Wing-Yee Lo, Thomas Brüning, Ute Hamann, Kamila Czene, Marike Gabrielson, Per Hall, Mikael Eriksson, Audrey Jung, Heiko Becher, Fergus J. Couch, Nicole L. Larson, Janet E. Olson, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Graham G. Giles, Robert J. MacInnis, Melissa C. Southey, Loic Le Marchand, Lynne R. Wilkens, Christopher A. Haiman, Håkan Olsson, Annelie Augustinsson, Ute Krüger, Philippe Wagner, Christopher Scott, Stacey J. Winham, Celine M. Vachon, Charles M. Perou, Andrew F. Olshan, Melissa A. Troester, David J. Hunter, Heather A. Eliassen, Rulla M. Tamimi, Kristen Brantley, Irene L. Andrulis, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Thomas U. Ahearn, Montserrat García-Closas, Gareth D. Evans, William G. Newman, Elke M. van Veen, Anthony Howell, Alicja Wolk, Niclas Håkansson, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Michael E. Jones, Nick Orr, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Cari M. Kitahara, Martha Linet, Ross L. Prentice, Douglas F. Easton, Roger L. Milne, Peter Kraft, Jenny Chang-Claude, and Sara Lindström
Subjects: Medicine, Science
Abstract: Abstract Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

27. Statistics to prioritize rare variants in family‐based sequencing studies with disease subtypes.

Author: Nieuwoudt, Christina, Farooq, Fabiha Binte, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Bureau, Alexandre, and Graham, Jinko
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

28. Interactions between exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and xenobiotic metabolism genes, and risk of breast cancer

Author: Lee, Derrick G., Schuetz, Johanna M., Lai, Agnes S., Burstyn, Igor, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Aronson, Kristan J., and Spinelli, John J.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

29. Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes

Author: Thomas U. Ahearn, Haoyu Zhang, Kyriaki Michailidou, Roger L. Milne, Manjeet K. Bolla, Joe Dennis, Alison M. Dunning, Michael Lush, Qin Wang, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Paul L. Auer, Annelie Augustinsson, Adinda Baten, Heiko Becher, Sabine Behrens, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Carl Blomqvist, Stig E. Bojesen, Bernardo Bonanni, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Thomas Brüning, Barbara Burwinkel, Saundra S. Buys, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Christine L. Clarke, NBCS Collaborators, J. Margriet Collée, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Giuseppe Floris, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Susan M. Gapstur, José A. García-Sáenz, Mia M. Gaudet, Graham G. Giles, Mark S. Goldberg, Anna González-Neira, Grethe I. Grenaker Alnæs, Mervi Grip, Pascal Guénel, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Elaine F. Harkness, Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernd Holleczek, Antoinette Hollestelle, Maartje J. Hooning, Robert N. Hoover, John L. Hopper, Anthony Howell, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Milena Jakimovska, Anna Jakubowska, Esther M. John, Michael E. Jones, Audrey Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Saila Kauppila, Renske Keeman, Elza Khusnutdinova, Cari M. Kitahara, Yon-Dschun Ko, Stella Koutros, Vessela N. Kristensen, Ute Krüger, Katerina Kubelka-Sabit, Allison W. Kurian, Kyriacos Kyriacou, Diether Lambrechts, Derrick G. Lee, Annika Lindblom, Martha Linet, Jolanta Lissowska, Ana Llaneza, Wing-Yee Lo, Robert J. MacInnis, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, Maria Elena Martinez, Catriona McLean, Alfons Meindl, Usha Menon, Heli Nevanlinna, William G. Newman, Jesse Nodora, Kenneth Offit, Håkan Olsson, Nick Orr, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Alpa V. Patel, Julian Peto, Guillermo Pita, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Ross Prentice, Kevin Punie, Katri Pylkäs, Paolo Radice, Gad Rennert, Atocha Romero, Thomas Rüdiger, Emmanouil Saloustros, Sarah Sampson, Dale P. Sandler, Elinor J. Sawyer, Rita K. Schmutzler, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Ben Schöttker, Mark E. Sherman, Xiao-Ou Shu, Snezhana Smichkoska, Melissa C. Southey, John J. Spinelli, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William J. Tapper, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, Mary Beth Terry, Diana Torres, Melissa A. Troester, Celine M. Vachon, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Elke M. van Veen, Philippe Wagner, Clarice R. Weinberg, Camilla Wendt, Jelle Wesseling, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Xiaohong R. Yang, Wei Zheng, Fergus J. Couch, Jacques Simard, Peter Kraft, Douglas F. Easton, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Montserrat García-Closas, and Nilanjan Chatterjee
Subjects: Breast cancer, Etiologic heterogeneity, Genetic predisposition, Common breast cancer susceptibility variants, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract: Abstract Background Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER) status, but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear. Methods Among 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes. Results Eighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

