Search

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib in treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in the phase 3 CLEAR study. We report results of an exploratory post hoc analysis of tumor response data based on baseline metastatic characteristics of patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib, at the final overall survival analysis time point of CLEAR (cutoff: July 31, 2022). Treatment-naïve adults with aRCC were randomized to: lenvatinib (20 mg PO QD in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (n = 355; 200 mg IV Q3W); lenvatinib plus everolimus (not reported here); or sunitinib (n = 357; 50 mg PO QD; 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The most common (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab; sunitinib, respectively) metastatic site was lung (71.0%; 63.9%), followed by lymph node (45.6%; 43.7%), bone (22.5%; 24.9%), and liver (17.7%; 19.6%). Across treatment arms, ≥65% had two or more metastatic organs/sites involved, >80% of patients had nontarget lesions, and ~45% had baseline sums of diameters of target lesions ≥60 mm. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated greater progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response versus sunitinib across evaluable subgroups regardless of site or size of baseline metastasis or number of metastatic sites at baseline. Overall survival generally trended to favor lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib; and tumor shrinkage was greater across sites (lung, lymph node, liver, and bone) for patients in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab arm versus the sunitinib arm. These results further support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care in patients with aRCC regardless of site or size of baseline metastasis or the number of metastatic sites., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: In CLEAR, lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (L+P) significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib in first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We report results from CLEAR biomarker analyses., Methods: PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing assays (whole exome sequencing/RNA-sequencing) were performed on archival tumor specimens. For IHC-derived/RNA-sequencing analyses, a continuous analysis was performed adjusting by Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score for: PD-L1 CPS versus best overall response (BOR)/PFS; and each gene-signature score (T-cell inflamed gene-expression profile [Tcell inf GEP]/non-Tcell inf GEP signatures including proliferation and angiogenesis) versus BOR/PFS. Association between mutation status of RCC driver genes and PFS were analyzed for genes for which ≥20 patients per arm had oncogenic alterations. Association of molecular subtypes with outcome was evaluated with baseline KPS adjustments. The set of biomarkers evaluated and statistical significance criteria for PD-L1 CPS, gene signature scores, and molecular subtypes were pre-specified., Results: Within-arm analyses using continuous values showed no association between PD-L1 levels and BOR/PFS for either treatment. PFS hazard ratios between arms were similar regardless of mutant or wildtype subgroups of RCC driver genes (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C). No associations between PFS and gene-signature scores were observed for L+P. With sunitinib, high proliferation and MYC signature scores showed shorter PFS; high angiogenesis and microvessel density signature scores showed longer PFS. Six new molecular subtypes were defined. Tumors of patients with favorable/intermediate risk were enriched in angiogenesis and angiogenesis/stromal clusters; those with poor risk were enriched in proliferative and unclassified (low-Tcell inf GEP/low-angiogenesis/low-proliferation) clusters. No association between molecular subtypes and PFS for L+P/sunitinib was observed (after adjustment for KPS and gene signatures that were individually associated with PFS)., Conclusions: Improvements in ORR and PFS for L+P versus sunitinib in aRCC were observed consistently across a range of biomarker subgroups defined using RCC driver mutations, PD-L1, gene expression signatures, and molecular subtypes., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy after surgery for renal-cell carcinoma was approved on the basis of a significant improvement in disease-free survival in the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Whether the results regarding overall survival from the third prespecified interim analysis of the trial would also favor pembrolizumab was uncertain., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had an increased risk of recurrence after surgery to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until recurrence, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. A significant improvement in disease-free survival according to investigator assessment (the primary end point) was shown previously. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point., Results: A total of 496 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to receive placebo. As of September 15, 2023, the median follow-up was 57.2 months. The disease-free survival benefit was consistent with that in previous analyses (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87). A significant improvement in overall survival was observed with pembrolizumab as compared with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group; the benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Pembrolizumab was associated with a higher incidence of serious adverse events of any cause (20.7%, vs. 11.5% with placebo) and of grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to pembrolizumab or placebo (18.6% vs. 1.2%). No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab therapy., Conclusions: Adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, as compared with placebo, among participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence after surgery. