Search

Purpose: We previously reported that protein kinase A type I (PKA(RIalpha)) overexpression was predictive of outcome in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) +/- short-term androgen deprivation (STAD) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 86-10. Here, we attempt to verify our prior findings and test the hypothesis that the relationship of the length of AD to patient outcome is affected by PKA(RIalpha) overexpression., Experimental Design: There were 313 cases in the RTOG 92-02 study cohort with available tissue and suitable staining by immunohistochemistry. Median follow-up was 10.1 years. The intensity of PKA(RIalpha) staining intensity was quantified manually and by image analysis. Multivariate analyses were done for overall mortality using Cox proportional hazards models and for local failure, biochemical failure, distant metastasis, and cause-specific mortality using Fine and Gray's regression models., Results: The expression levels of PKA(RIalpha), determined by manual and image analysis, were strongly correlated (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analyses, manual-quantified and image analysis-quantified PKA(RIalpha) staining intensities were independent predictors of distant metastasis (P < 0.01), local failure (P < 0.05), and biochemical failure (P

Objectives: To assess whether microvessel density (MVD), an immunohistochemical marker for tumor vascularity, predicts for radiotherapy (RT) outcome in locally advanced HNSCC patients., Methods: A total of 459 patients, enrolled on the RTOG 90-03 trial, had biopsy specimens submitted, and a value for MVD determined, prior to definitive RT. 450 patients were analyzable for this study. Tumor microvessels were stained for factor VIII-related antigen using a standard immunoperoxidase method. The mean number of stained microvessel profiles, from three x200 fields containing the highest MVD (hot spot), was recorded as the MVD. A prospective value of >or=60 was chosen as the threshold for high MVD, tumor vascularity., Results: The median follow-up for the analyzable patients with MVD assessment was 22.0 months and 79.1 months for all living patients. There were no differences concerning the pretreatment characteristics between those RTOG 90-03 patients with a value for MVD and those without a value for MVD. Thus, the present study cohort possessed comparable characteristics with the entire RTOG 90-03 population. MVD values ranged from 5 to 80, with a median value of 30. Only 37 of 450 (8.2%) patients possessed an MVD >or=60. There were no outcome differences for patients with MVD <60 versus >or=60 on multivariate analysis for time to local-regional failure (P = 0.89), time to distant metastasis (P = 0.80), disease-free survival (P = 0.46), and overall survival (P = 0.39)., Conclusions: In this large, correlative study, a MVD >or=60, ie, high tumor vascularity, did not predict for outcome in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.

Purpose: To report the quality assurance methodology used by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in the first cooperative group, multi-institution Phase II trial of transrectal ultrasound guided permanent radioactive implantation of the prostate for definitive treatment of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate., Methods and Materials: Participating institutions were credentialed to participate in this protocol, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-05. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 58 was used as the basis for definition of terms. The AAPM's dosimetric prerequisites for low energy interstitial brachytherapy sources were adopted. A nondigital approach to central review was used. The implant dosimetry was recalculated based upon centrally reviewed target volumes by both a radiation oncologist and a diagnostic radiologist., Results: There are differences in the definition of the postimplant prostate between the participating institution, the central review radiation oncologist, and the central review diagnostic radiologist. Thus, there are differences in dose/volume parameters. Six of the 95 patients reviewed did not meet the per protocol criteria based upon information supplied by the participating institution. This increased to 18 cases when using the postimplant target volume defined by the central oncologist and to 23 cases when defined by the radiologist., Conclusions: This work indicated that there is a need for a central review process of dose-volume analysis within the cooperative group setting. It is indicated that a digital approach to centralized review, which has now been developed, would result in a higher quality and easier review.

Objectives: To determine the influence of age and comorbidity in patient selection for treatment of stage III NSCLC with combined modality therapy (CMT)., Methods: There were 102 patients with a Karnofsky Performance Score greater than or equal to 70, and clinical stage III NSCLC analyzed retrospectively for comorbidity. All patients received radiotherapy, and 57 (56%) received CMT with sequential and/or concurrent chemotherapy. Comorbidity was rated retrospectively using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G). The effect of an extremely severe comorbidity score on patient selection and overall survival (OS) was evaluated., Results: Presence of a grade 4 comorbidity (P = 0.02) and use of radiation only (P < 0.01) were associated with a statistically significant inferior OS on multivariate analysis, whereas age greater than or equal to 70, clinical stage IIIB, >5% weight loss, and radiation dose >63 Gy were not. Patients receiving CMT were significantly younger (P < 0.001), with less comorbidity (P < 0.001), and weight loss (P = 0.003) compared with patients receiving radiotherapy alone. A multivariate analysis revealed that age (P < 0.001), comorbidity (P = 0.007), and weight loss (P = 0.002) were independent factors influencing patient selection for CMT., Conclusions: Age effects patient selection for CMT independent of comorbidity and weight loss in patients with stage III NSCLC and good performance status. This might be related to physician's biases regarding tolerability of CMT in the elderly, and might explain under-representation of elderly in clinical trials of lung cancer. Comorbidity assessment should be included in protocols studying locally advanced stage NSCLC and may be useful for stratification.

Purpose: To determine whether overall treatment time affects outcomes after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)., Methods and Materials: Data were analyzed from 3 prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (RTOG 91-06, 92-04, and 94-10) in which immediate concurrent chemoradiation (cisplatin-based) was the primary therapy for good-performance status Stage III (and selected inoperable Stage II) NSCLC. "Short" overall treatment time (per protocol) was defined as completing treatment within 5 days of plan; other patients were considered to have had "prolonged" treatment time (protocol violation); treatment time was also analyzed as a continuous variable in a multivariate model. Actuarial analysis was performed for overall survival, progression-free survival, freedom from local-regional progression, and toxicity., Results: A total of 474 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 6.1 years. Treatment time was delivered per protocol in 387 (82%), whereas 87 patients (18%) had a prolonged treatment time. Long treatment time was significantly associated with severe acute esophagitis. Median survival was slightly better in patients completing treatment on time (19.5 months vs. 14.8 months), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15) in the univariate analysis. However, in the multivariate analysis of treatment time as a continuous variable, prolonged treatment time was significantly associated with poorer survival (p = 0.02), indicating a 2% increase in the risk of death for each day of prolongation in therapy. Histology (squamous fared worse) and performance status were also significant in the multivariate model., Conclusions: This retrospective analysis demonstrates a correlation between prolonged overall radiotherapy treatment time and survival in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, even when concurrent chemotherapy is used. Further study of novel radiation-chemotherapy dose/fractionation regimens is warranted.

Purpose: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, and toxicity of paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin combined with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)., Patients and Methods: LD-SCLC patients with measurable disease, Karnofsky performance score of > or = 70, and adequate organ function who were previously untreated were eligible for the study. Treatment was as follows. In cycle 1 of chemotherapy, concurrent thoracic radiation therapy was administered. In cycles 2 to 4, chemotherapy was administered alone. In cycle 1, chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) intravenous over 3 hours on day 1, etoposide 60 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1 and 80 mg/m(2) orally on days 2 and 3, and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1. In cycles 2 to 4, the paclitaxel dose was increased to 175 mg/m(2), with the etoposide and cisplatin doses remaining the same as in cycle 1. The thoracic radiation therapy consisted of 1.5 Gy in 30 fractions (total dose, 45 Gy) administered 5 days a week for 3 weeks., Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled onto the study, and 53 were assessable. The major toxicities included grade 3 and 4 acute neutropenia (32% and 43%, respectively) and grade 3 and 4 esophagitis (32% and 4%, respectively). Two patients died as a result of therapy (one died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and one died of sepsis). There was one late fatal pulmonary toxicity. The median survival time was 24.7 months. The 2-year survival rate was 54.7%. The median progression-free survival time was 13 months, with a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 26.4%., Conclusion: Although this therapeutic regimen is effective in the treatment of patients with LD-SCLC, it is unlikely that the three-drug combination with thoracic radiation therapy will improve the survival times compared with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen with thoracic radiation therapy in LD-SCLC patients.