30. Gene and pathway based burden analyses in familial lymphoid cancer cases: Rare variants in immune pathway genes.

Author: Sneha Ralli, Samantha J Jones, Stephen Leach, Henry T Lynch, and Angela R Brooks-Wilson
Subjects: Medicine, Science
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have revealed common genetic variants with small effect sizes associated with diverse lymphoid cancers. Family studies have uncovered rare variants with high effect sizes. However, these variants explain only a portion of the heritability of these cancers. Some of the missing heritability may be attributable to rare variants with small effect sizes. We aim to identify rare germline variants associated with familial lymphoid cancers using exome sequencing. One case per family was selected from 39 lymphoid cancer families based on early onset of disease or rarity of subtype. Control data was from Non-Finnish Europeans in gnomAD exomes (N = 56,885) or ExAC (N = 33,370). Gene and pathway-based burden tests for rare variants were performed using TRAPD. Five putatively pathogenic germline variants were found in four genes: INTU, PEX7, EHHADH, and ASXL1. Pathway-based association tests identified the innate and adaptive immune systems, peroxisomal pathway and olfactory receptor pathway as associated with lymphoid cancers in familial cases. Our results suggest that rare inherited defects in the genes involved in immune system and peroxisomal pathway may predispose individuals to lymphoid cancers.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

31. rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology.

Author: Kelemen, Linda E, Earp, Madalene, Fridley, Brooke L, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Hein, Alexander, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Behrens, Sabine, Moysich, Kirsten B, Cannioto, Rikki, Lele, Shashikant, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Thompson, Pamela J, Wilkens, Lynne R, Dörk, Thilo, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Heitz, Florian, Schwaab, Ira, Butzow, Ralf, Pelttari, Liisa M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Walsh, Christine, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen, Wu, Xifeng, Sellers, Thomas A, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Vestrheim Thomsen, Liv Cecilie, Bjorge, Line, Krakstad, Camilla, Tangen, Ingvild L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, Massuger, Leon FAG, van Altena, Anne M, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Kellar, Melissa, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Gronwald, Jacek, Cybulski, Cezary, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Hogdall, Estrid, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, McNeish, Iain, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Carty, Karen
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Hydro-Lyases, Thymidylate Synthase, Proteins, RNA, Antisense, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Middle Aged, Female, Genetic Association Studies, consortia, enolase superfamily member 1, expression quantitative trait locus, genetics, gynecology, ovarian neoplasms, single-nucleotide polymorphism, thymidylate synthase, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Biotechnology, Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Genetics, Chemical Physics, Other Chemical Sciences, Other Biological Sciences
Abstract: Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
Published: 2018

32. Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies.

Author: Peres, Lauren C, Risch, Harvey, Terry, Kathryn L, Webb, Penelope M, Goodman, Marc T, Wu, Anna H, Alberg, Anthony J, Bandera, Elisa V, Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill, Bondy, Melissa L, Cote, Michele L, Funkhouser, Ellen, Moorman, Patricia G, Peters, Edward S, Schwartz, Ann G, Terry, Paul D, Manichaikul, Ani, Abbott, Sarah E, Camacho, Fabian, Jordan, Susan J, Nagle, Christina M, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Anne Rossing, Mary, Doherty, Jennifer A, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, Ness, Roberta, Berchuck, Andrew, Cook, Linda, Le, Nhu, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Pearce, Celeste L, Tseng, Chiuchen, Pike, Malcom, Schildkraut, Joellen M, and African American Cancer Epidemiology Study and the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, African American Cancer Epidemiology Study and the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Published: 2018

33. Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

Author: Ong, Jue-Sheng, Hwang, Liang-Dar, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Martin, Nicholas G, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Quinn, Michael CJ, Cornelis, Marilyn C, Gharahkhani, Puya, Webb, Penelope M, MacGregor, Stuart, Bryne, Enda, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Jones, Michael, Orr, Nicholas, Schoemaker, Minouk, Edwards, Digna Velez, Brenton, James, Benítez, Javier, García, María J, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Fortner, Renée T, Riboli, Elio, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Duerst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Olsson, Håkan, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Wu, Xifeng, Le Marchand, Loic, Setiawan, V Wendy, Permuth, Jennifer B, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Willet, Walter, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, and Lissowska, Jolanta
Subjects: Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Nutrition, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Coffee, Female, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Odds Ratio, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Public health
Abstract: BackgroundCoffee consumption has been shown to be associated with various health outcomes in observational studies. However, evidence for its association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is inconsistent and it is unclear whether these associations are causal.MethodsWe used single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with (i) coffee and (ii) caffeine consumption to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) on EOC risk. We conducted a two-sample MR using genetic data on 44 062 individuals of European ancestry from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), and combined instrumental variable estimates using a Wald-type ratio estimator.ResultsFor all EOC cases, the causal odds ratio (COR) for genetically predicted consumption of one additional cup of coffee per day was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.06]. The COR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous EOC. The COR for genetically predicted consumption of an additional 80 mg caffeine was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.11) for all EOC cases and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous cases.ConclusionsWe found no evidence indicative of a strong association between EOC risk and genetically predicted coffee or caffeine levels. However, our estimates were not statistically inconsistent with earlier observational studies and we were unable to rule out small protective associations.
Published: 2018

34. Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author: Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Nagle, Christina M, Thrift, Aaron P, Pharoah, Paul DP, Ewing, Ailith, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Zheng, Wei, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Wicklund, Kristine G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Jung, Audrey Y, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Dörk, Thilo, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Hillemanns, Peter, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Schwaab, Ira, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Rimel, Bobbie J, Kjær, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Milne, Roger L, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Wu, Xifeng, Lu, Karen H, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Salvesen, Helga B, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bruegl, Amanda, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Swenerton, Kenneth D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Lubiński, Jan, Huzarski, Tomasz, Gronwald, Jacek, Menkiszak, Janusz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Yang, Hannah, Lissowska, Jolanta, Høgdall, Claus K, Lundvall, Lene, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Whittemore, Alice S
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Height, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Geography, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundObservational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.MethodsWe pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsGreater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.ConclusionsWomen with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.
Published: 2018

35. Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author: Earp, Madalene, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Winham, Stacey J, Lin, Hui-Yi, Chornokur, Ganna, Dennis, Joe, Aben, Katja KH, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Høgdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Jung, Audrey Y, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Lim, Boon Kiong, Kjaer, Susanne K, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lele, Shashi, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Li, Zheng, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, Paul, James, Pejovic, Tanja, Pelttari, Liisa M, Permuth, Jenny B, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rosen, Barry, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H, and Runnebaum, Ingo B
Subjects: Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, A Kinase Anchor Proteins, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Risk Factors, General Science & Technology
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in American women. Normal ovarian physiology is intricately connected to small GTP binding proteins of the Ras superfamily (Ras, Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran) which govern processes such as signal transduction, cell proliferation, cell motility, and vesicle transport. We hypothesized that common germline variation in genes encoding small GTPases is associated with EOC risk. We investigated 322 variants in 88 small GTPase genes in germline DNA of 18,736 EOC patients and 26,138 controls of European ancestry using a custom genotype array and logistic regression fitting log-additive models. Functional annotation was used to identify biofeatures and expression quantitative trait loci that intersect with risk variants. One variant, ARHGEF10L (Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like) rs2256787, was associated with increased endometrioid EOC risk (OR = 1.33, p = 4.46 x 10-6). Other variants of interest included another in ARHGEF10L, rs10788679, which was associated with invasive serous EOC risk (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00026) and two variants in AKAP6 (A-kinase anchoring protein 6) which were associated with risk of invasive EOC (rs1955513, OR = 0.90, p = 0.00033; rs927062, OR = 0.94, p = 0.00059). Functional annotation revealed that the two ARHGEF10L variants were located in super-enhancer regions and that AKAP6 rs927062 was associated with expression of GTPase gene ARHGAP5 (Rho GTPase activating protein 5). Inherited variants in ARHGEF10L and AKAP6, with potential transcriptional regulatory function and association with EOC risk, warrant investigation in independent EOC study populations.
Published: 2018

36. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer

Author: Milne, Roger L, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Kar, Siddhartha, Lindström, Sara, Hui, Shirley, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Dennis, Joe, Jiang, Xia, Rostamianfar, Asha, Finucane, Hilary, Bolla, Manjeet K, McGuffog, Lesley, Wang, Qin, Aalfs, Cora M, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Agata, Simona, Ahmed, Shahana, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Allen, Jamie, Ambrosone, Christine B, Amos, Christopher I, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Aronson, Kristan J, Auber, Bernd, Auer, Paul L, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Azzollini, Jacopo, Bacot, François, Balmaña, Judith, Barile, Monica, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrdahl, Myrto, Barnes, Daniel, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Bignon, Yves-Jean, Blazer, Kathleen R, Blok, Marinus J, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bobolis, Kristie, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Bozsik, Aniko, Bradbury, Angela R, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Bressac-de Paillerets, Brigitte, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Byun, Jinyoung, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Caron, Olivier, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, J Esteban, Castera, Laurent, Caux-Moncoutier, Virginie, Chan, Salina B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Christiansen, Hans, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, Conner, Thomas, Conroy, Don M, and Cook, Jackie
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Aging, Estrogen, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, BRCA1 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Heterozygote, Humans, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, White People, ABCTB Investigators, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, NBSC Collaborators, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Agricultural biotechnology, Bioinformatics and computational biology
Abstract: Most common breast cancer susceptibility variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. We conducted a GWAS using 21,468 ER-negative cases and 100,594 controls combined with 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer), all of European origin. We identified independent associations at P < 5 × 10-8 with ten variants at nine new loci. At P < 0.05, we replicated associations with 10 of 11 variants previously reported in ER-negative disease or BRCA1 mutation carrier GWAS and observed consistent associations with ER-negative disease for 105 susceptibility variants identified by other studies. These 125 variants explain approximately 16% of the familial risk of this breast cancer subtype. There was high genetic correlation (0.72) between risk of ER-negative breast cancer and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings may lead to improved risk prediction and inform further fine-mapping and functional work to better understand the biological basis of ER-negative breast cancer.
Published: 2017

37. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci

Author: Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lindström, Sara, Dennis, Joe, Beesley, Jonathan, Hui, Shirley, Kar, Siddhartha, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Glubb, Dylan, Rostamianfar, Asha, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Tyrer, Jonathan, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Wang, Zhaoming, Allen, Jamie, Keeman, Renske, Eilber, Ursula, French, Juliet D, Qing Chen, Xiao, Fachal, Laura, McCue, Karen, McCart Reed, Amy E, Ghoussaini, Maya, Carroll, Jason S, Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary, Adams, Marcia, Adank, Muriel A, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu, Auer, Paul L, Bacot, François, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brock, Ian W, Broeks, Annegien, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butterbach, Katja, Cai, Qiuyin, Cai, Hui, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, David Cheng, Ting-Yuan, Seng Chia, Kee, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, Margriet, Conroy, Don M, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Elvira, Mingajeva, and Engel, Christoph
Subjects: Cancer, Asia, Asian People, Binding Sites, Breast Neoplasms, Computer Simulation, Europe, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Risk Assessment, Transcription Factors, White People, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, ConFab/AOCS Investigators, General Science & Technology
Abstract: Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P
Published: 2017

38. Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Author: Phelan, Catherine M, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kar, Siddhartha P, Lawrenson, Kate, Winham, Stacey J, Dennis, Joe, Pirie, Ailith, Riggan, Marjorie J, Chornokur, Ganna, Earp, Madalene A, Lyra, Paulo C, Lee, Janet M, Coetzee, Simon, Beesley, Jonathan, McGuffog, Lesley, Soucy, Penny, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Barrowdale, Daniel, Lecarpentier, Julie, Leslie, Goska, Aalfs, Cora M, Aben, Katja KH, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, AOCS study group, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Banerjee, Susana N, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Birrer, Michael J, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Blankstein, Kenneth, Blok, Marinus J, Bodelon, Clara, Bogdanova, Natalia, Bojesen, Anders, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Åke, Bradbury, Angela R, Brenton, James D, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Buecher, Bruno, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Carney, Michael E, Cescon, Terence, Chan, Salina B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Conner, Thomas, Cook, Linda S, Cook, Jackie, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, D'Aloisio, Aimee A, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Damirovna, Sakaeva Dina, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dao, Fanny, Davidson, Rosemarie, DeFazio, Anna, Delnatte, Capucine, Doheny, Kimberly F, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Domchek, Susan M, and Dorfling, Cecilia M
Subjects: AOCS study group, EMBRACE Study, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON Study, KConFab Investigators, OPAL study group, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Telomere-Binding Proteins, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Genotype, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Female, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract: To identify common alleles associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we pooled data from multiple genome-wide genotyping projects totaling 25,509 EOC cases and 40,941 controls. We identified nine new susceptibility loci for different EOC histotypes: six for serous EOC histotypes (3q28, 4q32.3, 8q21.11, 10q24.33, 18q11.2 and 22q12.1), two for mucinous EOC (3q22.3 and 9q31.1) and one for endometrioid EOC (5q12.3). We then performed meta-analysis on the results for high-grade serous ovarian cancer with the results from analysis of 31,448 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 3,887 mutation carriers with EOC. This identified three additional susceptibility loci at 2q13, 8q24.1 and 12q24.31. Integrated analyses of genes and regulatory biofeatures at each locus predicted candidate susceptibility genes, including OBFC1, a new candidate susceptibility gene for low-grade and borderline serous EOC.
Published: 2017

39. A Meta-analysis of Multiple Myeloma Risk Regions in African and European Ancestry Populations Identifies Putatively Functional Loci

Author: Rand, Kristin A, Song, Chi, Dean, Eric, Serie, Daniel J, Curtin, Karen, Sheng, Xin, Hu, Donglei, Huff, Carol Ann, Bernal-Mizrachi, Leon, Tomasson, Michael H, Ailawadhi, Sikander, Singhal, Seema, Pawlish, Karen, Peters, Edward S, Bock, Cathryn H, Stram, Alex, Van Den Berg, David J, Edlund, Christopher K, Conti, David V, Zimmerman, Todd, Hwang, Amie E, Huntsman, Scott, Graff, John, Nooka, Ajay, Kong, Yinfei, Pregja, Silvana L, Berndt, Sonja I, Blot, William J, Carpten, John, Casey, Graham, Chu, Lisa, Diver, W Ryan, Stevens, Victoria L, Lieber, Michael R, Goodman, Phyllis J, Hennis, Anselm JM, Hsing, Ann W, Mehta, Jayesh, Kittles, Rick A, Kolb, Suzanne, Klein, Eric A, Leske, Cristina, Murphy, Adam B, Nemesure, Barbara, Neslund-Dudas, Christine, Strom, Sara S, Vij, Ravi, Rybicki, Benjamin A, Stanford, Janet L, Signorello, Lisa B, Witte, John S, Ambrosone, Christine B, Bhatti, Parveen, John, Esther M, Bernstein, Leslie, Zheng, Wei, Olshan, Andrew F, Hu, Jennifer J, Ziegler, Regina G, Nyante, Sarah J, Bandera, Elisa V, Birmann, Brenda M, Ingles, Sue A, Press, Michael F, Atanackovic, Djordje, Glenn, Martha J, Cannon-Albright, Lisa A, Jones, Brandt, Tricot, Guido, Martin, Thomas G, Kumar, Shaji K, Wolf, Jeffrey L, Deming Halverson, Sandra L, Rothman, Nathaniel, Brooks-Wilson, Angela R, Rajkumar, S Vincent, Kolonel, Laurence N, Chanock, Stephen J, Slager, Susan L, Severson, Richard K, Janakiraman, Nalini, Terebelo, Howard R, Brown, Elizabeth E, De Roos, Anneclaire J, Mohrbacher, Ann F, Colditz, Graham A, Giles, Graham G, Spinelli, John J, Chiu, Brian C, Munshi, Nikhil C, Anderson, Kenneth C, Levy, Joan, Zonder, Jeffrey A, Orlowski, Robert Z, Lonial, Sagar, Camp, Nicola J, Vachon, Celine M, Ziv, Elad, Stram, Daniel O, and Hazelett, Dennis J
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Cancer, Clinical Research, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Hematology, Human Genome, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adult, Aged, Black People, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Polycomb Repressive Complex 1, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Repressor Proteins, Transmembrane Activator and CAML Interactor Protein, White People, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) in European populations have identified genetic risk variants associated with multiple myeloma.MethodsWe performed association testing of common variation in eight regions in 1,318 patients with multiple myeloma and 1,480 controls of European ancestry and 1,305 patients with multiple myeloma and 7,078 controls of African ancestry and conducted a meta-analysis to localize the signals, with epigenetic annotation used to predict functionality.ResultsWe found that variants in 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1 were statistically significantly (P < 0.05) associated with multiple myeloma risk in persons of African ancestry and persons of European ancestry, and the variant in 3p22.1 was associated in European ancestry only. In a combined African ancestry-European ancestry meta-analysis, variation in five regions (2p23.3, 3p22.1, 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1) was statistically significantly associated with multiple myeloma risk. In 3p22.1, the correlated variants clustered within the gene body of ULK4 Correlated variants in 7p15.3 clustered around an enhancer at the 3' end of the CDCA7L transcription termination site. A missense variant at 17p11.2 (rs34562254, Pro251Leu, OR, 1.32; P = 2.93 × 10-7) in TNFRSF13B encodes a lymphocyte-specific protein in the TNF receptor family that interacts with the NF-κB pathway. SNPs correlated with the index signal in 22q13.1 cluster around the promoter and enhancer regions of CBX7 CONCLUSIONS: We found that reported multiple myeloma susceptibility regions contain risk variants important across populations, supporting the use of multiple racial/ethnic groups with different underlying genetic architecture to enhance the localization and identification of putatively functional alleles.ImpactA subset of reported risk loci for multiple myeloma has consistent effects across populations and is likely to be functional. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(12); 1609-18. ©2016 AACR.
Published: 2016

40. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma.

Author: Saner, Flurina, Saner, Flurina, Takahashi, Kazuaki, Budden, Timothy, Pandey, Ahwan, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Zwimpfer, Tibor, Meagher, Nicola, Fereday, Sian, Twomey, Laura, Pishas, Kathleen, Hoang, Therese, Bolithon, Adelyn, Traficante, Nadia, Alsop, Kathryn, Christie, Elizabeth, Kang, Eun-Young, Nelson, Gregg, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie, Alsop, Jennifer, Beckmann, Matthias, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing-Haugen, Kara, Cybulski, Cezary, El-Bahrawy, Mona, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Gayther, Simon, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C, Harnett, Paul, Harris, Holly, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael, Kaufmann, Scott, Kennedy, Catherine, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer, Kristjansdottir, Björg, Le, Nhu, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Mateoiu, Constantina, Orsulic, Sandra, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark, Shvetsov, Yurii, Soong, T, Steed, Helen, Sukumvanich, Paniti, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah, Vierkant, Robert, Wang, Chen, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne, Winham, Stacey, Anglesio, Michael, Berchuck, Andrew, Brenton, James, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda, Doherty, Jennifer, Fasching, Peter, Fortner, Renée, Goodman, Marc, Gronwald, Jacek, Karlan, Beth, Kelemen, Linda, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul, Schildkraut, Joellen, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony, Goode, Ellen, DeFazio, Anna, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan, Bowtell, David, Garsed, Dale, Saner, Flurina, Saner, Flurina, Takahashi, Kazuaki, Budden, Timothy, Pandey, Ahwan, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Zwimpfer, Tibor, Meagher, Nicola, Fereday, Sian, Twomey, Laura, Pishas, Kathleen, Hoang, Therese, Bolithon, Adelyn, Traficante, Nadia, Alsop, Kathryn, Christie, Elizabeth, Kang, Eun-Young, Nelson, Gregg, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie, Alsop, Jennifer, Beckmann, Matthias, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing-Haugen, Kara, Cybulski, Cezary, El-Bahrawy, Mona, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Gayther, Simon, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C, Harnett, Paul, Harris, Holly, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael, Kaufmann, Scott, Kennedy, Catherine, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer, Kristjansdottir, Björg, Le, Nhu, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Mateoiu, Constantina, Orsulic, Sandra, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark, Shvetsov, Yurii, Soong, T, Steed, Helen, Sukumvanich, Paniti, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah, Vierkant, Robert, Wang, Chen, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne, Winham, Stacey, Anglesio, Michael, Berchuck, Andrew, Brenton, James, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda, Doherty, Jennifer, Fasching, Peter, Fortner, Renée, Goodman, Marc, Gronwald, Jacek, Karlan, Beth, Kelemen, Linda, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul, Schildkraut, Joellen, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony, Goode, Ellen, DeFazio, Anna, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan, Bowtell, David, and Garsed, Dale
Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. RESULTS: RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. CONCLUSIONS: Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Published: 2024