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Introduction: The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Prognostic features including presence and/or site of baseline metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features have been associated with disease and treatment success. This subsequent analysis explores outcomes in patients with or without specific prognostic features., Methods: In CLEAR, patients with clear cell RCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg/day) plus everolimus (5 mg/day), or sunitinib alone (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). In this report, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were all assessed in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and the sunitinib arms, based on baseline features: lung metastases, bone metastases, liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid histology., Results: In all the assessed subgroups, median PFS was longer with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab than with sunitinib treatment, notably among patients with baseline bone metastases (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) and patients with sarcomatoid features (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.84). Median OS favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib irrespective of metastatic lesions at baseline, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features. Of interest, among patients with baseline bone metastases the HR for survival was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83) and among patients with sarcomatoid features the HR for survival was 0.91 (95% CI 0.32-2.58); though for many groups, median OS was not reached. ORR also favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib across all subgroups; similarly, complete responses also followed this pattern., Conclusion: Efficacy outcomes improved following treatment with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in patients with RCC-irrespective of the presence or absence of baseline lung metastases, baseline bone metastases, baseline liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, or sarcomatoid features. These findings corroborate those of the primary CLEAR study analysis in the overall population and support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard of care in 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02811861., Competing Interests: VG: Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, EISAI, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, ONO Pharmaceutical, Novartis/AAA; Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS, EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Cureteq, Debiopharm, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech; Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, SeaGen; Steering Committee Member: BMS, EISAI, Ipsen, Novartis, PharmaMar; Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Janssen, Pfizer. Non-Financial Interests: Membership: ASCO, ESMO, German medical Oncology and Hematology Society; Advisory role: German Cancer Society; Leadership role: Working Group medical oncology (AIO). TP: reports research funding from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Incyte, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; support for attending meetings or travel from Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. ME: reports research funding from Kissei, Sanofi, Astellas, ONO, Takeda, and Bayer; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, ONO, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Janssen, and Merck. SYR: reports grants or contracts from Amgen, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Beigene, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Eisai; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Amgen, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Indivumed, Beigene, Eisai, and Daiichi Sankyo. CP: reports consulting fees from Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, General Electric, Ipsen, and MSD; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, MSD, the European Society of Medical Oncology, and the Italian Association for Medical Oncology. RM: reports research funding, paid to their institution from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Pfizer, and Aveo Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. TEH: reports grants or contracts, paid to their institution, from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas Pharma, Bayer/Onyx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and Pfizer. MJM-V: reports consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, Ipsen, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Roche; and support for attending meetings or travel from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Roche. EW: reports research support, paid to their institution from Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech; honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Merck, and Roche. JCG: reports consulting fees for an advisory board meeting from MSD Australia, Bristol Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen–Cilag, Ipsen, MSD Australia, and AstraZeneca Australia; and support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca Australia, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. PM: reports research support, paid to their institution from Roche. TB: reports institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Merck, and Novartis; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas, Janssen, and Sanofi/Aventis; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, and Pfizer; and institutional receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Servier. TT: reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Ono Pharmaceutical. JEB: employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. RP: employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. CH: employee of Eisai Inc. CO: employee of Eisai Ltd. JM: employee of Eisai Inc. TKC: reports institutional and/or personal, paid and/or unpaid support for research, advisory boards, consultancy, and honoraria from: Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, IQVA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Nuscan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events Peerview, OncLive, MJH and others, outside the submitted work. Institutional patents filed on molecular alterations and immunotherapy response/toxicity, and ctDNA. Equity: Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio, CureResponse. Committees: NCCN, GU Steering Committee, ASCO/ESMO, ACCRU, KidneyCan. Medical writing and editorial assistance support may have been funded by Communications companies in part. No speaker’s bureau. Mentored several non-US citizens on research projects with potential funding in part from non-US sources/Foreign Components. The institution Dana-Farber Cancer Institute may have received additional independent funding of drug companies or/and royalties potentially involved in research around the subject matter. TKC is supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE 2P50CA101942-16 and Program 5P30CA006516-56, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, Pan Mass Challenge, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Fund and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFCI. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Grünwald, Powles, Eto, Kopyltsov, Rha, Porta, Motzer, Hutson, Méndez-Vidal, Hong, Winquist, Goh, Maroto, Buchler, Takagi, Burgents, Perini, He, Okpara, McKenzie and Choueiri.)

