Search

Introduction: Busulfan is a common component of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) conditioning, however interpatient pharmacokinetic variability can result in enhanced toxicity or increased relapse risk. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can minimize variability, yet the optimal frequency of TDM is unknown. We compared outcomes for patients with one versus two sets of busulfan TDM during myeloablative conditioning (MAC) prior to alloHCT. Methods: We analyzed the impact of busulfan TDM frequency and dose adjustments, with the primary outcome being relapse-free survival (RFS). Other outcomes included the incidence of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), oral mucositis, pulmonary toxicity, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-two patients underwent one set of sampling while 53 patients underwent two sets. Similar baseline characteristics were observed between the groups. There were no significant differences observed in RFS by day +180 (77.3% vs. 79.2%, p = 1.0), CIR by day +180 (18.2% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.74), or OS (p = 0.73). The incidences of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, SOS, and severe mucositis were also similar. In each group, 63% received busulfan dose adjustments after one set, with 52.8% receiving further dose adjustments following the second set. Conclusion: We observed no significant difference in alloHCT outcomes between patients who underwent one versus two sets of busulfan TDM sampling, suggesting that a single-time TDM and dose adjustment may be adequate to maximize outcomes after MAC alloHCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Busulfan (Bu) is an important component of many conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The therapeutic window of Bu is well characterized, with strong associations between Bu exposure and the clinical outcome in adults (strongest evidence in myelo-ablative setting) and children (all settings). We provide an overview of the literature on Bu as well as a step-by-step guide to the implementation of Bu therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The guide covers the clinical, pharmacological, laboratory and administrative aspects of the procedure. Through this document, we aim to support centers in implementing TDM for Bu to further enhance the success rates of HCT and improve patient outcomes. The Pharmacist Committee of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) encourages all centers to perform TDM for Bu in the aforementioned indications., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MEMM declares honoraria as a speaker, consultancy or advisory role from Daiichy Sankio España, GSK, Gilead, Incyte, Seagen, Servier, all not related to the current topic. ND declares honoraria as a speaker from Novartis and Gilead, and travel grants from Novartis. KK declares honoraria as a speaker from Medac, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and travel grants from Pierre-Fabre, all not related to the current topic. RA declares an unrestricted research grant from Sanofi, not related to the current topic. VD, KNH, AD, KBH, VP, NK, TB, MH, MA and CL declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Busulfan exposure has previously been linked to clinical outcomes, hence the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Study objective was to evaluate the effect of day 1 TDM-guided dosing (regimen d1) versus days 1 + 2 TDM-guided dosing (regimen d1 + 2) on attaining adequate busulfan exposure. In this observational study, we included all adults who received an allogeneic HCT with intravenous once daily busulfan over 4 days as part of the conditioning regimen at the University Medical Centre Utrecht or between July 31, 2014 and November 12, 2021. The primary outcome was attainment of the therapeutic busulfan target (cumulative area under the curve [AUC cum ] 80-100 mg*h/L). Dose adjustment was based on the estimated AUC of the preceding dosing day(s). Additional TDM was performed in the event of large dose adjustments (≥25%). The choice of TDM regimen was solely based on the first day the busulfan dose was administered (regimen d1 + 2 occurred when conditioning started on a Saturday). In all patients, blood sampling was performed on day 4 for evaluation. The AUC cum was estimated using a validated population pharmacokinetic model. Busulfan target exposure was compared between both TDM regimen groups using a propensity score adjusted logistic regression model. The variance in the AUC cum between the TDM regimens was compared using the F-test. Patients were stratified for age (categorical). In regimen d1, 87.6% (n = 113/129) attained a therapeutic busulfan exposure, while in regimen d1 + 2 a proportion of 97.4% was found (n = 74/76, adjusted odds ratio for non-therapeutic AUC = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.04-0.89). Variance of busulfan exposure in the regimen d1 group (SD = 6.8 mg*h/L) differed significantly from the variance in the regimen d1 + 2 group (SD = 3.6 mg*h/L, F-test, P < .001). Performing busulfan TDM on both day 1 and day 2, rather than only on day 1, improves busulfan target exposure attainment in adults undergoing HCT, provided that subsequent TDM is carried out if required., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Limited data on treosulfan pharmacokinetics in adults, particularly regarding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is available to date. Furthermore, correlations between treosulfan exposure, toxicity, and clinical outcome remain understudied. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from 55 AML patients who underwent HDCT with treosulfan (14 g/m 2 ) and melphalan (140 mg/m 2 or 200 mg/m 2 ) (TreoMel) between August 2019 and November 2023 at the University Hospital of Bern. We assessed treosulfan pharmacokinetics and correlations with several physiological parameters with potential impact on its interpatient variability. We further analyzed how treosulfan exposure correlates with toxicity and clinical outcomes. Women above 55 years showed higher area under the curve (AUC) levels (median: 946 mg*h/L, range: 776-1370 mg*h/L), as compared to women under 55 (median: 758 mg*h/L, range: 459-1214 mg*h/L, p = 0.0487). Additionally, women above 55 showed higher peak levels (median: 387 mg/L, range: 308-468 mg/L), as compared to men of the same age range (median: 326 mg/L, range: 264-395 mg/L, p = 0.0159). Treosulfan levels varied significantly with body temperature, liver enzymes, hemoglobin/hematocrit., and treosulfan exposure correlated with diarrhea severity in women over 55 ( p = 0.0076). Our study revealed age- and gender-related variability in treosulfan pharmacokinetics, with higher plasma levels observed in female patients above 55. Moreover, our data suggest that treosulfan plasma levels may vary with several physiological parameters and that higher treosulfan exposure may impact toxicity. Our study underlines the need for further research on treosulfan pharmacokinetics, especially in older patients undergoing HDCT in the ASCT setting.