Purpose: The purpose of RTOG 97-12 was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer., Patients and Methods: Sixty-four patients received four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v.) and etoposide (120 mg/m(2) i.v. Days 1-3) (PE), with concurrent thoracic RT starting on Day 1. Thoracic RT was given during the first two cycles with 1.8 Gy/fraction daily to the clinical target volume, followed by thoracic RT to the gross tumor volume b.i.d. for the last 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 treatment days (total dose 50.4, 54.0, 57.6, 61.2, or 64.8 Gy, respectively). The MTD was based on the dose that produced Grades 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity (mainly esophagitis and pneumonitis) in greater than 50% of patients., Results: After the first 8 patients were enrolled in Arm 1, administration of etoposide was changed from 120 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 2 and 3 of each cycle to 240 mg/m(2) p.o. for patient convenience as outpatients. Total thoracic RT doses from 50.4 Gy to 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks given with PE were well tolerated. Three of the first 5 patients in the 64.8 Gy arm developed Grade 3 acute esophagitis; the MTD was determined to be 61.2 Gy. Fifty-four (87%) of the 62 evaluable patients achieved a complete (68%) or partial (19%) tumor response. The 18-month survival was 25% for patients receiving 50.4 Gy and 82% for those receiving 61.2 Gy., Conclusions: The MTD for this accelerated thoracic RT regimen with concurrent PE was 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks.

Purpose: To determine the prognostic role of comorbidity in Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated definitively with radiotherapy alone., Methods and Materials: A total of 112 patients with clinical Stage III NSCLC (American Joint Commission on Cancer 1997) enrolled in four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies (83-11, 84-03, 84-07, and 88-08 nonchemotherapy arms) at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively for overall survival (OS) and comorbidity. Of the 112 patients, 105 (94%) completed their assigned radiotherapy. The median assigned dose was 50.4 Gy to the lymphatics (range 45-50.4 Gy) and 70.2 Gy to the primary tumor (range 60-79.2 Gy). Comorbidity was rated retrospectively using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) and Charlson scales. Karnofsky performance scores (KPSs) and weight loss were prospectively recorded. Because only 8 patients had a KPS of <70, these patients were combined with patients who had a KPS of 70. The OS of this group was compared with that of the patients with better KPSs (>70)., Results: The median survival was 10.39 months (range 7.87-12.91). The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate was 20.5%, 12.5%, and 7.1%, respectively. On univariate analysis, clinical stage (IIIA vs. IIIB) was found to be a statistically significant factor influencing OS (p = 0.026), and the histologic features, grade, tumor size as measured on CT scans, age, tobacco use, weight loss >or=5%, and total dose delivered to the primary tumor were not. A KPS of 2 (p <0.0001) were associated with statistically significant inferior OS. Multivariate analysis with clinical stage, KPS, and comorbidity (severity index) of all patients showed that a KPS 2 were independently associated with inferior OS; clinical tumor stage was not found to be an independent prognostic factor., Conclusion: KPS and comorbidity are important independent prognostic factors in Stage III NSCLC. Comorbidity should be included in protocols studying advanced stage NSCLC and used for stratification.

Purpose: To compare the outcome of treatment of mediastinoscopy-verified N2 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by either surgery or radiotherapy (RT), with both options followed by consolidation chemotherapy., Methods and Materials: A randomized Phase III trial for Stage IIIA (T1-T3N2M0) non-small cell lung cancer was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group between April 1990 and April 1994. After documentation of N2 disease by mediastinoscopy or anterior mediastinotomy, patients received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and mitomycin-C. Mitomycin-C was later dropped from the induction regimen. Patients were then randomized to surgery or RT (64 Gy in 7 weeks) followed by cisplatin and vinblastine., Results: RTOG 89-01 accrued 75 patients, of whom 73 were eligible and analyzable. Twelve patients received induction chemotherapy but were not randomized to RT or surgery thereafter. Forty-five patients were randomized to postinduction RT or surgery. Of the analyzable patients, 90% had a Karnofsky performance score of 90-100, 18% had weight loss >5%, 37% had squamous cell histologic features, and 54% had bulky N2 disease. The distribution of bulky N2 disease was uniform among the treatment arms. The incidence of Grade 4 toxicity was 56% in patients receiving mitomycin-C and 29% in those who did not. Only 1 patient in each group had acute nonhematologic toxicity greater than Grade 3 (nausea and vomiting). No acute Grade 4 radiation toxicity developed. The incidences of long-term toxicity were equivalent across the arms. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: 2 patients in the surgical arms (one late pulmonary toxicity and one pulmonary embolus), and 1 patient in the radiation arm (radiation pneumonitis). Induction chemotherapy was completed in 78% of the patients. Complete resection was performed in 73% of 26 patients undergoing thoracotomy. Consolidation chemotherapy was completed in 75% of the patients. No statistically significant difference was found among the treatment arms. The overall progression-free survival rate was 53% at 1 year and 17% at 3 years. The median progression-free survival was 14 months. No difference in the 1-year survival rate (70% vs. 66%) or median survival time (19.4 vs. 17.4 months) between the surgery and RT arms. The median survival in the patients receiving induction chemotherapy only was 8.9 months. Mitomycin-C had no impact on survival (p = 0.75). No statistically significant difference was noted in the time to local failure between the surgical and RT arms., Conclusion: The patient accrual to this trial made its results inconclusive, but several observations are notable. In this trial, histologic confirmation of N2 disease in the surgical and nonsurgical arms eliminated the usual biases from clinical staging. In this setting, local control and survival were essentially equal between the surgical and RT arms. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of nonsurgical therapy were comparable to published surgical trials of N2 disease.

Purpose: To determine the prognostic role of comorbidity in Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with surgery or radiotherapy (RT)., Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty-three patients with clinical Stage I NSCLC were analyzed for overall survival (OS) and comorbidity. One hundred thirteen patients underwent surgery (surgical group) and 50 patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT group). Ninety-six percent of the surgical group had lobectomy or pneumonectomy, and negative margins were achieved in 96% of the patients. The median dose to the tumor for the RT group was 61.2 Gy (range 30.8-77.4). The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) and the Charlson scale were used to rate comorbidity. Karnofsky performance scores (KPS) were available in 42 patients; the rest of the scores were determined retrospectively by two physicians independently, with 97% agreement., Results: The OS was 44% for the surgical group and 5% for the RT group at 5 years. Noncancer-related mortality was observed in 31% and 62% of the surgical and RT patients, respectively. On univariate analysis, performed on all patients (n = 163), squamous cell histologic type (p <0.001), clinical Stage T2 (p = 0.062), tumor size >4 cm (p = 0.065), >40 pack-year tobacco use (p <0.001), presence of a CIRS-G score of 4 (extremely severe, CIRS-G4: [+]) (p <0.001), severity index of >2 (p <0.001), Charlson score >2 (p = 0.004), KPS <70 (p <0.001), and treatment with RT (p <0.001) were associated with a statistically significant inferior OS. Multivariate analysis with histologic features, clinical T stage, age, tobacco use, KPS, comorbidity [CIRS-G(4)] and treatment group on all patients showed that squamous cell histology, >40 pack-year tobacco use, KPS <70, and presence of CIRS-G(4) were independently associated with an inferior OS. Treatment modality, T stage, and age did not have any statistically significant effect on OS. Statistically significant differences were found between the surgical and RT groups in Charlson score (p = 0.001), CIRS-G total score (p = 0.004), severity index (p = 0.006), CIRS-G4(+) (p <0.001), KPS (p <0.001), amount of tobacco use (p = 0.002), clinical tumor size (p <0.001), clinical T stage (p = 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p = 0.001), and age (p = 0.008), in favor of the surgical group., Conclusion: The presence of significant comorbidity and KPS of <70 are both important prognostic factors, but were found to be independent of each other in Stage I NSCLC. Therefore, comorbidity and KPS assessment are recommended when analyzing the prognostic effects of tumor or treatment-related factors on OS.