Background: The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-564 study showed improved disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo after surgery in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma at an increased risk of recurrence. The analysis reported here, with an additional 6 months of follow-up, was designed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus placebo, as well as additional secondary and exploratory endpoints., Methods: In the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial, adults aged 18 years or older with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence were enrolled at 213 hospitals and cancer centres in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Eligible participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had undergone nephrectomy 12 weeks or less before randomisation, and had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via central permuted block randomisation (block size of four) to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by metastatic disease status (M0 vs M1), and the M0 group was further stratified by ECOG performance status and geographical region. All participants and investigators involved in study treatment administration were masked to the treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly assigned to a treatment). Safety was assessed in the safety population, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or placebo. As the primary endpoint was met at the first interim analysis, updated data are reported without p values. This study is ongoing, but no longer recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03142334., Findings: Between June 30, 2017, and Sept 20, 2019, 994 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=496) or placebo (n=498). Median follow-up, defined as the time from randomisation to data cutoff (June 14, 2021), was 30·1 months (IQR 25·7-36·7). Disease-free survival was better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50-0·80]). Median disease-free survival was not reached in either group. The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (in 14 [3%] of 496 participants) and increased alanine aminotransferase (in 11 [2%]) in the pembrolizumab group, and hypertension (in 13 [3%] of 498 participants) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events attributed to study treatment occurred in 59 (12%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and one (<1%) participant in the placebo group. No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab., Interpretation: Updated results from KEYNOTE-564 support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy as a standard of care for participants with renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TP reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Incyte, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Incyte, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; research funding paid to institution from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. PT reports research funding from MSD. SHP reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Janssen Oncology and Lilly; and research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical. Bxports having served as a consultant or adviser for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, and Pfizer/EMD Serono; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, Ipsen, Merck, MSD Oncology, and Pfizer; research funding paid to institution from Calithera Biosciences, Ipsen, MSD Oncology, and Pfizer/EMD Serono; serving as a speaker for Eisai, MSD Oncology, and Pfizer; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from EUSA Pharma and Ipsen. TF reports research funding paid to institution from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and MSD; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Roche. SNS reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Bicycle Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boxer Capital, Duke Street Bio, Eisai, Ellipses Pharma, EMD Serono, EUSA Pharma, MedAnnex, MSD, Pfizer, and Vaccitech; having served as a speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, and Ipsen; research funding paid to institution from BiolineRx, BioNTech, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, MSD, Nouscom, Nucana, Roche, Sapience Therapeutics, Scancell, Sierra Oncology, and Verastem; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, and Ipsen. HG reports personal speaker fees from MSD; and personal advisory fees from MSD, Roche, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Ipsen. JLL reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Pfizer; having served as an advisr or consultant for Alteogen, AstraZeneca, BMS Korea, GI Innovation, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Aventis; research funding paid to institution from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Seattle Genetics; and owns stock in Amgen, BeiGene, Black Diamond Therapeutics, Innovent Biologics, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Myovant Sciences, and Zymeworks. NS reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, MSD, and Roche; having served as a speaker for Pfizer; and research funding from MSD. AT-V reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Sanofi; having served as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding paid to