Search

Objectives: Evaluate the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on primary and follow-up staging in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI to avoid adverse effects and save time and costs during examination. Methods: A total of 105 [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for data evaluation. Two different reading protocols were analyzed by two experienced readers in consensus, including for PET/MRI-1 reading protocol unenhanced T2w and/or T1w imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging and for PET/MRI-2 reading protocol an additional T1w post contrast imaging. Patient-based and region-based evaluation according to the revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) Staging System (IPNHLSS) was performed, and a modified standard of reference was applied comprising histopathology and previous and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. Results: In patient-based analysis, PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 both determined a correct IPNHLSS tumor stage in 90/105 (86%) exams. Region-based analysis correctly identified 119/127 (94%) lymphoma-affected regions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 were 94%, 97%, 90%, 99%, 97%, respectively. There were no significant differences between PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2. Conclusions: The use of MRI contrast agents in [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI examinations has no beneficial effect in primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients. Therefore, switching to a contrast agent–free [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered in all pediatric lymphoma patients. Clinical relevance statement: This study gives a scientific baseline switching to a contrast agent–free [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI staging in pediatric lymphoma patients. This could avoid side effects of contrast agents and saves time and costs by a faster staging protocol for pediatric patients. Key Points: • No additional diagnostic benefit of MRI contrast agents at [¹⁸ F]FDG PET/MRI examinations of pediatric lymphoma primary and follow-up staging • Highly accurate primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients at MRI contrast–free [¹⁸ F]FDG PET/MRI in press

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether multiparametric¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI-based radiomics analysis is able to predict pathological complete response in breast cancer patients and hence potentially enhance pretherapeutic patient stratification. Methods: A total of 73 female patients (mean age 49 years; range 27–77 years) with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer underwent simultaneous¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and were included in this retrospective study. All PET/MRI datasets were imported to dedicated software (ITK-SNAP v. 3.6.0) for lesion annotation using a semi-automated method. Pretreatment biopsy specimens were used to determine tumor histology, tumor and nuclear grades, and immunohistochemical status. Histopathological results from surgical tumor specimens were used as the reference standard to distinguish between complete pathological response (pCR) and noncomplete pathological response. An elastic net was employed to select the most important radiomic features prior to model development. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for each model. Results: The best results in terms of AUCs and NPV for predicting complete pathological response in the entire cohort were obtained by the combination of all MR sequences and PET (0.8 and 79.5%, respectively), and no significant differences from the other models were observed. In further subgroup analyses, combining all MR and PET data, the best AUC (0.94) for predicting complete pathologic response was obtained in the HR+/HER2− group. No difference between results with/without the inclusion of PET characteristics was observed in the TN/HER2+ group, each leading to an AUC of 0.92 for all MR and all MR + PET datasets. Conclusion:¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI enables comprehensive high-quality radiomics analysis for the prediction of pCR in breast cancer patients, especially in those with HR+/HER2− receptor status. CA extern

Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the clinical utility of simultaneously obtained quantitative 18F-FDG PET and diffusion-weighted MRI datasets for predicting the histopathologic response of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) to neoadjuvant isolated limb perfusion (ILP). Methods: In total, 37 patients with a confirmed STS of the extremities underwent 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and after ILP with melphalan and tumor necrosis factor-α. For each patient, the maximum tumor size, metabolic activity (SUV), and diffusion restriction (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) were determined in pre- and posttherapeutic examinations, and percentage changes during treatment were calculated. Mann-Whitney U testing and receiver-operating-characteristic analysis were used to compare the results of the different quantitative parameters to predict the histopathologic response to therapy. Results from histopathologic analysis after tumor resection served as the reference standard, and patients were defined as responders or nonresponders based on the grading scale by Salzer-Kuntschik. Results: Histopathologic analysis categorized 22 (59%) patients as responders (grades I-III) and 15 (41%) as nonresponders (grades IV-VI). Under treatment, tumors in responders showed a mean reduction in size (-9.7%) and metabolic activity (SUVpeak, -51.9%; SUVmean, -43.8%), as well as an increase of the ADC values (ADCmin, +29.4%; ADCmean, +32.8%). The percentage changes in nonresponders were -6.2% in tumor size, -17.3% in SUVpeak, -13.9% in SUVmean, +15.3% in ADCmin, and +14.6% in ADCmean Changes in SUV and ADCmean significantly differed between responders and nonresponders (0.05). The corresponding AUCs were 0.63 for tumor size, 0.87 for SUVpeak, 0.82 for SUVmean, 0.63 for ADCmin, 0.84 for ADCmean, and 0.89 for ratio of ADCmean to SUVpeakConclusion: PET- and MRI-derived quantitative parameters (SUV and ADCmean) and their combination performed well in predicting the histopathologic therapy response of STS to neoadjuvant ILP. Therefore, integrated PET/MRI could serve as a valuable tool for pretherapeutic assessment as well as monitoring of neoadjuvant treatment strategies of STS.

