Search

Background and Aims While it has been established that high serum phosphorus is associated with mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients, there is limited evidence in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) setting. We evaluated the association of serum phosphorus with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients on PD, and investigated various parameterizations using single and serial measurements of serum phosphorus. Method We utilized data from 7 countries in phase 1 (2014-2017) of the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS): Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Thailand, the UK, and the US. We investigated the association of serum phosphorus and 3 outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and MACE (CV mortality + non-fatal angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). We parameterized serum phosphorus using 4 different methods: (1) single measurement of baseline serum phosphorus [most recent measurement during 6-month run-in period]; (2) mean serum phosphorus over a 6-month run-in period; (3) number of months (over the past 6 months) with serum phosphorus above the target range (>4.5 mg/dL); (4) mean area-under-the-curve (AUC), calculated as the average amount of time spent with serum phosphorus >4.5 mg/dL multiplied by the extent to which this threshold was exceeded over 6 months. Cox regression was used to estimate the association between each of these 4 exposures with the time-to-event outcomes, in models thoroughly adjusted for possible confounders. Follow-up began after the 6-month run-in period and continued until the outcome occurred, 7 days after leaving the facility due to transfer or change in kidney replacement therapy modality, loss to follow-up, or end of study phase (whichever event occurred first). Results Our sample consisted of 5904 patients who were on PD. Those with higher serum phosphorus levels were younger and had lower hemoglobin levels. Compared to patients with serum phosphorus ≥3.5 to 1 to 2; and 1.67 (1.15, 2.41) for AUC >2. Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) results showed that, among the 4 exposures, AUC was the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality, and the single phosphorus measure was the weakest predictor. Associations between serum phosphorus and adverse outcomes were generally stronger for CV death and MACE than for all-cause mortality [Table]. Conclusion As seen in HD patients, this analysis demonstrates that serum phosphorus is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in patients on PD. When considering serial measurements of serum phosphorus, rates of adverse events began to rise at phosphorus levels >4.5 mg/dL. As recommended by KDIGO guidelines, serial measurements that consider a history of serum phosphorus excursions >4.5 mg/dL should be considered when assessing risks of adverse outcomes.

Previously lacking in the literature, we describe longitudinal patterns of anemia prescriptions for non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) patients under nephrologist care. We analyzed data from 2818 Stage 3-5 NDD-CKD patients from Brazil, Germany, and the US, naïve to anemia medications (oral iron, intravenous [IV] iron, or erythropoiesis stimulating agent [ESA]) at enrollment in the CKDopps. We report the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of medication initiation stratified by baseline characteristics. Even in patients with hemoglobin (Hb)

Background and Aims Previously lacking in the literature, this analysis aims to comprehensively describe longitudinal patterns of anaemia management, including prescriptions of ESA and iron replacement, for non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) stage 3 to 5 patients under nephrologist care. Method We analysed data from a prospective cohort of 2455 NDD-CKD patients from Brazil, Germany and the US, who were not using anaemia medications (oral iron, intravenous [IV] iron, or erythropoiesis stimulating agent [ESA]) at enrolment in the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDOPPS). We excluded 26% (N=862) of patients who were using any anaemia treatment from the source population at CKDOPPS study entry; we further excluded patients with (a) missing data for demographics and/or clinical history, or (b) no laboratory and medication data during follow-up. We reported the cumulative incidence (CI) of anaemia treatment initiation, stratified by biochemical parameters and patient characteristics. For patients that started therapy, we report the frequency of medication type at the moment of initiation, as well as switches and discontinuation over 12 months. Results The CI of any anaemia treatment initiation at 12 months was 18% for the whole sample, and 54% for patients with haemoglobin (Hb) Conclusion Anaemia treatment is initiated in a limited number of NDD-CKD patients with clinical signs that would indicate to do so, and many patients discontinue treatment, for reasons yet to be clarified. Although haemoglobin was the main factor associated with prescriptions, only about half of patients with Hb