Purpose: Survival of patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is predicted by the stage of the disease and other characteristics. This analysis was undertaken to identify these characteristics in a large cooperative group patient population, as well as to define subgroups of the population with differing outcomes., Patients and Methods: Analysis included 1,999 patients treated in 9 RTOG trials between 1983 and 1994 with thoracic irradiation (RT) with (n = 355) or without chemotherapy (CT)., Results: In univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with an improved survival: use of CT, CT delivered without major deviation, abnormal pulmonary function tests, normal hemoglobin, protein, LDH and BUN, presence of dyspnea, hemoptysis, cough or hoarseness, uninvolved lymph nodes, T1 or T2 stage, no malignant pleural effusion (PE), weight loss of < 8%, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of at least 90, adenocarcinoma histology, female gender, and age less than 70 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was subsequently applied to identify 5 patient subgroups with significantly different median survival times (MST): Group I, KPS of > or = 90, who received chemotherapy (MST 16.2 months); Group II, KPS of > or = 90, who received no CT, but had no PE (MST 11.9 months); Group III, KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, with non-large cell histology (MST 9.6 months); Group IV, KPS > or = 90, but with PE, or KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, and with large cell histology, or older than 70 years, but without PE (MST 5.6-6.4 months); Group V, older than 70, with PE (MST 2.9 months)., Conclusion: Cisplatinum-based CT improves survival, for excellent prognosis of LA-NSCLC patients, over RT alone. The presence of a malignant pleural effusion is a major negative prognostic factor for survival. The identification of RPA prognostic groups among patients with LA-NSCLC provides prognostic information and may serve as a basis of stratification in future trials.

Purpose: To assess the outcome of a multi-institutional, national cooperative group study attempting functional preservation of the anorectum for patients with limited, distal rectal cancer., Methods and Materials: Between September 21, 1989 and November 1, 1992, a Phase II trial of sphincter-sparing therapy was conducted for patients with clinically mobile rectal cancers located below the pelvic peritoneal reflection. Protocol treatment was designed for patients who were, in the judgement of their attending surgeon, unsuitable for anal sphincter conservation in the context of anterior resection, and would have required abdominoperineal resection (APR) as conventional surgical therapy. Primary cancers were estimated to be 4 cm or less in largest clinical diameter, and occupied 40% or less of the rectal circumference. Chest radiography and computerized axial tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis excluded patients with overt lymphatic or hematogenous metastases. Protocol surgery was intended to remove the primary cancer by en-bloc, transmural excision of an ellipse of rectal wall by transanal, transcoccygeal, or trans-sacral technique, while conserving the anal sphincter. Based on tumor size, T classification, grade, and adequacy of surgical margins, patients were allocated to one of three treatment assignments: observation, or adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and one of two different dose levels of local-regional radiation. After completion of protocol therapy, patients were observed with follow-up that included periodic general physical and rectal examination, determinations of CEA, abdominopelvic CT, chest radiography, and surveillance endoscopy. Sixty-five eligible and analyzable patients were registered., Results: With minimum follow-up of 5 years and median follow-up of 6.1 years, 11 patients have failed: 3 patients recurred local-regionally only, 3 patients had distant failure alone, and 5 patients manifested local-regional and distant failure. Eight patients died of intercurrent illness. Local-regional failure correlated with T-category revealed: T1 1/27 (4%), T2 4/25 (16%), and T3 3/13 (23%). Local-regional failure escalated with percentage involvement of the rectal circumference: 2/31 (6%) among patients with cancers involving 20% or less of the rectal circumference, and 6/34 (18%) among patients with cancers involving 21-40% of the circumference. Distant dissemination rose with T-category with 1/27 (4%) T1, 3/25 (12%) T2, and 4/13 (31%) T3 patients manifesting hematogenous spread. Eight patients (12%) required temporary or permanent colostomy. Five of 8 patients with local-regional recurrence achieved local-regional control with management including surgery, although 4 of these patients subsequently developed distant dissemination. Three patients (5%) had persistent, uncontrolled, local disease. Actuarial freedom from pelvic relapse at 5 years is 88% based on the entire study population, and 86% for the less favorable patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 5-FU., Conclusion: Conservative, sphincter-sparing therapy is a feasible alternative treatment for selected patients with limited cancer involving the middle and lower rectum. Risk of both local and distant failure appears to escalate with increasing T-category (depth of invasion). Results achieved in the multi-institutional, cooperative group setting approximate results reported from single institutions.

Inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer has become the domain of combined-modality treatment based on several recent, large, phase III studies. Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase II studies have suggested improvements in response and short-term survival, using a strategy of intensification of dosing and scheduling of cisplatin-based regimens and either standard or hyperfractionated radiation therapy. However, some trials also have shown higher rates of severe acute toxicity and more frequent severe late toxicity. There appears to be an institutional learning curve in administering these more complex, intense regimens and in effective management of the acute toxicities. As the RTOG institution accrued more cases onto the intensified regimen studies, toxicity management improved, treatment was given with fewer interruptions or dosage reductions, and survival rates improved. Quality-adjusted survival analysis, in which survival time is reduced by the amount of time spent with severe toxicity, shows that the survival gains observed with some concurrent regimens may be negated by time spent with toxicity. Future attempts to optimize combined-modality therapy must take account of toxicity issues in the study design by incorporating less toxic chemotherapy agents, normal tissue protectors, tumor-targeting sensitizing agents, normal tissue-sparing radiation therapy techniques (e.g., three-dimensional conformal), and proactive, aggressive management of toxicity.

