Search

Introduction: To date, for all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, it is recommended to test for driver alterations to identify actionable therapeutic targets. In this light, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with next generation sequencing (NGS) has progressively gained increasing importance in clinical practice. Here, with the aim of assessing the distribution and the real-world frequency of gene alterations and their correlation with patient characteristics, we present the outcomes obtained using FoundationOne (F1CDx) and FoundationLiquid CDx (F1L/F1LCDx) NGS-based profiling in a nationwide initiative for advanced NSCLC patients., Methods: F1CDx (324 genes) was used for tissue samples, and F1L (70 genes) or F1LCDx (324 genes) for liquid biopsy, aiming to explore the real-world occurrence of molecular alterations in aNSCLC and their relationship with patients' characteristics., Results: Overall, 232 advanced NSCLC patients from 11 Institutions were gathered [median age 63 years; never/former or current smokers 29.3/65.9%; adenocarcinoma/squamous 79.3/12.5%; F1CDx/F1L+F1LCDx 59.5/40.5%]. Alterations were found in 170 different genes. Median number of mutated genes per sample was 4 (IQR 3-6) and 2 (IQR 1-3) in the F1CDx and F1L/F1LCDx cohorts, respectively. TP53 (58%), KRAS (22%), CDKN2A/B (19%), and STK11 (17%) alterations were the most frequently detected. Actionability rates (tier I and II) were comparable: 36.2% F1CDx vs. 34% ctDNA NGS assays (29.5% and 40.9% F1L and F1LCDx, respectively). Alterations in KEAP1 were significantly associated with STK11 and KRAS , so as TP53 with RB1 . Median tumor mutational burden was 6 (IQR 3-10) and was significantly higher in smokers. Median OS from metastatic diagnosis was 23 months (IQR 18.5-19.5) and significantly lower in patients harboring ≥3 gene mutations. Conditional three-year survival probabilities increased over time for patients profiled at initial diagnosis and exceeded those of individuals tested later in their clinical history after 12 months., Conclusion: This study confirms that NGS-based molecular profiling of aNSCLC on tissue or blood samples offers valuable predictive and prognostic insights., Competing Interests: MaS declares travel fees from Roche and Sanofi unrelated to the current work. LB declares travel fees from Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Takeda, Advisory Board role from AMGEN, Roche and Takeda, Speaker Honoraria from Amgen and BMS, Research funding from BMS, unrelated to the current work. HS declares advisory board role for BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Merck unrelated to the current work. MO declares travel accommodation from Eli Lilly and Advisory Board role/Speaker Honoraria from Astra Zeneca, BMS and MSD, outside the submitted work. ES and SC are employed at Roche. LP is the co-owner and an employee of AdRes, which has received project funding from Roche; outside the submitted work, received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational event from Fresenius Kabi, Janssen Cilag, SINPE; AdRes received grants or contracts from Janssen Cilag, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Astellas, Diasorin, Nestlè, Shionogi, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, and others, outside the submitted work. CP is employee of Adres. The funder had no role in the data collection and no access to patient level data. UM has received personal fees as consultant and/or speaker bureau from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eli Lilly, Diaceutics, GSK, Merck and AstraZeneca, Janssen, Diatech, Novartis and Hedera unrelated to the current work. SN reports personal fees as speaker bureau or advisor from Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, unrelated to the current work. EB received speakers’ and travel fees from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Pfizer, Helsinn, Eli-Lilly, BMS, Novartis, and Roche, institutional research grants from Astra-Zeneca and Roche. SP received honoraria or speakers’ fees from Astra-Zeneca, Eli-Lilly, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, and Roche, unrelated to the current work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Sposito, Belluomini, Nocini, Insolda, Scaglione, Menis, Simbolo, Lugini, Buzzacchino, Verderame, Spinnato, Aprile, Calvetti, Occhipinti, Marinelli, Veccia, Lombardo, Soto Parra, Ferraù, Savastano, Porta, Pradelli, Sicari, Castellani, Malapelle, Novello, Bria, Pilotto and Milella.)