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: The aims of this study are to report our experience with treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for patients with non-malignant hematologic conditions, correlating clinical outcomes at different time points post-transplant with treosulfan exposure (AUC)., Methods: This study was a single-center observational study investigating overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS) end-points post-transplant. The consequences of treosulfan AUC with respect to toxicity, correction of underlying disease, and long-term chimerism were also explored using pharmacokinetic analysis., Results: Forty-six patients received 49 transplants with treosulfan and fludarabine-based conditioning between 2005 and 2023. Twenty-four patients also received thiotepa. Donor chimerism was assessed on either whole blood or sorted cell lines at different time points post-transplant. Thirty-nine patients received treosulfan pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate cumulative AUC, with five infants receiving real-time assessment to facilitate daily dose adjustment. OS, DFS, and EFS were 87%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Median follow-up was 32.1 months (range 0.82-160 months) following transplant. Lower EFS was associated with patient age (<1 year; p = .057) and lower cumulative treosulfan dose (<42 g/m 2 ; p = .003). Stable donor chimerism in B-cell, NK-cell, and granulocyte lineages at 1-year post-transplant were more prevalent in patients receiving thiotepa conditioning. Two infants required daily dose adjustment to treosulfan to avoid high AUC., Conclusions: Excellent clinical outcomes and stable chimerism were observed in this patient series. The addition of thiotepa conferred no significant toxicity and trended toward sustained ongoing donor engraftment. Correlating treosulfan AUC with long-term patient outcomes is required., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Dose personalization improves patient outcomes for many drugs with a narrow therapeutic index and high inter-individuality variability, including busulfan. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based methods like maximum a posteriori Bayesian (MAP) approaches are two methods routinely used for dose optimization. These approaches vary in how they estimate patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters to inform a dose and the impact of these differences is not well-understood. Using busulfan as an example application and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as a target exposure metric, these estimation methods were compared using retrospective patient data (N = 246) and simulated precision dosing treatment courses. NCA was performed with or without peak extension, and MAP Bayesian estimation was performed using either the one-compartment Shukla model or the two-compartment McCune model. All methods showed good agreement on real-world data (correlation coefficients of 0.945-0.998) as assessed by Bland-Altman plots, although agreement between NCA and MAP methods was higher during the first dosing interval (0.982-0.994) compared to subsequent dosing intervals (0.918-0.938). In dose adjustment simulations, both NCA and MAP estimated high target attainment (> 98%) although true simulated target attainment was lower for NCA (63-66%) versus MAP (91-93%). The largest differences in AUC estimation were due to different assumptions for the shape of the concentration curve during the infusion phase, followed by how the methods considered time-dependent clearance and concentration-time points collected in earlier intervals. In conclusion, although AUC estimates between the two methods showed good correlation, in a simulated study, MAP lead to higher target attainment. When changing from one method to another, or changing infusion duration and other factors, optimum estimated exposure targets may require adjusting to maintain a consistent exposure., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens to prepare patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical due to large inter- and intra-individual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and the risk of adverse consequences of toxicity including hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Busulfan is most commonly measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is not as widely available in clinical laboratories as automated routine clinical chemistry analyzers. The objective was to perform analytical verification of a busulfan immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform., Methods: The MyCare Oncology busulfan immunoassay was configured as a third-party reagent on the Abbott Alinity c. Imprecision, linearity, sample carryover, and onboard stability of reagent studies were evaluated. The performance of the busulfan immunoassay using the Abbott Alinity c was compared to the Beckman Coulter AU480 using sodium heparinized plasma, as well as to LC-MS/MS using lithium heparinized plasma., Results: The imprecision goal of 8% was met, and linearity within the analytical measurement range of 240 to 1700 ng/mL was verified. Sample carryover was negligible, and the reagents were stable onboard for at least 84 days. The busulfan immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS (slope = 0.949, y-intercept = -7.8 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9935) and the Beckman Coulter AU480 (slope = 1.090, y-intercept = -34.5 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9988)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated successful analytical verification of a busulfan third-party immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. The ability to perform TDM of busulfan on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer will positively impact turnaround times to improve patient outcomes., (© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Pediatric patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation undergo regular administration of intravenous busulfan as a conditioning regimen. Once-daily regimen of busulfan has been proposed as a more convenient alternative to the traditional regimen, but it may increase the risk of toxicity such as veno-occlusive disease (VOD). The study aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of once-daily regimens and investigate appropriate intravenous infusion times to reduce the risk of toxicity., Patients and Methods: Once-daily busulfan dosing regimens for pediatric patient were reviewed and selected including EMA- and FDA-based once-daily dosing regimens. We generated busulfan PK data of virtual pediatric patients using a previously developed population PK model. PK profiles and proportion of patients achieving the referenced maximum concentration (Cmax) and exposure to busulfan were used to evaluate the appropriateness of both infusion time and dosing regimens., Results: Predicted PK profiles and exposure of busulfan showed relatively similar distributions for all once-daily dosing regimens. Most patients exceeded the referenced Cmax possibly associated with a high risk of VOD with all once-daily regimens when applied with 3 hours of infusion., Conclusion: While intravenous infusion of once-daily busulfan is typically administered over 3 hours, our findings emphasize the necessity of considering sufficient infusion times to ensure safe drug utilization and prevent toxicity, which will aid in optimal busulfan use in pediatric oncology., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in this work., (© 2024 Kim et al.)

Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan is currently performed by multiple plasma sampling. Saliva is considered a noninvasive therapeutic drug monitoring matrix. This study aimed to investigate intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics (PK) in plasma and saliva, and establish a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for predicting the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity in plasma (AUC 0-∞,p) by using saliva samples. Therefore, the PK of busulfan was studied in 37 Chinese patients. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between the AUC of busulfan in plasma and saliva. LSS models were established by the multiple linear regression analysis. The prediction error, the mean prediction error, and the root mean square error were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy. The agreement between the predicted and observed AUC 0-∞ in saliva was investigated by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy and robustness of the models were evaluated by using the bootstrap procedure. The result of PK analysis 62.2% of patients (23/37) was within the target range of AUC 0-∞,p . A good correlation between saliva and plasma busulfan AUC 0-∞ was observed (r = 0.63, p < .01). The bias and precision of the models 7 and 13 were less than 15%. The intraclass correlation coefficient exceeded 0.9, and the limits of agreement were within ±15%. The 2-point LSS model in saliva is a convenient and desirable approach to predict the AUC 0-∞ of 4 times daily intravenous busulfan in plasma, which can be used to design personalized dosing for busulfan., (© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: The clinical outcomes of busulfan-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been improved by personalizing the doses to target narrow busulfan plasma exposure. An interlaboratory proficiency test program for the quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and busulfan dosing in plasma was developed. Previous proficiency rounds (ie, the first 2) found that 67%-85% and 71%-88% of the dose recommendations were inaccurate, respectively., Methods: A proficiency test scheme was developed by the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories (SKML) and consisted of 2 rounds per year, with each round containing 2 busulfan samples. In this study, 5 subsequent proficiency tests were evaluated. In each round, the participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (ie, low and high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. Descriptive statistics were performed, with ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure. The dose recommendations were deemed accurate., Results: Since January 2020, 41 laboratories have participated in at least 1 round of this proficiency test. Over the 5 rounds, an average of 78% of the busulfan concentrations were accurate. Area under the concentration-time curve calculations were accurate in 75%-80% of the cases, whereas only 60%-69% of the dose recommendations were accurate. Compared with the first 2 proficiency test rounds (PMID 33675302, October, 2021), the busulfan quantitation results were similar, but the dose recommendations worsened. Some laboratories repeatedly submit results that deviated by more than 15% from the reference values., Conclusions: The proficiency test showed persistent inaccuracies in busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations. Additional educational efforts have yet to be implemented; regulatory efforts seem to be needed. The use of specialized busulfan pharmacokinetic laboratories or a sufficient performance in busulfan proficiency tests should be required for HCT centers that prescribe busulfan., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.)