Purpose: To determine if patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and positive supraclavicular nodes (SN+) have a similar outcome to other patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC (SN-) when treated with modern chemoradiotherapy., Methods and Materials: Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database, data were retrospectively analyzed from five RTOG trials studying chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC: 88-04, 88-08 (chemo-RT arm), 90-15, 91-06, 92-04. Comparisons were made between the SN+ and SN- subgroups with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastases-free survival (MFS) using the log rank test. Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the effect of several potential confounding variables, including histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), age (>60 vs. < or = 60), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (<90 vs. > or = 90), weight loss (> or = 5% vs. <5%), and gender., Results: A total of 256 Stage IIIB patients were identified, of whom 47 had supraclavicular nodes (SN+) and 209 did not (SN-). Statistically significantly more SN+ patients had nonsquamous histology (p = 0.05); otherwise, known prognostic factors were well balanced. The median survival for SN+ patients was 16.2 months, vs. 15.6 months for SN- patients. The 4-year actuarial survival rates were 21% and 16% for SN+ and SN- patients respectively (p = 0.44). There was no statistically significant difference in the 4-year PFS rates (19% vs. 14%, p = 0.48). The Cox analysis did not show the presence or absence of supraclavicular nodal disease to be a prognostic factor for survival, MFS, or PFS. The only statistically significant factor on multivariate analysis was gender, with males having a 40% greater risk of mortality than females (p = 0.03). There were no clinically significant differences in toxicity when comparing SN+ vs. SN- patients. Among the 47 SN+ patients, there were no reported cases of brachial plexopathy or other > or = Grade 2 late neurologic toxicity., Conclusions: When treated with modern chemoradiotherapy, the outcome for patients with supraclavicular metastases appears to be similar to that of other Stage IIIB patients. SN+ patients should continue to be enrolled in trials studying aggressive chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced NSCLC.

Purpose: It was observed by Jeremic et al. that a shorter interfraction interval (IFI) was associated with an improved survival in patients (pts) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX-RT), with or without chemotherapy (CT). Our analysis was undertaken to verify this hypothesis., Methods and Materials: Records of patients treated on 5 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies were reviewed, and an actual IFI, defined as a mean of all daily IFIs, was calculated. RT dose was 1.2 Gy BID to 69.6 Gy. The relationship between the length of IFI and the median survival time and incidence of esophagitis was investigated., Results: In 682 pts eligible for this analysis, a full dose of RT was delivered and at least 90% of all daily IFIs were available. The actual mean IFI was as follows: 4-4.9 h in 51% of pts; 5-5.9 h in 17%; 6-6.9 h in 28% and 7-8 h in 4%. In multivariate analysis, only lack of weight loss, use of CT, low nodal stage and good KPS, but not IFI (4-6 h vs. 6-8 h) were associated with an improved survival for all pts (p values: <0.0001; <0.0001; 0.006; 0.006, and 0.73, respectively), as well as for HFX-RT only pts. For the CT-HFX-RT pts, not enough data points are available for a meaningful analysis. Length of IFI did not influence the incidence of Grade 3 or higher esophagitis (p = 0.82), but use of CT was associated with a 12-fold greater risk of developing severe esophagitis (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Length of IFI (4-6 h vs. 6-8 h) did not influence survival and acute complications incidence in pts with NSCLC treated in RTOG studies with HFX-RT to 69.6 Gy. Previously identified factors, such as use of CT, minimal weight loss, good KPS and low nodal stage, were confirmed again to be associated with a favorable prognosis in a multivariate analysis. Use of CT was associated with a 12-fold greater risk of developing severe esophagitis than HFX-RT alone. It appears that an IFI of 4-8 hr is acceptable in clinical practice for pts with NSCLC, treated with HFX-RT.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of cell type within non-small cell carcinoma of lung (NSCCL) on failure patterns when chemotherapy (CT) is combined with radiation therapy (RT)., Methods and Materials: Data from 4 RTOG studies including 1415 patients treated with RT alone, and 5 RTOG studies including 350 patients also treated with chemotherapy (RT + CT) were analyzed. Patterns of progression were evaluated for squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) (n = 946), adenocarcinoma (AD) (n = 532) and large cell carcinoma (LC) (n = 287)., Results: When treated with RT alone, SQ was more likely to progress at the primary site than LC (26% vs. 20%, p = 0.05). AD and LC were more likely to progress in the brain than SQ (20% and 18% vs. 11%, p = 0.0001 and 0.011, respectively). No differences were found in intrathoracic and distant metastasis by cell type. When treated with RT + CT, AD was less likely to progress at the primary than either SQ or LC (23% vs. 34% and 40%, respectively; p = 0.057 and 0.035). AD was more likely than SQ to metastasize to the brain (16% vs. 8%, p = 0.03), and other distant sites (26% vs. 14%,p = 0.019). No differences were found in intrathoracic metastasis. LC progressed at the primary site more often with RT + CT than with RT alone (40% vs. 20%, p = 0.036). Death with no clinical progression was more likely with SQ than AD or LC for RT alone and RT + CT (p < 0.01). Brain metastasis was altered little by the addition of CT, but other distant metastases were significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in all cell types by the addition of CT., Conclusion: CT, although effective in reducing distant metastasis in all types of NSCCL, has different effects on the primary tumor by cell type, and has no effect on brain metastasis or death with no progression. Different treatment strategies should be considered for the different cell types to advance progress with RT + CT in NSCCL.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival differences in three chemotherapy (ChT)/radiation therapy (RT) sequencing strategies for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods and Materials: Five completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials for Stage II-IIIA/B inoperable NSCLC patients employed one of the three following strategy groupings: 1) sequential ChT followed by standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); 2) combined sequential and concurrent ChT and standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); or 3) concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT (69.6 Gy in 6 weeks). All five trials required KPS > or = 70; two trials (314 patients) required <5% weight loss and three trials (147 patients) had no minimum weight loss requirement. In all five trials the ChT used cisplatin with either vinblastine or oral etoposide. Combining data for the five trials yielded an evaluable group of 461 patients. The three methods of sequencing ChT and RT were evaluated for differences in response, acute and late toxicity, patterns of failure, and survival. Acute toxicity was defined as that occurring within 90 days from the start of RT. Late toxicity was defined as that occurring after 90 days from the start of RT. Acute or late toxicity > or = grade 3 was defined as severe. Site of first failure was recorded by date. In-field failure excluded distant metastasis as a failure and included only tissue in the RT treatment field. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as survival without evidence of intra- or extrathoracic tumor or death from any cause., Results: Group 1 had a lower overall response rate (63%) compared to either Group 2 (77%) or Group 3 (79%), p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively. Overall grade 4/5 acute toxicities were nearly equal between groups. The severe nonhematologic acute toxicities were significantly different by strategy group (p < 0.0001). Group 1 and 2 were not statistically different. Group 3 had significantly more patients with severe acute nonhematologic toxicity (55%) than either Group 1 (27%) or 2 (34%) with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively. This was due to a severe acute esophagitis rate of 34% for Group 3 versus 1.3% for Group 1 and 6% for Group 2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Overall grade 4/5 late toxicities did not differ by group. Severe late nonhematologic toxicities were different by group (p = 0.0098). Group 1 patients had significantly fewer severe late nonhematologic toxicities (14%) compared to patients in Groups 2 (26%) or 3 (28%) (p = 0.046 and 0.038, respectively). Severe late lung toxicity was 10% for Group 1 compared to 21% and 20% for Groups 2 and 3, respectively. Severe late lung toxicities differed by group (p = 0.033), but not severe late esophagitis (p = 0.077). There were no differences between the three strategy groups for patterns of first failure. The in-field failures were higher in Group 2 (71%) compared to Groups 1 (56%) and 3 (55%), p = 0.0478. Pairwise comparisons yielded p-values of 0.068 and 0.015 for Group 2 versus 1 and Group 2 versus 3, respectively. Three-year PFS was better in Group 2 (15%) and 3 (15%) compared to Group 1 (7%), but not statistically significant (p = 0.454). Similarly, in-field PFS was better in Group 2 (17%) and 3 (20%) than Group 1 (9%), but not significant (p = 0.167). There were improvements in 3-year survival for Group 2 (17%) and Group 3 (25%) compared to Group 1 (15%), but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.47). The same results were present for patients with less than 5% weight loss and patients with stage IIIA tumors., Conclusion: Thus, concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT had a higher incidence of severe acute esophageal toxicity. Severe late lung toxicity with concurrent ChT/hyperfractionated RT, as well as with induction ChT followed by concurrent ChT/standard RT, may be greater compared to sequential ChT/RT. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Purpose: This study was conducted to see what fraction of prostate cancer patients with biopsy-proven nodes are free of cancer 10 years after radiation treatment., Methods and Materials: RTOG protocol #75-06 included 90 patients with biopsy-proven pelvic nodal involvement treated with radiation. They have been continuously follow-up since treatment. When feasible, current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been solicited from patients clinically cancer-free (no evidence of disease, NED) at 10 years, to confirm cure., Results: The 10-year survival was 29%, the 10-year clinical NED survival 7%. PSA levels were obtained in 2 of 5 10-year clinical NED patients, they were both less than 0.8 ng/ml. The 2 proven cures were both clinical stage T-3, Gleason Score 6 and 8, and had 2 and 1 positive nodes, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed Gleason sum was significantly associated with clinical survival without disease., Conclusion: A small fraction of node-positive patients are cured at 10-year follow-up by radiation therapy (2 of 90 with PSA +3 of 90 by clinical endpoints). Innovative treatment programs should be directed at node-positive patients in an effort to improve the fraction cured.

A hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX RT) trial (1.2 Gy twice daily, b.i.d.) (HFX) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that 69.6 Gy resulted in better survival than did lower total doses (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, RTOG 83-11) and that cisplatin concurrent with irradiation improved local control and survival over RT alone (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, RTOG 91-06). Concurrent combination chemotherapy and HFX could improve both local and systemic control. In a phase II trial (RTOG 91-06) for inoperable NSCLC, two cycles of PE were used [cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8, etoposide 50 mg orally (p.o.) b.i.d., 75 mg/day if body surface area (BSA) < 1.7 m2, days 1-14] starting on day 1 of HFX (69.6 Gy) and repeated on day 29. HFX/PE was compared with HFX (69.6 Gy) from an earlier phase II trial (RTOG 83-11). Seventy-six patients treated with HFX/PE and 203 patients who received HFX alone were compared for toxicity, response, survival, and patterns of failure. The rates of grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity were similar (3.0% for HFX/PE, 3.0% for HFX), but grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred only with HFX/PE 56.6%. Three (3.9%) HFX/PE patients had fatal toxicity (2 pulmonary, 1 renal); 1 HFX patient had fatal esophageal toxicity. Response and metastasis rates were similar for the two treatments, but infield (p = 0.054) and overall (p = 0.04) progression-free survival rates were better with HFX/PE. Median survivals were 18.9 months with HFX/PE and 10.6 months with HFX. Two-year survival rates were 36% for HFX/PE and 22% for HFX (p = 0.014). The differences in survival between HFX/PE and HFX remained borderline statistically significant (p = 0.0593) in the multivariate model, which included weight loss, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), sex, and stage. HFX/PE is an effective regimen in patients with inoperable NSCLC, although it is considerably more toxic, and is undergoing a comparison in a three-arm randomized phase III study against induction cisplatin/vinblastine plus standard once-daily RT and against cisplatin/vinblastine concurrent with standard RT.

Purpose: To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial., Methods and Materials: Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS > or =70 and weight loss < or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively., Results: Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the severity and distribution of the toxicities associated with the two different combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy., Methods and Materials: This prospective randomized trial studied toxicities associated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent treatment (Arm 1) vs. immediate concurrent chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CT/RT) (Arm 2). Arm 1 consisted of vinblastine (VB), 5 mg/M2 I.V. bolus weekly, weeks 1-5 and cisplatin (DDP), 100 mg/M2 days 1 and 29, DDP 75 mg/M2, days 50, 71, and 92. Daily RT started on day 50; a total dose of 63 Gy was given in 34 fractions in 7 weeks. In Arm 2 RT started day 1; a total dose of 69.6 Gy was given in 58 fractions of 1.2 Gy bid, 5 days per week for 6 weeks with DDP 50 mg/M2 i.v. days 1 and 8, and oral VP-16 50 mg b.i.d. during the first 10 days of RT. DDP/VP-16 were repeated beginning day 29. Survival was used as the Phase II endpoint., Results: Between July 1992 and February 1994, 168 patients were randomized; 162 evaluable patients had minimum follow-up of 20 months. Eighty patients were registered to Arm 1 and 82 to Arm 2. Pretreatment characteristics were distributed evenly. Arm 1 had significantly more Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (62%) than Arm 2 (33%) (p = 0.021). Acute nonhematologic Grade 3+ toxicity was also greater (p = 0.018) in Arm 2 than Arm 1 due mainly to esophagitis (38 vs. 6%; p < 0.0001). Grade 3+ late esophageal toxicity was 12% on Arm 2 compared to 3% on Arm 1 (p = 0.006). There were no differences between the two arms in compliance with protocol specifications for either RT or CT. At 1 year, 31.7% of patients had in-field progression on Arm 1 compared to 19.8% on Arm 2 (p = 0.042), but overall progression-free survival rates were nearly identical; 50 and 49% for Arms I and II, respectively, at 12 months. One-year and median survivals were 65% and 15.5 months on Arm 1 compared to 58% and 14.4 months on Arm 2., Conclusion: Whereas hematologic toxicity was greater in Arm 1, esophageal toxicity, both acute and late, was greater in Arm 2. Infield progression was lower in Arm 2, but overall progression rates were similar and there were no significant differences in survival between the two arms. A 3-arm randomized Phase III study is underway in the RTOG to compare sequential and concurrent CT/RT.

Purpose: Despite aggressive surgery and postoperative radiation therapy, only 30% of patients who have advanced, potentially resectable carcinomas of the head and neck survive for 5 years. In the hope of improving this situation we studied the effect of postoperative radiotherapy delivered concurrently with cisplatin., Methods and Materials: Patients who had Stage IV tumors and/or involved surgical margins received 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks plus 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin on radiotherapy days 1, 23 and 43. Fifty-two patients participated in this trial and 51 were evaluated. Forty-three (84%) patients had pathologic T3 or T4 disease, 43 (84%) had Stage IV disease, and 27 (53%) had histologically involved surgical margins., Results: Severe and life-threatening toxicities occurred in 20% and 12% of patients, respectively; the most common drug-related toxicities were leukopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting. Seventeen patients (43%) remain alive with no evidence of disease. Four patients (8%) died with no evidence of neoplastic disease, and one patient has died of a second independent malignancy. By actuarial analysis at 3 years, 48% of patients are alive, 81% have locoregional control of disease, and 57% are free of distant metastases., Conclusions: Based on comparison with similar patients treated in a prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Intergroup trial (RTOG), we conclude that postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin may improve locoregional control rates and should be prospectively tested.

Purpose: Although androgen suppression results in a tumor response/remission in the majority of patients with carcinoma of the prostate, its potential value as an adjuvant has not been substantiated., Materials and Methods: In 1987, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients had been accessioned to the study. Of these, 945 remained analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant arm and 468 on the observation arm., Results: Actuarial projections show that at 5 years, 84% of patients on the adjuvant goserelin arm and 71% on the observation arm remain without evidence of local recurrence (P < .0001). The corresponding figures for freedom from distant metastases and disease-free survival are 83% versus 70% (P < .001) and 60% and 44% (P < .0001). If prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 1.5 ng is included as a failure (after > or = 1 year), the 5-year disease-free survival rate on the adjuvant goserelin arm is 53% versus 20% on the observation arm (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rate (for the entire population) is 75% on the adjuvant arm versus 71% on the observation arm (P = .52). However, in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, the difference in actuarial 5-year survival (66% on the adjuvant goserelin arm v 55% on the observation arm) reaches statistical significance (P = .03)., Conclusion: Application of androgen suppression as an adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control and freedom from disease progression. At this point, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, a significant improvement in survival has been observed only in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10.

Fifteen patients with stage II, IIIA, and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received subcutaneous (s.c.) recombinant, glycosylated, human interferon-beta 1a (Rebif; rHuIFN-beta 1a) on each day of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) given in 2.0 Gy fractions to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. The rHuIFN-beta 1a was generated in CHO cells by recombinant DNA technology and is identical to natural IFN-beta produced by fibroblasts in primary sequence and glycosylation. Cohorts of three patients each were treated with escalating doses of rHuIFN-beta 1a: 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day. Acute toxicity was assessed according to modified WHO criteria; late toxicity was graded using RTOG late toxicity criteria. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of rHuIFN-beta 1a was defined as the dose level immediately below that in which dose-limiting toxicity occurred in > or = two of six patients. Immunomodulatory effects and antigenicity of rHuIFN-beta 1a were assessed by 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin levels and by measurement of anti-rHuIFN-beta antibodies, respectively. Fourteen of fifteen patients experienced grades 1-3 acute (early) toxicity (< or = 90 days), which was primarily gastrointestinal: dysphagia/esophagitis (14/15), nausea/vomiting (12/15), anorexia (7/15), and liver transaminasemia (6/15). One of three patients treated with 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day (total rHuIFN-beta 1a dose 672 MIU) died of complications secondary to pneumonia, sepsis, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and radiation pneumonitis. Twelve patients were evaluable for late toxicity (> 90 days). Maximum toxicity was grade 0 in five patients, grade 1 in four patients, and grade 5 in one patient (radiation pneumonitis). Clinical responses from the combination were 1/15 CR, 6/15 PR, 6/15 stable disease, and 1/15 progressive disease. The MTD of rHuIFN-beta 1a has been estimated at 12 MIU/m2 per treatment day when given daily during conventional RT to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. Biologic response by rHuIFN-beta 1a alone was reflected by significant and dose-related increases in 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin. Radiation therapy alone had no effect on these immune response parameters and did not diminish their augmentation by rHuIFN-beta 1a. There was no association of biologic modulation with clinical response or survival.

Purpose: Patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor clinical outcome. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the merit of chemotherapy administered concurrently with hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy., Patients and Methods: Seventy-nine patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Treatment consisted of two cycles of oral etoposide 100 mg/d (50 mg/d if body-surface area [BSA] < 1.70 m2), intravenous cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy 5 days per week (1.2 Gy twice daily > 6 hours apart; total 69.6 Gy)., Results: Seventy-six assessable patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 60 and adequate organ function who had received no prior therapy were evaluated for clinical outcome and toxic effects. After a minimum follow-up duration of 21 months, the 1- and 2-year survival rates and the median survival duration were 67%, 35%, and 18.9 months overall; they were 70%, 42%, and 21.1 months for patients with weight loss of < or = 5%. Toxicity was significant; 57% developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity, 53% grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, and 25% grade 3 or 4 lung toxicity. However, only 6.6% of patients had grade 4 or lethal nonhematologic toxicity, which included three treatment-related deaths (two of pneumonitis and one of renal failure)., Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin plus hyperfractionated radiation therapy is feasible. The survival outcome from this regimen compares favorably with that of other chemoradiation trials and even of multimodality trials that have included surgery.

Over the past 2 decades, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a significant role in clarifying the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RTOG lung cancer research has evolved over this time period through a systematic succession of investigations. For unresectable NSCLC, the dependence of local tumor control and survival on total dose of standard fractionation RT, as well as pretreatment performance characteristics, was demonstrated in initial RTOG trials. Subsequently, further radiation dose intensification was tested using altered fractionation RT to total doses up to 32% higher than standard RT to 60 Gy, given as either hyperfractionation or accelerated fractionation, while attempting to retain acceptable normal tissue toxicity. These higher doses required rethinking of established RT techniques and limitations, as well as careful surveillance of acute and late toxicity. A survival advantage was shown for hyperfractionation to 69.6 Gy, in favorable performance patients, compared to 60 Gy. Further testing of high dose standard RT will use three-dimensional, conformal techniques to minimize toxicity. RTOG further extended the theme of treatment intensification for unresectable NSCLC by evaluating combined chemotherapy (CT) and RT. Improved local control and survival was shown for induction CT followed by standard RT to 60 Gy, compared to standard RT (60 Gy) and altered fractionation RT (69.6 Gy). The intent of current studies is to optimize dose and scheduling of combined CT and standard RT, as well as combined CT and altered fractionation RT. Noncytotoxic RT adjuvants, such as hypoxic cell sensitizers, nonspecific immune stimulants, and biologic response modifiers have also been studied. Resectable NSCLC has also been an RTOG focus, with studies of preoperative and postoperative RT, CT, and CT/RT, including the prognostic value of serum and tissue factors. RTOG studies have yielded incremental improvements in treatment outcome for NSCLC, better understanding of the disease dynamics, and a strong foundation for future investigations.

Purpose: To establish the feasibility of performing split-course accelerated hyperfractionation (AHFX-S) and concomitant boost accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFX-C) for advanced head and neck cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative trial setting and to evaluate the tumor clearance rate and acute and late toxicity of these fractionation schedules., Methods and Materials: Between February 1989 and January 1990, 75 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive: (a) AHFX-S: 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily (6-h interval), 5 days/week, to a total dose of 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks, with a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or (b) AFX-C: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 daily fractions/week to 54 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks to a large field and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field, 6 h after large field treatment during the last 11 treatment days, to a total dose of 70.5 Gy/41 fractions/6 weeks. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the RTOG normal tissue reaction scales and tumor clearance was evaluated at completion of therapy and at regular intervals thereafter., Results: Of the 70 analyzable patients, 38 received AHFX-S and 32 received AFX-C. The two arms were balanced with respect to sex, age, T-stage, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). However, the AHFX-S arm had a higher proportion of oropharyngeal primaries (63% vs. 44%), and Stage IV disease (82% vs. 50%) and lower proportion of oral cavity lesions (3% vs. 22%) and N0 disease (16% vs. 31%) than the AFX-C arm. The median follow-up was 2 years (range: 0.03-4.87 years). Tolerance of both variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy was satisfactory. There was no significant difference in local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival between the two arms. The 2-year local-regional failure rate, survival, and disease-free survival was 50, 50, and 40%, respectively, for the entire group of patients. Acute radiation mucositis was increased in both arms. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 acute toxicities (63% vs. 56%) and grade 3 (14% vs. 14%) or grade 4 (6% vs. 17%) late toxicities. Permanent grade 4 late toxicity was observed in 6 and 7% of the patients, respectively., Conclusion: Results of this randomized Phase I/II trial showed that the two accelerated fractionated schedules studied can be successfully given in a multi-institutional cooperative trial. There was no significant difference in acute or late toxicities, local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival in this small scale study. Therefore, a Phase III trial comparing the relative efficacy of these two accelerated fractionation schedules against standard fractionation and hyperfractionation has been activated.