Introduction: Despite several therapeutic efforts, lung cancer remains a highly lethal disease. Novel therapeutic approaches encompass immune-checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapeutics and antibody-drug conjugates, with different results. Several studies have been aimed at identifying biomarkers able to predict benefit from these therapies and create a prediction model of response, despite this there is a lack of information to help clinicians in the choice of therapy for lung cancer patients with advanced disease. This is primarily due to the complexity of lung cancer biology, where a single or few biomarkers are not sufficient to provide enough predictive capability to explain biologic differences; other reasons include the paucity of data collected by single studies performed in heterogeneous unmatched cohorts and the methodology of analysis. In fact, classical statistical methods are unable to analyze and integrate the magnitude of information from multiple biological and clinical sources (eg, genomics, transcriptomics, and radiomics)., Methods and Objectives: APOLLO11 is an Italian multicentre, observational study involving patients with a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) treated with innovative therapies. Retrospective and prospective collection of multiomic data, such as tissue- (eg, for genomic, transcriptomic analysis) and blood-based biologic material (eg, ctDNA, PBMC), in addition to clinical and radiological data (eg, for radiomic analysis) will be collected. The overall aim of the project is to build a consortium integrating different datasets and a virtual biobank from participating Italian lung cancer centers. To face with the large amount of data provided, AI and ML techniques will be applied will be applied to manage this large dataset in an effort to build an R-Model, integrating retrospective and prospective population-based data. The ultimate goal is to create a tool able to help physicians and patients to make treatment decisions., Conclusion: APOLLO11 aims to propose a breakthrough approach in lung cancer research, replacing the old, monocentric viewpoint towards a multicomprehensive, multiomic, multicenter model. Multicenter cancer datasets incorporating common virtual biobank and new methodologic approaches including artificial intelligence, machine learning up to deep learning is the road to the future in oncology launched by this project., Competing Interests: Disclosures Arsela Prelaj certifies that all conflicts of interest reported can be considered outside the present paper: consulting or advisory role for BMS, AstraZeneca; had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed by Roche, Italfarmaco; principal investigator of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Alessandra Laura Giulia Pedrocchi holds shares of Agade srl. Giuseppe Lo Russo has received fees for acting as a consultant from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Italfarmaco, Pfizer; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, BMS, MSD; has participated on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, has acted as principal investigator in sponsored clinical trials for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, Amgen, Sanofi. Rossana Berardi has received fees for acting as a consultant, for lectures and/or for participating to advisory board from BI, EISAI, GSK, Italfarmaco, Otsuka, Lilly, MSD; has received funding to Institution from AZ, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche; AMGEN. Giulia Galli declares the following conflicts of interest: Italpharma (advisory board); Roche (travel accommodation); Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD (honoraria for lectures). Federica Bertolini has received consultant fees from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Eisai, Sanofi and speakers fee from BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca. Filippo de Braud reports a patent for PCT/IB2020/055956 pending and a patent for IT201900009954 pending; and Roche, EMD Serono, NMS Nerviano Medical Science, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Menarini Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Merck Group, Pfizer, Servier, AMGEN, Incyte. No disclosures were reported by the other authors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The actual role of chemotherapy in vulvar cancer is undeniably a niche topic. The low incidence of the disease limits the feasibility of randomized trials. Decision making is thus oriented by clinical and pathological features, whose relevance is generally weighted against evidence from observational studies and clinical practice. The therapeutic management of vulvar cancer is increasingly codified and refined at an individual patient level. It is of note that the attitude towards evidence sharing and discussion within a multidisciplinary frame is progressively consolidating. Viable options included in the therapeutic armamentarium available for vulvar cancer patients are frequently an adaption from standards used for cervical or anal carcinoma. Chemotherapy is more frequently combined with radiotherapy as neo-/adjuvant or definitive treatment. Drugs commonly used are platinum derivative, 5-fluorouracil and mitomicin C, mostly in combination with radiotherapy for radiosensitization. Exclusive chemotherapy in the neo-/adjuvant setting comprises platinum-derivative, combined with bleomicin and methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, ifosfamide or taxanes. In advanced disease, current regimens include cisplatin-based chemoradiation, with or without 5-fluorouracil, or doublets with platinum in combination with a taxane. Our work is also enriched by a concise excursus on the biologic pathways underlying vulvar cancer. Introductory hints are also provided on targeted agents, a rapidly evolving research field.