institution from Pfizer; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. MG-G reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Amgen, Astellas Medivation, AstraZeneca, Bayer/Onyx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding paid to institution from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Roche. MM reports research funding from MSD. NBH reports having served as a consultant or adviser for AVEO, Calithera Biosciences, Eisai, Exelixis, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech; and has provided expert testimony for Lilly. PS reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; research funding paid to institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiltern, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Merrimack, MSD, Parexel, PAREXEL/Puma Biotechnology, PPD Global, Regeneron, and Tesaro; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Pierre Fabre and Roche. JEB and LX are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA. KI is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, and owns stock in Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA. DIQ reports having served as a consultant or adviser for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Oncology, MSD, Myovant Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, and US Biotest; honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, MSD, Myovant Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics; research funding paid to institution from Genentech/Roche, Merck, and Pfizer; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Exelexis, Merck, and Roche. TKC reports institutional and personal support, paid and unpaid support for research, participating in advisory boards, consultancy, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Nuscan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, UpToDate, and CME events (Peerview, OncLive, and MJH), outside the submitted work; institutional patents filed on molecular mutations, immunotherapy response and toxicity, and ctDNA; equity in Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio; being part of committees in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, GU Steering Committee, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, Academic and Community Cancer Research United, and KidneyCAN; having mentored several non-US citizens on research projects partly funded by non-US sources; and additional independent funding from drug companies or royalties for research around the subject matter paid to institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The chemokine receptor, CCR7, directs the migration of dendritic cells (DCs) from peripheral tissue to draining lymph nodes (LNs). However, it is unknown whether all pulmonary DCs possess migratory potential. Using novel Ccr7(gfp) reporter mice, we found that Ccr7 is expressed in CD103⁺ and a CD14(med/lo) subset of CD11b(hi) classical (c)DCs but not in monocyte-derived (mo)DCs, including Ly-6C(hi)CD11b(hi) inflammatory DCs and CD14(hi)CD11b(hi) DCs. Consequently, cDCs migrated to lung-draining LNs but moDCs did not. Mice lacking the chemokine receptor, CCR2, also lacked inflammatory DCs in the lung after lipopolysaccharide inhalation but retained normal levels of migratory DCs. Conversely, the lungs of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L)-deficient mice lacked cDCs but retained moDCs, which were functionally mature but did not express Ccr7 and were uniformly non-migratory. Thus, the migratory properties of pulmonary DCs are determined by their developmental lineage.

The inflammasome is a proteolysis complex that generates the active forms of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. Inflammasome activation is mediated by NLR proteins that respond to microbial and nonmicrobial stimuli. Among NLRs, NLRP3 senses the widest array of stimuli and enhances adaptive immunity. However, its role in antitumor immunity is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the function of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the immune response using dendritic cell vaccination against the poorly immunogenic melanoma cell line B16-F10. Vaccination of Nlrp3(-/-) mice led to a relative 4-fold improvement in survival relative to control animals. Immunity depended on CD8(+) T cells and exhibited immune specificity and memory. Increased vaccine efficacy in Nlrp3(-/-) hosts did not reflect differences in dendritic cells but rather differences in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Although Nlrp3 was expressed in MDSCs, the absence of Nlrp3 did not alter either their functional capacity to inhibit T cells or their presence in peripheral lymphoid tissues. Instead, the absence of Nlrp3 caused a 5-fold reduction in the number of tumor-associated MDSCs found in host mice. Adoptive transfer experiments also showed that Nlrp3(-/-) MDSCs were less efficient in reaching the tumor site. Depleting MDSCs with an anti-Gr-1 antibody increased the survival of tumor-bearing wild-type mice but not Nlrp3(-/-) mice. We concluded that Nlrp3 was critical for accumulation of MDSCs in tumors and for inhibition of antitumor T-cell immunity after dendritic cell vaccination. Our findings establish an unexpected role for Nlrp3 in impeding antitumor immune responses, suggesting novel approaches to improve the response to antitumor vaccines by limiting Nlrp3 signaling., (©2010 AACR.)

