Search

Your search keyword '"Brzoska, Tina"' showing total 25 results
Start Over Author "Brzoska, Tina"
25 results on '"Brzoska, Tina"'

11. Vergleich von OLSA und GÖSA zur binauralen Sprachaudiometrie im Störschall an Normalhörenden

Author

Dziemba, Oliver, Putze, Anne, Brzoska, Tina, and Busch, Chia-Jung

Subjects
Medicine and health
Abstract

Die Intelligibility Level Difference (ILD) und Binaural Intelligibility Level Difference (BILD) sind sprachaudiometrische Maße für das Sprachverstehen in räumlichen Störschall-Nutzschall-Situationen [ref:1]. Diese beiden Maße ergeben sich aus der Differenz der Sprachverständlichkeitsschwelle [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Kann die Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste den CI-Reha-Prozess darstellen?

Author

Dziemba, Oliver, Brzoska, Tina, and Busch, Chia-Jung

Subjects
Medicine and health
Abstract

Die Bestimmung des prozentualen Hörverlusts (pHV) aus dem Tonaudiogramm nach Röser 1973 [ref:1] oder aus dem Sprachaudiogramm nach Boenninghaus und Röser 1973 [ref:2] sind weithin eingesetzte Methoden zur quantitativen Bemessung des Hörvermögens. Die Bestimmung [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Laserchirurgische Verkleinerung der unteren Nasenmuscheln mittels Diodenlaser - subjektive Effektivität und Langzeitwirkung

Author

Brzoska, Tina, Beule, Achim, Kaftan, Silke, and Hosemann, Werner

Subjects
ddc: 610, 610 Medical sciences, Medicine
Abstract

Zielsetzung: Nasenatmungsbehinderung aufgrund hyperplastischer unterer Nasenmuscheln ist für viele Patienten eine subjektive Belastung. Es gibt vielfältigste Methoden die Conchae nasales inferiores zu verkleinern. Eine ambulante, wenig belastende und effektive Möglichkeit stellt die Verkleinerung[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], 83. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie

Published
2012

25. [Suitability of determining percentage hearing loss for monitoring cochlear implant rehabilitation].

Author

Dziemba OC, Brzoska T, Ihler F, and Busch CJ

Subjects
Humans, Retrospective Studies, Audiometry, Pure-Tone methods, Cochlear Implantation methods, Cochlear Implants, Speech Perception, Hearing Loss diagnosis, Hearing Loss surgery, Deafness rehabilitation
Abstract

Background: Calculation of percentage hearing loss (pHV) from the pure-tune audiogram according to Röser in 1973 or from the speech audiogram according to Boenninghaus and Röser in 1973 is a method still applied for quantitative assessment of hearing. However, this is not common for the evaluation of postoperative results of implantable hearing systems. During the regular work-up after cochlear implantation (CI) in Germany, all necessary parameters are available for calculation of pHV either from categorical loudness scaling (pHV KLS ) or speech-recognition threshold (pHV FB )., Objective: The parameters pHV KLS and pHV FB are introduced and calculated from data available from clinical routine. Their potential applicability for assessment of the result of CI is evaluated., Materials and Methods: This study comprises retrospective chart review of audiological parameters from 66 CI procedures in one tertiary referral center. pHV KLS was calculated from the equal loudness curve 5 CU, pHV FB from the Freiburg speech test in free field., Results: While pHV KLS shows small variation, the variation in pHV FB is initially larger but decreases over time. Furthermore, starting from initial fitting, the mean pHV shows convergence over time. The difference between pHV FB and pHV KLS is positive and statistically significant., Conclusion: It is possible to calculate pHV KLS and pHV FB from routine data. A correlation of the difference between pHV FB and pHV KLS with successful CI performance seems plausible., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results