41. Youth justice geographies and convicted young people's mobilities

Author: Brooks-Wilson, Sarah Jane
Subjects: 364.36
Abstract: Currently, there is a gap in knowledge about the context of convicted young people’s youth justice journey making and its treatment. Youth justice orders can break down as a result of absence, with sentence escalation and even custody becoming possible, if problems remain unresolved. Youth justice attendance can be as low as fifty per cent, with over twenty per cent of orders breaking down in some locations. Yet a lack of statistical detail makes it impossible to establish the extent of the problem. Low income households are over-represented in the youth justice population, and such groups can have limited access to transport while experiencing difficulties accessing essential local services. Subsequently, convicted young people’s youth justice journey making and treatment needs to be better understood in order to ensure responses remain proportionate, as per existing agreements. This thesis borrows ideas from the new mobilities paradigm, transposing them into a youth justice context, while remembering well cemented connections with social policy. Two mixed methods case studies will examine convicted young people’s youth justice journey making and treatment in locations where neighbourhood deprivation and youth justice order breakdown rates were at some of the highest in the country. Accessible visual research tools facilitated communication with young people and practitioners about youth justice journey making and absence management, to develop more fluid understandings of convicted young people’s youth justice journey making, and its treatment. The malleability and interconnectedness of journey making, attendance management and service delivery allows this research to make recommendations for national policy, local youth justice systems and individual practice. Importantly, the (re)production of convicted young people’s social inequalities as an unintended consequence of youth justice treatment, suggests the need for mobilities to have an elevated status in the delivery of social policies through youth justice services.
Published: 2016

42. The Youth Justice Commute (or the Institutional Construction of Youth Transport Poverty).

Author: Brooks-Wilson, Sarah
Subjects: YOUNG adults, SOCIAL marginality, JUSTICE, COMMUNICATION education, POVERTY
Abstract: Youth justice commuting problems need better recognition due to the complex dispersal of practice sites and prevalence of characteristics associated with journey barriers. Applying a transport poverty framework to the youth justice population develops adult-focused research and establishes youth transport poverty for the first time. Data from 28 young people and 33 practitioners in two high-deprivation, post-industrial English towns suggests that free transport offers a partial solution. Recommendations indicate that inclusive communication and established education sector policies could support youth justice accessibility, help understand connections between over-representation and commuting problems, and support other contexts like education to employment transitions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

43. APOE ε4 carrier status modifies plasma p‐tau181 concentrations in cognitively healthy super‐seniors.

Author: Cooper, Jennifer G., Ghodsi, Mohammad, Stukas, Sophie, Leach, Stephen, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, and Wellington, Cheryl L.
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the effect of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype on neurology plasma biomarkers in cognitively healthy Super‐Seniors. METHODS: Three hundred seventy plasma specimens from Super‐Senior participants ≥ 85 years old, who have never been diagnosed with dementia, cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular, or major pulmonary disease, were analyzed on the Quanterix Simoa HD‐X analyzer using commercial Neurology 4‐plex E and phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181 assays. RESULTS: Eighty (22%) participants were APOE ε4 carriers and 290 (73%) were non‐carriers. No significant differences were found between APOE ε4 carriers and non‐carriers regarding age, sex, or Mini‐Mental State Examination scores. In APOE ε4 carriers, plasma amyloid beta 42/40 was lower and p‐tau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein were higher compared to non‐APOE ε4 carriers. After adjusting for demographic variables, p‐tau181 was the only biomarker to remain significantly associated with APOE ε4 carrier status. DISCUSSION: APOE ε4 genotype modifies plasma p‐tau181 concentration in seniors resilient to age‐related clinical disease, suggesting that some Super‐Seniors may have Alzheimer's disease pathology without progressing to cognitive decline. Highlights: Healthy seniors enable identification of associations that may be masked by disease.Plasma phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181 concentrations associate with apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carriership in healthy seniors.APOE should be accounted for when interpreting p‐tau181, regardless of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

44. Functional MRI evaluation of cognitive effects of carotid stenosis revascularization

Author: Betty Chinda, Kim H Tran, Sam Doesburg, William Siu, George Medvedev, S Simon Liang, Angela Brooks‐Wilson, and Xiaowei Song
Subjects: brain function, carotid stenosis, cognitive function, functional MRI, revascularization, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, RC321-571
Abstract: Abstract Introduction Severe internal carotid stenosis, if left untreated, can pose serious risks for ischemic stroke and cognitive impairments. The effects of revascularization on any aspects of cognition, however, are not well understood, as conflicting results are reported, which have mainly been centered on paper‐based cognitive analyses. Here, we summarized and evaluated the publications to date of functional MRI (fMRI) studies that examined the mechanisms of functional brain activation and connectivity as a way to reflect cognitive effects of revascularization on patients with carotid stenosis. Methods A PubMed and Google Scholar (covering the relevant literature until November 1, 2021) search yielded eight original studies of the research line, including seven resting‐state and one task‐based fMRI reports. Results Findings demonstrated treatment‐related alterations in fMRI signal intensity and symmetry level, regional fMRI activation pattern, and functional brain network connectivity. The functional brain changes were associated largely with improvement in cognitive function assessed using standard cognitive test scores. Conclusions These findings support the contribution of fMRI to the understanding of brain functional activation and connectivity changes revealing cognitive effects of revascularization in the management of severe carotid stenosis. The review also highlighted the importance of reproducibility through enhancing experimental designs and cognitive task applications with future research for potential clinical translation.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