Rationale: On October 15th, 2020, the first Surgical National Consensus Conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was promoted by the Italian Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC)., Method: The Consensus Conference was entirely held online due to anti-Covid-19 restrictions and after an introductory four lectures held by national and international experts in the field, a total of nine questions were presented and a digital "real-time" voting system was obtained. A consensus was reached if 75% or more of all panelists agreed on a given question., Results: A total of 202 physicians, from 76 different Italian Breast Centers homogeneously distributed throughout the Italian country, participated to the Conference. Most participants were surgeons (75%). Consensus was reached for seven out of the nine considered topics, including management of margins and lymph nodes at surgery, and there was good correspondence between the 32 "Expert Panelists" and the "Participants" to the Conference. Consensus was not achieved regarding the indications to NACT for high-grade luminal-like breast tumors, and the need to perform an axillary lymph node dissection in case of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node after NACT., Conclusions: NACT is a topic of major interest among surgeons, and there is need to develop shared guidelines. While a Consensus was obtained for most issues presented at this Conference, controversies still exist regarding indications to NACT in luminal B-like tumors and management of lymph node micrometastases. There is need for clinical studies and analysis of large databases to improve our knowledge on this subject., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have none to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Among solid tumors, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the paradigm of the application of precision medicine to clinical practice. Understanding many biomolecular mechanisms in the determinism of NSCLC has ensured the development of small molecules targeting specific genetic mutations with key roles in tumor disease progression. The ATLAS IALSC guidelines recommend carrying out screening for rearrangement of the ALK gene in all patients with advanced NSCLC, mainly for the histological type adenocarcinoma or with an adenocarcinoma component. The use of next generation sequencing (NGS) panels applied to liquid biopsy provides a powerful method for the genetic profiling of NSCLC for both standard treatment options and clinical trials. Liquid biopsy represents a powerful non-invasive methodology to provide clinically useful information in defining the therapeutic process of patients with translocated ALK NSCLC.

The therapeutic approach to the patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone, in the last decade, a profound revolution following the marketing of molecularly targeted drugs. The launch of a vast research activity with the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) applied to liquid biopsy should be underlined. This last methodology, which allows to identify the correct biomolecular structure of the neoplastic population, has achieved significant progress in the effective implementation of personalized medicine. Nevertheless, the liquid biopsy represents a useful diagnostic strategy in those patients in whom a rebiopsia is difficult for technical reasons or for the patient's health conditions. The liquid biopsy represents a substantial cultural revolution opening a scenario in the identification of molecular drivers in the treatment of lung neoplasms.

Here, we developed an unbiased, functional target-discovery platform to identify immunogenic proteins from primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells that had been induced to apoptosis by cisplatin (CDDP) treatment in vitro, as compared with their live counterparts. Among the multitude of proteins identified, some of them were represented as fragmented proteins in apoptotic tumor cells, and acted as non-mutated neoantigens (NM-neoAgs). Indeed, only the fragmented proteins elicited effective multi-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses, upon a chemotherapy protocol including CDDP. Importantly, these responses further increased upon anti-PD-1 therapy, and correlated with patients' survival and decreased PD-1 expression. Cross-presentation assays showed that NM-neoAgs were unveiled in apoptotic tumor cells as the result of caspase-dependent proteolytic activity of cellular proteins. Our study demonstrates that apoptotic tumor cells generate a repertoire of immunogenic NM-neoAgs that could be potentially used for developing effective T cell-based immunotherapy across multiple cancer patients.

Radium-223 has improved overall survival (OS) and reduced symptomatic skeletal events (SSE) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases (ALSYMPCA trial). Our aim was to assess clinical and biochemical factors related to survival, safety and survival outcomes of Radium-223 in a clinical practice setting. We retrospectively analysed 32 mCRPC patients treated with Radium-223, assessing bone scan, pain reduction, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥30% reduction). At scintigraphic assessment, 41% had partial response with a disease control rate of 91%; 56% had ALP response and 25% had PSA response; 41% had pain reduction with pain control of 72%. Scintigraphic response and stability were correlated with longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) (13 and 12 vs. 6 months; P=0.002) and mOS (16 and 12 vs. 6 months; P=0.003). ALP response was associated with longer mPFS (13 vs. 12 months; P=0.2) and mOS (16 vs. 12 months; P=0.2). PSA response was associated with longer mPFS (13 vs. 12 months; P=0.02), whereas mOS could not be computed. Pain response and stability were associated with survival benefit according to mPFS (13 and 12 vs. 9 months) and mOS (both 16 vs. 12 months) without statistical significance. Baseline ALP <220 UI/l, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 and absence of previous chemotherapy correlated with statistically significantly longer survival outcomes. Skeletal-related events (SRE) occurred in three patients and median time to first SRE was 9.5 months, mPFS was 12 months and mOS 14 months. G3-G4 toxicities developed in 16% of patients. Our results are in line with those reported in the pivotal trial and in other retrospective studies. In conclusion, Radium-223 was associated with high scintigraphic, biochemical and pain response rates and was tolerated well by most patients. Response to Radium-223 and better baseline factors correlated to longer survival in clinical practice experience as in the clinical trial setting.