Objectives To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal computed tomography and whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathological proven breast cancer. Material and methods A total of 80 consecutive women with newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. Following inclusion criteria had to be fulfilled: (1) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive T2-tumor or higher T-stage or (2) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive triple-negative tumor of every size or (3) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive tumor with molecular high risk (T1c, Ki67 >14%, HER2neu over-expression, G3). All patients underwent a thoraco-abdominal ceCT and a whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/ MRI. All datasets were evaluated by two experienced radiologists in hybrid imaging regarding suspect lesion count, localization, categorization and diagnostic confidence. Images were interpreted in random order with a reading gap of at least 4 weeks to avoid recognition bias. Histopathological results as well as follow-up imaging served as reference standard. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using Mc Nemars chi² test. Results CT rated the N stage correctly in 64 of 80 (80%, 95% CI:70.0–87.3) patients with a sensitivity of 61.5% (CI:45.9–75.1), a specificity of 97.6% (CI:87.4–99.6), a PPV of 96% (CI:80.5–99.3), and a NPV of 72.7% (CI:59.8–82.7). Compared to this, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI determined the N stage correctly in 71 of 80 (88.75%, CI:80.0–94.0) patients with a sensitivity of 82.1% (CI:67.3–91.0), a specificity of 95.1% (CI:83.9–98.7), a PPV of 94.1% (CI:80.9–98.4) and a NPV of 84.8% (CI:71.8–92.4). Differences in sensitivities were statistically significant (difference 20.6%, CI:-0.02–40.9; p = 0.008). Distant metastases were present in 7/80 patients (8.75%). ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI detected all of the histopathological proven metastases without any false-positive findings, while 3 patients with bone metastases were missed in CT (sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 95.9%). Additionally, CT presented false-positive findings in 3 patients. Conclusion ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has a high diagnostic potential and outperforms CT in assessing the N and M stage in patients with primary breast cancer. CA extern

Introduction: The clinical efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is well established but its effect on new bone formation is still unclear. We aimed to assess the effect of TNFi on bone remodeling processes in the axial skeleton of r-axSpA[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], Deutscher Rheumatologiekongress 2020, 48. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), 34. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh)

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRI and whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer. Material and methods: A total of 104 patients (age 53.4 ± 12.5) with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer were enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI. MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were evaluated separately regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion characterization (malignant/benign) as well as the diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale, 1–5). The N and M stages were assessed according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual in MRI datasets alone and in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI datasets, respectively. In the majority of lesions histopathology served as the reference standard. The remaining lesions were followed-up by imaging and clinical examination. Separately for nodal-positive and nodal-negative women, a McNemar chi² test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity of the N and M stages between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI. Differences in diagnostic confidence scores were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: MRI determined the N stage correctly in 78 of 104 (75%) patients with a sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 0.48–0.75), a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI: 0.76–0.96), a PPV (positive predictive value) of 84.6% % (95% CI: 69.5–0.94), and a NPV (negative predictive value) of 69.2% (95% CI: 0.57–0.8). Corresponding results for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI were 87/104 (83.7%), 75.5% (95% CI: 0.62–0.86), 92.2% (0.81–0.98), 90% (0.78–0.97), and 78.3% (0.66–0.88), showing a significantly better sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI determining malignant lymph nodes (p = 0.008). The M stage was identified correctly in MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in 100 of 104 patients (96.2%). Both modalities correctly staged all 7 patients with distant metastases, leading to false-positive findings in 4 patients in each modality (3.8%). In a lesion-based analysis, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI showed a significantly better performance in correctly determining malignant lesions (85.8% vs. 67.1%, difference 18.7% (95% CI: 0.13–0.26), p < 0.0001) and offered a superior diagnostic confidence compared with MRI alone (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has a better diagnostic accuracy for N staging in primary breast cancer patients and provides a significantly higher diagnostic confidence in lesion characterization than MRI alone. But both modalities bear the risk to overestimate the M stage.