Background: Busulfan (Bu), an alkylating agent commonly used in chemotherapy and transplantation, exhibits high intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability and possible time-dependent variations in clearance, which complicate therapeutic drug monitoring. Numerous analytical methods have been developed to reduce analysis time and facilitate timely decision-making regarding treatment changes; however, the validation procedures rarely involve analysis of potentially interfering excipients. Macrogol 400 (PEG 400) should be considered as a possible interfering agent in the detection of plasma Bu levels, especially as an ionization suppressor., Methods: Six intravenous formulations of Bu were compared with identify at least 1 common excipient (PEG 400). During the 176 therapeutic drug monitoring analyses of Bu, one of the PEG 400 specific mass-to-charge ratio transitions was determined using an instrumental method. After coelution with Bu and its internal standard (Bu-d8) was confirmed, all analyses were repeated using a different experimental setup free of ion suppression induced by PEG. The concentration-time profile of PEG 400 was also analyzed., Results: The area under the curve obtained from the 2 data sets was compared and analyzed using Lin concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot analysis. The results from the 2 analytical methods were comparable: PEG 400 negatively affected the Bu-d8 coefficient of variation but not the Bu/Bu-d8 ratio., Conclusions: The possible interference of PEG 400 should be thoroughly investigated, especially with respect to analytical methods that cannot be supported by correction of the stable isotopically labeled internal standard analog., Competing Interests: The authors declare that this study was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan (Bu) is important to improve outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, standard therapeutic drug monitoring requires multiple samples and is inconvenient, labor-intensive, and costly. Accordingly, a limited sampling strategy (LSS) was evaluated, using 2-point sampling at end of infusion and at 6 hours, and the area-under-the-curve and Bu clearances (CLs) were compared with the results obtained from the standard sampling strategy (SSS) using 5-6 samples., Method: The analysis was based on retrospective clinical data from 202 patients receiving intravenous Bu before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for malignant or nonmalignant conditions. Bu plasma concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the PKCNA package in R program., Result: A total of 502 doses were analyzed by applying SSS and LSS. Using the modified Bland-Altman plot, the mean percentage difference in CL between the SSS and LSS estimates of Bu 6-hourly regimen was -41% (Limits: -53% and -30%). In the once daily regimen, the mean difference in CL between the 2 strategies on the modified Bland-Altman plot was -22% (Limits: -66% and +22%)., Conclusions: The Bu CL values estimated based on the BU concentration at end of infusion and at 6 hours postinfusion were significantly higher than the values obtained via the SSS., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Intravenously infused treosulfan was evaluated in adult and pediatric patients for conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was initially developed on 116 adult and pediatric PK profiles from historical trials, to support treosulfan dose recommendations for children in 2 prospective trials. The aim was to assess and update the initial population PK model by inclusion of additional 83 pediatric PK profiles from these 2 trials. The final population PK model was 2-compartmental with dosing in the central compartment, linear elimination, and inter-compartmental clearance. Inter-individual variability was included on clearance (CL), central volume (V1), peripheral volume (V2), and inter-compartmental clearance (Q). The final model described an effect of the body surface area (BSA) on CL, V1, V2, and Q. The final model resulted in a modified dose recommendation for children and advises treosulfan doses of 10 g/m 2 , 12 g/m 2 , and 14 g/m 2 for BSAs of <0.4 m 2 , ≥0.4 to <0.9 m 2 , and ≥0.9 m 2 , respectively. This simplified BSA-dependent dose recommendation was developed for children, ensuring a well comparable treosulfan exposure as a dose of 14 g/m 2 in adults - irrespective of their age and without applying individual therapeutic drug monitoring., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest XL, JK, AKM, and JB are employees of medac GmbH. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (BU) is currently performed by plasma sampling in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Saliva samples are considered a noninvasive TDM matrix. Currently, no salivary population pharmacokinetics (PopPKs) model for BU available. This study aimed to develop a PopPK model that can describe the relationship between plasma and saliva kinetics in patients receiving intravenous BU. The performance of the model in predicting the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC ss ) based on saliva samples is evaluated. Sixty-six patients with HSCT were recruited and administered 0.8 mg/kg BU intravenously. A PopPK model for saliva and plasma was developed using the nonlinear mixed effects model. Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) optimization was used to estimate the model's predictive performance. Plasma and saliva PKs were adequately described with a one-compartment model and a scaled central compartment. Body surface area correlated positively with both clearance and apparent volume of distribution (Vd), whereas alkaline phosphatase correlated negatively with Vd. Simulations demonstrated that the percentage root mean squared prediction error and lower and upper limits of agreements reduced to 10.02% and -16.96% to 22.86% based on five saliva samples. Saliva can be used as an alternative matrix to plasma in TDM of BU. The AUC ss can be predicted from saliva concentration by Bayesian MAP optimization, which can be used to design personalized dosing for BU., (© 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Busulfan is an alkylating agent used as part of conditioning chemotherapy regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided test-dose strategies have been shown to improve the number of patients achieving busulfan exposure goals and improve clinical outcomes. However, current practices require extensive PK sampling. In this study, PK data were retrospectively collected from busulfan drug monitoring records from adult allo-HCT recipients who received once-daily intravenous busulfan at the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC). A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to identify sources of interindividual variability and evaluate alternative PK sampling strategies. A 2-compartment model, with covariate effects of actual body weight and sex, best described the data. The typical value of clearance for an 83 kg male was estimated to be 11.21 L/h. Fifty-nine percent of allo-HCT recipients were estimated to have met the UNCMC institutional myeloablative conditioning (MAC) exposure goal based on model post hoc estimates of clearance using all PK samples obtained following MAC dosing. Fifty-seven percent of patients were estimated to have met this goal based on post hoc estimates using a single PK sample. Our results indicate once-daily, intravenous busulfan PK in adult allo-HCT recipients receiving MAC dosing can be reasonably described by a popPK model, and the use of a sparse PK sampling strategy may be feasible for determining target exposure attainment following MAC dosing. Use of a popPK model and sparse PK sampling strategy to carry out busulfan test-dose procedures could reduce health care costs and inconvenience to patients., (© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Purpose: This study aimed to establish an optimal model to predict the busulfan (BU) area under the curve at steady state (AUC ss ) by using machine learning (ML)., Patients and Methods: Seventy-nine adult patients (age ≥18 years) who received BU intravenously and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring from 2013 to 2021 at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. The whole dataset was divided into a training group and test group at the ratio of 8:2. BU AUC ss were considered as the target variable. Nine different ML algorithms and one population pharmacokinetic (pop PK) model were developed and validated, and their predictive performance was compared., Results: All ML models were superior to the pop PK model (R2 = 0.751, MSE = 0.722, 14 and RMSE = 0.830) in model fitting and had better predictive accuracy. The ML model of BU AUC ss established through support vector regression (SVR) and gradient boosted regression trees (GBRT) had the best predictive ability (R 2  = 0.953 and 0.953, MSE = 0.323 and 0.326, and RMSE = 0.423 and 0.425)., Conclusion: All the ML models can potentially be used to estimate BU AUC ss with the aim of facilitating rational use of BU on the individualized level, especially models built by SVR and GBRT algorithms.

