Search

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility, agreement, and sensitivity of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) versus spectral Doppler assessment of right ventricular (RV) myocardial performance index (MPI) in midgestation fetuses in both a normal and a disease state.MethodsRV MPI was calculated using pulsed-wave DTI and spectral Doppler in normal pregnancies (n = 69) and in women with pregestational diabetes (n = 51). Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Student's t tests were used for comparisons of differences.ResultsIn normal fetuses, RV MPI derived by the two methods showed no statistical difference, were interchangeable (DTI, 0.51 ± 0.10; spectral Doppler, 0.50 ± 0.12; P = .686), and were in agreement by Bland-Altman analysis. However, in fetuses of mothers with diabetes, the two methods produced different RV MPI measurements (DTI, 0.56 ± 0.10; spectral Doppler, 0.51 ± 0.12; P < .001). Intraobserver and interobserver bias was lower for DTI.ConclusionsThe DTI method of measuring fetal RV MPI is more sensitive, has less variability and more precision, and is better able to demonstrate subtle abnormalities in cardiac function than the spectral Doppler method in diabetic versus normal pregnancies.

Objectives: "Heart sparing" refers to prominent antegrade fetal coronary artery (CA) blood flow readily visualized by color Doppler and is a harbinger of poor outcome in growth restricted fetus, but little is known of the features and presentation of heart sparing in normally grown fetuses. Our objective was to describe heart sparing effects in normally grown fetuses, and compare the presentation and outcome of heart sparing between fetuses with growth restriction and those who were normally grown. Methods: In a series of fetuses with prominent antegrade CA flow, we assessed Doppler flow profiles in the aortic isthmus, ductus venosus (DV), umbilical vein (UV), umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA). We calculated MCA and UA systolic/diastolic ratios and the cerebral placental ratio, and measured fetal biometry. We evaluated cardiac function using the myocardial performance index (MPI) and the cardiovascular profile score (CVPS). Results: Ten fetuses with heart sparing had normal DV flow at 24-36.6 (mean 30.9) weeks of gestation. Five had growth restriction (Group 1); 4/5 had normal MPI and CVPS, and one died. Five were normally grown (Group 2); 5/5 had elevated MPI and decreased CVPS, of these 2 died in utero and one died immediately after birth despite urgent delivery. Coronary arteries were normal after birth or autopsy. Conclusions: Heart sparing confers a poor prognosis in fetal growth restriction and in normally grown fetuses with cardiac dysfunction. We suggest CA flow be assessed in all high-risk fetuses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]