Background: Clinical trials of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy have shown improved survival in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiosensitization may improve local tumor control when chemotherapy is given concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy, but also may increase toxicity. A Phase I/II trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15, was designed to evaluate whether this strategy could improve survival with acceptable toxicity and be part of a Phase III trial of chemoradiation sequencing., Methods: Vinblastine (5 mg/M2 weekly x 5 weeks) and cisplatin (75 mg/M2 days 1, 29, and 50) were given during twice-daily irradiation (1.2 Gy, 6 hours apart) to 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions in 6 weeks. Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II (unresected) or IIIA-B NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status 70 or greater; there were no weight loss restrictions., Results: Of 42 eligible patients, 76% had greater than 5% weight loss, 45% had T4 primary tumors, and 62% were Stage IIIB. All protocol treatment was completed in 53%. Acute toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 19 of 42 (45%) having Grade 4 toxicity or higher, three (7%) with septic death. Ten of 42 (24%) had Grade 3 or higher esophagitis. There were two (4.7%) patients with Grade 3 or higher (1 lung and 1 esophagus) and two (4.7%) with Grade 4 or higher (1 lung and 1 hematologic) late toxicities. Median survival time was 12.2 months, with an overall 1-year survival of 54%, an estimated 2 year survival of 28% and a 1-year progression free survival of 38%., Conclusions: For patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer, who were not selected on the basis of weight loss, concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy had more intense acute toxicity than hyperfractionation alone, but late toxicity was acceptable. One and 2-year survival rates were 54 and 28%, respectively.

Background: Regionally advanced, surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer represents a disease with an extremely poor prognosis. External-beam irradiation to the primary tumor and regional lymphatics is generally accepted as standard therapy. The use of more aggressive radiation regimens and the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to radiotherapy have yielded conflicting results. Recently, however, results from clinical trials using innovative irradiation delivery techniques or chemotherapy before irradiation have indicated that patients treated with protocols that incorporate these modifications may have higher survival rates than patients receiving standard radiation therapy., Purpose: On the basis of these results, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) elected to conduct a phase III trial comparing the following regimens: 1) standard radiation therapy, 2) induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy, and 3) twice-daily radiation therapy., Methods: Patients with surgically unresectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were potential candidates. Staging was nonsurgical. Patients were required to have a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or more and weight loss less than 5% for 3 months prior to entry into the trial, to be older than 18 years of age, and to have no metastatic disease. Of the 490 patients registered in the trial, 452 were eligible. The disease in 95% of the patients was stage IIIA or IIIB. More than two thirds of the patients had a Karnofsky performance status of more than 80. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 60 Gy of radiation therapy delivered at 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week, over a 6-week period (standard radiation therapy); induction chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 29 and 5 mg/m2 vinblastine per week for 5 consecutive weeks beginning on day 1 with cisplatin, followed by standard radiation therapy starting on day 50; or 69.6 Gy delivered at 1.2 Gy per fraction twice daily (hyperfractionated radiation therapy)., Results: Toxicity was acceptable, with four treatment-related deaths. Three patients subsequently died of chronic pulmonary complications. Compliance with protocol treatment was acceptable. One-year survival (%) and median survival (months) were as follows: standard radiation therapy--46%, 11.4 months; chemotherapy plus radiotherapy--60%, 13.8 months; and hyperfractionated radiation therapy--51%, 12.3 months. The chemotherapy plus radiotherapy arm was statistically superior to the other two treatment arms (logrank P = .03)., Conclusions: In "good-risk" patients with surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, induction chemotherapy followed by irradiation was superior to hyperfractionated radiation therapy or standard radiation therapy alone, yielding a statistically significant short-term survival advantage.

Purpose: p105 is a proliferation-associated nuclear antigen which identifies proliferating but not resting cells. The objectives of this Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol (91-08) were: (1) to correlate tumor proliferative potential estimated using the p105 assay and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis with treatment outcome in patients irradiated for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; and (2) to evaluate the potential of p105 labeling indices as a predictive assay., Methods and Materials: Paraffin blocks of pretreatment biopsies of the primary tumor or metastatic neck nodes of patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone in three previous RTOG protocols (79-13, 79-15, and 83-13) were retrospectively obtained. From these paraffin blocks, areas of tumor were selected based on histological examinations and sectioned. Nuclei suspensions were then prepared and processed for p105 antibody and DNA staining and subsequent flow cytometric quantification of p105 labeling indices and DNA content and correlation with local-regional control and survival., Results: Paraffin blocks of tumor biopsies from 148 out of a total of 598 eligible patients were available. Of these, 143 were analyzable. The median and (range) of p105 labeling index (LI-C), p105 labeling index of cells in S phase (LI-S), and p105 antigen density (AD) were: 66.6 (3.85-99.5), 9 (1.55-36), and 93.2 (7.4-628.5), respectively. Deoxyribonucleic acid was diploid in 67 (47%), aneuploid in 22 (15%) and mixed aneuploid/diploid in 54 (38%) patients. There was a strong correlation between AD and DNA ploidy. Antigen density was above median in 91.5% of the aneuploid or mixed aneuploid/diploid tumors, but only in 8.5% of the diploid tumors. Patients with aneuploid or mixed aneuploid/diploid tumors had significantly greater local-regional failures than patients with diploid tumors (p = .0180). Those with p105 LI-C below the median or p105 AD above the median also had significantly greater local-regional failures (p = .0500 and p = .0167, respectively). Patients with p105 AD below the median had significantly better survival than those above the median (p = .0444), although there was no significant difference in survival with respect to DNA ploidy or p105 LI-C. Multivariate analyses showed that T-stage (p = .0001) and p105 AD (p = .0044) were significant prognostic factors for local-regional control, and T-stage (p = .0080), N-stage (p = .0021), primary site (p = .0110), and p105 AD (p = .0326) were significant prognostic factors for survival., Conclusion: These results suggest that flow cytometric quantitation of the proliferation-associated nuclear antigen p105 and DNA content of pretreatment tumor biopsies may be a potentially useful predictive assay in patients irradiated for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Purpose: To better understand racial differences in data for patients referred for definitive treatment of biopsy-proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland., Materials and Methods: Two groups of patients were defined for further analysis. Group 1 comprised all patients who received definitive external beam irradiation of prostatic carcinoma; group 2 comprised all patients with prostatic carcinoma referred between January 1988 and December 1992 for examination at the first clinical indication of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. All patients were evaluated for age, race (black vs white), differentiation of tumor, date of diagnosis, and clinical stage., Results: In group 1, black patients were significantly younger and presented with disease at higher clinical stage but equivalent grade and survival compared with white patients. In group 2, black patients were significantly younger and had similar differentiation of tumor but with significantly higher clinical stage compared with white patients and more often had obstructive symptoms and less often had been screened for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels., Conclusion: Black patients should undergo earlier screening for prostate cancer.

Prospective trials exploring questions of dose intensity for control of the local-regional tumor have been conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group for 20 years. Early studies established radiation therapy with a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions as standard (STD) for unresectable non-small cell carcinomas of the lung (NSCCL). Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) with 1.2 Gy twice daily permitted higher total doses without increased normal tissue effects and led to comparison of STD vs. HFX (total dose 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions). Induction chemotherapy followed by STD, induction followed by concurrent chemotherapy and STD, and concurrent chemotherapy and HFX, have been explored in successive trials. Preliminary results of STD combined with chemotherapy suggest that increases in dose intensity increase local-regional control and survival. Confirmatory trials of increased dose intensity by combining chemotherapy with STD and HFX have been completed or are progressing.