Busulfan (Bu) combined with cyclophosphamide (Cy) is commonly used as a myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). There is inter-individual variability of Bu pharmacokinetics (PK) and hence in toxicity and efficacy. The introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu has decreased toxicity of the regimen. Hepatic metabolism of Bu is mediated through Glutathione-S-Transferases (GSTs), mainly GSTA1. Patients with GSTA1*A variants are considered normal metabolizers and GSTA1*B corresponds to poor metabolism, defined by nucleotide changes at -52 or -69 locus in GSTA1 promoter region. The aim of the study was to explore the correlation between GSTA1 polymorphisms and Bu-PK in 60 adult patients receiving an allo-HCT in the BuCyBu clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov I, ID NCT01779882) comparing the sequence BuCy to CyBu. DNA samples prior to conditioning were genotyped for candidate variants at -52 (rs3957356) and -69 (rs3957357) loci in the GSTA1 promoter. Thirty-three % of patients were GSTA1*A*A, 49% GSTA1*A*B and 18% GSTA1*B*B. In GSTA1*A*A patients, median Bu-AUC was 3.6 ± 0.7 mg*h/L, in GSTA1*A*B 4.5 ± 1.6 and in GSTA1*B*B 4.9 ± 1.4 (AUC 35% higher than GSTA1*A*A, p = 0.03), with a similar significant correlation with Bu-clearance (p = 0.04). The correlation between GSTA1 polymorphism and AUC remained significant in multivariate linear regression analysis. There was a trend for lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients with low AUC. We could not demonstrate a correlation between GSTA1 polymorphisms and NRM, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) in this small cohort, but there is a trend of higher aGvHD incidence in GSTA1*B*B patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aim: To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous treosulfan in paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for a broad range of diseases and to explore the impact of different dosing regimens on treosulfan exposure (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC 0→∞ ) through dosing simulations., Methods: A prospective multicentre PK study was conducted using treosulfan concentration data (n = 423) collected from 53 children (median age 3.5, range 0.2-17.0 years) receiving three daily age-guided doses (10-14 g/m 2 ). Population PK modelling was performed using NONMEM software, utilising a stepwise forward selection backward elimination method and likelihood-ratio test for screening covariates to describe PK variability. Monte Carlo simulation was used to generate patient PK data for 10 000 virtual paediatric patients and cumulative AUC 0→∞ values were evaluated using age, body surface area (BSA) and model-based dosing regimens, targeting 4800 mg*h/L., Results: Treosulfan concentration data were described using a one-compartment PK model with first-order elimination. Population mean (95% CI) estimates for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were 16.3 (14.9-18.1) L/h and 41.9 (38.8-45.1) L, respectively. Allometrically scaled body weight was the best covariate descriptor for CL and V, and maturational age further explained variability in CL. Dosing simulations indicated that in young patient groups (<2 years), a model-based dosing regimen more accurately achieved the target AUC 0→∞ (58.3%) over the age (42.6%) and BSA-based (51.3%) regimens., Conclusion: Treosulfan disposition was described through allometric body weight and maturational age descriptors. Model-informed dosing is recommended for patients under 2 years. Treosulfan PK parameters and AUC 0→∞ were not influenced by patient disease., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Introduction: Busulfan is an alkylating agent widely used in the conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation possessing a complex metabolism and a large interindividual and intra-individual variability, especially in children. Combined with the strong rationale of busulfan PK/PD relationships, factors altering its clearance (e.g. weight, age, and GST-A genetic polymorphism mainly) can also affect clinical outcomes., Areas Covered: This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on busulfan pharmacokinetics, its pharmacokinetics variabilities in pediatric populations, drug-drug interactions (DDI), and their consequences regarding dose individualization. This review was based on medical literature up until October 2021., Expert Opinion: To ensure effective busulfan exposure in pediatrics, different weight-based nomograms have been established to determine busulfan dosage and provided improved results (65-80% of patients correctly exposed). In addition to nomograms, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan measuring plasmatic concentrations to estimate busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters can be used. TDM is now widely carried out in routine practices and aims to ensure the targeting of the reported therapeutic windows by individualizing busulfan dosing based on the clearance estimations from a previous dose.

Background: Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating drug used in many preparative regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is conjugated in the liver mainly by glutathione S-transferase isoenzyme A1-1 ( GSTA1 ). Genetic polymorphisms in these isoenzymes may affect the pharmacokinetics of Bu and the clinical outcomes of HSCT. This study aimed to assess the impact of glutathione S-transferase ( GST ) genetic polymorphisms on the clearance of Bu and the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing HSCT., Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who received IV Bu before HSCT at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Oman from January 2003 to October 2016. Genotyping for polymorphisms was performed for GSTM1 , GSTT1 , GSTA1 , and GSTP1 . Each GST polymorphism was analyzed for its impact on Bu clearance and HSCT outcomes., Results: A total of 135 patients were included. The mean Bu clearance was 3.7 ± 0.98 mL/min/kg. Patients with GSTA1 A-513G heterozygosity (AG) were found to have a higher incidence of graft loss ( P = 0.006). Homozygous double null of GSTM1 and GSTT1 was associated with a higher incidence of acute graft versus host disease ( P = 0.04). Double non-null GSTM1 and GSTT1 and non-null GSTM1 increased the risk of mortality ( P = 0.034 and 0.021, respectively)., Conclusions: GST genotyping before HSCT may predict HSCT outcomes. The results of this preliminary retrospective study need to be confirmed in a larger prospective study., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of busulfan focusing on how busulfan clearance (CL) changes over time during once-daily administration and assess different methods for measuring busulfan exposure and the ability to achieve target cumulative exposure under different dosing adjustment scenarios in pediatric stem cell transplantation recipients. Daily serial blood sampling was performed and concentration-time data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach. The developed PK model was used to assess achievement of target exposure under six dose-adjustment scenarios based on simulations performed in RStudio (RxODE package)®. A total of 2491 busulfan plasma concentration-time measurements were collected from 95 patients characterizing 379 dosing days. A two-compartment model with time-associated CL best described the data with a typical CL of 14.5 L/h for an adult male with 62 kg normal fat mass (NFM; equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), typical volume of distribution central compartment (V1) of 40.6 L/59 kg NFM (equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), and typical volume of distribution peripheral compartment of 3.57 L/62 kg NFM. Model interindividual variability in CL and V1 was 14.7% and 34.9%, respectively, and interoccasional variability in CL was 6.6%. Patient size described by NFM, a maturation component, and time since start of treatment significantly influenced CL. Simulations demonstrated that using model-based exposure estimates with each dose, and either a proportional dose-adjustment calculation or model-based calculated individual CL estimates to support dose adjustments, increased proportion of subjects attaining cumulative exposure within 5% of target compared with using noncompartmental analysis (100% vs. 0%). A time-associated reduction in CL during once-daily busulfan treatment was described., (© 2022 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Abstract: We prospectively compared outcomes after a fludarabine (Flu) plus oral busulfan (Bu)–containing reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (150 mg/m2 Flu and 10 mg/kg oral Bu), with (n = 32; Flu-TBu group) or without (n = 30; Flu-Bu group) therapeutic dose monitoring and dose adjustment of Bu. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells from a genoidentical sibling, and study cohorts had similar patient characteristics. Dose adjustments of Bu were required in 20 (63%) patients in the Flu-TBu group (median final dose, 8.89 mg/kg; range, 6.3–13.34 mg/kg). Donor T-cell and granulocyte engraftments were similar, and early conditioning-related toxicities were mild and similar in both study groups. With a median follow-up of 45 months (51 months in the 37 survivors), posttransplantation outcomes did not differ between cohorts. The strongest predictor of 2-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival was the presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (77% versus 34% for overall survival and 74% versus 34% for leukemia-free survival; P &#60; .001 for both outcomes). In conclusion, therapeutic dose monitoring of oral Bu in a reduced-intensity conditioning setting does not seem to affect outcome, although further studies may identify very-high-risk patients who benefit from this strategy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We have analyzed the plasma pharmacokinetics of busulfan in 272 patients receiving high-dose oral busulfan and intravenous cyclophosphamide in conjunction with allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation. The patients ranged in age from 2 months to 59 yr (mean 10, median 12 yr) and had the following diagnoses: thalassemia or sickle cell anemia (n = 74); leukemia or myelodysplasia (n = 112); inborn errors of metabolism (n = 41) or immunodeficiency (n = 45). Plasma specimens were collected following the first dose for each patient which ranged from 1 to 4 mg/kg (mean ± SD, 1.21 ± 0.41, median 1.15). Busulfan was quantitated using ultraviolet absorbance detection after derivatization and HPLC separation. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by modeling the raw data to fit first-order single compartment kinetics. The kinetic parameters showed wide interpatient variability independent of age and diagnosis. There was a statistically significant correlation of age with the following parameters: area under the curve (AUC); maximal concentration; minimum concentration; clearance; volume of distribution and absorption half-time. The coefficients of determination (i.e. correlation coefficient squared) were low ranging from 0.04 to 0.12 implying only a small part (i.e. 4–12%) of the variance was explained by age. Although busulfan pharmacokinetics are age-related most of the variability is not explained by age or diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The study objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for busulfan to comprehensively examine drug-drug interactions in paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, there is limited evidence to substantiate potential drug-drug interactions with busulfan., Methods: This retrospective study population was comprised of 250 patients receiving, on average, 0.8 mg/kg intravenous busulfan as pretreatment. All model analyses were conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modelling in Pumas v2.0. The metabolic pathways of primary interest were glutathione conjugation and cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity. Concomitant medications were categorized as CYP inhibitors, inducers or glutathione S-transferase depleters, and included in the model as conditional covariates. A bootstrap simulation and visual predictive check were conducted to qualify the final model., Results: The final 1-compartment model incorporates covariates of weight and age in relation to their effects on both total body clearance and volume of distribution. The estimated typical values of clearance and volume were 1.138 L/h (CI: 1.095-1.179 L/h) and 3.527 L (CI: 3.418-3.621 L), respectively. No significant changes in clearance were observed when medications that alter proposed hepatic and metabolic pathways of busulfan were coadministered., Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single centre study of busulfan in children and the first to quantify the maturation effect of both clearance and volume. This study could not demonstrate a difference in busulfan clearance when comparing patients who received medications that alter the glutathione S-transferase, CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 pathway to those who did not., (© 2021 British Pharmacological Society.)

Busulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is widely used before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. As of 2020, there is no population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for busulfan in Chinese pediatric patients. A systemic external evaluation of 11 published popPK models was conducted in Chinese pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. Forty pediatric patients were enrolled in this study, with a total of 183 blood concentrations. The relative prediction error (PE%), median PE%, median absolute PE%, and percentage of PE% within ±20% and ±30% were calculated in prediction-based diagnostics. Simulation-based diagnostics were conducted through a prediction- and variability-corrected visual predictive check and the normalized prediction distribution error. The relative individual prediction error was calculated using Bayesian forecasting with 1 to 3 concentration points. The 1-compartment open linear popPK model, which was built by Su-jin Rhee et al (model H), incorporating the patient's body surface area, age, dosing day, and aspartate aminotransferase as significant covariates had preferable predictability than other popPK models. In prediction-based diagnostics, the median PE%, percentage of PE% within ±20%, and percentage of PE% within ±30% of model H were 8.48%, 45.35%, and 59.56%, respectively. The normalized prediction distribution error of model H showed that it followed the normal distribution. Based on Bayesian forecasting, model H showed good predictive performance. Thus, model H was the most appropriate model that can be used clinically for individualized dosage adjustments in Chinese pediatric HSCT patients., (© 2021, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose busulfan (Bu) administration and pharmacokinetically (PK) guided adjustment of Bu dose for patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies were compared using a systematic review and meta-analysis. A Markov model was used in estimating relevant cost and health outcomes from the perspective of the health system. The primary outcomes of interest were lifetime cost, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in dollar per QALY gained. Results showed that progression-free survival and overall survival in the PK-guided group were higher than that in the fixed-dose group, and the PK-guided group was associated with low non-relapse mortality and relapse rate. In contrast to safety, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was the same in the two groups (P > 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the QALY of the PK-guided group (12.8135 QALYs and $582,475.07) increased by 2.0609 relative to that in the fixed-dose group (10.7526 QALYs and $562,833.20), and the ICER was $9530.72/QALY. One-way and probability sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of the results. In conclusion, the PK-guided approach has higher efficacy and is safer., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Acute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) grades 2-4 occurs in 15-60% of pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The collateral damage to normal tissue by conditioning regimens administered prior to allo-HSCT serve as an initial trigger for aGvHD. DNA-repair mechanisms may play an important role in mitigating this initial damage, and so the variants in corresponding DNA-repair protein-coding genes via affecting their quantity and/or function. We explored 51 variants within 17 DNA-repair genes for their association with aGvHD grades 2-4 in 60 pediatric patients. The cumulative incidence of aGvHD 2-4 was 12% (n = 7) in the exploratory cohort. MGMT rs10764881 (G>A) and EXO rs9350 (c.2270C>T) variants were associated with aGvHD 2-4 [Odds ratios = 14.8 (0 events out of 40 in rs10764881 GG group) and 11.5 (95% CI: 2.3-191.8), respectively, multiple testing corrected p ≤ 0.001]. Upon evaluation in an extended cohort (n = 182) with an incidence of aGvHD 2-4 of 22% (n = 40), only MGMT rs10764881 (G>A) remained significant (adjusted HR = 2.05 [95% CI: 1.06-3.94]; p = 0.03) in the presence of other clinical risk factors. Higher MGMT expression was seen in GG carriers for rs10764881 and was associated with higher IC50 of Busulfan in lymphoblastoid cells. MGMT rs10764881 carrier status could predict aGvHD occurrence in pediatric patients undergoing allo-HSCT., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The efficacy of pharmacokinetically (PK) guided, once-daily administration of busulfan (BU) was evaluated in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Twenty-one patients (median age 61) received 30 mg/m 2 fludarabine for 6 days and BU for 4 days, starting from 3.2 mg/m 2 and subsequently adjusted to the target area under the curve (AUC) of 6000 µmol-min/L. The median AUC of day 1 (AUC1), AUC4, and their average were 4871.3, 6021.0, and 5368.1 µmol-min/L, respectively. Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) occurred in five patients (24%) but all recovered well. Four patients (20%) had non-infectious pulmonary complications (NIPCs). Patients with high AUC1 had frequent gastrointestinal adverse events, but similar incidence of VOD/SOS and NIPCs. Two-year overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse rates were 44.4%, 28.6%, and 29.1%, respectively. Patients with high AUC1 had significantly high NRM (57.1% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.04) and inferior OS (14.3% vs. 60.1%, P = 0.002), while patients with high AUC4 had a significantly low relapse rate (8.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, once-daily BU and a PK-guided dose intensification were beneficial for reducing relapse in elderly patients with AML/MDS. However, caution should be exercised as rapid BU dose elevation may contribute to NRM., (© 2021. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