45. Statistics to prioritize rare variants in family-based sequencing studies with disease subtypes

Author: Nieuwoudt, Christina, primary, Binte Farooq, Fabiha, additional, Graham, Jinko, additional, Brooks-WIlson, Angela, additional, Bureau, Alexandre, additional, and Brooks-Wilson, Angela, additional
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

46. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility: results from a large-scale collaboration

Author: Permuth, Jennifer B, Reid, Brett, Earp, Madalene, Chen, Y Ann, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Chen, Zhihua, Group, AOCS Study, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Van Niewenhuyse, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Kelley, Joseph, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham, Hildebrandt, Michelle, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Fridley, Brooke, Cunningham, Julie, Winham, Stacey J, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Le, Nhu, Cook, Linda S, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Pharoah, Paul DP, Song, Honglin, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, McNeish, Iain, Whittemore, Alice, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Rothstein, Joseph, Phelan, Catherine M, Risch, Harvey, Narod, Steven, McLaughlin, John, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Menon, Usha, Gayther, Simon, Ramus, Susan J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cheng, Jin Q, and Goode, Ellen L
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, RNA Editing, polymorphisms, RNA editing, ovarian cancer risk, AOCS Study Group, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: RNA editing in mammals is a form of post-transcriptional modification in which adenosine is converted to inosine by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on evidence of altered ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ADAR genes modify EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering ovarian tissue gene expression. Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 controls, we evaluated the associations of 5,303 SNPs in ADAD1, ADAR, ADAR2, ADAR3, and SND1. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for European ancestry. We conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Association analysis revealed top risk-associated SNP rs77027562 (OR (95% CI)= 1.39 (1.17-1.64), P=1.0x10-4) in ADAR3 and rs185455523 in SND1 (OR (95% CI)= 0.68 (0.56-0.83), P=2.0x10-4). When restricting to serous histology (n=6,500), the magnitude of association strengthened for rs185455523 (OR=0.60, P=1.0x10-4). Gene-level analyses revealed that variation in ADAR was associated (P
Published: 2016

47. Assessment of variation in immunosuppressive pathway genes reveals TGFBR2 to be associated with risk of clear cell ovarian cancer

Author: Hampras, Shalaka S, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Cannioto, Rikki, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Modugno, Francesmary, Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Preus, Leah, Knutson, Keith L, Wallace, Paul K, Hong, Chi-Chen, Friel, Grace, Davis, Warren, Nesline, Mary, Pearce, Celeste L, Kelemen, Linda E, Goodman, Marc T, Bandera, Elisa V, Terry, Kathryn L, Schoof, Nils, Eng, Kevin H, Clay, Alyssa, Singh, Prashant K, Joseph, Janine M, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Baker, Helen, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Doug, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hogdall, Claus, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Kolomeyevskaya, Nonna, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kruszka, Bridget, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashikant, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Liu, Song, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, and McGuire, Valeria
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type II, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Risk Factors, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, ovarian cancer, immunosuppression, biomarkers, genetic variation, TGFBR2, TGFBR2, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundRegulatory T (Treg) cells, a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes, are mediators of immunosuppression in cancer, and, thus, variants in genes encoding Treg cell immune molecules could be associated with ovarian cancer.MethodsIn a population of 15,596 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases and 23,236 controls, we measured genetic associations of 1,351 SNPs in Treg cell pathway genes with odds of ovarian cancer and tested pathway and gene-level associations, overall and by histotype, for the 25 genes, using the admixture likelihood (AML) method. The most significant single SNP associations were tested for correlation with expression levels in 44 ovarian cancer patients.ResultsThe most significant global associations for all genes in the pathway were seen in endometrioid ( p = 0.082) and clear cell ( p = 0.083), with the most significant gene level association seen with TGFBR2 ( p = 0.001) and clear cell EOC. Gene associations with histotypes at p < 0.05 included: IL12 ( p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, serous and high-grade serous, respectively), IL8RA ( p = 0.035, endometrioid and mucinous), LGALS1 ( p = 0.03, mucinous), STAT5B ( p = 0.022, clear cell), TGFBR1 ( p = 0.021 endometrioid) and TGFBR2 ( p = 0.017 and p = 0.025, endometrioid and mucinous, respectively).ConclusionsCommon inherited gene variation in Treg cell pathways shows some evidence of germline genetic contribution to odds of EOC that varies by histologic subtype and may be associated with mRNA expression of immune-complex receptor in EOC patients.
Published: 2016

48. Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Author: Ong, Jue-Sheng, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Anne Doherty, Jennifer, Anne Rossing, Mary, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle At, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja Kh, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon Fag, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, and Poole, Elizabeth M
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Vitamin D, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Nutrition, Clinical Research, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: BackgroundIn vitro and observational epidemiological studies suggest that vitamin D may play a role in cancer prevention. However, the relationship between vitamin D and ovarian cancer is uncertain, with observational studies generating conflicting findings. A potential limitation of observational studies is inadequate control of confounding. To overcome this problem, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and risk of ovarian cancer.MethodsWe employed SNPs with well-established associations with 25(OH)D concentration as instrumental variables for MR: rs7944926 (DHCR7), rs12794714 (CYP2R1) and rs2282679 (GC). We included 31 719 women of European ancestry (10 065 cases, 21 654 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, who were genotyped using customized Illumina Infinium iSelect (iCOGS) arrays. A two-sample (summary data) MR approach was used and analyses were performed separately for all ovarian cancer (10 065 cases) and for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (4121 cases).ResultsThe odds ratio for epithelial ovarian cancer risk (10 065 cases) estimated by combining the individual SNP associations using inverse variance weighting was 1.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.51) per 20 nmol/L decrease in 25(OH)D concentration. The estimated odds ratio for high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (4121 cases) was 1.54 (1.19, 2.01).ConclusionsGenetically lowered 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were associated with higher ovarian cancer susceptibility in Europeans. These findings suggest that increasing plasma vitamin D levels may reduce risk of ovarian cancer.
Published: 2016

49. Exome genotyping arrays to identify rare and low frequency variants associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Permuth, Jennifer B, Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Y Ann, Lin, Hui-Yi, Reid, Brett M, Chen, Zhihua, Monteiro, Alvaro, Dennis, Joe, Mendoza-Fandino, Gustavo, Group, AOCS Study, Study, Australian Cancer, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, D’Aloisio, Aimee A, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Earp, Madalene, Edwards, Robert P, Fridley, Brooke L, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Hogdall, Estrid, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kjaer, Suzanne K, Kraft, Peter, Le, Nhu D, Levine, Douglas A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubinski, Jan, Matsuo, Keitaro, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Rosemary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Nakanishi, Toru, Ness, Roberta B, Olson, Sara, Orlow, Irene, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Poole, Elizabeth M, Ramus, Susan J, Rossing, Mary Anne, Sandler, Dale P, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Song, Honglin, Taylor, Jack A, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Tworoger, Shelley S, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey, Woo, Yin-Ling, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Phelan, Catherine M, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Goode, Ellen L, Pharoah, Paul DP, Sellers, Thomas A, and Consortium, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Prevention, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Actins, Biotinidase, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Exome, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Keratin-13, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 2, AOCS Study Group, Australian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Rare and low frequency variants are not well covered in most germline genotyping arrays and are understudied in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. To address this gap, we used genotyping arrays targeting rarer protein-coding variation in 8,165 EOC cases and 11,619 controls from the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Pooled association analyses were conducted at the variant and gene level for 98,543 variants directly genotyped through two exome genotyping projects. Only common variants that represent or are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with previously-identified signals at established loci reached traditional thresholds for exome-wide significance (P P≥5.0 ×10 - 7) were detected for rare and low-frequency variants at 16 novel loci. Four rare missense variants were identified (ACTBL2 rs73757391 (5q11.2), BTD rs200337373 (3p25.1), KRT13 rs150321809 (17q21.2) and MC2R rs104894658 (18p11.21)), but only MC2R rs104894668 had a large effect size (OR = 9.66). Genes most strongly associated with EOC risk included ACTBL2 (PAML = 3.23 × 10 - 5; PSKAT-o = 9.23 × 10 - 4) and KRT13 (PAML = 1.67 × 10 - 4; PSKAT-o = 1.07 × 10 - 5), reaffirming variant-level analysis. In summary, this large study identified several rare and low-frequency variants and genes that may contribute to EOC susceptibility, albeit with possible small effects. Future studies that integrate epidemiology, sequencing, and functional assays are needed to further unravel the unexplained heritability and biology of this disease.
Published: 2016

50. Assessing the genetic architecture of epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes

Author: Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Dixon, Suzanne C, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja KH, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Blake Gilks, C, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, and Morgan, Terry K
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Obesity, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genotype, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pathology, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Heredity, Reproductive medicine
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest common cancers. The five most common types of disease are high-grade and low-grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell carcinoma. Each of these subtypes present distinct molecular pathogeneses and sensitivities to treatments. Recent studies show that certain genetic variants confer susceptibility to all subtypes while other variants are subtype-specific. Here, we perform an extensive analysis of the genetic architecture of EOC subtypes. To this end, we used data of 10,014 invasive EOC patients and 21,233 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium genotyped in the iCOGS array (211,155 SNPs). We estimate the array heritability (attributable to variants tagged on arrays) of each subtype and their genetic correlations. We also look for genetic overlaps with factors such as obesity, smoking behaviors, diabetes, age at menarche and height. We estimated the array heritabilities of high-grade serous disease ([Formula: see text] = 8.8 ± 1.1 %), endometrioid ([Formula: see text] = 3.2 ± 1.6 %), clear cell ([Formula: see text] = 6.7 ± 3.3 %) and all EOC ([Formula: see text] = 5.6 ± 0.6 %). Known associated loci contributed approximately 40 % of the total array heritability for each subtype. The contribution of each chromosome to the total heritability was not proportional to chromosome size. Through bivariate and cross-trait LD score regression, we found evidence of shared genetic backgrounds between the three high-grade subtypes: serous, endometrioid and undifferentiated. Finally, we found significant genetic correlations of all EOC with diabetes and obesity using a polygenic prediction approach.
Published: 2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Region

Database

Publisher

1,577 results on '"Brooks-Wilson, A."'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources