1. Transformation of a non-enzymatic toxin into a toxoid by genetic engineering
- Author
-
Pascal Drevet, Bernard Maillere, André Ménez, Frédéric Ducancel, C Fromen-Romano, E. Lajeunesse, and Jean-Claude Boulain
- Subjects
Male ,Antigenicity ,Immunogen ,Antibody Affinity ,Bioengineering ,Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ,Biology ,Receptors, Nicotinic ,medicine.disease_cause ,Biochemistry ,Microbiology ,law.invention ,Mice ,law ,medicine ,Animals ,Elapidae ,Site-directed mutagenesis ,Molecular Biology ,DNA Primers ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Erabutoxins ,Mice, Inbred BALB C ,Base Sequence ,Toxin ,Circular Dichroism ,Immune Sera ,Cholera toxin ,Osmolar Concentration ,Toxoid ,Toxoids ,Recombinant Proteins ,Enzyme ,chemistry ,Recombinant DNA ,Mutagenesis, Site-Directed ,Rabbits ,Biotechnology ,Protein Binding - Abstract
Curaremimetic toxins are typical non-enzymatic toxins thatbind to their target [the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor(AChR)] through multiple residues. Nevertheless, we showthat the concomitant substitutions of only three of the tenfunctionally important residues of such a toxin sufficed tocause an affinity decrease of the toxin for AChR that ishigher than four orders of magnitude. Despite these triplemutations, the overall conformation of the mutated proteinremains similar to that of a related recombinant toxin, asjudged from both circular dichroism analysis and investi-gation of antigenicity, using monoclonal and polyclonalantibodies. Furthermore, we show that the detoxified toxinis capable of eliciting antibodies that neutralize the bindingof a wild-type toxin to AChR. Therefore, transformationof a non-enzymatic toxin into a toxoid can be achieved,like in the case of enzymatic toxins, by introducing a smallnumber of mutations at positions identified to be criticalfor expression of toxicity.Keywords: snake toxin/site directed mutagenesis/toxoidIntroductionThe use of living vectors expressing selected recombinantantigens appears to be a promising approach for immunizinghumans or animals against various pathogens, including toxicproteins (Pozzi et al., 1992; Walker et al., 1992; N’Guyenet al., 1993; Stover et al., 1993; Gomez-Duarteet al., 1995).For evident safety reasons, it is of primary importance thatthe immunogen produced by a living organism is devoid oftoxic activity. In the case of toxic proteins, two situations canbe encountered. First, the toxin possesses enzymatic activityand its pathogenicity is directly associated with expression ofthis activity. In principle, therefore, abolition of the later shouldsuffice for detoxification and indeed, this strategy has beensuccessfully applied to bacterial enzymes such as pertussistoxin (Pizza et al., 1989; Loosmore et al., 1990; Rappuoliet al., 1992), cholera toxin (Hase et al., 1994; Fontana et al.,1995) or Shiga-like toxin (Gordon et al., 1992), in whichmutations of a few (one or two) crucial catalytic positionswere sufficient to fully inactivate the toxins. Second, the toxinsexert their function without expression of any enzymaticactivity but simply by binding to a biological target. This isthe case, for example, for some bacterial toxins, such asStaphylococcal toxins (Bonventre et al., 1995; Ulrich et al.,1995), cytolysins (Bhakdi et al., 1996) and of a large proportionof animal toxins, including most snake and scorpion toxins(Me´nez et al., 1991). Then, a related question is to what extent
- Published
- 1998