Search

The article discusses the various ocular and respiratory illnesses that can be caused due to an indoor swimming pool. The case of a child recently reported in Nebraska is discussed to support the survey.

Background Despite recommendations for adherence reporting in clinical trials involving an oral anticancer agent, the frequency and methods of adherence reporting are inconsistent. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the frequency and type of adherence measures used in oncology and hematology clinical trials of oral anticancer agents and their association with study characteristics including quality, cancer type, stage and treatment type. Design PubMed was searched of all randomized controlled clinical trials assessing self-administered pharmacological interventions in patients with cancer and published over two years, between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012 were evaluated. Results We identified 70 publications in the PubMed database, comprising 45,118 total patients. Adherence reporting was present in 14 of 70 trials (20%); quantitative reporting was present in three of 70 trials (4%). Method of adherence assessment varied and included medication count, medication diaries and patient self-report. There was no association between adherence reporting and study quality or other study characteristics, although there was a trend towards increased reporting in breast cancer studies, with 46% of the studies reporting adherence (p = 0.0621). In a preliminary analysis, hematology studies (mean Jadad score 2.19 ± 1.47) were found to have significantly lower quality when compared to non-hematology trials (mean Jadad score 3.39 ± 1.37, p = 0.0034). Conclusion This systematic review demonstrates adherence reporting in clinical trials of oral anticancer agents is infrequent. When reported, adherence was not associated with overall study quality or other study characteristics. Given the potential effects of non-adherence on study power and validity, adherence reporting should be encouraged in oncology and hematology clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[english] Purpose: The acquisition of clinical-technical skills is of particular importance for the doctors of tomorrow. Procedural skills are often trained for the first time in skills laboratories, which provide a sheltered learning environment. However, costs to implement and maintain skills laboratories are considerably high. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate students’ patterns of attendance of voluntary skills-lab training sessions and thereby answer the following question: Is it possible to measure an effect of the theoretical construct related to motivational psychology described in the literature – ‘Assessment drives learning’ – reflected in patterns of attendance at voluntary skills-lab training sessions? By answering this question, design recommendations for curriculum planning and resource management should be derived.Method: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of student skills-lab attendance related to voluntary basic and voluntary advanced skills-lab sessions was conducted. The attendance patterns of a total of 340 third-year medical students in different successive year groups from the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg were assessed.Results: Students showed a preference for voluntary basic skills-lab training sessions, which were relevant to clinical skills assessment, especially at the beginning and at the end of the term. Voluntary advanced skills-lab training sessions without reference to clinical skills assessment were used especially at the beginning of the term, but declined towards the end of term.Conclusion: The results show a clear influence of assessments on students’ attendance at skills-lab training sessions. First recommendations for curriculum design and resource management will be described. Nevertheless, further prospective research studies will be necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the motivational factors impacting students’ utilisation of voluntary skills-lab training in order to reach a sufficient concordance between students’ requirements and faculty offers, as well as resource management.[german] Zielsetzung: Die Vermittlung klinisch-praktischer Fertigkeiten ist von entscheidender Bedeutung für die Berufsfähigkeit angehender Ärzte. Prozedurale Fertigkeiten werden dabei häufig zu allererst in sogenannten Skills-Labs trainiert, die eine geschützte Lernumgebung gewährleisten. Die Implementierung und auch Pflege von Skills-Labs stellt allerdings eine nicht geringfügige finanzielle Herausforderung dar. Aus diesem Grund hat sich die vorliegende Arbeit zum Ziel gesetzt, die Besuchsfrequenzen und –muster im Rahmen freiwilliger Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten zu untersuchen, um folgende Frage zu beantworten: Kann der in der Literatur beschriebene, motivationspsychologische Effekt des “Assessment drives learning” festgestellt werden und spiegelt sich dieser in dem Besuchsverhalten von Studierenden in freiwilligen Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten wider? Ausgehend von den Studienergebnissen sollen Empfehlungen für die Curriculumsplanung und das Ressourcenmanagement abgeleitet werden.Methode:. Eine retrospektive, deskriptive Analyse studentischen Inanspruchnahmeverhaltens sowohl von freiwilligen „Basic“- als auch „Advanced“ Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten wurde durchgeführt. Hierzu wurden Teilnahmemuster von 340 Medizinstudierenden des dritten Studienjahres verschiedener Jahrgänge an der Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg näher untersucht.Ergebnisse: Die Studierenden zeigten besonders zu Beginn und am Ende des Semesters eine Präferenz für die Teilnahme an freiwilligen “Basic“ Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten, die für die klinisch-praktische Prüfung relevant sind. Freiwillige “Advanced“ Skills-Lab”-Unterrichtseinheiten ohne Bezug zur klinisch-praktischen Prüfung wurden vor allem zu Beginn des Semesters genutzt, mit einem Rückgang der Besuche gegen Ende des Semesters.Fazit: Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen deutlichen Einfluss klinisch-praktischer Prüfungen auf die studentischen Teilnahmen an Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten. Empfehlungen für die Planung des Curriculums und das Ressourcenmanagement werden dargestellt. Weitere, prospektive Studien sind erforderlich, um ein umfassenderes Verständnis motivationaler Faktoren zu entwickeln, die Studierende dazu veranlassen, freiwillige Skills-Lab-Unterrichtseinheiten zu besuchen. Damit kann eine noch erfolgreichere Abstimmung zwischen studentischen Anforderungen und Fakultätsangeboten sowie ein effizientes Ressourcenmanagement erzielt werden.