In murine models, the adoptive transfer of CD4(+) /CD25(+) regulatory T cells (T(regs) ) inhibited graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Previous work has indicated a critical role for the adhesion molecule L-selectin (CD62L) in the function of T(regs) in preventing GvHD. Here we examined the capacity of naive wild-type (WT), CD62L(-/-) and ex vivo expanded CD62L(Lo) T(regs) to inhibit acute GvHD. Surprisingly, we found that CD62L(-/-) T(regs) were potent suppressors of GvHD, whereas CD62L(Lo) T(regs) were unable to inhibit disease despite being functionally competent to suppress allo T cell responses in vitro. Concomitant with improved outcomes, WT and CD62L(-/-) T(regs) significantly reduced liver pathology and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine production, although CD62L(-/-) T(regs) were less effective in reducing lung pathology. While accumulation of CD62L(-/-) T(regs) in GvHD target organs was equivalent to WT T(regs) , CD62L(-/-) T(regs) did not migrate as well as WT T(regs) to peripheral lymph nodes (PLNs) over the first 2 weeks posttransplantation. This work demonstrated that CD62L was dispensable for T(reg) -mediated protection from GvHD., (©2010 The Authors Journal compilation©2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) is expressed on the surface of naive T cells, and plays a critical role in their movement into secondary lymphoid tissue. Here, we show that murine T cells lacking CCR7 (CCR7(-/-)) generate attenuated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) responses compared with wild-type (WT) cells, with the difference varying inversely with the degree of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) disparity between the donor and recipient. CCR7(-/-) T cells exhibited an impaired ability to traffic to recipient lymph nodes, with an increased capacity to home to the spleen. CCR7(-/-) T cells, however, demonstrated a reduced ability to undergo in vivo expansion in the spleen due to impaired interactions with splenic antigen-presenting cells. On a cellular level, CCR7(-/-) T cells were functionally competent, demonstrating a normal in vitro proliferative capacity and a preserved ability to produce inflammatory cytokines. Importantly, CCR7(-/-) T cells were capable of generating robust graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) responses in vivo, as well as complete donor T-cell reconstitution. CCR7(-/-) regulatory T cells were able to protect against lethal GVHD when administered before WT conventional T cells. Our data suggest that CCR7 inhibition in the early posttransplantation period may represent a feasible new therapeutic approach for acute GVHD attenuation without compromising GVL responses.

We earlier showed that therapeutic vaccination of FVB/N mice with alphaviral replicon particles expressing rat neuET-VRP induced regression of established neu-expressing tumors. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of neuET-VRPs in a tolerant mouse model using mice with transgenic expression of neu. Using the same approach that induced regression of 70 mm(2) tumors in FVB/N mice, we were unable to inhibit tumor growth in tolerant neu-N mice, despite showing neu-specific B-cell and T-cell responses post vaccination. As neu-N mice have a limited T-cell repertoire specific to neu, we hypothesized that the absence of these T cells led to differences in the vaccine response. However, transfer of neu-specific T cells from vaccinated FVB/N mice was not effective in inducing tumor regression, as these cells did not proliferate in the tumor-draining lymph node. Vaccination given with low-dose cyclophosphamide to deplete regulatory T cells delayed tumor growth but did not result in tumor regression. Finally, we showed that T cells given with vaccination were effective in inhibiting tumor growth, if administered with approaches to deplete myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Our data show that both central deletion of lymphocytes and peripheral immunosuppressive mechanisms are present in neu-N mice. However, the major impediment to successful vaccination is the peripheral tumor-induced immune suppression.

While dendritic cell (DC) vaccines can protect hosts from tumor challenge, their ability to effectively inhibit the growth of established tumors remains indeterminate. Previously, we have shown that human DCs transduced with Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon particles (VRPs) were potent stimulators of antigen-specific T cells in vitro. Therefore, we investigated the ability of VRP-transduced DCs (VRP-DCs) to induce therapeutic immunity in vivo against tumors overexpressing the neu oncoprotein. Transduction of murine DCs with VRPs resulted in high-level transgene expression, DC maturation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Vaccination with VRP-DCs expressing a truncated neu oncoprotein induced robust neu-specific CD8(+) T cell and anti-neu IgG responses. Furthermore, a single vaccination with VRP-DCs induced the regression of large established tumors in wild-type mice. Interestingly, depletion of CD4(+), but not CD8(+), T cells completely abrogated inhibition of tumor growth following vaccination. Taken together, our results demonstrate that VRP-DC vaccines induce potent immunity against established tumors, and emphasize the importance of the generation of both CD4(+) T cell and B cell responses for efficient tumor inhibition. These findings provide the rationale for future evaluation of VRP-DC vaccines in the clinical setting.

During acclimation to dilute seawater, the specific activity of Na+,K+-ATPase increases substantially in the posterior gills of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. To determine whether this increase occurs through regulation of pre-existing enzyme or synthesis of new enzyme, mRNA and protein levels were measured over short (<24 h) and long (18 days) time courses. Na+,K+-ATPase expression, both mRNA and protein, did not change during the initial 24-h exposure to dilute seawater (10 ppt salinity). Thus, osmoregulation in C. sapidus during acute exposure to low salinity likely involves either modulation of existing enzyme or mechanisms other than an increase in the amount of Na+,K+-ATPase enzyme. However, crabs exposed to dilute seawater over 18 days showed a 300% increase in Na+,K+-ATPase specific activity as well as a 200% increase in Na+,K+-ATPase protein levels. Thus, it appears that the increase in Na+,K+-ATPase activity during chronic exposure results from the synthesis of new enzyme. The relative amounts of mRNA for the alpha-subunit increased substantially (by 150%) during the acclimation process, but once the crabs had fully acclimated to low salinity, the mRNA levels had decreased and were not different from levels in crabs fully acclimated to high salinity. Thus, there is transient induction of the Na+,K+-ATPase mRNA levels during acclimation to dilute seawater.

Low oxygen (hypoxia) and elevated CO2 (hypercapnia, are characteristic of estuarine environments. Although hypoxia and hypercapnic hypoxia decrease the resistance of shrimp to bacterial pathogens, their direct effects on the immune system are unknown. Here we present evidence demonstrating in the penaeid shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei that both hypoxia and hypercapnic hypoxia affect the localization of bacteria, their conversion from culturable to non-culturable status (bacteriostasis), and their elimination from hemolymph and selected tissues. Shrimp were injected with a sublethal dose of a pathogenic strain of Vibrio campbellii expressing green fluorescent protein and resistance to kanamycin. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine the number of intact V. campbellii in hemolymph, gills, hepatopancreas, heart, and lymphoid organ. Selective plating was used to quantify the injected bacteria that remained culturable. We found that both hypercapnic hypoxia and hypoxia increased the percentage of culturable bacteria recovered from the hemolymph and tissues, suggesting an overall decrease in bacteriostatic activity. Hypoxia and hypercapnic hypoxia generally increased the distribution of intact V. campbellii to the hepatopancreas and the gills, which are major targets for the pathogenic effects of Vibrio spp., without affecting the number of intact bacteria in the lymphoid organ, a main site of bacterial accumulation and bacteriostatic activity.

Although numerous mechanisms of immune defense have been described in crustaceans, the tissue distribution and fate of live bacteria introduced into the host remain unclear. In the present study, Litopenaeus vannamei were injected with a sub-lethal dose of kanamycin-resistant Vibrio campbellii expressing green fluorescent protein. Accumulation of intact bacteria was quantified by real-time PCR, while bacteriostasis was quantified as the percentage of intact bacteria that could not be recovered by selective plating. Over the 240 min examined, the lymphoid organ contained the greatest number of intact V. campbellii per gram tissue as well as the lowest percentage of culturable V. campbellii compared to other tissues, including the hemolymph. In contrast, the gills and hepatopancreas accumulated intact bacteria, but contained a significantly greater percentage of culturable bacteria than the hemolymph after 240 min. These data suggest that the lymphoid organ plays a major role in bacterial uptake and bacteriostasis in penaeid shrimp.