Background: Inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion times is a potential source of error in personalizing busulfan doses using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Planned times rather than the actual times for sampling and infusion time are often documented. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of a limited sampling TDM of busulfan with regard to inaccurate documentation., Methods: A pharmacometric analysis was conducted in NONMEM® 7.4.3 and "R" by performing stochastic simulation and estimation with four, two and one sample(s) per patient on the basis of a one-compartment- (1CMT) and two-compartment (2CMT) population pharmacokinetic model. The dosing regimens consisted of i.v. busulfan (0.8 mg/kg) every 6 h (Q6H) or 3.2 mg/kg every 24 h (Q24H) with a 2 h- and 3 h infusion time, respectively. The relative prediction error (rPE) and relative root-mean-square error (rRmse) were calculated in order to determine the accuracy and precision of the individual AUC estimation., Results: A noticeable impact on the estimated AUC based on a 1CMT-model was only observed if uncertain documentation reached ± 30 min (1.60% for Q24H and 2.19% for Q6H). Calculated rPEs and rRmse for Q6H indicate a slightly lower level of accuracy and precision when compared to Q24H. Spread of rPE's and rRmse for the 2CMT-model were wider and higher compared to estimations based on a 1CMT-model., Conclusions: The estimated AUC was not affected substantially by inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion time. The calculated rPEs and rRmses of estimated AUC indicate robustness and reliability for TDM of busulfan, even in presence of erroneous records., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Personalizing busulfan doses to target a narrow plasma exposure has improved the efficacy and lowered the toxicity of busulfan-based conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic cell transplant. Regional regulations guide interlaboratory proficiency testing for busulfan concentration quantification and monitoring. To date, there have been no comparisons of the busulfan pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendation protocols used in these laboratories. Here, in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, a novel interlaboratory proficiency program for the quantitation in plasma, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing of busulfan was designed. The methods and results of the first 2 rounds of this proficiency testing are described herein., Methods: A novel method was developed to stabilize busulfan in N,N-dimethylacetamide, which allowed shipping of the proficiency samples without dry ice. In each round, participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (one low and one high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. All participants were blinded to the answers; descriptive statistics were used to evaluate their overall performance. The guidelines suggested that answers within ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure and dose recommendation were to be considered accurate., Results: Of the 4 proficiency samples evaluated, between 67% and 85% of the busulfan quantitation results were accurate (ie, within 85%-115% of the reference value). The majority (88% round #1; 71% round #2) of the dose recommendation answers were correct., Conclusions: A proficiency testing program by which laboratories are alerted to inaccuracies in their quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations for busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients was developed. These rounds of proficiency testing suggests that additional educational efforts and proficiency rounds are needed to ensure appropriate busulfan dosing., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To apply therapeutic drug monitoring and dose-individualization of intravenous Busulfan to paediatric patients and evaluate the impact of syringe-pump induced Busulfan infusion lag-time after in vitro estimation., Methods: 76 children and adolescents were administered 2 h intravenous Busulfan infusion every 6 h (16 doses). Busulfan plasma levels, withdrawn by an optimized sampling scheme and measured by a validated HPLC-PDA method, were used to estimate basic PK parameters, AUC, Cmax, kel, t1/2, applying Non-Compartmental Analysis. In vivo infusion lag-time was simulated in vitro and used to evaluate its impact on AUC estimation., Key Findings: Mean (%CV) Busulfan AUC, Cmax, clearance and t1/2 for pediatric population were found 962.3 μm × min (33.1), 0.95 mg/L (41.4), 0.27 L/h/kg (33.3), 2.2 h (27.8), respectively. TDM applied to 76 children revealed 6 (7.9%) being above and 25 (32.9%) below therapeutic-range (AUC: 900-1350 μm × min). After dose correction, all patients were measured below toxic levels (AUC < 1500 μm × min), no patient below 900 μm × min. Incorporation of infusion lag-time revealed lower AUCs with 17.1% more patients and 23.1% more younger patients, with body weight <16 kg, being below the therapeutic-range., Conclusions: TDM, applied successfully to 76 children, confirmed the need for Busulfan dose-individualization in paediatric patients. Infusion lag-time was proved clinically significant for younger, low body-weight patients and those close to the lower therapeutic-range limit., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Busulfan (Bu) is a common component of conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is known for high interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a multicentric, population PK (PopPK) model for intravenous Bu in pediatric patients before HSCT to first study the influence of glutathione-s-transferase A1 (GSTA1) polymorphisms on Bu's PK in a large multicentric pediatric population while accounting for fludarabine (Flu) coadministration and, second, to establish an individualized, model-based, first-dose recommendation for intravenous Bu that can be widely used in pediatric patients. The model was built using data from 302 patients from five transplantation centers who received a Bu-based conditioning regimen. External model validation used data from 100 patients. The relationship between body weight and Bu clearance (CL) was best described by an age-dependent allometric scaling of a body weight model. A stepwise covariate analysis identified Day 1 of Bu conditioning, GSTA1 metabolic groups based on GSTA1 polymorphisms, and Flu coadministration as significant covariates influencing Bu CL. The final model adequately predicted Bu first-dose CL in the external cohort, with 81% of predicted area under the curves within the therapeutic window. The final model showed minimal bias (mean prediction error, -0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1% to 2.0%) and acceptable precision (mean absolute prediction error percentage, 18.7%; 95% CI, 17.0%-20.5%) in Bu CL prediction for dosing. This multicentric PopPK study confirmed the influence of GSTA1 polymorphisms and Flu coadministration on Bu CL. The developed model accurately predicted Bu CL and first doses in an external cohort of pediatric patients., (© 2021 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aim: To assess the ability of model-based personalised dosing tools to estimate busulfan exposure (i) in comparison to clinically used intensive sampling exposure estimation procedure, (ii) using limited sampling strategies and (iii) to predict changes in busulfan clearance during busulfan treatment., Methods: Data on intravenous busulfan dosing for patients with 4 consecutive days were entered into Bayesian forecasting software, InsightRX and NextDose. Prediction of busulfan cumulative exposure was compared to current clinical practice estimation, aiming for pre-defined individualised target of cumulative exposure. Estimation performance was tested given several limited sampling strategies., Results: Thirty-two paediatric patients (0.2-16.5 years) provided a total of 103 daily exposure measurements estimated using 7 samples taken per day (full sampling), with 19 patients having sampling following all doses administered. Both software tools utilising Bayesian methods provided acceptable relative bias and precision of cumulative exposure estimations under the tested sampling scenarios. Relative bias ranged from median RE of 0.1-14.6% using InsightRX and from 3.4-7.8% using NextDose. Precision ranged from median RMSE of 0.19-0.32 mg·h·L -1 for InsightRX and 0.08-0.1 mg·h·L -1 for NextDose. A median reduction in busulfan clearance from day 1 to day 4 was observed in the clinical data (-10.9%), when using InsightRX (-18.6%) and with NextDose (-14.7%)., Conclusion: Bayesian methods were shown to have relatively low bias and precisely estimate busulfan exposure using intensive sampling and several limited sampling strategies, which provides evidence for prospective studies to evaluate these tools in clinical practice. A trend to overestimation of exposure using Bayesian methods was observed compared to clinical practice. Reduction of busulfan clearance from day 1 to 4 of once daily dosing was confirmed and should be considered when adjusting doses., (© 2021. Crown.)

In busulfan-based conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children, accurate a priori determination of the first dose is important because of its narrow therapeutic window. Sickle cell disease (SCD) influences pharmacokinetics of the commonly used drugs by affecting organs responsible for drug metabolism and elimination. This pharmacokinetics study assesses the influence of SCD on the metabolic pathway of busulfan that is mainly metabolized in the liver. In this retrospective cross-sectional case-control study, 16 patients with SCD were matched to 50 patients without SCD on known busulfan clearance's covariates (glutathione-S-transferase alpha1 polymorphisms, age, weight). Clearance of the first dose of busulfan was not significantly different independently of genetic or anthropometric factors in patients with or without SCD., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan is important to prevent adverse events and improve outcomes in stem cell transplantation. We investigated intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics and evaluated the utility of limited sampling strategy (LSS) as a simple method to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)., Procedure: The study comprised 87 busulfan measurements in 54 children who received intravenous busulfan between August 2015 and May 2020. AUCs were calculated from three to five blood sampling points in each patient, and the correlation between AUC and plasma concentrations (ng/mL) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after initiating busulfan infusion (C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , C 4 , and C 6 , respectively)., Results: By one-point sampling strategy, the most relevant predicted AUC was based on C 6 (r 2  = 0.789; precision, 11.0%) in all patients. The predicted AUC based on C 6 was acceptable (r 2  = 0.937; precision, 5.9%) for adolescent patients weighing >23 kg, but the correlation was poor in infants and young children weighing ≤ 23 kg (r 2  = 0.782; precision, 11.4%). By two-point sampling strategy, the predicted AUC based on C 3 and C 6 showed the most relevant concentrations (r 2  = 0.943; precision, 6.4%), even in infants and young children, whereas the predicted AUC based on C 3 and C 6 was acceptable (r 2  = 0.963; precision, 5.7%)., Conclusions: The AUC of busulfan can be predicted based on C 6 in adolescent patients. However, there was substantial interindividual variation in busulfan pharmacokinetics in infants and young children, in whom two-point LSS was necessary for accurate AUC prediction., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using fludarabine (Flu)-based reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with busulfan (BU) or melphalan (Mel) for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed transplant outcome, including engraftment, chimerism, immune reconstitution, and complications in 15 patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and 27 patients with non-SCID PID. The patients underwent Flu-based RIC-HCT with BU (FluBU: 7 SCID, 16 non-SCID) or Mel (FluMel: 8 SCID, 11 non-SCID). The targeted low-dose BU with therapeutic drug monitoring was set to 30 mg hour/L for SCID., Results: The 2-year overall survival of all patients was 79.6% and that of patients with SCID in the FluBU and FluMel groups was 100% and 62.5%, respectively. In the FluBU group, all seven patients achieved engraftment, good immune reconstitution, and long-term survival. All five patients receiving umbilical cord blood transplantation achieved complete or high-level mixed chimerism and sufficient specific IgG production. In the FluMel group, six of eight patients achieved complete or high-level mixed chimerism. Viral reactivation or new viral infection occurred in one FluBU group patient and four FluMel group patients. In the non-SCID group, 10 of 11 patients (91%) who received FluMel achieved complete or high-level mixed chimerism but had variable outcomes. Patients with WAS (2/2 patients), NEMO deficiency (2/2 patients), and X-linked hyper IgM syndrome (2/3 patients) who received FluBU achieved complete or high-level mixed chimerism and long-term survival., Conclusions: RIC-HCT with FluBU is a safe and effective strategy for obtaining high-level donor chimerism, immune reconstitution including B cell function, and long-term survival in patients with SCID. In patients with non-SCID PID, the results varied according to the subtype of the disease. Further prospective studies are required to optimize the conditioning regimen for non-SCID PID.

Background: Busulfan (BU) is an alkylating agent with a narrow therapeutic index and high intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability used in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring BU exposure during high-dose conditioning regimens is recommended and positively impacts outcomes. We aimed to develop, validate, and apply a ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assay to measure BU concentrations in oral fluid and dried plasma spots (DPS) as alternative matrices to plasma., Methods: We prepared plasma and oral fluid samples by protein precipitation and DPS after liquid extraction. We analyzed extracts using an LC-MS/MS system with an Acquity HSS T3 column in the positive electrospray ionization mode. The method was validated and applied to 79 paired plasma and oral fluid samples from 7 patients on BU conditioning treatment. DPS were prepared by pipetting plasma onto Whatman 903 paper. The correlation between BU in plasma, oral fluid, and DPS samples was evaluated., Results: Run time was 4.0 minutes. The assay was linear at 50-5000 ng mL-1 (r > 0.99), precise (1.9%-5.3% oral fluid and 1.8%-5.9% DPS), and accurate (98.1%-108.9% oral fluid and 93%-103.1% DPS). BU was stable in DPS at 23°C for 24 hours. BU levels in oral fluid (r = 0.927) and DPS (r = 0.982) were significantly correlated with plasma. Despite the good correlation, we found a wide variation between oral fluid and plasma levels. The area under curves (AUCs) calculated with oral fluid concentrations were 79.1%-167.1% of plasma AUCs. Bland-Altman plots found a better agreement for DPS, with AUCs estimated from corrected DPS levels at 83.1%-114.1% of plasma values., Conclusions: We developed and validated a simple and fast ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS assay to measure BU in oral fluid and DPS. The results do not support the use of oral fluid as a matrix for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of BU. The AUC estimated from BU measurements in DPS was comparable to that in plasma, supporting the use of DPS in BU therapeutic drug monitoring as an alternative matrix, with adequate short-term stability and logistic advantages., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to predict the presence and mechanism of busulfan drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using pharmacokinetic interaction (PKI) network-based molecular structure similarity and network pharmacology., Methods: Logistic function models were established to predict busulfan DDIs based on the assumption that an approved drug tends to interact with the drug used in HSCT (DH) if structurally similar to the drugs in the PKI network of the DH. The PKI network of the DH represented the association between drugs and the proteins related to the PK of the DH. The most appropriate model was applied to predict busulfan DDIs in HSCT. Candidate targets for busulfan DDIs and their interacting were identified by network pharmacology., Results: Six of the top ten predicted busulfan DDIs were clinically relevant and involved voriconazole, fludarabine, itraconazole, cyclophosphamide, metronidazole, and melphalan. Candidate targets for these DDIs were CYP450s (3A4, 2B6, 2C9, and 2C19), GSTs (GSTA1, GSTP1, GSTT1, and GSTM1), and ABC transporters (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3), in the targets of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The networks of interacting proteins and candidate targets indicated the regulatory potential of pregnane X receptor (PXR), as a nuclear receptor. Enrichment analysis showed the metabolism of drugs and xenobiotics, glutathione metabolism, and bile secretion associated with busulfan DDIs and DILI., Conclusions: This study has successfully predicted busulfan DDIs in HSCT through PKI-based molecular structure similarity. The mechanism of busulfan DDI and DILI was attributed mostly to CYP450s, GSTs, and ABC transporters, and PXR was identified as a potential target.

We aimed to review the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous busulfan in paediatric patients, identify covariate factors influencing exposure, investigate evidence of changes in PK behaviour over time, and correlate exposure with efficacy and toxicity outcomes. A literature review was undertaken of original research published between 2007 and 2019, investigating the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of intravenous busulfan in patients ≤ 18 years of age. The review identified 41 publications characterising the PK, and 45 publications describing the PD, of busulfan. Median typical clearance (CL) was 0.22 L/h/kg and median typical volume of distribution was 0.69 L/kg. Patient weight, age, glutathione-S-transferase A1 (GSTA1) genotype and busulfan dosing day/time were the most commonly identified factors affecting CL. Of nine studies investigating changes in CL, seven reported reduced CL over the 4-day course of treatment. Exposure monitoring methods and therapeutic targets were heterogeneous across studies. Relationships between busulfan exposure and patient outcomes were observed in five studies. One study observed a cumulative area under the concentration-time curve over all days of treatment of between 78 and 101 mg/L·h, and two studies observed an average concentration at first dose of < 600 ng/mL improved overall survival, transplant-related mortality, or relapse. One study observed increased sinusoidal obstructive syndrome with maximum busulfan concentration > 1.88 ng/mL. Patient weight, age and GSTA1 genotype are important covariates to consider when individualising busulfan therapy. Reduced busulfan CL over time may need to be accounted for, particularly in patients not receiving phenytoin co-therapy. Standardised monitoring of busulfan exposure over the entire course of treatment and further investigation of the role of busulfan metabolites and pharmacogenomics is warranted.