Unlabelled: In a major study that showed a treatment advantage for induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (CALGB 8433), there was a significantly (P = 0.02) lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days of registration in the chemotherapy/radiation arm than the radiation therapy arm; without this difference, the overall survival was marginally better (P = 0.059) for the chemotherapy/radiation group. A retrospective analysis of RTOG trials sought explanations for the phenomenon., Materials and Methods: Patients who fit the CALGB eligibility criteria and received radiation therapy alone in four prospective trials of the RTOG conducted between 1983 and 1989 were analyzed to determine factors that distinguished patients dying within 105 days from longer survivors. Two were trials of altered fractionation and two used standard fractionation. Of 683 patients identified, 107 (15.7%) died within 105 days after registration. The log linear model was used to evaluate relationships between death within 105 days and known prognostic factors. Karnofsky performance status (KPS), < 90 vs. > or = 90, was the only factor significantly related to death within 105 days (P = 0.0052). A Cox model with the same factors plus fractionation and total dose found KPS and T-stage associated with overall survival (P = 0.0005 and 0.025, respectively). The choice of the hyperfractionation arm (HFX) for Phase III study (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d.) was based in part on comparison with standard fractionation (STD) from a concurrent RTOG protocol, 8321. Review of early deaths showed that this HFX arm had a lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days (7.9%) than STD in 8321 (21.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Purpose: To determine if prolonged treatment time adversely affects survival for patients with inoperable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung., Methods and Materials: Patients enrolled on three randomized studies (RTOG 8311, 8321, 8403) between 1983-1989 formed the database. Previous analyses found that the addition of thymosin (8321) or prophylactic cranial irradiation (8403) failed to prolong survival: both studies used thoracic irradiation with standard fractionation to 55-60 Gy in 30 fractions. In 8311, patients were treated by hyperfractionated radiation therapy to randomly assigned total doses of 60.0 Gy, 64.8 Gy, 69.6 Gy, 74.4 Gy or 79.2 Gy, 1.2 Gy twice daily, 5 days per week. Patients analyzed received +/- 4% of the assigned total dose and lived > 90 days (to ensure that all patients would have completed treatment). Completion < 5 days beyond protocol specifications was classified as "per protocol." Elapsed treatment time exceeding specifications by 5-9 days was a minor deviation, 10-13 days was a major deviation-acceptable, and > or = 14 days was a major deviation-unacceptable. Absolute survival was the endpoint to evaluate the effect of delays. The log rank statistic was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting, the Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting., Results: Of 293 patients treated with standard fractionation, eight (2.7%) had deviations from the specified treatment time (six minor, two major-acceptable). With hyperfractionation, 90 (15%) patients had deviations (40 minor, 21 major-acceptable, 29 major-unacceptable). As the assigned dose increased, the deviation rate increased (9.7% for 60.0 Gy vs. 20.8% for 79.2 Gy). Survivals for hyperfractionation patients with any deviations in treatment time were significantly shorter than those treated "per protocol" (p = 0.16): estimated 2- and 5-years rates were 24% and 10% versus 13% and 3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed the delay effect to be entirely in patients treated with 69.6 Gy or higher; there was also dependence upon the patients' prognosis. In patients with favorable prognosis (KPS 90-100, weight loss < or = 5%, no N3), the difference in survival was pronounced (33% and 15% vs. 14% and 0% at 2- and 5-years, respectively). Such differences were not found in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors., Conclusions: Interruptions delaying completion of planned radiation therapy were more frequent with higher total doses (> or = 69.6 Gy). Favorable patients (high KPS, little weight loss, < N3 nodal metastasis) had markedly adverse effects on long-term survival associated with delays to completion of the planned total dose.

Purpose: The risk of pulmonary toxicity, observed in an Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase I/II randomized dose escalation trial of hyperfractionated irradiation for nonsmall cell lung cancer, was analyzed with regard to custom vs. hand blocking and compliance to protocol specified treatment field parameters., Materials and Methods: There were 832 evaluable cases analyzed. The protocol required field margins 2 cm beyond primary tumor and involved nodes. In 674, the field margins were considered "per protocol" or as having minor protocol variations. In 94, margins exceeded protocol specification ("excessive margin" group). In this group, the area (cm2) of the effective (blocked) field and the portion including lung was measured from simulator films with a computer scanning device. Based on size and location of the primary and nodal disease, "per protocol" fields were constructed and the area (cm2) of lung included beyond these margins was estimated. Patients from both groups who received less than 30 Gy to normal lung were excluded from analysis of pulmonary toxicity., Results: Grade 1 acute lung toxicity was higher (p = .009) in the "excessive margin" group compared to the "per protocol" group, whereas late lung toxicity was not significantly different (p = .94). The risk of Grade 2 or greater acute toxicity increased as area of excess irradiated lung increased. Overall lung toxicity, defined as the greater of either acute or late toxicity, was evaluated by multivariate analysis, in relation to assigned dose, effective treated field area, and type of shielding. Overall maximum lung toxicity (> or = Grade 2) was significantly greater in the "excessive margin" group, when lung treated beyond protocol margins exceeded an area of 35 cm2, than in the "per protocol" group, but only when the effective treated field size was > or = 180 cm2 (68% vs. 37%; p = .02). This effect was independent of assigned total dose or type of shielding., Conclusion: For nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated irradiation, the risk of overall pulmonary toxicity was increased for patients treated with field sizes in excess of protocol specified margins of tumor coverage in comparison to patients treated with protocol specified margins. This effect was seen only when the area of lung treated beyond protocol margins exceeded 35 cm2 and when the overall field size was below 180 cm2.

Purpose: A Phase I/II trial was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group from 1984 to 1989 for 355 evaluable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer to assess tolerance to and efficacy of accelerated fractionation irradiation via concomitant boost., Methods and Materials: "Large" fields (primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes) received 1.8 Gy followed after 4 to 6 hr by 1.8 Gy two to three times weekly to reduced "boost" fields (primary and involved nodes only). The total doses escalated during the study and started with 63 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 18 Gy "boost") for 61 patients. After follow-up for ongoing toxicity assessment, the total dose was increased to 70.2 Gy in 5.5 weeks (50.4 Gy "large" field and 19.8 Gy "boost") for the next 180 patients. The last 114 patients received 70.2 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 25.2 Gy "boost")., Results: Pretreatment patient characteristics were well balanced between the three treatment arms. Grade 3 acute toxicity was 7% for the 63 Gy arm; it was 14% and 17% for the two 70 Gy arms. Grade 4 or greater acute toxicities (esophagitis and pneumonitis) were 2 to 3% for all three arms. Late toxicities ranged between 5 and 9% (> or = Grade 3) and 0 to 2% (> or = Grade 4), not statistically different among the three arms. There was no difference between the three regimens in median survival (9 months) or 1-year survival (39 to 44%). However, the 2-year survivals ranged from 16% (63 Gy) to 21% ("shortened" 70.2 Gy). Among 176 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, 1984, Stage III; Karnofsky performance status 70 to 100; < 6% weight loss), the 2-year survival rates ranged from 18 to 22%., Conclusion: Concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation regimens for non-small cell lung cancer may offer improved long-term survival without enhanced late toxicity. While acute toxicity is somewhat increased, further refinement of the relationship of "large" to "boost" field doses may improve the therapeutic ratio. Further Phase I/II testing seems justified and necessary, before concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation is tested in Phase III trials for NSCLC.