Busulfan (Bu) has been used in combination with fludarabine (Flu; BuFlu) or cyclophosphamide (Cy; BuCy) as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This multi-institutional prospective study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Bu between BuFlu and BuCy. Plasma Bu concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at the first dose of the first and fourth days of intravenous Bu administrations (total of 16 doses of 0.8 mg/kg). Thirty-seven patients were evaluable (BuFlu, N = 18; BuCy, N = 19). The median age was significantly higher in BuFlu. In BuFlu, the median area under the blood concentration-time curve of Bu on the fourth day was 1183 μmol min/L (range 808-1509), which was significantly higher than that on the first day [1095 μmol min/L (range 822-1453), P < 0.01]. In contrast, such differences were not observed in BuCy. Consistently, there was a significant decrease in the clearance of Bu on the fourth day as compared with the first day in BuFlu. These results suggest that the PK of Bu was altered during the co-administration of Flu, which was not the case with Cy. A large-scale study is required to evaluate the significance of the differences in the PK of Bu between the conditionings on HSCT outcomes.

Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to determine a cutoff value for safety for the AUC for busulfan plasma levels in patients undergoing HSCT. A total of 149 consecutive HSCT patients were studied. After an oral test dose of busulfan, we set target doses of 4000, 5000, or 6000 µMol⸱min/day, and analyzed the AUC of oral or intravenous Bu. These patients were compared with 53 historical control subjects who had received myeloablative conditioning regimen without busulfan pharmacokinetic monitoring. Using a test dose and the administration route had no impact on the sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) incidence, transplant-related mortality or 1-year overall survival. However, patients receiving busulfan at doses set up at AUC > 5000 had an increased risk to develop SOS after HSCT (hazard ratio 3.39, p = 0.034, 95% CI 1.09-10.52). Adjusting the busulfan dose according to SE levels target dose during conditioning is associated with lower rates of oral severe mucositis and SOS. A cutoff of 5000 µMol⸱min is safe and does not impair survival., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Efficacy of treosulfan, used in the treatment of marrow disorders, depends on the activity of its monoepoxy-(EBDM) and diepoxy compounds. The study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of treosulfan and EBDM in the rat plasma and brain by means of mixed-effects modelling., Methods: The study had a one-animal-per-sample design and included ninty-six 10-week-old Wistar rats of both sexes. Treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in the brain and plasma were measured by an HPLC-MS/MS method. The population pharmacokinetic model was established in NONMEM software with a first-order estimation method with interaction., Results: One-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described changes in the concentrations of treosulfan in plasma, and EBDM concentrations in plasma and in the brain. Treosulfan concentrations in the brain followed a two-compartment model. Both treosulfan and EBDM poorly penetrated the blood-brain barrier (ratio of influx and efflux clearances through the blood-brain barrier was 0.120 and 0.317 for treosulfan and EBDM, respectively). Treosulfan plasma clearance was significantly lower in male rats than in females (0.273 L/h/kg vs 0.419 L/h/kg)., Conclusions: The developed population pharmacokinetic model is the first that allows the prediction of treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in rat plasma and brain. These results provide directions for future studies on treosulfan regarding the contribution of transport proteins or the development of a physiological-based model.

Background: Busulfan (Bu) is the cornerstone of conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, widely used in both adults and children for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite an intravenous formulation, interindividual variability (IIV) remains high and optimal exposure difficult to achieve, especially in neonates and infants., Procedure: To ensure both efficacy and safety, we set up in 2005 an observational study designed for children not fully assessed during the drug registration procedure. From a large cohort of 540 patients, we developed a Bu population pharmacokinetic model based on body weight (BW) and maturation concepts to reduce IIV and optimize exposure. A new dosing nomogram was evaluated to better fit the population pharmacokinetic model., Results: Bu clearance IIV was significantly decreased from 61.3% (covariate-free model) to 28.6% when combining BW and maturation function. Median Bu area under the curve (AUC) was 1179 µmol/L × min compared to 1025 with the EMA dosing nomogram for children <9 kg. The target AUC was reached for each BW strata, significantly increasing the percentages of patients achieving reaching the targeted AUC as compared to FDA schedule., Conclusion: This new model made it possible to propose a novel dosing nomogram that better considered children below 16 kg of BW and allowed better initial exposure as compared to existing dosing schedules. This nomogram, which would be easy to use to determine an optimal dosing schedule in daily practice, will need to be validated in clinical routine. Therapeutic drug monitoring remains strongly advisable for small children and those with specific diseases., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative detection of busulfan (BU) in children's hemolytic samples by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was established. In this study, the sample preparation procedure involved a one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile (ACN) solution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method used Hypersil GOLD C 18 . The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) and ACN with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring modes were used for quantitative analysis and the ion pairs of BU and BU-d8 were m/z 263.9 → 150.9 and 272.0 → 159.0, respectively. BU had a good linearity in the range of 0.01-10 μg mL -1 . The intra- and inter-day relative error was between -7.21% and 8.26%, and the coefficient of variation was less than 12.64%. The average extraction recovery rate in plasma samples was 99.76% ± 6.53%, and the matrix in normal plasma and hemolyzed plasma had no significant effect on the detection results. Normal and hemolytic samples could maintain good stability at 4, 25 and -40°C. As a result, this method is particularly suitable for determining BU in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and this study provides the methodological basis for further research on the pharmacokinetics of BU in children with HSCT., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is necessary to better achieve the target exposure in children before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, TDM-based dosing may be challenging if intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability (also denoted inter-occasion variability [IOV]) occurs during therapy., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe and quantify busulfan IOV in children, and to investigate its potential determinants., Methods: We performed a new analysis of published data from children who received intravenous busulfan over 4 days before HSCT. We calculated individual pharmacokinetic parameters on each day of therapy using a published population pharmacokinetic model of busulfan and analyzed their changes. Population estimation of IOV was also performed with non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modeling. Potential predictors of significant decrease in busulfan clearance (CL) were assessed by using machine learning approaches., Results: IOV could be assessed in 136 children. Between day (D) 1 and D2, most patients (80%) experienced a decrease in busulfan CL, with a median change of - 7.9%. However, both large decreases (minimum, -  48.5%) and increases in CL (maximum, + 44%) were observed. Over D1-D3 of therapy, mean CL significantly decreased (-  15%), with a decrease of ≥ 20% in 22% of patients. Some patients also showed unstable CL from day to day. NLME modeling of IOV provided a coefficient of variation of 10.6% and 13.1% for volume of distribution (V d ) and CL, respectively. Some determinants of significant decreases in busulfan CL were identified, but predictive performance of the models was limited., Conclusions: Significant busulfan intra-individual variability may occur in children who receive a HSCT and is hardly predictable. The main risk is busulfan overexposure. Performing TDM repeatedly over therapy appears to be the best way to accurately estimate busulfan exposure and perform precision dosing.

Treosulfan is given off-label in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This study investigated treosulfan's pharmacokinetics (PKs), efficacy, and safety in a prospective trial. Pediatric patients (n = 87) receiving treosulfan-fludarabine conditioning were followed for at least 1 year posttransplant. PKs were described with a two-compartment model. During follow-up, 11 of 87 patients died and 12 of 87 patients had low engraftment (≤ 20% myeloid chimerism). For each increase in treosulfan area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC (0-∞) ) of 1,000 mg hour/L the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for mortality increase was 1.46 (1.23-1.74), and the hazard ratio for low engraftment was 0.61 (0.36-1.04). A cumulative AUC (0-∞) of 4,800 mg hour/L maximized the probability of success (> 20% engraftment and no mortality) at 82%. Probability of success with AUC (0-∞) between 80% and 125% of this target were 78% and 79%. Measuring PK at the first dose and individualizing the third dose may be required in nonmalignant disease., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)